Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3633
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:30:00 -
[91] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:Just because a Company doesn't want to admit it, doesn't mean it isn't true. Plenty of examples of that. This is EVE. CCP's game. Not Yusef's game. It doesn't matter what you think harassment means. In this context, the only relevant definition is CCP's definition. Eve is a game. This is not the real world. Just because you are so disconnected from reality that you think harassment in the true sense of the word is ONLY defined by a game company doesn't mean others will feed into your delusion. You and others like you are so disconnected from the real world that I believe you need to have a time out 
In any other PvP game a "bumper" would be regarded as some hybrid between human failure and a psycho. In EvE it's sanctioned game play though. EvE indeed attracts a special kind of players. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
181
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:30:00 -
[92] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Mine aligned to another part of the belt or to another belt. Warp when a bumper approaches. Bumping solved by being ATK.
Exactly the same tactic that has always provided guaranteed safety from gankers.
This shows that you are nothing but biased and have no real credible opinion. This doesn't work with ice mining, which is what they target. You would never be able to complete a cycle. Problem not solved. Typical belligerent undesirable thinking...
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Depends on the skill of the bumper and the bumpee.
Or the miner could just pay 10 million ISK and that's it.
No, it doesn't. It's either get bumped or pay. Extortion, risk free extortion. Filth. |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
560
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:31:00 -
[93] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:Eve is a game. This is not the real world. Just because you are so disconnected from reality that you think harassment in the true sense of the word is ONLY defined by a game company doesn't mean others will feed into your delusion. You and others like you are so disconnected from the real world that I believe you need to have a time out  You started off well, but then you misunderstood me.
What harassment means in the real world applies in the real world.
What harassment means according to CCP applies in EVE.
No overlap.
|

Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
181
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:33:00 -
[94] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Tali Ambraelle wrote:Eve is a game. This is not the real world. Just because you are so disconnected from reality that you think harassment in the true sense of the word is ONLY defined by a game company doesn't mean others will feed into your delusion. You and others like you are so disconnected from the real world that I believe you need to have a time out  You started off well, but then you misunderstood me. What harassment means in the real world applies in the real world. What harassment means according to CCP applies in EVE. No overlap.
Yes, there is. Eve is not a magical place where real world conduct does not apply. Harassment is harassment is harassment until such time that Oxford University decides to change the definition. Keep feeding your delusions though! It simply makes it more evident that you are nothing but a filthy belligerent undesirable who has no place in high sec  |

Yusef Yeasef Yosef
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
150
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:34:00 -
[95] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:RubyPorto wrote:So charging rent on someone who lands on Boardwalk is harassment, despite Hasbro's claims to the contrary?
When the people who make the rules for a game say that the rules allow X, X is allowed. Duh. Now you are just getting silly.  You made the claim.
The subject of "bumping in Eve" and "charging rent in Monopoly" are not even in the same relm in regard to gameplay.
Bumping in non-combat situations is an emergent form of harassment allowed by loose gampley rules. Charging rent is on the other hand, is a clearly written mechanic of gameplay.
One is allowed by loose rules, the other is a specific game mechanic. Trying to equate the two is simply, silly.
|

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2310
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:36:00 -
[96] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Mine aligned to another part of the belt or to another belt. Warp when a bumper approaches. Bumping solved by being ATK.
Exactly the same tactic that has always provided guaranteed safety from gankers. This shows that you are nothing but biased and have no real credible opinion. This doesn't work with ice mining, which is what they target. You would never be able to complete a cycle. Problem not solved.  Typical belligerent undesirable thinking...
Even with Ice mining, it takes less time to relock after warping somewhere you're aligned to than slowboating back from wherever you've been bumped to.
Or just pay the 10m ISK.
Or mine Ore if Ice mining is too "risky."
Quote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Depends on the skill of the bumper and the bumpee.
Or the miner could just pay 10 million ISK and that's it. No, it doesn't. It's either get bumped or pay. Extortion, risk free extortion. Filth.
Feel free to create some risk for them by ganking them.
But "Risk Free" extortion of people engaged in a Risk Free activity. Sounds like a fit. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
Guess Who's Back. -á Back Again. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2310
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:38:00 -
[97] - Quote
Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:The subject of "bumping in Eve" and "charging rent in Monopoly" are not even in the same relm in regard to gameplay.
Bumping in non-combat situations is an emergent form of harassment allowed by loose gampley rules. Charging rent is on the other hand, is a clearly written mechanic of gameplay.
One is allowed by loose rules, the other is a specific game mechanic. Trying to equate the two is simply, silly.
Bumping is a specific game mechanic. CCP specifically included collisions as a game mechanic. Some space games do not have collision detection at all.
Both are quite specific game mechanics. But people playing monopoly understand that they're playing with other people who might sometimes cause them in-game inconvenience. People complaining about bumping do not seem to understand that. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
Guess Who's Back. -á Back Again. |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
560
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:40:00 -
[98] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:Yes, there is. Eve is not a magical place where real world conduct does not apply. Harassment is harassment is harassment until such time that Oxford University decides to change the definition. Keep feeding your delusions though! It simply makes it more evident that you are nothing but a filthy belligerent undesirable who has no place in high sec  No there isn't. I can harass you according to your definition (or interpretation of the OED's definition) as much as I like ingame, so long as I don't harass you according to CCP's definition. 
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6272
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:43:00 -
[99] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Or mine Ore if Ice mining is too "risky."
But mining ore requires slightly more attention than ice mining, which only requires less than a minute of attention every hour. This is too much for AFKers. ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. ~~~~i am god~~~~ |

Yusef Yeasef Yosef
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
150
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:44:00 -
[100] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:The subject of "bumping in Eve" and "charging rent in Monopoly" are not even in the same relm in regard to gameplay.
Bumping in non-combat situations is an emergent form of harassment allowed by loose gampley rules. Charging rent is on the other hand, is a clearly written mechanic of gameplay.
One is allowed by loose rules, the other is a specific game mechanic. Trying to equate the two is simply, silly. Bumping is a specific game mechanic. CCP specifically included collisions as a game mechanic. Some space games do not have collision detection at all. Both are quite specific game mechanics. But people playing monopoly understand that they're playing with other people who might sometimes cause them in-game inconvenience. People complaining about bumping do not seem to understand that.
Bumping for combat situations is completely valid, as in where it results in ship destruction.
Outside of that, it is harrasment. CCP may not admit to this, but any reasonable person would; unless they are weakly attempting to justify their in-game behavior.
You can spin it anyway you like, but it simply ends up being "weak-sauce" behavior justification.
|
|

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
264
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:45:00 -
[101] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Mine aligned to another part of the belt or to another belt. Warp when a bumper approaches. Bumping solved by being ATK.
Exactly the same tactic that has always provided guaranteed safety from gankers. This shows that you are nothing but biased and have no real credible opinion. This doesn't work with ice mining, which is what they target. You would never be able to complete a cycle. Problem not solved.  Typical belligerent undesirable thinking... Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Depends on the skill of the bumper and the bumpee.
Or the miner could just pay 10 million ISK and that's it. No, it doesn't. It's either get bumped or pay. Extortion, risk free extortion. Filth.
You could also MINE ELSEWHERE. Like in another system where the new order is not active. It's not that damn hard. |

Randolph Rothstein
whatever corp.
307
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:45:00 -
[102] - Quote
now now
lets not pretend like there arent people who bump others not because they particularly like spaceship mmo interaction but because they like to annoy others - there are a55holes like that who would do anything if it made someone else mad - thats griefing
fortunately for them its hard to prove,but i bet everyone knows such individuals 
|

Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
181
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:45:00 -
[103] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:No there isn't. I can harass you according to your definition (or interpretation of the OED's definition) as much as I like ingame, so long as I don't harass you according to CCP's definition. 
Further delusions! Hahaha. My definition? It is the definition of the world. Not only are you an undesirable in Eve, but even in the real world! How wonderful to know 
RubyPorto wrote: Even with Ice mining, it takes less time to relock after warping somewhere you're aligned to than slowboating back from wherever you've been bumped to.
Or just pay the 10m ISK.
Or mine Ore if Ice mining is too "risky."
Clearly, you do not know how Ice Mining works. Please talk more and continue to discredit yourself 
|

Opertone
Aurora Empire Fuzzy Nut Attack Squirrels
275
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:48:00 -
[104] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:To reiterate on what people have said, this is still being discussed given the fact its a seen as a "widespread issue" by a lot of people. .... I've given the GM Team a heads up regarding this thread 
CCP reads forums, yay!
AFK mining buff, nooooo !!! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6272
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:48:00 -
[105] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:Clearly, you do not know how Ice Mining works. Please talk more and continue to discredit yourself 
yes, ice mining is very complex
step 1: fit a mackinaw step 2: undock, warp to ice field step 3: lock ice, f1-f2 step 4: one whole hour later, move ice to orca ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. ~~~~i am god~~~~ |

Aracimia Wolfe
Fade To Darkness
141
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:49:00 -
[106] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:The subject of "bumping in Eve" and "charging rent in Monopoly" are not even in the same relm in regard to gameplay.
Bumping in non-combat situations is an emergent form of harassment allowed by loose gampley rules. Charging rent is on the other hand, is a clearly written mechanic of gameplay.
One is allowed by loose rules, the other is a specific game mechanic. Trying to equate the two is simply, silly. Bumping is a specific game mechanic. CCP specifically included collisions as a game mechanic. Some space games do not have collision detection at all. Both are quite specific game mechanics. But people playing monopoly understand that they're playing with other people who might sometimes cause them in-game inconvenience. People complaining about bumping do not seem to understand that.
And this is what gets me.
It's the sense of entitlement. The instantaneous cry of "harrassment" as if they were in a single player game and in a risk free space game. Even X-BTF wasn't that risk free. At First 
They feel they don't have a defence, fine thats cool, to an extent I think there might be a valid point there. A good bumper is nigh impossible to avoid. Then again lets take a look at the "Scam" itself. 10 mill for 365 days, Christ I fart more than that doing l4's and mining is way more lucrative (I know I've tried it) So what are the options.
Pay up, go somewhere else or find an alternative method to combat the agressors.
That first one appears to be a point of nothing more than pride. The Second appears to be nothing more than stubbornness and the last one would necessitate the banding together of people which appears to be outside their capabilities, so lets cry for CCP instead. Sheesh.
O,k Dialing back the rant a bit, and ignoring completely the cries of the space lawyer inclined (seriously, you're being that guy, you know who you are, don't be that guy.)
Surely it would be better all round than instead of crying harassment or griefing to actually give CCP some positive feedback and sensible ideas? Instead of sticking your hands out place some good ideas in the pot.
Someone a while back mentioned an anchoring module, kind of like a seige module for ships making them much harder to move. Great idea I felt.
Takes power and a module, be bumped or stay still at the loss of tank/cargo/speed e.t.c
I like my coffee like I like my men. In a plastic cup http://aracimia.blogspot.co.uk/ |

Boudacca Sangrere
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 20:55:00 -
[107] - Quote
Aracimia Wolfe wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:The subject of "bumping in Eve" and "charging rent in Monopoly" are not even in the same relm in regard to gameplay.
Bumping in non-combat situations is an emergent form of harassment allowed by loose gampley rules. Charging rent is on the other hand, is a clearly written mechanic of gameplay.
One is allowed by loose rules, the other is a specific game mechanic. Trying to equate the two is simply, silly. Bumping is a specific game mechanic. CCP specifically included collisions as a game mechanic. Some space games do not have collision detection at all. Both are quite specific game mechanics. But people playing monopoly understand that they're playing with other people who might sometimes cause them in-game inconvenience. People complaining about bumping do not seem to understand that. And this is what gets me. It's the sense of entitlement. The instantaneous cry of "harrassment" as if they were in a single player game and in a risk free space game. Even X-BTF wasn't that risk free. At First  They feel they don't have a defence, fine thats cool, to an extent I think there might be a valid point there. A good bumper is nigh impossible to avoid. Then again lets take a look at the "Scam" itself. 10 mill for 365 days, Christ I fart more than that doing l4's and mining is way more lucrative (I know I've tried it) So what are the options. Pay up, go somewhere else or find an alternative method to combat the agressors. That first one appears to be a point of nothing more than pride. The Second appears to be nothing more than stubbornness and the last one would necessitate the banding together of people which appears to be outside their capabilities, so lets cry for CCP instead. Sheesh. O,k Dialing back the rant a bit, and ignoring completely the cries of the space lawyer inclined (seriously, you're being that guy, you know who you are, don't be that guy.) Surely it would be better all round than instead of crying harassment or griefing to actually give CCP some positive feedback and sensible ideas? Instead of sticking your hands out place some good ideas in the pot. Someone a while back mentioned an anchoring module, kind of like a seige module for ships making them much harder to move. Great idea I felt. Takes power and a module, be bumped or stay still at the loss of tank/cargo/speed e.t.c
I am sorry, but that is just silly. Your solution is to give each bumper 10 mil. and trust them not to bump you for a year. Sure honey, if that is what you truely belive I got a..(insert Jita scam du jure) to sell.
B, |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
264
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 21:01:00 -
[108] - Quote
Boudacca Sangrere wrote:Aracimia Wolfe wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:The subject of "bumping in Eve" and "charging rent in Monopoly" are not even in the same relm in regard to gameplay.
Bumping in non-combat situations is an emergent form of harassment allowed by loose gampley rules. Charging rent is on the other hand, is a clearly written mechanic of gameplay.
One is allowed by loose rules, the other is a specific game mechanic. Trying to equate the two is simply, silly. Bumping is a specific game mechanic. CCP specifically included collisions as a game mechanic. Some space games do not have collision detection at all. Both are quite specific game mechanics. But people playing monopoly understand that they're playing with other people who might sometimes cause them in-game inconvenience. People complaining about bumping do not seem to understand that. And this is what gets me. It's the sense of entitlement. The instantaneous cry of "harrassment" as if they were in a single player game and in a risk free space game. Even X-BTF wasn't that risk free. At First  They feel they don't have a defence, fine thats cool, to an extent I think there might be a valid point there. A good bumper is nigh impossible to avoid. Then again lets take a look at the "Scam" itself. 10 mill for 365 days, Christ I fart more than that doing l4's and mining is way more lucrative (I know I've tried it) So what are the options. Pay up, go somewhere else or find an alternative method to combat the agressors. That first one appears to be a point of nothing more than pride. The Second appears to be nothing more than stubbornness and the last one would necessitate the banding together of people which appears to be outside their capabilities, so lets cry for CCP instead. Sheesh. O,k Dialing back the rant a bit, and ignoring completely the cries of the space lawyer inclined (seriously, you're being that guy, you know who you are, don't be that guy.) Surely it would be better all round than instead of crying harassment or griefing to actually give CCP some positive feedback and sensible ideas? Instead of sticking your hands out place some good ideas in the pot. Someone a while back mentioned an anchoring module, kind of like a seige module for ships making them much harder to move. Great idea I felt. Takes power and a module, be bumped or stay still at the loss of tank/cargo/speed e.t.c I am sorry, but that is just silly. Your solution is to give each bumper 10 mil. and trust them not to bump you for a year. Sure honey, if that is what you truely belive I got a..(insert Jita scam du jure) to sell. B,
Move to another system. It's free. |

Boudacca Sangrere
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 21:07:00 -
[109] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Boudacca Sangrere wrote:Aracimia Wolfe wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:The subject of "bumping in Eve" and "charging rent in Monopoly" are not even in the same relm in regard to gameplay.
Bumping in non-combat situations is an emergent form of harassment allowed by loose gampley rules. Charging rent is on the other hand, is a clearly written mechanic of gameplay.
One is allowed by loose rules, the other is a specific game mechanic. Trying to equate the two is simply, silly. Bumping is a specific game mechanic. CCP specifically included collisions as a game mechanic. Some space games do not have collision detection at all. Both are quite specific game mechanics. But people playing monopoly understand that they're playing with other people who might sometimes cause them in-game inconvenience. People complaining about bumping do not seem to understand that. And this is what gets me. It's the sense of entitlement. The instantaneous cry of "harrassment" as if they were in a single player game and in a risk free space game. Even X-BTF wasn't that risk free. At First  They feel they don't have a defence, fine thats cool, to an extent I think there might be a valid point there. A good bumper is nigh impossible to avoid. Then again lets take a look at the "Scam" itself. 10 mill for 365 days, Christ I fart more than that doing l4's and mining is way more lucrative (I know I've tried it) So what are the options. Pay up, go somewhere else or find an alternative method to combat the agressors. That first one appears to be a point of nothing more than pride. The Second appears to be nothing more than stubbornness and the last one would necessitate the banding together of people which appears to be outside their capabilities, so lets cry for CCP instead. Sheesh. O,k Dialing back the rant a bit, and ignoring completely the cries of the space lawyer inclined (seriously, you're being that guy, you know who you are, don't be that guy.) Surely it would be better all round than instead of crying harassment or griefing to actually give CCP some positive feedback and sensible ideas? Instead of sticking your hands out place some good ideas in the pot. Someone a while back mentioned an anchoring module, kind of like a seige module for ships making them much harder to move. Great idea I felt. Takes power and a module, be bumped or stay still at the loss of tank/cargo/speed e.t.c I am sorry, but that is just silly. Your solution is to give each bumper 10 mil. and trust them not to bump you for a year. Sure honey, if that is what you truely belive I got a..(insert Jita scam du jure) to sell. B, Move to another system. It's free.
Apparently reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Replacing one dumb idea with another seems to be though.
B.
|

Lord Leftfield
The Society Calyxes
75
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 21:34:00 -
[110] - Quote
i think i just sputterd coffe all over the screen when i saw a isd member write that trolling on GD was prohibited  |
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
3274
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 21:44:00 -
[111] - Quote
I'm playing this game, and in this game I sell materials gained from mining ice.
Now, since I want the most profit possible, I use valid game mechanics to keep other players from mining ice in my area (unless they pay me a fee).
What part of this could possibly be considered griefing or harrassment either in game or outside it?
To any sane person, none of it. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Aracimia Wolfe
Fade To Darkness
141
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 22:09:00 -
[112] - Quote
Boudacca Sangrere wrote:Aracimia Wolfe wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:The subject of "bumping in Eve" and "charging rent in Monopoly" are not even in the same relm in regard to gameplay.
Bumping in non-combat situations is an emergent form of harassment allowed by loose gampley rules. Charging rent is on the other hand, is a clearly written mechanic of gameplay.
One is allowed by loose rules, the other is a specific game mechanic. Trying to equate the two is simply, silly. Bumping is a specific game mechanic. CCP specifically included collisions as a game mechanic. Some space games do not have collision detection at all. Both are quite specific game mechanics. But people playing monopoly understand that they're playing with other people who might sometimes cause them in-game inconvenience. People complaining about bumping do not seem to understand that. And this is what gets me. It's the sense of entitlement. The instantaneous cry of "harrassment" as if they were in a single player game and in a risk free space game. Even X-BTF wasn't that risk free. At First  They feel they don't have a defence, fine thats cool, to an extent I think there might be a valid point there. A good bumper is nigh impossible to avoid. Then again lets take a look at the "Scam" itself. 10 mill for 365 days, Christ I fart more than that doing l4's and mining is way more lucrative (I know I've tried it) So what are the options. Pay up, go somewhere else or find an alternative method to combat the agressors. That first one appears to be a point of nothing more than pride. The Second appears to be nothing more than stubbornness and the last one would necessitate the banding together of people which appears to be outside their capabilities, so lets cry for CCP instead. Sheesh. O,k Dialing back the rant a bit, and ignoring completely the cries of the space lawyer inclined (seriously, you're being that guy, you know who you are, don't be that guy.) Surely it would be better all round than instead of crying harassment or griefing to actually give CCP some positive feedback and sensible ideas? Instead of sticking your hands out place some good ideas in the pot. Someone a while back mentioned an anchoring module, kind of like a seige module for ships making them much harder to move. Great idea I felt. Takes power and a module, be bumped or stay still at the loss of tank/cargo/speed e.t.c I am sorry, but that is just silly. Your solution is to give each bumper 10 mil. and trust them not to bump you for a year. Sure honey, if that is what you truely belive I got a..(insert Jita scam du jure) to sell. B,
Tell you what sweety, how about you read all the post and then take an affirmative action on what I wrote at the end. it'll save you looking any sillier pumpkin.
I like my coffee like I like my men. In a plastic cup http://aracimia.blogspot.co.uk/ |

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks
483
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 22:10:00 -
[113] - Quote
Just as a quick aside:
Ruby, I'm extremely glad to see you back on your proper spacedude. Grats on that and never stop doing your thing. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |

baltec1
Bat Country
4695
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 22:44:00 -
[114] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:I'm playing this game, and in this game I sell materials gained from mining ice.
Now, since I want the most profit possible, I use valid game mechanics to keep other players from mining ice in my area (unless they pay me a fee).
What part of this could possibly be considered griefing or harrassment either in game or outside it?
To any sane person, none of it.
Given the nerf to ganking this is the only realistic option left too. |

Tarsas Phage
Disposition Matrix
117
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 23:04:00 -
[115] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:This shows that you are nothing but biased and have no real credible opinion. This doesn't work with ice mining, which is what they target. You would never be able to complete a cycle. Problem not solved.  Typical belligerent undesirable thinking...
Then orbit the ice you're mining from. For a bumper, a moving ship is far less of a target than a stationary one. Do you completely lack any imagination? Christ, you lot really are the mindless F1 punchers of highsec.
Drones on auto-aggro for rats [X] CHECK Roid in range of laz0rz [X] CHECK Punch F1...F3 [X] CHECK Drool all over yourself while ore hold fills [X] CHECK and CHECK
Extra Credit: Maybe plead in local to mooch off someone's Orca boosts.
|

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
264
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 23:28:00 -
[116] - Quote
Boudacca Sangrere wrote: Apparently reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Replacing one dumb idea with another seems to be though.
B.
I have not seen a single bumper in months while mining. If you spit on the very easy way to avoind the new order, you should not be blaming anyone for this problem. Deal with it or move. Bumperless mining belts are just a few clicks away. |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
994
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 23:44:00 -
[117] - Quote
Guarantee bumping miners will be considered griefing by this time next week. That sure will resolve the problem too.
I mean it's not like the entire thing was caused by the nerf to excessive buffs to mining barge EHP or anything and even if it was you can't do anything that would upset the miners. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
365
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 00:18:00 -
[118] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Guarantee bumping miners will be considered griefing by this time next week. That sure will resolve the problem too.
I mean it's not like the entire thing was caused by the nerf to excessive buffs to mining barge EHP or anything and even if it was you can't do anything that would upset the miners.
If the small minority of whiners think it's bad now, wait and see how much we ramp up suicide ganking ops if bumping does magically become an exploit. Will we be back here in 6 months because of epic whining about suicide ganking? Will CCP suddenly rule that an exploit? What about the awoxing that we're sure to employ if ganking gets banned?
Still, hopefully, the GMs will look at the facts and see that our "victims" clearly have sufficient tools at their disposal to defend themselves already. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Kory DarkHeart
CareBear Cowboys.
2
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 04:55:00 -
[119] - Quote
I am new to eve, so missed out on the original post 
I have and will do it again - bumping miners. For a new player that has no skills I found it the only way to defend myself against those lesser players that sit in hi sec mining in the big mining ships (barges I think they are called). IMO they should be in 0.6 and lower as they have the skills, play the game.
Why I bumped as a new player. I was doing the tutorial and had to mine same ore, warped to a belt and there was two barges mining. I moved to the other side of the belt so as not to get in there way. One of the players moved across the belt (aprox 25km to my position and stated to mine the rock I was. OK they were here first and it might be their area.
So I started to mine another one and then that player started to mine that one I was doing - WTF So I bumped and bumped and bumped.
I hope they keep it as is, eve has a multitude of options and its the lazy that want it changed instead of looking for an ingame solution. Don't turn eve into a WOW pandora baby game.
-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á "Find something fun to do and do it" - Darius Johnson : Goonswarm |

Super spikinator
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 05:13:00 -
[120] - Quote
Kory DarkHeart wrote:I am new to eve, so missed out on the original post  I have and will do it again - bumping miners. For a new player that has no skills I found it the only way to defend myself against those lesser players that sit in hi sec mining in the big mining ships (barges I think they are called). IMO they should be in 0.6 and lower as they have the skills, play the game. Why I bumped as a new player. I was doing the tutorial and had to mine same ore, warped to a belt and there was two barges mining. I moved to the other side of the belt so as not to get in there way. One of the players moved across the belt (aprox 25km to my position and stated to mine the rock I was. OK they were here first and it might be their area. So I started to mine another one and then that player started to mine that one I was doing - WTF So I bumped and bumped and bumped. I hope they keep it as is, eve has a multitude of options and its the lazy that want it changed instead of looking for an ingame solution. Don't turn eve into a WOW pandora baby game.
You. You're a good pilot. This ladies and gentlemen is what we need. Miners bumping the bots and bot-aspirants so they have a shot at making an isk. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |