There is indeed something wrong with the fitting options for mining barges and exumers.

When a 300 million ISK ship can be killed by a 1 million ISK gank ship piloted by a new character, something is indeed wrong.
When someone sneezes in the general direction of a mining barge and it explodes, something is indeed wrong.
When nobody mines in low and nullsec anymore because the ships are so fragile, something is indeed wrong.
When even the best officer fit exumer tank still falls prey to a solo T1 fitted cruiser, something is indeed wrong.
When the last update to mining barges was the Exodus expansion, the second expansion for EvE Online that introduced them back in 2004, something is indeed wrong.

They're not ungankable. Nothing is ungankable nor will anything ever be ungankable as per CCPs design. Ganking was never intended to be a profitable profession in highsec. It's a measure players can take if they're desperate for revenge.

Know that the problem of highsec ganking has more roots than a single problem to point at. It's multiple problems that exacerbate each other. Yes -10 sec players that roam freely in highsec are a problem and yes the fragility of mining barges/exumers are also a problem. Together they cause what we currently see today.

my point is that -10s can use gates while in a ship, this is bullshit, i can understand moving your pod through high sec, but you shouldnt be able to jump your -10 thrasher pilot.

nore should you be able to launch a -10 pilot from an orca

or hop into a gank ship that is empty in a safe spot and then be able to warp right away to roid belt to gank a target.

it shouldnt cost a hundreds of millions to gank a skiff if you want to use that logic. my point is that -10s can use gates while in a ship, this is bullshit, i can understand moving your pod through high sec, but you shouldnt be able to jump your -10 thrasher pilot.

nore should you be able to launch a -10 pilot from an orca

or hop into a gank ship that is empty in a safe spot and then be able to warp right away to roid belt to gank a target.

if -10 allts couldnt do the above mentioned things, then there would be a lot less griefing of miners

No it wasn't and maybe you should use a little of your "reasoning" to actually make a statement that doesn't make you look like a pants-on-head Rtard.

There is nothing wrong with the fit options mining barges allow currently.

wtf CCP, why make ships ungankable when the real issue is freedom of -10s in high sec?

Miners are being ganked indiscriminately because:

-10 can fly around high sec in destroyers with out being stopped at gates. -10s shouldnt be able to jump a ship through gates
-10 can hope into an empty gank fitted ship in a safe spot and immediately warp to a roid belt to kill a target
-10 can be launched from a positive sec status orca

this is the problem, too much freedom for -10 players in high sec and not enough consequence for killing a target in high sec

so you think it should require multiple gank fitted tornados to kill a 200million isk skiff. the ratio of isk destroyed vs isk destroyed by concord is a bit ******

i'm sure that you've operated as a -10 in hisec without any issues

-you dont think that its a bit ridiculous that you can harbor a -10 pilot in your orca with out consequence?
-pretty obvious that gates should be restricted to positive sec status pilots
-being able to hop into a ship that has been sitting in space and literally warp to your target immediately? with all the other bullshit timers in eve there might as well be a timer to prevent this

I have forgotten more about suicide ganking then you will ever know, and have been doing it since before your toon existed. im not asking for safe zones, im asking for compromise. i dont want to see a 200 million isk skiff be able to tank multiple gank fitted tornados.

There is nothing wrong with the fit options mining barges allow currently.

Ah, **** it.

I'm done playing "nice" with you lot, and I consider myself at least a little bit of a carebear at heart:

Leave our sandbox, now, and feel free to...not come back.

There are no "safe-zones" in EVE, there are no "no-touch halos" around your head,

THIS.
IS.
NOT.
WoW.
(Or any of its many even worse clones/wannabes, for that matter.)

What the f is so bloody hard about this?

If you think there is no freedom for -10 in high sec your... My iPhone is garbage post over for now

Lies. You never forget how to gank & you clearly want highsec to be safe against people with negative sec.

No it wasn't and maybe you should use a little of your "reasoning" to actually make a statement that doesn't make you look like a pants-on-head Rtard.

Try dawdling on a hisec gate in a system for which your sec-status is too low to travel un-restricted.

Yes, the faction-piggies very helpfully web you right into warp, if you're already aligning/warping, but if you're not, then they next point you, after which, rest assured, they will make very quick work of you.

Also, any player can attack you -- and if you're below -5.00 security status, then they can also pod-kill you with impunity -- with the NPC police on their side.

no i want players to have to rat their status back up if they want to suicide gank.

Meaning you want highsec to be safe from players with negative sec.