Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
476
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 17:13:00 -
[91] - Quote
i'm not joking about the profitability level, I think I was looking at a slepnir bpo that cost as much as a titan bpo or something and produced less than a billion a month in an amarr tier 3 station upgraded for making t2 ships |

VaMei
Meafi Corp
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 17:34:00 -
[92] - Quote
Hellenna Cain wrote:The only players that object to removing T2 BPOs are the ones that have them.
And they have the audacity to say that invention is better.
I don't have a T2 BPO. My corp doesn't have one, or access to one. I object to removing them.
I object to the lottery, or any method of adding new ones, but when it comes to the ones that have been in game for years, any perceived advantage to owning one is factored into the price of buying one, or the opportunity cost of not selling one. |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
132
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 18:20:00 -
[93] - Quote
remove the T2 bpos give everyone that has a t2 BPO 400 max run, max ME/PE BPC copies of said item
this should be 1-3 years worth of always building the item and at the cheapest cost possible.
|

Sable Moran
Moran Light Industries
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 18:40:00 -
[94] - Quote
This dead horse again.... Can't you leave it be already, this is way beyond desecration.
Simetraz wrote:But as you say the players have 0 information about how many of each type of BPO is out there
Actually we do. These numbers are from memory so they may not be exact but the magnitude is correct.
When the T2 BPO lottery began we (the players) were given 8 BPO's for ships and about 20 for modules. In the end these number were a bit higher, 20+ BPO's for ships, 50-60 (80?) for modules and 100 (might have been 200) for ammo.
These numbers have been stated by the devs in a devblog or forum post, I don't remember which anymore.
Note that some of those BPO's aren't there anymore for various reasons. Some have been blown up, some have disappeared with permanently banned accounts (20-25 alone in the aftermath of the POS exploit according to 'the other forum thou shalt not name'), and some simply are forgotten in some obscure hangar somewhere because they are not worth the trouble. Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Laboratories Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene. |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
78
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 19:04:00 -
[95] - Quote
CCP has a history of not removing items after removing the ability to gain them. Its part of the awesome free market thing we got going on here.
Go look at pretty much any 'micro' sized mod. They still exist, but only because they haven't all been blown up yet.
If you want T2 BPOs removed from the game, do it yourself. Its totally possible, if you work hard enough to make it happen, since it seems most T2 BPO holders don't actually want them, and should be willing to sell you the BPO for enough to recoup their losses. Do remember, their loses are VERY large, considering the price of the BPO. o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Lucas Kell
Lost Enterprises... SOLAR WING
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 19:15:00 -
[96] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Hellenna Cain wrote:The only players that object to removing T2 BPOs are the ones that have them. Patently false. But sure, if you want to take that route: the only ones who want T2 BPOs removed are the ones who have no idea how manufacturing works, and who need someone to blame because they cannot bear the thought that it is their own failure that is bringing them downGǪ  Come on, it would be fair for you to say "the only ones that was T2 BPOS removed are the ones that don't have them", but theres no needto go saying people dont understand manufacturing, just cos they don't share your viewpoint. I think this thread has shown that the matter is fairly heavily split with relatively good arguments both for and against. |

Kengutsi Akira
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 23:06:00 -
[97] - Quote
Hellenna Cain wrote:Regardless if T2 BPO's are an advantage or not. The should be removed.
- if It is an advantage, it should be removed to balance the game.
- If it is not an advantage and invention is better, then tech 2 BPO's are not needed and will not be missed.
I would favor change them to a max run bpc with the same ME and PE to ensure enough training time for the untrained to catch up.
Im game. If everyone else has to work to get their T2 Bpcs, the current holders of T2 BPOs should too. Its pretty unfair that T2 researchers are handling the only chance based function (couldnt think of a better word) IN THE GAME (where it applies to manufacturing etc) when there are people with the BPOs to build those items and dont have to deal with stupid chances.
Better yet, make it so the BPOs have a chance to build the item based on the chance to not build the item in question.
I mean seriously, think of how that whole fun chance based thing would be if it wasnt just invention that had it. If all industrial jobs had it. How fun would it be if all jobs to build a ship had a chance to fail and consume the resources without getting anything back. Or for that matter, if mining lasers had a chance to fail at the end of the cycle. Or weapons. Wouldnt THAT be fun? |

Flyinghotpocket
Ascetic Virtues
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 23:19:00 -
[98] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Hi Is the Invention & T2 BPO situation ever likely to change? The problem being that where originally BPOs were given out, which can be researched and all that jazz, but now only invention works giving you some crappy ME copy. This means that if you don't own a T2 BPO, you will NEVER be able to produce at a price that is competetive to an alliance with a T2 BPO.
It doesnt even matter if it's ridiculously hard to produce a BPO, make it a 1 in 1,000,000 chance on invention or something, but either BPOs need to start working their way back into the game, or the existing T2 BPOs need to go, because without that you are basically saying there's no point in working towards industry since you'll never be able to beat the already exising industial corps.
Yea. thanks to t2 BPO's still existing a really cool section of the game is a complete waste of SP.
CCP take t2 BPO's out of the game, the guys who have had them had there run, and its time has ended.
Alot of intelligent people play this game and see invention as something worth investing in. Do not make it a waste of time any longer. |

Gank'aho
One within we are
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 23:20:00 -
[99] - Quote
Posting to confirm OP is an idiot. Also, eve isn't fair, T2BPO's don't give an advantage, and newbs cry. Carry on.
Long story short, if you want the "alleged" advantage of T2BPO's buy them, they only cost billions. |

Flyinghotpocket
Ascetic Virtues
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 23:30:00 -
[100] - Quote
Gank'aho wrote:Posting to confirm OP is an idiot. Also, eve isn't fair, T2BPO's don't give an advantage, and newbs cry.  Carry on. Long story short, if you want the "alleged" advantage of T2BPO's buy them, they only cost billions.
Posting to confirm you have no idea what your talking about. |

Gank'aho
One within we are
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 23:32:00 -
[101] - Quote
Flyinghotpocket wrote:Gank'aho wrote:Posting to confirm OP is an idiot. Also, eve isn't fair, T2BPO's don't give an advantage, and newbs cry.  Carry on. Long story short, if you want the "alleged" advantage of T2BPO's buy them, they only cost billions. Posting to confirm you have no idea what your talking about. Actually I know exactly what im talking about, everything I said was true... Eve is not far, T2BPO's don't give an advantage, and Newbies DO cry....better luck next time. Ohh and OP is an idiot |

Flyinghotpocket
Ascetic Virtues
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 23:42:00 -
[102] - Quote
Gank'aho wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote:Gank'aho wrote:Posting to confirm OP is an idiot. Also, eve isn't fair, T2BPO's don't give an advantage, and newbs cry.  Carry on. Long story short, if you want the "alleged" advantage of T2BPO's buy them, they only cost billions. Posting to confirm you have no idea what your talking about. Actually I know exactly what im talking about, everything I said was true... Eve is not far, T2BPO's don't give an advantage, and Newbies DO cry....better luck next time. Ohh and OP is an idiot
last time i checked it nigh impossible to make any kind of profit on the t2 sabre market when inventing BPC's. short of FINDING the materials yourself. |

Gank'aho
One within we are
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 23:50:00 -
[103] - Quote
Flyinghotpocket wrote:Gank'aho wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote:Gank'aho wrote:Posting to confirm OP is an idiot. Also, eve isn't fair, T2BPO's don't give an advantage, and newbs cry.  Carry on. Long story short, if you want the "alleged" advantage of T2BPO's buy them, they only cost billions. Posting to confirm you have no idea what your talking about. Actually I know exactly what im talking about, everything I said was true... Eve is not far, T2BPO's don't give an advantage, and Newbies DO cry....better luck next time. Ohh and OP is an idiot last time i checked it nigh impossible to make any kind of profit on the t2 sabre market when inventing BPC's. short of FINDING the materials yourself. It is also nigh impossible to make any kind of profit on the t2 sabre market when using T2 BPO's...game, set, match. |

EVE Stig
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 00:13:00 -
[104] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Hellenna Cain wrote:Regardless if T2 BPO's are an advantage or not. The should be removed.
- if It is an advantage, it should be removed to balance the game.
- If it is not an advantage and invention is better, then tech 2 BPO's are not needed and will not be missed.
I would favor change them to a max run bpc with the same ME and PE to ensure enough training time for the untrained to catch up. Im game. If everyone else has to work to get their T2 Bpcs, the current holders of T2 BPOs should too. Its pretty unfair that T2 researchers are handling the only chance based function (couldnt think of a better word) IN THE GAME (where it applies to manufacturing etc) when there are people with the BPOs to build those items and dont have to deal with stupid chances. Better yet, make it so the BPOs have a chance to build the item based on the chance to not build the item in question. I mean seriously, think of how that whole fun chance based thing would be if it wasnt just invention that had it. If all industrial jobs had it. How fun would it be if all jobs to build a ship had a chance to fail and consume the resources without getting anything back. Or for that matter, if mining lasers had a chance to fail at the end of the cycle. Or weapons. Wouldnt THAT be fun?
like this, it sounds like fun "Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"! |

Lucas Kell
Lost Enterprises... SOLAR WING
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 00:25:00 -
[105] - Quote
Gank'aho wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote:Gank'aho wrote:Posting to confirm OP is an idiot. Also, eve isn't fair, T2BPO's don't give an advantage, and newbs cry.  Carry on. Long story short, if you want the "alleged" advantage of T2BPO's buy them, they only cost billions. Posting to confirm you have no idea what your talking about. Actually I know exactly what im talking about, everything I said was true... Eve is not far, T2BPO's don't give an advantage, and Newbies DO cry....better luck next time. Ohh and OP is an idiot I'm neither a newbie nor an idiot, nice trolling.
Are you hiding behind that char, or is that really how long you've been playing? |

Kengutsi Akira
29
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 00:52:00 -
[106] - Quote
I like EVE Stig's swagger. We should do that. There comes a point when yer fighting against the flow that you say screw it and let yourself be washed away. Like Mittens an the other CSM Goon. They battled against CCP directly, now theyre trying to change EVE the fun way. |

Xtraneous
Sam's Space Guys
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 01:03:00 -
[107] - Quote
I suspect this whole thread is a troll, but i'll ask the OP - If you believe that T2 BPOs offer an advantage over invention why don't you work towards purchasing some? Anyone can buy T2 BPOs, there's always a few available in contracts.
It was mentioned there are approx 10,000 T2 BPOs floating around, I suspect this number is alot higher than the total of Supercap BPOs owned by players. And just like supercap BPOs anyone can purchase T2 BPOs if you feel that's the best way to invest your isk.
Infact there's a Light Ion Blaster II BPO (ME 80) available right now on contracts for the price of 20Bil why hasn't it been sold?
Is it because the return on capital is so low? Is it because any patch your investment could become near worthless if CCP nerfs your item? Is it because that build slot could build vastly more profitable items?
The only reason I see for owning T2 BPOs is because they have a good isk/click ratio. I do infact have T2 BPOs, and I build on 1mth cycles. I could make far more isk producing alot of other items and inventing whatever is most profitable but that dosen't fit with the time I have to play Eve. I started playing after invention and worked hard to earn my T2 prints. |

Vyktor Abyss
The Abyss Corporation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 01:13:00 -
[108] - Quote
It is about time all the circle jerk BPO holders got their hands burnt after playing pass the overpriced hot potato for so long.
As the lovely troll a few posts above me pointed out, Eve is not fair. CCP should dump on the BPO holders and just remove them then sort out invention efficiency to properly re-balance "cost" of t2 ships.
I agree with vanity items, heck even unique ships that are uber because they can/will get blown up when used, but unique T2 BPOs that account for 1/3 of all T2 ship production [Source: CCP Dr.Egghead]..... no, get out. |

Kengutsi Akira
29
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 01:18:00 -
[109] - Quote
Vyktor Abyss wrote: As the lovely troll a few posts above me pointed out,
lol it ceases being a troll when its a good point thats in line with the conversation at hand doesnt it?
|

Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 02:10:00 -
[110] - Quote
Fact of the matter is:
Everyone(!) here will argue to their own benefit.
For someone new to the game, understandably, they feel they should get a fair shot at getting their hands on these items as the dinasaurs or business mongooses OR would stop complaining if there was no (Functional) T2 BPO out there.
If someone are in possession of any T2 BPOs they will claim T2 BPOs hardly exist at all and they will at the same time lie about owning one while making any retorical argumentation available to torpedo anyone who argues for removal or reimplementation of T2 BPOs. We all understand that realisation of either of these two posibilitis would result in a major loss to these individuals. You are allowed to disagree but stuff the math up your arses, you're not fooling anyone.
Bottom line:
There is no real reason why T2 BPOs should be allowed to remain in game in there present form. Render them inert so people can keep the as collectables or some such OR re-introduced T2 BPOs in some form of another. This will form an equal market and, after all, getting new people to join in on the Eve experience without feeing they are going agains an unbeatable elite is what matters no?
Stay sharp,T2 BPOs are on their way (out)
(flunk out the last word... or not... whichever suits you). |

Kengutsi Akira
30
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 02:45:00 -
[111] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:Fact of the matter is:
Everyone(!) here will argue to their own benefit.
For someone new to the game, understandably, they feel they should get a fair shot at getting their hands on these items as the dinasaurs or business mongooses OR would stop complaining if there was no (Functional) T2 BPO out there.
If someone are in possession of any T2 BPOs they will claim T2 BPOs hardly exist at all and they will at the same time lie about owning one while making any retorical argumentation available to torpedo anyone who argues for removal or reimplementation of T2 BPOs. We all understand that realisation of either of these two posibilitis would result in a major loss to these individuals. You are allowed to disagree but stuff the math up your arses, you're not fooling anyone.
Bottom line:
There is no real reason why T2 BPOs should be allowed to remain in game in there present form. Render them inert so people can keep the as collectables or some such OR re-introduced T2 BPOs in some form of another. This will form an equal market and, after all, getting new people to join in on the Eve experience without feeing they are going agains an unbeatable elite is what matters no?
Stay sharp,T2 BPOs are on their way (out)
(flunk out the last word... or not... whichever suits you).
They eventually WOULD be all gone wouldnt they? They get blown up etc, you cant get a new one, so eventually, theyre all gone get it at some point arent they?
so if you want them out of the game, hunt for people with them and kill them |

Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 03:25:00 -
[112] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Schmacos tryne wrote:Fact of the matter is:
Facts
Dribble
Sight, it's like wankink off with a cheese grater....
Your reasoning is nothing else then crap and puts you into the secret T2 BPO owner category.
We'll all die of old age too eventually. No reason why the world woudn't benefit if some of us should be remeved in some way sooner rather then later.
If you for a second think you'll find a lot of 50bill+ BPO carrying Dhally Whallies flying around for you to wack at your conveniance, think again.
Get this into your narrow forhead: There is NO reason not to deal with T2 BPOs one way or another as pointed out in my previous post.
Just to **** everybody off, CCP should add them to the NEX store  |

Kengutsi Akira
30
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 03:34:00 -
[113] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:
Sight, it's like wankink off with a cheese grater....
Your reasoning is nothing else then crap and puts you into the secret T2 BPO owner category.
lol what a compliment, you pretending I have T2 BPOs lol yeah, no, even on my main, Ive never had ONE BILLION much less multiples of them
I was actually pretty pissed off when I realized there is effectively a hard ceiling on production in that you cant GET T2 BPOs anymore.
Then I realized the WHY of it. They need to do this in more games and yes, they need to remove the BPOs as well.
|

Shadowsword
The Rough Riders Ares Protectiva
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 05:50:00 -
[114] - Quote
Hellenna Cain wrote:The only players that object to removing T2 BPOs are the ones that have them.
And they have the audacity to say that invention is better.
I don't have one, I don't want them removed.
And I have yet to see any motive here other than envy and jealousness to support their removal.
By the way, did you know that some T2 BPOs are real cheap? I'm sure you can find something like a T2 micro-smartbomb BPO pour less than 500M, or a Wasp II BPO for les than 4B. Saying you can't obtain a T2 BPO is patently false. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
437
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 07:07:00 -
[115] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Come on, it would be fair for you to say "the only ones that was T2 BPOS removed are the ones that don't have them", but theres no needto go saying people dont understand manufacturing No, it would not be fair, because that would be to make the same mistake as Hellenna did. So instead, I did something much fairer: I introduced an actual reason why people want them removed (and one that is quite probably the closest we can come to the truth).
Quote:I think this thread has shown that the matter is fairly heavily split with relatively good arguments both for and against. If by GÇ£fairly splitGÇ¥ you mean GÇ£no useful arguments for a removalGÇ¥ and GÇ£a bunch of arguments againstGÇ¥ then yes. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Ruby Hotrod
X Generation
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 13:06:00 -
[116] - Quote
BPO's should have been removed a long time ago. The old lottery style before R+D changed was a farce anyway, it was strange how some of the big name alliances won most of them and they are now the ones complaining that it is not more profitable than a BPC 
Also had a lot of dodgy dev dealing back then too. |

Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:24:00 -
[117] - Quote
Shadowsword wrote:Hellenna Cain wrote:The only players that object to removing T2 BPOs are the ones that have them.
And they have the audacity to say that invention is better. I don't have one, I don't want them removed.And I have yet to see any motive here other than envy and jealousness to support their removal. By the way, did you know that some T2 BPOs are real cheap? I'm sure you can find something like a T2 micro-smartbomb BPO pour less than 500M, or a Wasp II BPO for les than 4B. Saying you can't obtain a T2 BPO is patently false.
Then why on earth should you care? |

Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:40:00 -
[118] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote: I was actually pretty pissed off when I realized there is effectively a hard ceiling on production in that you cant GET T2 BPOs anymore.
Then I realized the WHY of it. They need to do this in more games and yes, they need to remove the BPOs as well.
I'm not pissed but I *DO* get the fact that the owners of T2 BPO's would take a pretty hard hit if they get removed/reintroduced.
That being said, there is no need to remove them, just render them inert (can't be used, just as collectables for those who fancy these things).
This way, Invention/BPC's will be unaffected and still a valiable game-occupation.
The other way around, if they got re-introduced, why not let invention be the way to obtain new T2 BPOs (a marginal chance atleast)? This way Invention would be a very lucrative business which would result in either Failure, a BPC or in extreemly rare cases a BPO.
I guess I'm dim, but I still haven't seen a single good argument why they shouldn't be dealt with other than the people arguing for dealing with them is pittifull envious penisheads...
I guess the same could have been said about the people arguing for removal of learning skills and see how much better the game got after removing them... (Yeah the last part was ironic but screw it you (should) get my point since most people was pro removal of them). |

Rhinanna
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:56:00 -
[119] - Quote
Quote:I've done the math on a number of T2 items, and some of them, no matter how much you throw into invention, you could never even produce cheap enough to make profit over existing sell orders, you'd actually be losing alot of ISK. Sure you might be lucky enough to avoid that market, and for me, I currently do, so can make a decent amount, but that doesnt change the experience I gained previously from attempting profitable T2 production.
Have you factored in they may be getting other materials (Moon goo for example) cheaper than you?
Also what makes you think you have the RIGHT to be able to competitively produce everything? You don't. Its like moaning that you can't make super-caps in empire. Tough, learn to live with it and move into a profitable area.
Most likely OP spent a load of money getting ready to produce something without doing the research first and is now butt-hurt ;) |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |