Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
So its been a while since the CCP changes around producing tech. But nothings changed, Tech is still the same price. 
I guess we better get used to goonswarm online then
|

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
519
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

MIrple
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
165
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
Yes Goon busted their ass to conquer all the regions holding tech and maintain a logistical nightmare to reap these rewards but you should have it changed because your not them. GTFO and play something eles |

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:34:00 -
[4] - Quote
MIrple wrote:Yes Goon busted their ass to conquer all the regions holding tech and maintain a logistical nightmare to reap these rewards but you should have it changed because your not them. GTFO and play something eles
reported, your sad little angry comments are not needed...
oh and lets remember goons was given deklein - just saying
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1085
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:So its been a while since the CCP changes around producing tech. But nothings changed, Tech is still the same price.  I guess we better get used to goonswarm online then
Nothings changed?
When the alchemy changes went through Tech was selling just shy of 200k/unit, each moon making nearly 16 billion a month before fuel costs were considered.
The current ppu of tech is UNDER 80k/unit.
Your definition of "nothing" seems a bit off.
|

John DaiSho
Applied Creations The Fendahlian Collective
26
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
Actually, it isnt, Tech went down quite a bit but its still very profitable for all Tech holders. The new alchemy reactions did pull down the price for Tech but its hard to produce significant numbers that way. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2961
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
We have been forced to give swimming lessons to our accountants so that they dont drown in the money bin. |

Kobal81
14th Legion Black Core Alliance
34
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
Working as Intended "Greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit" |

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:35:00 -
[9] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa
not about goons really, i just threw the comment in... please dont get angry. its just a game. |

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:36:00 -
[10] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:MilitantMan wrote:So its been a while since the CCP changes around producing tech. But nothings changed, Tech is still the same price.  I guess we better get used to goonswarm online then Nothings changed? When the alchemy changes went through Tech was selling just shy of 200k/unit, each moon making nearly 16 billion a month before fuel costs were considered. The current ppu of tech is UNDER 80k/unit. Your definition of "nothing" seems a bit off.
no it was not what a load of rubbish is was not much different to now
http://www.eve-markets.net/detail.php?typeid=16649#history |
|

Jeremy Soikutsu
Homeworld Republic Intrepid Crossing
30
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:43:00 -
[11] - Quote
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/716/techh.jpg/ Taken like 2 minutes ago.
It should be noted that alchemy didn't fix Tech it just broke OTEC. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1085
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:43:00 -
[12] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:MilitantMan wrote:So its been a while since the CCP changes around producing tech. But nothings changed, Tech is still the same price.  I guess we better get used to goonswarm online then Nothings changed? When the alchemy changes went through Tech was selling just shy of 200k/unit, each moon making nearly 16 billion a month before fuel costs were considered. The current ppu of tech is UNDER 80k/unit. Your definition of "nothing" seems a bit off. no it was not what a load of rubbish is was not much different to now http://www.eve-markets.net/detail.php?typeid=16649#history
My alliance holds over 50 tech moons, adding that functional knowledge with that fancy market tab called Price History, then setting it to "6 Months" allows you to see back to June 2nd where the price was about 190k/unit. If you take a look at that tab it'll tell you how wrong you are and I wont have to waste anymore words doing it.
Short of that I can post a screen shot of the price history tab on the market window and show you and everybody else how wrong you are.
EDIT: Too late somebody else already posted the market window, showing you how wrong you are. |

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
250
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:46:00 -
[13] - Quote
YOU LEAVE TECH ALONE Follow me on twitter |

Xpaulusx
Naari LLC
106
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:51:00 -
[14] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:So its been a while since the CCP changes around producing tech. But nothings changed, Tech is still the same price.  I guess we better get used to goonswarm online then Hate to tell you, but the Tec problem existed ( concentration of moons in one region) long before Goons ever got deklien, in fact mittens even addressed the problem so don't blame goons blame CCP for the footdragging on this issue. New Player retention is important to our community. |

Inquisitor Kitchner
Galaxy Punks Executive Outcomes
536
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:53:00 -
[15] - Quote
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR GOOONS "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:54:00 -
[16] - Quote
Xpaulusx wrote:MilitantMan wrote:So its been a while since the CCP changes around producing tech. But nothings changed, Tech is still the same price.  I guess we better get used to goonswarm online then Hate to tell you, but the Tec problem existed ( concentration of moons in one region) long before Goons ever got deklien, in fact mittens even addressed the problem so don't blame goons blame CCP for the footdragging on this issue.
well it didnt really did it. There where a few dyspro and prom moons IN ALL Regions. Now there is sweet FA in the south and its all in the north. Plus there was nowhere near the same amount of dyspro moons etc compared to tech now |

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 17:57:00 -
[17] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:MilitantMan wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:MilitantMan wrote:So its been a while since the CCP changes around producing tech. But nothings changed, Tech is still the same price.  I guess we better get used to goonswarm online then Nothings changed? When the alchemy changes went through Tech was selling just shy of 200k/unit, each moon making nearly 16 billion a month before fuel costs were considered. The current ppu of tech is UNDER 80k/unit. Your definition of "nothing" seems a bit off. no it was not what a load of rubbish is was not much different to now http://www.eve-markets.net/detail.php?typeid=16649#history My alliance holds over 50 tech moons, adding that functional knowledge with that fancy market tab called Price History, then setting it to "6 Months" allows you to see back to June 2nd where the price was about 190k/unit. If you take a look at that tab it'll tell you how wrong you are and I wont have to waste anymore words doing it. Short of that I can post a screen shot of the price history tab on the market window and show you and everybody else how wrong you are. EDIT: Too late somebody else already posted the market window, showing you how wrong you are.
happy to stand corrected about the price, however the changes CCP made, was not the cause for that drop matey. Infact I doubt it has had any impact, it was supposed to have a much bigger impact, bringing price of tech down a lot its still pretty damn high
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1085
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote: well it didnt really did it. There where a few dyspro and prom moons IN ALL Regions. Now there is sweet FA in the south and its all in the north. Plus there was nowhere near the same amount of dyspro moons etc compared to tech now
There are in fact tech moons in the south (3+ that I know of), but you are right, there are a TON more dyspro and prom moons in the game then there are tech, and most players did in fact point this out, at the time of the change the NC held nearly all those moons, we pointed them out as conflict drivers when spread around the game but the Devs at the time just brushed off what we were telling them, ignored us, and put the changes in anyway.
The end result was that fight starters around the game were made useless and all the wealth of the game was concentrated in one section of the map.
Those of us who were smart decided to get us a piece of that pie since they weren't going to do anything about how broken they were making it.
Don't hold a grudge against the players who sought out and made homes and strongholds around where the money was, don't get mad and say that the alchemy changes haven't changed tech, get mad at the developers who ignored what the players told them would happen 2 years ago for stifling again and again fights around the game by hamfisting changes and refusing to review them for years after their poor implementation wreaks havoc on the game, I'm looking at you Dominion Sov and Tech changes. |

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:02:00 -
[19] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:MilitantMan wrote: well it didnt really did it. There where a few dyspro and prom moons IN ALL Regions. Now there is sweet FA in the south and its all in the north. Plus there was nowhere near the same amount of dyspro moons etc compared to tech now
There are in fact tech moons in the south (3+ that I know of), but you are right, there are a TON more dyspro and prom moons in the game then there are tech, and most players did in fact point this out, at the time of the change the NC held nearly all those moons, we pointed them out as conflict drivers when spread around the game but the Devs at the time just brushed off what we were telling them, ignored us, and put the changes in anyway. The end result was that fight starters around the game were made useless and all the wealth of the game was concentrated in one section of the map. Those of us who were smart decided to get us a piece of that pie since they weren't going to do anything about how broken they were making it. Don't hold a grudge against the players who sought out and made homes and strongholds around where the money was, don't get mad and say that the alchemy changes haven't changed tech, get mad at the developers who ignored what the players told them would happen 2 years ago for stifling again and again fights around the game by hamfisting changes and refusing to review them for years after their poor implementation wreaks havoc on the game, I'm looking at you Dominion Sov and Tech changes.
Who said I was mad? Im just stating facts, I am perfectly calm |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
601
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
Xpaulusx wrote:Hate to tell you, but the Tec problem existed ( concentration of moons in one region) long before Goons ever got deklien, in fact mittens even addressed the problem so don't blame goons blame CCP for the footdragging on this issue.
What's even funnier was Goonswarm holding Delve (i.e. the region with the most Dyspro/Prom) when the changes came :v
But no, totally biased decision purely to benefit Devswarm. Glad this guy's on the case! Imagine the damage he'll do once he realizes how to make market history go back farther than 5 days! |
|

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:13:00 -
[21] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Xpaulusx wrote:Hate to tell you, but the Tec problem existed ( concentration of moons in one region) long before Goons ever got deklien, in fact mittens even addressed the problem so don't blame goons blame CCP for the footdragging on this issue. What's even funnier was Goonswarm holding Delve (i.e. the region with the most Dyspro/Prom) when the changes came :v But no, totally biased decision purely to benefit Devswarm. Glad this guy's on the case! Imagine the damage he'll do once he realizes how to make market history go back farther than 5 days!
Look I admitted the mistake on the price. So go chill.... Again however that CCP Change wasnt the cause of that dip in price |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
602
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:17:00 -
[22] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:Look I admitted the mistake on the price. So go chill.... Again however that CCP Change wasnt the cause of that dip in price
Riiiight, Tech didn't drop from over 200k at one point to less than 80k today because of CCP's alchemy changes. Somehow this managed to happen even though most of the tech is actually in far fewer hands now than it was at its peak. Explain this to us, oh market wizard!
Edit: here's a fun thread for those of us not in the middle of a DEM GOONS conniption:
"Current SiSi T2 component usage make TECHNETIUM "the new dysprosium"
http://community.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1208383 |

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:19:00 -
[23] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:MilitantMan wrote:Look I admitted the mistake on the price. So go chill.... Again however that CCP Change wasnt the cause of that dip in price Riiiight, Tech didn't drop from over 200k at one point to less than 80k today because of CCP's alchemy changes. Somehow this managed to happen even though most of the tech is actually in far fewer hands now than it was at its peak. Explain this to us, oh market wizard!
Ah right so you are telling me that everyone managed to moon mine all those minerals and do the reactions, to such an amount in such a small time to cause that dip?
Please stop now before you do start to look a little silly now.. |

Jeremy Soikutsu
Homeworld Republic Intrepid Crossing
30
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:19:00 -
[24] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote: Say in your instance do you think any new alliances or even alliances that are 2 years old can ever stand up or compete with PL or CFC or HBC. Of course they cant and never will be able to.
To be fair that would and will be true without Tech given their numbers. You could argue that Tech gave them a lot of those numbers, but that would be suppositional and irrelevant at this point.
MilitantMan wrote:Look I admitted the mistake on the price. So go chill.... Again however that CCP Change wasnt the cause of that dip in price Except it was. |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
602
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:26:00 -
[25] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:Ah right so you are telling me that everyone managed to moon mine all those minerals and do the reactions, to such an amount in such a small time to cause that dip?
Please stop now before you do start to look a little silly now..
That's usually how these things happen. Nerf announced, people act accordingly. It's not like reactions are some kind of foreign thing, or that nobody was mining platinum or cobalt before this was announced.
Besides, you skipped the fundamental part of my question. If the drop in prices (not dip, drop, the drop has been happening pretty much since CCP Fozzie's devblog mid-July) was not caused by alchemy changes but instead by (insert your own batshit reason here), wouldn't that price be on its way back up now that most of the tech in the game is quite literally consolidated by one coalition? Especially one that would most definitely be fixing prices if it were at all able to? |

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:26:00 -
[26] - Quote
Jeremy Soikutsu wrote:MilitantMan wrote: Say in your instance do you think any new alliances or even alliances that are 2 years old can ever stand up or compete with PL or CFC or HBC. Of course they cant and never will be able to.
To be fair that would and will be true without Tech given their numbers. You could argue that Tech gave them a lot of those numbers, but that would be suppositional and irrelevant at this point. MilitantMan wrote:Look I admitted the mistake on the price. So go chill.... Again however that CCP Change wasnt the cause of that dip in price Except it was.
Ok well remember PL had lots of high end moons in Fountain, As fountain had a massive concentration of both dyspro and prom moons. That was a time both these made incredible ISK. Thats how PL made their money and managed to build a massive super/titan fleet. And yes of course they have grown a little also. This then allowed them to take as much of the tech moons as they wanted.
Not only did they take a ton of moons in low sec, but took all the 70 moons in Venal at one point. Again giving them a ridiculous income to create more and more caps.
i am not saying this a PLs fault, but there are fundamental issues with the mechanics of this game
and the second quote, again the price dropped in a matter of a couple of weeks, it would be impossible to moon mine such an amount to be produced via reactions in that time to make an impact on the market n just a couple of weeks. |

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:28:00 -
[27] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:MilitantMan wrote:Ah right so you are telling me that everyone managed to moon mine all those minerals and do the reactions, to such an amount in such a small time to cause that dip?
Please stop now before you do start to look a little silly now.. That's usually how these things happen. Nerf announced, people act accordingly. It's not like reactions are some kind of foreign thing, or that nobody was mining platinum or cobalt before this was announced. Besides, you skipped the fundamental part of my question. If the drop in prices (not dip, drop, the drop has been happening pretty much since CCP Fozzie's devblog mid-July) was not caused by alchemy changes but instead by (insert your own batshit reason here), wouldn't that price be on its way back up now that most of the tech in the game is quite literally consolidated by one coalition? Especially one that would most definitely be fixing prices if it were at all able to?
Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread
|

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:30:00 -
[28] - Quote
duble post |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
602
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:30:00 -
[29] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:and the second quote, again the price dropped in a matter of a couple of weeks, it would be impossible to moon mine such an amount to be produced via reactions in that time to make an impact on the market n just a couple of weeks.
Speculation caused the initial sharp decline (note: speculation caused by the alchemy nerf). It rose for a while once the Tribute War started (first step was attacking NCdot's Tech in Venal/Tribute, which naturally caused a drop in supply), but once that subsided (and actual alchemy no doubt kicked in), it started dropping again, and currently sits even lower than it was during that initial downwards slope.
|

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:36:00 -
[30] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:MilitantMan wrote:and the second quote, again the price dropped in a matter of a couple of weeks, it would be impossible to moon mine such an amount to be produced via reactions in that time to make an impact on the market n just a couple of weeks. Speculation caused the initial sharp decline (note: speculation caused by the alchemy nerf). It rose for a while once the Tribute War started (first step was attacking NCdot's Tech in Venal/Tribute, which naturally caused a drop in supply), but once that subsided (and actual alchemy no doubt kicked in), it started dropping again, and currently sits even lower than it was during that initial downwards slope.
Exactly, so the 'speculation' caused it, not by people actually producing anything to make it happen. Therefore the 'actual' change didnt cause that to happen. I doubt tbh its had that much impact even now.
It would be good to see the stats from CCP, however its still damn high, and I think the intended changes was supposed to have a much bigger impact. Like maybe bringing tech to 30K or something. Maybe I am wrong. But it would also be good to know what CCP expected the market price to drop to after this implementation. If they knew it was going to drop only a little then that didnt really solve the problem then did it.
|
|

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
602
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 18:47:00 -
[31] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:Exactly, so the 'speculation' caused it, not by people actually producing anything to make it happen. Therefore the 'actual' change didnt cause that to happen. I doubt tbh its had that much impact even now.
Speculation happens for a reason - people don't just decide to behave differently without new information to make them do that. If you look at the beginning of the slope, it's just past the midway point in July. CCP Fozzie's Tech devblog was July 19th. That's not really a coincidence.
If it was just speculation that was keeping the price low, wouldn't it be recovering by now, especially considering most of the tech is in one coalition's hands right now? It's now by-and-large in the hands of two former OTEC members, and the rather sizable spike in Tech prices pre-nerf is proof positive that they know how to operate a price cartel. So what gives? Why is tech still going down? "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
250
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 19:28:00 -
[32] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:
Exactly, so the 'speculation' caused it, not by people actually producing anything to make it happen. Therefore the 'actual' change didnt cause that to happen. I doubt tbh its had that much impact even now.
Listen, speculation did cause the initial downward pressure on Tech prices. The Northern conflict shortened supply so prices did rise, but in that time R32 alchemy did start to alleviate the supply shortfall. Now with the Northern conflict over and R32 alchemy in full swing, your supposition that alchemy is not having an impact on Tech prices is laughably naive at best, and an outright troll at worst.
"I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
524
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 19:36:00 -
[33] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote: Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread
Reported you for over abuse of the reporting function. Please HTFU. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Zombie Ninja Space Bears
73
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 19:45:00 -
[34] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:We have been forced to give swimming lessons to our accountants so that they dont drown in the money bin.
This made me think of Scrooge McDuck I agree with the following assessment of the Mining Barge Buff and as a reformed "Greed-fit", High-sec AFK miner, I think that is saying something. -áMining Barge buff: CCP has acknowledged that miners in general are too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Thomas Orca
Zero Fun Allowed
120
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 19:46:00 -
[35] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:
Exactly, so the 'speculation' caused it, not by people actually producing anything to make it happen. Therefore the 'actual' change didnt cause that to happen. I doubt tbh its had that much impact even now.
It would be good to see the stats from CCP, however its still damn high, and I think the intended changes was supposed to have a much bigger impact. Like maybe bringing tech to 30K or something. Maybe I am wrong. But it would also be good to know what CCP expected the market price to drop to after this implementation. If they knew it was going to drop only a little then that didnt really solve the problem then did it.
Speculation does not create slow and steady devaluation. |

Jeremy Soikutsu
Homeworld Republic Intrepid Crossing
30
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 19:49:00 -
[36] - Quote
Thomas Orca wrote:Speculation does not create slow and steady devaluation. This is clearly tantric speculation. |

Xercodo
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
1506
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 19:51:00 -
[37] - Quote
Does anyone else think MilitantMan looks like a bald Mittens? The Drake is a Lie |

Random Majere
Epsilon Lyr Nulli Secunda
39
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 19:56:00 -
[38] - Quote
Even with Tec, Goons are not invincible...we...well...we almost proved it!!...until the Falcon decloacked and.... well you know...  |

Ra'Shyne Viper
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 20:13:00 -
[39] - Quote
Goonswarm Online: Technetium |

No More Heroes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1708
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 20:24:00 -
[40] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:Also its just wrong, think about any new players coming into the game, will they ever ever hold a moon? of course not
They can always go out and scan the 160,000+ moons ingame and find the undiscovered, undocumented ones. You know- like the people who moan about tech in the north and wish that it rotated, depleted or revolved in some random manner.
. |
|

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
250
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 21:05:00 -
[41] - Quote
No More Heroes wrote:MilitantMan wrote:Also its just wrong, think about any new players coming into the game, will they ever ever hold a moon? of course not They can always go out and scan the 160,000+ moons ingame and find the undiscovered, undocumented ones. You know- like the people who moan about tech in the north and wish that it rotated, depleted or revolved in some random manner. Any idiot that wants moon mats to rotate, doesn't have the mental capacity to realize the unintended consequences of that happening.
"I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
16
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 21:42:00 -
[42] - Quote
Mortimer Civeri wrote:No More Heroes wrote:MilitantMan wrote:Also its just wrong, think about any new players coming into the game, will they ever ever hold a moon? of course not They can always go out and scan the 160,000+ moons ingame and find the undiscovered, undocumented ones. You know- like the people who moan about tech in the north and wish that it rotated, depleted or revolved in some random manner. Any idiot that wants moon mats to rotate, doesn't have the mental capacity to realize the unintended consequences of that happening.
care to explain what that is? |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
48
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 21:51:00 -
[43] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:Mortimer Civeri wrote:No More Heroes wrote:MilitantMan wrote:Also its just wrong, think about any new players coming into the game, will they ever ever hold a moon? of course not They can always go out and scan the 160,000+ moons ingame and find the undiscovered, undocumented ones. You know- like the people who moan about tech in the north and wish that it rotated, depleted or revolved in some random manner. Any idiot that wants moon mats to rotate, doesn't have the mental capacity to realize the unintended consequences of that happening. care to explain what that is? Probers can actually get paid for their work. Think of the profit loss! And all the explosions, the pretty pretty explosions. Sorry blinked out there thinking of what the wars would be like. |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
603
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 21:52:00 -
[44] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:care to explain what that is?
Ever scan a moon? It sucks. Scanning an entire system sucks even worse. Scanning an entire region should be banned by the Geneva Convention.
Having to re-scan entire regions every X amount of time would be torturous, and few would bother with it. The biggest advantage would no doubt be granted to the biggest groups of players (the ones that can afford to outsource the scanning to what few rank-and-file members are insane enough to want to), who would no doubt seek to grow even larger to cover that much more territory under their umbrella, either for maximising potential future moons (and/or denying them to others). The mechanic itself would also cause scarcity issues with moon minerals, so hoep u like high T2 prices!
tl;dr if you want to see even bigger blobs of people getting one day closer to quitting Eve forever while T2 prices skyrocket, support this idea. You may also want to look into getting your Grade 10.
"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Shadowschild
Black Lance Fidelas Constans
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 22:04:00 -
[45] - Quote
I just need to look back a little over a year ago, when sanctums & havens were moved to lower security space. Which effected everyone in null & some regions had conciderably more -7 & lower systems. They only have to extend that to technichium.
If you thought moving all those IHUBS & upgrades were a pain in the ass, imagine the logistical nightmare to come.
P.S. Scanning an entire system is boring as well, but whats worse? Finding an offline, anchored, large pos on something you can use. |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
259
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 22:18:00 -
[46] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:reported, your sad little angry comments are not needed...
What are you, the hall monitor?!? Fail better. |

Rath Kelbore
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
285
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 22:21:00 -
[47] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:MilitantMan wrote:care to explain what that is? Ever scan a moon? It sucks. Scanning an entire system sucks even worse. Scanning an entire region should be banned by the Geneva Convention. Having to re-scan entire regions every X amount of time would be torturous, and few would bother with it. The biggest advantage would no doubt be granted to the biggest groups of players (the ones that can afford to outsource the scanning to what few rank-and-file members are insane enough to want to), who would no doubt seek to grow even larger to cover that much more territory under their umbrella, either for maximising potential future moons (and/or denying them to others). The mechanic itself would also cause scarcity issues with moon minerals, so hoep u like high T2 prices! tl;dr if you want to see even bigger blobs of people getting one day closer to quitting Eve forever while T2 prices skyrocket, support this idea. You may also want to look into getting your Grade 10.
What if it only happened like once a year??
New profession: Cartography.
Possibly more fighting.
Probably would increase t2 prices a lot. Is that necessarily a bad thing?
Probing out a system is a pain, but I think you're exaggerating a tad. If a corp of say 10 people set about documenting a region of moons it can be done fairly quickly without anyone committing suicide. I mean some people actually mine, so whatever.
Just saying as an idea, I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss it.
Edit: You know I don't have my grade 10 Julian. I plan on living forever.......so far, so good. |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
603
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 22:36:00 -
[48] - Quote
Rath Kelbore wrote:Probing out a system is a pain, but I think you're exaggerating a tad. If a corp of say 10 people set about documenting a region of moons it can be done fairly quickly without anyone committing suicide. I mean some people actually mine, so whatever..
Have you ever done this? Serious question. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Rath Kelbore
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
285
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 22:41:00 -
[49] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Rath Kelbore wrote:Probing out a system is a pain, but I think you're exaggerating a tad. If a corp of say 10 people set about documenting a region of moons it can be done fairly quickly without anyone committing suicide. I mean some people actually mine, so whatever.. Have you ever done this? Serious question.
Yes sir.
Edit: Have you? I plan on living forever.......so far, so good. |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
603
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 22:45:00 -
[50] - Quote
Rath Kelbore wrote:Yes sir.
Edit: Have you?
An entire region? No, my eyes started to bleed after 3 systems. I just think you're severely exaggerating how quickly an entire region scan takes without an incredible amount of poopsocking. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |
|

Rath Kelbore
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
285
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 22:53:00 -
[51] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Rath Kelbore wrote:Yes sir.
Edit: Have you? An entire region? No, my eyes started to bleed after 3 systems. I just think you're severely exaggerating how quickly an entire region scan takes without an incredible amount of poopsocking.
Well if you can stand 3 systems and you have some friends who can also stand 3 systems................It's not so bad. That's the whole point isn't it. Working with a group of people to achieve a goal.
Alliances could pay (and possibly do idk) x amount per system scanned and documented. If resets or whatever happened sparingly enough, it might not be a bad idea is all. It was made to sound like a ridiculous idea due to the great effort required to scan down moons. I was just saying it's not THAT hard to do. I mean I wouldn't want moons changing every week, or month, or whatever but if it happened occasionally to shake things up, it might work. Worth taking a look at least.
Also, I've never scanned down an entire region by myself nor would I. If I implied that in my "yes" reply I didn't mean to. I plan on living forever.......so far, so good. |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
603
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 23:04:00 -
[52] - Quote
Rath Kelbore wrote:Well if you can stand 3 systems and you have some friends who can also stand 3 systems................It's not so bad. That's the whole point isn't it. Working with a group of people to achieve a goal.
Alliances could pay (and possibly do idk) x amount per system scanned and documented. .
Obviously no one person does it. That's why I said the entire system would swing even more in favour of larger blobs, as they can easily afford to not only pay a flat reward per scanned system, but they can have a far larger playerbase to get it done faster.
Besides, scanning's only one part of the hassle. Shifting towers around is far more annoying, and due to the nature of POS roles/etc, it can only be done by people with appropriate standings, as opposed to the large crowdsourced scanning. Even having to repeat that once a year is one time too many. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Rath Kelbore
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
285
|
Posted - 2012.11.28 23:31:00 -
[53] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Rath Kelbore wrote:Well if you can stand 3 systems and you have some friends who can also stand 3 systems................It's not so bad. That's the whole point isn't it. Working with a group of people to achieve a goal.
Alliances could pay (and possibly do idk) x amount per system scanned and documented. . Obviously no one person does it. That's why I said the entire system would swing even more in favour of larger blobs, as they can easily afford to not only pay a flat reward per scanned system, but they can have a far larger playerbase to get it done faster. Besides, scanning's only one part of the hassle. Shifting towers around is far more annoying, and due to the nature of POS roles/etc, it can only be done by people with appropriate standings, as opposed to the large crowdsourced scanning. Even having to repeat that once a year is one time too many.
I understand what your saying and I do agree that it would favor large groups.
In response to the second part, I don't think shifting towers around being a pita is enough of a downside to dismiss the idea.
A couple questions for you if you don't mind:
Do you think moons are fine they way they are now? If they need any sort of change, what thoughts do you have?
Do you think nullsec has become stagnant/static whatever. Is that a bad thing? Would changes to moons change anything in that regard???
Thank you in advance for your thoughts.
I plan on living forever.......so far, so good. |

fukier
Flatline.
173
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 00:13:00 -
[54] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:MilitantMan wrote:So its been a while since the CCP changes around producing tech. But nothings changed, Tech is still the same price.  I guess we better get used to goonswarm online then Nothings changed? When the alchemy changes went through Tech was selling just shy of 200k/unit, each moon making nearly 16 billion a month before fuel costs were considered. The current ppu of tech is UNDER 80k/unit. Your definition of "nothing" seems a bit off.
hmm indeed Daniel Jackson...
At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2027
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 00:23:00 -
[55] - Quote
MIrple wrote:Yes Goon busted their ass to conquer all the regions holding tech and maintain a logistical nightmare to reap these rewards but you should have it changed because your not them. GTFO and play something eles Wow. You almost have the whole thing in your mouth this time. 
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
18
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 11:00:00 -
[56] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:MilitantMan wrote:care to explain what that is? Ever scan a moon? It sucks. Scanning an entire system sucks even worse. Scanning an entire region should be banned by the Geneva Convention. Having to re-scan entire regions every X amount of time would be torturous, and few would bother with it. The biggest advantage would no doubt be granted to the biggest groups of players (the ones that can afford to outsource the scanning to what few rank-and-file members are insane enough to want to), who would no doubt seek to grow even larger to cover that much more territory under their umbrella, either for maximising potential future moons (and/or denying them to others). The mechanic itself would also cause scarcity issues with moon minerals, so hoep u like high T2 prices! tl;dr if you want to see even bigger blobs of people getting one day closer to quitting Eve forever while T2 prices skyrocket, support this idea. You may also want to look into getting your Grade 10.
So you are basically saying you are too lazy to go actually scan moons in order to generate billions per month? Seriously? It must be the easiest way to make ISK ever. I would gladly scan a region knowing i got a good chance to hit 10 moons or more that will give me a few hundred bill income a month...
|

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
605
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 11:27:00 -
[57] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:So you are basically saying you are too lazy to go actually scan moons in order to generate billions per month? Seriously? It must be the easiest way to make ISK ever. I would gladly scan a region knowing i got a good chance to hit 10 moons or more that will give me a few hundred bill income a month...
Well, there's plenty of undocumented and/or poorly documented areas. Go forth and scan, my friend! Apparently nothing but easy money aways you! "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
918
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 11:50:00 -
[58] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:MIrple wrote:Yes Goon busted their ass to conquer all the regions holding tech and maintain a logistical nightmare to reap these rewards but you should have it changed because your not them. GTFO and play something eles Wow. You almost have the whole thing in your mouth this time.  Bloody Null sec welfare program is all it is.
A top down system should have never entered the game in the first place. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

TheBlueMonkey
Don't Be a Menace
198
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 12:22:00 -
[59] - Quote
Posting in a "waaaa can't compete with goons, better join them, why are there only 4 power blocks!!" thread
 |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 12:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa
What this guy said.
+ you can get all the tech you want, you just need to fight for it, if you don't for whatever reason then it's not a CCP problem but yours.
|
|

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
547
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 12:35:00 -
[61] - Quote
goons and their activities and the imbalance with moon resources are two entirely separate issues
|

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
50
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 12:43:00 -
[62] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa What this guy said. + you can get all the tech you want, you just need to fight for it, if you don't for whatever reason then it's not a CCP problem but yours. Just to query, there is a realistic chance of this happening? Not one of those, assuming you get sufficiently large group of people things or the Goons decide to let you have it for a few months then take it all back over night? |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
918
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 12:45:00 -
[63] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa What this guy said. + you can get all the tech you want, you just need to fight for it, if you don't for whatever reason then it's not a CCP problem but yours. Frankly a really rubish answer -1
That is like saying that as Hi-sec has a better risk vs reward than Null all the pilots not getting rich from welfare payouts should just move to Null and not complain about Null being broken because the better payout with less risk is there for the taking.
As the crap risk vs reward is a broken mechanic just like tech and moon mining in general. Players should not live off corps (or CCP handouts) the corps should live because of the players. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 13:01:00 -
[64] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa What this guy said. + you can get all the tech you want, you just need to fight for it, if you don't for whatever reason then it's not a CCP problem but yours. Frankly a really rubish answer -1.
Thank you for your constructive appreciation, however I would like you to answer a couple questions, if you please:
1-who or what is making so you can't take over a couple of those tech moons and systems? *inability to attract players and recruit *inability to find decent reimbursement programs so your grunts don't have to take it all from their pockets to defend YOUR & YOUR FRIENDS tr+ál+ál+á wallet *inability to cooperate with other corporations, alliances without backstabbing each other
2-why should CCP handle your hand and give you for free what you can't afford?
3-what is preventing you from cooperation with those, despite getting spanked several times, are still over there and fight for their space? (props to these because fun playing it's better than forum crying about tech)
4-why do you need tech to live in null or have systems over there? |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 13:10:00 -
[65] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa What this guy said. + you can get all the tech you want, you just need to fight for it, if you don't for whatever reason then it's not a CCP problem but yours. Just to query, there is a realistic chance of this happening? Not one of those, assuming you get sufficiently large group of people things or the Goons decide to let you have it for a few months then take it all back over night?
Question Why CFC fleets just getting started are already full and guys moaning/yelling at FC's to create more slots/fleets?
I will not get in to boring details but I guess the simple fact of rewarding your grunts helps a little bit, you don't have to throw isk at their face but a proper, clean and decent reimbursement program will always and for years to come be the best attractive point to whatever player loving pvp.
Secondly I guess it's a matter of FC'ing too, and some FC's should simply remember they're playing pixels in space with people and not alone with bots, therefore some respect is required from these.
It is possible to fight back against those pesky players, just requires some guys dedication for a decent, proper, clean organisation and respect for their player members. Anyone liking pvp at least once a week will always show up if he knows he's defending his own in game interests on the short&long run, but don't expect them to be that interested if the only thing those are good for is to fill alliance leaders/fc's wallet to fly with over pimp ships and give lessons on how to make isk in eve.
Just an opinion.
|

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
918
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 13:23:00 -
[66] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Frankly a really rubish answer -1.
Thank you for your constructive appreciation, however I would like you to answer a couple questions, if you please: 1-who or what is making so you can't take over a couple of those tech moons and systems? *inability to attract players and recruit *inability to find decent reimbursement programs so your grunts don't have to take it all from their pockets to defend YOUR & YOUR FRIENDS tr+ál+ál+á wallet *inability to cooperate with other corporations, alliances without backstabbing each other I will answer the first bit for you. Just because there is a dole payment does not mean I want to be unemployed, just like here there is a welfare payment from CCP but I wouldn't want to be a blobber to have to get it.
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:2-why should CCP handle your hand and give you for free what you can't afford? Is that a question for me? As CCP seems to be giving the free hand outs to Null or have they suddenly put tech moons in lo-sec or wormholes?
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:3-what is preventing you from cooperation with those, despite getting spanked several times, are still over there and fight for their space? (props to these because fun playing it's better than forum crying about tech) Well besides blob warfare being 1 step above drooling, how about the fact that the welfare payouts have been so large that the alliance involved actually has enough cash to just throw thousands of ship away and just not care, while those without welfare must work for their cash.
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:4-why do you need tech to live in null or have systems over there? You mean besides a) why would you bother Null is broken or b) having an alliance with an inexhaustible number of ships requires that the conquest occur from the inside as no one will now conquer them externally, thank you welfare. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Emperors Bride
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 13:31:00 -
[67] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa What this guy said. + you can get all the tech you want, you just need to fight for it, if you don't for whatever reason then it's not a CCP problem but yours. Just to query, there is a realistic chance of this happening? Not one of those, assuming you get sufficiently large group of people things or the Goons decide to let you have it for a few months then take it all back over night?
Goons didn't take their space in the first place. It was a gift from another alliance. If you think about it, Goons haven't beaten a large alliance in EVE using space ships... ever. It's always about meta gaming them, or some other form of meta gaming that they had no part in but took benefits from.
As for tech, it has dropped. 60K was the lowest Tech ever was. It's at 79 now. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 13:53:00 -
[68] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I will answer the first bit for you. Just because there is a dole payment does not mean I want to be unemployed, just like here there is a welfare payment from CCP but I wouldn't want to be a blobber to have to get it.
Is that a question for me? As CCP seems to be giving the free hand outs to Null or have they suddenly put tech moons in lo-sec or wormholes?
I'll answer to you the obvious to this first part, it's a choice you made by yourself, therefore that choice has consequences and you have to assume them. But I understand it's far easier to call it "blobber warfare".
Now, I've got good news for you: there is tech in low sec but not in wh's. You can therefore fight for low sec tech without being a blobber, but once again it's your choice, no one is or will take decisions for you nor is or will assume consequences for you.
The choice is there, you either take it or leave it. I'm not saying tech as it is implemented is the best way to do it, hell no, goons were the first ones to claim this for years and were joked about by those crying today. But first things first, no one complained up until now, so where's the real problem? -tech, those holding it, those unable to take it back/get it or simply the way null sec mechanics are made of? It's not players fault for playing the game the way it's intended, but it's players fault for not using or being unable to use the same in game tools to succeed, and I guess this is the point where we disagree.
The fact there needs to be something worth to fight for in null is undeniable, the way and what, that is another discussion way beyond my or your gaming knowledge but we can and should have an opinion about this, however point fingers at players playing the game the way it's intended it's calling the bad target.
I think I've answered completely to your different statements and think I'm being constructive/polite, but please be my guest to correct me if I'm wrong. |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
919
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 14:01:00 -
[69] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I will answer the first bit for you. Just because there is a dole payment does not mean I want to be unemployed, just like here there is a welfare payment from CCP but I wouldn't want to be a blobber to have to get it.
Is that a question for me? As CCP seems to be giving the free hand outs to Null or have they suddenly put tech moons in lo-sec or wormholes? I'll answer to you the obvious to this first part, it's a choice you made by yourself, therefore that choice has consequences and you have to assume them. But I understand it's far easier to call it "blobber warfare". Now, I've got good news for you: there is tech in low sec but not in wh's. You can therefore fight for low sec tech without being a blobber, but once again it's your choice, no one is or will take decisions for you nor is or will assume consequences for you. The choice is there, you either take it or leave it. I'm not saying tech as it is implemented is the best way to do it, hell no, goons were the first ones to claim this for years and were joked about by those crying today. But first things first, no one complained up until now, so where's the real problem? -tech, those holding it, those unable to take it back/get it or simply the way null sec mechanics are made of? It's not players fault for playing the game the way it's intended, but it's players fault for not using or being unable to use the same in game tools to succeed, and I guess this is the point where we disagree. The fact there needs to be something worth to fight for in null is undeniable, the way and what, that is another discussion way beyond my or your gaming knowledge but we can and should have an opinion about this, however point fingers at players playing the game the way it's intended it's calling the bad target. I think I've answered completely to your different statements and think I'm being constructive/polite, but please be my guest to correct me if I'm wrong. Ok out of all that the thing I will answer is that a lot of people have complained about tech before now or did CCP bring in alchemy out of the goodness of its heart.. Oh and just to point out how wrong you are about that Goonswarm has actually been complaining about it since before it was introduced.
As to lo-sec, what system is it in?
Yes goonswarm are taking advantage, that is just human nature but that still does not make it any less of a crappy mechanic. As I said it is CCP sponsored welfare for Null. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

MilitantMan
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
19
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 14:06:00 -
[70] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa What this guy said. + you can get all the tech you want, you just need to fight for it, if you don't for whatever reason then it's not a CCP problem but yours. Frankly a really rubish answer -1. Thank you for your constructive appreciation, however I would like you to answer a couple questions, if you please: 1-who or what is making so you can't take over a couple of those tech moons and systems? *inability to attract players and recruit *inability to find decent reimbursement programs so your grunts don't have to take it all from their pockets to defend YOUR & YOUR FRIENDS tr+ál+ál+á wallet *inability to cooperate with other corporations, alliances without backstabbing each other 2-why should CCP handle your hand and give you for free what you can't afford? 3-what is preventing you from cooperation with those, despite getting spanked several times, are still over there and fight for their space? (props to these because fun playing it's better than forum crying about tech) 4-why do you need tech to live in null or have systems over there?
Are you serious? Even the might of NC. Evoke, Black Legion and Nulli (which I may add are LONG TERM major pvp alliances) COULD NOT STOP CFC taking all the tech moons and tribute and vale. So please stop spouting complete and utter trash. Im sorry but quotes like this seriously annoy me.
|
|

Ghazu
308
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 14:14:00 -
[71] - Quote
Lol read this guys http://evenews24.com/2012/11/28/dear-ccp-a-bitter-vets-christmas-wish-list/ http://www.minerbumping.com/ |

Mai Khumm
Homeworld Republic Intrepid Crossing
314
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 14:16:00 -
[72] - Quote
Nothing has and nothing will change...
Welcome to Goonswarm Online: Your **** is ours... Since EVE will be pay to win very soon. --> 65 Mil SP subcap pilot/45 Mil SP Caldari-Indy Cap pilot looking for Powerbloc Coalition... |

Xpaulusx
Naari LLC
108
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 14:18:00 -
[73] - Quote
Emperors Bride wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa What this guy said. + you can get all the tech you want, you just need to fight for it, if you don't for whatever reason then it's not a CCP problem but yours. Just to query, there is a realistic chance of this happening? Not one of those, assuming you get sufficiently large group of people things or the Goons decide to let you have it for a few months then take it all back over night? Goons didn't take their space in the first place. It was a gift from another alliance. If you think about it, Goons haven't beaten a large alliance in EVE using space ships... ever. It's always about meta gaming them, or some other form of meta gaming that they had no part in but took benefits from. As for tech, it has dropped. 60K was the lowest Tech ever was. It's at 79 now.
Yes, Goons were gifted Deklien, but in all fairness they reciprocated, Razor, FA, & others got space & Tec moons of their own after space was taken not as renters but as co-allies, not bad at all compared to others in the past. Gotta give them atleat some credit. New Player retention is important to our community. |

TheBlueMonkey
Don't Be a Menace
201
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 14:19:00 -
[74] - Quote
Emperors Bride wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa What this guy said. + you can get all the tech you want, you just need to fight for it, if you don't for whatever reason then it's not a CCP problem but yours. Just to query, there is a realistic chance of this happening? Not one of those, assuming you get sufficiently large group of people things or the Goons decide to let you have it for a few months then take it all back over night? Goons didn't take their space in the first place. It was a gift from another alliance. If you think about it, Goons haven't beaten a large alliance in EVE using space ships... ever. It's always about meta gaming them, or some other form of meta gaming that they had no part in but took benefits from. As for tech, it has dropped. 60K was the lowest Tech ever was. It's at 79 now.
You know a lot of eve is about the meta game right?
The single biggest advantage a new player can possibly get is knowing the right people from the start.
You can buy a 100mil sp character, read all the guides you can find, buy isk, fly the most expensive ships out there and nothing will amount the advantage that just knowing 1 or 2 people in the right places will give you. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 14:37:00 -
[75] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Oh and just to point out how wrong you are about that Goonswarm has actually been complaining about it since before it was introduced.
As to lo-sec, what system is it in?
So, to get back on the track, the problem is Goonswarm, CFC, PL, NC, EVOKE etc or game mechanic? -we're getting to the point you'll finally admit it's the game mechanic, the fact CFC works and get their objectives is by no means game exploit but intended game play. Now what about changing this sterile discussion in to something more positive like providing feedback to CCP on dedicated thread so they can figure out what and how implement something worth to fight for?
As for low sec: schhhh I know a couple of these but if I tell you I have to kill you 
-a little scan of systems under -3 will provide you all the information you need, I know it's tedious as hell but you can also check it out with Dotland |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
920
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 14:43:00 -
[76] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Oh and just to point out how wrong you are about that Goonswarm has actually been complaining about it since before it was introduced.
As to lo-sec, what system is it in? So, to get back on the track, the problem is Goonswarm, CFC, PL, NC, EVOKE etc or game mechanic? -we're getting to the point you'll finally admit it's the game mechanic, the fact CFC works and get their objectives is by no means game exploit but intended game play. Now what about changing this sterile discussion in to something more positive like providing feedback to CCP on dedicated thread so they can figure out what and how implement something worth to fight for? As for low sec: schhhh I know a couple of these but if I tell you I have to kill you  -a little scan of systems under -3 will provide you all the information you need, I know it's tedious as hell but you can also check it out with Dotland Ok scratch head time
I have always said it is a CCP welfare program for Null.
I missed anywhere, where I said CFC, PL, NC ect.. were the problem.
The mechanic has created a problem in allowing Goonswarm to become so rich that losses in a war will only ever matter on a moral side and not a financial side.
As to the solution well mine personally is get rid of moon mining, I don't like passive income that players only have to assist every few weeks or top down financing for corporations.
I used to like the idea of ring mining as a multiplayer required mining op, but now that seems to have developed into a gun mining fiasco..Incursion style. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Rordan D'Kherr
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
221
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 15:05:00 -
[77] - Quote
Looks like we need to re-define Godwin's law:
"As an GD discussion grows longer, the probability of a 'blame Goons'-post approaches one."
btw @OP: first get your facts, then post  _______________________________________ Don't be scared, because being afk is not a crime. |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
920
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 15:12:00 -
[78] - Quote
retracted
above made more sense after you edited it. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

iskflakes
Magnets Inc.
104
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 15:20:00 -
[79] - Quote
Tech should be distributed equally until a new production model which doesn't have such a huge bottleneck is created. |

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
515
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 15:43:00 -
[80] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa What this guy said. + you can get all the tech you want, you just need to fight for it, if you don't for whatever reason then it's not a CCP problem but yours. Just to query, there is a realistic chance of this happening? Not one of those, assuming you get sufficiently large group of people things or the Goons decide to let you have it for a few months then take it all back over night? Where did you get this idea that null sec ISN'T bout groups as large as the GSF? The CFC isn'g GSF, entire alliances made up of individual corps need to maintain working relationships in order for the CFC or any coalition to survive; that's PLAYERS WORKING TOGETHER IN NULL SEC.
Your ****** little corp, a part of just as crappy and little an alliance, isn't an EMPIRE. CCP states null as being the place were PLAYERS build EMPIRES. Not guild housing.
The problem isn't mechanics, it's rediculous player expectation. If you think that null sec is there for little groups of people to "fight" their way into control of space, then you're doing it wrong.
Null sec is supposed to mirror NPC contoled high sec, but run by the players. CCP didn't make it possible to rercuit thousands of people into a single corp, and then connect that corp to multiple other corp of thousands of people so that a few dozen can do what several thousand can.
Stupidity apparently has no limit, because I see people crying about other people doing exactly what CCP wants them to do. If that's not stupid, then I'm to stupid to know what stupid is.
|
|

Desert Ice78
Cobra Kai Dojo WHY so Seri0Us
176
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 17:27:00 -
[81] - Quote
Disband Goonswar......
Wait, what? I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg
CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused. |

No More Heroes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1713
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 17:35:00 -
[82] - Quote
Emperors Bride wrote:If you think about it, Goons haven't beaten a large alliance in EVE using space ships... ever
We just did.
Tribute is yellow now, not blue- quite a remarkable change; and it was a battle. I was in almost every single one of those fleets. That region was taken by blood and thunder.
. |

Megadon
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 18:53:00 -
[83] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Nerf goons thread # blahblahblahblahnerfgoonsblahblahblahwaaaaaaaaaaa What this guy said. + you can get all the tech you want, you just need to fight for it, if you don't for whatever reason then it's not a CCP problem but yours. Just to query, there is a realistic chance of this happening? Not one of those, assuming you get sufficiently large group of people things or the Goons decide to let you have it for a few months then take it all back over night? Where did you get this idea that null sec ISN'T bout groups as large as the GSF? The CFC isn'g GSF, entire alliances made up of individual corps need to maintain working relationships in order for the CFC or any coalition to survive; that's PLAYERS WORKING TOGETHER IN NULL SEC. Your ****** little corp, a part of just as crappy and little an alliance, isn't an EMPIRE. CCP states null as being the place were PLAYERS build EMPIRES. Not guild housing. The problem isn't mechanics, it's rediculous player expectation. If you think that null sec is there for little groups of people to "fight" their way into control of space, then you're doing it wrong. Null sec is supposed to mirror NPC contoled high sec, but run by the players. CCP didn't make it possible to rercuit thousands of people into a single corp, and then connect that corp to multiple other corp of thousands of people so that a few dozen can do what several thousand can. Stupidity apparently has no limit, because I see people crying about other people doing exactly what CCP wants them to do. If that's not stupid, then I'm to stupid to know what stupid is.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
2988
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 15:21:00 -
[84] - Quote
Quote: Goon, YOU'RE WRONG, AND SO IS CCP. In the next few days, after 7 years of EVE in every sector from 1.0 to 0.0, this account and two others of players that started EVE with me in 2005 -2006 will cease to exist as paying accounts BECAUSE THERE IS NO "GAME" in EVE. The economic model that GIVES the game to the "monoliths" is what is "stupid", not the new subscribers that come to EVE expecting a game mechanism that allows them to participate. Until that is rectified, there will be no more money from these 3 accounts for EVE. Now please respond (as you predictably will) by flaming me "GTFO".... the only thing your attitude and CCP's has achieved is 3 fewer paying subs.
Nothing is given to anyone. The Goons took what they own from other people who had taken it from yet more. Goons are not the first superpower of this game and wont be the last. |

Holy One
304
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 15:47:00 -
[85] - Quote
No More Heroes wrote:Emperors Bride wrote:If you think about it, Goons haven't beaten a large alliance in EVE using space ships... ever We just did. Tribute is yellow now, not blue- quite a remarkable change; and it was a battle. I was in almost every single one of those fleets. That region was taken by blood and F1.
Fixed that for you brosef. |

Shadowschild
Black Lance Fidelas Constans
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 15:48:00 -
[86] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Quote: Goon, YOU'RE WRONG, AND SO IS CCP. In the next few days, after 7 years of EVE in every sector from 1.0 to 0.0, this account and two others of players that started EVE with me in 2005 -2006 will cease to exist as paying accounts BECAUSE THERE IS NO "GAME" in EVE. The economic model that GIVES the game to the "monoliths" is what is "stupid", not the new subscribers that come to EVE expecting a game mechanism that allows them to participate. Until that is rectified, there will be no more money from these 3 accounts for EVE. Now please respond (as you predictably will) by flaming me "GTFO".... the only thing your attitude and CCP's has achieved is 3 fewer paying subs.
Nothing is given to anyone. The Goons took what they own from other people who had taken it from yet more. Goons are not the first superpower of this game and wont be the last.
There comes a point in every online game where a big fish forms in the pond. If they added a new region every few expansions & do something usefull with all those -0.4 to -0.1 systems it would help. I watch every day at work as the most common sense solutions are ignored for months at a time & then suddenly someone up above gets it.
Laughable |

Bamfordi
Koshaku Gentlemen's Agreement
4
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 15:50:00 -
[87] - Quote
Holy One wrote:No More Heroes wrote:Emperors Bride wrote:If you think about it, Goons haven't beaten a large alliance in EVE using space ships... ever We just did. Tribute is yellow now, not blue- quite a remarkable change; and it was a battle. I was in almost every single one of those fleets. That region was taken by blood and F1. Fixed that for you brosef.
You have to hit F1 in fleets? thats where i've been going wrong |

baltec1
Bat Country
2988
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 15:52:00 -
[88] - Quote
Quote:
There comes a point in every online game where a big fish forms in the pond. If they added a new region every few expansions it would help.
Having fought and seen the destruction of at least four of the most powerful empires in our history and a score of others I have to say that today is no different than back then. |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
316
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 16:16:00 -
[89] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Quote:
There comes a point in every online game where a big fish forms in the pond. If they added a new region every few expansions it would help.
Having fought and seen the destruction of at least four of the most powerful empires in our history and a score of others I have to say that today is no different than back then.
Yep. More of the same. Technetium - Nothing Changed From Inside POS AoE doomsdays to Tech. They don't make changed until the 'damage' is done.
Most MMO's it is about big fish but in EVE it was more about last man standing. |

Sarmea Moon
Universal Freelance CONSORTIUM UNIVERSALIS
70
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 16:21:00 -
[90] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:
Who said I was mad? Im just stating facts, I am perfectly calm, and actually i agree with you.
Also its just wrong, think about any new players coming into the game, will they ever ever hold a moon? of course not. Say in your instance do you think any new alliances or even alliances that are 2 years old can ever stand up or compete with PL or CFC or HBC. Of course they cant and never will be able to.
Sadly eve is becoming controlled by a few coalitions, is this really the way eve should be going? Chinese server perhaps?
How can they ever compete? You're joking right? PL didn't always own fountain. I've held fountain as part of 3 alliances, and we lost it every time (I admit it, I'm a baddie). We lost it to BoB, we lost it to PL, and we took it from BoB while they were dirtnapping/failcascading when I was in Bruce. People didn't think BoB could take ASCN's industrial might, and ASCN had more players- yet they were annihilated.
Those same newbie Goonies came to Big Blue's aid when the Merc Coalition hired by BoB took us out- I personally built a few thousand frigates in Geminate so they'd have something they had the skills to fly (took them about a week to get all their JCs there). That would be the same Goons who now control so much. Remember the angry bees? Flying insane frig and cruiser fleets because they were too low skilled to be able to fly anything bigger? Guess not. I do:P The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse [lady of commercial virtue]. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.- James Nicoll |
|

Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
375
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 16:22:00 -
[91] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:Snow Axe wrote:MilitantMan wrote:care to explain what that is? Ever scan a moon? It sucks. Scanning an entire system sucks even worse. Scanning an entire region should be banned by the Geneva Convention. Having to re-scan entire regions every X amount of time would be torturous, and few would bother with it. The biggest advantage would no doubt be granted to the biggest groups of players (the ones that can afford to outsource the scanning to what few rank-and-file members are insane enough to want to), who would no doubt seek to grow even larger to cover that much more territory under their umbrella, either for maximising potential future moons (and/or denying them to others). The mechanic itself would also cause scarcity issues with moon minerals, so hoep u like high T2 prices! tl;dr if you want to see even bigger blobs of people getting one day closer to quitting Eve forever while T2 prices skyrocket, support this idea. You may also want to look into getting your Grade 10. So you are basically saying you are too lazy to go actually scan moons in order to generate billions per month? Seriously? It must be the easiest way to make ISK ever. I would gladly scan a region knowing i got a good chance to hit 10 moons or more that will give me a few hundred bill income a month...
Sadly its not finding the moon that makes isk, its puting the tower on it and keeping it there. So you might find a moon but within a couple of days my esteemed friends in goonswarm who are simply d-scanning for moon miners rather than scanning every moon will have found your honey pot and taken it off you without even thanking you for finding it for them.
|

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
1085
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 16:23:00 -
[92] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:MilitantMan wrote:So its been a while since the CCP changes around producing tech. But nothings changed, Tech is still the same price.  I guess we better get used to goonswarm online then Nothings changed? When the alchemy changes went through Tech was selling just shy of 200k/unit, each moon making nearly 16 billion a month before fuel costs were considered. The current ppu of tech is UNDER 80k/unit. Your definition of "nothing" seems a bit off.
Quoting to help special people. Also with alchemy you can make your own plat-tech. If that is even to hard for you then I have no more suggestions. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2988
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 16:25:00 -
[93] - Quote
Ocih wrote:baltec1 wrote:Quote:
There comes a point in every online game where a big fish forms in the pond. If they added a new region every few expansions it would help.
Having fought and seen the destruction of at least four of the most powerful empires in our history and a score of others I have to say that today is no different than back then. Yep. More of the same. Technetium - Nothing Changed From Inside POS AoE doomsdays to Tech. They don't make changed until the 'damage' is done. Most MMO's it is about big fish but in EVE it was more about last man standing. And yet, none of that stuff stopped a small band of terrorists from not only holding venal but attacking them whenever we wanted for years. |

No More Heroes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1717
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 16:54:00 -
[94] - Quote
Holy One wrote:No More Heroes wrote:Emperors Bride wrote:If you think about it, Goons haven't beaten a large alliance in EVE using space ships... ever We just did. Tribute is yellow now, not blue- quite a remarkable change; and it was a battle. I was in almost every single one of those fleets. That region was taken by blood and F1. Fixed that for you brosef.
Sometimes I gotta overload my hardeners too. So thats two key commands  . |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
316
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 17:01:00 -
[95] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Ocih wrote:baltec1 wrote:Quote:
There comes a point in every online game where a big fish forms in the pond. If they added a new region every few expansions it would help.
Having fought and seen the destruction of at least four of the most powerful empires in our history and a score of others I have to say that today is no different than back then. Yep. More of the same. Technetium - Nothing Changed From Inside POS AoE doomsdays to Tech. They don't make changed until the 'damage' is done. Most MMO's it is about big fish but in EVE it was more about last man standing. And yet, none of that stuff stopped a small band of terrorists from not only holding venal but attacking them whenever we wanted for years.
Lets be real, you guys were never "A small band of terrorists" even if you pretended to be. Not to say it wasn't smart to let people underestimate you when the time was right. Those days are gone now though. |

Qin Tawate
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 17:13:00 -
[96] - Quote
MIrple wrote:Yes Goon busted their ass to conquer all the regions holding tech and maintain a logistical nightmare to reap these rewards but you should have it changed because your not them. GTFO and play something eles
Let me release you from that pain. I buy every one of these worthless, garbage, so hard to maintain Tech moons from you for 1 ISK each.
Deal?
|

baltec1
Bat Country
2989
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 17:14:00 -
[97] - Quote
Ocih wrote:
Lets be real, you guys were never "A small band of terrorists" even if you pretended to be.
We wernt always Goons |

Sarmea Moon
Universal Freelance CONSORTIUM UNIVERSALIS
70
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 17:24:00 -
[98] - Quote
Ocih wrote:
Lets be real, you guys were never "A small band of terrorists" even if you pretended to be. Not to say it wasn't smart to let people underestimate you when the time was right. Those days are gone now though.
I must have been dreaming when BoB beat the living snot out of the Goons and they quit for a time, over something to do with mocking a dead player, when Molle famously declared that there will never be an EvE where Goons would be allowed to build back up. There wasn't any pretending there, it certainly looked like a massacre. They came back with better, more focused leadership than they'd had before, and a BoB director who wanted to have some fun. Whether they would be where they are today if that director hadn't helped is anyone's guess.
The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse [lady of commercial virtue]. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.- James Nicoll |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
316
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 17:45:00 -
[99] - Quote
Sarmea Moon wrote:Ocih wrote:
Lets be real, you guys were never "A small band of terrorists" even if you pretended to be. Not to say it wasn't smart to let people underestimate you when the time was right. Those days are gone now though.
I must have been dreaming when BoB beat the living snot out of the Goons and they quit for a time, over something to do with mocking a dead player, when Molle famously declared that there will never be an EvE where Goons would be allowed to build back up. There wasn't any pretending there, it certainly looked like a massacre. They came back with better, more focused leadership than they'd had before, and a BoB director who wanted to have some fun. Whether they would be where they are today if that director hadn't helped is anyone's guess.
The way I heard it, they left because of a corp thief. They get curb stomped to this day in battles. It happens. You don't need to defend goons. I don't hate on them. I look at what they are doing, what anyone is doing and decide if I like the action. Discussions get dragged down in to the mud when we turn it in to hate goons or hate -A- or hate BoB. It's derailment, maybe not intentional but effective.
I don't agree with the bottle necks in EVE. Be it T2 salvage, be it Uedama, be it Technetium or LP store Insignia's. I don't find they create conflict. I find they create monopolies. I don't think that is the objective in EVE. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
964
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 18:35:00 -
[100] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:MIrple wrote:Yes Goon busted their ass to conquer all the regions holding tech and maintain a logistical nightmare to reap these rewards but you should have it changed because your not them. GTFO and play something eles Wow. You almost have the whole thing in your mouth this time. 
Still waiting on that writeup from you about how NCdot beat the northern coalition through the power of small gangs instead of blueing up every russian they could find that bore a grudge. |
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1811
|
Posted - 2012.12.01 03:55:00 -
[101] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:MIrple wrote:Yes Goon busted their ass to conquer all the regions holding tech and maintain a logistical nightmare to reap these rewards but you should have it changed because your not them. GTFO and play something eles Wow. You almost have the whole thing in your mouth this time.  Still waiting on that writeup from you about how NCdot beat the northern coalition through the power of small gangs instead of blueing up every russian they could find that bore a grudge. I love blueing people. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Polly Oxford
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.12.01 04:12:00 -
[102] - Quote
MilitantMan wrote:
Also its just wrong, think about any new players coming into the game, will they ever ever hold a moon? of course not. Say in your instance do you think any new alliances or even alliances that are 2 years old can ever stand up or compete with PL or CFC or HBC. Of course they cant and never will be able to.
I'm not gonna bother reading the whole thread, but this made me laugh out loud. You realize that TEST is only 2 years old, right? |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1811
|
Posted - 2012.12.01 04:39:00 -
[103] - Quote
Polly Oxford wrote:MilitantMan wrote:Also its just wrong, think about any new players coming into the game, will they ever ever hold a moon? of course not. Say in your instance do you think any new alliances or even alliances that are 2 years old can ever stand up or compete with PL or CFC or HBC. Of course they cant and never will be able to. I'm not gonna bother reading the whole thread, but this made me laugh out loud. You realize that TEST is only 2 years old, right? TEST youngster, please ignore (the structure mails as they take your sov) Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |