| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Plentath
   |
Posted - 2011.02.23 14:10:00 -
[1]
Wow. There are two options here:
a) You bought a character you have no idea how to use.
b) Nice troll - 5/10 for good bites.
Multiple mentions of dual tanking, rainbow resists, has every faction ship under the sun but has never used them, etc.
Keep fishin'
|
Plentath
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 10:35:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Miss Xoco
In any term, better to have a omni-fit than having a wrong element. A omni tank might be unable to complete hard missions but at least the ship might not explode in less than a min and can warp out on time.
Yet you lost your ships because you did exactly this.
Quote:
Finally there seems to be 2 ways of doing it:
1. Overruler with Super omni tank, no need to check resist, just do it.
2. Every single weak T1 with 2 stacked resist hardeners on the 2 most abused spots, easy as that. Downside, always need to switch around hardeners, and take care not to make failure.
No. Aren't you listening?
Quote:
And thanks all for the T1 fits, i will probably test out such a fit aswell and maybe use for incursion
No one is this foolish.
Quote:
I would enjoy to see your "active drake fit", because no matter what i tried, even a 3 times RR repper BS with repair bonus was weaker than a passive tank, but i might be dumb, help me out.
I don't even know.
In summary, elaborate troll.
|
Plentath
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 11:36:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Miss Xoco
We have some issues with the understanding what passive or active means. For me a active tank is by using hard boosters or real reppers.
Of course you'll have issues understanding this if you arbitrarily define active / passive / buffer by whatever YOU want to see it as.
Passive - the tank recharges itself (shields) and uses zero cap
Passive (with active hardeners) - only the hardeners use cap. This is much stronger than the above in most setups, but can be neuted (not as good for wormholes)
Active - uses a combination of shield or armour reppers along with their corresponding hardeners.
Buffer - the amount of shield or armour is increased to take more total damage. Usually uses active hardeners to increase the EHP.
As for the Kronos? It doesn't need a mighty tank. It obliterates the mission space too quickly to need one.
|
Plentath
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 12:44:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Miss Xoco
Edited by: Miss Xoco on 24/02/2011 11:54:56So in that term my Drake, yes i got one too, is not passive, because i make use of "cap to shield power exchange", allowing for a much better tank but lesser cap stability.
For the sake of my curiosity - can you post this fit?
|
Plentath
|
Posted - 2011.02.28 16:59:00 -
[5]
OP: :'( Level 4 missions are too hard
Rest: Use specific hardeners, problem solved
OP : But my omni tank, blah blah, keeps failing
Rest : Then use specific hardeners
OP: But my (insert faction battleship flavor-of-the-post here) tanks xxx omni
Rest : Use specific hardeners
OP : But I don't want to, why can't I tank these?
Rest : Because you aren't using specific hardeners
.... and so on.
|
Plentath
|
Posted - 2011.03.01 13:15:00 -
[6]
No one is this stupid. No one.
Here are your resists for each faction:
Gurista/EoM: 0.75 kin/0.25 therm
Angel: 0.7 exp/0.2 kin/0.1 em
Sansha/Blood raider/Amarr empire: 0.5 em/0.5 therm
Serpentis/Caldari state: 0.5 kin/0.5 therm
Gallente federation: 0.5 kin/0.4 therm/0.1 em
Minmatar republic: 0.5 exp/0.2 em/0.2 kin/0.1 therm
Mercenaries: 0.5 therm/0.3 kin/0.1 exp/0.1 em
Rogue drones: 0.7 exp/0.2 kin/0.1 therm
Now you don't need to make a "mistaken" or post here ever again about your ******* omni tank ****
|
Plentath
|
Posted - 2011.03.02 17:15:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Miss Xoco
The difference between switching fits and switching ships? Oh there is some. By switching ships instead of fits there is following advantages:
1. Faster, Quicker, foolproof, watch its name, all have to do and then switch the ship at station.
It's quicker to dock, strip, fit, than it is to wait out the 30 second docking timer and reship. If you name your fit "guristas" (etc) then you can't go wrong.
Quote:
To exchange that every single time without making any failures, need a masterbrain
I'm not going to make any particular comment here, except to say that every other person in this thread does this. We don't get it wrong.
Your own conclusions, please.
|
Plentath
|
Posted - 2011.03.03 14:28:00 -
[8]
Well done Miss Xoco,
You clearly know better than the rest of the forum combined, so please keep on with your posting.
I will say this, I can tank most level 4's in a T1 frigate.
I can get a 3000dps tank out of a T1 battleship.
You are doing it wrong.
But, I don't care anymore. Carry on.
|
Plentath
|
Posted - 2011.03.03 17:52:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Miss Xoco
I just suggest not to spread such stuff in forum where many rookies reading it and then they think, they can just use an omni tank and then run the LV 4 with.
There.
|
Plentath
|
Posted - 2011.03.04 10:39:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Miss Xoco
EVE survival says: Damage dealt: All types (heavy Therm)
Teacher says: Use specific hardener.
Oh for pity sake. The 'specific hardener' for an omni mission, is an omni tank.
I am starting to really worry that you aren't a troll 
|
Plentath
|
Posted - 2011.03.04 12:56:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Miss Xoco
The problem isnt the possible loss, the problem is that there is more loss than gain. As a economy freak thats no good.
For you, yes, because you're doing it wrong.
Quote:
Surely trying to solve every little fit and ship
You have to change 4 modules, max. You can save your fits so this takes less than 10 seconds.
Quote:
Actually LV.4 is to less rewarding for its constantly changing special fit requirement
See above.
Quote:
thats my own opinion
The reason you hold this opinion and no-one else, is because you are doing it wrong.
Quote:
how much of preparation and carefulness it takes.
A minute. Per mission. Max.
Please go back to mining, clearly spending a minute thinking is too much, so that's a great career for you.
|
| |
|