EVE Search - Will there be Tech 3 battlecruisers at some point?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Will there be Tech 3 battlecruisers at some point?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Sky Orcagna	Posted - 2010.10.11 20:07:00 - [1] Has CCP said anything about future plans for Tech 3?
Snowmann	Posted - 2010.10.11 20:09:00 - [2] Frigates Soon(tm), and BS were talked about. They had orginally planed on releasing Frigates, Cruisers, and Battleships all at once, but decided against it.
Stick Cult	Posted - 2010.10.11 20:11:00 - [3] Frigates are next in line, but we still have no idea when. Battleships I assume eventually, and probably battlecruisers. Originally by: CCP Tuxford my bad. Rest assured I'm being ridiculed by my co-workers.
Tal'sung	Posted - 2010.10.11 20:12:00 - [4] Ahhhh T3 Battleships... 2000 dps gank with just t2 mods, dibs.
Nobzy	Posted - 2010.10.11 20:17:00 - [5] Is there any justifiable reason to have even more end game ships that will blow everything below them out of the water? New content and new toys is all good and sweet of course, but if we think this from the perspective of a new player... finding new roles to fill for more of higher tech ships isn't going to go as planned. It'll just be "the bigger and more skill intensive the better, so long newbies".
Shazi Mavox	Posted - 2010.10.11 20:21:00 - [6] Meh, i hope they add some more versatility to the existing cruisers first... I wouldn't mind a mining subsystem... or a cargohold one...
Muad 'dib Caldari Payable on Death	Posted - 2010.10.11 20:26:00 - [7] if its any better than a tengu in the ways i like then im in!
Elzon1	Posted - 2010.10.11 20:30:00 - [8] I think we will see new tech 3 ships when CCP release comets that "ejaculate" moon goos, otherwise they will be too expesive for regular use, whatever that might be
Snowmann	Posted - 2010.10.11 20:43:00 - [9] Originally by: Nobzy ...but if we think this from the perspective of a new player... finding new roles to fill for more of higher tech ships isn't going to go as planned. It'll just be "the bigger and more skill intensive the better, so long newbies". A new player can completely skip Tech II and go Tech III. Helping the new player was kind of the point.
Tippia Sunshine and Lollipops	Posted - 2010.10.11 20:50:00 - [10] I sure hope not. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki

Moroccan Tourist	Posted - 2010.10.11 20:57:00 - [11] Originally by: Nobzy Is there any justifiable reason to have even more end game ships that will blow everything below them out of the water? lets all play with frigs mkay ?
Idicious Lightbane Percussive Diplomacy	Posted - 2010.10.11 21:15:00 - [12] Originally by: Nobzy Is there any justifiable reason to have even more end game ships that will blow everything below them out of the water? New content and new toys is all good and sweet of course, but if we think this from the perspective of a new player... finding new roles to fill for more of higher tech ships isn't going to go as planned. It'll just be "the bigger and more skill intensive the better, so long newbies". Or... You can find said T3 BS's and probly blow him up with 5 T1 BC's with not all to high SP.
CEO 01	Posted - 2010.10.11 21:20:00 - [13] Originally by: Nobzy Is there any justifiable reason to have even more end game ships that will blow everything below them out of the water? New content and new toys is all good and sweet of course, but if we think this from the perspective of a new player... finding new roles to fill for more of higher tech ships isn't going to go as planned. It'll just be "the bigger and more skill intensive the better, so long newbies". Yea, people who say this tend to forget about the numbers game. As said before, 5 newer players in BC's could kill just about any solo ship, as long as they don't act like new players Closest thing I've ever seen to a solopwn was a domi & cane taking out an 8 man BC + HIC gatecamp. But it was only because a) the cane and domi were pro-fit and flown by pros, and b) the 8 man camp was completely noob fail fit and flown by noobs.
Aranial Gallente Empyrean Warriors The Obsidian Front	Posted - 2010.10.11 21:30:00 - [14] Originally by: Tal'sung Ahhhh T3 Battleships... 2000 dps gank with just t2 mods, dibs. Thats just called a plated Megathron with Ogre II's . Saying that T3 BS' are going to have to be huge! T3 Cruisers are very big compared to T1/T2 cruisers so will be interesting to see how it pans out .
