Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 00:54:00 -
[1]
Kudos to CCP for defeating the uprising and retaining the right to break your game and wreck your company's financial future. Well played, CCP.
Here are 10 reasons (in no particular order) I think we lost:
1. Lack of a coherent message by the protesters.
2. Lack of buy-in from the leadership of any large alliance or any truly charismatic/well-spoken individual capable of getting GDI buy-in (to consolidate messaging/actions.)
3. Staggered subscription expiry.
4. Skill queues and POS fuel.
5. Prisoner's dilemma. (free riders)
6. EVE's ingrained culture of trolls and fanbois (plus the ability to post anonymously.)
7. The lack of alternative engaging sandbox games.
8. CSM willing to be bought off for a few drinks.
9. Large portion of the playerbase (including Mynxee! ) willing to be bought off with a few almost-meaningless words.
10. CCP stall tactics and counterintelligence/war propaganda (via dev alts)
Did I miss any?
Want to buy a monocle? |
baltec1
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 00:56:00 -
[2]
It stopped because the bulk of us didnt want none vanity items. CCP has now said the will not go down that road so we are happy again.
Its as simple as that.
|
Mars Theran
Caldari EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:06:00 -
[3]
I think you missed the part where other players, (not Dev alts), like myself worked for and against you in an attempt to balance things out and put out the fires, while still allowing you to get the point across. While some of us were wholly on the other side, others of us agreed in part with many of the opinions presented, but neither liked or saw any need for the flames and trolling that were happening.
Oh.. and yeah, you might also have missed the part where you won, you daft punk.
Maybe not to your liking, or in accordance with your extremist principles, but both protest and community uprising had the intended affect, and galvanized both the Dev's and CSM to work things out on your behalf. Maybe you missed it.
Else, end if, quit trolling.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:07:00 -
[4]
AkJon, you speak 100% for me, only you say it better.
i agree 100% with this thread, time will tell how this ends up, but it was disappointing to see the community so easily pacified, admittedly a lot of the more vocal & articulate critics have been silenced by bans, subs running out or just sheer loss of interest.
I too will be gone soon, I almost hope you keep paying & playing to represent me and many more like me within the game & here on these boards.
Players deserve to hear the full story, and the opposing voices, sadly, are disappearing, leaving Mono***s & fanbois/ALTS to run amok.
Never forget EvE Players, this patch cost the Community a lot of great players & in a game like EvE the community is everything, this is unacceptable IMO, especially when it all could have been avoided if CCP didn't have their heads buried so far up their -you know what!-
Cheers to you AkJon Ferguson
|
Kuronaga
Tribal Liberation Force
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:08:00 -
[5]
What do you believe the protest was attempting to do, Ferguson?
Because I believe it succeeded.
The purpose was to shine a negative light on CCP's actions and force them into a broad public action that the entire gaming world could see.
It did that spectacularly, and regardless of their true intentions if they back out of their promises now they have this ten minute long video showcasing their treachery for all time.
This would be far more damaging then any protest, so all in all... yea, the protest worked perfectly.
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:12:00 -
[6]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Did I miss any?
Yeah, the OP is an idiot.
|
Mars Theran
Caldari EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:17:00 -
[7]
Originally by: San Severina AkJon, you speak 100% for me, only you say it better.
i agree 100% with this thread, time will tell how this ends up, but it was disappointing to see the community so easily pacified, admittedly a lot of the more vocal & articulate critics have been silenced by bans, subs running out or just sheer loss of interest.
I too will be gone soon, I almost hope you keep paying & playing to represent me and many more like me within the game & here on these boards.
Players deserve to hear the full story, and the opposing voices, sadly, are disappearing, leaving Mono***s & fanbois/ALTS to run amok.
Never forget EvE Players, this patch cost the Community a lot of great players & in a game like EvE the community is everything, this is unacceptable IMO, especially when it all could have been avoided if CCP didn't have their heads buried so far up their -you know what!-
Cheers to you AkJon Ferguson
I think I missed the part where you were disappearing. j/k
|
Zero GodOfDestruction
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:17:00 -
[8]
I disagree with #7
Perpetuum online- I've been playing it since last week, and to be perfectly honest, I like better than eve. This video is brilliant and is a must watch for anyone angry with what CCP has done and will do. |
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:19:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Kuronaga What do you believe the protest was attempting to do, Ferguson?
Because I believe it succeeded.
The purpose was to shine a negative light on CCP's actions and force them into a broad public action that the entire gaming world could see.
It did that spectacularly, and regardless of their true intentions if they back out of their promises now they have this ten minute long video showcasing their treachery for all time.
This would be far more damaging then any protest, so all in all... yea, the protest worked perfectly.
We do still have the public statements & Dev Blogs from a year ago telling us EvE was never going down the MT road.
So, I put little weight in the message of the statement or the Vid. We all know what CCP are capable of & how they will justify whatever they decide to do regardless of past promises.
However, i do agree with you that the outcry was not a total failure, it just wasn't the success i would have liked to see.
IMO the statement should have caused further outcry & forced CCP into a much clearer & more specific statement regarding the future of EvE, as it stands a lot of issues weren't even addressed in the statement we have now & they have dropped off the radar except for a small number of players risking all kinds of insults to try to keep them alive here. And that number of players is ever decreasing as subs run out.
I believe CCP is treating this community with total contempt & Hilmar's email confirms this, ultimately it's up to every individual player to make that judgement for themselves, what I don't like to see though is players deliberately turning a blind eye to the issues because they fear having to quit the game, that is weak & it's CCP's edge & they are using it to it's full extent.
|
Raikov Vanskenski
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:22:00 -
[10]
I don't often feel the need to call someone out for being an idiot, but given the nature of the OP's post, I feel the need to do so here.
Did you even bother to spend more than a few minutes reading the complaints posted on these forums? If you did, you would have realized that the majority of the rioting was in regards to the possibility of non-vanity items being introduced into the NeX store. Additionally, many players were unsatisfied with the absence of "ship spinning," as it cause a great deal of performance problems.
CCP addressed both of these issues, stating that non-vanity items would not make an appearance in the NeX store, and that they will eventually reintroduce a hanger view similar to that of the old version. Until this change happens, they promised to keep the "do not load captain's quarters" option in-game.
Seriously, you seem to be the type of person that complains just for the sake of complaining, rather than doing so for any legitimate reason. Less talk, more action. |
|
Mynex
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:25:00 -
[11]
The #1 concern was non-vanity micro transactions. We have been told they are not happening. We got what we(most people who were complaining) wanted. If CCP go back on this there will be mass cancellations and flaming again. But for now we got what we wanted so lets enjoy the game?
|
Raikov Vanskenski
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:26:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Mynex The #1 concern was non-vanity micro transactions. We have been told they are not happening. We got what we(most people who were complaining) wanted. If CCP go back on this there will be mass cancellations and flaming again. But for now we got what we wanted so lets enjoy the game?
Exactly. It seems like everyone except the OP realizes this. Less talk, more action. |
Kieron VonDeux
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:28:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Raikov Vanskenski I don't often feel the need to call someone out for being an idiot, but given the nature of the OP's post, I feel the need to do so here.
+1
|
Mashie Saldana
Minmatar Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:28:00 -
[14]
People who demonstrated are now unsubscribed and no longer able to post.
ÇÇP stole my heart, damn you
|
White Tree
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:31:00 -
[15]
If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it. _______________________________________
|
Reilly Duvolle
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:36:00 -
[16]
Persoanlly I resubbed because CCP has stated only vanity items for AUR. I dont have a beef with either INCARNA, the NeX store (peacocks lulz) or performance issues (yeah I play with the door).
An observation though - seeing your posting history the last few weeks - it is quite apparant that you are raging to a point where it doenst really matter what CCP or anybody else say, because you will only hear what conforms to the carefully constructed picture that fills your head. I'd step back and allow myself to breath again if I were you.
*shrugs*
|
Wes Magyar
Caldari Ex Con Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:44:00 -
[17]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
this ^
|
Terminal Insanity
Minmatar Convex Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:46:00 -
[18]
And the #1 reason why the protests failed: They were protesting over something that didnt/wasnt going to exist!
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:47:00 -
[19]
Originally by: baltec1 It stopped because the bulk of us didnt want none vanity items. CCP has now said the will not go down that road so we are happy again.
Its as simple as that.
No, they didn't. And no, it's not.
I think it's fair to say that if Incarna had been released with the option to dock-to-hangar, had included a greater variety of prices in the MT store, and had included a commitment from CCP to never sell non-vanity items or convenience or functionality EVER, it would have still been the worst 'expansion' of all time.
So no, after stalling for over a week, (and jeopardizing the mental and physical health and well-being of poor White Tree,) a toothless statement that we have no plans to sell non-vanity items in our vanity items store (which is precisely what the statement says) doesn't cut it.
"It is CCPæs plan that the Noble Exchange (NeX store) will be used for the sale of vanity items only. There are no plans, and have been no plans, as per previous communication and CSM meetings, to introduce the sale of game breaking items or enhancements in the NeX store."
Want to buy a monocle? |
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:51:00 -
[20]
Originally by: San Severina
Originally by: Kuronaga What do you believe the protest was attempting to do, Ferguson?
Because I believe it succeeded.
The purpose was to shine a negative light on CCP's actions and force them into a broad public action that the entire gaming world could see.
It did that spectacularly, and regardless of their true intentions if they back out of their promises now they have this ten minute long video showcasing their treachery for all time.
This would be far more damaging then any protest, so all in all... yea, the protest worked perfectly.
We do still have the public statements & Dev Blogs from a year ago telling us EvE was never going down the MT road.
So, I put little weight in the message of the statement or the Vid. We all know what CCP are capable of & how they will justify whatever they decide to do regardless of past promises.
However, i do agree with you that the outcry was not a total failure, it just wasn't the success i would have liked to see.
IMO the statement should have caused further outcry & forced CCP into a much clearer & more specific statement regarding the future of EvE, as it stands a lot of issues weren't even addressed in the statement we have now & they have dropped off the radar except for a small number of players risking all kinds of insults to try to keep them alive here. And that number of players is ever decreasing as subs run out.
I believe CCP is treating this community with total contempt & Hilmar's email confirms this, ultimately it's up to every individual player to make that judgement for themselves, what I don't like to see though is players deliberately turning a blind eye to the issues because they fear having to quit the game, that is weak & it's CCP's edge & they are using it to it's full extent.
I don't think you would truly be happy with any outcome.
The protest started over mainly non-vanity items that would offer an ingame advantage. Problem is CCP handled it so badly they ****ed off the protesters to such an extent that non-vanity items was not the only thing people wanted, they wanted a pound of flesh from CCP too.
Dev-blog a year ago, things can change, a company's finances can change. So I don't see that as too much of an issue where vanity items are concerned. Companies will do what they can to survive.
You don't trust CCP and even if they did give some kind of guarantee you would still not trust them.
The reason you risk insults as you put it, is you're trying to keep alive a protest when most of the people involved in the protest have left (mainly due to CCPs handling of the whole affair) or decided to give CCP the benefit of the doubt for the time being. Kind of puts you in the fanatic category.
You can't say it's up to the individual player to make a judgement for themselves and in the next breath accuse them of turning a blind eye.
At this stage all you are doing is trying to stir other people up because you want to get back at CCP. The truth is no matter what CCP say, you will not believe them. It really is a simple as that.
|
|
Mars Theran
Caldari EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:55:00 -
[21]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Originally by: baltec1 It stopped because the bulk of us didnt want none vanity items. CCP has now said the will not go down that road so we are happy again.
Its as simple as that.
No, they didn't. And no, it's not.
I think it's fair to say that if Incarna had been released with the option to dock-to-hangar, had included a greater variety of prices in the MT store, and had included a commitment from CCP to never sell non-vanity items or convenience or functionality EVER, it would have still been the worst 'expansion' of all time.
So no, after stalling for over a week, (and jeopardizing the mental and physical health and well-being of poor White Tree,) a toothless statement that we have no plans to sell non-vanity items in our vanity items store (which is precisely what the statement says) doesn't cut it.
"It is CCPæs plan that the Noble Exchange (NeX store) will be used for the sale of vanity items only. There are no plans, and have been no plans, as per previous communication and CSM meetings, to introduce the sale of game breaking items or enhancements in the NeX store."
Some people will never be happy with anything. I hate to think that CCP will take a dim view of continued BS like you're posting, and eventually decide to do as other developers do, and ignore the community entirely, while cutting off and removing any means of feedback and communication. You are spoiled! Like a child who gets ice cream whenever it cries for it; gets to stay up late, because it cries for it; gets to play video games all day, why it's mother cleans the room, spoiled.
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 01:59:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Zero GodOfDestruction I disagree with #7
Perpetuum online- I've been playing it since last week, and to be perfectly honest, I like better than eve.
I've tried it. I REALLY wanted to like it. I'm glad you do, though. But fwiu they're already talking about going the MT route as well (which is fair enough for a new game, I suppose.)
Want to buy a monocle? |
Haulie Berry
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:00:00 -
[23]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
Oh, for ****'s sake - you took an all-expenses paid trip to Iceland to meekly suggest to CCP that they should maybe consider making a vague and entirely non-committal statement to appease the angry mob. Please climb down off that cross.
|
Merouk Baas
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:01:00 -
[24]
Is "shouting at CCP" in person more effective than our shouting at them via the forums and via the (however few) cancelled subscriptions? Because, it's 2011, there's a plethora of electronic communication methods available, from webcams to voice servers to telephone to text. Whatever the reason is that they wanted you personally on site (NDA?), THAT's what you put your physical health on the back burner for.
The "problems the players had" are still there, are they not?
|
Darik Jita
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:12:00 -
[25]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
I stand with the CSM in principle, but your response, Ms. Tree, displays poor impulse control. Politicians don't ***** at their constituents (assuming they want to enjoy continued popular support).
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:13:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Merouk Baas The "problems the players had" are still there, are they not?
I'd say non-vanity items that give ingame advantages are out of the picture in the short-term. In the long-term I don't think there's any guarantees.
CSMs were elected as representatives for the community, so you should be using those CSMs to communicate with CCP.
|
Ianus
Caldari Geminus Gateway
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:15:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Mashie Saldana People who demonstrated are now unsubscribed and no longer able to post.
This is wishful thinking in general, but certainly true for some.
@OP: The protests didn't fail. The goal, as I saw it, was to raise awareness of the problems and to put some pressure in CCP by gathering media attention and otherwise being a nuisance. Players hoped putting up a show would be enough to reverse course, but they also knew (the serious ones at least) that it would ultimately be decided by how many of them stopped playing after all was said and done.
That time has come, and now its time for CCP to make their move.
Does this mean I'm happy with the outcome? Hell no, but I believe it would be worse had the protests never occured, and so I won't label them a failure. Neither do you, btw, you just wanted a catchy thread title.
|
K'iran
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:18:00 -
[28]
Edited by: K''iran on 05/07/2011 02:26:55 There's two things at work here:
First and foremost the non-vanity items.
Secondly, I'm sure there's a large group of people who feel that Hilmar's email just doesn't sit right, especially as it's not mentioned at all by CCP (CSM's harsh statement on it is a good indication of that). Combined with the gut feeling that WoD and Dust are taking away resources and dev time that could and should have been spent on EVE, there's many things which require a lot of attention DEV wise, and lots of people feel that EVE development is put on the back burner.
The first bit was addressed and "solved", as such it can be called a success. and yes the CSM (even though a particular one chose to portray it as a party) DID put in tons of personal time&effort to make it happen. The second bit keeps on lingering but ultimately wasn't what this was all about, directly. Still, it needs to be addressed and taken care of at some point.
We're not out of the woods yet and it's going to need a whole lot of verifiable commitment of CCP towards EVE (not the WoD part called Incarna) to win back what they lost, in terms of trust and all that.
|
Dasola
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:27:00 -
[29]
you think it failed, i think it was huge success..
Newer before we have seen such a strong get to gether from all walks of eve. we had highsec carebears, lowsec pirates and even 0.0 habitants participating mass protests...
We made massive headlines among gaming community in general (various websites). For good or bad, it brought problem in atention of general gaming public.
We got ccp atention in way they newer expected. CCP called emergency summit to deal with it.
We got things cleared, now we watch very very closely what ccp does. If they mess up, protests will flame up again and this time it wont be as easy to deal with.
Personally i feel its time ccp prove themself that they are now screwing us over. Talks are now over, cease fire has been declared and now we wait their actions to macth what they speak.
will be interestig to see if next QEN ever gets out of door, what impact that mass protest had on jitas daily turnover. * Revolution changes worlds * CCP, players are watching, no empty promises. |
Zeko Rena
Caldari Tankt
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:30:00 -
[30]
Hard to tell if it failed or not, if the next 8 expansions are all useless crap for station walking with nothing new for spaceships, then it failed, imo --------------------------
|
|
Rikanin
Gallente The Azerick Corporation
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:31:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Darik Jita
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
I stand with the CSM in principle, but your response, Ms. Tree, displays poor impulse control. Politicians don't ***** at their constituents (assuming they want to enjoy continued popular support).
I disagree - I thought he was KIND given the amount of unfounded accusations and overt *****iness directed at the CSM since this whole thing started. And with people like this as constituents...who'd WANT their continuing popular support?
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:35:00 -
[32]
This thread was supposed to be about WHY we lost, but given the (surprisingly?) high degree of controversy over WHETHER we lost, I suppose I should explain what winning would have looked like. Let's see if we can agree on a few facts:
For the last 8 years, EVE has been a sandbox game about Internet Spaceships and a player-driven economy with a steep learning curve and requiring a long time investment from its players/customers.
EVE has always run on low-end computers. Even by players running multiple accounts, a practice which has been encouraged in both game development and marketing by its developer, CCP games.
It has an incredible community that pays a high monthly subscription, with the average long-term player paying $50 per month or so (to support the multiple accounts I mentioned earlier.) In exchange for that high monthly subscription, EVE has traditionally offered 2 'free' expansions per year.
EVE has been and continues to be immensely profitable for its developer, CCP Games, which refers internally to EVE as its 'Golden Goose.'
Recent patches and expansions have left countless bugs, exploits, imbalances and unfinished features. EVE (Internet Spaceships) is in a state of utter neglect.
The last patch fried/overheated the video cards of a significant percentage of its customers and makes the game unplayable in multibox mode for a significantly higher percentage of its customers.
CCP Games devotes grossly inadequate financial/development resources to EVE (Internet Spaceships,) focusing instead solely on its 2 new games in development. What few resources it does devote to EVE (Internet Spaceships) are being allocated by someone who has expressed enthusiasm about breaking in-game functionality and selling it back to the players through microtransactions.
Hopefully we can agree on those facts. Now here's what winning looks like (from my perspective:)
CCP commits permanently to making Incarna optional.
CCP commits permanently to keeping $ for GTC for PLEX the only MT in the game.
CCP removes Aurum from the game.
CCP agrees that since we have paid for 2 expansions per year with our inflated monthly subscription, and since this expansion is all about Spaceship Barbies, that they will allow us to play dressup with our Spaceship Barbies for 'free' (since we've already paid for it with our inflated monthly subscription.)
CCP acknowledges that Hilmar's idea to gouge players because he saw a slideshow on the Internets about gouging players in a F2P game doesn't work in the industry's most expensive subscription-based MMO.
CCP restores adequate funding to EVE development (Internet Spaceships.)
CCP regains the respect and trust of its playerbase, and goes on to great financial success from its 2 new games, which can operate on whatever financial model Hilmar dreams up because they are new games with no established precedents/understandings.
That's what winning would look like (more or less). It's a little rough, but give me a week to fly to Iceland and I'd polish it up a bit.
Or just get me drunk and tell me you have no plans to sell non-vanity items in your vanity items store. I'm good with that.
Want to buy a monocle? |
Charlotte The Harlot
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:41:00 -
[33]
The top reason and ONLY reason why you idiots lost before you began is..EvE owns your skinny little pixelated a$$ and can do with it as they please..*know what I mean /wink *
|
Ianus
Caldari Geminus Gateway
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:45:00 -
[34]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson (...) CCP removes Aurum from the game (...)
la la land
|
stoicfaux
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:49:00 -
[35]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Did I miss any?
What's your definition of failure? What goals should have been met for the protests to be considered a success?
Even then, your top ten list comes across as just random crud from someone with a tenuous grasp on reality. Dev alts? Seriously? Were they also posting from black NWO computers via secret routers transmitting on dark fiber? Also, Glenn Beck called and wants to remind you that he will be on GBTV in the future.
----- Request for Eve Development Roadmap. Let CSM know that we want one.
|
Snake Scofield
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:50:00 -
[36]
When people think back to the G20 protests, what do they remember?
Riots, vandals, zealots, mob mentality. What did they actually accomplish?
How will the EvE protests be remembered? Do you really want to play some word association for eve protestors? What did you accomplish? It was stated before the CSM meeting that there were no plans for MT in multiple dev blogs. And after the meeting? No plans for MT.
Viva la revolucion! Power to the people!
|
Lilith Velkor
Minmatar Heretic Army B A N E
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:52:00 -
[37]
Just because the majority of players was against non-vanity MT items doesnt mean they did support every stupid whine people came up with.
Speaking for myself, the only thing that I cared about was the issue mentioned above. I couldnt give two ****s about spinning ships, monocles or other such nonsense.
Overall, I'm actually pretty happy with the expansion. Turrets are looking better, QC is kinda low on actual content but still better than looking at a hangar all day, and my 8 year old rig doesnt have heat issues either.
Stop whining, nobody cares about the fart you have stuck sideways tbh.
|
Milken Gekko
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 02:54:00 -
[38]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
That is so ****ing stupid... Nobody forced you to be a part of that... Also, why on earth would anyone have to go through all that to attend a meaningless meeting is beyond me...
Ever heard about video conferencing ?! Maybe look into that and integrate it into your ****ing monocles !
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:00:00 -
[39]
Edited by: Tanya Fox on 05/07/2011 03:02:07
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Hopefully we can agree on those facts. Now here's what winning looks like (from my perspective:)
CCP commits permanently to making Incarna optional.
CCP commits permanently to keeping $ for GTC for PLEX the only MT in the game.
CCP removes Aurum from the game.
CCP agrees that since we have paid for 2 expansions per year with our inflated monthly subscription, and since this expansion is all about Spaceship Barbies, that they will allow us to play dressup with our Spaceship Barbies for 'free' (since we've already paid for it with our inflated monthly subscription.)
CCP acknowledges that Hilmar's idea to gouge players because he saw a slideshow on the Internets about gouging players in a F2P game doesn't work in the industry's most expensive subscription-based MMO.
CCP restores adequate funding to EVE development (Internet Spaceships.)
CCP regains the respect and trust of its playerbase, and goes on to great financial success from its 2 new games, which can operate on whatever financial model Hilmar dreams up because they are new games with no established precedents/understandings.
That's what winning would look like (more or less). It's a little rough, but give me a week to fly to Iceland and I'd polish it up a bit.
Or just get me drunk and tell me you have no plans to sell non-vanity items in your vanity items store. I'm good with that.
Incarna optional? Think they've already said the hanger view is not coming back, although they will try to introduce ship spinning, but it's probably not going to be as it was.
MT will come into the game and it'll stay, all people can hope for is that it does just deal with vanity items. There's no reason vanity items should not be purchased through the MT store.
Aurum remains because vanity items do.
Not sure I've seen anything that commits CCP to releasing 2 expansions per year. We can assume that the cost of the expansions are in the sub fees, but have they actually said this is the case.
Hilmar's idea seems to have been called just that, an idea. They distanced themselves from it, so it's unlikely they will pursue that course at least in the short-term.
Don't think you will see a massive improvement with funding to Eve, until at least one of the other projects is up and running and bringing in revenue.
Trust and respect won't be easy to restore, you really should use the CSMs more to communicate with CCP now that you've got CCPs attention.
Actually getting drunk does not sound such a bad idea.
|
Ianus
Caldari Geminus Gateway
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:03:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Milken Gekko
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about...
That is so ****ing stupid... Nobody forced you to be a part of that... Also, why on earth would anyone have to go through all that to attend a meaningless meeting is beyond me...
Ever heard about video conferencing ?! Maybe look into that and integrate it into your ****ing monocles !
|
|
Chris Fierce
Caldari NoD Imperium
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:03:00 -
[41]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
YOU put yourself up for election, so do the job YOU felt YOU could handle. If your health is a problem, maybe you shouldn't be part of the CSM? Just saying.
CCP didn't need to get the CSM to Iceland. A simple reply to any one of the threadnaughts would've ended most this, but no, CCP let the drama play out. Maybe just to see how far it would go?
What I'd like to know is who "leaked" these mails in the first place? Surely there were only a certain number of people who were CC'd in the mail? ---------------------------
I gashmoygadied her gaflavity with my googus. |
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:06:00 -
[42]
To expand a bit on CSM's particular failure.
Yes, Mittens is a drunken blowhard who failed miserably, but it's more than that.
CSM failed, imo, because they had the wrong objective.
CSM's objective, imo, was to reach an agreement with CCP.
CSM's objective should have been to extract meaningful concessions from CCP.
The playerbase can give you all the leverage in the world, but if you go to the car dealership determined to buy a car, Hilmar will sell you a car and laugh all the way to the bank. You've got to go to the car dealership prepared to walk away without a new car.
Imagine how awesome this would have turned out if CSM had just said no dice and released a statement saying: 'We would have accepted X, Y, Z but CCP refused to accept ANY of our terms, so we cannot announce today a resolution to this situation.'
Duh. Winning.
Want to buy a monocle? |
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:08:00 -
[43]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
Stand down & let somebody with a little more heart & better health have a go then, you poor unappreciated martyr.
We should feel guilty that you had a bad Holiday & forgive you for a s h i t outcome is that it?
Seriously, why even run for CSM if it's obviously such a painful inconvenience to you personally, nobody here want's you to Quote: put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests
. Who's interests exactly? Why are you on the CSM? Please GTFO, fraud. How about some CSM who a) aren't whiney *****es & b) consider the interests of all EvE players important!
Gesus, cry more
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:13:00 -
[44]
Originally by: San Severina AkJon, you speak 100% for me, only you say it better. ... Never forget EvE Players, this patch cost the Community a lot of great players & in a game like EvE the community is everything, this is unacceptable IMO, especially when it all could have been avoided if CCP didn't have their heads buried so far up their -you know what!-
Thanks for the compliment, but I think you say it pretty damn well yourself.
Want to buy a monocle? |
Dimitrios Ypsilanti
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:14:00 -
[45]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Did I miss any?
11. You didn't lose because you're still here.
If you wanted to be somewhere else, that's where you'd be.
Instead "winning" for you wasn't going to spend your time elsewhere, it was to stay here and troll the forums.
The only ones who lose are those who clicked on this thread.
|
AnzacPaul
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:15:00 -
[46]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
How dare you try and turn this on the player base. You should be disgusted in yourself.
YOU chose to go to the summit. YOU chose to drop everything to save YOUR game of internet spaceships.
Dont sit there and pretend like you were saving the world. The meeting would have gone no different had you been there or not. CCP knew long before they invited you how much they were willing to give and what they wouldnt give.
All we got were a bunch of bull **** statements telling us absoloutely nothing but a bunch of articulated spin that will no doubt see the introduction of a lot of features into the game soon that YOU and CCP decided were ok for the majority of us.
NO TO MICROTRANSACTIONS IN EVE. |
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:16:00 -
[47]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson This thread was supposed to be about WHY we lost, but given the (surprisingly?) high degree of controversy over WHETHER we lost, I suppose I should explain what winning would have looked like. Let's see if we can agree on a few facts:
For the last 8 years, EVE has been a sandbox game about Internet Spaceships and a player-driven economy with a steep learning curve and requiring a long time investment from its players/customers.
EVE has always run on low-end computers. Even by players running multiple accounts, a practice which has been encouraged in both game development and marketing by its developer, CCP games.
It has an incredible community that pays a high monthly subscription, with the average long-term player paying $50 per month or so (to support the multiple accounts I mentioned earlier.) In exchange for that high monthly subscription, EVE has traditionally offered 2 'free' expansions per year.
EVE has been and continues to be immensely profitable for its developer, CCP Games, which refers internally to EVE as its 'Golden Goose.'
Recent patches and expansions have left countless bugs, exploits, imbalances and unfinished features. EVE (Internet Spaceships) is in a state of utter neglect.
The last patch fried/overheated the video cards of a significant percentage of its customers and makes the game unplayable in multibox mode for a significantly higher percentage of its customers.
CCP Games devotes grossly inadequate financial/development resources to EVE (Internet Spaceships,) focusing instead solely on its 2 new games in development. What few resources it does devote to EVE (Internet Spaceships) are being allocated by someone who has expressed enthusiasm about breaking in-game functionality and selling it back to the players through microtransactions.
Hopefully we can agree on those facts. Now here's what winning looks like (from my perspective:)
CCP commits permanently to making Incarna optional.
CCP commits permanently to keeping $ for GTC for PLEX the only MT in the game.
CCP removes Aurum from the game.
CCP agrees that since we have paid for 2 expansions per year with our inflated monthly subscription, and since this expansion is all about Spaceship Barbies, that they will allow us to play dressup with our Spaceship Barbies for 'free' (since we've already paid for it with our inflated monthly subscription.)
CCP acknowledges that Hilmar's idea to gouge players because he saw a slideshow on the Internets about gouging players in a F2P game doesn't work in the industry's most expensive subscription-based MMO.
CCP restores adequate funding to EVE development (Internet Spaceships.)
CCP regains the respect and trust of its playerbase, and goes on to great financial success from its 2 new games, which can operate on whatever financial model Hilmar dreams up because they are new games with no established precedents/understandings.
That's what winning would look like (more or less). It's a little rough, but give me a week to fly to Iceland and I'd polish it up a bit.
Or just get me drunk and tell me you have no plans to sell non-vanity items in your vanity items store. I'm good with that.
honestly AkJon, I wish you were on the CSM, maybe make White Tree an offer, since S/He is obviously not interested in anything the players want & doing the Job is a risk to his/her health & a massive inconvenience to boot.
I'll be giving all my remaining ISK to you before the 14th, maybe you can put it towards a plex & keep fighting the good fight for me & many others like me.
I agree 100% with everything I've read of yours -100%.
CSM maybe 5% & this mess is partly their fault anyway for not being Men instead of trembling boys in front of the mighty CCP.
|
Milken Gekko
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:18:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Ianus
Originally by: Milken Gekko
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about...
That is so ****ing stupid... Nobody forced you to be a part of that... Also, why on earth would anyone have to go through all that to attend a meaningless meeting is beyond me...
Ever heard about video conferencing ?! Maybe look into that and integrate it into your ****ing monocles !
Thank you very much I♥anus for quoting my insightful post so I get more air time
|
Hungry Eyes
Ministry of War
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:25:00 -
[49]
no one gives a damn about the protest
the thousands of cancelled subs will speak for themselves. Hilmar said it himself, they only care about what we "do", i.e. how many of us quit, not about what we say, i.e. there IS NO collaboration between players and CCP.
|
Erichk Knaar
Caldari Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:30:00 -
[50]
If you had monocles, your opinions would have weight.
|
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:31:00 -
[51]
Originally by: San Severina honestly AkJon, I wish you were on the CSM, maybe make White Tree an offer, since S/He is obviously not interested in anything the players want & doing the Job is a risk to his/her health & a massive inconvenience to boot.
I'll be giving all my remaining ISK to you before the 14th, maybe you can put it towards a plex & keep fighting the good fight for me & many others like me.
I agree 100% with everything I've read of yours -100%.
CSM maybe 5% & this mess is partly their fault anyway for not being Men instead of trembling boys in front of the mighty CCP.
Please keep your ISK. I have 30B and 5 accounts paid through march already.
And please have some sympathy for White Tree. I don't share his view but I think his post came from the heart, and I appreciate that. (I prefer a genuine emotional outburst to disingenuous political doublespeak any day.)
Want to buy a monocle? |
Allota VaISK
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:32:00 -
[52]
I came to the conclusion, mid 'riots', that the protesters and the likes of AkJon and his circle jerk (alts?) are just a bunch of fecking drama queens.
Why you choose to invest so much time and effort in complaining or 'protesting' about something that is supposed to be fun is completely beyond me. How have you not taken a step back and gone... dam... what the hell am I doing with my life?
EVE will evolve however its investors and developers choose. Good or bad, c'est la vie.
|
Asuri Kinnes
Caldari Adhocracy Incorporated
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:33:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Haulie Berry Oh, for ****'s sake - you took an all-expenses paid trip to Iceland to meekly suggest to CCP that they should maybe consider making a vague and entirely non-committal statement to appease the angry mob. Please climb down off that cross.
Originally by: Darik Jita I stand with the CSM in principle, but your response, Ms. Tree, displays poor impulse control. Politicians don't ***** at their constituents (assuming they want to enjoy continued popular support).
Originally by: Milken Gekko That is so ****ing stupid... Nobody forced you to be a part of that... Also, why on earth would anyone have to go through all that to attend a meaningless meeting is beyond me...
Ever heard about video conferencing ?! Maybe look into that and integrate it into your ****ing monocles !
Originally by: Chris Fierce YOU put yourself up for election, so do the job YOU felt YOU could handle. If your health is a problem, maybe you shouldn't be part of the CSM? Just saying.
CCP didn't need to get the CSM to Iceland. A simple reply to any one of the threadnaughts would've ended most this, but no, CCP let the drama play out. Maybe just to see how far it would go?
What I'd like to know is who "leaked" these mails in the first place? Surely there were only a certain number of people who were CC'd in the mail?
The amount of stupid in these threads (besides OP's) is stunning...
It's obvious none of these mouthbreathers have ever done a lick of international traveling... Otherwise they wouldn't have posted..... Dolt's...
OP - your an over-entitled dolt. Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online.
No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs. |
RougeOperator
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:34:00 -
[54]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
Well there you have it, proof the CSM is a joke just with the content of this post he proved they were full of it.
|
Malak Alraheem
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 03:35:00 -
[55]
I guess I view this a little differently. From my point of view, this isn't over yet. Item #3 is the biggest one on the list, and that will take time. . I'm as mad as I can take it and I'm not going to hell anymore!
I have reassigned my money for CCP to other projects for the next 18 months... |
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:00:00 -
[56]
Originally by: Asuri Kinnes OP - your an over-entitled dolt.
I think my fellow players have really low self-esteem or battered wife's syndrome or something.
I'm not over-entitled at ALL. I'm a customer of the world's most expensive subscription-based MMO. The developer has left the game in tatters and is now trying to squeeze out a few more shekels by charging even MORE money to fix some in-game functionality it plans to break.
Let's see if this analogy helps:
If I go to a pricey restaurant and order (and pay for) steak, I don't expect to be served hamburger helper and then to be charged extra for the ketchup.
Want to buy a monocle? |
Lilith Velkor
Minmatar Heretic Army B A N E
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:03:00 -
[57]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
If I go to a pricey restaurant and order (and pay for) steak, I don't expect to be served hamburger helper and then to be charged extra for the ketchup.
The thing is, you did pay for the all-you-can-eat buffet. If there isnt any steak on the buffet, tough luck.
|
Milken Gekko
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:09:00 -
[58]
Edited by: Milken Gekko on 05/07/2011 04:09:59
Originally by: Lilith Velkor
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
If I go to a pricey restaurant and order (and pay for) steak, I don't expect to be served hamburger helper and then to be charged extra for the ketchup.
The thing is, you did pay for the all-you-can-eat buffet. If there isnt any steak on the buffet, tough luck.
Except you're more than likely to catch typhus from all the meals but you only realize it after reading some of the things people who have eaten there before have written on the walls... also, how are the owners of that metaphorical fancy restaurant suposed to keep their mansions and pay the cleaning ladies if they don't cut back on the beef and charge you extra for condiments ? HOW ?!
|
Jawmare
Minmatar The Python Cartel. The Defenders of Pen Island
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:20:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Darik Jita
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
I stand with the CSM in principle, but your response, Ms. Tree, displays poor impulse control. Politicians don't ***** at their constituents (assuming they want to enjoy continued popular support).
White Tree was elected by goons, not the player base, ofc he doesnt need to care about the general player base, 90% of the CSM6 only work in the interest of their 0.0 power-bloc.
|
Erichk Knaar
Caldari Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:31:00 -
[60]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Let's see if this analogy helps:
If I go to a pricey restaurant and order (and pay for) steak, I don't expect to be served hamburger helper and then to be charged extra for the ketchup.
You get the right to steak. The ketchup is up to them. You only paid for steak.
|
|
Sergeant Spot
Galactic Geographic BookMark Surveying Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:41:00 -
[61]
Originally by: baltec1 It stopped because the bulk of us didnt want none vanity items. CCP has now said the will not go down that road so we are happy again.
Its as simple as that.
^^This^^
OP fails at identifying failure.
Play nice while you butcher each other.
|
Khamelean
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:43:00 -
[62]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson This thread was supposed to be about WHY we lost, but given the (surprisingly?) high degree of controversy over WHETHER we lost, I suppose I should explain what winning would have looked like. Let's see if we can agree on a few facts:
For the last 8 years, EVE has been a sandbox game about Internet Spaceships and a player-driven economy with a steep learning curve and requiring a long time investment from its players/customers.
EVE has always run on low-end computers. Even by players running multiple accounts, a practice which has been encouraged in both game development and marketing by its developer, CCP games.
It has an incredible community that pays a high monthly subscription, with the average long-term player paying $50 per month or so (to support the multiple accounts I mentioned earlier.) In exchange for that high monthly subscription, EVE has traditionally offered 2 'free' expansions per year.
EVE has been and continues to be immensely profitable for its developer, CCP Games, which refers internally to EVE as its 'Golden Goose.'
Recent patches and expansions have left countless bugs, exploits, imbalances and unfinished features. EVE (Internet Spaceships) is in a state of utter neglect.
The last patch fried/overheated the video cards of a significant percentage of its customers and makes the game unplayable in multibox mode for a significantly higher percentage of its customers.
CCP Games devotes grossly inadequate financial/development resources to EVE (Internet Spaceships,) focusing instead solely on its 2 new games in development. What few resources it does devote to EVE (Internet Spaceships) are being allocated by someone who has expressed enthusiasm about breaking in-game functionality and selling it back to the players through microtransactions.
Hopefully we can agree on those facts.
I think you need to go find a dictionary and look up the difference between "fact","opinion" and "delusion".
|
AnzacPaul
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:47:00 -
[63]
Edited by: AnzacPaul on 05/07/2011 04:46:53
Originally by: baltec1 It stopped because the bulk of us didnt want none vanity items. CCP has now said the will not go down that road so we are happy again.
Its as simple as that.
Please link the post that states what you said above in clear, concise terms.
NO TO MICROTRANSACTIONS IN EVE. |
Khamelean
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:52:00 -
[64]
The protests were successful, as is evidenced by this post lasting on the front page of GD for longer than 30 seconds.
The only reason there are a few people still complaining is because they had unreasonable expectations.
|
Milken Gekko
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:56:00 -
[65]
Originally by: Khamelean I think you need to go find a dictionary and look up the difference between "fanboy","black flag operations" and "oligarchy".
Fix'd that for you
|
Mister Smithington
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:57:00 -
[66]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Hopefully we can agree on those facts. Now here's what winning looks like (from my perspective:)
CCP commits permanently to making Incarna optional.
CCP commits permanently to keeping $ for GTC for PLEX the only MT in the game.
CCP removes Aurum from the game.
CCP agrees that since we have paid for 2 expansions per year with our inflated monthly subscription, and since this expansion is all about Spaceship Barbies, that they will allow us to play dressup with our Spaceship Barbies for 'free' (since we've already paid for it with our inflated monthly subscription.)
CCP acknowledges that Hilmar's idea to gouge players because he saw a slideshow on the Internets about gouging players in a F2P game doesn't work in the industry's most expensive subscription-based MMO.
CCP restores adequate funding to EVE development (Internet Spaceships.)
CCP regains the respect and trust of its playerbase, and goes on to great financial success from its 2 new games, which can operate on whatever financial model Hilmar dreams up because they are new games with no established precedents/understandings.
That's what winning would look like (more or less). It's a little rough, but give me a week to fly to Iceland and I'd polish it up a bit.
Or just get me drunk and tell me you have no plans to sell non-vanity items in your vanity items store. I'm good with that.
You're projecting your particular desires onto the community. Guess what? Not everyone shares your priorities. The fact that you made this post assuming that everyone would agree the protest failed demonstrates that quite clearly.
Let me ask you this? If the wishes of the majority of the community had not been achieved, do you really think the rage would have died down? We were ****ed about the prospect of game effecting MTs in our sandbox. CCP backed down from those, and so we let off the rage.
AkJon, I'm sorry you jumped on the populist rage-train waving the flag for the most hardcore position of secondary and tertiary issues. I'm sorry you didn't understand the revolt was about MTs, and not reshaping Eve into your personal ideal.
You're right, no one should be forced into incarna, the way that no one should be forced into wormholes or forced into mining. But what you fail to understand is that some people are very much looking forward to the full version of Incarna. Some of them would love to take all the devs off Flying in Space to churn out Incarna content as quickly as possible. The summit was still a victory for them, because it achieved its primary goal: getting CCP to back away from MT for game effecting items.
TL;DR, you're delusional, stop talking.
|
ALLYOURMONEY BELONGTOUS
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:58:00 -
[67]
The post from CCP was nicely done. Well played but I think CCP will still lose customers. People will watch what CCP does and not what they say. I will miss this game. When my sub runs out I will not continue until CQ is optional. Lots of people feel this way and CCP is going to put it on the back burner like everything else. Going to be a pity to lose so many people for something they could have avoided easily.
|
Maman Brigitte
Licentia Ex Vereor Intergalactic Exports Group
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 04:58:00 -
[68]
Ship spinning means return of optional CQ.
Promise of no non-vanity items in NeX has been secured.
...
Yeah, Incarna could be better, and some day it will be better, but I'm failing to see how the protesters, including myself, didn't get what we were after?
Conflicts are resolved through compromise. The most important issues have been addressed, by far in our favor.
Now is the time for all good men to stop whining and go back to playing in the sandbox.
|
gargars
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 05:00:00 -
[69]
And who ever said it failed? Quite the opposite. The protests caught media attention and it's the only thing CCP seems to care about.
Due to the protests the CSM was flown in for the emergency meetings last week, the promises from CCP and the press conferences tomorrow.
Calling that nothing is pretty petty and sad of you despite your agenda.
|
Maman Brigitte
Licentia Ex Vereor Intergalactic Exports Group
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 05:00:00 -
[70]
Originally by: ALLYOURMONEY BELONGTOUS The post from CCP was nicely done. Well played but I think CCP will still lose customers. People will watch what CCP does and not what they say. I will miss this game. When my sub runs out I will not continue until CQ is optional. Lots of people feel this way and CCP is going to put it on the back burner like everything else. Going to be a pity to lose so many people for something they could have avoided easily.
The option to turn it off exists, and will remain until they have returned ship-spinning to the game.
There's no way they can do that without making CQ optional, I'm guessing you'll dock up normally with a "disembark" button somewhere you can push to enter Incarna.
So, CQ is optional. You back yet?
|
|
Milken Gekko
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 05:03:00 -
[71]
LOADING
|
Kumq uat
Gallente Guiding Hand Social Club Dystopia Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 05:12:00 -
[72]
I am putting a 100 million bounty on the corpse of the op. I must be provided with a corpse and an API verified kill mail.
Also first person to buy me a monocle gets my eternal love. --------------------------------------- www.eve-pirate.com original author |
Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 05:14:00 -
[73]
Edited by: Adunh Slavy on 05/07/2011 05:14:48 For my part, we won. My concern, and that of the majority of the protestors by all accounts, was non-vanity advantages gained by micro-transactions. CCP gave us a statement that for me, and many others, was reassuring. The CSM, who took time out of their personal lives and deserves our thanks, confirmed the statement by CCP.
We were psised, we stopped the engine and got a more firm commitment as to the direction of the Nex and non-vanity. Win.
Sure there are some things about Incarna that people do not like. Even if the Nex was not included, those other things would still not be liked.
1 - You must have been asleep 2 - The protestors had no leader, nor did they require one. Besides, not everyone posts with their main. 3 - All leaves in Fall do not land upon the ground at the same time. 4 - Eh? 5 - Eve players are some how immune to being human? 6 - We made progress in spite of them. 7 - Not relevant 8 - White Tree has good reason to be upset with comments like that. 9 - You saw how big the protests were, and that was from even fewer words about the future of MT. CCP will have a tough time going against this statement. 10 - Dev alts thing was conspiratorial, still is. The conspiracy lived and thrived in the environment as predicted. Mobs are unkind, unruly and treat dissenters harshly for a reason, right or wrong.
Sandbox Protection League
|
Ranka Mei
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 05:17:00 -
[74]
Protests did not fail -- OP, however, did.
People soon gave up when they saw 'the big yellow question' had been answered to their satisfaction: no non-vanity game-breaking items for AUR.
I know it's often hard to stand down when you're so riled and completely pumped up, ready for yet another week of fierce protesting. And then word comes down: 'War is over; we won.' And it comes quicker than you expected. And then, still in denial, you start looking for excuses to keep going: "But, but, they didn't say 'NEVER!'; they only said 'No plans' to us." And more of such lame nitpickings -- you've seen 'em all.
Truth is, the war really IS over. This time CCP gave their word, not only to this community, but to the watching game world at large. There's no way they're gonna get out of this one without a lot more damage than the poor Memorial suffered.
So, relax; go home, and go play EVE again.
-- "All your monies AUR belong to us." -- CCP |
Flag Bravo
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 05:18:00 -
[75]
As long as CCP has not lied to us again, then everything turned out quite nice and the protests worked a treat.
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 05:45:00 -
[76]
Originally by: Mister Smithington You're projecting your particular desires onto the community. Guess what? Not everyone shares your priorities. The fact that you made this post assuming that everyone would agree the protest failed demonstrates that quite clearly.
Let me ask you this? If the wishes of the majority of the community had not been achieved, do you really think the rage would have died down? We were ****ed about the prospect of game effecting MTs in our sandbox. CCP backed down from those, and so we let off the rage.
AkJon, I'm sorry you jumped on the populist rage-train waving the flag for the most hardcore position of secondary and tertiary issues. I'm sorry you didn't understand the revolt was about MTs, and not reshaping Eve into your personal ideal.
You're right, no one should be forced into incarna, the way that no one should be forced into wormholes or forced into mining. But what you fail to understand is that some people are very much looking forward to the full version of Incarna. Some of them would love to take all the devs off Flying in Space to churn out Incarna content as quickly as possible. The summit was still a victory for them, because it achieved its primary goal: getting CCP to back away from MT for game effecting items.
TL;DR, you're delusional, stop talking.
Which of my particular desires do you think I'm projecting?
That Incarna be optional?
That CCP ought to allocate sufficient resources to Internet Spaceships?
That MT be restricted to PLEX (or to vanity only as a final compromise)?
That in-game functionality ought not to be broken by CCP and sold back to its customers via microtransactions?
That CCP ought to be satisfied with its 'highest cost per player in the industry' subscription model and not treat its customers like the 'golden goose' it thinks of us as?
I am confident that all of my 'desires' would meet with majority (if not vast majority) approval from the rest of CCP's customers. I don't consider any of them to be 'hardcore'. I think you are (to put it kindly) misinformed. But please illuminate me if you disagree and please provide specifics and not ad hominems. Thanks.
Want to buy a monocle? |
Mister Smithington
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 05:51:00 -
[77]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Which of my particular desires do you think I'm projecting?
That Incarna be optional?
That CCP ought to allocate sufficient resources to Internet Spaceships?
That MT be restricted to PLEX (or to vanity only as a final compromise)?
That in-game functionality ought not to be broken by CCP and sold back to its customers via microtransactions?
That CCP ought to be satisfied with its 'highest cost per player in the industry' subscription model and not treat its customers like the 'golden goose' it thinks of us as?
I am confident that all of my 'desires' would meet with majority (if not vast majority) approval from the rest of CCP's customers. I don't consider any of them to be 'hardcore'. I think you are (to put it kindly) misinformed. But please illuminate me if you disagree and please provide specifics and not ad hominems. Thanks.
Thank you for proving my point.
Originally by: Mister Smithington We were ****ed about the prospect of game effecting MTs in our sandbox. CCP backed down from those, and so we let off the rage. . . I'm sorry you didn't understand the revolt was about MTs, and not reshaping Eve into your personal ideal.
Here's another way to look at it. We were protesting MTs for game effecting items. Our protests were successful. I'm sorry if yours weren't. Maybe you should be better at protesting.
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 05:58:00 -
[78]
Teadaze said it well when he left:
"Firstly I would like to point out that just because IÆve decided Eve is no longer the game for me it doesnÆt automatically mean your choice to continue to play it is wrong. Nor am I going to try to make a case why you should quit, I believe in the ôplay what you enjoyö mantra and it would be a very dull world if everyone had the same opinion about everything.
So, why did I cancel two of my six accounts last year and the final four yesterday?
Simply put, CCP promised that Incarna would be optional and it is now clear that it is not going to be. The CaptainÆs Quarters (CQ) being the first part and having seen the plans for the other bits due this year the rest wonÆt be optional in any real sense (I hope they change their mind but in any case the discussion was buried under the NDA banner so I canÆt go into detail). For me this is a deal breaker.
I can handle the existence of Incarna to cater for the people who are looking forward to it. I can even handle the reduced development of the flying in space part of the game (after all, due to CSM pressure we have a team working on quick fixes). But forcing me to use the avatar environment û sorry no, this is not the game I enjoyed. To some people this isnÆt enough of a reason and they claim IÆm being an idiot û well I point you to the first paragraph.
It would have been an easy thing and a big win for CCP to retain the docking into hanger as an option for those of us who have zero interest in the avatar engine stuff, but CCP have decided not to. I can only assume they donÆt want metrics showing any significant number of people not using the avatar stuff and also I sense the hand of marketing. It should not be the job of the CSM or the players to make a case for why a disruptive change shouldnÆt be put in game, it is the job of CCP to make a case for why they want to put it in! In this case the best answer I got was ôBecause it will be awesomeö which I donÆt find an acceptable reason (Awesome has lost its meaning now, it is no better than using nice ;) )
Am I bitter? Not especially. IÆm more disappointed with the current trend at CCP for enforced participation in new features. The loss of the existing character portraits broke any significant investment in my eve chars and the broken promise of Incarna being optional made the decision to leave fairly simple.
Some will claim that I should wait and see, but the CQ blog confirmed what I already knew from the summit. IÆve already waited to find out if they would take the optional comments on board. For the Incarna fans there is more to come but unless CCP pull a 180 on some plans I will like it even less than the enforced docking into CQ. Rather than continue to raise red flags and call bull**** on various things (as CCPÆs CEO wanted us to) I will focus my energy into other projects.
The thing IÆve found the most amusing is the amount of vitriol directed towards me by players (some with known CCP connections) for daring to suggest the CQ be optional. I didnÆt want to take the shinies away from you, so what difference does it make to your gameplay if I would rather see only my ship in the hanger than a room? Again, justify a disruptive change instead of asking me to make the case for retaining existing systems. It could have been an optional change and everybody would have been happy.
Then come the comparisons between opting out of an interface and opting out of PvP. No that analogy is flawed because there is a simple difference between player driven behaviour and a chat UI.
As I said at the top, if you still enjoy Eve then I donÆt think you foolish for playing it. This is not an either or, them and us, for or against type of situation. I respect your choice, why is it so hard for people to respect mine?
No you canÆt have my stuff and IÆm not going to biomass my character. Never say never. Maybe in a couple of years IÆll come back."
Want to buy a monocle? |
John Caesse
Caldari Navy of Xoc The Remnant Legion
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 06:06:00 -
[79]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
10. CCP stall tactics and counterintelligence/war propaganda (via dev alts)
Don't remove your tinfoil hat or the CCP devs will come to your neighborhood and transmit signals into your head to make you buy quafe t-shirts.
Seriously, they do this. CCP Shadow is a ninja.
|
K'iran
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 06:11:00 -
[80]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Teadaze said it well when he left:
Always liked the guy, no nonsense just facts, hard work and devotion. Voted for him as well.
|
|
Mister Smithington
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 06:11:00 -
[81]
Wow, you've convinced me. In fact the rage was NOT about MT for game effecting items. In fact we took the opportunity of the release of Fearless and Hilmar's Killmail to rage about vanity MTs, which we had known about for some time, and docking straight to CQ, which we had also known about for some time.
Originally by: Mister Smithington TL;DR You're delusional
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 06:13:00 -
[82]
I also find Goon opinions from something awful rather interesting:
Evil Weasel: "Mittani got snookered at the CSM meeting, guess he can't handle his liquor that well."
Evil Weasel: "Vile rat is correct. Mittani got the same carefully worded statement allowing future non-vanity transactions they offered before he left. He also doesn't seem to have spoken to the people who rammed through the microtransactions stuff (not the devs) so he's feeling all warm and fuzzy because he spoke to people who aren't important."
Mittens' Reply: "You know none of the poo poo I know. Vile Rat didn't even attend the summit. He's as informed as you are.
And you have no clue who I spoke to about what.
Edit: Suppose I shouldn't be ~allmad~ but it's pretty gay when you don't even talk to me before going around trying to undermine things while completely, utterly ignorant. "
So apparently the part of the CCP statement about MT had already been written before CSM even left for Reyk. All CCP had to do was to get CSM to sign off. How many drinks did that take?
Want to buy a monocle? |
Mister Smithington
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 06:19:00 -
[83]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
So apparently the part of the CCP statement about MT had already been written before CSM even left for Reyk. All CCP had to do was to get CSM to sign off. How many drinks did that take?
Well, considering Zulu said the same thing that appeared in the summit statement in his "100% more love" blog, and their COO said it in an interview with an Icelandic newspaper, it really isn't surprising that CCP was ready to concede that point before the CSM arrived.
However, Fearless suggests that in May, before the riots, CCP had other plans, or at least were exploring other options. The rage put a stop to that. Therefore the protests were successful.
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 06:25:00 -
[84]
Unfortunately, however, it seems the only CSM delegate with any sense didn't go.
Vile Rat:"Vile rat posted:
Wish I could be happy with this result but I cannot.
quote: [from the CSM part of the joint statement - AkJon]
"Game-affecting Virtual Goods: We are convinced that CCP has no plans to introduce any game-affecting virtual goods, only pure vanity items such as clothing and ship skins. We have been repeatedly assured that there are no plans for ægold ammo', ships which have different statistics from existing common hulls, or any other feared ægame destroying' virtual goods or services. We have expressed our deep concern about potential grey areas that the introduction of virtual goods permits, and CCP has made a commitment to discuss any proposals that might fall into these grey areas in detail with CSM at the earliest possible stage."
While this statement is true I fear I must disagree with the overall sense of comfort in the message because I very strongly do NOT agree.
The lack of a clear concise statement declaring that they will never go in this direction is alarming, let me explain why.
Right now there is a roll out of cosmetic microtransactions which by and large the CSM, myself included, had no real issues with. I personally had no issues with it because there was an understanding that this was the far extent of what would be done. Nowhere in these statements is a determination to never cross this line into pay for non cosmetic, just an immediate desire to not pursue this goal. I can not support any MT scheme that would pave the way for even the possibility of going beyond this. I would have been satisfied if they said "we will never do this", you will notice that this statement did not occur.
I respect the fact that CCP has no plans to go beyond cosmetic and I truly feel this sentiment is sincere, but without committing to it my confidence in the future of this MT scheme is in doubt and as such I cannot support it."
Want to buy a monocle? |
Deviana Sevidon
Gallente Panta-Rhei Butterfly Effect Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 06:29:00 -
[85]
Well the Gold Ammo was never going to come anyway, it was just the opinion of an employee. Pay2win already exist, PLEX is nothing else, but the whiners here are in active denial of the fact.
Also some people repeat the most stupid of assumptions over and over until others started to believe them (religions work the same way. you can get away with most ridiculous stuff if repeat it in front of a crowd long enough).
Some of the most bitter vets will also take the existance of Incarna as a reason to leave, but as this feature does influence the gameplay part of EVE in any shape or form, we are probably better of without these attention *****s.
Quote: Disclaimer: All mentioned above contains my opinion and is therefore an absolute truth (for me anyway, my universe, muhahaha.....ok, done
|
Ranger 1
Amarr Paragon Fury Cascade Imminent
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 06:30:00 -
[86]
Edited by: Ranger 1 on 05/07/2011 06:31:20 There has never been a statement made that some self entitled idiot couldn't rip imaginary holes in.
People like you are EXACTLY why these people ended up having to protest in the first place. The flow of pure crap that flows from these forums, from people like you, has changed these forums from a useful feedback system into a complete farce. Small wonder CCP doesn't pay as much attention to it as they used to.
Get lost.
===== The world will not end in 2012, however there will be a serious nerf to Planetary Interaction. |
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 06:32:00 -
[87]
Edited by: AkJon Ferguson on 05/07/2011 06:34:37 While we're visiting other forums, Hratli Smirks said it very well:
"I'm still not resubbing hth.
The ultimate problem here is no matter what CCP does or says I don't trust them to communicate their intentions and I don't trust them to fix their game. I came to this conclusion when people were wondering if Mittens was going to tell us to pull up stakes and move to WoT or something when he came back from Iceland and I realized that what was going to happen was the CSM was going to come back and say "its all cool guys its just CCP is bad at talking to human beings they don't intend to add game-affecting MT and they are serious not like when they said they weren't going to add MT last year. CCP has a lot of very smart people running it now despite years of evidence to the contrary don't worry they understand."
This game has been ****ed up to various degrees since Dominion, which was roughly 18 months ago. If they haven't been able to solve the problems that players pointed out before they even introduced them into the live game in 18 months, or even look like they understand the problems, then I'm not sure why I should continue to pay them (or rather facilitate someone else paying them on my behalf) on good faith that Some Day they will bring it all together in the fabled fix expansion.
I mean these are the guys who watched a video of 25 titans DDing a carrier and said 'well that is just obviously unacceptably hilariously broken guys dont worry we see it' and their response was to make it so every titan could DD a carrier.
Ultimately me staying in this game just encourages them to keep being useless."
Actually, #11 (on the list this thread was supposed to be about) just occurred to me. A big part of the problem is that protesters weren't all posting in the same place. If there's a next time, hopefully we can decide on a common communication channel.
Edit: Apparently CCP doesn't allow links to that forum from here, you'll have to quote me to get the link.
Want to buy a monocle? |
Ranger 1
Amarr Paragon Fury Cascade Imminent
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 06:35:00 -
[88]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson While we're visiting other forums, Hratli Smirks said it very well:
"I'm still not resubbing hth.
The ultimate problem here is no matter what CCP does or says I don't trust them to communicate their intentions and I don't trust them to fix their game. I came to this conclusion when people were wondering if Mittens was going to tell us to pull up stakes and move to WoT or something when he came back from Iceland and I realized that what was going to happen was the CSM was going to come back and say "its all cool guys its just CCP is bad at talking to human beings they don't intend to add game-affecting MT and they are serious not like when they said they weren't going to add MT last year. CCP has a lot of very smart people running it now despite years of evidence to the contrary don't worry they understand."
This game has been ****ed up to various degrees since Dominion, which was roughly 18 months ago. If they haven't been able to solve the problems that players pointed out before they even introduced them into the live game in 18 months, or even look like they understand the problems, then I'm not sure why I should continue to pay them (or rather facilitate someone else paying them on my behalf) on good faith that Some Day they will bring it all together in the fabled fix expansion.
I mean these are the guys who watched a video of 25 titans DDing a carrier and said 'well that is just obviously unacceptably hilariously broken guys dont worry we see it' and their response was to make it so every titan could DD a carrier.
Ultimately me staying in this game just encourages them to keep being useless."
Actually, #11 (on the list this thread was supposed to be about) just occurred to me. A big part of the problem is that protesters weren't all posting in the same place. If there's a next time, hopefully we can decide on a common communication channel.
Yes, and hopefully it's somewhere else.
===== The world will not end in 2012, however there will be a serious nerf to Planetary Interaction. |
Mister Smithington
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 06:46:00 -
[89]
Originally by: Ranger 1
Yes, and hopefully it's somewhere else.
God damn dude, can you still not see that the riots that you hate so much made Eve a better place for you along with the rest of us? Can you not see that Eve dodged a potential NGE moment?
I sincerely hope CCP never screws up so bad that we need to do this again. But if they do, I sincerely hope the community can rally together again like we did last week. If it blows up your forums and crashes your market hubs for a few days, it's a worthwhile price to pay.
|
Reloadin
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 07:18:00 -
[90]
ITT : Exactly the kind of stupidity and stubbornness that Hilmar predicted. |
|
Bo Tosh
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 07:28:00 -
[91]
1. MT for vanity items only.
Works for me.
2. CQ optional until some form of the hanger returns.
I can live with that.
3. A promise of better communication from CCP.
Nice just hope it lasts.
4. Proof that even among the HiSec community the EvE playerbase aren't all sheep to be lead to the slaughter and that the CSM is worth a damn.
A victory in and of itself.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 07:39:00 -
[92]
Originally by: Milken Gekko
Originally by: Ianus
Originally by: Milken Gekko
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about...
That is so ****ing stupid... Nobody forced you to be a part of that... Also, why on earth would anyone have to go through all that to attend a meaningless meeting is beyond me...
Ever heard about video conferencing ?! Maybe look into that and integrate it into your ****ing monocles !
Thank you very much I♥anus for quoting my insightful post so I get more air time
It was a very good post & Ianus is on our side, don't worry. This is the best tread i've read in weeks BTW. Excellent work everyone!
|
JitaBUGz TheGreat
Caldari Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 07:51:00 -
[93]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
LAWL, so u get a paid trip out to Iceland to talk about why ppl are crying about a video game? Give the players you are supposed to represent a video of some Jersey Shore Kid telling us everything is going to be alright, and how tough it has been to talk like men about a game?
Then come on the forums and rip on a OP for giving his opinion like you just hung on a cross for us.
What a joke. Think it is time to shake up the CSM, and put some mature adults.....oh nvm. CCP is smart enough only to use you all as pawns anyhow. What a great way to converse with the player base u are supposed to represent.
|
Skytorn
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 07:54:00 -
[94]
Edited by: Skytorn on 05/07/2011 07:54:57
Originally by: Bo Tosh 1. MT for vanity items only.
Works for me.
2. CQ optional until some form of the hanger returns.
I can live with that.
3. A promise of better communication from CCP.
Nice just hope it lasts.
4. Proof that even among the HiSec community the EvE playerbase aren't all sheep to be lead to the slaughter and that the CSM isn't worth a damn.
A victory in and of itself.
U had a spelling error, fixed for u.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 07:55:00 -
[95]
Originally by: Maman Brigitte
Originally by: ALLYOURMONEY BELONGTOUS The post from CCP was nicely done. Well played but I think CCP will still lose customers. People will watch what CCP does and not what they say. I will miss this game. When my sub runs out I will not continue until CQ is optional. Lots of people feel this way and CCP is going to put it on the back burner like everything else. Going to be a pity to lose so many people for something they could have avoided easily.
The option to turn it off exists, and will remain until they have returned ship-spinning to the game.
There's no way they can do that without making CQ optional, I'm guessing you'll dock up normally with a "disembark" button somewhere you can push to enter Incarna.
So, CQ is optional. You back yet?
They are not returning the old hangar to the game, ship spinning could mean anything, the ship spins in CQ now & it sux a dirty a$$.
Are you seriously the worlds most gullible person? Lets say with CQ turned off you get the Information Tab of the active ship instead of the DOORÖ, that's the new feature, viola, ship spinning.
Is that an improvement in your opinion & also it's temporary until they feel we are ready to be forced to use CQ again.
How is this a victory> How?
I'm sorry but i can only assume you are a gullible idiot, there's just no nice way to put it. Soz
|
Najian
Noctiscion
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 07:56:00 -
[96]
Originally by: Reloadin ITT : Exactly the kind of stupidity and stubbornness that Hilmar predicted.
Hilmar's alt is Hilmar.
|
Kalle Demos
Amarr Helix Protocol
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 07:57:00 -
[97]
The main reason the protest failed was because simple comments demoralised the whole room, I must have got blocked by about 500 people just from saying "you know quitting the game usually involves quitting and not logging in".
Simple harmless comments generated insane amount of tears, then when people got suicide ganked they were crying more
All in all the protests were a joke .
LETS POST ON CAOD GANG! |
Chopper Rollins
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 08:09:00 -
[98]
San Severina, your posts in this are way too srs bsnss and a drag to read. Switch to decaf before the three paragraph post dismissing me as irrelevant/idiotic/whatever.
Change is coming, the protests were cute.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 08:18:00 -
[99]
Edited by: San Severina on 05/07/2011 08:28:54
Originally by: Bo Tosh 1. MT for vanity items only.
Works for me.
2. CQ optional until some form of the hanger returns.
I can live with that.
3. A promise of better communication from CCP.
Nice just hope it lasts.
4. Proof that even among the HiSec community the EvE playerbase aren't all sheep to be lead to the slaughter and that the CSM is worth a damn.
A victory in and of itself.
Again read the statement, that's not what is happening. Some form of Ship spinning will return until CCP decides to force you to use CQ again, no return to hangar, no hangar of any kind & definitely no promise of CQ being optional in the future. The absolute opposite actually.
Did you even read the damn thing?
I mean FFS.
PS; AkJon, thanks again for taking the time & thanks for schooling me on a few things here. Everybody in the game could do with reading your post at the bottom of page 3 ITT.
edit; went back & found the link Teadaze.net
Everybody & CCP & CSM!
Cheers man & please keep going for a bit longer, some of us still appreciate the effort.
|
Zaran Tarik
Amarr Ministry of War
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 08:19:00 -
[100]
Originally by: White Tree
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
You should be blaming CCP for such a mess they created to your life. How awful having to fly all the way to Iceland just so CCP could make a statement that I could have wrote for them in 10 mins WITHOUT having the CSM fly all the way to Iceland.
You were used to get the player base on CCP side so please dont complain about how hard its been the last 5 days.
|
|
Def Antares
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 08:21:00 -
[101]
Edited by: Def Antares on 05/07/2011 08:24:37
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
bla
They said they won't intruduce P2W items, sounds goot to me. Its also necessary to keep eve at what it is now, a complex ecological and strategical simulation.
Fact is you already have a P2W situation with PLEX. I'm comfortable with that, since it won't ruin the economy and trader / builder playstyles. The day you can buy P2W items in the NEX store circumventing the player-industry it will be the beginning of the end es eve is now, but that doesnt mean it will be necessarily bad either. Probably it will become an action shooter for consoles, which might be fine for some too.
Hopefully for me though some other developer picked up the original eve idea by then ....
EDIT: And I don't care about vanity items. If some people think they can value up their ego when demonstrating liquidity CCP made a smart move to offer what these people need. Epeens.
See Pimp: http://hiphopwired.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/pimp-c.jpg
|
Cashcow Golden Goose
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 08:28:00 -
[102]
Originally by: baltec1 It stopped because the bulk of us didnt want none vanity items. CCP has now said the will not go down that road so we are happy again.
Its as simple as that.
That is what they always said. See how easily had you were?
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 08:28:00 -
[103]
Even Mittens says something worthwhile on occasion:
Mittens: "Yeah, we got total breakdowns of unsubs and with drill-down data on who and why. That's why I'm saying that this is such a valuable protest tactic for future controversies.
Unsubbing works. I'd say it's safe to resub unless you want an excuse to leave the game - there's no gold ammo or anything. But the players now have a big ****ing stick to beat CCP with, and it's been proven to work."
Want to buy a monocle? |
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 08:30:00 -
[104]
I'm not through beating CCP with my big ****ing stick, are you?
Want to buy a monocle? |
Dorvab Arnst
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 08:35:00 -
[105]
Edited by: Dorvab Arnst on 05/07/2011 08:37:00 Edited by: Dorvab Arnst on 05/07/2011 08:35:48 Despite what you might think, your protest didnt fail. CCP listened and did alot more to placate all of you children than any other MMO company would have done. Ill liste some of my own reasons I think this protest was stupid, I think that it would be more appropriate:
1. The protest was based on rumour, heresay and speculation of what CCP might do at some point in the future with no confirmation that they would.
2. The protest was lead by a bunch of die-hard veteran trolls that no one in their right mind would take seriously.
3. The leaked "Greed is Good" memo was altered before release to make it look worse than it actually was. The first page of that memo that was removed before release to the 'community' was a disclaimer stating that said memo did not reflect the policies or the mind set of employees at CCP.
4. You failed to win over the population even with your petty little riots in Jita and Amarr. All you did was alienate yourselves by making the game unplayable for some people in the game. This is not the way to win the support of the people you 'claim to represent'.
5. Threats towards CCP by...certain memebers...of the protestors. Whether you see that particular incident as a threat or not, it should not have been said in any way shape or form. DIAF can be constrewed as a threat at worst and at the very least openly violent, aggressive and hostile. CCP were well within their rights to ban Helicity.
6. There were less than 2% of the population protesting. Thats right, less than 2% of you. I dont know how you can claim that you represent the EVE Community with such a small amount of support. Before you protested, you should have gathered more support.
7. Attitude is important. You all behaved like a terrorist group rather than protestors. The chat in local in both Jita and Amarr did nothing but make you all look like a bunch of extremist terrorists, thus getting more of you banned for sheer stupidity.
8. You had no centeral spokesperson. It was just a bunch of goons, yobs, punks and thugs trying to crash a system to make a point. The only point you made was that CCP is having to deal with idiotic little cretins who dont know how to protest without causing damage.
9. You protested in Jita. One of the systems in eve with a population cap. I mean really...are you that dumb? They capped the population in that system to a level that the node could handle.
10. There was no point in protesting in the first place. You should have waited to see what CCP did and then you would likely have had more support. As it stands, you protested on rumours and thus had little support.
|
Hannibal Ord
Minmatar Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 08:42:00 -
[106]
I keep reading these threads and I'm wondering if the OP actually saw the same events I did.
Every single issue I was annoyed about CCP has said they would resolve. So from my perspective the protest was a success.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 08:43:00 -
[107]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson I'm not through beating CCP with my big ****ing stick, are you?
I'm finding it hard to keep motivated now that I've quit but... I have 9 days left & I've committed to read EvE-O everyday & at least try to counter the obvious ALT/Fanboi rhetoric, if only because idiots & stooges sicken me.
It's extremely disheartening to see players constantly misunderstanding the statement on the future of the game. I honestly don't understand why people think the old hangar is coming back & CQ is going to be optional when the statement makes it clear nothing of the sort will happen.
I can only assume they haven't done their research & have been misinformed here by the disturbing amount of dishonest posts from dubious alt characters calling anyone not satisfied malcontents & whiners.
|
Dorvab Arnst
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:01:00 -
[108]
Originally by: San Severina
I can only assume they haven't done their research & have been misinformed here by the disturbing amount of dishonest posts from dubious alt characters calling anyone not satisfied malcontents & whiners.
What...as oppose to you malcontents calling anyone who disagrees with you Trolls, Dev Alts or worse. Pot calling the kettle black much?
|
Niccolado Starwalker
Gallente Shadow Templars
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:01:00 -
[109]
Originally by: San Severina
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson I'm not through beating CCP with my big ****ing stick, are you?
I'm finding it hard to keep motivated now that I've quit but... I have 9 days left & I've committed to read EvE-O everyday & at least try to counter the obvious ALT/Fanboi rhetoric, if only because idiots & stooges sicken me.
It's extremely disheartening to see players constantly misunderstanding the statement on the future of the game. I honestly don't understand why people think the old hangar is coming back & CQ is going to be optional when the statement makes it clear nothing of the sort will happen.
I can only assume they haven't done their research & have been misinformed here by the disturbing amount of dishonest posts from dubious alt characters calling anyone not satisfied malcontents & whiners.
You sicken me too, but I will win, since you quit and I will prevail and continue roaming new eden!
Originally by: Dianabolic Your tears are absolutely divine, like a fine fine wine, rolling down your cheeks until they flow down the river of LOL. |
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:05:00 -
[110]
Edited by: AkJon Ferguson on 05/07/2011 09:06:28
Originally by: Dorvab Arnst Edited by: Dorvab Arnst on 05/07/2011 08:37:00 Edited by: Dorvab Arnst on 05/07/2011 08:35:48 Despite what you might think, your protest didnt fail. CCP listened and did alot more to placate all of you children than any other MMO company would have done. Ill liste some of my own reasons I think this protest was stupid, I think that it would be more appropriate:
1-10
1. No, it wasn't based on speculation. It was based on what CCP said it planned to do in Fearless. And no, that wasn't some speculative, theoretical debate, we've already debunked that. Please keep up.
2. The protest was led by a bunch of veteran EVE players. We agree on that. The rest of your post is just ad hominem garbage.
3. Now you're just lying. The full version was MORE damning. It contained the 'golden goose' quote. And here's what the disclaimer ACTUALLY said: "DISCLAIMER: The views put forward in this magazine do not reflect general CCP company policies or decisions and are strictly individual opinions, written by CCPers or about CCPers who feel strongly about these issues." CCPers who feel strongly about these issues, get it? You somehow get "said memo did not reflect the policies or the mind set of employees at CCP" confused with "CCPers who feel strongly about these issues"? I wish your side would stop lying about Fearless. Your lies have been debunked.
4. "All you did was alienate yourselves by making the game unplayable for some people in the game." I think you have us confused with CCP.
5. No disagreement from me.
6. I think you pulled that # from your ass. Substantiate. Besides, I'm a customer. I don't care how many other customers are unhappy. If I'm unhappy and have excellent reason to be unhappy, I complain. Besides, your hero, soundwave, disagrees with you. I can pull the quote if you missed it.
7. I'm sorry we brought down the usual tone of discourse in Jita local. (Surely he's not serious?)
8. I said that already in 2 of my list. No argument here.
9. I didn't spend any time in Jita, but it seems a logical place to stage a protest to me and I thought the video they made was pretty cool. Shrug.
10. I think you ran out of ideas and posted your 6 again.
Want to buy a monocle? |
|
Dorvab Arnst
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:08:00 -
[111]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Edited by: AkJon Ferguson on 05/07/2011 09:06:28
Originally by: Dorvab Arnst Edited by: Dorvab Arnst on 05/07/2011 08:37:00 Edited by: Dorvab Arnst on 05/07/2011 08:35:48 Despite what you might think, your protest didnt fail. CCP listened and did alot more to placate all of you children than any other MMO company would have done. Ill liste some of my own reasons I think this protest was stupid, I think that it would be more appropriate:
1-10
1. No, it wasn't based on speculation. It was based on what CCP said it planned to do in Fearless. And no, that wasn't some speculative, theoretical debate, we've already debunked that. Please keep up.
2. The protest was led by a bunch of veteran EVE players. We agree on that. The rest of your post is just ad hominem garbage.
3. Now you're just lying. The full version was MORE damning. It contained the 'golden goose' quote. And here's what the disclaimer ACTUALLY said: "DISCLAIMER: The views put forward in this magazine do not reflect general CCP company policies or decisions and are strictly individual opinions, written by CCPers or about CCPers who feel strongly about these issues." CCPers who feel strongly about these issues, get it? You somehow get "said memo did not reflect the policies or the mind set of employees at CCP" confused with "CCPers who feel strongly about these issues"? I wish your side would stop lying about Fearless. Your lies have been debunked.
4. "All you did was alienate yourselves by making the game unplayable for some people in the game." I think you have us confused with CCP.
5. No disagreement from me.
6. I think you pulled that # from your ass. Substantiate. Besides, I'm a customer. I don't care how many other customers are unhappy. If I'm unhappy and have excellent reason to be unhappy, I complain. Besides, your hero, soundwave, disagrees with you. I can pull the quote if you missed it.
7. I'm sorry we brought down the usual tone of discourse in Jita local. (Surely he's not serious?)
8. I said that already in 2 of my list. No argument here.
9. I didn't spend any time in Jita, but it seems a logical place to stage a protest to me and I thought the video they made was pretty cool. Shrug.
10. I think you ran out of ideas and posted your 6 again.
Ahhh yes...cherry picking, quote mining and taking thing out of context. If you dont like the game, and you feel your protest was not successful. Leave...you wont be missed, trust me on that.
|
Kalle Demos
Amarr Helix Protocol
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:10:00 -
[112]
ITT: White Tree confesses to getting emo over a paid vacation .
LETS POST ON CAOD GANG! |
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:18:00 -
[113]
Originally by: Dorvab Arnst
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Edited by: AkJon Ferguson on 05/07/2011 09:06:28
Originally by: Dorvab Arnst Edited by: Dorvab Arnst on 05/07/2011 08:37:00 Edited by: Dorvab Arnst on 05/07/2011 08:35:48 Despite what you might think, your protest didnt fail. CCP listened and did alot more to placate all of you children than any other MMO company would have done. Ill liste some of my own reasons I think this protest was stupid, I think that it would be more appropriate:
1-10
1. No, it wasn't based on speculation. It was based on what CCP said it planned to do in Fearless. And no, that wasn't some speculative, theoretical debate, we've already debunked that. Please keep up.
2. The protest was led by a bunch of veteran EVE players. We agree on that. The rest of your post is just ad hominem garbage.
3. Now you're just lying. The full version was MORE damning. It contained the 'golden goose' quote. And here's what the disclaimer ACTUALLY said: "DISCLAIMER: The views put forward in this magazine do not reflect general CCP company policies or decisions and are strictly individual opinions, written by CCPers or about CCPers who feel strongly about these issues." CCPers who feel strongly about these issues, get it? You somehow get "said memo did not reflect the policies or the mind set of employees at CCP" confused with "CCPers who feel strongly about these issues"? I wish your side would stop lying about Fearless. Your lies have been debunked.
4. "All you did was alienate yourselves by making the game unplayable for some people in the game." I think you have us confused with CCP.
5. No disagreement from me.
6. I think you pulled that # from your ass. Substantiate. Besides, I'm a customer. I don't care how many other customers are unhappy. If I'm unhappy and have excellent reason to be unhappy, I complain. Besides, your hero, soundwave, disagrees with you. I can pull the quote if you missed it.
7. I'm sorry we brought down the usual tone of discourse in Jita local. (Surely he's not serious?)
8. I said that already in 2 of my list. No argument here.
9. I didn't spend any time in Jita, but it seems a logical place to stage a protest to me and I thought the video they made was pretty cool. Shrug.
10. I think you ran out of ideas and posted your 6 again.
Ahhh yes...cherry picking, quote mining and taking thing out of context. If you dont like the game, and you feel your protest was not successful. Leave...you wont be missed, trust me on that.
Nobody is going to trust you on anything, you've already been caught lying right here. And I'm getting tired of anonymous ALTS telling Main characters that post their honest thoughts here that they won't be missed!
yes, they will be missed. Of course they will, lots of players are missed everyday.
One thing I can guarantee won't be missed is ALTS posting ridiculous, stupid, trolling comments in otherwise perfectly thoughtful & honest treads. I can guarantee that wouldn't be missed.
|
Dorvab Arnst
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:20:00 -
[114]
Originally by: San Severina
Originally by: Dorvab Arnst
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Edited by: AkJon Ferguson on 05/07/2011 09:06:28
Originally by: Dorvab Arnst Edited by: Dorvab Arnst on 05/07/2011 08:37:00 Edited by: Dorvab Arnst on 05/07/2011 08:35:48 Despite what you might think, your protest didnt fail. CCP listened and did alot more to placate all of you children than any other MMO company would have done. Ill liste some of my own reasons I think this protest was stupid, I think that it would be more appropriate:
1-10
1. No, it wasn't based on speculation. It was based on what CCP said it planned to do in Fearless. And no, that wasn't some speculative, theoretical debate, we've already debunked that. Please keep up.
2. The protest was led by a bunch of veteran EVE players. We agree on that. The rest of your post is just ad hominem garbage.
3. Now you're just lying. The full version was MORE damning. It contained the 'golden goose' quote. And here's what the disclaimer ACTUALLY said: "DISCLAIMER: The views put forward in this magazine do not reflect general CCP company policies or decisions and are strictly individual opinions, written by CCPers or about CCPers who feel strongly about these issues." CCPers who feel strongly about these issues, get it? You somehow get "said memo did not reflect the policies or the mind set of employees at CCP" confused with "CCPers who feel strongly about these issues"? I wish your side would stop lying about Fearless. Your lies have been debunked.
4. "All you did was alienate yourselves by making the game unplayable for some people in the game." I think you have us confused with CCP.
5. No disagreement from me.
6. I think you pulled that # from your ass. Substantiate. Besides, I'm a customer. I don't care how many other customers are unhappy. If I'm unhappy and have excellent reason to be unhappy, I complain. Besides, your hero, soundwave, disagrees with you. I can pull the quote if you missed it.
7. I'm sorry we brought down the usual tone of discourse in Jita local. (Surely he's not serious?)
8. I said that already in 2 of my list. No argument here.
9. I didn't spend any time in Jita, but it seems a logical place to stage a protest to me and I thought the video they made was pretty cool. Shrug.
10. I think you ran out of ideas and posted your 6 again.
Ahhh yes...cherry picking, quote mining and taking thing out of context. If you dont like the game, and you feel your protest was not successful. Leave...you wont be missed, trust me on that.
Nobody is going to trust you on anything, you've already been caught lying right here. And I'm getting tired of anonymous ALTS telling Main characters that post their honest thoughts here that they won't be missed!
yes, they will be missed. Of course they will, lots of players are missed everyday.
One thing I can guarantee won't be missed is ALTS posting ridiculous, stupid, trolling comments in otherwise perfectly thoughtful & honest treads. I can guarantee that wouldn't be missed.
You see...this here is your problem as a whole. You accuse people who disagree with you of being an Alt. This is my main thank you. Dont believe me, thats fine. No skin off of my nose. But by accusing people of being Trolls, or being Dev Alts or alts or worse...you are losing all sympathy anyone may have had for you and your 'cause'.
|
C4LYP50
Solarwind Interstellar Mining and Production Ltd
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:26:00 -
[115]
Originally by: AnzacPaul
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
How dare you try and turn this on the player base. You should be disgusted in yourself.
YOU chose to go to the summit. YOU chose to drop everything to save YOUR game of internet spaceships.
Dont sit there and pretend like you were saving the world. The meeting would have gone no different had you been there or not. CCP knew long before they invited you how much they were willing to give and what they wouldnt give.
All we got were a bunch of bull **** statements telling us absoloutely nothing but a bunch of articulated spin that will no doubt see the introduction of a lot of features into the game soon that YOU and CCP decided were ok for the majority of us.
+1
Brunette By Birth...........Blonde By Nature. ------------------------------------------------ "Your suffering will be legendary, even in Hell." "No tears, please; it's a waste of good |
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:30:00 -
[116]
Originally by: Dorvab Arnst
Originally by: San Severina
I can only assume they haven't done their research & have been misinformed here by the disturbing amount of dishonest posts from dubious alt characters calling anyone not satisfied malcontents & whiners.
What...as oppose to you malcontents calling anyone who disagrees with you Trolls, Dev Alts or worse. Pot calling the kettle black much?
When I see someone with no posting history, no kb history, who is spouting CCP lies, I suspect him of being a dev alt. That seems reasonable to me. If you're not a CCP alt, have the balls to post on your main. In the exceedingly unlikely event that you're a genuine noob, then educate yourself before you open your piehole again. Thanks.
I've submitted considerably fewer than 10 petitions in my 2.5 years of playing EVE with 4-5 toons. I am hardly a whiner. I am a customer who is dissatisfied with a defective product I have paid for and who is complaining about it. I am a customer who has heard that the company I ordered and prepaid for steaks from plans to deliver hamburger helper instead and I'm letting that company know that's not acceptable. That makes me ... normal I guess?
Want to buy a monocle? |
Dorvab Arnst
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:32:00 -
[117]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Originally by: Dorvab Arnst
Originally by: San Severina
I can only assume they haven't done their research & have been misinformed here by the disturbing amount of dishonest posts from dubious alt characters calling anyone not satisfied malcontents & whiners.
What...as oppose to you malcontents calling anyone who disagrees with you Trolls, Dev Alts or worse. Pot calling the kettle black much?
When I see someone with no posting history, no kb history, who is spouting CCP lies, I suspect him of being a dev alt. That seems reasonable to me. If you're not a CCP alt, have the balls to post on your main. In the exceedingly unlikely event that you're a genuine noob, then educate yourself before you open your piehole again. Thanks.
I've submitted considerably fewer than 10 petitions in my 2.5 years of playing EVE with 4-5 toons. I am hardly a whiner. I am a customer who is dissatisfied with a defective product I have paid for and who is complaining about it. I am a customer who has heard that the company I ordered and prepaid for steaks from plans to deliver hamburger helper instead and I'm letting that company know that's not acceptable. That makes me ... normal I guess?
Okay, let me make this really clear to you. THIS IS MY MAIN YOU MORON!
Not all of us have been playing the game for as long as some and some of us dont usually come to the troll fest that is the forums becuase its full of ****nuts like you.
|
Def Antares
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:33:00 -
[118]
Edited by: Def Antares on 05/07/2011 09:33:39
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Originally by: Dorvab Arnst
Originally by: San Severina
I can only assume they haven't done their research & have been misinformed here by the disturbing amount of dishonest posts from dubious alt characters calling anyone not satisfied malcontents & whiners.
What...as oppose to you malcontents calling anyone who disagrees with you Trolls, Dev Alts or worse. Pot calling the kettle black much?
When I see someone with no posting history, no kb history, who is spouting CCP lies, I suspect him of being a dev alt. That seems reasonable to me. If you're not a CCP alt, have the balls to post on your main. In the exceedingly unlikely event that you're a genuine noob, then educate yourself before you open your piehole again. Thanks.
I've submitted considerably fewer than 10 petitions in my 2.5 years of playing EVE with 4-5 toons. I am hardly a whiner. I am a customer who is dissatisfied with a defective product I have paid for and who is complaining about it. I am a customer who has heard that the company I ordered and prepaid for steaks from plans to deliver hamburger helper instead and I'm letting that company know that's not acceptable. That makes me ... normal I guess?
complain as much as you want but dont automatically expect everyone to be involved in an anti-you conspiracy because to 99% of the people life goes on ... omg
|
Ciar Meara
Amarr Virtus Vindice
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:38:00 -
[119]
It did not fail, we protested and we where heared.
The truth of the statements made by CCP and the intentions of the CSM lies as always in the actions they'll take in the coming weeks, months and years.
Like a great women once said:
I trust you completely, until you betray me - Hilmar getur ekki tala= vi= ¦ig n·na, hann er a= fara ß japanska Tfskuverslun.
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:40:00 -
[120]
Originally by: Dorvab Arnst
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Originally by: Dorvab Arnst
Originally by: San Severina
I can only assume they haven't done their research & have been misinformed here by the disturbing amount of dishonest posts from dubious alt characters calling anyone not satisfied malcontents & whiners.
What...as oppose to you malcontents calling anyone who disagrees with you Trolls, Dev Alts or worse. Pot calling the kettle black much?
When I see someone with no posting history, no kb history, who is spouting CCP lies, I suspect him of being a dev alt. That seems reasonable to me. If you're not a CCP alt, have the balls to post on your main. In the exceedingly unlikely event that you're a genuine noob, then educate yourself before you open your piehole again. Thanks.
I've submitted considerably fewer than 10 petitions in my 2.5 years of playing EVE with 4-5 toons. I am hardly a whiner. I am a customer who is dissatisfied with a defective product I have paid for and who is complaining about it. I am a customer who has heard that the company I ordered and prepaid for steaks from plans to deliver hamburger helper instead and I'm letting that company know that's not acceptable. That makes me ... normal I guess?
Okay, let me make this really clear to you. THIS IS MY MAIN YOU MORON!
Not all of us have been playing the game for as long as some and some of us dont usually come to the troll fest that is the forums becuase its full of ****nuts like you.
Did I stutter? "In the exceedingly unlikely event that you're a genuine noob, then educate yourself before you open your piehole again. Thanks." Run along, troll.
Want to buy a monocle? |
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:43:00 -
[121]
Originally by: Ciar Meara Like a great women once said:
I trust you completely, until you betray me
And like a great war criminal once said:
"Fool me once, shame on ù shame on you. Fool me ù you can't get fooled again."
Want to buy a monocle? |
Dr Lebroi
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:44:00 -
[122]
I have no affiliation to CSM or it's members but I do think they should be extended a little respect for dropping everything and going to Iceland. Seriously, how many people on this forum would actually get on a plane from USA to Iceland with a day and a halfs notice? Not that many I bet.
As to the result for the summit. It played out as real world diplomacy always plays out. All sides got a little of what they wanted but no one was an out right winner that's how it goes. I know your moms and dads always paint your room the colour you want it but when you get older you realise that sometimes you have to use whatever paint is cheapest in the shop. PEACE.
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:48:00 -
[123]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson I'm not through beating CCP with my big ****ing stick, are you?
There are people who protest because they feel it's the right thing to do at the time and there are people who protest because it makes them feel important. I think you fall into the latter group.
You have not even given CCP much time do anything about what was discussed. So you want them to do what you want, but you don't have the backing of most of the protesters.
You can theorise all you want about what the future holds but that does not mean you can tell the future anymore than I can. Sure we can have an idea of what it might be like based on our experiences in life and other MMOs in this case, but that does not mean we would be necessarily right.
As a friend used to say who's no longer with us,'cross those bridges when you come to them' another words stop worrying about things that have not happened yet. If it becomes clear in the future that non-vanity items will be introduced (based on fact) then there will be more protesting. But now is not the time, you have to give CCP time to actually be able to do something.
Now is not the time to protest unless you like protesting for the sake of it of course.
|
Cailais
Amarr Dawn of a new Empire The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:54:00 -
[124]
Dear OP,
I think you're expecting definite solutions as a result of mass protest. Mass protests can rarely communicate defined arguments - by simple merit of them being 'mass' or of many points of view.
In simple terms the protesters consisted of a large group of players each with particular complaints they wanted addressed from CCP's communications issues, to NeX costs, to 'gold ammo'.
In that respect the win/fail conditions were based upon:
"We are unhappy about a number of issues, please recognise this and enter into a dialogue with us"
Which the extraordinary CSM / CCP meeting achieved. Whether we like what was communicated determines if future demonstrations of unhappiness occur, which broadly speaking has not happened.
C.
'GREED IS GOOD' - CCP 2011 (ಠ_O)
|
Cashcow Golden Goose
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:56:00 -
[125]
Originally by: Dr Lebroi I have no affiliation to CSM or it's members but I do think they should be extended a little respect for dropping everything and going to Iceland. Seriously, how many people on this forum would actually get on a plane from USA to Iceland with a day and a halfs notice? Not that many I bet.
You buy my ticket, I will go literally anywhere, right now. Except the USA and anywhere recently turned into a warzone by the USA.
Seriously, test me. Buy me a ticket, I will go there, right now, and agree to regurgitate any lie you want. I'll even make a youtube video of all the lies that need regurgitating.
I will, I'll do it. Test me.
|
Ladyfemke
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 09:56:00 -
[126]
My own thoughts are somewhat with the OP and with the anti-protesters who critic the OP.
I will ignore the swearing, insulting and flaming that people on the forums seem they need to indulge in to get their point across, as I have promised myself that I am no longer going that route as I have in the past a little.
The protest was a partial success and for now the protesters have managed to stave off what I think will eventually become a part of EVE.
The wording of the official statements from CCP clearly appears to mirror political speak where the politicians dance all around the definitive yes/no answers that questioners demand. Whether definitive truth has become a forgotten value in todays modern real, and game life I don't know, But I have to admit that at my late age in life it seems to be that way. Don't flame me for these statements they only mirror my own thoughts of a fair number of years.
I am unsubbed, as is my life partner, a total of our four accounts at this time although we still have until August on 2 of them to run. They were unsubbed a week before this blew up so it wasn't as a result of the protests, we were just getting a little bored and wanted to go elsewhere for a while. We have done this before, and so no we wont be giving our stuffs away, and we shall monitor EVE from afar and hope that the game doesn't change too much.
I think though regardless of what may have been won, retained or lost, the biggest loss for us is the trust in CCP to maintain their word and to refuse to commit to that kind of truthful answer that so many of us wished, even demanded as a right in exchange for our loyalty to pay our subscriptions.
Some of you may say that our loyalty isn't that great as we have left before and returned. But when here we are paying, and our subscriptions do support EVE, and that means to us anyway when we play we have a right to expect what we pay for.
I suppose whether we return in the future will depend on what direction we see the game taking.
So good luck to you all and fly safe. Oh yes please try to be nicer to each other and stop all the flames it makes us seem very immature and childish when we do it.
|
Cashcow Golden Goose
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:01:00 -
[127]
Originally by: Dr Lebroi As to the result for the summit. It played out as real world diplomacy always plays out. All sides got a little of what they wanted but no one was an out right winner that's how it goes. I know your moms and dads always paint your room the colour you want it but when you get older you realise that sometimes you have to use whatever paint is cheapest in the shop. PEACE.
Yes, it did play out as real world diplomacy. One side got everything they wanted and agreed to give the other side all the publicity they need to not look like they lost out, big time.
The protesters got literally nothing. Literally. Not figuratively, literally. They simply got nothing.
CCP maintained their previously stated positions and placated the entire community at the cost of a few plane tickets, a youtube video and a few platitudiness forum posts.
I am so impressed with CCP figuratively pushing fresh excrement right down the protestors pie holes and having them love it that I am resubbing all 11 accounts. It was absolutely beautiful to watch. You can't buy entertainment like that. Where would you go?
"Dear Sir, I want to watch roughly 5000 idiots pretend to be passionate about something and then watch 95% of them be placated with the exact same words that made them mad in the first place" Nowhere does that service, you cannot buy it.
|
General Windypops
The Littlest Hobos En Garde
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:08:00 -
[128]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
Sorry, White Tree but that's an absolutely ludicrous response. Application to the CSM was entirely voluntary and you should only have thrown your hat in the ring because you WANTED to contribute. Myself, and many others willingly put ourselves forward, but the Goonswarn / NC campaign to block vote and seize control of the CSM you and Mittens decided to orchestrate put you where you are.
If you don't have the desire, energy or ability to sit on the CSM them you have only yourself (and your political agenda) to blame.
As for why the 'protest' failed I don't think it failed in the slightest. My main observation is that whilst the way CCP managed the whole issue reflected very poorly on them, the way some parts of the community conducted themselves also reflects badly on all of us. Seeing people blackmail, threaten and abuse CCP staff, coupled with the wildly inflated and blatantly false claims of unsubscriptions from thousands of faceless alts undermined our credibility, maturity and contribution to the debate.
CSM 6: Let's get Windypops indypops. |
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:10:00 -
[129]
Dr Lebroi - You get what you settle for.
Tanya - If you look at the quote in context, you'll see the big stick refers to unsubbing, not protesting.
Cailais - I agree that there were many points of view among the protesters. CSM did a **** poor job of condensing them, settling on the most popular/logical ones, and sticking to their guns. Even if that meant no agreement.
Cash - Pretty much.
Ladyfemke - Hope EVE becomes a game you want to come back to. Fly safe.
Late here, ttfn.
Want to buy a monocle? |
Medidranda Livoga
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:12:00 -
[130]
Edited by: Medidranda Livoga on 05/07/2011 10:15:30 It is true that players actually got nothing factual out of it and thus this CCP / CSM thing feels mostly like charade. But the whole point was to:
a) Stretch this whole thing to couple weeks to dissipate some of the anger b) This same thing also gave people time to convince themselves that it is not going to be so bad (addicts bargaining) c) Get away with not promising things definitely (corporate leeway if you will)
The whole situation is bit like a family feud: People get really mad but unfortunately everyone loses if break-up occurs. CCP loses their meal ticket and players lose their game.
However, less players care about their game more leverage they have. Disillusioned subscriber can push the unsub button and keep it pressed without real disruption to their lives. Addicted subber will feel tremendous discomfort by not playing and is willing to compromise and be milked for more cash even if he should wail in forums for a bit.
|
|
Chuffer
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:15:00 -
[131]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
Your efforts and those of the rest of the CSM group are greatly appreciated, and the result imo was largely a success. The riotous element of the player base appears to have been pacified (albeit temporarily) and its almost business as usual.
A question though; did you ever think to try video conferencing? Or maybe even just netmeeting and audio conferencing? Being elected to a position of some importance among a gaming community is quite spiffy, but its still only a hobby. A video game. And sacrificing your physical well being for it seems inane, especially with all the various communication tools at your disposal.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:20:00 -
[132]
Originally by: Medidranda Livoga Edited by: Medidranda Livoga on 05/07/2011 10:15:30 It is true that players actually got nothing factual out of it and thus this CCP / CSM thing feels mostly like charade. But the whole point was to:
a) Stretch this whole thing to couple weeks to dissipate some of the anger b) This same thing also gave people time to convince themselves that it is not going to be so bad (addicts bargaining) c) Get away with not promising things definitely (corporate leeway if you will)
The whole situation is bit like a family feud: People get really mad but unfortunately everyone loses if break-up occurs. CCP loses their meal ticket and players lose their game.
However, less players care about their game more leverage they have. Disillusioned subscriber can push the unsub button and keep it pressed without real disruption to their lives. Addicted subber will feel tremendous discomfort by not playing and is willing to compromise and be milked for more cash even if he should wail in forums for a bit.
yep & yep.
|
Othran
Brutor Tribe
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:23:00 -
[133]
Regardless of "success" or "failure" the playerbase now know what button to press (literally) to get CCPs attention PDQ.
It will happen again.
|
General Windypops
The Littlest Hobos En Garde
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:30:00 -
[134]
Originally by: Othran Regardless of "success" or "failure" the playerbase now know what button to press (literally) to get CCPs attention PDQ.
It will happen again.
It's this kind of attitude that, to my mind, is utterly immature and reflects so badly on us. The enthusiasm and glee of some parts of the playerbase to blackmail and **** stir dissent because of their enjoyment of the 'drama' of protests is just pathetic.
CSM 6: Let's get Windypops indypops. |
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:34:00 -
[135]
Originally by: Cashcow Golden Goose
Originally by: Dr Lebroi As to the result for the summit. It played out as real world diplomacy always plays out. All sides got a little of what they wanted but no one was an out right winner that's how it goes. I know your moms and dads always paint your room the colour you want it but when you get older you realise that sometimes you have to use whatever paint is cheapest in the shop. PEACE.
Yes, it did play out as real world diplomacy. One side got everything they wanted and agreed to give the other side all the publicity they need to not look like they lost out, big time.
The protesters got literally nothing. Literally. Not figuratively, literally. They simply got nothing.
CCP maintained their previously stated positions and placated the entire community at the cost of a few plane tickets, a youtube video and a few platitudiness forum posts.
I am so impressed with CCP figuratively pushing fresh excrement right down the protestors pie holes and having them love it that I am resubbing all 11 accounts. It was absolutely beautiful to watch. You can't buy entertainment like that. Where would you go?
"Dear Sir, I want to watch roughly 5000 idiots pretend to be passionate about something and then watch 95% of them be placated with the exact same words that made them mad in the first place" Nowhere does that service, you cannot buy it.
I was not impressed with the blog, did not even bother to watch the vid.
All 5 of my accounts remain closed although 4 were not active at the time of the crisis anyway. Reason they are remaining closed is mainly because of the way CCP handled the whole affair.
It was always going to be a PR exercise, those types of meetings always are. But that in itself is not necessarily a bad thing.
You seem to forget CCP can't afford to be seen giving into protesters demands completely, they probably answered in the only way they felt they could. The ball so to speak is in CCP's court at the moment, it'll be interesting to see what CCP actually does with it.
|
Miss Rabblt
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:41:00 -
[136]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson CCP agrees that since we have paid for 2 expansions per year with our inflated monthly subscription, and since this expansion is all about Spaceship Barbies, that they will allow us to play dressup with our Spaceship Barbies for 'free' (since we've already paid for it with our inflated monthly subscription.)
never heard about it (bold part). Any links to EULA or other document?
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:46:00 -
[137]
Originally by: Othran Regardless of "success" or "failure" the playerbase now know what button to press (literally) to get CCPs attention PDQ.
It will happen again.
You should get the CSMs attention and let them negotiate with CCP.
But you won't hold CCP to ransom, they can't afford to go down that road. It's not the same as a parent giving into their child because the parent wants a quiet life.
|
Banstyle
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:47:00 -
[138]
Originally by: White Tree We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems.
|
Cadela Fria
Amarr x13 Raiden.
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 10:55:00 -
[139]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Originally by: baltec1 It stopped because the bulk of us didnt want none vanity items. CCP has now said the will not go down that road so we are happy again.
Its as simple as that.
No, they didn't. And no, it's not.
I think it's fair to say that if Incarna had been released with the option to dock-to-hangar, had included a greater variety of prices in the MT store, and had included a commitment from CCP to never sell non-vanity items or convenience or functionality EVER, it would have still been the worst 'expansion' of all time.
So no, after stalling for over a week, (and jeopardizing the mental and physical health and well-being of poor White Tree,) a toothless statement that we have no plans to sell non-vanity items in our vanity items store (which is precisely what the statement says) doesn't cut it.
"It is CCPæs plan that the Noble Exchange (NeX store) will be used for the sale of vanity items only. There are no plans, and have been no plans, as per previous communication and CSM meetings, to introduce the sale of game breaking items or enhancements in the NeX store."
Yes they did. And yes, it is.
You're just worked up because you prefer a conspiracy theory to no theory at all. Your theory and view, creates more questions than it answers and I'm very convinced Occam would have a field day with you.
You *want* there to be a smoke screen, you *want* CCP to be lying to you, you *want* there to be an underlying message and "real" motive that, as far as you're concerned, only you and that crackpot group that agrees with you, can see. You *want* the things told to you that counteracts your theory, to be a deliberate fabrication, made to obscure "the truth". You essentially just want 2 things. Drama, and attention to yourself.
I'm sorry but you can't be helped, and I'm also sorry to inform you that: We won, the protest succeeded.
|
March rabbit
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 11:20:00 -
[140]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson When I see someone with no posting history, no kb history, who is spouting CCP lies, I suspect him of being a dev alt. That seems reasonable to me. If you're not a CCP alt, have the balls to post on your main. In the exceedingly unlikely event that you're a genuine noob, then educate yourself before you open your piehole again. Thanks.
You really disallow new people and/or not pvp-interested to have his own mind?
And what is about "have balls to post with your main"? What is recall to Rocky Balboa? Are you 11 years old boy? From your posts i can believe to it.
Usually i use my alt to post here but this time (especially for you kid) i have chosen my main. Maybe it will make you happy?
|
|
Ciar Meara
Amarr Virtus Vindice
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 11:24:00 -
[141]
Edited by: Ciar Meara on 05/07/2011 11:25:02
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
Well lets not go overboard, I assume the logistical problems of getting to Iceland where many and it didn't go flawless but you got there and where able to talk to CCP about most of the imminent concerns of the community and hatched out a response from CCP that was acceptable by most (me at least and I was really mad).
The greatest technical achievement EVE ever rolled out was the graphics update, the current CQ and the entire patch has to many problems, technical glitches and downright errors to be labelled "an achievement", although it has potential.
Originally by: General Windypops
Sorry, White Tree but that's an absolutely ludicrous response. Application to the CSM was entirely voluntary and you should only have thrown your hat in the ring because you WANTED to contribute. Myself, and many others willingly put ourselves forward, but the Goonswarn / NC campaign to block vote and seize control of the CSM you and Mittens decided to orchestrate put you where you are.
If you don't have the desire, energy or ability to sit on the CSM them you have only yourself (and your political agenda) to blame.
As for why the 'protest' failed I don't think it failed in the slightest. My main observation is that whilst the way CCP managed the whole issue reflected very poorly on them, the way some parts of the community conducted themselves also reflects badly on all of us. Seeing people blackmail, threaten and abuse CCP staff, coupled with the wildly inflated and blatantly false claims of unsubscriptions from thousands of faceless alts undermined our credibility, maturity and contribution to the debate.
You are right also, I don't think we failed either and CCP managed this whole mess very badly indeed. But they admitted that themselves and even CCP soundwave posted on the forums yesterday and sunday saying exactly that while again saying that "gold ammo" was a big no no.
However to drop everything on a few days notice and travel to Iceland for EvE is beyond the call of duty. People with jobs, lives and/or children and wives did their best in difficult circumstances and that has to acknowledged. You don't "just" travel to iceland, it takes a while to get there even from Europe. - Hilmar getur ekki tala= vi= ¦ig n·na, hann er a= fara ß japanska Tfskuverslun.
|
Cadela Fria
Amarr x13 Raiden.
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 11:27:00 -
[142]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
.....I suppose I should explain what winning would have looked like. Let's see if we can agree on a few facts:.....
First of all let me tell you a few facts. Recent patches have *not* introduced a countless amount of exploits, this is simply fluff added in to bolster your argument. Second of all, every single major patch in EVE's history, has introduced a heap load of new bugs - I mean were you here when they changed over to the new graphics engine?
Now as far as the "low end computers able to run EVE", I'm sorry to say this, however you're entirely wrong. Technology has to move forward and EVE always, from the very beginning, pushed to be on the bleeding edge of technological game advancement, have you heard them talk about the initial prototype they showed of EVE and publishers said that this kind of graphics couldn't be done realtime and especially not in an MMO. It was nice that EVE ran on smaller machines back then, but it cant keep doing it forever, eventually the bar has to move upwards.
The last patch (incarna) did *not* fry/overheat *any* video cards. If it really did there'd be a great sum of money to be paid to customers by CCP, like the boot.ini incident, which really did happen. You are again, I'm sorry to say, completely wrong and speaking from..what I can only guess..complete ignorance. There is no such thing as code and/or rendering that will fry/overheat your graphics card. Your graphics card is governed by its drivers, and all *it* does is tell your graphics card how fast it can go and in what ways - *All* EVE can do is give your card a set of instructions and tell it to do these as fast as it can. In other words, poor drivers and/or cooling and/or broken hardware is your problem, not EVE.
As far as how much money is allocated to the development of EVE, I don't know...I admit that. But neither do you! - It is rather pointless to sit and try to cleverly speak of the financial circumstances of something you couldn't *possibly* know for certain. Yes there are 2 other games in development, but that proves nothing..you'd have to make a number of uninformed assumptions about the financial structure regarding these projects, and doing so can lead you anywhere you want to go..like say for instance...to saying EVE is inadequately funded.
So far we are in complete disagreements..now moving on to your "one liners":
1: Yes we agree, but I believe they will do this eventually
2. No we don't agree. Now while I don't like Aurum or any of this NeX thing, I simply don't agree it was part of winning this protest.
3. Redundant fluff point that means the same as the above
4. No we don't agree, simply because it wasn't part of what we were protesting against. However I do agree vanity items should be craftable by us, and marketed by us, and so forth, leaving the MT part for things like faction clothing etc.
5. No we don't agree, because thats not what he said. While you could draw a path to him saying that, it just won't make it true..What you said there is called spin, and I'm not impressed.
6. Redundant, already been said, more fluff
7. You're wanting your cake and to eat it to. You can't force respect in, and given your burblings about financial reallocation, you make no educated guesses about what happens if you do that.
On your ending points, your snide sarcasm and sneering about the CSM and what went on, is pathethic. It invalidates everything you said beforehand and leads me to think you need to grow up.
|
Merelle
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 11:41:00 -
[143]
Edited by: Merelle on 05/07/2011 11:44:01 nevermind
|
Magnus Ahearn
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 11:46:00 -
[144]
I watched you cry and whine and moan about everything the past few weeks, and guess what: All the massive fail came because of uninformed ****s like you. Yes I was against non-vanity items, and once CCP gave their word, I gave it up. I honestly don't mind Incarna, and it hasn't caused me any massive hardware issues, other than the occasional ctd. So, get off your high horse, and come back down to reality. Trust me, it's safer that way. If you want to cry and wine and moan, then go play WoW and get your hand held at every turn, and in the process make EVE one less whiny troll. Quit blaming everyone because you didn't get your way.
kthnxbai
404 Error, Sig not found. Retry? Cancel? REBOOT EVE? |
Azztoroid
Shipwreck cove
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:03:00 -
[145]
Had abit time to think and put things in content.
Was the protests valid, i belive that, mostly to send a sign to CCP that we as players are a voice to be heard.
The fearless. I actualy have seen that type of provocations send out to a staff, so by it self its nothing.
The leaked E-mail. I do understand it, we just "unfortently" tied it to the rest of stuf going on.
The first blog was nothing but a panic letter that shouldnt have been postet. The zulu blog is an emotional reaction on the trust leake within CCP, just fell right into the powder can.
So what do i want with all this. The entire situation comes down to a chain of events. By them self they are no problem, but mix them up and you have havoc.
Both sides have had there failures.
CCP payed $ to get the CSM to iceland, they choose to hear us rather than just remain silent. The NDA part is understandeble since they do have figures that should not be revealed outside CCP. Many of the protesters did the protests becasue of love to the game, YES WE DO LOVE THE GAME!! but the huge "blackspot" non vanity will destroy the game as a sandbox, and we choose to fight it before it landed right into our laps. We were not sure if it was the plans, but we had to send a message that we didnt want it.
Right now there is the word puzzles, plans, never oooh they bla bla, some will never be satisfied, CCP could show us a leagal document where it said NEVER EVER and some would stil dispute it.
Did we get CCP to the table: Yes Did we get atleast some out of it: Yes Did the CSM stand up for the players: Yes Did both sides learn from this: hopefully yes
Azz
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Thanks CSM i salute you
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* |
Supple Boy Toucher
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:03:00 -
[146]
I haven't read a single post in this thread, but I just wanted to post to say that you have some beautiful DSLs, OP.
|
Rue Cassels
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:09:00 -
[147]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
Dude if it really cost you that much to do it, don't present yourself anymore.
|
El'Niaga
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:11:00 -
[148]
The protests worked OP...why do you think there was a CSM emergency summit?
There was no way they'd address everyone's concern but they addressed the concerns of the majority of the protesters :)
|
Kerrisone
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:12:00 -
[149]
Just wanted to say OP nailed the issues in this thread through the various replies and wanted to thank him for continuing to post on these issues.
My opinion is that the staggered sub, lack of alternate engaging sandbox game, and the large portion of players who were begging for a lie to continue their habit are what 'did this in'. You have to add in CCP's position of power in dictating the terms of the 'accord', having ignored the vast majority of players who wanted no MT in EVE when asked CCP didn't care. Just as they didn't care this time with the issues presented, hardly a 'great' company or even one worth my time or effort.
Originally by: Ghoest Ill watch what you do not what you say.
|
Zeg Quul
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:12:00 -
[150]
Originally by: Terminal Insanity And the #1 reason why the protests failed: They were protesting over something that didnt/wasnt going to exist!
guess, ppl like to pay for "things" which are not existent
|
|
Cutter Isaacson
Minmatar Fearsome Engine
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:14:00 -
[151]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Kudos to CCP for paying attention to the uprising and retaining the right to create your game how you see fit without ruining it for the majority of us and without causing irreparable damage to your company's financial future. Well played, CCP.
Here are 10 reasons (in no particular order) I think it failed:
1. It didn't
2. It didn't
3. It didn't
4. It didn't
5. It didn't
6. It didn't
7. It didn't
8. It didn't
9. It didn't
10. It didn't
Well done everyone
Fixing AkJon Fergsuons posts since 05/07/2011
AkJon Ferguson now with 100% less stupidity.
Originally by: Not CCP Zinfandel CCP Zinfandel: ****ING SPACE MONOCLES!
|
Chris Fierce
Caldari NoD Imperium
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:14:00 -
[152]
Originally by: Asuri Kinnes A bunch of codswallop from a blind sycophant ..
I've traveled around the world for pleasure and work. I LOVED every moment of it.
The CSM is crying about how he/she "actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests". So what, if he/she doesnt like doing it, then quit, its that simple. There is no pay involved and this person WANTED TO DO IT. The only one who is to blame for any bad health due to this, is the CSM. ---------------------------
I gashmoygadied her gaflavity with my googus. |
Tosser Galore
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:16:00 -
[153]
It's just words. We either see change or we don't
OP is right.
It's very hard to address specific issues since everything easily turns into a troll cascade with people RP "camps".
A lot of disillusioned players also took the opportunity to quit their eve addiction. The current "back burner" state of eve and CCP's future plans of MT/milking/double dipping eve subscribers just pushed them over the edge.
As every true propagandist knows you often chose to play your stakes high and expect to go home with 1/10 of projections, the higher play the more that 1/10th is worth.
|
Sam Redshift
Caldari PCG Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:17:00 -
[154]
Originally by: Kuronaga What do you believe the protest was attempting to do, Ferguson?
Because I believe it succeeded.
The purpose was to shine a negative light on CCP's actions and force them into a broad public action that the entire gaming world could see.
It did that spectacularly, and regardless of their true intentions if they back out of their promises now they have this ten minute long video showcasing their treachery for all time.
This would be far more damaging then any protest, so all in all... yea, the protest worked perfectly.
+1
Fully agree with you, Kuronaga.
Public spotlight was on EVE and CCP and all pilots will be carefully monitoring future development.
|
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:18:00 -
[155]
Originally by: AnzacPaul
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
How dare you try and turn this on the player base. You should be disgusted in yourself.
YOU chose to go to the summit. YOU chose to drop everything to save YOUR game of internet spaceships.
Dont sit there and pretend like you were saving the world. The meeting would have gone no different had you been there or not. CCP knew long before they invited you how much they were willing to give and what they wouldnt give.
All we got were a bunch of bull **** statements telling us absoloutely nothing but a bunch of articulated spin that will no doubt see the introduction of a lot of features into the game soon that YOU and CCP decided were ok for the majority of us.
This. White Tree you're a joke.
|
Cutter Isaacson
Minmatar Fearsome Engine
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:26:00 -
[156]
Originally by: Mag's
Originally by: AnzacPaul
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
How dare you try and turn this on the player base. You should be disgusted in yourself.
YOU chose to go to the summit. YOU chose to drop everything to save YOUR game of internet spaceships.
Dont sit there and pretend like you were saving the world. The meeting would have gone no different had you been there or not. CCP knew long before they invited you how much they were willing to give and what they wouldnt give.
All we got were a bunch of bull **** statements telling us absoloutely nothing but a bunch of articulated spin that will no doubt see the introduction of a lot of features into the game soon that YOU and CCP decided were ok for the majority of us.
This. White Tree you're a joke.
The only joke I see are the people whining at the CSM members. You guys voted for them, or didn't (in which case you have no right to complain) then when they drop everything in real life at a moments notice to fly out to Iceland to deal with this almighty mess AND come away with exactly the answers we were looking for, you sit here and scream at them.
Perhaps you aren't aware of how the summits usually work (it's the only explanation I can come up with for the stupidity in here) where the CSM are given set dates, well ahead of time, as to when they will be needed. The CSM can then plan ahead and make sure that there is nothing conflicting with those dates and everything goes smoothly.
This time round they had a weeks notice, at most, to get their arses to Iceland. They went because that is their job, yes, but this was the equivalent of getting a phone call at 3am on your day off telling you that you HAVE to come to work. And you wonder why some of the CSM members are ****ed off? With you and with CCP.
You people need to think before you post, you make the rest of us look bad.
Originally by: Not CCP Zinfandel CCP Zinfandel: ****ING SPACE MONOCLES!
|
Barakkus
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:31:00 -
[157]
Edited by: Barakkus on 05/07/2011 12:30:44 You do realize you have all been trolled into 6 pages of replies. - [SERVICE] Corp Standings For POS anchoring |
Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators Chubby Chuppers Chubba Chups
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:33:00 -
[158]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 05/07/2011 12:34:32
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
Collaborator somehow manages to take 72 hours to make a 10 hour flight and cries about it on forum .
SKUNK
(o)
|
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:37:00 -
[159]
Edited by: Mag''s on 05/07/2011 12:37:16
Originally by: Cutter Isaacson The only joke I see are the people whining at the CSM members. You guys voted for them, or didn't (in which case you have no right to complain) then when they drop everything in real life at a moments notice to fly out to Iceland to deal with this almighty mess AND come away with exactly the answers we were looking for, you sit here and scream at them.
Perhaps you aren't aware of how the summits usually work (it's the only explanation I can come up with for the stupidity in here) where the CSM are given set dates, well ahead of time, as to when they will be needed. The CSM can then plan ahead and make sure that there is nothing conflicting with those dates and everything goes smoothly.
This time round they had a weeks notice, at most, to get their arses to Iceland. They went because that is their job, yes, but this was the equivalent of getting a phone call at 3am on your day off telling you that you HAVE to come to work. And you wonder why some of the CSM members are ****ed off? With you and with CCP.
You people need to think before you post, you make the rest of us look bad.
Maybe you should actually read the blog. Then tell me what they gained exactly.... no really, I'd like to know.
|
Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators Chubby Chuppers Chubba Chups
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:41:00 -
[160]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 05/07/2011 12:42:23 Edited by: Le Skunk on 05/07/2011 12:41:30
Originally by: Mag's Edited by: Mag''s on 05/07/2011 12:37:16
Originally by: Cutter Isaacson The only joke I see are the people whining at the CSM members. You guys voted for them, or didn't (in which case you have no right to complain) then when they drop everything in real life at a moments notice to fly out to Iceland to deal with this almighty mess AND come away with exactly the answers we were looking for, you sit here and scream at them.
Perhaps you aren't aware of how the summits usually work (it's the only explanation I can come up with for the stupidity in here) where the CSM are given set dates, well ahead of time, as to when they will be needed. The CSM can then plan ahead and make sure that there is nothing conflicting with those dates and everything goes smoothly.
This time round they had a weeks notice, at most, to get their arses to Iceland. They went because that is their job, yes, but this was the equivalent of getting a phone call at 3am on your day off telling you that you HAVE to come to work. And you wonder why some of the CSM members are ****ed off? With you and with CCP.
You people need to think before you post, you make the rest of us look bad.
Maybe you should actually read the blog. Then tell me what they gained exactly.... no really, I'd like to know.
They got this:
introduce in some form at a future dateÖ
CCP pinned down! Not utterly vague and certainly worth the near physical and emotional collapse of some of the weaker CSM members.
SKUNK (o)
|
|
Moon Shadowfall
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 12:56:00 -
[161]
Edited by: Moon Shadowfall on 05/07/2011 12:56:01 The OP needs more Preparation-H....his butthurt isn't gone yet.
Seriously youve flamed, whined, called out anyone whose opinion is different than yours for 10 days running.
Please leave now to save your own sanity and ours.
|
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 15:14:00 -
[162]
Originally by: Le Skunk
Originally by: Mag's
Originally by: Cutter Isaacson Stuff.....
Maybe you should actually read the blog. Then tell me what they gained exactly.... no really, I'd like to know.
They got this:
introduce in some form at a future dateÖ
CCP pinned down! Not utterly vague and certainly worth the near physical and emotional collapse of some of the weaker CSM members.
SKUNK
Indeed.
|
Guillame Herschel
Gallente NME1
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 15:16:00 -
[163]
What protests?
|
Mara Villoso
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 15:19:00 -
[164]
Srsly? They neither failed nor succeeded, because the issue at hand was never actually an issue. Just something being imagined by the OCD'd. No gold ammo is coming or was ever coming. Done. Over. Out. Finished. |
Ezra Vouland
Lords 0f Justice Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 15:31:00 -
[165]
Protesters dit have to be called out as liars now for not quitting, I am amused.
|
RAW23
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 16:05:00 -
[166]
Originally by: Mara Villoso Srsly? They neither failed nor succeeded, because the issue at hand was never actually an issue. Just something being imagined by the OCD'd. No gold ammo is coming or was ever coming. Done. Over. Out. Finished.
And CCP's inhouse newsletter has no purpose other than to confuse CCP employees as to what's coming up in the future.
|
Ingvar Angst
Amarr Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 16:08:00 -
[167]
Originally by: White Tree ...snip for brevity...
White Tree, you all went above and beyond what I've seen anyone in any game ever do for their community. I know you're tired... don't let trolls like this get you when your edge is a bit off.
Well done indeed.
I only wish there was word available about comets appearing, especially in wormholes... sigh...
There is no monocle. |
Producer Drone
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 16:33:00 -
[168]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
Seriously don't blame the playerbase for your own inability to know what's worth "fighting" for considering the risk of your health for your internet spaceship hobby. Not the playerbase send you to Iceland ... CCP summoned you. And really: CCP's half-cooked blahblah statement is neither a sign of "fiercely discussions" nor of "fighting for the playerbase's interests".
The CSM could have had a real strong impact/influence on CCP - if they had choosen NOT to go to Iceland. And it would have been better for your health too
Originally by: White Tree We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems.
I don't know if i should whining or laughing hysterically. I'm sad.
|
Avid Bumhumper
Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 16:35:00 -
[169]
Protest didn't fail, CCP did.
*********************************** Current Subscription 3 Months Account Expires 18 August 2011 (in 43 days) |
Kumq uat
Gallente Guiding Hand Social Club Dystopia Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 17:15:00 -
[170]
Originally by: Kumq uat I am putting a 100 million bounty on the corpse of the op. I must be provided with a corpse and an API verified kill mail.
Also first person to buy me a monocle gets my eternal love.
I am just gonna put this right here. --------------------------------------- www.eve-pirate.com original author |
|
flummox
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 17:27:00 -
[171]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
the CSM is a volunteer program, no?
if you're not happy with the requirments needed to obtain and hold the positin, quit and give it up to someone who wants it way more than you do. you clearly do not appreciate the role you have willingly taken on and you show it by whining and moaning like a little child.
life, and EVE, isn't all parties and soft feather down pillows. this is what you have to do when things get bad. you can't just ***** about them when it doesn't go to your benefit.
you made yourself looke like a pathetic little *****. congrats.
flummox
EABOD |
Ana Vyr
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 17:37:00 -
[172]
It would have been easy for the community to get CCP to drop the MT store idea.
Don't use it.
They aren't going to devote resources to something that makes them no money. Unfortunately, we've got the monocletards buying from the store, so it's gonna be here to stay. This was a nice example of the community griefing itself (assuming nobody wants the MT store).
|
HeIIfire11
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 18:59:00 -
[173]
@ AkJon Ferguson..
+1
And that in pretty much anything you say.
|
Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 19:40:00 -
[174]
Quote: 8. CSM willing to be bought off for a few drinks.
If you could provide a copy of EvE's business plan for the next 12 months why the **** didn't you do it while all this stuff was going on?
My guess is you can't, which means you are full of ****.
I never thought I would see someone make a post so misinformed that it had me defending the CSM. . Adapt and overcome or become a monkey on an evolution poster.
|
Maeve Trinity
Adhocracy Incorporated
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 19:46:00 -
[175]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
9. Large portion of the playerbase (including Mynxee! ) willing to be bought off with a few almost-meaningless words.
How did Mynxee get dragged into this when she isn't even playing anymore?
|
Nak hak
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 20:02:00 -
[176]
Edited by: Nak hak on 05/07/2011 20:05:06
Originally by: Avid Bumhumper Protest didn't fail, CCP did.
+1
CCP is the one that will fail, or succeed by their own decisions. Their customers only get one vote in the matter.
Best Regards. Nak hak, The Self-Righteous |
Alayla Nightfall
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 20:05:00 -
[177]
White Tree, I don't think any of us really care what you had to go through.
All we care about is results (or lack there of at this point).
The game is broken fix it.
|
RougeOperator
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 20:17:00 -
[178]
Edited by: RougeOperator on 05/07/2011 20:17:46 If you are not posting with your main you are a coward. least i can respect the monocle goons for the fact they are using their mains to troll.
|
Majuan Shuo
Gallente Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 20:20:00 -
[179]
Originally by: stoicfaux
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Did I miss any?
What's your definition of failure? What goals should have been met for the protests to be considered a success?
Even then, your top ten list comes across as just random crud from someone with a tenuous grasp on reality. Dev alts? Seriously? Were they also posting from black NWO computers via secret routers transmitting on dark fiber? Also, Glenn Beck called and wants to remind you that he will be on GBTV in the future.
He may be making a reference to the probable dev alt post that had "we at ccp" instead of "the people at ccp" or something like that...it was one post and i personally don't find it that big of a deal - even if i did how would you fight that unless they CONSTANTLY slipped up like that (assuming there is a "they" and not a rogue CCP employee) "All your monies AUR belong to us." -- CCP |
Tautut
The Union Of The Snake
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 20:20:00 -
[180]
Originally by: Alayla Nightfall White Tree, I don't think any of us I really care what you had to go through.
All we I care about is results (or lack there of at this point).
The game is broken fix it.
Look - I've fixed your post. You can pay me in ISK or AUR - I'm not fussy.
The Union of the Snake [SNAKE]
|
|
Alayla Nightfall
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 20:21:00 -
[181]
Originally by: RougeOperator Edited by: RougeOperator on 05/07/2011 20:17:46 If you are not posting with your main you are a coward. least i can respect the monocle goons for the fact they are using their mains to troll.
I reserve the right to post with whatever the hell character I want. Doesn't matter, I pay for it.
|
ZyferDK
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 20:26:00 -
[182]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Kudos to CCP for defeating the uprising and retaining the right to break your game and wreck your company's financial future. Well played, CCP.
Here are 10 reasons (in no particular order) I think we lost:
1. Lack of a coherent message by the protesters.
2. Lack of buy-in from the leadership of any large alliance or any truly charismatic/well-spoken individual capable of getting GDI buy-in (to consolidate messaging/actions.)
3. Staggered subscription expiry.
4. Skill queues and POS fuel.
5. Prisoner's dilemma. (free riders)
6. EVE's ingrained culture of trolls and fanbois (plus the ability to post anonymously.)
7. The lack of alternative engaging sandbox games.
8. CSM willing to be bought off for a few drinks.
9. Large portion of the playerbase (including Mynxee! ) willing to be bought off with a few almost-meaningless words.
10. CCP stall tactics and counterintelligence/war propaganda (via dev alts)
Did I miss any?
didnt fail u idiot
|
RougeOperator
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 20:28:00 -
[183]
Originally by: Alayla Nightfall
Originally by: RougeOperator Edited by: RougeOperator on 05/07/2011 20:17:46 If you are not posting with your main you are a coward. least i can respect the monocle goons for the fact they are using their mains to troll.
I reserve the right to post with whatever the hell character I want. Doesn't matter, I pay for it.
NO you just don't have the fortitude to actually put yourself out there with any meaning. You are a coward.
It had nothing to do with how you being a paying anything. Not shocked and alt poster would miss the point.
|
Alayla Nightfall
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 20:39:00 -
[184]
Originally by: RougeOperator
Originally by: Alayla Nightfall
Originally by: RougeOperator Edited by: RougeOperator on 05/07/2011 20:17:46 If you are not posting with your main you are a coward. least i can respect the monocle goons for the fact they are using their mains to troll.
I reserve the right to post with whatever the hell character I want. Doesn't matter, I pay for it.
NO you just don't have the fortitude to actually put yourself out there with any meaning. You are a coward.
It had nothing to do with how you being a paying anything. Not shocked and alt poster would miss the point.
Miss your point you mean? Maybe you missed mine, doens't matter regardless who I am, or who I'm with, as a paying customer, I have as much fortitude as you do.
|
K'iran
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 20:45:00 -
[185]
Originally by: Cutter Isaacson The only joke I see are the people whining at the CSM members. You guys voted for them, or didn't (in which case you have no right to complain) then when they drop everything in real life at a moments notice to fly out to Iceland to deal with this almighty mess AND come away with exactly the answers we were looking for, you sit here and scream at them.
Perhaps you aren't aware of how the summits usually work (it's the only explanation I can come up with for the stupidity in here) where the CSM are given set dates, well ahead of time, as to when they will be needed. The CSM can then plan ahead and make sure that there is nothing conflicting with those dates and everything goes smoothly.
This time round they had a weeks notice, at most, to get their arses to Iceland. They went because that is their job, yes, but this was the equivalent of getting a phone call at 3am on your day off telling you that you HAVE to come to work. And you wonder why some of the CSM members are ****ed off? With you and with CCP.
You people need to think before you post, you make the rest of us look bad.
I have to quote this.
|
Alayla Nightfall
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 21:05:00 -
[186]
Originally by: K'iran
Originally by: Cutter Isaacson The only joke I see are the people whining at the CSM members. You guys voted for them, or didn't (in which case you have no right to complain) then when they drop everything in real life at a moments notice to fly out to Iceland to deal with this almighty mess AND come away with exactly the answers we were looking for, you sit here and scream at them.
Perhaps you aren't aware of how the summits usually work (it's the only explanation I can come up with for the stupidity in here) where the CSM are given set dates, well ahead of time, as to when they will be needed. The CSM can then plan ahead and make sure that there is nothing conflicting with those dates and everything goes smoothly.
This time round they had a weeks notice, at most, to get their arses to Iceland. They went because that is their job, yes, but this was the equivalent of getting a phone call at 3am on your day off telling you that you HAVE to come to work. And you wonder why some of the CSM members are ****ed off? With you and with CCP.
You people need to think before you post, you make the rest of us look bad.
I have to quote this.
I'm not sure how the joke is on the customer (or the people) complaining honestly. CSM members put themselves in that position don't they? They should know what comes with the job description.
|
RougeOperator
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 21:13:00 -
[187]
Originally by: Alayla Nightfall
Originally by: RougeOperator
Originally by: Alayla Nightfall
Originally by: RougeOperator Edited by: RougeOperator on 05/07/2011 20:17:46 If you are not posting with your main you are a coward. least i can respect the monocle goons for the fact they are using their mains to troll.
I reserve the right to post with whatever the hell character I want. Doesn't matter, I pay for it.
NO you just don't have the fortitude to actually put yourself out there with any meaning. You are a coward.
It had nothing to do with how you being a paying anything. Not shocked and alt poster would miss the point.
Miss your point you mean? Maybe you missed mine, doens't matter regardless who I am, or who I'm with, as a paying customer, I have as much fortitude as you do.
Post with your main then talk to me loser.
|
K'iran
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 21:13:00 -
[188]
Edited by: K''iran on 05/07/2011 21:16:15
Originally by: Alayla Nightfall I'm not sure how the joke is on the customer (or the people) complaining honestly. CSM members put themselves in that position don't they? They should know what comes with the job description.
Being flown in with just a few day's notice to clear up a humongous mess is unprecedented for the CSM. Per that quote; normally those trips are planned well in advance so you have the time to clear your schedule, plan so you can take days off from work and all that. This time there wasn't so no; it doesn't come with the job description.
Only people who have no real commitments in life can simply take a few days off during the week. Normal people have to arrange for replacement at work, perhaps baby sitters, how about a job interview, your pet needs feeding and who'll let the dog out, perhaps had a funeral/wedding planned or were ill, perhaps had to go to hospital or whatever. Only idiots think you can just pack up and leave for a bit without issue on short notice.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 21:45:00 -
[189]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Kudos to CCP for defeating the uprising and retaining the right to break your game and wreck your company's financial future. Well played, CCP.
Here are 10 reasons (in no particular order) I think we lost:
1. Lack of a coherent message by the protesters.
2. Lack of buy-in from the leadership of any large alliance or any truly charismatic/well-spoken individual capable of getting GDI buy-in (to consolidate messaging/actions.)
3. Staggered subscription expiry.
4. Skill queues and POS fuel.
5. Prisoner's dilemma. (free riders)
6. EVE's ingrained culture of trolls and fanbois (plus the ability to post anonymously.)
7. The lack of alternative engaging sandbox games.
8. CSM willing to be bought off for a few drinks.
9. Large portion of the playerbase (including Mynxee! ) willing to be bought off with a few almost-meaningless words.
10. CCP stall tactics and counterintelligence/war propaganda (via dev alts)
Did I miss any?
|
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Legion RONA Directorate
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 21:49:00 -
[190]
Originally by: San Severina
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Kudos to CCP for defeating the uprising and retaining the right to break your game and wreck your company's financial future. Well played, CCP.
Here are 10 reasons (in no particular order) I think we lost:
1. Lack of a coherent message by the protesters.
2. Lack of buy-in from the leadership of any large alliance or any truly charismatic/well-spoken individual capable of getting GDI buy-in (to consolidate messaging/actions.)
3. Staggered subscription expiry.
4. Skill queues and POS fuel.
5. Prisoner's dilemma. (free riders)
6. EVE's ingrained culture of trolls and fanbois (plus the ability to post anonymously.)
7. The lack of alternative engaging sandbox games.
8. CSM willing to be bought off for a few drinks.
9. Large portion of the playerbase (including Mynxee! ) willing to be bought off with a few almost-meaningless words.
10. CCP stall tactics and counterintelligence/war propaganda (via dev alts)
Did I miss any?
San either you are trolling, you sold your character, or you have become an idiot. You are smarter than this, I should know years of talking to you an matari chat have proven it.
|
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 21:56:00 -
[191]
Originally by: Obsidian Hawk
Originally by: San Severina
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Kudos to CCP for defeating the uprising and retaining the right to break your game and wreck your company's financial future. Well played, CCP.
Here are 10 reasons (in no particular order) I think we lost:
1. Lack of a coherent message by the protesters.
2. Lack of buy-in from the leadership of any large alliance or any truly charismatic/well-spoken individual capable of getting GDI buy-in (to consolidate messaging/actions.)
3. Staggered subscription expiry.
4. Skill queues and POS fuel.
5. Prisoner's dilemma. (free riders)
6. EVE's ingrained culture of trolls and fanbois (plus the ability to post anonymously.)
7. The lack of alternative engaging sandbox games.
8. CSM willing to be bought off for a few drinks.
9. Large portion of the playerbase (including Mynxee! ) willing to be bought off with a few almost-meaningless words.
10. CCP stall tactics and counterintelligence/war propaganda (via dev alts)
Did I miss any?
San either you are trolling, you sold your character, or you have become an idiot. You are smarter than this, I should know years of talking to you an matari chat have proven it.
Smarter than what Hawky? I just quoted AkJon to give him a bump, I agree 100% with everything he has said to date & yes I'm not giving CCP another cent as long as I live & no I'm not selling my toons. Thanks for the bump too Hawky
|
Ozmodan
Minmatar Massively Mob
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 22:00:00 -
[192]
Edited by: Ozmodan on 05/07/2011 22:01:15 You don't need a silly top ten list with idiotic items when there is only one reason the protest failed. It did not make any sense, just a small group of whiners complaining about nothing.
If and ever CCP introduces non fluff items in the shop, then you have a basis for whining, at present all I see is a lot of hot air with no basis in fact. Learners permit still current |
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 22:07:00 -
[193]
Originally by: Ozmodan Edited by: Ozmodan on 05/07/2011 22:01:15 You don't need a silly top ten list with idiotic items when there is only one reason the protest failed. It did not make any sense, just a small group of whiners complaining about nothing.
If and ever CCP introduces non fluff items in the shop, then you have a basis for whining, at present all I see is a lot of hot air with no basis in fact.
Surprise surprise, another insulting troll.
Some of us dont like CQ, we wanted it to be optional & the old hangar to remain, would have cost CCP nothing. Some of us dont want to pay real $ to dress the dolly & cyber & stuff, we want to play internet spaceships.
I'm not saying people who wanted WiS shouldn't have it, just that 100% of the paying community shouldn't be forced to use it.
Some of us find the whole concept of MT in this game beyond PLEX offensive. Is that so hard to understand?
TeaDaze says it better than I ever could.
TeaDaze
|
Le Sabre
Gallente Apparently Miners
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 22:14:00 -
[194]
Originally by: Ozmodan
You don't need a silly top ten list with idiotic items when there is only one reason the protest failed. It did not make any sense, just a small group of whiners complaining about nothing.
Confirming it only takes a small amount of people to lock down the trade hubs, even the one that's on its own node.
Originally by: Ozmodan
If and ever CCP introduces non fluff items in the shop, then you have a basis for whining, at present all I see is a lot of hot air with no basis in fact.
Yes, lets wait for non fluff to get a foothold in game before we decide its a bad idea shall we?
Proud participant in the great "Trade hub lock down" of 24th june 2011. We control OUR game CCP!!! |
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 22:33:00 -
[195]
I guess I'll be using this account on forums for the next 2 weeks. San, you have mail.
Anyhoo ...
To those who are saying that the protest was all/only about non-vanity MT (other than PLEX) and that that issue has been resolved I'd say this:
We didn't get a definitive 'no non-vanity MTs (other than PLEX) ever' we got 'no non-vanity MTs in our vanity items store unless/until we change plans'. So I disagree with your contention that the issue was addressed adequately.
Also, the statement we got was (apparently) identical to a statement that had been sent up the flagpole and sent to CSM before the summit even occurred. So CSM had no effect.
But even if you believe it was addressed adequately, and even if you don't care that the CSM had no effect, I think you're missing the point:
The point is that P2W MT (other than PLEX) was the LAST STRAW. It wasn't the only problem with EVE/CCP, far from it. All the other problems I've already listed had people dropping subs, getting discouraged, ****ing people off, etc. This one was the LAST STRAW.
When a straw breaks the camel's back, when the playerbase finally says "ENOUGH!," it is laughable to suggest that CCP's reaction of 'Oh, was that straw too much? Here, let me take that straw back and let's sing kumbaya' is sufficient.
(I don't know how many more posts I'm going to be allowed to make here, but anyway, if I disappear altogether, cheers.)
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 23:40:00 -
[196]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson I guess I'll be using this account on forums for the next 2 weeks. San, you have mail.
Anyhoo ...
To those who are saying that the protest was all/only about non-vanity MT (other than PLEX) and that that issue has been resolved I'd say this:
We didn't get a definitive 'no non-vanity MTs (other than PLEX) ever' we got 'no non-vanity MTs in our vanity items store unless/until we change plans'. So I disagree with your contention that the issue was addressed adequately.
Also, the statement we got was (apparently) identical to a statement that had been sent up the flagpole and sent to CSM before the summit even occurred. So CSM had no effect.
But even if you believe it was addressed adequately, and even if you don't care that the CSM had no effect, I think you're missing the point:
The point is that P2W MT (other than PLEX) was the LAST STRAW. It wasn't the only problem with EVE/CCP, far from it. All the other problems I've already listed had people dropping subs, getting discouraged, ****ing people off, etc. This one was the LAST STRAW.
When a straw breaks the camel's back, when the playerbase finally says "ENOUGH!," it is laughable to suggest that CCP's reaction of 'Oh, was that straw too much? Here, let me take that straw back and let's sing kumbaya' is sufficient.
(I don't know how many more posts I'm going to be allowed to make here, but anyway, if I disappear altogether, cheers.)
+1
CCP continues to silence active critics - who are constructive, thoughtful, well informed & not abusive. Is this how they gauge player feedback? Oh that's right, they don't care what we say only what we do now! They certainly are not interested in any criticism - obviously.
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 00:10:00 -
[197]
Originally by: San Severina
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson I guess I'll be using this account on forums for the next 2 weeks. San, you have mail.
Anyhoo ...
To those who are saying that the protest was all/only about non-vanity MT (other than PLEX) and that that issue has been resolved I'd say this:
We didn't get a definitive 'no non-vanity MTs (other than PLEX) ever' we got 'no non-vanity MTs in our vanity items store unless/until we change plans'. So I disagree with your contention that the issue was addressed adequately.
Also, the statement we got was (apparently) identical to a statement that had been sent up the flagpole and sent to CSM before the summit even occurred. So CSM had no effect.
But even if you believe it was addressed adequately, and even if you don't care that the CSM had no effect, I think you're missing the point:
The point is that P2W MT (other than PLEX) was the LAST STRAW. It wasn't the only problem with EVE/CCP, far from it. All the other problems I've already listed had people dropping subs, getting discouraged, ****ing people off, etc. This one was the LAST STRAW.
When a straw breaks the camel's back, when the playerbase finally says "ENOUGH!," it is laughable to suggest that CCP's reaction of 'Oh, was that straw too much? Here, let me take that straw back and let's sing kumbaya' is sufficient.
(I don't know how many more posts I'm going to be allowed to make here, but anyway, if I disappear altogether, cheers.)
+1
CCP continues to silence active critics - who are constructive, thoughtful, well informed & not abusive. Is this how they gauge player feedback? Oh that's right, they don't care what we say only what we do now! They certainly are not interested in any criticism - obviously.
You really are wasting your time now. Why? Because you're not listening to the other side of the argument and they're not listening to you.
Pretty much everything has been said, you can argue until you're blue in the face but it really will not make any difference what-so-ever.
Name one that was silenced that actually measures up to the way you describe them.
Player feed-back is useful, but when it's the same old thing trying to brain wash the otherside into thinking the way you do, then it is far from useful.
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 00:25:00 -
[198]
Edited by: Jonathan Ferguson on 06/07/2011 00:25:45
Originally by: Tanya Fox Name one that was silenced that actually measures up to the way you describe them.
I'm your Huckleberry.
Constructive. Check.
Thoughtful. Check
Well-informed. Check
Not abusive. Check (okay, push me hard enough and long enough and eventually I can lose my cool, but much less so than either CCP (Zulu's dishonest and impetuous blog he later apologized for) or Mittens ("kill yourself irl" - scroll down to July 3, it's a recurring theme) or any of the other parties to this situation.)
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 00:26:00 -
[199]
Originally by: RougeOperator
Originally by: Alayla Nightfall
Originally by: RougeOperator Edited by: RougeOperator on 05/07/2011 20:17:46 If you are not posting with your main you are a coward. least i can respect the monocle goons for the fact they are using their mains to troll.
I reserve the right to post with whatever the hell character I want. Doesn't matter, I pay for it.
NO you just don't have the fortitude to actually put yourself out there with any meaning. You are a coward.
It had nothing to do with how you being a paying anything. Not shocked and alt poster would miss the point.
People can use whatever character they like to post with on the forums.
Some people use alts for posting because they believe what happens on the forums should stay on the forums. A lot of petty arguments can find their way into games that start on the forums, that's not why people play games (at least most people). So it's only common sense not to use a main character.
So quit with the macho bull**** already, that's the kind of argument kids put forward.
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 00:28:00 -
[200]
Speaking of mittens, the fountain of wisdom is back at it, mere minutes ago:
"I represent those who voted for me, not 'everyone'. Don't give me your entitled voter schtick, you're late to this party."
|
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 00:31:00 -
[201]
Originally by: Tanya Fox People can use whatever character they like to post with on the forums.
Some people use alts for posting because they believe what happens on the forums should stay on the forums. A lot of petty arguments can find their way into games that start on the forums, that's not why people play games (at least most people). So it's only common sense not to use a main character.
So quit with the macho bull**** already, that's the kind of argument kids put forward.
C'mon dude, be reasonable. EVE is famous for trolls/trolling. Nothing derails a thread quicker than a room full of trolls. This issue is important. In order to keep the conversation from being derailed, asking people to please post with their mains or to face extreme suspicion if they don't is completely reasonable. I don't see how you can argue otherwise with a straight face.
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 00:36:00 -
[202]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson
Originally by: Tanya Fox People can use whatever character they like to post with on the forums.
Some people use alts for posting because they believe what happens on the forums should stay on the forums. A lot of petty arguments can find their way into games that start on the forums, that's not why people play games (at least most people). So it's only common sense not to use a main character.
So quit with the macho bull**** already, that's the kind of argument kids put forward.
C'mon dude, be reasonable. EVE is famous for trolls/trolling. Nothing derails a thread quicker than a room full of trolls. This issue is important. In order to keep the conversation from being derailed, asking people to please post with their mains or to face extreme suspicion if they don't is completely reasonable. I don't see how you can argue otherwise with a straight face.
All forums have trolls, it seems to be a sport for them. Even a lot of sensible posters can troll on occassions.
You don't need to know the main of the poster, you should be able to tell from the post if it has merit or not.
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 00:38:00 -
[203]
Originally by: Tanya Fox You really are wasting your time now. Why? Because you're not listening to the other side of the argument and they're not listening to you.
There's no question that they're not listening to me. Hilmar said as much (words vs actions, I'm sure you've read it, holler if you haven't and I'll try to find the link for you.)
I'd be happy to listen to anyone who posts anything constructive from the other side. All I'm hearing are ad hominems and half-truths (at best).
Tanya, which opposing claim do you think I've ignored that you think is valid? I will address it in my next post.
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 00:48:00 -
[204]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson I guess I'll be using this account on forums for the next 2 weeks. San, you have mail.
Anyhoo ...
To those who are saying that the protest was all/only about non-vanity MT (other than PLEX) and that that issue has been resolved I'd say this:
We didn't get a definitive 'no non-vanity MTs (other than PLEX) ever' we got 'no non-vanity MTs in our vanity items store unless/until we change plans'. So I disagree with your contention that the issue was addressed adequately.
Also, the statement we got was (apparently) identical to a statement that had been sent up the flagpole and sent to CSM before the summit even occurred. So CSM had no effect.
But even if you believe it was addressed adequately, and even if you don't care that the CSM had no effect, I think you're missing the point:
The point is that P2W MT (other than PLEX) was the LAST STRAW. It wasn't the only problem with EVE/CCP, far from it. All the other problems I've already listed had people dropping subs, getting discouraged, ****ing people off, etc. This one was the LAST STRAW.
When a straw breaks the camel's back, when the playerbase finally says "ENOUGH!," it is laughable to suggest that CCP's reaction of 'Oh, was that straw too much? Here, let me take that straw back and let's sing kumbaya' is sufficient.
(I don't know how many more posts I'm going to be allowed to make here, but anyway, if I disappear altogether, cheers.)
Ok, so basically this is your thread and another account of yours got banned from the forums for 2 weeks. Which is why you are no longer posting on this thread with AkJon Ferguson.
So why did they ban AkJon? Just out of interest!
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:01:00 -
[205]
I can't discuss blah blah blah.
But I can direct you to my (sort of) new Twitter page!
|
Important Person
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:12:00 -
[206]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson I can't discuss blah blah blah.
But I can direct you to my (sort of) new Twitter page!
You're mad enough to make a twitter account. Glorious.
And just for your information your opinions are all wrong. |
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:15:00 -
[207]
Originally by: Important Person
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson I can't discuss blah blah blah.
But I can direct you to my (sort of) new Twitter page!
You're mad enough to make a twitter account. Glorious.
And just for your information your opinions are all wrong.
Does somebody need a hug? C'mere you!
(BTW, not a new twitter page. Just very much disused because social media sucks imo.)
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:18:00 -
[208]
Originally by: Tanya Fox
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson I guess I'll be using this account on forums for the next 2 weeks. San, you have mail.
Anyhoo ...
To those who are saying that the protest was all/only about non-vanity MT (other than PLEX) and that that issue has been resolved I'd say this:
We didn't get a definitive 'no non-vanity MTs (other than PLEX) ever' we got 'no non-vanity MTs in our vanity items store unless/until we change plans'. So I disagree with your contention that the issue was addressed adequately.
Also, the statement we got was (apparently) identical to a statement that had been sent up the flagpole and sent to CSM before the summit even occurred. So CSM had no effect.
But even if you believe it was addressed adequately, and even if you don't care that the CSM had no effect, I think you're missing the point:
The point is that P2W MT (other than PLEX) was the LAST STRAW. It wasn't the only problem with EVE/CCP, far from it. All the other problems I've already listed had people dropping subs, getting discouraged, ****ing people off, etc. This one was the LAST STRAW.
When a straw breaks the camel's back, when the playerbase finally says "ENOUGH!," it is laughable to suggest that CCP's reaction of 'Oh, was that straw too much? Here, let me take that straw back and let's sing kumbaya' is sufficient.
(I don't know how many more posts I'm going to be allowed to make here, but anyway, if I disappear altogether, cheers.)
Ok, so basically this is your thread and another account of yours got banned from the forums for 2 weeks. Which is why you are no longer posting on this thread with AkJon Ferguson.
So why did they ban AkJon? Just out of interest!
Why do you think?
I mean seriously & in all honesty, why do you think a character that has refused to yield to enormous trolling & abuse (none of it making much sense or based in fact), against continued reasonable, informed & valid arguments has been banned?
Looks pretty obvious to me.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:24:00 -
[209]
Originally by: Important Person
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson I can't discuss blah blah blah.
But I can direct you to my (sort of) new Twitter page!
You're mad enough to make a twitter account. Glorious.
And just for your information your opinions are all wrong.
lol- again, informed, reasonable arguments & concerns that effect all players are shot down by the incredibly sophisticated trolling ALT of dubious origins stating "your opinions are all wrong".
Please, you are not dealing with naughty children here, nut up & come up with some rational, informed arguments based in fact of GTFO, you are just a pathetic troll.
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:24:00 -
[210]
Edited by: Tanya Fox on 06/07/2011 01:24:43
Originally by: San Severina
Originally by: Tanya Fox
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson I guess I'll be using this account on forums for the next 2 weeks. San, you have mail.
Anyhoo ...
To those who are saying that the protest was all/only about non-vanity MT (other than PLEX) and that that issue has been resolved I'd say this:
We didn't get a definitive 'no non-vanity MTs (other than PLEX) ever' we got 'no non-vanity MTs in our vanity items store unless/until we change plans'. So I disagree with your contention that the issue was addressed adequately.
Also, the statement we got was (apparently) identical to a statement that had been sent up the flagpole and sent to CSM before the summit even occurred. So CSM had no effect.
But even if you believe it was addressed adequately, and even if you don't care that the CSM had no effect, I think you're missing the point:
The point is that P2W MT (other than PLEX) was the LAST STRAW. It wasn't the only problem with EVE/CCP, far from it. All the other problems I've already listed had people dropping subs, getting discouraged, ****ing people off, etc. This one was the LAST STRAW.
When a straw breaks the camel's back, when the playerbase finally says "ENOUGH!," it is laughable to suggest that CCP's reaction of 'Oh, was that straw too much? Here, let me take that straw back and let's sing kumbaya' is sufficient.
(I don't know how many more posts I'm going to be allowed to make here, but anyway, if I disappear altogether, cheers.)
Ok, so basically this is your thread and another account of yours got banned from the forums for 2 weeks. Which is why you are no longer posting on this thread with AkJon Ferguson.
So why did they ban AkJon? Just out of interest!
Why do you think?
I mean seriously & in all honesty, why do you think a character that has refused to yield to enormous trolling & abuse (none of it making much sense or based in fact), against continued reasonable, informed & valid arguments has been banned?
Looks pretty obvious to me.
Seriously? I find most of your posts if not all in this thread unconvincing.
You portray yourself as some devoted follower to the OP and hence lose any real credibility.
|
|
Important Person
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:25:00 -
[211]
Originally by: San Severina
Why do you think?
I mean seriously & in all honesty, why do you think a character that has refused to yield to enormous trolling & abuse (none of it making much sense or based in fact), against continued reasonable, informed & valid arguments has been banned?
Looks pretty obvious to me.
AkJon isn't really banned. It's all just a pathetic publicity stunt. Move along, nothing to see here.
|
Olvel
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:25:00 -
[212]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson 1. Lack of a coherent message by the protesters. ... 6. EVE's ingrained culture of trolls
Seriously. What was the protest even about? The "chief complaint" seemed to change from one day to the next. And half the folks complaining seemed to be yelling just to hear their own voices.
The "protestors" did a great job of attacking folks that were trying to help them, labeling anyone with a different opinion as a fanboy or a CCP alt, and turning allies into enemies.
I tried to participate in a rational discussion of the flaws of the Incarna update... But after a day of listening to those "protestors" rage indiscriminately - I just wanted them all to shut up and go away so I could go back to enjoying my game.
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:33:00 -
[213]
Originally by: Olvel
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson 1. Lack of a coherent message by the protesters. ... 6. EVE's ingrained culture of trolls
Seriously. What was the protest even about? The "chief complaint" seemed to change from one day to the next. And half the folks complaining seemed to be yelling just to hear their own voices.
The "protestors" did a great job of attacking folks that were trying to help them, labeling anyone with a different opinion as a fanboy or a CCP alt, and turning allies into enemies.
I tried to participate in a rational discussion of the flaws of the Incarna update... But after a day of listening to those "protestors" rage indiscriminately - I just wanted them all to shut up and go away so I could go back to enjoying my game.
Could you give me a rough example of how that discussion might have gone? Because if somebody with honest grievances was turned off by what the protesters did then certainly we can learn from that.
Would you have been willing to unsubscribe (which is the only thing that CCP pays attention to) if you had felt like the protesters had respected your point of view more?
|
Ard UnjiiGo
Meatshield Bastards
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:33:00 -
[214]
Came expecting David Letterman.
Left thinking cynicism is too easy.
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:38:00 -
[215]
Originally by: Ard UnjiiGo Came expecting David Letterman.
Left thinking cynicism is too easy.
I used to love Dave. Then he went all 9/11 bat**** xenophobic for a while. Now I watch him nightly because the old lady likes him, but his heart's not in it anymore. He just mails it in.
Do you consider the protesters more cynical or the fanbois more cynical? At least the protesters still think they might be able to make a difference ...
(BTW, how you liking the meatshields? I know Eloha (I think he quit bastards) and jade (not sure about him.) Hope it's working out for you.)
Want to buy a monocle? |
Mars Theran
Caldari EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:42:00 -
[216]
Originally by: Olvel
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson 1. Lack of a coherent message by the protesters. ... 6. EVE's ingrained culture of trolls
Seriously. What was the protest even about? The "chief complaint" seemed to change from one day to the next. And half the folks complaining seemed to be yelling just to hear their own voices.
The "protestors" did a great job of attacking folks that were trying to help them, labeling anyone with a different opinion as a fanboy or a CCP alt, and turning allies into enemies.
I tried to participate in a rational discussion of the flaws of the Incarna update... But after a day of listening to those "protestors" rage indiscriminately - I just wanted them all to shut up and go away so I could go back to enjoying my game.
I felt much the same way. I attempted to rationalize with them, find out what their chief problems were, and even operated as a mediator of sorts, trying to get them to rage less and clearly and concisely define their problems with Incarna and MT. None of it worked, and I ended up finding that a number of people, (by day 2), actually were rational and had valid points to make about various issues they had with the expansion and changes.
It was hard to pick them out though, with them providing the minority of posts in over 55 pages of threads, some as many as 300 pages long. I did find them though, and even agreed to some extent with their issues. As I said, some had a certain validity. I ended up ignoring the majority of threads and posts by the end of day 2 and was consistently irritated at the state of the forums, to such an extent that the Jita protests actually brought a sense of relief.
Worse, was the blatant disregard for developers and rational players, as well as those who brought forth opinions contrary to the accepted norm amongst the flamers and protesters. If not disregard, then it was references of Dev Alts, trolls, and certain unpleasantries directed at those who were trying to calm the situation down. And then there were the MMO review sites, blatantly trashing CCP and the Dev's based on leaked information that wasn't at the time verified as authentic.
So what if it was!? Out of context it seemed a problem sure, but it wasn't meant to be read outside of CCP or taken out of context in that fashion. Lot of fluff about nothing. And here we are, with people like the OP ranting on days after it's settled to most everyone's satisfaction. Most of the forums have quieted down though.
Just a few malcontents, and this one has been spamming multiple threads in an attempt to gain attention, and maybe set off another riot. Can't say I'm impressed.
Throw away 50 Million dollars worth of development, or make a few adjustments to make the player base happy, for the most part?! I think the answer is obvious, and I'm happy with the way it turned out.
The valid issues were addressed as I see it. Even if they were fluff, (and I think some were), they were addressed. Everyone happy now?
No?!?
Originally by: CCP Abathur Artwork in EVE, as you've noticed, is serious business.
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:48:00 -
[217]
Originally by: Mars Theran I attempted to rationalize with them ...
I think we found your problem right there. If I want rationalization, I'll talk to CCP, they excel at that.
If I want reason, there's only my fellow protesters to talk to.
Want to buy a monocle? |
Pesky LaRue
Brotherhood Of Fallen Angels Etherium Cartel
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:48:00 -
[218]
Edited by: Pesky LaRue on 06/07/2011 01:49:34
Originally by: San Severina Why do you think?
I mean seriously & in all honesty, why do you think a character that has refused to yield to enormous trolling & abuse (none of it making much sense or based in fact), against continued reasonable, informed & valid arguments has been banned?
Looks pretty obvious to me.
for, as he himself has said in this very thread, posting links to a particularly off-colour adult website (which was very informative, don't get me wrong, but THAT'S what he got himself banned for).
Yup, that's your folk-hero, right there.
You certainly don't come off like a bitter, paranoid, delusional, stalker fan-boy. .
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 01:54:00 -
[219]
Edited by: Jonathan Ferguson on 06/07/2011 01:56:45
Originally by: Pesky LaRue Edited by: Pesky LaRue on 06/07/2011 01:49:34
Originally by: San Severina Why do you think?
I mean seriously & in all honesty, why do you think a character that has refused to yield to enormous trolling & abuse (none of it making much sense or based in fact), against continued reasonable, informed & valid arguments has been banned?
Looks pretty obvious to me.
for, as he himself has said in this very thread, posting links to a particularly off-colour adult website (which was very informative, don't get me wrong, but THAT'S what he got himself banned for).
Yup, that's your folk-hero, right there.
You certainly don't come off like a bitter, paranoid, delusional, stalker fan-boy.
Did you miss the part where he said "seriously and in all honesty"?
Posting a link to the top google hit of a word that isn't even blocked by the profanity filter here is hardly posting a link to an 'off-colour adult website'. Stop lying FFS, is that all you people can do?
Want to buy a monocle? |
HeIIfire11
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 02:01:00 -
[220]
Edited by: HeIIfire11 on 06/07/2011 02:01:57
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson I can't discuss blah blah blah.
But I can direct you to my (sort of) new Twitter page!
Wow..what a little ***** lol. That's who you guys voted for csm?
That little **** sucker is so full of himsealf it almost hurts.
How long do these "hours for plex" go anyway? It's been a lot longer than 4 hours. Make it stop so I'm not tempted to read anymore
|
|
Pesky LaRue
Brotherhood Of Fallen Angels Etherium Cartel
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 02:03:00 -
[221]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson Edited by: Jonathan Ferguson on 06/07/2011 01:56:45
Originally by: Pesky LaRue Edited by: Pesky LaRue on 06/07/2011 01:49:34
Originally by: San Severina Why do you think?
I mean seriously & in all honesty, why do you think a character that has refused to yield to enormous trolling & abuse (none of it making much sense or based in fact), against continued reasonable, informed & valid arguments has been banned?
Looks pretty obvious to me.
for, as he himself has said in this very thread, posting links to a particularly off-colour adult website (which was very informative, don't get me wrong, but THAT'S what he got himself banned for).
Yup, that's your folk-hero, right there.
You certainly don't come off like a bitter, paranoid, delusional, stalker fan-boy.
Did you miss the part where he said "seriously and in all honesty"?
Posting a link to the top google hit of a word that isn't even blocked by the profanity filter here is hardly posting a link to an 'off-colour adult website'. Stop lying FFS, is that all you people can do?
Not a lie in the least. The website you posted to (according to the twitter page you also linked here) took you to a page that was absolutely NOT safe for work, wasn't family friendly, and abo****ely didn't belong on a gaming website.
Again - I feel the need to point out as I did in my original post that it was very informative and I make no moral judgement on the content of the website, but it absolutely wasn't fit for a gaming website, even one with an M-rating.
And, I read the part you mentioned, but if you feel that was a disclaimer of some sorts, you're evidently too smitten with that particular troll and believe we can all see how wonderful he is and read meanings into his every word.
Anyway, enjoy your civil rights movement, it's awesome to see the groundswell of support you got. .
|
Olvel
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 02:03:00 -
[222]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson Could you give me a rough example of how that discussion might have gone? Because if somebody with honest grievances was turned off by what the protesters did then certainly we can learn from that.
For the first day or two I was genuinely curious to see what people were saying. There was a lot of emotion, but I wasn't seeing anything all that broken.
I had a couple discussions with people about Aurum and CQ. I didn't think either of those was gamebreaking... But I could at least understand what people were complaining about. I could understand the concerns about not being able to run multiple clients, or any client at all on older hardware. I could understand the pay-to-win concerns.
But by the time Friday rolled around, I was just plain sick of hearing it. Folks acted like they were completely unable to access their cargohold, when it simply took a couple more clicks. Folks raged about their computers melting under the strain of Incarna. And then the idiots started spinning off all those wardec threads and crap like that.
I was trying to see if CCP had any kind of response to the complaints, and the forums were basically unusable. Whenever anyone at CCP did post a response it was quickly buried under pages of complaints. The same complaints and hyperbole that'd already been voiced dozens of times before.
It stopped being communication, and started being noise.
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson Would you have been willing to unsubscribe (which is the only thing that CCP pays attention to) if you had felt like the protesters had respected your point of view more?
I was not willing to unsubscribe, personally, as I didn't see any of the changes as dealbreakers.
I might have been convinced to unsubscribe in some kind of show of solidarity... But by Friday afternoon I was just sick of all the noise and wanted to go back to enjoying my game. Tonight is the first time I've been back to the forums since that weekend.
I think it would have been far more effective if, rather than rage on the forums, folks had actually just straight-up unsubscribed in protest. Logged out of the game and just not come back. That would have actually sent a message that players were not willing to accept these deal-breaking changes.
Instead, the message that was sent was "We'll whine and complain and bring your forums to their knees... And keep paying and playing." Which is exactly the wrong message to send if you ever want CCP to listen to what you have to say.
|
Mars Theran
Caldari EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 02:04:00 -
[223]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson
Originally by: Mars Theran I attempted to rationalize with them ...
I think we found your problem right there. If I want rationalization, I'll talk to CCP, they excel at that.
If I want reason, there's only my fellow protesters to talk to.
Originally by: Wikipedia In epistemology and in its modern sense, rationalism is "any view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification" (Lacey 286). In more technical terms, it is a method or a theory "in which the criterion of the truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive"
That would be the other rationalism., applied to people like you, which apparently doesn't work. Just wiki-away there though.
Originally by: CCP Abathur Artwork in EVE, as you've noticed, is serious business.
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 02:07:00 -
[224]
Originally by: Olvel
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson Could you give me a rough example of how that discussion might have gone? Because if somebody with honest grievances was turned off by what the protesters did then certainly we can learn from that.
For the first day or two I was genuinely curious to see what people were saying. There was a lot of emotion, but I wasn't seeing anything all that broken.
I had a couple discussions with people about Aurum and CQ. I didn't think either of those was gamebreaking... But I could at least understand what people were complaining about. I could understand the concerns about not being able to run multiple clients, or any client at all on older hardware. I could understand the pay-to-win concerns.
But by the time Friday rolled around, I was just plain sick of hearing it. Folks acted like they were completely unable to access their cargohold, when it simply took a couple more clicks. Folks raged about their computers melting under the strain of Incarna. And then the idiots started spinning off all those wardec threads and crap like that.
I was trying to see if CCP had any kind of response to the complaints, and the forums were basically unusable. Whenever anyone at CCP did post a response it was quickly buried under pages of complaints. The same complaints and hyperbole that'd already been voiced dozens of times before.
It stopped being communication, and started being noise.
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson Would you have been willing to unsubscribe (which is the only thing that CCP pays attention to) if you had felt like the protesters had respected your point of view more?
I was not willing to unsubscribe, personally, as I didn't see any of the changes as dealbreakers.
I might have been convinced to unsubscribe in some kind of show of solidarity... But by Friday afternoon I was just sick of all the noise and wanted to go back to enjoying my game. Tonight is the first time I've been back to the forums since that weekend.
I think it would have been far more effective if, rather than rage on the forums, folks had actually just straight-up unsubscribed in protest. Logged out of the game and just not come back. That would have actually sent a message that players were not willing to accept these deal-breaking changes.
Instead, the message that was sent was "We'll whine and complain and bring your forums to their knees... And keep paying and playing." Which is exactly the wrong message to send if you ever want CCP to listen to what you have to say.
I hear what you're saying and I can understand why you were turned off. I don't think it's easy to just walk away from something after 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 years without saying SOMETHING on your way out the door, though. Not everyone has Teadaze's style.
Anyway, I'm glad you can relate to some of the complaints and I hope you recognize that sometimes you have to be willing to stand up for someone whose complaints are valid even though they don't affect you personally, in the hopes that when you have valid complaints that don't affect somebody else, that they'll stand up for you.
Want to buy a monocle? |
Khamelean
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 02:19:00 -
[225]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson
Originally by: Tanya Fox You really are wasting your time now. Why? Because you're not listening to the other side of the argument and they're not listening to you.
There's no question that they're not listening to me. Hilmar said as much (words vs actions, I'm sure you've read it, holler if you haven't and I'll try to find the link for you.)
I'd be happy to listen to anyone who posts anything constructive from the other side. All I'm hearing are ad hominems and half-truths (at best).
Tanya, which opposing claim do you think I've ignored that you think is valid? I will address it in my next post.
I'll take you at your word that your interested in constructive points from the other side, here is one.
You expectation that CCP would ever make the claim that they will "never" implement non-vaity items is unreasonable. No company (or person for that matter) could ever honestly make such a statement. Even if every single member of staff at CCP is 100% against against non-vanity items for MT, there is no way t guarantee what future management might choose to do.
The other problem is that of liabilty. The culture around micro-transactions could very well change, it's not beyond imagination that there would come a point in the future where 99% of the player base WANTS non-vanity items for MT. Not saying it's likely, but its not beyond imagining. Making the concrete statement of "never" would then prevent them from listening to ther customers.
The best any company can do is tell you it's intentions. It is true that intentions can change, as we saw with the "we have no plans for micro transactions" statement. But they weren't brought in out of nowhere. Disuccsions started months ago and the community was well informed of CCP's plans as they changed.
Picking apart thier statements in an effort to look for loopholes that might allow them to do something you dislike in the future is simply futile. When CCP does starting talking about plans you don't like, that's the time to protest.
The "we must protest now before it's too late" mentality is also futile. This is a video game, everything is mutable. There is no change put in that cannot be taken out. Especially the change incites a community response like the one last week. Solid plans would cause much more of an uproar than lasts week due the to the fact that there were a lot of people who took CCP at there word and ignored the newsletter.
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 02:31:00 -
[226]
Originally by: Khamelean I'll take you at your word that your interested in constructive points from the other side, here is one.
You expectation that CCP would ever make the claim that they will "never" implement non-vanity items is unreasonable. No company (or person for that matter) could ever honestly make such a statement. Even if every single member of staff at CCP is 100% against against non-vanity items for MT, there is no way to guarantee what future management might choose to do.
The other problem is that of liabilty. The culture around micro-transactions could very well change, it's not beyond imagination that there would come a point in the future where 99% of the player base WANTS non-vanity items for MT. Not saying it's likely, but its not beyond imagining. Making the concrete statement of "never" would then prevent them from listening to their customers.
The best any company can do is tell you it's intentions. It is true that intentions can change, as we saw with the "we have no plans for micro transactions" statement. But they weren't brought in out of nowhere. Discussions started months ago and the community was well informed of CCP's plans as they changed.
Picking apart their statements in an effort to look for loopholes that might allow them to do something you dislike in the future is simply futile. When CCP does starting talking about plans you don't like, that's the time to protest.
The "we must protest now before it's too late" mentality is also futile. This is a video game, everything is mutable. There is no change put in that cannot be taken out. Especially the change incites a community response like the one last week. Solid plans would cause much more of an uproar than lasts week due the to the fact that there were a lot of people who took CCP at there word and ignored the newsletter.
I don't agree that a company can't make a permanent commitment to its customers. If a company makes a calculation that the NPV of goodwill generated by making a permanent commitment exceeds the EV of leaving the option open to do what is forbidden by that commitment, then it should make that commitment. I think your argument would have a LOT more weight if CCP had said 'We are not planning and have no plans for any MT for anything other than PLEX and vanity items in the foreseeable future.' If they had said that, then I could see the 'you guys are paranoid argument' carrying a little weight. But their actual statement was (legally) meaningless. And soundwave won't even disavow what he wrote in Fearless. He's working on stuff NOW that is non-vanity MT. Take that to the bank.
As for waiting until 'CCP starts talking about plans' I don't like. Do you really expect CCP to openly talk about anything that might be remotely controversial now? Did you not read Fearless? Did they talk about any of that with us? C'mon now, please be reasonable.
Anyway, thx for the constructive post.
Want to buy a monocle? |
Important Person
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 02:45:00 -
[227]
Edited by: Important Person on 06/07/2011 02:48:19 http://eve-search.com/thread/1546038/page/1
Classy guy oozing style.
http://teadaze.net/GalNet/?p=349
Quote: **** you, Laurentius. DonÆt let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. Learn to spell. Get some class. Buy a clue (or maybe your Good Lord will give you one for free.)
Quote: If you were drunk, fine, have you sobered up yet? If not, then gtfo, youÆre an arrogant little ***** who thinks (ôknowsö) that CCP can (ôwillö) master calculus when theyÆve just managed (after 8 years) to figure out addition and are now struggling miserably with long division.
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 02:56:00 -
[228]
Originally by: Important Person Edited by: Important Person on 06/07/2011 02:48:19 http://eve-search.com/thread/1546038/page/1
Classy guy oozing style.
http://teadaze.net/GalNet/?p=349
Quote: **** you, Laurentius. DonÆt let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. Learn to spell. Get some class. Buy a clue (or maybe your Good Lord will give you one for free.)
Quote: If you were drunk, fine, have you sobered up yet? If not, then gtfo, youÆre an arrogant little ***** who thinks (ôknowsö) that CCP can (ôwillö) master calculus when theyÆve just managed (after 8 years) to figure out addition and are now struggling miserably with long division.
Thanks for the free link. I welcome anybody (particularly folks on the fence) to visit the teadaze link and read the comments. If you have any questions about them, I'd be glad to address them.
As for linking a post to a political website that is the #1 hit on google (even with moderate safesearch on) for a word that is not blocked by the profanity filter here, we've already covered that.
Want to buy a monocle? |
Mars Theran
Caldari EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 03:06:00 -
[229]
Laurentius articulates so well, don't you think? Why don't you try role-playing somebody worth talking too? :(
|
Kogh Ayon
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 03:57:00 -
[230]
The protest failed because even through CCP promised that vanity-items-only, lots people still left the game.
|
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 04:00:00 -
[231]
While we're posting from the comments on Teadaze's GBCW thread from 4 months ago (and change,) here's one that made a strong impression on me at the time:
Feb 9, 2011 Mynxee:"Hey Tea, I understand and support your decision 100%. My interest in EVE is at an all time low too. I just find myself consistently disappointed. Even so, there are plenty of people who are happy with the status quo and whatever CCP decides to deliver.
Difference in perspectives, I guess. As a CSM member, itÆs no fun when the peek behind the curtain that you get as a result reveals that ôthe great and powerful Ozö is a sham. ItÆs concerning to me that there is so little evidenceûboth in recent and planned expansionsûthat EVE designers/visionaries have any plans to grow the game in ways that give PLAYERS more opportunities to persistently impact their environment, to change the universe in ways that affect other players. Instead, the focus seems to be on force-feeding essentially canned experiences to players. The game grows more shallow by the day, I fear. I wonder how this will impact EVEÆs culture over time. Probably not in a way that will re-motivate me to ever again play more than extremely casually."
Of course, Mynxee's position seems to have changed since then:
July 2
Mynxee: "Catching up...good jt. statements from CSM/CCP, presenting a reasonable way fwd. Thanks to both for coming to the table. ... csm6 has definitely risen to the occasion."
I liked old Mynxee better (somebody asked why Mynxee 'got dragged into this' and that's why, fwiw.) YMMV.
Want to buy a monocle? |
Mystical Might
Amarr The Imperial Fedaykin
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 04:16:00 -
[232]
|
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 05:09:00 -
[233]
Originally by: baltec1 It stopped because the bulk of us didnt want none vanity items. CCP has now said the will not go down that road so we are happy again.
Its as simple as that.
They already said this last year too.
Microtransactions? Click here and vote Yes, No or Cosmetic only
|
Bad Messenger
draketrain
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 06:12:00 -
[234]
Only reason why it failed, is the fact that there was no reason to protest at all.
You were protesting against something that never existed, it was all imagination what could exists on future.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 06:36:00 -
[235]
Originally by: Important Person Edited by: Important Person on 06/07/2011 02:48:19 http://eve-search.com/thread/1546038/page/1
Classy guy oozing style.
http://teadaze.net/GalNet/?p=349
Quote: **** you, Laurentius. DonÆt let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. Learn to spell. Get some class. Buy a clue (or maybe your Good Lord will give you one for free.)
Quote: If you were drunk, fine, have you sobered up yet? If not, then gtfo, youÆre an arrogant little ***** who thinks (ôknowsö) that CCP can (ôwillö) master calculus when theyÆve just managed (after 8 years) to figure out addition and are now struggling miserably with long division.
way to crosspost out of context like a true douche & then cast aspersions about class & style.
Those comments were perfectly valid & classy enough considering the obvious lack of class of the person they were directed at, I'd wager that if you could articulate yourself 5% as well you'd say alot worse under the circumstances & you probably wouldn't hide behind your pathetic ALT for the first time in your douche life.
|
Important Person
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 06:39:00 -
[236]
Originally by: San Severina
way to crosspost out of context like a true douche
Why you call me douche? That's not nice. I am person of great import. I expected more from you.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 06:50:00 -
[237]
Originally by: Important Person
Originally by: San Severina
way to crosspost out of context like a true douche
Why you call me douche? That's not nice. I am person of great import. I expected more from you.
a spade is a spade
|
Mara Rinn
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 06:51:00 -
[238]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Here are 10 reasons (in no particular order) I think we lost:
What outcome were you attempting to achieve? What would "winning" have looked like?
[ Australian players join channel ANZAC ] |
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 06:53:00 -
[239]
Originally by: Mara Rinn
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Here are 10 reasons (in no particular order) I think we lost:
What outcome were you attempting to achieve? What would "winning" have looked like?
Top of page 2
Alex Gianturdo does not speak for me: "I represent those who voted for me, not 'everyone'." ~ The Mittani |
Important Person
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 06:57:00 -
[240]
Originally by: San Severina
Originally by: Important Person
Originally by: San Severina
way to crosspost out of context like a true douche
Why you call me douche? That's not nice. I am person of great import. I expected more from you.
a spade is a spade
a shovel is a shovel
|
|
Mara Rinn
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 07:33:00 -
[241]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Hopefully we can agree on those facts. Now here's what winning looks like (from my perspective:)
- CCP commits permanently to making Incarna optional.
- CCP commits permanently to keeping $ for GTC for PLEX the only MT in the game.
- CCP removes Aurum from the game.
- CCP agrees that since we have paid for 2 expansions per year with our inflated monthly subscription, and since this expansion is all about Spaceship Barbies, that they will allow us to play dressup with our Spaceship Barbies for 'free' (since we've already paid for it with our inflated monthly subscription.)
- CCP acknowledges that Hilmar's idea to gouge players because he saw a slideshow on the Internets about gouging players in a F2P game doesn't work in the industry's most expensive subscription-based MMO.
- CCP restores adequate funding to EVE development (Internet Spaceships.)
- CCP regains the respect and trust of its playerbase, and goes on to great financial success from its 2 new games, which can operate on whatever financial model Hilmar dreams up because they are new games with no established precedents/understandings.
See, that list wasn't around before the riots.
I'd agree with you on some of those except your comment about "inflated monthly subscription" in points 4 and 5, your assertion that there is inadequate funding for EVE development, the requirement to scrap Aurum, and your demand that CCP become successful in its two new ventures.
Aurum provides a means to ensure that PLEX are destroyed. As such it means that people buying vanity items are directly contributing to CCP's bottom line, and thus providing more funds for "adequate" funding of EVE development.
I'm not sure how you could demand that CCP go onto great financial success with its two new games in order for EVE players to "win" this argument about the problems with Incarna.
So boiling it down to basics, the points I agree with you on are:
- CCP commits permanently to making Incarna optional (and I'd add: via docking into the hangar view, with the option to enter CQ from there)
- CCP commits permanently to keeping $ for PLEX the only MT in the game
- CCP acknowledges that the business model of F2P instanced shooters doesn't translate to a subscription-based MMO where every action by a player has an impact on the persistent virtual world
- CCP becomes more communicative about plans for the future of EVE in order to gain player respect and trust
The further outcome of regaining player respect and going on to financial success in their two new games is irrelevant to the "winning" outcomes of this spat.
It is a shame that there was no discussion about these points during the riots, and that player concerns have had to come to talking about these issues after the dust has settled.
[ Australian players join channel ANZAC ] |
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 07:50:00 -
[242]
Edited by: Jonathan Ferguson on 06/07/2011 08:06:42
Originally by: Mara Rinn
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Hopefully we can agree on those facts. Now here's what winning looks like (from my perspective:)
- CCP commits permanently to making Incarna optional.
- CCP commits permanently to keeping $ for GTC for PLEX the only MT in the game.
- CCP removes Aurum from the game.
- CCP agrees that since we have paid for 2 expansions per year with our inflated monthly subscription, and since this expansion is all about Spaceship Barbies, that they will allow us to play dressup with our Spaceship Barbies for 'free' (since we've already paid for it with our inflated monthly subscription.)
- CCP acknowledges that Hilmar's idea to gouge players because he saw a slideshow on the Internets about gouging players in a F2P game doesn't work in the industry's most expensive subscription-based MMO.
- CCP restores adequate funding to EVE development (Internet Spaceships.)
- CCP regains the respect and trust of its playerbase, and goes on to great financial success from its 2 new games, which can operate on whatever financial model Hilmar dreams up because they are new games with no established precedents/understandings.
See, that list wasn't around before the riots.
I'd agree with you on some of those except your comment about "inflated monthly subscription" in points 4 and 5, your assertion that there is inadequate funding for EVE development, the requirement to scrap Aurum, and your demand that CCP become successful in its two new ventures.
Aurum provides a means to ensure that PLEX are destroyed. As such it means that people buying vanity items are directly contributing to CCP's bottom line, and thus providing more funds for "adequate" funding of EVE development.
I'm not sure how you could demand that CCP go onto great financial success with its two new games in order for EVE players to "win" this argument about the problems with Incarna.
So boiling it down to basics, the points I agree with you on are:
- CCP commits permanently to making Incarna optional (and I'd add: via docking into the hangar view, with the option to enter CQ from there)
- CCP commits permanently to keeping $ for PLEX the only MT in the game
- CCP acknowledges that the business model of F2P instanced shooters doesn't translate to a subscription-based MMO where every action by a player has an impact on the persistent virtual world
- CCP becomes more communicative about plans for the future of EVE in order to gain player respect and trust
The further outcome of regaining player respect and going on to financial success in their two new games is irrelevant to the "winning" outcomes of this spat.
It is a shame that there was no discussion about these points during the riots, and that player concerns have had to come to talking about these issues after the dust has settled.
Sorry if the last bit about the other 2 games and respect/trust of its playerbase added confusion. I just hear a lot that the protesters want CCP to fail. I only want CCP to fail if it ****s me over. If it does right by me, I want Hilmar to becomes a billionaire and maybe start paying his employees what they're worth. That's all part of 'winning'. But first thing's first.
The 'inflated subscription' refers to what the average EVE player pays (or has paid on his behalf) each month to play EVE. And that # is higher than for any other MMO. So, that's where 'inflated' comes from, you can choose a different word if you like. Bottom line, EVE is a premium game, with a premium cost per player. P2W MT works in a FTP model, not in a premium subscription model. This is all just like, duh. But someone needs to get through to Hilmar.
Alex Gianturdo does not speak for me: "I represent those who voted for me, not 'everyone'." ~ The Mittani |
Alpheias
Euphoria Released HYDRA RELOADED
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 08:20:00 -
[243]
That you have chosen (Ferguson and alts) to further comment and post on the forums when you have repeatedly made your stance on the matter of MT, followed by how deeply disappointed you are about CCP and the whole spectacle, very clear to the community and CCP, if they can now be even bothered to read your whiny vitriol week after week, raises one simple question?
Why are you still here?
Shouldn't you join the crowd that has ragequit already and GTFO while you can because this daily routine of yours to post basically the same thing over and over again kinda erodes the whole message you are trying to relay. Unless you are little more than a whiny puss that has skill queues and POS fuel to worry about.
♫ When your ship gets blown to bits ♫ And you lose your Faction fits \☻/ Don't worry ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪ Be Happy \☻/ |
Zey Nadar
Gallente Unknown Soldiers B O R G
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 08:25:00 -
[244]
What makes the OT think the protest failed?
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 08:38:00 -
[245]
Originally by: Zey Nadar What makes the OT think the protest failed?
Because Zulu, Mittens and I all agree that it achieved nothing?
re Zulu: "In terms of where this latest situation ranks in EVEÆs history, Zulu doesnÆt appear to think too much of it, stating, ôNot to be dismissive, but I think EVE has seen more defining moments than this. ... This is, this is a bit of noise.ö
re Mittens: "Alex seemed to concur... It doesnÆt rank as high as something as the ôT20 scandalö in his eyes because nothing has really come of it, whereas the T20 scandal lead to numerous reforms that helped better the game overall. Alex describes this latest situation as basically a lot of ôsmoke and mirrorsö created due to the leaks and its resolution was simply dependent on being ôcleared away with better communication.ö
re me : top of page 2
Better question might be why you think we didn't lose.
Alex Gianturdo does not speak for me: "I represent those who voted for me, not 'everyone'." ~ The Mittani |
Cashcow Golden Goose
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 08:39:00 -
[246]
Originally by: Zey Nadar What makes the OT think the protest failed?
Perhaps ask "What changed as a result of the protests?" When you work out that the answer is "Absolutely nothing, not one thing" then you will know the answer to your question.
|
Khamelean
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 08:39:00 -
[247]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson
I don't agree that a company can't make a permanent commitment to its customers. If a company makes a calculation that the NPV of goodwill generated by making a permanent commitment exceeds the EV of leaving the option open to do what is forbidden by that commitment, then it should make that commitment. I think your argument would have a LOT more weight if CCP had said 'We are not planning and have no plans for any MT for anything other than PLEX and vanity items in the foreseeable future.' If they had said that, then I could see the 'you guys are paranoid argument' carrying a little weight. But their actual statement was (legally) meaningless. And soundwave won't even disavow what he wrote in Fearless. He's working on stuff NOW that is non-vanity MT. Take that to the bank.
As for waiting until 'CCP starts talking about plans' I don't like. Do you really expect CCP to openly talk about anything that might be remotely controversial now? Did you not read Fearless? Did they talk about any of that with us? C'mon now, please be reasonable.
Anyway, thx for the constructive post.
I would love to see an example of a company that has made such as a statement as the one you were hoping for. But as for the problem with their specific phrasing not covering exactly what you want, surely all this quotes together must give you some hint of CCP's intentions regarding virtual goods.
Quote: It is CCPæs plan that the Noble Exchange (NeX store) will be used for the sale of vanity items only. There are no plans, and have been no plans, as per previous communication and CSM meetings, to introduce the sale of game breaking items or enhancements in the NeX store.
Quote: The investment of money in EVE should not give you an unfair advantage over the investment of time. The CSM, under NDA, has been presented with CCPæs plans for continued evolution of the business model and agrees that nothing they saw breaks this principle. CCP has committed to sharing their plans with the CSM on this front on an ongoing basis.
Quote: However, just to prove the point of the Fearless newsletter and give you a further understanding of what it is then there are no and never have been plans to sell "gold ammo" for Aurum. In Fearless people are arguing a point, which doesn't even have to be their view, they are debating an issue. This is another example of how information out of context is no information at all.
Quote: We are convinced that CCP has no plans to introduce any game-affecting virtual goods, only pure vanity items such as clothing and ship skins. We have been repeatedly assured that there are no plans for ægold ammo', ships which have different statistics from existing common hulls, or any other feared ægame destroying' virtual goods or services. We have expressed our deep concern about potential grey areas that the introduction of virtual goods permits, and CCP has made a commitment to discuss any proposals that might fall into these grey areas in detail with CSM at the earliest possible stage.
As for fearless, it is an irrelevant piece of fluff. The fact that people still keep pointing to it as useful information is simply wrong.
|
Cashcow Golden Goose
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 08:54:00 -
[248]
Originally by: Khamelean As for fearless, it is an irrelevant piece of fluff. The fact that people still keep pointing to it as useful information is simply wrong.
What does it say at the bottom of the first page? DISCLAIMER: The views put forward in this magazine do not reflect general CCP company policies or decisions and are strictly individual opinions, written by CCPers or about CCPers who feel strongly about these issues.
Claiming it's not CCP policy is fine, except that CCP is a company comprising individuals. Ooops. Problem right there.
Here is one strictly personal opinion Kristoffer Touborg wants you to show him the money: "I would like virtual goods sales in EVE. In fact, IÆd like to sell a lot more than vanity items."
Who is Kristoffer Touborg, and what is his job?
LEAD GAME DESIGNER Primary responsible for "flying in space".
So CCP's lead game designer, responsible for the only bit of the game most people actually care about, helds a personal opinion that you should have to pay real money to fly in space in more powerful ships than somebody else.
That is the problem. Fearless is not irrelevant, it is very relevant. Fearless is not the only evidence available, used in conjunction with other evidence it becomes increasingly clear the lengths CCP are prepared to go to to lie and obfuscate their true intentions.
The protests achieved nothing, no back pedalling, no back tracking, no changes. Nothing.
The CSM this morning we find has completely sold out to CCP and are backing them all the way, since nothing has changed and all facts remain as they are, obvious, apparent, unhidden, this is the future of Eve set out for all to see.
It's not even conspiracy theory level evidence either, it is evidence from the horse's mouths, CCP themselves, confirmed by CCP to be from CCP. There is no interpretation required, no over thinking needed. Simply read what CCP say, but you have to read the actual words, not the words you are wishing they say, because what you wish it said will be irrelevant the day you realise what it actually says, it helps if you have played Magic: The Gathering to understand this concept.
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 09:07:00 -
[249]
Edited by: Tanya Fox on 06/07/2011 09:09:30
Originally by: Kogh Ayon The protest failed because even through CCP promised that vanity-items-only, lots people still left the game.
The protest did not fail, people were always going to leave once the protest became more than just about game content and focused just as much on the way CCP treated its customers.
Edit: I used the word treated because hopefully CCP would have learnt something from what happened.
|
Tanya Fox
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 09:20:00 -
[250]
Originally by: San Severina
Originally by: Important Person
Originally by: San Severina
way to crosspost out of context like a true douche
Why you call me douche? That's not nice. I am person of great import. I expected more from you.
a spade is a spade
a lemon is a lemon
to creep is to creep
Wonderful isn't it, don't you just love pointless sayings.
|
|
Vaerah Vahrokha
Minmatar Vahrokh Consulting
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 09:26:00 -
[251]
Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha on 06/07/2011 09:26:53 The protest did not end at all, so why should it be failed?
Just wait until CCP tries again to slip in PAY2WIN in our throats and you'll see how the protest is not over.
Auditing | Research | 3rd Party | Collateral Holding | EvE RL Charity |
Miss Rabblt
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 09:38:00 -
[252]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson Could you give me a rough example of how that discussion might have gone? Because if somebody with honest grievances was turned off by what the protesters did then certainly we can learn from that.
do you remember "late apology" thread? Where CCP member offered honest and open-eyes discussion? That thread was simply flooded with crybabies. 300 pages in few hours. I stoped to read at page 4. Because by that time it was clear to me that CCP has no change to read and answer ANYTHING in this thread. It is simply impossible.
This was perfect example.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 09:46:00 -
[253]
Originally by: Mara Rinn
So boiling it down to basics, the points I agree with you on are:
- CCP commits permanently to making Incarna optional (and I'd add: via docking into the hangar view, with the option to enter CQ from there)
- CCP commits permanently to keeping $ for PLEX the only MT in the game
- CCP acknowledges that the business model of F2P instanced shooters doesn't translate to a subscription-based MMO where every action by a player has an impact on the persistent virtual world
- CCP becomes more communicative about plans for the future of EVE in order to gain player respect and trust
The further outcome of regaining player respect and going on to financial success in their two new games is irrelevant to the "winning" outcomes of this spat.
It is a shame that there was no discussion about these points during the riots, and that player concerns have had to come to talking about these issues after the dust has settled.
I would happily resub both my accounts now if this were to happen.
Unfortunately i don't think it ever will .
Well put however
|
jackaloped
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 13:31:00 -
[254]
I really don't know why you went then. Do you really think CCP would have said they will sell non vanity items in the nex had you not physically been there?
Sorry you fell for their pr stunt. Live and learn.
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
|
Abrazzar
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 13:42:00 -
[255]
And the number one reason the protests failed is:
1.) Hekla is late for the party. --------
|
Squidely
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 14:01:00 -
[256]
Geesh Fergie...you're still really mad bro aren't you
just release it...*swoooooosh*...now just let it go...breathe in, breathe out...
see? all better.
|
Mara Rinn
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 23:16:00 -
[257]
Originally by: Cashcow Golden Goose Claiming it's not CCP policy is fine, except that CCP is a company comprising individuals. Ooops. Problem right there.
Here is one strictly personal opinion Kristoffer Touborg wants you to show him the money: "I would like virtual goods sales in EVE. In fact, IÆd like to sell a lot more than vanity items."
Who is Kristoffer Touborg, and what is his job?
LEAD GAME DESIGNER.
Now go read The Onion and see if you can find a parallel between the kind of "opinion" being floated in Fearless. The purpose of the extreme views expressed in Fearless is to encourage people to think about the issues: what is P2W? what is a balance issue? when does a vanity item become a power or concierge item?
The entire publication is tongue-in-cheek humour. Read it again with that in mind and have a bit of a giggle. Then get back to work recognising that selling shirts and shoes for real money is not game-breaking.
[ Australian players join channel ANZAC ] |
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 23:25:00 -
[258]
Originally by: Mara Rinn The entire publication is tongue-in-cheek humour. Read it again with that in mind and have a bit of a giggle. Then get back to work recognising that selling shirts and shoes for real money is not game-breaking.
If you're going to spread lies, spread them in another thread please? It's one thing to repeat lies already told by CCP, but now you're just making stuff up.
From Hilmar's email (emphasis mine):
"This we have done after months of research by a group of highly competent professionals, soliciting input and perspective from thought leaders and experts in and around our industry. We have communicated our intention here internally in very wide circles through the Virtual Economy Summit presentation at the GSM, our Fearless newsletter, sprint reviews, email lists and multiple other channels. This should not come as a surprise to anyone."
This should not come as a surprise to anyone ... except our customers.
|
Borun Tal
Minmatar Just Abide
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 23:27:00 -
[259]
Read entire thread, came away thinking this: This whole "event" is perfect for a late-night telenovella on American TV. And about as genuine as that.
Moral of the story: failquitters failed to quit, and a bunch of little crybabies stamped their feet and took their toys home.
|
Juliette DuBois
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 23:29:00 -
[260]
There is not much point producing internal newsletter that takes several hours from real work time every month if it does not serve a purpose besides being a toiletwipe. But then again, this is CCP...
|
|
Ranger 1
Amarr Paragon Fury Cascade Imminent
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 23:41:00 -
[261]
Quote: "I would like virtual goods sales in EVE. In fact, IÆd like to sell a lot more than vanity items."
Except for the fact that there are a large number of options that do not fall neatly into either the "vanity" or the "pay to win" categories.
Examples of those items/services have been touched on countless times in other threads. Some would be fine, others would require discussion, while others still (while not pay to win) would not be acceptable as they infringe on area's that either would be detrimental to the game in other ways or should be included under the basic subscription fee.
These would be the grey area's referred to in their statements, and a strong point of interest to the CSM.
To sum up, "I would like to sell more than vanity items" in no way equals "I want to capitalize on pay to win items".
===== The world will not end in 2012, however there will be a serious nerf to Planetary Interaction. |
Selinate
Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 23:41:00 -
[262]
True protestors biomass their characters. Otherwise, you're not making a strong enough statement.
Go the way of Thfch Quảng Đức, the real way to protest.
|
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.06 23:57:00 -
[263]
Originally by: Mara Rinn
Originally by: Cashcow Golden Goose Claiming it's not CCP policy is fine, except that CCP is a company comprising individuals. Ooops. Problem right there.
Here is one strictly personal opinion Kristoffer Touborg wants you to show him the money: "I would like virtual goods sales in EVE. In fact, IÆd like to sell a lot more than vanity items."
Who is Kristoffer Touborg, and what is his job?
LEAD GAME DESIGNER.
Now go read The Onion and see if you can find a parallel between the kind of "opinion" being floated in Fearless. The purpose of the extreme views expressed in Fearless is to encourage people to think about the issues: what is P2W? what is a balance issue? when does a vanity item become a power or concierge item?
The entire publication is tongue-in-cheek humour. Read it again with that in mind and have a bit of a giggle. Then get back to work recognising that selling shirts and shoes for real money is not game-breaking.
You're either on the CCP payroll or just a really bad troll. I refuse to believe that you are this wrong by accident or through ignorance, at this point that's almost impossible.
Although we know the newsletter is not a joke, even if it were, I fail to see how anyone could giggle at any of it. There is nothing humorous about the ideas put forward in that newsletter. Nada, zip, zero.
[Australian players don't bother with channel ANZAC]
|
Ranger 1
Amarr Paragon Fury Cascade Imminent
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 00:01:00 -
[264]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson
Originally by: Mara Rinn The entire publication is tongue-in-cheek humour. Read it again with that in mind and have a bit of a giggle. Then get back to work recognising that selling shirts and shoes for real money is not game-breaking.
If you're going to spread lies, spread them in another thread please? It's one thing to repeat lies already told by CCP, but now you're just making stuff up.
From Hilmar's email (emphasis mine):
"This we have done after months of research by a group of highly competent professionals, soliciting input and perspective from thought leaders and experts in and around our industry. We have communicated our intention here internally in very wide circles through the Virtual Economy Summit presentation at the GSM, our Fearless newsletter, sprint reviews, email lists and multiple other channels. This should not come as a surprise to anyone."
This should not come as a surprise to anyone ... except our customers.
I don't think "tongue in cheek" is the correct phrase, however it is far from a lie.
A couple of things to consider:
1: There has undoubtedly been more than one issue of Fearless that touches on this issue.
2: The title of the Fearless edition "Greed is Good?" conveys a strong impression that the popular understanding of the meaning of that phrase is questionable, that being that greed is all a company needs to survive (obviously referencing the popular quote from Wall Street).
If you also take into consideration the fact that they have maintained from the very beginning that the articles contained within were requested to be written from a point of view not necessarily their own it becomes highly plausible that the issue was devoted primarily to over the top, Gordon Gekko-esque view points that serve to promote conversations in house about why the official company stance is diametrically opposed to such a stance.
The title itself serves also as a reminder as to what the consequences can be for those that take the Greed is Good philosophy to heart (in Wall Street it ruins his life).
Whether you take this interpretation to heart, or choose to only take it a face value, is a personal decision. But choosing to believe the articles were written to illustrate the points above certainly isn't an attempt to spread a lie. It is simply making a choice of whether or not to believe CCP's stance on why the articles were written to begin with.
===== The world will not end in 2012, however there will be a serious nerf to Planetary Interaction. |
San Severina
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 00:16:00 -
[265]
Originally by: Ranger 1 Edited by: Ranger 1 on 07/07/2011 00:09:12 Edited by: Ranger 1 on 07/07/2011 00:08:11
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson
Originally by: Mara Rinn The entire publication is tongue-in-cheek humour. Read it again with that in mind and have a bit of a giggle. Then get back to work recognising that selling shirts and shoes for real money is not game-breaking.
If you're going to spread lies, spread them in another thread please? It's one thing to repeat lies already told by CCP, but now you're just making stuff up.
From Hilmar's email (emphasis mine):
"This we have done after months of research by a group of highly competent professionals, soliciting input and perspective from thought leaders and experts in and around our industry. We have communicated our intention here internally in very wide circles through the Virtual Economy Summit presentation at the GSM, our Fearless newsletter, sprint reviews, email lists and multiple other channels. This should not come as a surprise to anyone."
This should not come as a surprise to anyone ... except our customers.
I don't think "tongue in cheek" is the correct phrase, however it is far from a lie.
A couple of things to consider:
1: There has undoubtedly been more than one issue of Fearless that touches on this issue.
2: The title of the Fearless edition "Greed is Good?" (emphasis on the question mark) conveys a strong impression that the popular understanding of the meaning of that phrase is questionable, that being that greed is all a company needs to survive (obviously referencing the popular quote from Wall Street).
If you also take into consideration the fact that they have maintained from the very beginning that the articles contained within were requested to be written from a point of view not necessarily their own it becomes highly plausible that the issue was devoted primarily to over the top, Gordon Gekko-esque view points that serve to promote conversations in house about why the official company stance is diametrically opposed to such a philosophy.
The title itself serves also as a reminder as to what the consequences can be for those that take the Greed is Good philosophy to heart (in Wall Street it ruins his life).
Whether you take this interpretation to heart, or choose to only take the articles at face value, is a personal decision. But choosing to believe the articles were written to illustrate the points above certainly isn't an attempt to spread a lie. It is simply making a choice of whether or not to believe CCP's stance on why the articles were written to begin with.
|
Ranger 1
Amarr Paragon Fury Cascade Imminent
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 00:26:00 -
[266]
Edited by: Ranger 1 on 07/07/2011 00:26:41
Interesting way to illustrate my point. ===== The world will not end in 2012, however there will be a serious nerf to Planetary Interaction. |
Iris Saavedra
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 00:36:00 -
[267]
Edited by: Iris Saavedra on 07/07/2011 00:46:09 I would like to point out that using an alternate account to circumvent moderation or administrative action, such as a suspension or a ban, is generally considered a bannable offense itself. That's how it works in other communities I've been in, that's how it works in the community that I moderate in, and it generally works pretty well.
The reason you didn't win, Mr. Ferguson, is because you didn't set achievable goals. You're not in a position to make demands of CCP's internal resources, and you're not in a position to make demands of the development and execution of their intellectual property. If you want that ability, you need to become a shareholder of the company, and gain a large enough share to be meaningful. Until then, the most meaningful action you can hope to take is to take your business elsewhere and offer a non-recommendation to your associates. Ultimately, creating threads like this in a community made of hundreds of thousands of people who don't care about you isn't going to accomplish anything.
|
Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 00:39:00 -
[268]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Originally by: baltec1 It stopped because the bulk of us didnt want none vanity items. CCP has now said the will not go down that road so we are happy again.
Its as simple as that.
No, they didn't. And no, it's not.
I think it's fair to say that if Incarna had been released with the option to dock-to-hangar, had included a greater variety of prices in the MT store, and had included a commitment from CCP to never sell non-vanity items or convenience or functionality EVER, it would have still been the worst 'expansion' of all time.
So no, after stalling for over a week, (and jeopardizing the mental and physical health and well-being of poor White Tree,) a toothless statement that we have no plans to sell non-vanity items in our vanity items store (which is precisely what the statement says) doesn't cut it.
"It is CCPæs plan that the Noble Exchange (NeX store) will be used for the sale of vanity items only. There are no plans, and have been no plans, as per previous communication and CSM meetings, to introduce the sale of game breaking items or enhancements in the NeX store."
MT wasn't going to exist either if you check the record there broheim.
Nice monocle. . Adapt and overcome or become a monkey on an evolution poster.
|
Camese
Gallente Geminus Gateway
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 00:57:00 -
[269]
This thread keeps going... endless discussion, or is this just looping now?
Originally by: San Severina
Originally by: Ranger 1
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson
Originally by: Mara Rinn The entire publication is tongue...
If you're going to spread lies..
I don't think...
http://www.pammarketingnut.com/wp-content/uploads/trust-big.png
Yup, I'm bored...
|
Maverick2011
Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 02:02:00 -
[270]
"Did I miss any?"
yea you forgot this one:
11- It didn't fail. CCP knows EVE players are not a bunch of imbeciles who will take it up the ass for anything (well some will, thats why they bought monocles).
|
|
Zey Nadar
Gallente Unknown Soldiers B O R G
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 08:08:00 -
[271]
Edited by: Zey Nadar on 07/07/2011 08:09:14
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson
Originally by: Zey Nadar What makes the OT think the protest failed?
Because Zulu, Mittens and I all agree that it achieved nothing?
I was under impression it was one of the reasons that made CCP call for the emergency CSM meeting?
I know I didnt expect anything to change, anything that was already released, anyway. I expected them to rethink their plans, and the changes would be invisible to us, revealed only in future releases. The actual protest was only a small part of the outcry, anyway. Did it make your life miserable in Jita? I would laugh for that..
|
Cashcow Golden Goose
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 08:31:00 -
[272]
Originally by: Mara Rinn
Originally by: Cashcow Golden Goose Claiming it's not CCP policy is fine, except that CCP is a company comprising individuals. Ooops. Problem right there.
Here is one strictly personal opinion Kristoffer Touborg wants you to show him the money: "I would like virtual goods sales in EVE. In fact, IÆd like to sell a lot more than vanity items."
Who is Kristoffer Touborg, and what is his job?
LEAD GAME DESIGNER.
Now go read The Onion and see if you can find a parallel between the kind of "opinion" being floated in Fearless. The purpose of the extreme views expressed in Fearless is to encourage people to think about the issues: what is P2W? what is a balance issue? when does a vanity item become a power or concierge item?
The entire publication is tongue-in-cheek humour. Read it again with that in mind and have a bit of a giggle. Then get back to work recognising that selling shirts and shoes for real money is not game-breaking.
It says at the beginning that these are the views of the people who make the game. It then tells me their views.
Then you tell me it's not their views.
gf n1.
|
Marcus Vorenius
Caldari Task Force 42
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 19:49:00 -
[273]
Edited by: Marcus Vorenius on 07/07/2011 19:54:32 From Twitter:
Re thread http://t.co/9IFtcpM We did not fail, but the 'strong ties' should have used the 'weak ties' more http://t.co/rKnecBY | #tweetfleet
--------------------------- http://p3technocrat.blogspot.com/ |
Kalestia Barrak
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 19:51:00 -
[274]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Did I miss any?
Yup.
People vote with their wallets.
In this case, they voted to keep paying.
|
Naradius
DEATHFUNK
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 20:49:00 -
[275]
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
Not the best post from a CSM, I've seen . I do really appreciate you putting yourself out to make the journey, but you, and only you, put yourself forward for the job, so don't start b*tching at others when things get tough...especially, don't alienate those that voted you in, and whose views you are suppose to represent in the first place.
|
Alpheias
Euphoria Released HYDRA RELOADED
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 10:50:00 -
[276]
Originally by: Naradius
Originally by: White Tree If you knew anything about the living hell I've had to go through these last 5 days to get to Iceland and back you wouldn't be spouting what you're spouting now. A mixture of flight delays, missed flights, lost passports and more just so I could go to Iceland and shout at CCP for 48 hours only to crawl home (I'm STILL not home nearly 72 hours after the summit ended) and I get to come back to people sitting in their diapers crying about how we were 'bought' by CCP. You literally have no idea what you're talking about and I've actually put my physical health on the back burner for YOUR interests and so did the rest of the CSM so just chill out with the endless stream of nonsense you constantly fire at us. We're not superheroes and we made some serious sacrifices to be able to drop EVERYTHING to go to Iceland and hash this out.
We didn't get drunk and we didn't have fun because quite frankly we were too tired, too stressed and too overworked to be able to stop for a moment and consider anyone's concerns other than yours. The same can be mirrored for CCP who were genuinely worried and concerned about the problems the players had. We sat and watched as THE greatest technical achievement the company has ever put forward was perpetually overshadowed by problems. I'm sorry if you didn't get everything you wanted exactly how you wanted it but your entitlements stretch far and beyond their reach so simmer down and think about what you're saying before you say it.
Not the best post from a CSM, I've seen . I do really appreciate you putting yourself out to make the journey, but you, and only you, put yourself forward for the job, so don't start b*tching at others when things get tough...especially, don't alienate those that voted you in, and whose views you are suppose to represent in the first place.
I'd like to see you try being civil to anyone after a mixture of flight delays, missed flights, misplaced passports and whatnot. |
Aralello
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 11:26:00 -
[277]
Edited by: Aralello on 08/07/2011 11:26:42 The general EvE populace have to be the biggest ******* whiners in this god damn universe.
Knee-jerk reactions to every single thing and you lot will never be happy and spout about how this would be easy to implement this that and the next thing.
Barely any of you understand business (or the English language half the time) and the amount of time needed to plan/develop/test and implement.
You are all consumers. You consume their product, don't like it? Tough ****. Just be glad they have listened long enough now and actually there are no game-breaking mechanics, just expensive vanity items. None of you take the whole picture into account and are in fact: spoiled and ungrateful little brats.
Reality check and a breath of fresh air is needed for a lot of you I believe. |
Jenshae Chiroptera
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 14:51:00 -
[278]
Originally by: Aralello You are all consumers. You consume their product, don't like it?
Consumers
You are American aren't you? |
Alu Utukku
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 17:54:00 -
[279]
Top 5 -
5) People say alot of things, and in a large enough number of cases do the opposite of what they say.
4) the game isn't quite on the precipice everyone who protested seems to think it is.
3) A large portion of people engage in busy work just to make it look good, there's a lot of 'busy work' at CCP just to see what sticks to the wall when thrown.
2) The ability to protest in a virtual world is rather limited. spiking a statue with webs and laser beams is not a protest, it's a waste.
1) CCP really couldn't give a crap. If the number of botting accounts approaches even 30% of the number people like to think it is, and that the DRF has financed itself and its' operations via this method, then why the f*** would you believe they'd care about 2% of the gaming population of Eve having a stroke over MT?
(the above may or may not include moments of satire, it is up to the reader to decide what is and isn't real ;p) |
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 18:01:00 -
[280]
Originally by: Alpheias
Originally by: Naradius
Originally by: White Tree whaaaaaaaa
Not the best post from a CSM, I've seen . I do really appreciate you putting yourself out to make the journey, but you, and only you, put yourself forward for the job, so don't start b*tching at others when things get tough...especially, don't alienate those that voted you in, and whose views you are suppose to represent in the first place.
I'd like to see you try being civil to anyone after a mixture of flight delays, missed flights, misplaced passports and whatnot.
Don't post then, sorted. |
|
Aralello
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 18:49:00 -
[281]
Originally by: Jenshae Chiroptera
Originally by: Aralello You are all consumers. You consume their product, don't like it?
Consumers
You are American aren't you?
No. I'm not.
I'm from Scotland. |
Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 18:52:00 -
[282]
Originally by: Kalestia Barrak
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
Did I miss any?
Yup.
People vote with their wallets.
In this case, they voted to keep paying.
So you get your connection statistics from somewhere that is not the EvE API? Because that system indicates the opposite of what you are saying, and it is the official source.
Link please and thank you. I say that because I know you are not trolling numbers out of thin air. |
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.13 18:52:00 -
[283]
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1419106&page=12#343
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson God, some of you are so dense I can't tell if you're trolling, CCP alts, or are actually dumb enough to believe the crap you're spewing.
First, to those who say 'but you can already buy a character with $, why not buy SP with $?'
The issue is scarcity. That's what makes something valuable. If someone transfers their 100M SP toon to somebody else, they haven't made my 100M SP toon (if I had one) less valuable. If CCP starts allowing someone (or dozens of someones) to start creating 100M SP toons out of thin air, then CCP is, in effect, spitting in the faces of their most loyal customers. (Actually this would be nothing new for CCP, think of a slightly more degrading activity perhaps.)
CCP has a goose. That goose is called EVE. It lays golden eggs. Don't kill the goose, CCP. If you want to squeeze more money out of your playerbase, here's a radical idea: EARN IT. Commit to EXCELLENCE. Bring EVE out of beta. Then say 'We delivered, now we're going to charge a little more.'
Who goes out of their way to destroy the greatest thing they've ever done in their miserable lives? Keep EVE great, make it BETTER. Follow the herd in your OTHER games. If you set the example with EVE by staying true to the original, revolutionary, concept and demonstrate once again that you are a company that has integrity, you will repair your reputation, will have more subscribers for ALL your games, and when you're old and on your deathbed you'll be able to feel like you did at least one worthwhile thing while you were here on earth. Or you can just try to squeeze every last miserable buck out of your players and you will reap what you have sown.
"I represent those who voted for me, not 'everyone'. Don't give me your entitled voter schtick ..." ~CSM Chair Mittens |
Mister Smithington
|
Posted - 2011.07.13 18:57:00 -
[284]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson Bumping my own thread by quoting myself because I'm a self-important S.O.B. and other people need to take me as seriously as I take myself.
FYP
|
Brujo Loco
Amarr Brujeria Teologica
|
Posted - 2011.07.13 20:22:00 -
[285]
Even though OP spouts some ideas I believe to be a bit extreme, even for me, I wholeheartedly agree. Anyone saying EVE is "well" atm is answering out of their head what THEY think its real. Check the API, check the current pop, for this still being summer, number are "LOW".
Why? Because what everyone out there on the side of the fence that want to put this under the rug wants is just a "normal" environment. They want the old eve back, they see the dissenters as obsessed zealots full of hatred, and in their denial they just want to believe they were right. To be honest, NO ONE WON in this, not the protesters, not the opposers, not CCP, no one won Anything, even if CCP is SWIMMING IN CASH , they still lost whatever credibility they had in the gaming world, and I know that currently, word of mouth advertising is in the negative scale for them.
Go to any MMO , WOW/WoT/LOTRO/COH and just say in or begin a topic with something like this "OMG EVE ONLINE SUX" and let the replies fill you in on the game. because, when you go to those communities of gaming, that's the target of the "NEW FEARLESS GREED" plan of them, to cater to the audiences that are not like the old core of subbers.
Anyway, WE ALL LOST.
The Dream is over, all that is left is the tattered remains being revivified for a new experience some of us <including me> did NOT WANT.
I was a pro Incarna fan, until the moment I realized all it entailed. The game is not what it was.
Unsub? eventually, but will keep lurking around here to see what is happening.
I even know some people actively "paying" with their labour hate campaigns to inform newcomers to AVOID EVE. Even though also a bit extreme for me, I understand their feelings.
CCP just reaped what they sowed, and they are now sowing a whole new breed of people. Let's see how it settles after the storm.
And despite any kind of point you make, nothing will make me believe the most boneheaded move ever by CCP was the lack of proper PR standup to this. All of this could have been avoided if they DARED to show their faces and say everything that was happening, from real people, not a lame wall of text minute.
A small video in youtube by the devs saying what they wanted with EVE would have worked wonders in quelling this.
Where people see nothing of import in pixelated lasers attacking a pizelated statue, others <even several colleagues of mine> saw the great future and potential for the new set of Third Wave electronic revolutions.
Where some people here see lag and spam, others see joyous words of dissent spreading at the speed of light and the hint at greater things to come.
We live in a new world and I'm proud to have been an E-Protester, even if in your eyes we are commies, hippies or bums we are the new batch of Online Dissenters and Reactionaries that will try to scream FREEDOM!, even if we are banned, Ip blocked and D/C .
I see for me as a student of human behavior, a huge success, for me as an EVE player a lack of real winnings or losing, but a storm that changes the landscape.
CCP is willing to move in a direction some of us hate, despite the statements that say the contrary, CCP also shows they Speak about going left, when all they do is veer slowly or grossly to the right. They have done that before, they are doing it now.
Why then should people like OP or me, or anyone else for that matter, BELIEVE a single word of what they say?
They have proven time and time again they don't care, their way of dealing with situations is blatantly disrespectful and outright patronizing to the community. Their dev alt postings only keep showing it, and they fail to understand people CAN and WILL disagree with them despite THEM believing they doing it RIGHT.
I sometimes wonder if the core management being from Iceland, and their local customs interfering somehow in their PR stunts on a GLOBALIZED community, like the one here.
---Eve is not dying, its being murdered ----
|
Jinx Kaundur
|
Posted - 2011.07.13 20:30:00 -
[286]
Edited by: Jinx Kaundur on 13/07/2011 20:35:30
Originally by: Mister Smithington
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson Bumping my own thread by quoting myself because I'm a self-important S.O.B. and other people need to take me as seriously as I take myself.
FYP
Turd Ferguson.
@all the other melodramatic "dream is lost," posters: Rofl.
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.24 23:33:00 -
[287]
Edited by: Jonathan Ferguson on 24/07/2011 23:37:19
Originally by: Jinx Kaundur Edited by: Jinx Kaundur on 13/07/2011 20:35:30
Originally by: Mister Smithington
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson Bumping my own thread by quoting myself because I'm a self-important S.O.B. and other people need to take me as seriously as I take myself.
FYP
Turd Ferguson.
@all the other melodramatic "dream is lost," posters: Rofl.
Turd Ferguson is one of the funnier characters created by SNL. If you want to call me Turd Ferguson, go at it. We can call the protest the Clash of the Turds: Me, Alex Gianturdo, and CCP.
But really the protest has more of a South Park flavor to me. CCP's customers are saying: CCP, we can't tell the difference between Incarna and a reheated turd in a microwave! and CCP is saying: Nothing to see here.
Meanwhile, Darius is saying 'He's coming right for us!'
"I represent those who voted for me, not 'everyone'. Don't give me your entitled voter schtick ..." ~CSM Chair Mittens |
GeoBlue
|
Posted - 2011.07.25 02:22:00 -
[288]
And the #1 reason the protest didnt work was.....
CCP DOESN"T GIVE A CHIT!!!
Plain and simple.
|
Jon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.25 20:18:00 -
[289]
Originally by: GeoBlue And the #1 reason the protest didnt work was.....
CCP DOESN"T GIVE A CHIT!!!
Plain and simple.
True 'nuff. CCP is betting the farm on the hope that their customer base is so easily distracted and addicted that they will be placated by some PR fluff and just keep playing and paying. Especially now that many of their most vocal and articulate critics have left.
Once they force us to move over to new forums (is that next week?) they can sweep it all under the rug.
|
Crasniya
|
Posted - 2011.07.25 20:39:00 -
[290]
"Dev alts" is a troll excuse for not understanding that everyone doesn't agree with them.
I'm a 22-year-old System Administrator with a Bachelor's of Science in Game and Simulation Programming, living in the suburbs of Chicago, IL. Yes, I understand game programming. No, I have not, and never will, work for CCP.
I've been called a CCP alt about 20 times in the last month.
|
|
Jon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.25 20:48:00 -
[291]
Originally by: Crasniya "Dev alts" is a troll excuse for not understanding that everyone doesn't agree with them.
I'm a 22-year-old System Administrator with a Bachelor's of Science in Game and Simulation Programming, living in the suburbs of Chicago, IL. Yes, I understand game programming. No, I have not, and never will, work for CCP.
I've been called a CCP alt about 20 times in the last month.
Poor grammar and exaggeration aside, let's stick to the dev alt issue.
We know that there are dev alts posting on forums. We don't know if any particular alt is a dev alt, a fanboi alt, or just a troll.
If CCP believes in the validity of their actions, they should be willing to defend them openly.
If they don't, then they are grossly unethical and worthy of the scorn being heaped upon them.
Whether or not a few confused but well-meaning souls are mistaken as dev alts is not a concern of mine. Explain why it should be.
|
Crasniya
|
Posted - 2011.07.25 20:54:00 -
[292]
Edited by: Crasniya on 25/07/2011 20:57:32 Edited by: Crasniya on 25/07/2011 20:57:06 Edited by: Crasniya on 25/07/2011 20:54:47 How do we "know" that there are dev alts posting in support of CCP? Has CCP stated that some of their devs alts post in support of CCP on the forums? Or are you assuming there "has" to be, because you don't believe that many people actually like the game.
Also: What grammatical errors? I'm referred to as a Grammar **** in most camps. So if you'd care to spell out your issues with my post, please do.
Sigh... can't use that term on the forums. It's not like it's a swear word, yes, they were a horrible group of people that killed a lot of innocent people. But are they "They-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named"? I say "Voldemort" too.
Sal****er <- S A L T W A T E R
|
Mallak Azaria
Three 6 MaFiA KRYSIS.
|
Posted - 2011.07.25 21:03:00 -
[293]
Are people really still crying about this dead topic?
================================================== I love and hate 0.0 these days and feel CCP is taking a big **** on my chest every time i see super carriers. ~Tipsy McStagger |
Jon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.25 21:11:00 -
[294]
Originally by: Crasniya Also: What grammatical errors? I'm referred to as a Grammar **** in most camps. So if you'd care to spell out your issues with my post, please do.
Here you go. Let's see if you can tell the difference between these two sentences:
"Dev alts" is a troll excuse for not understanding that everyone doesn't agree with them.
"Dev alts" is a troll excuse for not understanding that not everyone agrees with them.
Would you care to substantiate your troll claim (to use your terminology) that I or any of the other protesters thinks that everyone agrees with us?
Let's see if we can agree on this:
If there hasn't been a single anonymous dev (CCP employee) alt posting on these forums (in the past month and change) in support of CCP, then I am talking out of my ass. If there has been at least one anonymous dev (CCP employee) alt posting on these forums (in the past month and change) in support of CCP, then you are talking out of yours.
|
Tautut
The Union Of The Snake
|
Posted - 2011.07.25 21:18:00 -
[295]
Originally by: Jon Ferguson
Let's see if we can agree on this:
If there hasn't been a single anonymous dev (CCP employee) alt posting on these forums (in the past month and change) in support of CCP, then I am talking out of my ass. If there has been at least one anonymous dev (CCP employee) alt posting on these forums (in the past month and change) in support of CCP, then you are talking out of yours.
Lmao - how will you ever know that? I don't think we need to confirm no dev-alt posting to determine that you're talking out of your ass.
Sorry to hear that you're having such a hard time with the game. Not everyone's good at playing it I suppose. Still - if 'Forum Warrior' was a game, you'd be elite... right?
The Union of the Snake [SNAKE]
|
Crasniya
|
Posted - 2011.07.25 21:18:00 -
[296]
I see a stylistic difference, I'm not sure I see one as more or less correct than the other.
I don't agree with you. You specifically stated that "we know". That indicates you have some way that you know, for sure, that there is at least one CCP dev alt posting on the forums. If you can't explain how you know that, then whether there is or isn't CCP alts on the forum is completely irrelevant, because you are indeed, talking out of your rear.
|
JC Ferguson
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2011.07.29 02:04:00 -
[297]
Thought of another reason why we failed. We didn't have a common communication channel. Bunch of us on eve-o (though a lot of us are censored/banned,) bunch of us on scrapheap, k-, twitter. Divide and conquer. The fact that not a single popular podcast had the balls to stand up to CCP (and mean it) didn't help.
Makes me feel bad for being so hard on the Lost in EVE guys. I thought their blind fanboism was particularly deplorable, but less than a month later and all the podcasts (like V&V) are reading from the same script (and giggling with/sucking up to the authors of that script.) (If I'm wrong, I'd love to be pointed in the direction of a podcast that hasn't drunk the Koolaid yet.)
|
Sullen Skoung
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 09:22:00 -
[298]
Originally by: baltec1 It stopped because the bulk of us didnt want none vanity items. CCP has now said the will not go down that road so we are happy again.
Its as simple as that.
lol cause theyre so trustworthy with them words -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too. |
El'Niaga
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 09:26:00 -
[299]
Check the average online.....the protests may have failed to change CCPs policies, but ultimately folks vote with their feet and they are.
|
Sullen Skoung
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 09:28:00 -
[300]
Originally by: Jon Ferguson
Once they force us to move over to new forums (is that next week?) they can sweep it all under the rug.
Remember, remember, the Fifth of September, the New Forum Treason and Plot. I know of no reason why the New Forum Treason should ever be forgot Goon Squad, tÆwas their intent to blow up our New Forums. Three score Threadnaughts struck a blow to prove old CCPÆs overthrow
-------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too. |
|
Thornat
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 09:42:00 -
[301]
Wether the protests where successful or not is completetly irrelevant. At the end of the day the most dangerous thing to Eve and CCP is the guy that doesn't care enough to protest, post on the forums and complain, simply he instead cancels his subscription without a word and never comes back. The silence exodus is far more dangerous than any in game protest, I mean think about it, every person that posts here and complains is still a customer, every person at the in game protest was a paying customer. You can't post here unless you have an active account, you can't log into the game without an active account. Its the 10,000 less people who used to be on every Friday night at 9pm that suddenly went missing, those are the ones that have very successfully sent the message to CCP. And unfortunatly their exodus is probobly permenant.
The damage has been done, wether it was the result of the protest or not is hard to say but Eves mass Exodus has finally arrived. Tonight is Saturday night, it will be prime time Europe in about 5-6 hours, will we see the 40k + players we have grown accustomed to or is it going to be yet another sub 25k night?
|
Sullen Skoung
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 09:52:00 -
[302]
Originally by: Thornat Its the 10,000 less people who used to be on every Friday night at 9pm that suddenly went missing, those are the ones that have very successfully sent the message to CCP. And unfortunatly their exodus is probobly permenant.
they dont care. Even with the missing people they dont care. Theyre showing that by not listening to us, Hilmar's letter, an the sweeping changes to high sec that are gonna pis everyone off there. Thats admittedly 80% of the population theyre ****ing off and THEY DONT CARE Its fairly obvious they dont want this game to succeed anymore for some reason. -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too. |
xxxTRUSTxxx
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 10:35:00 -
[303]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Kudos to CCP for defeating the uprising and retaining the right to break your game and wreck your company's financial future. Well played, CCP.
Here are 10 reasons (in no particular order) I think we lost:
1. Lack of a coherent message by the protesters.
2. Lack of buy-in from the leadership of any large alliance or any truly charismatic/well-spoken individual capable of getting GDI buy-in (to consolidate messaging/actions.)
3. Staggered subscription expiry.
4. Skill queues and POS fuel.
5. Prisoner's dilemma. (free riders)
6. EVE's ingrained culture of trolls and fanbois (plus the ability to post anonymously.)
7. The lack of alternative engaging sandbox games.
8. CSM willing to be bought off for a few drinks.
9. Large portion of the playerbase (including Mynxee! ) willing to be bought off with a few almost-meaningless words.
10. CCP stall tactics and counterintelligence/war propaganda (via dev alts)
Did I miss any?
yes you missed the main point of the whole thing.
NO game changing MT's
personaly and i get the feeling most of the eve community doesn't give a ****e if people are willing to spend real life money of clothes for their dolly.
people where not happy at the thought that CCP might introduce game changing MT's into eve, such as the so called gold ammo and so on.
CCP stated that they never intended to do this and won't be doing this, the community was in uproar, the demo's where all over gaming news sites, CCP called an emergency meetings with the CSM, the CSM members made a huge effort to get to iceland, we got a statement from CCP.
this post is all about one thing, which you pointed out lol
1. Lack of a coherent message by the protesters. (in this case you)
some people knew what was going on, some didn't care, some thought hey i'll just jump on the band wagon with my own personal whine.
we got a result, wtf do you want ? blood ?
|
Richard Hammond II
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 10:47:00 -
[304]
Originally by: xxxTRUSTxxx
CCP stated that they never intended to do this and won't be doing this, the community was in uproar, the demo's where all over gaming news sites, CCP called an emergency meetings with the CSM, the CSM members made a huge effort to get to iceland, we got a statement from CCP.
"Greed is Good" an Hilmar's letter spoke far louder than their supposed "we promise not to" statement --------- Fear the Hamster Long live Top Gear |
xxxTRUSTxxx
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 11:00:00 -
[305]
Edited by: xxxTRUSTxxx on 03/09/2011 11:00:42
Originally by: Richard Hammond II
Originally by: xxxTRUSTxxx
CCP stated that they never intended to do this and won't be doing this, the community was in uproar, the demo's where all over gaming news sites, CCP called an emergency meetings with the CSM, the CSM members made a huge effort to get to iceland, we got a statement from CCP.
"Greed is Good" an Hilmar's letter spoke far louder than their supposed "we promise not to" statement
he's running a company, companies are about making money. are you really surprised CCP are trying to find new ways to make a bigger profit ?
what i'm fearful of is this, NEX ****e sells, profits increase, Hilmar goes mmmm nice, invest more cash into the art/fashion which might lead to less being spent on departments that we'd like to see investments in.
|
Trixie Stardust
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 11:46:00 -
[306]
Edited by: Trixie Stardust on 03/09/2011 11:56:13
Originally by: xxxTRUSTxxx he's running a company, companies are about making money. are you really surprised CCP are trying to find new ways to make a bigger profit ?
But they became successful by being different. Why change that now.. why, CCP why.. we liked you when you were cool, now your just "the man."
|
Richard Hammond II
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 12:39:00 -
[307]
Originally by: xxxTRUSTxxx
what i'm fearful of is this, NEX ****e sells, profits increase, Hilmar goes mmmm nice, invest more cash into the art/fashion which might lead to less being spent on departments that we'd like to see investments in.
We're ALREADY seeing that - what was the last spaceships upgrade made that wasnt related to WiS
What IM really worried is they see the money they COULD be making with non vanity items. --------- Fear the Hamster Long live Top Gear |
Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 15:25:00 -
[308]
Originally by: xxxTRUSTxxx
he's running a company, companies are about making money. are you really surprised CCP are trying to find new ways to make a bigger profit ?
At what expense? You can make $500 a day for a week, or a steady $250 for a fair few years.... I know what I'd go for.
|
Epic DaSoto
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 15:55:00 -
[309]
It failed, much like the latest protest and riots in London failed - because most of the rioters were arsehats and didn't have the support of the general population.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: [one page] |