EVE Search - Question for Distant Thunder Corparation..

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Question for Distant Thunder Corparation..

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:40:00 - [61] Its called recreating the exploit so we could let the Gms know what youve been upto and yes we recreated it several times so we know how you got these ships.
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:40:00 - [62] Its called recreating the exploit so we could let the Gms know what youve been upto and yes we recreated it several times so we know how you got these ships.
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:42:00 - [63] "If its not covered by CCP it aint an exploit. Its a ****up." Sorry explain? dont speak 5yr old.
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:42:00 - [64] "If its not covered by CCP it aint an exploit. Its a ****up." Sorry explain? dont speak 5yr old.
V2GBR	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:45:00 - [65] I just dont understand how you think its an exploit ! How about you ****in explain to me and make sense. ---------- http://guc.webinventions.co.uk <-- GUC Site. www.webinventions.co.uk <-- My eve history.
V2GBR	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:45:00 - [66] I just dont understand how you think its an exploit ! How about you ****in explain to me and make sense. ---------- http://guc.webinventions.co.uk <-- GUC Site. www.webinventions.co.uk <-- My eve history.
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:47:00 - [67] ok huffer, would u agree that objects on the inside of a POS forcefield should not be allowed to be accessed outside of it by people who dont have access and in fact are war nme's? I mean its a frikken forcefield right?
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:47:00 - [68] ok huffer, would u agree that objects on the inside of a POS forcefield should not be allowed to be accessed outside of it by people who dont have access and in fact are war nme's? I mean its a frikken forcefield right?
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:48:00 - [69] but u can fly a pod to the shield and the guns wont hurt u yes?
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:48:00 - [70] but u can fly a pod to the shield and the guns wont hurt u yes?
V2GBR	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:50:00 - [71] 1. Did you set there standings on the POS ? 2. If so but when in a pod this allows you to by pass the forcefield then its a game mechanic yet to be covered by CCp, which takes me back to the point of it being a CCP mistake. ---------- http://guc.webinventions.co.uk <-- GUC Site. www.webinventions.co.uk <-- My eve history.
V2GBR	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:50:00 - [72] 1. Did you set there standings on the POS ? 2. If so but when in a pod this allows you to by pass the forcefield then its a game mechanic yet to be covered by CCp, which takes me back to the point of it being a CCP mistake. ---------- http://guc.webinventions.co.uk <-- GUC Site. www.webinventions.co.uk <-- My eve history.
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:52:00 - [73] Edited by: Perssephone on 23/12/2004 11:26:53 Censored :)
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:52:00 - [74] Edited by: Perssephone on 23/12/2004 11:26:53 Censored :)
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:54:00 - [75] Edited by: Perssephone on 23/12/2004 11:27:24 Censored, dammit its censorship i tell ya!!!
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:54:00 - [76] Edited by: Perssephone on 23/12/2004 11:27:24 Censored, dammit its censorship i tell ya!!!
Urfin	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:55:00 - [77] Edited by: Urfin on 23/12/2004 11:15:40 We at DT are all serious mature players, not some 1337 kiddies bent on world domination through any means, and thus consider exploit accusations very seriously. Since we are absolutely certain that none of our members would or did use an exploit, we have contacted the GMs for investigation in this matter. I would advise 7vb not to go around throwing accusations that you can not prove. By resorting to such lowly measures you're simply proving that you have no ability to fight properly, and are generally making fools of yourselves in front of the public. Not to mention that you're breaking forum rules by posting about exploits. For the interested, here's a link to a FRAPS video of the ship confiscation in question. Enjoy :)
Urfin	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:55:00 - [78] Edited by: Urfin on 23/12/2004 11:15:40 We at DT are all serious mature players, not some 1337 kiddies bent on world domination through any means, and thus consider exploit accusations very seriously. Since we are absolutely certain that none of our members would or did use an exploit, we have contacted the GMs for investigation in this matter. I would advise 7vb not to go around throwing accusations that you can not prove. By resorting to such lowly measures you're simply proving that you have no ability to fight properly, and are generally making fools of yourselves in front of the public. Not to mention that you're breaking forum rules by posting about exploits. For the interested, here's a link to a FRAPS video of the ship confiscation in question. Enjoy :)
V2GBR	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:56:00 - [79] Its not an exploit. People call stuff like this exploits, but its something that CCP has not covered. IE a ****up. Im sure CCP in time will stop this. Exploit means cheat imho and they have not done that. You lost your ships due to a hole in CCP's working live with it and stop calling me Huffer. ---------- http://guc.webinventions.co.uk <-- GUC Site. www.webinventions.co.uk <-- My eve history.
V2GBR	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:56:00 - [80] Its not an exploit. People call stuff like this exploits, but its something that CCP has not covered. IE a ****up. Im sure CCP in time will stop this. Exploit means cheat imho and they have not done that. You lost your ships due to a hole in CCP's working live with it and stop calling me Huffer. ---------- http://guc.webinventions.co.uk <-- GUC Site. www.webinventions.co.uk <-- My eve history.
Loctar	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:57:00 - [81] exploiting - using faulty game mechanics to your advantage if CCP say you souldent be able to do a that and u are. its a faulty game mechanic, if u use it by definition you are using a exploit. There is no such thing as innocence, only various degrees of guilt
Loctar	Posted - 2004.12.23 10:57:00 - [82] exploiting - using faulty game mechanics to your advantage if CCP say you souldent be able to do a that and u are. its a faulty game mechanic, if u use it by definition you are using a exploit. There is no such thing as innocence, only various degrees of guilt
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 11:05:00 - [83] that was a nice fraps, basically proving you exploited :) bit edited tho hey. make sure u send that to a gm as well
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 11:05:00 - [84] that was a nice fraps, basically proving you exploited :) bit edited tho hey. make sure u send that to a gm as well
V2GBR	Posted - 2004.12.23 11:16:00 - [85] All you want is a ban. Well i hope you dont get what you want. And if you did then CCP are in the wrong as to ban people for there bad game mechanics ---------- http://guc.webinventions.co.uk <-- GUC Site. www.webinventions.co.uk <-- My eve history.
V2GBR	Posted - 2004.12.23 11:16:00 - [86] All you want is a ban. Well i hope you dont get what you want. And if you did then CCP are in the wrong as to ban people for there bad game mechanics ---------- http://guc.webinventions.co.uk <-- GUC Site. www.webinventions.co.uk <-- My eve history.
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 11:23:00 - [87] thats an old excuse for any exploit. I dont want a ban, ive recieved my ships back thanks, what i want is A: a formal apology and B: the money deducted from theyre accounts for the ships they stole via the exploit. Not totally unreasonable.
Perssephone	Posted - 2004.12.23 11:23:00 - [88] thats an old excuse for any exploit. I dont want a ban, ive recieved my ships back thanks, what i want is A: a formal apology and B: the money deducted from theyre accounts for the ships they stole via the exploit. Not totally unreasonable.
V2GBR	Posted - 2004.12.23 11:25:00 - [89] Originally by: Perssephone thats an old excuse for any exploit. I dont want a ban, ive recieved my ships back thanks, what i want is A: a formal apology and B: the money deducted from theyre accounts for the ships they stole via the exploit. Not totally unreasonable. LMAO i dont think you will get either :) Ok u have ships! LOCK THE THREAD ! ---------- http://guc.webinventions.co.uk <-- GUC Site. www.webinventions.co.uk <-- My eve history.
V2GBR	Posted - 2004.12.23 11:25:00 - [90] Originally by: Perssephone thats an old excuse for any exploit. I dont want a ban, ive recieved my ships back thanks, what i want is A: a formal apology and B: the money deducted from theyre accounts for the ships they stole via the exploit. Not totally unreasonable. LMAO i dont think you will get either :) Ok u have ships! LOCK THE THREAD ! ---------- http://guc.webinventions.co.uk <-- GUC Site. www.webinventions.co.uk <-- My eve history.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.