Lost Greybeard	Posted - 2010.10.11 21:34:00 - [15] Originally by: Snowmann Originally by: Nobzy ...but if we think this from the perspective of a new player... finding new roles to fill for more of higher tech ships isn't going to go as planned. It'll just be "the bigger and more skill intensive the better, so long newbies". A new player can completely skip Tech II and go Tech III. Helping the new player was kind of the point. If they retain the "**** this moon mining nonsense" part of the t3 cruisers but take out the "screw you, you die in this and we take off two weeks of training time" aspect of it so that they can be flown in PvP without extreme overconfidence, CCP will finally have convinced me to seriously get my crafting skills up. --- If you outlaw tautologies, only outlaws will have tautologies. ~Anonymous
Rashmika Clavain Gallente	Posted - 2010.10.11 21:34:00 - [16] Well I'd like to see CCP finish off the current T3 content they have implemented before releasing more half finished tat.
Jennifer Starling	Posted - 2010.10.11 21:40:00 - [17] I don't want new ships. I want more and more challenging content - like good enemy AI - and balanced fights. More ships aren't going to improve the game in any way, I want more quality, not quantity.
Riaqu	Posted - 2010.10.11 21:42:00 - [18] Greater versatility (i.e. very role specific ships) would be a good thing, but simply more tank & gank would be bad. What would be the point of introducing simply better & better ships, thereby reducing the purpose of already existing ones? It would make the differences between hardcore (ISK rich) gamers and more casual gamers even greater.
Brian Ballsack	Posted - 2010.10.11 21:58:00 - [19] Originally by: Jennifer Starling I don't want new ships. I want more and more challenging content - like good enemy AI - and balanced fights. More ships aren't going to improve the game in any way, I want more quality, not quantity. Wasting time programming better AI in a pvp game would be a complete waste, the sleeper ai is fine just move that to other parts of the game.
Elgaris Dukor Caldari Femti Runa Eru ParadoXon Alliance	Posted - 2010.10.11 23:10:00 - [20] Originally by: Sky Orcagna Has CCP said anything about future plans for Tech 3? Not so soon. CCP is currently working on a 3D-Chatroom for us and spends about 80% of the resources for that Task. The rest writes dev blogs about stuff.

ivar R'dhak	Posted - 2010.10.12 10:17:00 - [21] Edited by: ivar R''dhak on 12/10/2010 10:19:35 Edited by: ivar R''dhak on 12/10/2010 10:19:00 Originally by: Lost Greybeard Originally by: Snowmann Originally by: Nobzy ...but if we think this from the perspective of a new player... finding new roles to fill for more of higher tech ships isn't going to go as planned. It'll just be "the bigger and more skill intensive the better, so long newbies". A new player can completely skip Tech II and go Tech III. Helping the new player was kind of the point. If they retain the "**** this moon mining nonsense" part of the t3 cruisers but take out the "screw you, you die in this and we take off two weeks of training time" aspect of it so that they can be flown in PvP without extreme overconfidence, CCP will finally have convinced me to seriously get my crafting skills up. Somewhat beside your point, but this "get-ganked-loose-sillz" was the main reason for my break 1-2 years ago. Getting griefed by players is one thing, griefed by devs is a whole other ballpark, and easily countered. P.S. no you can¦t get my stuff when T3 BS come out and I quit as you loose a week of skill training after a suicide lag-gank(the logs .. they show nuttin¦). Also t3 is great for noobs? Maybe the Chin isk farmer "noobs". _________________________________________________ Mal-¦Appears we got here just in a nick of time. What does that make us?¦ Zoe-`Big damn heroes sir.` Mal-¦Aint we just.¦
Aerilis Gallente Percussive Diplomacy	Posted - 2010.10.12 10:23:00 - [22] I just want my Tech2 Tier2 BCs!
Corozan Aspinall Party Time Inc.	Posted - 2010.10.12 10:26:00 - [23] Oh dear Gawd. Tech 3? Tech 4? Tech 5? Dul. Dull. Dull. All with the same model (wuth some naff ricer appendange bolted on) and just a slightly different skin. Boooooring.
Aelius Caldari Mnemonic Enterprises	Posted - 2010.10.12 10:35:00 - [24] Originally by: Nobzy Is there any justifiable reason to have even more end game ships that will blow everything below them out of the water? New content and new toys is all good and sweet of course, but if we think this from the perspective of a new player... finding new roles to fill for more of higher tech ships isn't going to go as planned. It'll just be "the bigger and more skill intensive the better, so long newbies". The above statement is in so many ways wrong. If EVE was about 1 vs 1 PVP... then i would agree with you... In many ways a prefer wingmen with low SP's with a tech1 ship that know what they are doing to high SP's with tech3 that are completely clueless. _________________________ CSM Candidate for 2011 (soon a pretty photoshop sig) Aelius 2011 Candidacy Guide Lines
Jennifer Starling	Posted - 2010.10.12 10:37:00 - [25] Edited by: Jennifer Starling on 12/10/2010 10:38:27 Originally by: Aelius Originally by: Nobzy Is there any justifiable reason to have even more end game ships that will blow everything below them out of the water? New content and new toys is all good and sweet of course, but if we think this from the perspective of a new player... finding new roles to fill for more of higher tech ships isn't going to go as planned. It'll just be "the bigger and more skill intensive the better, so long newbies". The above statement is in so many ways wrong. If EVE was about 1 vs 1 PVP... then i would agree with you... In many ways i prefer wingmen with low SP's with a tech1 ship that know what they are doing to high SP's with tech3 that are completely clueless. Of course usually it's wingmen with high SP's with a tech3 ship that know what they are doing and low SP's with tech1 that are completely clueless.
Aelius Caldari Mnemonic Enterprises	Posted - 2010.10.12 10:50:00 - [26] Originally by: Jennifer Starling Edited by: Jennifer Starling on 12/10/2010 10:38:27 Originally by: Aelius Originally by: Nobzy Is there any justifiable reason to have even more end game ships that will blow everything below them out of the water? New content and new toys is all good and sweet of course, but if we think this from the perspective of a new player... finding new roles to fill for more of higher tech ships isn't going to go as planned. It'll just be "the bigger and more skill intensive the better, so long newbies". The above statement is in so many ways wrong. If EVE was about 1 vs 1 PVP... then i would agree with you... In many ways i prefer wingmen with low SP's with a tech1 ship that know what they are doing to high SP's with tech3 that are completely clueless. Of course usually it's wingmen with high SP's with a tech3 ship that know what they are doing and low SP's with tech1 that are completely clueless. Even a T1 ship given to a well trained low SP player can be very effective... To be competent and have fun in EVE you don't need to have T3 and 100M SP's. _________________________ CSM Candidate for 2011 (soon a pretty photoshop sig) Aelius 2011 Candidacy Guide Lines
Jennifer Starling	Posted - 2010.10.12 10:52:00 - [27] Originally by: Aelius Originally by: Jennifer Starling Edited by: Jennifer Starling on 12/10/2010 10:38:27 Originally by: Aelius Originally by: Nobzy Is there any justifiable reason to have even more end game ships that will blow everything below them out of the water? New content and new toys is all good and sweet of course, but if we think this from the perspective of a new player... finding new roles to fill for more of higher tech ships isn't going to go as planned. It'll just be "the bigger and more skill intensive the better, so long newbies". The above statement is in so many ways wrong. If EVE was about 1 vs 1 PVP... then i would agree with you... In many ways i prefer wingmen with low SP's with a tech1 ship that know what they are doing to high SP's with tech3 that are completely clueless. Of course usually it's wingmen with high SP's with a tech3 ship that know what they are doing and low SP's with tech1 that are completely clueless. Even a T1 ship given to a well trained low SP player can be very effective... To be competent and have fun in EVE you don't need to have T3 and 100M SP's. But it definitely helps. More options = more freedom = more fun.
ivar R'dhak	Posted - 2010.10.12 10:53:00 - [28] Originally by: Corozan Aspinall Oh dear Gawd. Tech 3? Tech 4? Tech 5? Dul. Dull. Dull. All with the same model (wuth some naff ricer appendange bolted on) and just a slightly different skin. Boooooring. True dat. Curse of the MoMoRPuhGuh, though. Can¦t have a gazilion different models zipping about. Keeps the lag and client size down this way. We could do with a bit more variation in the base models though, not just the slightly different LP store ones. Don¦t see why the current T3 cruiser design shouldn¦t be carried over to the frigs and eventually BS. _________________________________________________ Mal-¦Appears we got here just in a nick of time. What does that make us?¦ Zoe-`Big damn heroes sir.` Mal-¦Aint we just.¦
Noun Verber Gallente	Posted - 2010.10.12 10:53:00 - [29] They did say that they planned T3 cruisers with 5 subsystems. Maybe we'll see those some day.
HeliosGal Caldari	Posted - 2010.10.12 10:59:00 - [30] nah weve moved on t3 is dead its now sansha incursions and new pve pvp fw type of interface and melding of gameplay



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.