| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji
590
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 16:54:00 -
[61] - Quote
Harlot Hohannson wrote: Also not everyone flies in a gang.
Ahh now we come to the crux of the matter. Well you know, get some friends. Preferably some who can fly falcons. Then your problems are moot. |

James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
2426
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 17:01:00 -
[62] - Quote
^ Or fly smartbombing ships, they don't need to lock! 
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of one man's quest to bring civilization to highsec by bumping miners out of range. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4434
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 17:01:00 -
[63] - Quote
There's ways to deal with ECM, I'm sorry that you're unwilling to use them.
Hint: it's more than just ECCM "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Xpaulusx
Naari LLC
52
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 17:02:00 -
[64] - Quote
Posting in Yet another " I'm to lazy to train ECM, to counter ECM so lets ***** thread"  |

Hauling Hal
The Black Ops Black Core Alliance
88
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 18:49:00 -
[65] - Quote
Harlot Hohannson wrote:It would seem overpowered to be able to interfere with the LOCK RANGE or 4+ ships in a single ship right?
Well how about the damn Falcon being able to almost completely remove 4+ ships from a fight whatsoever (notwithstanding smartbombs or drones that already have a target).
I am still amazed that this bullshit is allowed to go on.
ECM is so ubiquitous it's a joke. CCP really should do something about this pathetic 'chance based' (lol) mechanic.
In before all the cowards that can't handle risk come in defending overpowered mechanics. "I can't risk having someone actually fighting while I PVP".
Hello drones, hello FOF missiles, hello warp off and warp back landing on Falcon. Falcon dies or warps off, as it has bugger all tank and hates being within lock range of anything, even friendlies. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks The Marmite Collective
2260
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 18:56:00 -
[66] - Quote
Harlot Hohannson wrote:Also, well done for implying ecm is chance based. It is nigh on guaranteed to jam every time. Hmm....just as I suspected. Clueless. The Skunkworks is recruiting. -áhttps://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1540711#post1540711 |

TheBreadMuncher
Boxxed Up Industries EPIC Alliance
205
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 18:59:00 -
[67] - Quote
TraderJade wrote:I feel your pain!
if only eve had modules to counter such ships, like a module which increases your sensor strength or boost your locking range. They could be called sensor booster and maybe ECCM... but i doubt ccp would ever introduce them into the game :(
Nice. Now try besieging a POS that can lock down any ship with less than 270 sensor strength. "We will create the introduction thread if that is requested by the community. Also, we will have an ISD Seminar about the CCL team in the coming weeks in which you can ask your questions about the CCL team and provide some constructive feedback to us." - Countless pages of locked threads and numerous permabanned accounts later, change is coming. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
707
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 19:38:00 -
[68] - Quote
The obvious solution to this is to massively buff all other forms of e-war to spread out the whining more equally. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Phoenix Bibbs
First Flying Wing Inc Soldiers Of New Eve
14
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 19:48:00 -
[69] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:More ridiculous lies about how powerful ECM is posted by someone more interested in hyperbole than facts. Do you work for the republicans?
You misspelled dirty f'ing liberal democrats. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
533
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 19:48:00 -
[70] - Quote
Andski wrote:There's ways to deal with ECM, I'm sorry that you're unwilling to use them.
Hint: it's more than just ECCM
projected ECCM sig amps rigs? and so on?
Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |

Leisen
The Empire of Libria
43
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 20:18:00 -
[71] - Quote
Let's use the guns vs missiles logic.
A HURR DURR MISSILES HIT ALL THE TIME SO THEY SHOULD SUCK!
Therefore, since ECM is chance based, and damps are constant, damps should suck. Enjoy.
Might I suggest flying Caldari if you want to specialize in electronic warfare? I mean this is kind of like complaining that the Hurricane has more turrets than a Drake... |

Luna Q
ASTARTES CORP Hashashin Cartel
48
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 20:21:00 -
[72] - Quote
Sakura Kasenumi wrote:ECM is a force multiplyer much teh same as logistics. Take away theese abilities and Eve is reduced EVEN MORE to a numbers game.
A small gang with ECM can fight a lrager force. A small gang with ECM and logistics can fight an even larger force. Send a small gang with neither against a larger force and it dies almost every time unless using such tactics as kiting.
A kiting force will destroy a larger force that can not hit it. Is that overpowered? If the defending force has ecm they can force teh kiting force to leave the field or render tehm inefective, is that overpowered?
In massive fleet fights, both sides often have ECM, taking people out of the combat, is that overpowered?
ECM seems overpowered in specific circumstances, if the enemy force has ECM adn a larger number, you will be overwhelmed fast, is that overpowered? They would probably have killed your force anyway. If teh smaller force had the ECM teh battlfield is levelled. Is that overpowered?
Think about what you are saying and look at it form other angles. If you are just but hurt because someone beat you down using ECM, that isnt a reason for it to be changed, it may be a reason for you to look at your own fleet compositions though.
Harlot, I'd like to see you respond to this post with your usual "stupid defense of broken mechanic."
My guess is you are just mad because you thought you were going to get a kill, but then got killed because of falcon.
ECM already got hit with the nerf bat. Quit whining and learn to deal with it.
Luna |

Fon Revedhort
Monks of War DarkSide.
750
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 20:26:00 -
[73] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:Pestily wrote:
A falcon can fit 6 jammers no problem.
A falcon with 6 jammers has no tank and can be instapopped almost just by looking at it. Falcons can be easily overtanked by 1600mm plate, thanks to excessive powergrid they have. 14 |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
1226
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 20:26:00 -
[74] - Quote
Light switch mechanics are terrible.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Roderick Grey
House Of Serenity. Unprovoked Aggression
30
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 20:40:00 -
[75] - Quote
Why not atleast remove perma-jamming, maybe have it capped at 30secs-1min then there's a 15 second cooldown of sorts before they can continue to stop you playing. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4434
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 22:21:00 -
[76] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Andski wrote:There's ways to deal with ECM, I'm sorry that you're unwilling to use them.
Hint: it's more than just ECCM projected ECCM sig amps rigs? and so on?
drones "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Virgil Travis
Non Constructive Self Management Unified Church of the Unobligated
633
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 22:33:00 -
[77] - Quote
Phoenix Bibbs wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:More ridiculous lies about how powerful ECM is posted by someone more interested in hyperbole than facts. Do you work for the republicans?
You misspelled dirty f'ing liberal democrats.
Only republicans do that I hear. Unified Church of the Unobligated - madness in the method Mamma didn't raise no victims. |

Garreth Vlox
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
79
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 23:20:00 -
[78] - Quote
Harlot Hohannson wrote:It would seem overpowered to be able to interfere with the LOCK RANGE or 4+ ships in a single ship right?
Well how about the damn Falcon being able to almost completely remove 4+ ships from a fight whatsoever (notwithstanding smartbombs or drones that already have a target).
I am still amazed that this bullshit is allowed to go on.
ECM is so ubiquitous it's a joke. CCP really should do something about this pathetic 'chance based' (lol) mechanic.
In before all the cowards that can't handle risk come in defending overpowered mechanics. "I can't risk having someone actually fighting while I PVP".
OMG, really a "because of falcon" post in 2012? dude your late to the party just go cry in a corner somewhere. |

Garreth Vlox
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
79
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 23:38:00 -
[79] - Quote
Roderick Grey wrote:Why not atleast remove perma-jamming, maybe have it capped at 30secs-1min then there's a 15 second cooldown of sorts before they can continue to stop you playing.
I think that the main reason people think Falcons are OP is how much they matter in small engagements, let's say there's two 5 man gangs facing off, one's a nano gang with 1 Vaga, 1 Cynabal, 2 Canes and a Scimitar The other's a mixed match gang of 4 t1 frigs and a Falcon. Providing the Falcon has the correct ECM and the pilot isn't suffering from a seizure or wife aggro the frig gang would win 9/10.
To only real way to counter the Falcon is with more Falcons or just blob it, which is ********, and doesn't mean that it isn't OP.
That fleet comp should OWN 4 frigs and a falcon becasue if he jams the DPS the scimmy should keep them alive and if he jams the scimmy the one unjammed DPS boat from that list should no problem at all killing frigs. there is no way a competent group of pilots in those ships should lose to four frigates because of one falcon. Also who flies a minny only gang? you are asking for some idiot to bring a jammer boat and **** you off because its easy against single race fleets. |

Arrgthepirate
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 00:50:00 -
[80] - Quote
My favorite thing to do in a falcon is find a fight and jam both sides |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji
591
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 00:57:00 -
[81] - Quote
A wild Kitsune appears. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1278
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 01:38:00 -
[82] - Quote
Garreth Vlox wrote:Harlot Hohannson wrote:It would seem overpowered to be able to interfere with the LOCK RANGE or 4+ ships in a single ship right?
Well how about the damn Falcon being able to almost completely remove 4+ ships from a fight whatsoever (notwithstanding smartbombs or drones that already have a target).
I am still amazed that this bullshit is allowed to go on.
ECM is so ubiquitous it's a joke. CCP really should do something about this pathetic 'chance based' (lol) mechanic.
In before all the cowards that can't handle risk come in defending overpowered mechanics. "I can't risk having someone actually fighting while I PVP". OMG, really a "because of falcon" post in 2012? dude your late to the party just go cry in a corner somewhere. Har har, I saw the top and was like
AWW yeah, the good times are ~back~ Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Randomize All
State War Academy Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 10:58:00 -
[83] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:Randomize All wrote:Most game developers think "Now you are not allowed to play" is a ridiculous game mechanic.. Of course you can play. When you are jammed, you are playing - if you are being jammed it means someone else is NOT being jammed. So take one for the team, it's only 20 seconds jeez. In the meantime you could be, I dunno, burning towards the falcon so the minute the lock breaks you are on top of him and he's in range, perhaps?
Ahh, you are sooooo cuuuuute! You have decided to add in a scenario where there are other people, because it suits a point you are intending to win. Then you decided I am in a ship that can burn to the falcon, because it suits a point you are intending to win. You deliberately made it so I'm not webbed at all, because it suits a point you are intending to win. And you also decided that I am in a ship faster than a falcon, because it suits a point you are intending to win. Then you said it's only 20 seconds because again, it suits the point you are intending to win. Then you said the minute the lock breaks because, well, it's a point you are strawmanning because it's the only way you know how to "win".
Firstly, you should have said the "second the lock breaks", it makes no sense to speak of minutes when you have setup the strawman to be an event lasting 20 seconds only.
Secondly, come back after 15-25 years of education and experience, then we can talk as adults and we can make an honest assessment of just how far you've come. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Tribal Band
1025
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 11:49:00 -
[84] - Quote
TraderJade wrote:I feel your pain!
if only eve had modules to counter such ships, like a module which increases your sensor strength or boost your locking range. They could be called sensor booster and maybe ECCM... but i doubt ccp would ever introduce them into the game :(
We had our bait tempest fitted with TWO eccm in the mid slots. It still got jammed by a falcon for two straight cycles.
This happened twice again, same effect - hostiles ran away.
INB4 RNG quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Nex apparatu5
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
332
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 11:53:00 -
[85] - Quote
Randomize All wrote: You have decided to add in a scenario where there are other people, because it suits a point you are intending to win. Then you decided I am in a ship that can burn to the falcon, because it suits a point you are intending to win. And you also decided that I am in a ship faster than a falcon, because it suits a point you are intending to win.
So based on this, you either don't have a prop mod or are flying a MWD battleship solo, based on the fact you can't "burn" and are slower than a falcon.
From this information, I can conclude it's not ECM's fault you're dying, it might be a case of PEBKAC. |

Nex apparatu5
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
332
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 11:54:00 -
[86] - Quote
Also, yes ECM is a ****** mechanic. |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin
434
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 11:59:00 -
[87] - Quote
not only is the effect borked of damps vs ecm, but look at the mods and rigs available to boost them.
(also bare in mind that a sensor booster messes with damps far more effectively than eccm effects ecm)
ECM gets huge bonuses to avoid them being used on random ships, works fine on a ecm thrashers however vs frigs and other dessys.
Bonuses to damps is 5% per level on ships with role bonuses.
Rigs are 5% on top of that and there are no low slot modules to enhance it.
Damps also are scripted dividing their focus.
Now look at ecm, 10% rigs, low slot modules that also do 10% but also throw in a very nice 10% range (no idea why).
And people only wonder why damps only 'work' against ships with very low lock range to begin with and are also useless against anything that targets over 50km, in normal/average pvp combat range.
Which is all crazy when you consider a jam cycle working means a ship is fully useless for 20 seconds, where as a weak damp even from a bonuses ship with rigs to boost it more will only ever half a lock range of a target ship every time a damp is applies - leaving the target ship free to close range re-lock and kill the damp ship. http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg |

Solstice Project
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1700
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 12:12:00 -
[88] - Quote
All of you should just die in a solar flare, really. Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1285
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 12:25:00 -
[89] - Quote
Nex apparatu5 wrote:Randomize All wrote: You have decided to add in a scenario where there are other people, because it suits a point you are intending to win. Then you decided I am in a ship that can burn to the falcon, because it suits a point you are intending to win. And you also decided that I am in a ship faster than a falcon, because it suits a point you are intending to win.
So based on this, you either don't have a prop mod or are flying a MWD battleship solo, based on the fact you can't "burn" and are slower than a falcon. From this information, I can conclude it's not ECM's fault you're dying, it might be a case of PEBKAC. Ah, in the end, a resorting to the ol' "because of falcon/ECM" is never boring.
EVE Online: Tales of a Grey Bar Or: A Tale of Two Bars (ECM & your hull going red) Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Roderick Grey
House Of Serenity. Unprovoked Aggression
31
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 12:57:00 -
[90] - Quote
Garreth Vlox wrote:Roderick Grey wrote:Why not atleast remove perma-jamming, maybe have it capped at 30secs-1min then there's a 15 second cooldown of sorts before they can continue to stop you playing.
I think that the main reason people think Falcons are OP is how much they matter in small engagements, let's say there's two 5 man gangs facing off, one's a nano gang with 1 Vaga, 1 Cynabal, 2 Canes and a Scimitar The other's a mixed match gang of 4 t1 frigs and a Falcon. Providing the Falcon has the correct ECM and the pilot isn't suffering from a seizure or wife aggro the frig gang would win 9/10.
To only real way to counter the Falcon is with more Falcons or just blob it, which is ********, and doesn't mean that it isn't OP. That fleet comp should OWN 4 frigs and a falcon becasue if he jams the DPS the scimmy should keep them alive and if he jams the scimmy the one unjammed DPS boat from that list should no problem at all killing frigs. there is no way a competent group of pilots in those ships should lose to four frigates because of one falcon. Also who flies a minny only gang? you are asking for some idiot to bring a jammer boat and **** you off because its easy against single race fleets.
Lol, you do understand the most people would jam the dps then attack the scimmy, then burn down through the other ships? You obviously need further schooling in small-scale warfare.
Also, even if they didn't kill the scimmy, they're not getting OWNED, it's a stalemate. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |