| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
729
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 11:24:00 -
[31] - Quote
an example that is probably more along the lines of what OP is thinking about (a forum outcry that actually changed ccp's opinion on some issue) would be "free ccp abathur"
(also shows that ccp is not one monolithic entity and that whatever the players are asking for generally already has some supporters within ccp - but the forums can influence which faction inside the company gains the upper hand) I'm a NPC corp alt, any argument I make is invalid. |

Gerard Hareka
State Protectorate Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 11:34:00 -
[32] - Quote
Yes
All the carebaers whining makes game safer and safer. All the goons trolling stop any change in 0.0 mechanics and status Quo.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1271
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 11:50:00 -
[33] - Quote
Lets see here, the Nano Nerf came about because of the players posting.
Supercarriers and Titan changes recently were due to the players posting complaints.
About 4 years ago they tried to put in a change to supers that got about 100 pages in 24 hours, the change was scrapped.
The dumping of Incarna was due largely to actions and forum efforts by players.
You see a long long time ago, the Devs used to be MUCH more active in and around the forums, they were regular posters and one could ask a question and actually get a Dev response within a few days.
With Nathan moving on and some of the older devs stepping back, as well as the size of the game increasing so much most of that is gone the way of the dodo, but yes, the forums do help give CCP ideas and let them know things that players want and or need. |

Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
279
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 11:56:00 -
[34] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Pohbis wrote:No, what some people tried to fool them into thinking, was that people really cared if it was a couple of million below or above the profitability line to gank them. "No CCP, really, if people go full tank we wont destroyer-gank just for lulz. We swear! Please!"  Funny how the ganking more or less vanished when it became unprofitable to do. Funny how you skate over the "couple of million" part.
If you want to continue arguing that it was done for the chance of a measy profit, and not because it was a low-cost, low-effort way to get some lulz, please, go ahead.
We both know that it hasn't dropped significantly because it became unprofitable, but because it became too unprofitable. More importantly, it requires more people, hence ::effort::, now.
But go on, keep explaining to us how Hulkageddon was all about profits  |

Vexen Lyre
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 12:53:00 -
[35] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:mining barge buffs Can't emphasize this enough the forum whining got mining barges their unwarranted EHP buffs.
I thought it was because your alliance sponsored a massive in-game event that demonstrated just how easy and cheap it was to gank barges with T1 destroyers?
you burned that candle to a stump, meight. that's why they buffed barges, forum whine was mostly ancillary. Docked in Jita - Moon 4 - Caldari Navy Assembly Plant |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
3029
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 12:59:00 -
[36] - Quote
Pohbis wrote:But go on, keep explaining to us how Hulkageddon was all about profits 
Hulkageddon was about profits. Besides the prizes on offer to the gankers, and the wonderful benefits to hulk manufacturers, the people holding Technetium moons made even more ludicrous profits than normal. When the prizes and bounties were available, ganking increased. When the money disappeared, the ganking decreased.
But please, explain to me how Hulkageddon was not about profits.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1079
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 13:00:00 -
[37] - Quote
Vexen Lyre wrote:La Nariz wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:mining barge buffs Can't emphasize this enough the forum whining got mining barges their unwarranted EHP buffs. I thought it was because your alliance sponsored a massive in-game event that demonstrated just how easy and cheap it was to gank barges with T1 destroyers? you burned that candle to a stump, meight. that's why they buffed barges, forum whine was mostly ancillary.
You abuse it, you lose it. Miners should be thanking goons for their EHP boost.
|

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
941
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 13:05:00 -
[38] - Quote
I would have to disagree that discussions limited to the forum ever got anything changed in Eve. To my knowledge all changes occurred in this order:
1) Whine threads ad nauseam. To which CCP's reply was typically, "We value you as a loyal customer. Here's a rubik's cube, now go F*$( yourself.
2) Subs start to drop.
3) CCP makes changes.
The changes to the barges cited as a change due to discussion can be directly correlated to YEARS of whine threads discussing how no tank could be successfully added to them without ganking their ability to mine making some non-mining ships competitive w/ better tanks. Coupled with this were years to whine threads about being ganked so easily. And finally, at the height of the gankage dedicated miners just dropping subs. I know many who left and were never seen again because CCP continued to ignore the rampant abuse of miners on multiple fronts:bots, ganking, etc.
We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
279
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 13:10:00 -
[39] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Pohbis wrote:But go on, keep explaining to us how Hulkageddon was all about profits  But please, explain to me how Hulkageddon was not about profits. Oh dear Lord.
Does the fact that it required a 3rd party to sponsor the event for it to become profitable for the people doing the ganking, give you any sort of clue you might apply to this discussion?
....
No? I'll give you a hint: People never ganked barges because it was profitable. |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
729
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 13:15:00 -
[40] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:I would have to disagree that discussions limited to the forum ever got anything changed in Eve. To my knowledge all changes occurred in this order:
1) Whine threads ad nauseam. To which CCP's reply was typically, "We value you as a loyal customer. Here's a rubik's cube, now go F*$( yourself.
2) Subs start to drop.
3) CCP makes changes.
The changes to the barges cited as a change due to discussion can be directly correlated to YEARS of whine threads discussing how no tank could be successfully added to them without ganking their ability to mine making some non-mining ships competitive w/ better tanks. Coupled with this were years to whine threads about being ganked so easily. And finally, at the height of the gankage dedicated miners just dropping subs. I know many who left and were never seen again because CCP continued to ignore the rampant abuse of miners on multiple fronts:bots, ganking, etc.
Grath and me already mentioned it above - the implementation of Abathur's changes to supercapitals over Nozh's plan (never not target paint motherships) was - as far as anyone can tell - only due to massive forum outrage.
As the whole controversy happened before any changes were deployed to TQ it seems unlikely that cancelled subscriptions played a role in CCP's decision. I'm a NPC corp alt, any argument I make is invalid. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7550
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 13:49:00 -
[41] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:mining barge buffs I once cited that as an example of CCP being in favor of hi-sec lifestyle because they were afraid of sub loss, and was told by other forum posters that they were planning the changes to mining barges anyways before hulkageddon. oh those other forum posters were also bads So does that mean CCP supports hi-sec activities because it fears subscription loss? I mean if CCP wasn't afraid of all those miners on the forums were going to quit, then there was no need to make the barge change? And if that is true does it really mean that CCP supports the hi-sec, carebear, NPC corp lifestyle? Obviously, if the forum rage got CCP to make the change, then the gankers obviously did not make much of a counter argument in the numbers needed to cancel out the vote so to say. At one point EVE was much harsher then it was at present. Endless whines by carebears have resulted in increasing safety and bad carebear-oriented expansions introduced with no corroborating boosts in subscription numbers. Likewise, forum complaints convinced CCP to needlessly buff barges in the face of 'mass unsubs' which never happened and never materialized. Clearly, forum complaints are a powerful tool because they are able to convince CCP of things that are plainly untrue, like the "carebear dollar" myth. After Incarna hit the floor, CCP had truth forced upon it and since then it has been updating PVP ships and mechanics (like bounty system, crimewatch and wardecs). The important thing is to continue to expunge the 'carebear dollar' myth from CCP's heads to keep them from being manipulated by selfish gold farmers from inadvertantly destroying EVE with their risk-adverse greed. I leave that sort of behavior for those who would lie for self-benefit.
Were the tier 3 BCs and the Destroyer buffs that preceded the mining barge buff for the carebears as well? Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
152
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 14:01:00 -
[42] - Quote
Quote:And if that is true does it really mean that CCP supports the hi-sec, carebear, NPC corp lifestyle?
CCP supports this game, all styles of gameplay involved. That means, they have to think many times, before they change something in favor of someones wish, because sometimes groups have conflicts of interests. Whole thing is similar to politics. New CQ prototype |

baltec1
Bat Country
5011
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 14:10:00 -
[43] - Quote
Pohbis wrote:baltec1 wrote:Pohbis wrote:No, what some people tried to fool them into thinking, was that people really cared if it was a couple of million below or above the profitability line to gank them. "No CCP, really, if people go full tank we wont destroyer-gank just for lulz. We swear! Please!"  Funny how the ganking more or less vanished when it became unprofitable to do. Funny how you skate over the "couple of million" part. If you want to continue arguing that it was done for the chance of a measy profit, and not because it was a low-cost, low-effort way to get some lulz, please, go ahead. We both know that it hasn't dropped significantly because it became unprofitable, but because it became too unprofitable. More importantly, it requires more people, hence ::effort::, now. But go on, keep explaining to us how Hulkageddon was all about profits 
Hulkageddon prizes were worth tens of billions. The interdictions netted us hundreds of billions.
Hulkageddon will most likely happen again however the far more destructive interdictions will not as there is no profit in it. I suppose you are one of those who say the freighter ganking is also for the lulz and not the trillions of isk. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5011
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 14:12:00 -
[44] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
Were the tier 3 BCs and the Destroyer buffs that preceded the mining barge buff for the carebears as well?
Its funny how people forget about the insurance removal that also came with them and the fact it is now more expensive than when we used tempests. |

Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
279
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 14:27:00 -
[45] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Hulkageddon prizes were worth tens of billions. The interdictions netted us hundreds of billions.
Hulkageddon will most likely happen again however the far more destructive interdictions will not as there is no profit in it. I suppose you are one of those who say the freighter ganking is also for the lulz and not the trillions of isk. No, I am not. Because unlike barge ganking which was low investment, low effort and not for profit ( and we're not talking market schemes or prizes here, actual profit by ganking ), freighter ganking requires coordination, read; effort, a sizeable ISK investment and is not guaranteed to give you what you want, loot or modules.
Freighter ganking is an entirely different beast to what barge ganking was. CCP merely brought barge ganking in line with freighter ganking. You can still do it, but it's not something a solo player does for the lulz 'cause he is bored.
|

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
703
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 14:29:00 -
[46] - Quote
Vexen Lyre wrote:La Nariz wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:mining barge buffs Can't emphasize this enough the forum whining got mining barges their unwarranted EHP buffs. I thought it was because your alliance sponsored a massive in-game event that demonstrated just how easy and cheap it was to gank barges with T1 destroyers? you burned that candle to a stump, meight. that's why they buffed barges, forum whine was mostly ancillary.
And what about all of the other years that this event occurred yet was not sponsored by us? The forum whine of "he kil my 325mil ship with 7mil ship" is what did it. Also don't forget the part that they could have tanked their ships and made themselves unprofitable to gank in the first place. The mining barge EHP buff was to specifically tell players "No, you cannot play the game that way." This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
279
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 14:42:00 -
[47] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:The mining barge EHP buff was to specifically tell players "No, you cannot play the game that way." Tell us, when did CCP remove your ability to shoot at barges?
You say people could just have tanked barges to become unprofitable.
Hmmm. Now they are unprofitable. So were tanking mods CCP's way of telling you "you couldn't play that way"? |

Vexen Lyre
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 14:50:00 -
[48] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Vexen Lyre wrote:La Nariz wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:mining barge buffs Can't emphasize this enough the forum whining got mining barges their unwarranted EHP buffs. I thought it was because your alliance sponsored a massive in-game event that demonstrated just how easy and cheap it was to gank barges with T1 destroyers? you burned that candle to a stump, meight. that's why they buffed barges, forum whine was mostly ancillary. And what about all of the other years that this event occurred yet was not sponsored by us? The forum whine of "he kil my 325mil ship with 7mil ship" is what did it. Also don't forget the part that they could have tanked their ships and made themselves unprofitable to gank in the first place. The mining barge EHP buff was to specifically tell players "No, you cannot play the game that way."
well I don't know, were they not whining on the forums in previous years? was there the added factor of your CEO getting banned and goonswarm retaliating with a campaign of disruptive play?
also the retriever's tank was a papery husk. if a fail-fit can't survive a gank in a >0.7 system then it probably does need a buff to EHP to protect clueless noobs. Docked in Jita - Moon 4 - Caldari Navy Assembly Plant |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
703
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 15:53:00 -
[49] - Quote
^: The retriever yeah I agree but please show me the 2 month old newbie flying a hulk/mack. They don't exist those are not newbie ships.
Pohbis wrote:La Nariz wrote:The mining barge EHP buff was to specifically tell players "No, you cannot play the game that way." Tell us, when did CCP remove your ability to shoot at barges? You say people could just have tanked barges to become unprofitable. Hmmm. Now they are unprofitable. So were tanking mods CCP's way of telling you "you couldn't play that way"?
CCP Soundwave saying ganking shouldn't be profitable. That's a big "no you cannot play that way." This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
269
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:04:00 -
[50] - Quote
Pohbis wrote:La Nariz wrote:The mining barge EHP buff was to specifically tell players "No, you cannot play the game that way." Tell us, when did CCP remove your ability to shoot at barges? You say people could just have tanked barges to become unprofitable. Hmmm. Now they are unprofitable. So were tanking mods CCP's way of telling you "you couldn't play that way"? Yes, now they are all unprofitable to gank, where before the smart ones that forego yield for tank were unprofitable and we left them alone to go after the "MAX YIELD" or bust tards. Believe me, there were far more of the "max yield" types than the "I better protect my Hulk with some tanking mods." Your whole argument that "tanking mods is CCP's way of telling you "you couldn't play that way" is just idiotic.
Someone still has to show a highsec killmail that has an Exhumer that has forgone any yield for tank, from any of the Hulkageddons.(non wardeck) The simple fact that THERE AREN'T ANY is telling. You've got to remember that these are just simple miners. These are people of the land. The common clay of New Eden. You know... morons. |

Vexen Lyre
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:06:00 -
[51] - Quote
It's actually possible to have the exhumer prereqs in under 2 months now.
And yes of course they'll suck but remember the noob mentality, bigger and shinier is better. Docked in Jita - Moon 4 - Caldari Navy Assembly Plant |

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1079
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:10:00 -
[52] - Quote
Oh jeez now people actually have to pick their ganks now, instead of ganking every barge for lulz. Are you really shocked they nerfed ganking after Hulkageddon/Burn Eden(or w/e it was called)? This is what happens when you abuse a mechanic to the point of redundancy. |

Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
279
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:11:00 -
[53] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:CCP Soundwave saying ganking shouldn't be profitable. That's a big "no you cannot play that way." But you can still gank barges.
If you want to complain that it is not profitable, that's a whole other level of complaining.
Ganking freighters isn't profitable either. Ganking the right freighters is.
It's CCP telling you to pick the right targets. Put some effort into it. Risk/Effort/Investment vs Reward.
CCP never intended for it to be profitable to gank a hull with basic fittings, and the reason why should be obvious to anyone who hasn't got their head stuck in the entitlement-sand. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
703
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:14:00 -
[54] - Quote
Vexen Lyre wrote:It's actually possible to have the exhumer prereqs in under 2 months now.
And yes of course they'll suck but remember the noob mentality, bigger and shinier is better.
Okay paste the training plan with remaps and all right here for us as well as the income plan to generate enough isk to fund the ship all in the same period of time. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
269
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:22:00 -
[55] - Quote
Pohbis wrote:La Nariz wrote:CCP Soundwave saying ganking shouldn't be profitable. That's a big "no you cannot play that way." But you can still gank barges. If you want to complain that it is not profitable, that's a whole other level of complaining. Ganking freighters isn't profitable either. Ganking the right freighters is. It's CCP telling you to pick the right targets. Put some effort into it. Risk/Effort/Investment vs Reward. CCP never intended for it to be profitable to gank a hull with basic fittings, and the reason why should be obvious to anyone who hasn't got their head stuck in the entitlement-sand. See, the thing was, we did "pick our target," before. We left alone the ones that actually "TANKED" their barges. The fact that only 1 in 100 actually did tank their barge, just made it look like we were "indiscriminately" ganking every barge and exhumer we could target our blasters on. You've got to remember that these are just simple miners. These are people of the land. The common clay of New Eden. You know... morons. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
703
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:23:00 -
[56] - Quote
Pohbis wrote:La Nariz wrote:CCP Soundwave saying ganking shouldn't be profitable. That's a big "no you cannot play that way." But you can still gank barges. If you want to complain that it is not profitable, that's a whole other level of complaining. Ganking freighters isn't profitable either. Ganking the right freighters is. It's CCP telling you to pick the right targets. Put some effort into it. Risk/Effort/Investment vs Reward.CCP never intended for it to be profitable to gank a hull with basic fittings, and the reason why should be obvious to anyone who hasn't got their head stuck in the entitlement-sand.
The bolded part is plain untruth. There already was much effort required and risk:reward in target picking. You'd have to have a warp in, an alt to move your stash of ships, a scanning alt to make sure the ship wasn't tanked and estimate your chances of success. You'd need to do ask yourself if the drop chance is worth the gank attempt. Much like hauling the ganker had control of their risk:reward ratios before the massive ganking nerfs. That thing you said about freighters is the same exact thing applied to miners. Those that tanked were not profitable, those that didn't were profitable. It's not about a plain hull being profitable its about people forgoing tank, maximizing their risk, to increase their yeild, maximizing reward. It was balanced high risk : high reward, now its been smashed by CCP, low risk : high reward because barges are now intrinsically tanked.
CCP never intended for supercapitals to be used as they are today but you don't see any huge nerfs and massive "rebalancing" occurring. CCP never intended for nullsec to turn into garbage but you don't see any huge nerfs and massive "rebalancing" occurring. CCP never intended for lowsec to turn into garbage but you don't see any huge nerfs and massive "rebalancing" occurring. CCP never intended for AFK mining but you don't see any huge nerfs and massive "rebalancing" occurring. Do you see why CCP never intended "X" is a bad argument? They are using players to create content for their game so their intentions have no bearing on what is going on or how something is used. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

Vexen Lyre
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:26:00 -
[57] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Vexen Lyre wrote:It's actually possible to have the exhumer prereqs in under 2 months now.
And yes of course they'll suck but remember the noob mentality, bigger and shinier is better. Okay paste the training plan with remaps and all right here for us as well as the income plan to generate enough isk to fund the ship all in the same period of time.
Spaceship Command IV Industry I Industry II Industry III Industry IV Industry V Science IV Mining III Mining IV Astrogeology I Astrogeology II Astrogeology III Astrogeology IV Astrogeology V Exhumers I Mining Barge I Mining Barge II Mining Barge III Mining Barge IV Mining Barge V Mining V Refining I Refining II Refining III Refining IV Scordite Processing I Scordite Processing II Scordite Processing III Scordite Processing IV
no remap = 57 days. getting a barge and mining for several hours a day pays for it. Docked in Jita - Moon 4 - Caldari Navy Assembly Plant |

Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
279
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:35:00 -
[58] - Quote
Falin Whalen wrote:Your whole argument that "tanking mods is CCP's way of telling you "you couldn't play that way" is just idiotic. That wasn't my argument. Someone tried to pass off CCP making barges unprofitable to gank as "CCP telling him how to play".
By all means, go ahead and gank the barges fitting Ore Strip Miners. Do you have any kind of argument as to why mining ships should be the only T2 fitted ships in hi-sec that are profitable to gank?
You can be certain that if people suddenly started ganking T2 fitted pirate and faction mission BS, that CCP would do the same.
It has nothing to do with CCP telling you how you can or can't play, and everything to do with CCP enforcing their vision of how hi-sec ganking should work in EVE.
Unless of course you want to argue that any rule and mechanic in EVE is CCP "telling you ho to play"  |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
703
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:49:00 -
[59] - Quote
Vexen Lyre wrote: no remap = 57 days. getting a barge and mining for several hours a day pays for it.
Do the math, finish proving your point. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

Vexen Lyre
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:54:00 -
[60] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Vexen Lyre wrote: no remap = 57 days. getting a barge and mining for several hours a day pays for it.
Do the math, finish proving your point.
that needs more than 2 seconds in evemon i'm kind of losing interest in internet argument.
rich noob buys PLEX. I win now? Docked in Jita - Moon 4 - Caldari Navy Assembly Plant |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |