Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Valei Khurelem
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 21:33:00 -
[31]
Please please please do something about blob and gank fleets. |
Kalle Demos
Amarr Helix Protocol
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 21:41:00 -
[32]
Edited by: Kalle Demos on 08/07/2011 21:41:26
Originally by: Jack Tronic
Originally by: Kalle Demos [ 2. Supercarriers - Personally supercarriers are ONLY effective because the sov mechanics are so **** and dont require movement, do you really think people would use supercarriers like they do if sov warfare required you to move from one system to another several times an hour?
Being able to drop a super with 2 carriers on any large gang and being **** to effectively solo them all because you can outdps 20 logis and hictors can't be repped while tackling.
Are you trying to tell me you lost a large fleet where your logi count alone was 20+ to 3 ships? |
Lando Storm
Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 21:41:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Valei Khurelem Please please please do something about blob and gank fleets.
Just a Question What exactly could they do with out effecting other parts of fleet warfare ?
(Serious question) |
Smoking Blunts
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 21:45:00 -
[34]
how many times have they tweaked 0.0 in the last few years? how many times have they ****ed 0.0 over the last few years?
the answers to both of these are the same...
although at this point they couldnt **** it up much more than now??
could they |
cpu939
Gallente Volatile Nature Bloodbound.
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 21:49:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Smoking Blunts how many times have they tweaked 0.0 in the last few years? how many times have they ****ed 0.0 over the last few years?
the answers to both of these are the same...
although at this point they couldnt **** it up much more than now??
could they
this is why I posted this call out to make sure we have time to call bull**** when we see it and so ccp has time to go back to the table and change stuff or at lest tell us why |
Cancel Align NOW
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 21:52:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Smoking Blunts how many times have they tweaked 0.0 in the last few years? how many times have they ****ed 0.0 over the last few years?
the answers to both of these are the same...
although at this point they couldnt **** it up much more than now??
could they
Yes they could. Looking at history they will somehow find a way. |
Smoking Blunts
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 21:53:00 -
[37]
tbh, at this point id be happy if they just rolled it back to before the scap buff and all the sov upgrade ****.
paying for crap space..lol they must have been smoking crack when they came up with that |
Chris Fierce
Caldari NoD Imperium
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 21:56:00 -
[38]
How about we get some answers to this Soundwave? Hmm? Maybe? Like we have been told?
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1489084&page=15 |
Daminma
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 22:01:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Valei Khurelem Please please please do something about blob and gank fleets.
They already did with this whole NEX scandal. Less people to blob now. Rejoice! |
needarunner
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 23:27:00 -
[40]
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
Originally by: cpu939 as from this post from ccp soundwave http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1509071&page=27#794
those that don't want to click
Originally by: CCP Soundwave We'll be looking at 0.0 this winter. We're hammering down the principles we'll work by as we speak, and they're being reviewed by the CSM. Once they've had their chance to give feedback in person (later this month), I'll happily post the groundwork for everyone to see. From there on, detailed designwork and implementation.
It has been over a month since you posted that and I'm sure the CSM have had their look over it how about you keep your word ccp soundwave and post the groundwork as you called it?
now I don't think they/he will until a day or few days before the release, but I post this in the hopes that ccp will post this to build even more trust with the players by showing they keep their word(s)
Sorry about this. Greyscale has a devblog ready, but we were afraid that it would drown in all the drama going on the past weeks. Hopefully we'll be at a calmer place soon so we can get back to talking about spaceships. I looked at the CSM minutes today, and they have some good info too.
Sorry for not being able to deliver it to you sooner, but hopefully we can pass this info on soon.
By calmer, he means a server in decline to a point where all the people who give a crap have already left. Shame after the most anticipated patch in , your server fell by nearly 6000 per day
|
|
Murashu
Liberal Frontier Enterprises BricK sQuAD.
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 23:35:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Murashu on 08/07/2011 23:36:18
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
Originally by: cpu939 as from this post from ccp soundwave http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1509071&page=27#794
those that don't want to click
Originally by: CCP Soundwave We'll be looking at 0.0 this winter. We're hammering down the principles we'll work by as we speak, and they're being reviewed by the CSM. Once they've had their chance to give feedback in person (later this month), I'll happily post the groundwork for everyone to see. From there on, detailed designwork and implementation.
It has been over a month since you posted that and I'm sure the CSM have had their look over it how about you keep your word ccp soundwave and post the groundwork as you called it?
now I don't think they/he will until a day or few days before the release, but I post this in the hopes that ccp will post this to build even more trust with the players by showing they keep their word(s)
Sorry about this. Greyscale has a devblog ready, but we were afraid that it would drown in all the drama going on the past weeks. Hopefully we'll be at a calmer place soon so we can get back to talking about spaceships. I looked at the CSM minutes today, and they have some good info too.
Sorry for not being able to deliver it to you sooner, but hopefully we can pass this info on soon.
So those of us who actually enjoy EVE and plan to continue paying to play cannot get our info delivered because of a small vocal group of whiners? That doesn't really sound like CCP is working on improving their information sharing with the community. |
Lady Spank
Amarr Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 23:46:00 -
[42]
I too am interested in hearing confirmation of developments in INTERNET SPACESHIPS. |
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Legion RONA Directorate
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 02:22:00 -
[43]
Everyone we must tell all the trolls to calm down and take a break. Lets all sit back take a breather, and let all the dev blogs come out.
I left 0.0 cause of blobs, politics and other crap, maybe this will be the one that gets me back t wanting to do 0.0 |
Jackson Millenius
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 02:44:00 -
[44]
I read the leaked devblog.
Apparantly they're turning Sov warfare into capture the flag.
The TCU's n stations n stuff have about the same EHP as a Titan. Whoever takes the TCU down, and then sets their own up within 30 minutes, wins sov. |
Uearel Atram
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 02:59:00 -
[45]
Edited by: Uearel Atram on 09/07/2011 03:02:28 "Blobs" are fine, there isn't much lag these days, with fights of 800 people at least. What do you want them do to, set arbitrary limits on number of people in system? The real problem is supercap blobs, since they can only be countered by larger supercap blobs and not strategy or tactics.
http://imgur.com/a/dQUFc#ssATa
in that fight, on just one side, there were; -47 titans -116 supercarriers -around 150 carriers -40 dreads |
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 03:04:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Kalle Demos Will the blog be titled "Death to all supercaps!"?
Well you'd hope so, otherwise it would be pretty pointless. |
Ai Mei
Starfish Operating Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 05:13:00 -
[47]
Bumping because we need to kill forum rage. |
Uglavitch Nefrex
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 06:01:00 -
[48]
Grow a spine and post it! |
Furb Killer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 07:23:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Uearel Atram Edited by: Uearel Atram on 09/07/2011 03:09:39 "Blobs" are fine, there isn't much lag these days, with fights of 800 people at least. What do you want them do to, set arbitrary limits on number of people in system?
What I think they should do is make an activity based sov system, or something similar (actually live there to get sov, not just winning a few blob fests at some timers and going home again).
The result of any good sov system would be simply that if you are twice as strong you can hold onto twice as much space (roughly), while the current situation is that if the difference in strength is enough to overcome the defender advantage of the other side you will take all their space, regardless of how much space you already have. |
Vagilicious
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 08:00:00 -
[50]
While any update to the spaceship side of things is always good, whinging because CCP have been focusing on Incarna and NeX kinda takes the cake. We've all had several YEARS of spaceship content.. some good and some bad admittedly, but nevertheless lots of it. I for one am happy with the CQ - Incarna route and am really looking forward to it progressing.
|
|
Malcanis
Caldari Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 08:12:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Belt Humper 0.0 gets attention all the time. When the hell is low sec going to get thrown a bone?
Because after Domnion, you should be apprehensive about where that "bone" would go |
Zagdul
Gallente Shadowed Command Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 08:20:00 -
[52]
Start the blog with "this is meant to be a discussion and nothing below is carved in stone"
Here's what we like:
Here's our thoughts:
Here's what we've already decided:
If you go with this kind of a blog, you'll get people discussing more instead of arguing so much and quite possibly would drown out the drama instead of being drowned. |
Abdiel Kavash
Caldari Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 09:28:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Zagdul Start the blog with "this is meant to be a discussion and nothing below is carved in stone"
Here's what we like:
Here's our thoughts:
Here's what we've already decided:
If you go with this kind of a blog, you'll get people discussing more instead of arguing so much and quite possibly would drown out the drama instead of being drowned.
Supporting the above. The tone of several recent blogs has been more or less "here it is, deal with it". It would be great to actually get a blog about the development of new features. |
Kalle Demos
Amarr Helix Protocol
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 10:57:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Zagdul Start the blog with "this is meant to be a discussion and nothing below is carved in stone"
Here's what we like:
Here's our thoughts:
Here's what we've already decided:
If you go with this kind of a blog, you'll get people discussing more instead of arguing so much and quite possibly would drown out the drama instead of being drowned.
Agreed, though people tend to complain about everything anyway |
Logical Chaos
The Ankou Raiden.
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 12:29:00 -
[55]
They will now post the info when it's too late to change anything.
Of course it will also be utter bull****, but well it's too late isn't it? :D
You've heard it here first guys! |
Jack BingKaria
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 12:36:00 -
[56]
The only reason they hold it back might be rather simple. Instead of tweaking, its mostly a nerf for most people in 0.0
|
Kalle Demos
Amarr Helix Protocol
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 12:42:00 -
[57]
Originally by: Jack BingKaria The only reason they hold it back might be rather simple. Instead of tweaking, its mostly a nerf for most people in 0.0
A nerf to most people in 0.0 is a buff to Goons NC |
Salpun
Gallente Paramount Commerce
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 12:43:00 -
[58]
My quess is that we are now caught in the one devblog a day trap/rule set by the PR Department. Something that Soundwave might also have thought about while answering our questions/ only one good quote a day rule lol.
Anything that could be sayed at the moment is most likely in the May Minutes, hope its good news. Not just we are working on that. |
Jowen Datloran
Caldari Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 13:06:00 -
[59]
Nice, except it is a complete waste of time.
No matter what changes you might propose/implement you can bet your sorry ass that people will whine and complain and state that the old system was better or the changes were not good enough.
The only changes that are ever acceptable to a zero sec entity are the ones that massively unbalance the game in their favor.
Simply, do not bother and use resources on low sec where content is available to everybody and dire needed. |
Jackstah Whoosaa
DohMinion
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 13:42:00 -
[60]
Edited by: Jackstah Whoosaa on 09/07/2011 13:42:31
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
Originally by: cpu939 as from this post from ccp soundwave http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1509071&page=27#794
those that don't want to click
Originally by: CCP Soundwave We'll be looking at 0.0 this winter. We're hammering down the principles we'll work by as we speak, and they're being reviewed by the CSM. Once they've had their chance to give feedback in person (later this month), I'll happily post the groundwork for everyone to see. From there on, detailed designwork and implementation.
It has been over a month since you posted that and I'm sure the CSM have had their look over it how about you keep your word ccp soundwave and post the groundwork as you called it?
now I don't think they/he will until a day or few days before the release, but I post this in the hopes that ccp will post this to build even more trust with the players by showing they keep their word(s)
Sorry about this. Greyscale has a devblog ready, but we were afraid that it would drown in all the drama going on the past weeks. Hopefully we'll be at a calmer place soon so we can get back to talking about spaceships. I looked at the CSM minutes today, and they have some good info too.
Sorry for not being able to deliver it to you sooner, but hopefully we can pass this info on soon.
This sounds quite insulting.
Its the drama that YOU created.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |