Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
198
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:40:00 -
[31] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:Urgg Boolean wrote:OP :: do you have the before and after numbers? I'm on SiSi now and seems like my Mack yesterday had 10K more EHP, but I did not write it down as I thought yesterday's tankage was the final rev.
Real numbers please ? (If you have them.)
If what you say is true, then I wasted my money, because I bought 3 Macks expecting to get the tank that was on SiSi yesterday... Stupid me for not waiting until the changes made it onto TQ ... or for trusting CCP I suppose. I didn't wrote them down myselfs too, but yes, Mackinaw got another nerf with todays patch. Sincerly Andre Jean Sarpantis ( Roleplayed nephew from the Serpentis founder ) I found where I posted the original SiSi Mack #'s I got : here. The CPU/cap are unchanged so I can't easily build a better tank. The base stats are nerfed.
Basically, when I first tested, the EHP was 48K to 53K depending on toon/skills (fleeted without Orca).
Right now n SiSi, the same fleet gets 32K - 33K with same toons/loadouts, no Orca buffs. And only 30K if not fleeted. So much for "solo" mining. 30K EHP is relatively cheap to gank, although maybe not a single destroyer.
Sheetyeah - major nerf for miners ... before it ever made it to TQ. We all expected the Hulk to continue to be a paper tank, but they said that. For the Mack the key word was "solo". Well, not really with only a 29K-30K tank.
I guess it's disappointing because if this were really "balancing", they'd let us test things out for a while on TQ. If it was found to be truly unbalanced on TQ, THEN make the adjustments. And CCP even said : suicide ganking was never intended to be a profitable mini profession, which was one of the major reasons for the balancing changes.
Let's wait and see how well the new Mack holds up on TQ. My corp's mining fleet will be available right after the patch on Wednesday if any gankers want to take a shot at us. I'll post any results. I think it's gonna be Macks 4TW.
As for the hulk, I don't think I'll ever fly one again, even in a fleet. They are still wildly under-tanked and now, very inconvenient to use. Hulks :: 4TL. |

Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
198
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:46:00 -
[32] - Quote
Sorry for posting back2back.
There is another issue with Macks. The rigs are a big part of the tank. So if you mine Ice, you replace a tank rig with an Ice rig. So mining ice in the current revision of the Mack is a dangerous buisiness. Ice Macks are not for the solo miner as the new ship role is supposed to be. Only way I can see to make survivable solo, is to fleet them up... Yah, incompatible with defined role...
|

baltec1
Bat Country
1818
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:47:00 -
[33] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:sucks that ccp decided not to protect the d-bags who prefer zero risk "gameplay", like mining, just because they cried. Well Richard, to let me make it clear, the Miner Asked since years and days for a overhaul from the Mining barges which was allready overdue to the plain fact, Other ships ( Combat ships especially Destroyers ) got rebalanced allready in a way so they are more effective also weapons as well, but Mining ships and other industrials are stagnant since years. So CCP brougth finally the changes, but after the big Whinning occoured on the Forums by the Gankers they quickly turned around and mostly weakened their first changes to the current level as i allready said, a level which is regarding to Hulk and Mack just laughable and more a nerf then a buff. Anyways, i'm outta here and let you brickheads continue your flaming. Sincerly Andre Jean Sarpantis ( Roleplayed nephew from the Serpentis founder )
Use the skiff? Thats whats its built for. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1241
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:49:00 -
[34] - Quote
Urgg Boolean wrote: The rigs are a big part of the tank. So if you mine Ice, you replace a tank rig with an Ice rig. Ooooohhhhhhhh.
I see the problem here. You should have the tank added as a buff, right? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

baltec1
Bat Country
1818
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:50:00 -
[35] - Quote
Urgg Boolean wrote:Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:Urgg Boolean wrote:OP :: do you have the before and after numbers? I'm on SiSi now and seems like my Mack yesterday had 10K more EHP, but I did not write it down as I thought yesterday's tankage was the final rev.
Real numbers please ? (If you have them.)
If what you say is true, then I wasted my money, because I bought 3 Macks expecting to get the tank that was on SiSi yesterday... Stupid me for not waiting until the changes made it onto TQ ... or for trusting CCP I suppose. I didn't wrote them down myselfs too, but yes, Mackinaw got another nerf with todays patch. Sincerly Andre Jean Sarpantis ( Roleplayed nephew from the Serpentis founder ) I found where I posted the original SiSi Mack #'s I got : here. The CPU/cap are unchanged so I can't easily build a better tank. The base stats are nerfed. Basically, when I first tested, the EHP was 48K to 53K depending on toon/skills (fleeted without Orca). Right now n SiSi, the same fleet gets 32K - 33K with same toons/loadouts, no Orca buffs. And only 30K if not fleeted. So much for "solo" mining. 30K EHP is relatively cheap to gank, although maybe not a single destroyer. Sheetyeah - major nerf for miners ... before it ever made it to TQ. We all expected the Hulk to continue to be a paper tank, but they said that. For the Mack the key word was "solo". Well, not really with only a 29K-30K tank. I guess it's disappointing because if this were really "balancing", they'd let us test things out for a while on TQ. If it was found to be truly unbalanced on TQ, THEN make the adjustments. And CCP even said : suicide ganking was never intended to be a profitable mini profession, which was one of the major reasons for the balancing changes. Let's wait and see how well the new Mack holds up on TQ. My corp's mining fleet will be available right after the patch on Wednesday if any gankers want to take a shot at us. I'll post any results. I think it's gonna be Macks 4TW. As for the hulk, I don't think I'll ever fly one again, even in a fleet. They are still wildly under-tanked and now, very inconvenient to use. Hulks :: 4TL.
FYI, 30k tank = at least 3 t2 tornados, something that never happens. |

Denidil
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
397
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:52:00 -
[36] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Denidil wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:feel free to show the class that killmail of a hulk by a "lolnoobship" as much as he is going over the top.. he does have a point. CCP promised to make them so they couldn't get ganked by a dessy or two.. and the first set of changes did that. then they nerfed the tanks back down into shite. except for skiff/proc Working as intended. Want the best tank? get a skiff.
Actually not working as intended per the original dev blog which said they were under tanked and that they were going to make it so that it wasn't so easy to suicide them.
still too easy to suicide them.
If you don't see a problem in 0.0 eroding into two big super-coalitions and a few hangers on in areas nobody cares about.. then you don't have brains. |

baltec1
Bat Country
1818
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:52:00 -
[37] - Quote
Urgg Boolean wrote:Sorry for posting back2back.
There is another issue with Macks. The rigs are a big part of the tank. So if you mine Ice, you replace a tank rig with an Ice rig. So mining ice in the current revision of the Mack is a dangerous buisiness. Ice Macks are not for the solo miner as the new ship role is supposed to be. Only way I can see to make survivable solo, is to fleet them up... Yah, incompatible with defined role...
How about you dont fit the ice rigs and instead fit tank rigs? |

baltec1
Bat Country
1818
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:53:00 -
[38] - Quote
Denidil wrote:baltec1 wrote:Denidil wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:feel free to show the class that killmail of a hulk by a "lolnoobship" as much as he is going over the top.. he does have a point. CCP promised to make them so they couldn't get ganked by a dessy or two.. and the first set of changes did that. then they nerfed the tanks back down into shite. except for skiff/proc Working as intended. Want the best tank? get a skiff. Actually not working as intended per the original dev blog which said they were under tanked and that they were going to make it so that it wasn't so easy to suicide them. still too easy to suicide them.
If you tank them they arnt easy to gank. Also, the skiff is the tanky one, if they could all tank as well as the skiff then whats the point of the skiff?
CCP have given you loads of options, its all up to you now. |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
22
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:59:00 -
[39] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:sucks that ccp decided not to protect the d-bags who prefer zero risk "gameplay", like mining, just because they cried.
no wonder you live on the forums, you must be shunned from any other social activity due to small brain size. Miners take zero risk? really? 
so many no life trash tossing their worthless 2 cents in every thread. thanks for making me feel better about my brain, kids. |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
106
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 22:01:00 -
[40] - Quote
step 1) read unsub threat step 2) ignore thread and poster
... making the world a better place
~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Lipbite
Express Hauler
163
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 22:05:00 -
[41] - Quote
Faith in CCP? You must be playing for less than 2 years. |

Evei Shard
108
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 22:12:00 -
[42] - Quote
So CCP meta-ganked miners.
This is a surprise because? Profit favors the prepared |

Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
198
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 22:12:00 -
[43] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:FYI, 30k tank = at least 3 t2 tornados, something that never happens. Thanks for the orientation Baltec! This is the main reason I wanted real numbers. So we could look at the situation realistically.
There is the one guy who said his Mack (I think) was only at 15K EHP. I think he must have tried to squeeze out some yield and sacrificed tank. The builds I tested in SiSi were as much tank as CPU and cap allowed for.
The Mack actually blows for yield due to CPU constraints = limited MLU's. In fact, one MLU wipes out a significant qty of EHP due again to CPU constraints, not the loss of a low slot.
So like I said, let's wait and see how the "new new" Mack holds up. I seem to be a gank magnet, so I'll post survivability results once someone makes a gank attempt. But they will face our fleet with a Perfect Orca pilot + Shield Harmonizer II + spider tanking. Somehow I have a feeling the gank teams will be looking for Hulks ... fleeted or not, Hulks are gonna go down ...
See you guys in the belts on Wednesday !!!
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1241
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 22:30:00 -
[44] - Quote
Urgg Boolean wrote:The Mack actually blows for yield due to CPU constraints = limited MLU's. In fact, one MLU wipes out a significant qty of EHP due again to CPU constraints, not the loss of a low slot. Heh. So it sounds like the balancing threw choices back at the miners...
And they took the yield. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Ludi Burek
The Player Haters Corp
137
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 22:49:00 -
[45] - Quote
So miners get huge HP buff yet are stll crying and losing faith in ccp. Interesting... it's like that manifesto writing guy was right all along  |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1243
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 22:54:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ludi Burek wrote:So miners get huge HP buff yet are stll crying and losing faith in ccp. Interesting... it's like that manifesto writing guy was right all along  Uh uh.... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
272
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:08:00 -
[47] - Quote
Ludi Burek wrote:So miners get huge HP buff yet are stll crying and losing faith in ccp. Interesting... it's like that manifesto writing guy was right all along  If the 30k number is correct then only the Skiff/Proc got any real buff as the Mack just got a portion of the hulks old role with the same tank. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1243
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:10:00 -
[48] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Ludi Burek wrote:So miners get huge HP buff yet are stll crying and losing faith in ccp. Interesting... it's like that manifesto writing guy was right all along  If the 30k number is correct then only the Skiff/Proc got any real buff as the Mack just got a portion of the hulks old role with the same tank. Isn't mack for the big ore hold, while skiff is for tank?
That makes sense then. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
607
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:21:00 -
[49] - Quote
Close your account, un-install the client, and take your unending putrid whining elsewhere.
2/10.
Next!
E:
GANK ALL THE THINGS!!!! Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1243
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:22:00 -
[50] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:Close your account, un-install the client, and take your unending putrid whining elsewhere.
2/10.
Next! 2/10 huh.
Does it really deserve such a low score? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
607
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:25:00 -
[51] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:Close your account, un-install the client, and take your unending putrid whining elsewhere.
2/10.
Next! 2/10 huh. Does it really deserve such a low score?
Actually, I was feeling generous only on account of all the responses:
No style, less originality, too overtly whiny.
Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1244
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:29:00 -
[52] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:Actually, I was feeling generous only on account of all the responses:
No style, less originality, too overtly whiny. I took a look at it again.
Yeah, you were right on. My bad. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
1184
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:34:00 -
[53] - Quote
They look fine to me.
Only issue I have is with dumb miners making life harder on the rest of us, but CCP can't patch stupid. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
272
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:38:00 -
[54] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Ludi Burek wrote:So miners get huge HP buff yet are stll crying and losing faith in ccp. Interesting... it's like that manifesto writing guy was right all along  If the 30k number is correct then only the Skiff/Proc got any real buff as the Mack just got a portion of the hulks old role with the same tank. Isn't mack for the big ore hold, while skiff is for tank? That makes sense then. If I recall correctly, when the change was first announced the Mach was supposed to have more tank than the hulk as the hulk was supposed to have the support of a fleet for protection. Not saying it's necessary considering the Skiff, but if the Hulk/Mack tanks are the same then the original statements were deviated from and you fundamentally have the "fleet protection" tank on the "solo" hull. |

Hiyora Akachi
Bling Ring Tax Evaders
65
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:42:00 -
[55] - Quote
Anyone else getting weird EHP fluctuations on TQ? Mine keeps going up or down about 10k at random. |

Spurty
D00M. Northern Coalition.
409
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:51:00 -
[56] - Quote
Stop flying mining ships and you'll never lose one.
I find this advice to be 100% reliable ---- CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |

Eternal Error
Exitus Acta Probant
108
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:57:00 -
[57] - Quote
3/10
I personally thought it was a 1/10, but you managed to get enough replies that it became clear that my initial verdict was incorrect. |

Jimmy Gunsmythe
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
108
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 02:15:00 -
[58] - Quote
Jim Era wrote:posting in a stealth eve is dying thread
Is that what this thread is about? All I knew is that I smelled alcohol and poop when I came in. I'm gonna leave before I am asked to deal with either. A good predator knows how to live in balance with his prey, lest he follow them into oblivion. |

Denidil
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
401
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 02:26:00 -
[59] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Urgg Boolean wrote:The Mack actually blows for yield due to CPU constraints = limited MLU's. In fact, one MLU wipes out a significant qty of EHP due again to CPU constraints, not the loss of a low slot. Heh. So it sounds like the balancing threw choices back at the miners... And they took the yield.
bah.. easily overcome. cpu rigs, or implant. or just good fitting skills. my mining alt is training Exhumers V and Mining Upgrades V .. i won't let any fit she flies go below 35k roughly. If you don't see a problem in 0.0 eroding into two big super-coalitions and a few hangers on in areas nobody cares about.. then you don't have brains. |

Russell Casey
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
182
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 02:30:00 -
[60] - Quote
Figures. Even when they get a near dedicated patch, miners still aren't happy. |
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |