Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1203
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 07:48:00 -
[151] - Quote
Anndy wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Anndy wrote:Lin Suizei wrote:Anndy wrote:and that logic is exactly why things need to be change, just because you can do something doesn't mean you should or that its the right thing to do Because clearly, we should all adhere to a single definition of what is "right" and "wrong", as defined by you. yes the same line pretty much every dictator, tyrant, and terrorist has used to justify their actions Video game != real life. No one playing this game is a dictator, tyrant, or terrorist*... but the thing about a sandbox is, their in-game character CAN be a dictator, tyrant or terrorist. So what? It's a game. If you have a problem with it, then you deal with it IN GAME. You wanna take on "bad people doing bad things" then do it in the game. Don't expect CCP to come along and turn their sandbox into a concrete slab just because you can't handle sinking a little. *Somehow, I imagine they have more pressing concerns to deal with. you know its funny, before goons and their bull **** came along this game was actually fun but all goons have brought us is the mentally ill that only desire to abuse people and ruin the game for others this game used to be fun, it was never just about the gank or sipping tears, it was a quality community that had honor and respected others, sure we still had scams and greifing but it wasn't widespread like it is now, this community has really became just a bunch of people looking to **** anyone and everyone every chance they get then turn around and brag about it
I'm pretty sure you're just being obnoxious now. The mentally ill? Grow up. If you knew anything about mental illness, you wouldn't equate it with people blowing up your pixels for ***** and giggles. If you're not having fun, then what are you doing here? "This game used to be fun" - but it isn't anymore? I'm having plenty of fun, but if it ever became no longer fun for me, I would leave.
Don't blame anyone else for your own masochism if you're the one putting yourself through something you can't (or refuse to) enjoy for the sake of reasons to make changes to game mechanics that are working as intended. |

JC Anderson
Noir. Black Legion.
892
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 07:54:00 -
[152] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:
While this would be incredibly hilarious to see, can you imagine the carnage at the undock of any busy trading hub such as, say, Jita 4-4, with the implementation of collision damage?
That's it I vote for the collision damage option!
Especially if it results in Concord killing both ships since they would both be damaged. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2328
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 08:18:00 -
[153] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:RubyPorto wrote:TharOkha wrote:BoSau Hotim wrote:I'm surprised that the miner bumping 'issue' has become an issue for the Dev's to consider. What about bumping vet miners who mine out all the ore in starter systems? Miner bumping isnt the problem. It can be easy avoided (if you are not AFK) Problem is freighter bumping with frigates and LOL bumping with stabbers so it cannot warp out. It just doesnt make sense Logoffski and you disappear in 60s. Log back in a few minutes later and warp off. It's hard to pull off when you afk auto-pilot a freighter full of stuff.
So don't Autopilot AFK if it's too risky for you. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
Guess Who's Back. -á Back Again. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
820
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 08:20:00 -
[154] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:To reiterate on what people have said, this is still being discussed given the fact its a seen as a "widespread issue" by a lot of people. It's January 7th, we still have a fair number of staff who are visiting their families or otherwise taking time out over the holiday period. There'll be a response, and as was pointed out, it was stated that it'll be after the New Year. I've given the GM Team a heads up regarding this thread 
It's not considered a "widespread issue" by a lot of people. It's a tiny none issue but the tiny, tiny minority who think EVE should be a wow-clone never shut the hell up |

Solstice Project
Join me if you hate people
2517
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 08:25:00 -
[155] - Quote
It's sad to see the non-carebears letting themselves always get dragged into discussions with the carebears. You non-carebears act as if it was a necessity to talk to them, ignoring that it makes you just as weak as them.
The non-carebears don't have any way to force anything onto us. They are weaklings. The only reason they succeed is because *you let them* !
Well all know the right way to deal with bigmouths, so why do you keep talking pointless discussions which have *no* end, because they'll never understand anyway ? They are like the kid that keeps running a bigmouth and when you slap them, he starts to cry and runs to his mother.
This whole discussion is *pointless*. It's as pointless as any other discussion with them ever was and will be. But every time one of these discussions start, it plays right into their hands. From one nerf to another.
You keep talking and let CCP decide things for you. That's what they want and that's what they'll achieve, because you don't actually do anything against them ... no ... you just keep talking. From one nerf to the next.
I feel sad for New Eden.
o/ Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2328
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 08:31:00 -
[156] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:RubyPorto wrote:So... instance undocks so that station games are even safer by preventing people from bumping them out of docking range? Prevent people from bumping gatecrashers away from the gate? Please read what I write more carefully in future - I never said I supported a collision damage system, I was merely outlining the work that would go into it. All you've done is suggest that if such a system were to be implemented, gamers would have to think of new ways to prevent people from docking or jumping, and since "gatecrashers" are really only a problem in low or nul, that's what your guns are for.
Did I say that you supported it? I just rephrased your outline in simpler terms and expanded on it.
If removing collision detection were to be implemented, what new method would you use to prevent a tanky ship from crashing the gate? (Because they are guaranteed 1 MWD cycle, Scram and web often is not enough.)
What method would you use to keep a Titan outside of a POS shield for long enough to kill it after it sticks its nose out to DD something? Because why should it only be gates and stations that are magical grids of collision-free space?
Quote:That doesn't mean it can't be done, or that it won't be done, just that it would entail a lot of work, which is the point that I was making.
I'm starting to see why people accuse you of logical fallacies. Please try to get the point being made right before you go trying to debate something that isn't actually worth debating, especially if the person making the point does not, in any way, support a collision damage system. If such a system were to be implemented, then the pathfinding algorithms would have to a whole hell of a lot better too otherwise hitting "orbit" near any kind of debris in a battlefield is going to get very messy, which is even more work. And the more work and complex code in a game, the more likely things are to go wrong with it.
Seriously, though, read posts before you reply to them.
But it probably means that it shouldn't be done. Which is the point I was making.
When each new change issued in an attempt to "fix" a "problem" spawns two new ones or requires increasingly bizarre justifications, you might consider looking at the "problem" and see if it's worth "fixing," or even if it's actually a problem in the first place.
In the case of bumping, it is very much working as intended. As for miners, just remember, industrialized ganking was much easier to counter than bumping (tanking their ship was all that was required), and it was entirely their complaints that spelled the end of industrialized ganking and the rise of bumping. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
Guess Who's Back. -á Back Again. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
820
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 08:32:00 -
[157] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:Just because a Company doesn't want to admit it, doesn't mean it isn't true. Plenty of examples of that. This is EVE. CCP's game. Not Yusef's game. It doesn't matter what you think harassment means. In this context, the only relevant definition is CCP's definition. Eve is a game. This is not the real world. Just because you are so disconnected from reality that you think harassment in the true sense of the word is ONLY defined by a game company doesn't mean others will feed into your delusion. You and others like you are so disconnected from the real world that I believe you need to have a time out 
You're the one who is incredibly disconnected from the real world if you think real life definitions of "harassment" include preventing your character in a video game from making the maximum amount of imaginary in game money |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2328
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 08:48:00 -
[158] - Quote
TharOkha wrote:Yeah, because every freighter pilot is AFKer right?  While miner CAN avoid bumping just by simply NOT be AFK, freighter pilot cannot. Im talking about LOL bumping near the gates which is pure grief. And thats why DEVs considers this as an issue. Also bumping freighter with frigate?  logic 
http://www.physicstogo.org/images/features/supertanker-large-7-26-07.jpg
Small Ship + Oversized Engine muscles around Giant Ship + Weak engine. Looks like it's working just fine.
Just like a Frigate (or more likely a cruiser) bumping a Freighter around. KE=.5MV^2. In other words, a 10mn AB Dramiel (mass 5.9m kg, speed 5800m/s) has 190 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy, while a Charon (mass 960m kg, speed 94m/s) has only 10 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy. (The Dram also carries 2.5 times the momentum of the Charon.)
A bog standard 1mn MWD Dramiel (1.5 million kg, 6100m/s) still has over 40 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy to the Freighters 10 trillion.
Why are you surprised that a ship with more energy and momentum than your freighter is able to knock your frieghter around? This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
Guess Who's Back. -á Back Again. |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
273
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 09:09:00 -
[159] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:TharOkha wrote:Yeah, because every freighter pilot is AFKer right?  While miner CAN avoid bumping just by simply NOT be AFK, freighter pilot cannot. Im talking about LOL bumping near the gates which is pure grief. And thats why DEVs considers this as an issue. Also bumping freighter with frigate?  logic  http://www.physicstogo.org/images/features/supertanker-large-7-26-07.jpgSmall Ship + Oversized Engine muscles around Giant Ship + Weak engine. Looks like it's working just fine. Just like a Frigate (or more likely a cruiser) bumping a Freighter around. KE=.5MV^2. In other words, a 10mn AB Dramiel (mass 5.9m kg, speed 5800m/s) has 190 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy, while a Charon (mass 960m kg, speed 94m/s) has only 10 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy. (The Dram also carries 2.5 times the momentum of the Charon.) A bog standard 1mn MWD Dramiel (1.5 million kg, 6100m/s) still has over 40 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy to the Freighters 10 trillion. Why are you surprised that a ship with more energy and momentum than your freighter is able to knock your frieghter around?
I just always wonder where all the extra mass given by the MWD comes from. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1205
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 09:11:00 -
[160] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:RubyPorto wrote:TharOkha wrote:Yeah, because every freighter pilot is AFKer right?  While miner CAN avoid bumping just by simply NOT be AFK, freighter pilot cannot. Im talking about LOL bumping near the gates which is pure grief. And thats why DEVs considers this as an issue. Also bumping freighter with frigate?  logic  http://www.physicstogo.org/images/features/supertanker-large-7-26-07.jpgSmall Ship + Oversized Engine muscles around Giant Ship + Weak engine. Looks like it's working just fine. Just like a Frigate (or more likely a cruiser) bumping a Freighter around. KE=.5MV^2. In other words, a 10mn AB Dramiel (mass 5.9m kg, speed 5800m/s) has 190 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy, while a Charon (mass 960m kg, speed 94m/s) has only 10 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy. (The Dram also carries 2.5 times the momentum of the Charon.) A bog standard 1mn MWD Dramiel (1.5 million kg, 6100m/s) still has over 40 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy to the Freighters 10 trillion. Why are you surprised that a ship with more energy and momentum than your freighter is able to knock your frieghter around? I just always wonder where all the extra mass given by the MWD comes from.
E=MC^2
More speed = more mass
deal with it.
|
|

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1205
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 09:21:00 -
[161] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:
But it probably means that it shouldn't be done. Which is the point I was making.
When each new change issued in an attempt to "fix" a "problem" spawns two new ones or requires increasingly bizarre justifications, you might consider looking at the "problem" and see if it's worth "fixing," or even if it's actually a problem in the first place.
In the case of bumping, it is very much working as intended. As for miners, just remember, industrialized ganking was much easier to counter than bumping (tanking their ship was all that was required), and it was entirely their complaints that spelled the end of industrialized ganking and the rise of bumping.
So... let's put aside "who's accusing who of what" for a moment and stick to the actual points. I kinda thought that "it shouldn't be done" was implied with "it would be a lot of work and create more bugs/glitches/problems for the game that are inherent with more complex code". Maybe I could have communicated this point better, but I think you are missing the part where I am agreeing with you 100%. There is no need for a collision damage system, nor is there a practical way to implement one. |

Lexmana
866
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 09:54:00 -
[162] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote: E=MC^2
deal with it.
Haha. /thread. |

Mhax Arthie
University of Caille Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 10:03:00 -
[163] - Quote
Not sure why people talk about bumping since this business turned into a massive goongamstyle gankfest and more than that, now they ewok many corporations force them to disband or completely change their playstyle.
I was a big fan of James when he started his small business last summer as it was so hilarious seeing him bumping miners and make a decent living from it. But in the end, it turned into a massive bloodbath bringing hate and violence to the extreme. Now is all about "pay or you will be ganked/pay and you will be still ganked". I don't have much sympathy toward miners, but forcing people to play-live according to your personal rules is not something we should just let go that easy. As it is now, nobody can stop this gankbang, no matter what... they use legit game mechanics and that's why they are unstoppable. If CCP will not step in, this will get very ugly. |

Fix Lag
463
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 10:29:00 -
[164] - Quote
Mhax Arthie wrote:If CCP will not step in, this will get very ugly.
I think it's beautiful. |

Singular Snowflake
New Order Logistics CODE.
15
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 11:08:00 -
[165] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:To reiterate on what people have said, this is still being discussed given the fact its a seen as a "widespread issue" by a lot of people.
How many is "a lot of people" in this context? The 7 regular highsec whiners and their alts in GD? The ones trying to organize mass petitioning of completely legal gameplay in order to overwhelm the GMs and force yet another change in their favor? |

Mhax Arthie
University of Caille Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 11:08:00 -
[166] - Quote
Fix Lag wrote:Mhax Arthie wrote:If CCP will not step in, this will get very ugly. I think it's beautiful. Might be, very possible that Fanfest could turn into a major gankfest.] They should invite Slipknot for the ambient background  |

Mutant Caldari
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 11:13:00 -
[167] - Quote
Tarsas Phage wrote:Tali Ambraelle wrote:This shows that you are nothing but biased and have no real credible opinion. This doesn't work with ice mining, which is what they target. You would never be able to complete a cycle. Problem not solved.  Typical belligerent undesirable thinking... Then orbit the ice you're mining from. For a bumper, a moving ship is far less of a target than a stationary one. Do you completely lack any imagination? Christ, you lot really are the mindless F1 punchers of highsec. Drones on auto-aggro for rats [X] CHECKRoid in range of laz0rz [X] CHECKPunch F1...F3 [X] CHECKDrool all over yourself while ore hold fills [X] CHECK and CHECKExtra Credit: Maybe plead in local to mooch off someone's Orca boosts. Couldn't have said it better myself. So many absolutely brain dead highsec carebears in this thread that it's sickening. |

Anndy
The Evocati
46
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 11:14:00 -
[168] - Quote
Mhax Arthie wrote:Fix Lag wrote:Mhax Arthie wrote:If CCP will not step in, this will get very ugly. I think it's beautiful. Might be, very possible that Fanfest could turn into a major gankfest.] They should invite Slipknot for the ambient background 
never happen, its easy to play tough in a digital world without consequence but the real world is another thing where actions actually matter |

Lin Suizei
44
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 11:22:00 -
[169] - Quote
Anndy wrote:never happen, its easy to play tough in a digital world without consequence but the real world is another thing where actions actually matter
I really think there should really be a new miner bingo square for this argument.
EVE is real. Because you know, I was there. Do your part for a better Highsec tomorrow - kill an AFK miner today! |

baltec1
Bat Country
4707
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 11:24:00 -
[170] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:It's sad to see the non-carebears letting themselves always get dragged into discussions with the carebears. You non-carebears act as if it was a necessity to talk to them, ignoring that it makes you just as weak as them.
The non-carebears don't have any way to force anything onto us. They are weaklings. The only reason they succeed is because *you let them* !
Well all know the right way to deal with bigmouths, so why do you keep talking pointless discussions which have *no* end, because they'll never understand anyway ? They are like the kid that keeps running a bigmouth and when you slap them, he starts to cry and runs to his mother.
This whole discussion is *pointless*. It's as pointless as any other discussion with them ever was and will be. But every time one of these discussions start, it plays right into their hands. From one nerf to the next nerf.
You keep talking and let CCP decide things for you. That's what they want and that's what they'll achieve, because you don't actually do anything against them ... no ... you just keep talking. From one nerf to the next nerf.
I feel sad for New Eden.
o/
We didnt speak out against the people whining about having their untanked mining shipsblown up. CCP believed their lies and made a horrible balance pass on barges. We will not make that mistake again. |
|

Pewty McPew
Pillage Plunder And Rape Industries
123
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 11:37:00 -
[171] - Quote
Mhax Arthie wrote:Might be, very possible that Fanfest could turn into a major gankfest.] They should invite Slipknot for the ambient background 
Alcohol and RL ganking hmmm, I see no good coming of that. Fanfest would be more like Brawlfest.
If they held Fanfest here in Detroit and someone tried to gank you, the simple response here would be just to shoot back, problem solved. Detroit where the weak are killed and eaten.
|

John E Normus
New Order Logistics CODE.
13
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 11:50:00 -
[172] - Quote
All I can say is, James 315 is a genius and we're all dancing to the sound of his fiddle.
 |

Solstice Project
Join me if you hate people
2519
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 11:56:00 -
[173] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:We didnt speak out against the people whining about having their untanked mining shipsblown up. CCP believed their lies and made a horrible balance pass on barges. We will not make that mistake again. That wasn't what i meant. It's good to speak out *against* the weak, but it's bad to let oneself get lured into pointless discussions *with* the weak.
I am *all* on your - anybodies - side, as long as you stick to the natural laws of evolution. Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

baltec1
Bat Country
4708
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 12:02:00 -
[174] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote: That wasn't what i meant. It's good to speak out *against* the weak, but it's bad to let oneself get lured into pointless discussions *with* the weak.
I am *all* on your - anybodies - side, as long as you stick to the natural laws of evolution.
Fear not forum poster for we are also posting up numbers, real facts and are willing to deploy graphs to make these numbers even easyer to read. |

Aracimia Wolfe
Fade To Darkness
143
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 12:14:00 -
[175] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:RubyPorto wrote:TharOkha wrote:Yeah, because every freighter pilot is AFKer right?  While miner CAN avoid bumping just by simply NOT be AFK, freighter pilot cannot. Im talking about LOL bumping near the gates which is pure grief. And thats why DEVs considers this as an issue. Also bumping freighter with frigate?  logic  http://www.physicstogo.org/images/features/supertanker-large-7-26-07.jpgSmall Ship + Oversized Engine muscles around Giant Ship + Weak engine. Looks like it's working just fine. Just like a Frigate (or more likely a cruiser) bumping a Freighter around. KE=.5MV^2. In other words, a 10mn AB Dramiel (mass 5.9m kg, speed 5800m/s) has 190 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy, while a Charon (mass 960m kg, speed 94m/s) has only 10 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy. (The Dram also carries 2.5 times the momentum of the Charon.) A bog standard 1mn MWD Dramiel (1.5 million kg, 6100m/s) still has over 40 trillion Joules of Kinetic energy to the Freighters 10 trillion. Why are you surprised that a ship with more energy and momentum than your freighter is able to knock your frieghter around? I just always wonder where all the extra mass given by the MWD comes from. E=MC^2 More speed = more mass deal with it.
Which always made me wonder how the mass was then taken care of while in warp, I can only assume some kind of partial or full neutralisation of inertia thereby making the mass a non issue for your acceleration potential. Or something. I need to lay off the EE Doc smith books and read eve lore I guess. I like my coffee like I like my men. In a plastic cup http://aracimia.blogspot.co.uk/ |

Mhax Arthie
University of Caille Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 12:59:00 -
[176] - Quote
Pewty McPew wrote:Mhax Arthie wrote:Might be, very possible that Fanfest could turn into a major gankfest.] They should invite Slipknot for the ambient background  Alcohol and RL ganking hmmm, I see no good coming of that. Fanfest would be more like Brawlfest. If they held Fanfest here in Detroit and someone tried to gank you, the simple response here would be just to shoot back, problem solved. Detroit where the weak are killed and eaten. Tbh, I still can't believe that CCP tend to let drunk/alcoholic people perform on stage, as it happens on alliance panel where usually most of the participants are totally wasted. I really hope that this year CCP will not encourage people to get drunk, it's the 10th years anniversary and this fanfest should be a moment of joy not an opportunity for some people to vent some major frustrations.
Personally I hope that James will stop the mindless gank and get back to the afk miners bumping, I had the laugh of my life reading and seeing the afk minners floating in space for hours km away from the belts... high quality entertainment!  |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3194
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 13:14:00 -
[177] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Solstice Project wrote: That wasn't what i meant. It's good to speak out *against* the weak, but it's bad to let oneself get lured into pointless discussions *with* the weak.
I am *all* on your - anybodies - side, as long as you stick to the natural laws of evolution.
Fear not forum poster for we are also posting up numbers, real facts and are willing to deploy graphs to make these numbers even easyer to read. You're a ~data blobber~ Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
822
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 13:26:00 -
[178] - Quote
Mhax Arthie wrote:Not sure why people talk about bumping since this business turned into a massive goongamstyle gankfest and more than that, now they ewok many corporations force them to disband or completely change their playstyle.
I was a big fan of James when he started his small business last summer as it was so hilarious seeing him bumping miners and make a decent living from it. But in the end, it turned into a massive bloodbath bringing hate and violence to the extreme. Now is all about "pay or you will be ganked/pay and you will be still ganked". I don't have much sympathy toward miners, but forcing people to play-live according to your personal rules is not something we should just let go that easy. As it is now, nobody can stop this gankbang, no matter what... they use legit game mechanics and that's why they are unstoppable. If CCP will not step in, this will get very ugly.
Sorry, but yes it is. Welcome to EVE Online.
|

Mike Adoulin
Trans-Aerospace Industries
137
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 13:29:00 -
[179] - Quote
Mhax Arthie wrote:Personally I hope that James will stop the mindless gank and get back to the afk miners bumping, I had the laugh of my life reading and seeing the afk minners floating in space for hours km away from the belts... high quality entertainment! 
It's highly probable that James only began ganking because it's considered a legit tactic in highsec (see Goons On Ice), while *gasp* BUMPING *gasp* is an Ancient Evil and is Officially Under Discussion.
TLDR; ganking them for isk is Working As Intended, bumping them for isk may soon become bannable.
He's just covering his bases. From James POV, ganking miners is expensive, time consuming, and cuts into his profit-margin. But CCP just might change the EULA (and if they do I can't wait until freighter pilots start sending CCP petitions against bumpy pirates/gankers....), so he is making sure he has a gameplay mode to fall back on.
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
822
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 13:39:00 -
[180] - Quote
It'd be a complete bloody joke if CCP "banned" bumping. Miners cried and cried and cried instead of fitting a tank, so CCP caved and made some huge built in tanks... and what did the miners do? Rejoice? No, they found something else to cry about and demand "fixing".
Calling it now: If CCP ban bumping, the miners will immediately find some new thing to cry about because it slows down their potential isk making and botting |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |