| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
1. Why does caldari militia fail? Your viewsplease - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Super Chair wrote: Aerilis wrote: Oh my this thread delivers. /popcorn Your internet was working long enough to load this thread? Low blow bro, low blow.
- by Aerilis - at 2012.01.01 21:59:00
|
2. Why does caldari militia fail? Your viewsplease - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Oh my this thread delivers. /popcorn
- by Aerilis - at 2011.12.31 22:07:00
|
3. CCP: An idea about how to efficiently gift remaps. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Disclaimer: This is just an idea I had. I am not an expert in the matter of attributes and remaps and redeemables. It may be pants-on-head ******** for all I know. I was just thinking to myself how would I handle the issue of bonus remaps if I wa...
- by Aerilis - at 2011.12.13 15:41:00
|
4. Tier 3 BC's - Thoughts? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
So now that we've had some time to play with them and shoot stuff on TQ, what are people thoughts about the tier 3's? Naga - Now that rails are viable, the Naga makes a beastly sniping rail platform. I love it. Talos - Brutix version 2.0, melts f...
- by Aerilis - at 2011.12.07 22:10:00
|
5. Sticky:New Chronicle: Particle Tracks - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Incredible! The techno-economic-political mumbo-jumbo was a bit hard to digest, but I love the style and the way you guys are implementing game changes into chronicles. Keep them coming!
- by Aerilis - at 2011.12.07 19:20:00
|
6. 7 weeks in the crucible is impressive, what will 6 months bring? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Crucible is more than I would have dared hope for given the small timeframe, but CCP finally DELIVERED. Do I dare get my hopes up for 6 months of dev resources committed to the same? Not yet, but I'm cautiously optimistic.
- by Aerilis - at 2011.12.04 00:53:00
|
7. Tilted Stargates - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well orienting bookmarks to the closest celestial wouldn't work , as people have bookmarks for things like "warp in at 100 from x gate". The only bookmarks that would get messed up really are instas, and you can just remake those.
- by Aerilis - at 2011.12.03 02:01:00
|
8. Amarr needs overhaul - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
As far as racial traits go, Amarr ships are tough and slow. Which means ****** frigs and awesome capitals. That's all there is to it.
- by Aerilis - at 2011.12.02 15:56:00
|
9. Let me tell you why people are killing highsec miners. A manifesto. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I have no idea whether I just read the most brilliant self-satirizing troll novel ever, or the extended rantings of a seriously deluded and ******** individual. Either way, color me entertained :3 edit: it also seems like nobody in this thread ha...
- by Aerilis - at 2011.12.02 10:49:00
|
10. Tilted Stargates - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Are awesome! I thought it was a trivial change and didn't give more than a "meh" when I saw it in the patch notes, but actually flying up to one of these things in game is a totally new experience. Maybe it's because we're so used to the flat star...
- by Aerilis - at 2011.12.02 10:35:00
|
11. IDEA create a solo PVP only system CCP! - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Putting limitations on PvP in the "real" Eve world? No way, goes against the very spirit of Eve. What would be cool though, is if there was some kind of simulator or sport/arena like feature. Make a big event of it sponsored by a NPC corp or some...
- by Aerilis - at 2011.12.01 02:26:00
|
12. My Crucible Dilemna - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Everything is so pretty! Wow Tier 3 BCs! Wow engine trails! Wow nebulas and starfields! And hybrids! They're good again! But... Skyrim... But... Eve... But... Dragons... At least during Incarna I didn't have anything to interrupt my Skyrim tim...
- by Aerilis - at 2011.11.30 04:24:00
|
13. Tier 3 BC's - Don't Pigeonhole Them! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alara IonStorm wrote: Aerilis wrote: That's actually pretty much what I'm afraid of, I don't want these to JUST be snipers. WTF are you talking about. No one said they would be Snipers. Torps, Auto's, Megapulse, Blasters all fit too. If ...
- by Aerilis - at 2011.10.21 22:15:00
|
14. Tier 3 BC's - Don't Pigeonhole Them! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: One word: Snipers. That's what comes to my mind. Big glass guns using speed, low signature and distance as a defense. That's actually pretty much what I'm afraid of, I don't want these to JUST be snipers.
- by Aerilis - at 2011.10.21 21:33:00
|
15. Tier 3 BC's - Don't Pigeonhole Them! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
First let me say the new BCs sound AWESOME. The Tornado is pure sex, and I'm sure the other ships will look amazing too. And battleship guns?? F'in win. I just wanted to make one suggestion, and I hope CCP hears this and considers it before they ...
- by Aerilis - at 2011.10.21 21:22:00
|
16. Do prefer the ship spinning screen or the captain's quarters screen? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ship spinning x100
- by Aerilis - at 2011.10.19 09:51:00
|
17. gallente won - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I pooped a little.
- by Aerilis - at 2011.10.07 09:01:00
|
18. Establishments in Winter 2011 Expansion, yes or no? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The problem here is that you are one of the very small minority that has more than a passing interest in Incarna. CCP was slated to push forward Incarna features and introduce establishments in the winter expansion, but (fortunately) have reconsid...
- by Aerilis - at 2011.10.07 06:51:00
|
19. Announcement:CCP Phantom checking in - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'll play Go with you :D
- by Aerilis - at 2011.10.07 06:11:00
|
20. Describe your response to the new Dev Blogs in exactly two words. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cautiously Optimistic.
- by Aerilis - at 2011.10.05 19:02:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |