Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spurty
Caldari D00M. Northern Coalition.
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 17:04:00 -
[91]
Originally by: Flinx Evenstar
You know it's pretty easy to look at the tickers on the overview without having the need for blue standings at all.
Someone has never had 500+ reds on his overview. Good luck with that chuck.
Yelp!
|
SwindonBadger
Gallente 0utbreak
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 17:19:00 -
[92]
Eat Them all, let the digestion sort em out |
El Muchacha
Minmatar Phathcom Enterprises
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 17:23:00 -
[93]
Just by reading 4 pages of totally legit responses. It may not be that bad of an idea for CCP to reach out to the OP in the hopes that maybe it could improve the game. Has CSM really come up with that great of ideas? I mean really have they? Look where the game is right now. It's all a joke. Everyone on here knows that what is being complained about is totally legit and great points plus the OP has the employment history/kb stats to maybe actually know what in the hell is going on and could provide insight. There are hundreds of GOOD players right now that feel like they have been there and done that and then lose interest much like the OP and end up leaving.
|
Minigin
Caldari Trinity Corp WE FORM VOLTRON
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 21:45:00 -
[94]
Edited by: Minigin on 22/10/2010 21:51:01
Originally by: Vuk Lau Just as a quick comment. Its only a myth that 0.0 alliances are rich. Some of the yeah, esp the old ones (or the new ones but with old corps) but you would be amazed to realize how many 0.0 alliances even big ones have issues with funding their operations. Even if you think that isk is not an issue for 0.0 conflicts it actually is.
Looking from our bittervet POW loosing several battleships/hacs/caps in a row is maybe not an issue but for a lot of John Doe 0.0 pilots it is. From the other side I agree that there are huge amounts of isk in the game, and CCP is aware of that, but source for that isk is not 0.0, IMHO the broken link in the chain is empire which generates abnormal amount of isk for...lets say minimal isk. W Now the balancing problem is that the easiest way should be to lower highsec isk mission income, but that will never happen cause we would have pubbie riots. From the other hand increasing the costs of living in 0.0 would make even harder for smaller and poorer entities to venture into it.
The biggest problem is that believe it or not the vast of 0.0 is completely unpopulated or unused. There is no easy way to solve that, esp. with current mechanics and i dont see that changed anytime soon. What I proposed and I am sure it would bring more people into 0.0 and would spice things a bit is implementing more 0.0 entry points but from lowsec or even highsec deep into 0.0 which would make some current ****holes and anuses of EVE actually places with much more traffic.
you know the funny part... you could be the knight in shining armour, come down to save this game and fight the hordes of blobbers...
ha who am i kidding. you are just as selfish as the rest of your coalition, perhaps moreso.
Originally by: Spurty
Originally by: Flinx Evenstar
You know it's pretty easy to look at the tickers on the overview without having the need for blue standings at all.
Someone has never had 500+ reds on his overview. Good luck with that chuck.
actually, this guy probably is used to not having to see blue/red standings "we arnt blue to the nc but you cant shoot them" and what not.
im for removing standings from this game btw... what a stupid mechanic. . THE ORIGINAL COLOUR POSTER!
Revisal > Nice job trying to troll me but luckily I'm smarter than you. :D |
Minigin
Caldari Trinity Corp WE FORM VOLTRON
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 21:56:00 -
[95]
Originally by: El Muchacha Edited by: El Muchacha on 22/10/2010 17:28:02 Just by reading 4 pages of totally legit responses. It may not be that bad of an idea for CCP to reach out to the OP or some other vet in the hopes that maybe it could improve the game. Has CSM really come up with that great of ideas? I mean really have they? Look where the game is right now. It's all a joke. Everyone on here knows that what is being complained about is totally legit and great points plus the OP has the employment history/kb stats to maybe actually know what in the hell is going on and could provide insight. Get 5 guys like him together to just sit down and come up with a game plan and good things would happen. There are hundreds of GOOD players right now that feel like they have been there and done that and then lose interest much like the OP and end up leaving.
btw you accidentalied the point hammer nail thing.
the people voted into csm are people like vuk lau (eg. people who can use their positions as leaders of massive coalitions to be voted into csm time and time again) and lets face it... whats the incentive of a player whos power is completely reliant on how many people follow his orders (litteraly) to break down that power.
if ccp is serious about assembling a player council they will find players with an understanding of this game (for instance someone who actually knows a damned thing about pvp in this game - which until recently i believed to be the centre piece of eve) and they wont care how many "votes" they got they will listen to what they have to say.
the best part is you dont need to fly over people with a true commitment to making this game better, im sure they would be happy to correspond with ccp online.
but by all means, keep on flying the same people to iceland every year, and you can wonder why nothing good will come of csm. . THE ORIGINAL COLOUR POSTER!
Revisal > Nice job trying to troll me but luckily I'm smarter than you. :D |
Sverige Pahis
Caldari Random Selection. Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 23:30:00 -
[96]
I think I can hear your dad shouting on you. Whoa don't cry buddy!
|
Admiral Heihachiro
Caldari Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse True Reign
|
Posted - 2010.10.23 03:12:00 -
[97]
Sure is a lot of bitter in this thread.
|
NAFnist
Caldari Dark Knights of Deneb Iberians.
|
Posted - 2010.10.23 03:54:00 -
[98]
Just allow bomber to fit citadel-torps, and intruduce a cruiser-size bomber for caps
Tyvm
|
Zoon Muidac
Gallente Reverse Psychology. BAT PHONE
|
Posted - 2010.10.23 07:56:00 -
[99]
Can I have your stuff thx.
|
Vuk Lau
|
Posted - 2010.10.23 09:52:00 -
[100]
Originally by: Minigin Edited by: Minigin on 22/10/2010 21:51:01
Originally by: Vuk Lau Just as a quick comment. Its only a myth that 0.0 alliances are rich. Some of the yeah, esp the old ones (or the new ones but with old corps) but you would be amazed to realize how many 0.0 alliances even big ones have issues with funding their operations. Even if you think that isk is not an issue for 0.0 conflicts it actually is.
Looking from our bittervet POW loosing several battleships/hacs/caps in a row is maybe not an issue but for a lot of John Doe 0.0 pilots it is. From the other side I agree that there are huge amounts of isk in the game, and CCP is aware of that, but source for that isk is not 0.0, IMHO the broken link in the chain is empire which generates abnormal amount of isk for...lets say minimal isk. W Now the balancing problem is that the easiest way should be to lower highsec isk mission income, but that will never happen cause we would have pubbie riots. From the other hand increasing the costs of living in 0.0 would make even harder for smaller and poorer entities to venture into it.
The biggest problem is that believe it or not the vast of 0.0 is completely unpopulated or unused. There is no easy way to solve that, esp. with current mechanics and i dont see that changed anytime soon. What I proposed and I am sure it would bring more people into 0.0 and would spice things a bit is implementing more 0.0 entry points but from lowsec or even highsec deep into 0.0 which would make some current ****holes and anuses of EVE actually places with much more traffic.
you know the funny part... you could be the knight in shining armour, come down to save this game and fight the hordes of blobbers...
ha who am i kidding. you are just as selfish as the rest of your coalition, perhaps moreso.
Nevertheless I know you still love me, and one day when you see the fruit of my hard work you will love me even more.
|
|
Minigin
Caldari Trinity Corp WE FORM VOLTRON
|
Posted - 2010.10.23 11:26:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Vuk Lau
Originally by: Minigin Edited by: Minigin on 22/10/2010 21:51:01
Originally by: Vuk Lau Just as a quick comment. Its only a myth that 0.0 alliances are rich. Some of the yeah, esp the old ones (or the new ones but with old corps) but you would be amazed to realize how many 0.0 alliances even big ones have issues with funding their operations. Even if you think that isk is not an issue for 0.0 conflicts it actually is.
Looking from our bittervet POW loosing several battleships/hacs/caps in a row is maybe not an issue but for a lot of John Doe 0.0 pilots it is. From the other side I agree that there are huge amounts of isk in the game, and CCP is aware of that, but source for that isk is not 0.0, IMHO the broken link in the chain is empire which generates abnormal amount of isk for...lets say minimal isk. W Now the balancing problem is that the easiest way should be to lower highsec isk mission income, but that will never happen cause we would have pubbie riots. From the other hand increasing the costs of living in 0.0 would make even harder for smaller and poorer entities to venture into it.
The biggest problem is that believe it or not the vast of 0.0 is completely unpopulated or unused. There is no easy way to solve that, esp. with current mechanics and i dont see that changed anytime soon. What I proposed and I am sure it would bring more people into 0.0 and would spice things a bit is implementing more 0.0 entry points but from lowsec or even highsec deep into 0.0 which would make some current ****holes and anuses of EVE actually places with much more traffic.
you know the funny part... you could be the knight in shining armour, come down to save this game and fight the hordes of blobbers...
ha who am i kidding. you are just as selfish as the rest of your coalition, perhaps moreso.
Nevertheless I know you still love me, and one day when you see the fruit of my hard work you will love me even more.
you are not wrong that i would love you, but lets face it... you have had what 3 years on csm? and nothing has really changed. the thing that gets me is you have/had the power to change a lot in eve before you became csm... yet you do nothing but reinforce the nature of this game.
dont pretend you are helping, do it! then i truely would appreciate your efforts. but as it is now... all i see you doing is coming here on the forums and talking **** about how you want the game to improve and how ccp ignores you, yet practically you dont want the game to change. if you honestly did... you could change it.
and no im not intersted in your excuses about why you have no choice and all this garbage about the other side... there is no other side. there is you and your choice, and you have made it time and time again. . THE ORIGINAL COLOUR POSTER!
Revisal > Nice job trying to troll me but luckily I'm smarter than you. :D |
fpshacker
Gallente Zor Industries Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2010.10.23 18:09:00 -
[102]
I agree with minigin, people like vuk lau only get voted in because they have a whole coalition of terrible scrubs who will vote for them regardless. From what ive heard Vuk lau hasn't contributed anything to CSM and tried to steal Mazzilu's laptop to try and get The Sphere.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |