| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
I am quoting from a different thread as it is evident there is a lack of understanding regarding how Concord is being exploited at this point in time.
"It is INTENDED game mechanics that a -10 player can enter highsec if he choses. He has to suffer the fact that anyone and everyone can shoot him, and the faction police will spawn within about 3 seconds, wherever he goes.
Where is the exploit? Did he a) Find a way to stop you pointing his ship? b) Find a way to stop you shooting his ship? c) Find a way to stop CONCORD from destroying his ship? d) Find a way to evade the faction police indefinitely?
Please post the exact exploit, please.
Them being a "bad man" is not an exploit, FYI."
The exploit is attracting Concord to a location away from where they are not wanted, in other words, to make them take that little bit longer to spawn. It's all very well documented by the "we will stop ice-mining in highsec" plan. Goonswarm have made it very clear how this all works, perhaps to attract a fix to it by CCP.
Saying that I said anything other than me calling it an exploit is just post-padding and fishing for tears which are not there. I said it is an exploit being used, not that you cannot enter Highsec if you have very low sec status, not that you shouldn't be able to kill whoever in highsec. Doing so with impunity, knowing you stand a very good chance of getting away with it cleanly. Clearly that is an exploit.
You can be as bad as you want to be, I never suggested any restrictions on that or anything else. Looking at the way the majority of current ice-miner ganking is being done - it is an exploit.
The door is not real. |

Ifly Uwalk
Concentrated Evil
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Evading CONCORD - sploit. Delaying CONCORD - not a sploit.
Endof.
|

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
78
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
I thought this was about Concord grapes being exploited to make jelly.
Mmmmm.... jelly...
AFK, lunch... Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
More drivel. End yourself and do us all a favour. |

Simetraz
State War Academy Caldari State
77
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
If it is a exploit you are not aloud to discuss it on the forums. If you believe it is a exploit you should fill out a petition with CCP and see above. If you are just trolling, carry on.
Capitals (Balancing and Roles) |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
Simetraz wrote:If it is a exploit you are not aloud to discuss it on the forums. If you believe it is a exploit you should fill out a petition with CCP and see above. If you are just trolling, carry on.
Good point - discussion of "exploits" is bannable mmmm? At the very least the post gets heavily edited.
/me sits back and waits for nothing to happen to OPs post 
|

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery Situation: Normal
54
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:49:00 -
[7] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:The exploit is attracting Concord to a location away from where they are not wanted, in other words, to make them take that little bit longer to spawn. It's all very well documented by the "we will stop ice-mining in highsec" plan. Goonswarm have made it very clear how this all works, perhaps to attract a fix to it by CCP.
This is wrong.
All that happens when you move CONCORD away, is you reset them back to their normal respawn time, based on the sec level. You do not extend it past the point where it should be.
What should be ab exploit, is using throwaway alts to "spawn" CONCORD in the first place, to try to force CONCORD reaction times to be shorter than their intended level for the sec status of the system. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ifly Uwalk wrote:Evading CONCORD - sploit. Delaying CONCORD - not a sploit.
Endof.
Yep... if you pull concord and it kills you, there is no exploit involved. It is one tactic to delay concord. Some miners use this same tactic to pull concord back to ice field. It is no exploit either. It is their counter tactic for goony tactic and is working well as far I've seen.
Remember to clean your wrecks though because spamming excessive amounts of those is an exploit. Also excessive character recycling is a exploit, so rather use same -10sec toon all the time and resupply ships to him with an alt.
Nuff said. Forum fix for firefox and chrome Get working images and colored text Classic forum style 2.25final |

Kitty McKitty
In Praise Of Shadows
287
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
Miners use this technique to put concord on grid in the belief it improves their survivability from ganks, which it doesnt, used to be deemed an exploit but has since been confused by inconsistent GM petittion responses to the point it is no longer regarded an exploit and miners happily do so.
Conversely, for a criminal to use this to draw the same Concord out of the belt would require them going GCC anyway so it is simply a criminal being shot for GCC, duh. GÖÑ Haviing your portrait painted here helps INTAKI Disabled Children GÖÑ |

Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:51:00 -
[10] - Quote
Othran wrote:More drivel. End yourself and do us all a favour.
Touched a nerve, have I ?
One should not comment about how code is being exploited ingame, because that will ruin your gameplay...... If I end myself, will you come with me ? Your tears are delicious. Stop reading my posts if my drivel upsets you so much. The door is not real. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
270
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:53:00 -
[11] - Quote
prepping the system only needs to be done once a day and is now usually done by dumb miners trying to protect themselves |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
270
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:54:00 -
[12] - Quote
not sure you're going to have much luck with your "spawning concord for the first time that day is an exploit" argument |

Jokerface666
Ever Flow Northern Coalition.
32
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
In reallife its the same, if theres a murder and anotherone 10 mins later it'll take the police longer to get to the second. kindof...
No esploit. ------------------------------w00t w00t rapetrain------------------------------ |

Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:54:00 -
[14] - Quote
Kitty McKitty wrote:Miners use this technique to put concord on grid in the belief it improves their survivability from ganks, which it doesnt, used to be deemed an exploit but has since been confused by inconsistent GM petittion responses to the point it is no longer regarded an exploit and miners happily do so.
Conversely, for a criminal to use this to draw the same Concord out of the belt would require them going GCC anyway so it is simply a criminal being shot for GCC, duh.
Well then, if miners do it, it's still wrong and if this is true then they truly have brought this down onto themselves. Anyone doing that should be punished, an exploit is an exploit, it doesn't matter who does it or where.
The door is not real. |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:54:00 -
[15] - Quote
Grey Stormshadow wrote:[quote=Ifly Uwalk]Evading CONCORD - sploit. Also excessive character recycling is a exploit, so rather use same -10sec toon all the time and resupply ships to him with an alt. Nuff said.
Any character recycling if its been suicide ganking is an exploit. You are supposed to keep it for at least 3 months* after the last aggression of any sort.
Then you're OK to recycle it.
Anything less and if you're petitioned then you get the banstick.
*this was considered a "suitable time to wait for recycling" in 2009. Gods only know now. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
270
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:56:00 -
[16] - Quote
its hilarious how little you understand concord and how nonsensical your argument is once you do |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:57:00 -
[17] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:Othran wrote:More drivel. End yourself and do us all a favour. Touched a nerve, have I ? One should not comment about how code is being exploited ingame, because that will ruin your gameplay...... If I end myself, will you come with me ? Your tears are delicious. Stop reading my posts if my drivel upsets you so much.
I've never suicide ganked anyone - seems boring to me. However I will defend the right of people to do so - there's plenty means of defence apart from Concord.
Anyway as I said, if your OP gets edited by mods then its an exploit. If it doesn't its utter drivel.
I'm betting on utter drivel. |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
Othran wrote:Grey Stormshadow wrote:Ifly Uwalk wrote:Evading CONCORD - sploit. Also excessive character recycling is a exploit, so rather use same -10sec toon all the time and resupply ships to him with an alt. Nuff said. Any character recycling if its been suicide ganking is an exploit. You are supposed to keep it for at least 3 months* after the last aggression of any sort. Then you're OK to recycle it. Anything less and if you're petitioned then you get the banstick. *this was considered a "suitable time to wait for recycling" in 2009. Gods only know now.
GM Karidor wrote: 5) Alt recycling While players are free to delete characters as they see fit, excessive recycling of characters not permitted and disciplinary actions will be decided on a case by case basis. General guideline: donGÇÖt do it to avoid consequences within game mechanics.
source: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=117249#post117249 Forum fix for firefox and chrome Get working images and colored text Classic forum style 2.25final |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery Situation: Normal
56
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
Othran wrote:Thorn Galen wrote:Othran wrote:More drivel. End yourself and do us all a favour. Touched a nerve, have I ? One should not comment about how code is being exploited ingame, because that will ruin your gameplay...... If I end myself, will you come with me ? Your tears are delicious. Stop reading my posts if my drivel upsets you so much. I've never suicide ganked anyone - seems boring to me. However I will defend the right of people to do so - there's plenty means of defence apart from Concord. Anyway as I said, if your OP gets edited by mods then its an exploit. If it doesn't its utter drivel. I'm betting on utter drivel.
You don't understand how the logic works for someone like the OP.
It's an exploit, and even CCP don't know it.
Just him.
- "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Kitty McKitty
In Praise Of Shadows
287
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
Please get your argument straight before posting poorly informed whines on the forums. This post as example shows how clueless you are...
Thorn Galen wrote:Op makes a very valid point - ganking is part of this game.
Op just neglects to mention the manner in which the way Concord currently functions, in how this is being abused as an exploit. This just makes it easier to gank without consequence, to gank with impunity knowing there's a 99% chance that you will get away with it.
Op is also whining about whining. No difference there, just a different point of view.
I do not care a rats-azz about mining, I do care about how Concord is stunted and being abused.
No one gets away with a suicide gank. GÖÑ Haviing your portrait painted here helps INTAKI Disabled Children GÖÑ |

Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
Othran wrote:I've never suicide ganked anyone - seems boring to me. However I will defend the right of people to do so - there's plenty means of defence apart from Concord.
So it seems at least we agree on one point. I never for one minute said banstick on ganking, quite the opposite. However, your continuous use of the word "drivel" has me drooling. Still reading ?
The door is not real. |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:04:00 -
[22] - Quote
Grey Stormshadow wrote:Othran wrote:Grey Stormshadow wrote:Ifly Uwalk wrote:Evading CONCORD - sploit. Also excessive character recycling is a exploit, so rather use same -10sec toon all the time and resupply ships to him with an alt. Nuff said. Any character recycling if its been suicide ganking is an exploit. You are supposed to keep it for at least 3 months* after the last aggression of any sort. Then you're OK to recycle it. Anything less and if you're petitioned then you get the banstick. *this was considered a "suitable time to wait for recycling" in 2009. Gods only know now. [quote=GM Karidor] 5) Alt recycling While players are free to delete characters as they see fit, excessive recycling of characters not permitted and disciplinary actions will be decided on a case by case basis. General guideline: donGÇÖt do it to avoid consequences within game mechanics. source: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=117249#post117249
Indeed - I'm just saying what I saw as being called "acceptable" a couple of years ago. Of course back then insurance made it possible to fund alt-building accounts by suicide ganking so its probably a little more lenient now. |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:05:00 -
[23] - Quote
Tactics like these make EvE what it is and reflects the phrase "adapt or die" on its finest. Forum fix for firefox and chrome Get working images and colored text Classic forum style 2.25final |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:05:00 -
[24] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:Othran wrote:I've never suicide ganked anyone - seems boring to me. However I will defend the right of people to do so - there's plenty means of defence apart from Concord. So it seems at least we agree on one point. I never for one minute said banstick on ganking, quite the opposite. However, your continuous use of the word "drivel" has me drooling. Still reading ?
Anyway as I said, if your OP gets edited by mods then its an exploit. If it doesn't its utter drivel.
I'm betting on utter drivel. |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:10:00 -
[25] - Quote
Kitty McKitty wrote:Please get your argument straight before posting poorly informed whines on the forums. This post as example shows how clueless you are... Thorn Galen wrote:Op makes a very valid point - ganking is part of this game.
Op just neglects to mention the manner in which the way Concord currently functions, in how this is being abused as an exploit. This just makes it easier to gank without consequence, to gank with impunity knowing there's a 99% chance that you will get away with it.
Op is also whining about whining. No difference there, just a different point of view.
I do not care a rats-azz about mining, I do care about how Concord is stunted and being abused.
No one gets away with a suicide gank.
Yea... maybe that is why the word "suicide" is before the gank.
Forum fix for firefox and chrome Get working images and colored text Classic forum style 2.25final |

Kengutsi Akira
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:12:00 -
[26] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:I am quoting from a different thread as it is evident there is a lack of understanding regarding how Concord is being exploited at this point in time.
"Khanh'rhh wrote: It is INTENDED game mechanics that a -10 player can enter highsec if he choses. He has to suffer the fact that anyone and everyone can shoot him, and the faction police will spawn within about 3 seconds, wherever he goes.
Where is the exploit? Did he a) Find a way to stop you pointing his ship? b) Find a way to stop you shooting his ship? c) Find a way to stop CONCORD from destroying his ship? d) Find a way to evade the faction police indefinitely?
Please post the exact exploit, please.
Them being a "bad man" is not an exploit, FYI."
The exploit is attracting Concord to a location away from where they are not wanted, in other words, to make them take that little bit longer to spawn. It's all very well documented by the "we will stop ice-mining in highsec" plan. Goonswarm have made it very clear how this all works, perhaps to attract a fix to it by CCP.
Saying that I said anything other than me calling it an exploit is just post-padding and fishing for tears which are not there. I said it is an exploit being used, not that you cannot enter Highsec if you have very low sec status, not that you shouldn't be able to kill whoever in highsec. Doing so with impunity, knowing you stand a very good chance of getting away with it cleanly. Clearly that is an exploit.
You can be as bad as you want to be, I never suggested any restrictions on that or anything else. Looking at the way the majority of current ice-miner ganking is being done - it is an exploit.
It is working as intended. If you dont believe me, petition it. I did, thinking as you did. I was set straight. It is not an exploit according to CCP. It damn sure looks like one to me but to them its not.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
320
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:14:00 -
[27] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:The exploit is attracting Concord to a location away from where they are not wanted, in other words, to make them take that little bit longer to spawn. In other words, there is no exploit.
If there is one, it's that miners can make CONCORD appear sooner than they should appear.
GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

EVE Stig
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:17:00 -
[28] - Quote
Othran wrote:Simetraz wrote:If it is a exploit you are not aloud to discuss it on the forums. If you believe it is a exploit you should fill out a petition with CCP and see above. If you are just trolling, carry on.
Good point - discussion of "exploits" is bannable mmmm? At the very least the post gets heavily edited. /me sits back and waits for nothing to happen to OPs post 
Indeed, example:
Quote:CLEANING UP YOUR OWN CONCORD SPAWN
Cleaning up your own CONCORD spawn, so other people can make their own attack runs, is actually really easy. Dock at the closest station to the belt you just ganked in, then immediately undock in a newbie ship and don't move - simply drift for 30 seconds with your docking immunity. This will pull CONCORD to you, and since you have your docking immunity sentry guns will not kill you before CONCORD gets there. If multiple people participated in a gank, they should all do this at the same time.
Please make sure to clean up your own CONCORD spawns whenever possible: it makes life easier for everyone else and really isn't very difficult.
Quote:CLEARING OTHER PEOPLE'S CONCORD SPAWNS
Sometimes clever pubbies, or lazy goons, will leave a spawn in a belt. You need to get rid of that before you gank, or you'll be instagibbed when you gank (unless you're in a Galtpest).
Concord usually only spawns one fleet per system. Concord, once spawned, will travel from place to place dealing with anything that shoots something they shouldn't. That means you just need to summon CONCORD somewhere else: take a newbieship in an alt and plink something - a GSC, or the staging pos. Just don't do it near faction police or sentry guns, so you don't die before CONCORD gets there.
If two people gank at once, however, there will be two fleets. It appears that the closest spawn is the one that moves: ergo get closer to the spawn you want to move (nearby belt, nearby pos, whatever) than the one you don't, then summon it. If all else fails, use safespots just off-grid. Don't worry about CONCORD being close: they take a flat 6 seconds to warp regardless of distance.
not exploits "Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"! |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
683
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:26:00 -
[29] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:its hilarious how little you understand concord and how nonsensical your argument is once you do
these people really have no idea how concord works, and to think we're new to hisec
it's laughable and explains why our victims are dying in droves - at least the ones who are still undocking |

Angel of Night
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 16:29:00 -
[30] - Quote
OP lost some macks? Alts are unable to bot mine ice? Petitioned the losses and was not happy with the reply? With these facts included, you are correct! This has to be an exploit.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |