Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Katrina Oniseki
Caldari 0rizen 0rizen Nation
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 11:45:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Katrina Oniseki on 25/06/2011 11:58:41 Are you able to give us a very loose guesstimate on when we can expect the remainder of older ships to be redesigned like the Maller and Scorpion?
I'm not looking for a set in stone date, just something rough like "possibly summer 2012". If you're able to tell, should we be expecting a bulk delivery of ships like Trinity gave us, or should we expect a trickle of ships over multiple Incarna 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 releases? (Or whatever relevant expansion name it would be, if not Incarna)
|
Milkmy Sausage
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 11:46:00 -
[2]
bump, I'd be interested too
|
Adira Hamalia
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 11:48:00 -
[3]
me too
|
|
CCP Fallout
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 11:50:00 -
[4]
I'm currently not aware of any new ship designs and am not sure if any are currently planned at this time.
Fallout Associate Community Manager CCP Hf, EVE Online Contact us |
|
Katrina Oniseki
Caldari 0rizen 0rizen Nation
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 11:55:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Katrina Oniseki on 25/06/2011 12:01:23 Edited by: Katrina Oniseki on 25/06/2011 11:56:32
Originally by: CCP Fallout I'm currently not aware of any new ship designs and am not sure if any are currently planned at this time.
I'm talking about the remodeling of the existing ships. The Maller and Scorpion received new models and textures, and the rest of the ships are being worked on. You're switching to the new PGS texture system, are you not? It was mentioned clearly in this devblog. Sure, not all the ships are going to have a whole new design, but they -all- need to be updated to work with the new thruster effects shown at Incarna login screen and turret designs in place.
I'll provide more links for you ASAP.
Originally by: CCP Spitfire Hello Katrina Oniseki,
Sorry for the late reply but yes, this is essentially correct. All ships need to be upgraded to new shaders, and they'll get the new engine effects at that time (as far as I know, at least).
From this thread here: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1533856&page=1#8
|
Maikeruko
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 11:55:00 -
[6]
More importantly, CCP Fallout, can you confirm or deny that CCP plans to move forward with MT to non-vanity items?
It's the only thing we all care about. Please make a statement on this immediately.
|
Katrina Oniseki
Caldari 0rizen 0rizen Nation
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 11:57:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Maikeruko More importantly, CCP Fallout, can you confirm or deny that CCP plans to move forward with MT to non-vanity items?
It's the only thing we all care about. Please make a statement on this immediately.
You have enough threads about that topic. Don't derail mine please.
|
Napoleon Baleine
Interstellar Exploration Initiative
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 11:58:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Maikeruko More importantly, CCP Fallout, can you confirm or deny that CCP plans to move forward with MT to non-vanity items?
It's the only thing we all care about. Please make a statement on this immediately.
Fallout doesn't have access to this information, or cannot comment on it because she has been told not to. Do you think if she had the information and was allowed to tell us by her bosses she would withhold it?
___________________________________________ Napoleon's Wormole Sales and Third Party Services |
Sarmatiko
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:05:00 -
[9]
Next update codenamed "Augustus" will provide Incarna with racial quarters hopefully. Meybe after that we will see some new redesigns in the release codenameed "Tiberius". Personally I have no idea what's up with this Roman Emperors codenames, but Caligula will be promising update if CCP will continue naming trend
|
|
CCP Fallout
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:06:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Maikeruko More importantly, CCP Fallout, can you confirm or deny that CCP plans to move forward with MT to non-vanity items?
It's the only thing we all care about. Please make a statement on this immediately.
I am truly not qualified to answer this question, sorry.
Fallout Associate Community Manager CCP Hf, EVE Online Contact us |
|
|
Uglavitch Nefrex
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:08:00 -
[11]
Has everyone forgotten they are also charging developers $99 so the developers can make the tools we use!!!!!!!
|
Varcaus
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:09:00 -
[12]
Originally by: CCP Fallout
Originally by: Maikeruko More importantly, CCP Fallout, can you confirm or deny that CCP plans to move forward with MT to non-vanity items?
It's the only thing we all care about. Please make a statement on this immediately.
I am truly not qualified to answer this question, sorry.
You could have just said yes.
|
Ayandra
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:09:00 -
[13]
You may not be authorized to do so. But you certainly must be qualified enough to give us your take on things. Which is something no one from CCP does. Please don't bring up the Zulu blog. CCP Pann never followed through, and no one else has either. |
Sathiran Endis
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:11:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Uglavitch Nefrex Has everyone forgotten they are also charging developers $99 so the developers can make the tools we use!!!!!!!
Have you forgotten EVE is probably the only major MMO that even allows 3rd parties make completely standalone tools at the expense of CCP server and bandwidth load?
More on topic: It'd be nice to see some of the cap ships redesigned as well, namely the Phoenix and Wyvern, maybe also Aeon
|
Rupert VonDraken
Resilience.
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:12:00 -
[15]
Silly OP.... CCP Dev and Artist time is far too valuable to be wasted on things like internet spaceships...
There are PANTS to be designed and sold...
|
|
CCP Fallout
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:12:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Ayandra You may not be authorized to do so. But you certainly must be qualified enough to give us your take on things. Which is something no one from CCP does. Please don't bring up the Zulu blog. CCP Pann never followed through, and no one else has either.
It truly has nothing to do with authorization or not. I'm neither on the team that handles that, nor familiar with the work that the are planning. My primary interest and focus is the community, familiarizing myself with future design and tech stuff, and the like.
Fallout Associate Community Manager CCP Hf, EVE Online Contact us |
|
cyndrogen
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:13:00 -
[17]
Originally by: CCP Fallout I'm currently not aware of any new ship designs and am not sure if any are currently planned at this time.
Interesting, so the deviant art contest was for PR?
|
Scerolikk Teromni
Atrocious Order
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:14:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Katrina Oniseki
Originally by: Maikeruko More importantly, CCP Fallout, can you confirm or deny that CCP plans to move forward with MT to non-vanity items?
It's the only thing we all care about. Please make a statement on this immediately.
You have enough threads about that topic. Don't derail mine please.
This entire board has been commandeered by the angry hordes and all threads not posted with the express purpose of discussing the topic at hand will be converted to become relevant. We apologize for the inconvenience, here's 5,000 unallocated skillpoints to spend at your leisure. --
Quote:
Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?
|
Lucilla Giulia
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:15:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Sathiran Endis
Have you forgotten EVE is probably the only major MMO that even allows 3rd parties make completely standalone tools at the expense of CCP server and bandwidth load?
have you forgotten that without those 3rd party tool EVE will be almost unplayable? du to lack of development in that direction by offical dev? sorry but that's the truth
on topic, good to see you still posting Fallout, even thou you'r paid for it, still shows some sign of activity from CCP
|
Haulin Aussie
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:15:00 -
[20]
Originally by: CCP Fallout
Originally by: Maikeruko More importantly, CCP Fallout, can you confirm or deny that CCP plans to move forward with MT to non-vanity items?
It's the only thing we all care about. Please make a statement on this immediately.
I am truly not qualified to answer this question, sorry.
Then what is your personal opinion on MT for non-vanity items in eve? Are you for or against?
|
|
HyperZerg
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:16:00 -
[21]
Nice that finally someone talks plain english without that arrogance!
Fallout, please do the community a huge favor, go over to the guy who is writing a real response to our concerns and ask him when we is done with it.
|
I Love Boobies
Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:17:00 -
[22]
Originally by: CCP Fallout I'm currently not aware of any new ship designs and am not sure if any are currently planned at this time.
Yeah, instead of developing ships and so on, they are developing ways to charge super high prices for pixels, and ways to introduce non-vanity, game breaking changes to the NEX store.
|
Holy One
Quiet.Storm Frater Adhuc Excessum
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:18:00 -
[23]
18 months.
BBQ makes me hungry for more... |
Rupert VonDraken
Resilience.
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:19:00 -
[24]
Originally by: I Love Boobies
Originally by: CCP Fallout I'm currently not aware of any new ship designs and am not sure if any are currently planned at this time.
Yeah, instead of developing ships and so on, they are developing ways to charge super high prices for pixels, and ways to introduce non-vanity, game breaking changes to the NEX store.
and pants... dont forget $1000 pants.
|
Better Than You
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:19:00 -
[25]
I think microtransactions for non-vanity items has its place in this game.
- **Friendship will always trump the desire to fight!** |
Sarmatiko
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:21:00 -
[26]
Originally by: cyndrogen
Originally by: CCP Fallout I'm currently not aware of any new ship designs and am not sure if any are currently planned at this time.
Interesting, so the deviant art contest was for PR?
IIRC there was answer from CCP Hammer that Tornado will be released this year in winter expansion. You should check answers thread for quotes.
|
Klebzellok
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:22:00 -
[27]
Originally by: CCP Fallout It truly has nothing to do with authorization or not. I'm neither on the team that handles that, nor familiar with the work that the are planning. My primary interest and focus is the community, familiarizing myself with future design and tech stuff, and the like.
What do the people who do handle that say?
If your "primary interest and focus is the community" then you must surely have brought this issue to them ?!?
|
Andraine
Coded Arms Corp
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:24:00 -
[28]
Originally by: CCP Fallout
Originally by: Maikeruko More importantly, CCP Fallout, can you confirm or deny that CCP plans to move forward with MT to non-vanity items?
It's the only thing we all care about. Please make a statement on this immediately.
I am truly not qualified to answer this question, sorry.
Saying its the only thing we all care about is total rubbish. It's fair to say 90% of the people posting on this forum right now are idiots. yobo |
Scarlet des Loupes
Gallente University of Caille
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:24:00 -
[29]
Originally by: CCP Fallout It truly has nothing to do with authorization or not. I'm neither on the team that handles that, nor familiar with the work that the are planning. My primary interest and focus is the community, familiarizing myself with future design and tech stuff, and the like.
You never talk to your collegues at CCPs?
|
Bob the'Cyno
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 12:25:00 -
[30]
Originally by: CCP Fallout I'm currently not aware of any new ship designs and am not sure if any are currently planned at this time.
Someone had a bad day it seems. Sorry for that but your CEO is probably popping a bottle of Icelandic champagne as we speak
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |