Seriously - is this really a good thing?? Who cares??

Seriously - is this really a good thing?? Who cares??

Spaceship spinning > dead graphics cards.

stop buying ATI.

This must be really exciting news for all you hanger jockeys.

Now that y'all are happy, maybe the programmers can get back to doing something important.

Mr Epeen

Like WoD and Dust I'm guessing.

Spin!

Seriously - is this really a good thing?? Who cares??

If you want new news, sisi client wont let you past eula agreement because font and scrollbar to activate agreement button are missing.

No kidding, especially considering you could always just UNDOCK and spin away.

Total waste of time, worse giving into something that doesn't make sense from a Product Management perspective is a bad sign in the big picture, it indicates the company doesn't have a clear design direction.

Total waste of time

worse giving into something that doesn't make sense from a Product Management perspective is a bad sign in the big picture, it indicates the company doesn't have a clear design direction.

Improving the game is not a waste of time.
Agreed. If they had any sense of direction, they wouldn't have made the game worse by removing it to begin with.

Seriously - is this really a good thing?? Who cares??

Fixed that for you...and really...if your VCard burned out from WiS then it was time to upgrade anyway.

Videos or it didn't happen.

Spaceship spinning > dead graphics cards.

No kidding, especially considering you could always just UNDOCK and spin away.

Total waste of time, worse giving into something that doesn't make sense from a Product Management perspective is a bad sign in the big picture, it indicates the company doesn't have a clear design direction.

If you burned up your video card with CQ, then you were probably being an idiot and playing on a laptop, only to moan about how it overheats. No ****, Sherlock...craptops weren't meant to play graphics-intensive games. The nVidia/ATI argument is moot if you're playing on a desktop.

Whining about how you blew up your video card because you were foolishly playing on a craptop when you could've bought a desktop for half the price is the same as buying a Honda and complaining that you can't go as fast as a Ferrari.

And don't say you needed a laptop because you're a college student. Students have been going to university for thousands of years without a ******* laptop.

Wow, you sound really upset that people are buying a laptop. Are you mayhaps someone who deals in desktop computers?

Haha no, I'm just sick of all the people slagging on Incarna, saying it "blew up their computer" when they were moronically using a laptop to play a graphics-intensive video game. It's not 2003 anymore and this isn't WoW.

I have a laptop and a desktop, but I'm not ******** enough to attempt to play Eve with all its new updates on it.

These people are the Eve version of the Tea Party.

Or, you know, it could just be that people don't like when CCP spends the better part of a year neglecting any actual gameplay changes (especially wrt balance, which has arguably been neglected for even longer) to implement something that most people either don't care about or plain don't want, while at the same time upping the requirements to actually USE the thing they implemented, for no apparent reason. Yes, graphics intensive games are best not played on a laptop. No, CQ is NOT graphics intensive. It's one guy walking around one room, with graphics that, while decent, are in no way impressive enough to justify the computer requirements to run them (I for one LOVE the way half of my hand disappears into the back of my head every time I scratch my neck, it's like it's the 90s again, <3 nostalgia).

It's giving people problems because it's poorly optimized, not because people play games on laptops.

No.

Poorly optimized? Really? I have a 5 year old desktop with an nVidia GTS 450, 3 gigs of RAM and a dual core 3 gig processor and it runs flawlessly. FLAWLESSLY. Both CPU and GPU have never gone over 50 degrees Celsius with the game graphics on full blast.

It's not poorly optimized; sure, there was some code that needed improvement that gave people errors, but that's with every patch. No, the fact of the matter is that dumbasses want cutting edge graphics that will run on a ******* abacus with no problems.

Well, they can wish in one hand and sh!t in the other and see which one gets filled first. The fact that this was ever even an issue is another example that everyone who complains about Incarna's problems needs to seriously GTFO. It's one thing to complain about serious bugs and such, but slagging CCP as a whole because the players are too poor/stupid/both to upgrade the components of their hobby like EVERYONE ELSE ALREADY DOES simply means they are just oxygen to carbon dioxide converters. If you can't afford to upgrade your computer, then maybe you have much bigger problems that you're neglecting as it is. (Not you, just "you" in the second person)

They can all go die in a fire...they contribute absolutely nothing to this community or this game.

No.

Poorly optimized? Really? I have a 5 year old desktop with an nVidia GTS 450, 3 gigs of RAM and a dual core 3 gig processor and it runs flawlessly. FLAWLESSLY. Both CPU and GPU have never gone over 50 degrees Celsius with the game graphics on full blast.

No kidding, especially considering you could always just UNDOCK and spin away.

Total waste of time, worse giving into something that doesn't make sense from a Product Management perspective is a bad sign in the big picture, it indicates the company doesn't have a clear design direction.

Haha no, I'm just sick of all the people slagging on Incarna, saying it "blew up their computer" when they were moronically using a laptop to play a graphics-intensive video game. It's not 2003 anymore and this isn't WoW.

I have a laptop and a desktop, but I'm not ******** enough to attempt to play Eve with all its new updates on it.

These people are the Eve version of the Tea Party.

Apparently the average EVE player is a mouth breathing ****** who get's off on making up strawman arguments to justify the removal of features and a move backwards rather than development.

Fixed.

I refuse to accept you 'fixed' anything.

That would explain your inability to understand the actual issue.

Good.
Anyway i want to remind you all that CCP promised a better version of the 'ship spinning', an amazing new version and that was the reason why it was taking so long to put it back into the game.

Now.... this is exactly what we had already, so: CCP, where you lying or what?