Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Ms Kat
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
28
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 11:01:00 -
[31] - Quote
]Karkaroph wrote:Ms Kat wrote:This game being marketed as a PvP game is just a joke!
In my mind PvP is where both sides have a equal chance of winning a fight. There is actualy skill involved etc.
Now eve pvp consists of spying, lieing and exploiting game mechaics to tip the balance in your direction. Then Hiding when the advantage isnt yours.
The game has no skill - other than who has jumped through ccp's hoops the longest and trained more sp's. Or maybe the guy who has EFT'd the longest and figured out a good ship fit You're essentially describing every major battle and conflict that mankind has engaged in since we were upright monkeys throwing f+ªces at each other. PvP is a continuation of the best offensive strategy ever devised: "The Gank". Is it therefore surprising that people such as yourself find it offensive? Karkaroph thinks not.
I feel I should warn you, I am lactoseintollerant and have rather large hands  |

Implying Implications
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
168
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 11:02:00 -
[32] - Quote
e1ite pvp püåpüÉpüàn+P |

Teinyhr
A Club for Reputable Gentlemen
78
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 11:05:00 -
[33] - Quote
Arkon Olacar wrote: So by your (faulty carebear) logic, gate camps, small gangs attacking single targets, and solo PvPers picking on an outclassed ship are all fairly low forms of PvP, with 'zilch' glory to be won? Maybe you should tell these space-hipsters, who are currently furiously stoking their e-peens, while shouting out "Large fleet warfare is so mainstream" in the vain hope someone will notice them.
No (and yes), no aaand - no. There's a difference fighting something that can bite you back and something that is only dangerous to space rocks. I'm just tired of seeing people thumping their chests on destroying a mining ship, fitted like a mining ship, like they were the gods of PvP. |

Maddy Joringer
United Society of Xziles
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 11:07:00 -
[34] - Quote
what really gets me is not folks attacking miners, but attacking them by exploiting game mechanics, miners have a very narrow choices of trying to defend himself ... not only that ... but CCP just accepts the fact that exploiting game mechanics should be allowed is rather sad and pathetic :s
IF you wanna gank something , gank something which can actually defend themselves not new players who are just weeks and months old :s |

Karkaroph
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
49
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 11:13:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ms Kat wrote:I feel I should warn you, I am lactoseintollerant and have rather large hands 
And Karkaroph is a very old man on a strictly fiber diet that is yet harshly inadequate.
When the time comes, as it does with alarmingly massive inconsistency, Karkaroph promises you turpitudal missiles of such a weight and density that the moon itself will shift from orbit, such is their field of gravity.
I have seen so much of it, that truly I know nothing of it, except that it embaces me.
I, Karkaroph. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
950
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 11:15:00 -
[36] - Quote
It's the same as ratting. The AI is just dumber. Here's your sign... |

Sabrina Solette
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
23
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 11:20:00 -
[37] - Quote
Not really, it's just a one way exchange. Followed by intervention by a PvE police force. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1364
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 12:22:00 -
[38] - Quote
Possum's Awesome wrote:Is ganking PvP?
Is the ganker a Player?
Is the miner a Player?
Question answered.
The ganker is always a player. The miner, on the other hand... a rogue goon |

Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians Tribal Band
95
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 14:14:00 -
[39] - Quote
Teinyhr wrote:Arkon Olacar wrote: So by your (faulty carebear) logic, gate camps, small gangs attacking single targets, and solo PvPers picking on an outclassed ship are all fairly low forms of PvP, with 'zilch' glory to be won? Maybe you should tell these space-hipsters, who are currently furiously stoking their e-peens, while shouting out "Large fleet warfare is so mainstream" in the vain hope someone will notice them.
No (and yes), no aaand - no. There's a difference fighting something that can bite you back and something that is only dangerous to space rocks. I'm just tired of seeing people thumping their chests on destroying a mining ship, fitted like a mining ship, like they were the gods of PvP. Except this is actually fairly challenging, compared to 'leet pvp'. When ganking, it is a race against the clock - you have to destroy the mining ship before concord shows up and kicks you in the nuts. There are so many variables - what if the miner fitted an actual tank? This could leave your victim alive when you get killed.
With stuff like gate camps, there is nothing left to chance. Your victim gets caught in a bubble, scramed and webbed, and usually ECM'd by a falcon alt also (all hail elite pvp). Your victim can do nothing but die, his attempts at fitting a tank matter not as you have plenty of time to grind him down.
In other words, ganking a miner is like clubbing a panda to death before the zookeepers catch you, while 'leet pvp' is like hunting foxes with packs of rabid dogs. "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |

Russell Casey
Did I Gank You
172
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 14:18:00 -
[40] - Quote
Maddy Joringer wrote:what really gets me is not folks attacking miners, but attacking them by exploiting game mechanics, miners have a very narrow choices of trying to defend himself ... not only that ... but CCP just accepts the fact that exploiting game mechanics should be allowed is rather sad and pathetic :s
IF you wanna gank something , gank something which can actually defend themselves not new players who are just weeks and months old :s
What exploit? If CCP REALLY thought killing a target before CONCORD killed you was an exploit they'd simply make all non-flagged targets immune to each other in highsec. As it stands, every year or so they make suicide ganking/highsec piracy even more difficult to protect their carebear subs (only a matter of time before AWOXING goes or worse, becomes the only viable option left) despite all the bawling that goons run the game and are conspiring to force everyone into null by killing highsec. |
|

Abel Merkabah
TIMELINE Industries
70
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 14:20:00 -
[41] - Quote
Ms Kat wrote:This game being marketed as a PvP game is just a joke!
In my mind PvP is where both sides have a equal chance of winning a fight. There is actualy skill involved etc.
Now eve pvp consists of spying, lieing and exploiting game mechaics to tip the balance in your direction. Then Hiding when the advantage isnt yours.
The game has no skill - other than who has jumped through ccp's hoops the longest and trained more sp's. Or maybe the guy who has EFT'd the longest and figured out a good ship fit
You are not seeing the big picture. Each player is given the same tools; so the game is on even ground; it's each individual's right to chose the tools they want to use in game. So perfectly fair for all sides in an engagement.
You are focusing on individual tactics instead of larger picture, if you chose to fight when the advantage isn't yours, out of some sense of e-honor (excluding for fun gudfights), then you are the problem, in the big picture, knowing when to fight and when not to fight is probably one of the best skills to have. And I'm not pretending to have this skill, if you look at my KB, I pick fights with stuff I shouldn't on a regular basis, and lose ships for it. But I'm not interested in the larger picture "win" of eve, I just want to see things burn. "The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds, given adequate vacuuming systems." |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8667
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 14:25:00 -
[42] - Quote
Since both parties were players and since no exploits are involved, yes. Of course it is. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope Gallente Federation
372
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 14:25:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ganking miners is to pvp as street mugging old ladies is to street gang violence. You want fries with that? |

Benny Ohu
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
221
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 14:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Ganking miners is to pvp as street mugging old ladies is to street gang violence. Pushover Versus Playa |

Jimmy Gunsmythe
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
72
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 14:50:00 -
[45] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote: let me sort it by relevance:
highly relevant:
suicide ganking blob warfare
absolutely irrelevant:
wulfpax/small gangs/whatever
Well-spoken. Of course, not a surprising sentiment.
Richard Desturned wrote:The ganker is always a player. The miner, on the other hand...
Tippia wrote:Since both parties were players and since no exploits are involved, yes. Of course it is.
Um, so are they both players or aren't they?
In the strictest definition, ganking would fit because it is one player pitting himself against another player, thus Player versus Player. However, the glory and respect gained is usually minimal because there is no challenge or real risk involved. Yes, one will lose the ship and modules, of course, but the risk I speak of is that of failure. That risk should always be assumed by the attacker, not the defender (the defender has his own risk quotient dependent upon his own activity), and because that risk is minimal in that regard, it is unbalanced PvP to say the least.
That said, it is a tricky balancing act. I support the right to gank, and I support the right to mine. Actually, I support most every activity within the game, so I can see the viewpoint of most everyone involved. A good predator knows how to live in balance with his prey, lest he follow them into oblivion. |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 15:42:00 -
[46] - Quote
Responding to the OP:
Yes, it is player vs player, unless there is a bot involved. Then it is a public service.
Also, if you fit for tank in anything higher than a .6 (maybe a .7), there is no way without the "bounties" to gank profitably (not including fun to be had as revenue).
Also, ganks can be avoided. Mining aligned (which works unless you jet can mine, then your SOL) will make you nearly unkillable. You can warp off before the ganker would drop out of warp (with enough time to check ship type for common gank ships, no reason to warp off because of another miner... usually). |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1366
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 15:53:00 -
[47] - Quote
Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:Um, so are they both players or aren't they?
did it go right over your head? a rogue goon |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 16:03:00 -
[48] - Quote
Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:... Richard Desturned wrote:The ganker is always a player. The miner, on the other hand... Tippia wrote:Since both parties were players and since no exploits are involved, yes. Of course it is. Um, so are they both players or aren't they? ... The implication being that there are bot miners, so there is a chance when ganking that you are not shooting a player, but a bot. in which case it is not PvP.
A public service, but not PvP. |

MinefieldS
1 Sick Duck Standss on something
69
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 18:19:00 -
[49] - Quote
Krysta Bourne wrote:Ganking is to PvP as Mike Tyson beating up the 3rd grade cripple is to boxing.
Ganking miners is like poaching deer Wardeccing miners is like hunting deer with a permit PvP is like going on a safari in Africa armed only with a knife
Mike Tyson beating up the 3rd grade cripple is what CONCORD does. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
4350
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 18:23:00 -
[50] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Tiers of PVP Elite tier: Solo PVP Small gang PVP
Medium tier: Gate camping
Low tier: "Solo" PVP with Falcon alt Blob warfare
Coward tier: "It's hot drop o'clock!"
**** tier: Suicide ganking let me sort it by relevance: highly relevant: suicide ganking blob warfare absolutely irrelevant: wulfpax/small gangs/whatever
I guess your parents are pretty proud that you're "relevant" in a video game. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
|

Commit Sudoku
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 19:46:00 -
[51] - Quote
my father disowned me after he found out i play eve guy on foreground: me posting guy in background: you |

Katalci
Creative Cookie Procuring Veto Corp
103
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 19:53:00 -
[52] - Quote
PvP -- Player versus Player
Since miners/mission runners are not real players, no. |

Ginseng Jita
PAN-EVE TRADING COMPANY
1593
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 19:54:00 -
[53] - Quote
Yes, absolutely. |

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
130
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 19:57:00 -
[54] - Quote
resource denial ftw! |

baltec1
Bat Country
1665
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 19:59:00 -
[55] - Quote
Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:
In the strictest definition, ganking would fit because it is one player pitting himself against another player, thus Player versus Player. However, the glory and respect gained is usually minimal because there is no challenge or real risk involved. Yes, one will lose the ship and modules, of course, but the risk I speak of is that of failure. That risk should always be assumed by the attacker, not the defender (the defender has his own risk quotient dependent upon his own activity), and because that risk is minimal in that regard, it is unbalanced PvP to say the least.
That said, it is a tricky balancing act. I support the right to gank, and I support the right to mine. Actually, I support most every activity within the game, so I can see the viewpoint of most everyone involved.
There is this trick miners can pull but its not all that well known. Its called fitting a tank. |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 20:08:00 -
[56] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:
In the strictest definition, ganking would fit because it is one player pitting himself against another player, thus Player versus Player. However, the glory and respect gained is usually minimal because there is no challenge or real risk involved. Yes, one will lose the ship and modules, of course, but the risk I speak of is that of failure. That risk should always be assumed by the attacker, not the defender (the defender has his own risk quotient dependent upon his own activity), and because that risk is minimal in that regard, it is unbalanced PvP to say the least.
That said, it is a tricky balancing act. I support the right to gank, and I support the right to mine. Actually, I support most every activity within the game, so I can see the viewpoint of most everyone involved.
There is this trick miners can pull but its not all that well known. Its called fitting a tank.
Or Flying aligned (webbed or otherwise). Or watching D-Scan. Or having a friend in a Nado sitting there (though this requires you to fit some tank as well). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Jax Bederen
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
112
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 20:46:00 -
[57] - Quote
Let just say it's Eve pvp, similar to jokers in pvp fits going into a mission and trying to bait a pve fit to fight or the small army vs 1 gate camps. I don't see any sense of triumph from this unless you really have little else in your life. As far as hulks, they did deserve it when not even trying to have some defense, but meh, it's still just shooting ducks in a barrel. |

EvEa Deva
State War Academy Caldari State
52
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 21:11:00 -
[58] - Quote
Miner ganking is PvP as much as Mike Tyson vs Betty White is a Boxing match |

Mallak Azaria
370
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 21:38:00 -
[59] - Quote
Teinyhr wrote:Arkon Olacar wrote: So by your (faulty carebear) logic, gate camps, small gangs attacking single targets, and solo PvPers picking on an outclassed ship are all fairly low forms of PvP, with 'zilch' glory to be won? Maybe you should tell these space-hipsters, who are currently furiously stoking their e-peens, while shouting out "Large fleet warfare is so mainstream" in the vain hope someone will notice them.
No (and yes), no aaand - no. There's a difference fighting something that can bite you back and something that is only dangerous to space rocks. I'm just tired of seeing people thumping their chests on destroying a mining ship, fitted like a mining ship, like they were the gods of PvP.
Then stop destroying those poor, innocent asteroids. They can't fit a tank or warp away from a mining ships. You can say we're picking on the weak all you like, but we're acually protecting the weakest species in all of EVE. |

Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope Gallente Federation
375
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 22:08:00 -
[60] - Quote
Commit Sudoku wrote:my father disowned me after he found out i play eve
Mine just laughs at me , and tells me to act my age and stop playing kids games. You want fries with that? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |