| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 .. 76 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 36 post(s) |
Kyle Caldrel
   |
Posted - 2005.10.08 02:44:00 -
[871]
Josh, with the recent MC announcement of Gem, i would suggest that you at least put a war marker over it.
|
zincol
|
Posted - 2005.10.08 08:37:00 -
[872]
Gem is still CI,COE just have pos's and dont claim gem at all,or otherwise any 1 could build 3-4 pos's and claim a region.
CI/sas ect is friendly to mc also. so as i see it it's messy and that mc r killin all the unwanted ex-FA out of gem.
|
Seleene
|
Posted - 2005.10.08 10:05:00 -
[873]
Edited by: Seleene on 08/10/2005 10:05:38
Josh can do with the map as he sees fit. You won't see any MC in this thread in a ****ing contest about labels. The players of the area are in communication and the reality of the situation will sort itself out soon enough.
-
We're outnumbered! That simplifies the problem! |
Cartiff
|
Posted - 2005.10.08 10:16:00 -
[874]
well said
Cartiff, CEO
Euphoria Released
NBSI 4TW
"Uggs386 > omfg i like little boys"
|
Komolov
|
Posted - 2005.10.09 09:11:00 -
[875]
 Originally by: Cartiff
i demand more warzone markers on the map, WAR = fun
Move your ass to Tenerifis and put it on fire. This will help a lot to mapmaker :)
--------------------
Sincerely yours,
Dmitry V. Komolov
FSP-B |
Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2005.10.09 11:26:00 -
[876]
Edited by: Destroyer Draxx on 09/10/2005 11:27:27
Stain region still contested :?
So Far So Good....So What |
Ngozi
|
Posted - 2005.10.09 16:27:00 -
[877]
Yes its contested. Why not?
|
Creamster
|
Posted - 2005.10.09 16:49:00 -
[878]
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx
Edited by: Destroyer Draxx on 09/10/2005 11:27:27
Stain region still contested :?
I also find it strange that Stain is still contested. We roam around every day, kill what we can, haven't seen SA fleets or even decent size gangs for weeks. Yes there are SA folks staying docked and minding their own business but no military resistance. This caused us to move our operations further south. What SE has to do to have Stain uncontested? Would destroying SA pos'es help?
___________
2005.09.04:"After the 7 days SE corporations will be removed from the said regions" (Q)
XB killboard |
Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2005.10.09 20:30:00 -
[879]
Smite did what u did, but Stain was not contested m8. This is not the part of the forums to discuss bout it so I ll stfu 
So Far So Good....So What |
Nick Curso
|
Posted - 2005.10.09 21:17:00 -
[880]
Well unless XB have moved outta 4gq and about 3 systems around it errm can anyone say smite again? and how much SE clamed they wernt a prob.
|
Elenia Kheynes
|
Posted - 2005.10.09 23:38:00 -
[881]
Originally by: Komolov
Originally by: Cartiff
i demand more warzone markers on the map, WAR = fun
Move your ass to Tenerifis and put it on fire. This will help a lot to mapmaker :)
There is nothing to put on fire in Tenerifis atm. Otherwise I would be busy burning it. 
Dear friendly customer... Can I have your money ?
|
Cartiff
|
Posted - 2005.10.10 02:04:00 -
[882]
Tene is boring
Cartiff, CEO
Euphoria Released
NBSI 4TW
"Uggs386 > omfg i like little boys"
|
Creamster
|
Posted - 2005.10.10 02:51:00 -
[883]
Originally by: Nick Curso
Well unless XB have moved outta 4gq and about 3 systems around it errm can anyone say smite again? and how much SE clamed they wernt a prob.
Current situation in Stain is quite simple: there are two alliances, one has an organized pvp fleet out every day, the other doesn't. However SA is very strong in Isoteria and Paragon, that's why we prefer fighting there instead of camping npc stations in DSS, LGK, 9RQ, G-ME
___________
2005.09.04:"After the 7 days SE corporations will be removed from the said regions" (Q)
XB killboard |
Komolov
|
Posted - 2005.10.10 06:48:00 -
[884]
Originally by: Cartiff
Tene is boring
Ok, lots of ATUKs expected in Cache. Fell free to join the fun.
--------------------
Sincerely yours,
Dmitry V. Komolov
FSP-B |
Elenia Kheynes
|
Posted - 2005.10.10 11:39:00 -
[885]
Detorid looks better, but it's not really close from any station 
Dear friendly customer... Can I have your money ?
|
Edward Black
|
Posted - 2005.10.11 18:14:00 -
[886]
No decent SA gangs to fight eh O-o
Daily IE-Ex alone foots a 10 or more person gang for atleast 5 hours and often more.
And i know a few other corps do similar, if you'd look a bit harder you might find a fight 
Btw creamster, everytime bar one iv run into you with even numbers you ran 
Oh well, my point is that Stain inst really contested anymore.
|
Nick Curso
|
Posted - 2005.10.11 20:51:00 -
[887]
Maybe a war zone marker for stain?
|
IcedBach Jr
|
Posted - 2005.10.11 23:54:00 -
[888]
Originally by: Creamster
Originally by: Nick Curso
Well unless XB have moved outta 4gq and about 3 systems around it errm can anyone say smite again? and how much SE clamed they wernt a prob.
Current situation in Stain is quite simple: there are two alliances, one has an organized pvp fleet out every day, the other doesn't. However SA is very strong in Isoteria and Paragon, that's why we prefer fighting there instead of camping npc stations in DSS, LGK, 9RQ, G-ME
Roaming around super safes is not exactly a reason to contest a whole region, and btw, if all of SA would be in 4GQ instead of doing things in 3 regions maybe some more pilots would be stationed in that system, how on earth can you have that region contested.
Praeludium to success |
Creamster
|
Posted - 2005.10.12 01:06:00 -
[889]
Originally by: IcedBach Jr
Roaming around super safes is not exactly a reason to contest a whole region, and btw, if all of SA would be in 4GQ instead of doing things in 3 regions maybe some more pilots would be stationed in that system, how on earth can you have that region contested.
You sir can clearly see the results of our roaming on our killboard. Btw today was the first day SA had a fleet in 4GQ in weeks, nice progress in uncontesting, but still I wonder if you guys are up for a fight or just trying to scare us with your numbers. 
___________
2005.09.04:"After the 7 days SE corporations will be removed from the said regions" (Q)
XB killboard |
Vince Draken
|
Posted - 2005.10.12 02:09:00 -
[890]
Originally by: Creamster
Originally by: IcedBach Jr
Roaming around super safes is not exactly a reason to contest a whole region, and btw, if all of SA would be in 4GQ instead of doing things in 3 regions maybe some more pilots would be stationed in that system, how on earth can you have that region contested.
You sir can clearly see the results of our roaming on our killboard. Btw today was the first day SA had a fleet in 4GQ in weeks, nice progress in uncontesting, but still I wonder if you guys are up for a fight or just trying to scare us with your numbers.
If all you got left is posting on the map section bragging about killmails in a pathetic hope to get some form of recognition, you've already lost pal. A region isnt contested with inferior numbers that employ the usual gurilla tactics. Espicially a region with NPC stations...
The above thoughts and statements are IC and should be taken as such. |
Creamster
|
Posted - 2005.10.12 02:32:00 -
[891]
It's contested allright if superior numbers are sitting docked or simply are not present in the region. Oh well what i know, i better go back to my guerilla super safe spot roaming
___________
2005.09.04:"After the 7 days SE corporations will be removed from the said regions" (Q)
XB killboard |
j0rz
|
Posted - 2005.10.12 03:42:00 -
[892]
SA space is still contested by SE, i roam through there everyday and inever see SA fleets. I wish se the ebst of luck, map maker keep up the good work :)
Such is Life
|
Camador
|
Posted - 2005.10.12 18:07:00 -
[893]
SE is the dominating force around 4GQ. whereas SA have a heavy prescence in esoteria and paragon. minor SA prescence around 9rq and upper stain.
______________________________
|
Shin Ra
|
Posted - 2005.10.12 19:47:00 -
[894]
I wouldn't say Stain is contested. Its a warzone deffinatly (centered around 4GQ) where SE seems to be based.
This from a non biased outside opinion
|
Kleric
|
Posted - 2005.10.12 20:21:00 -
[895]
Staying at SS's and docked in a system when you even outnumber the opponent isnt "contesting a region" AFAIK
99% of what i post is bull**** and in no way represent my corp or alliance |
Krazow
|
Posted - 2005.10.13 01:40:00 -
[896]
Why does the map show The Five as controlling most of the eastern regions? Clearly this is not the case. I'm sitting here scratching my head trying to figure out how an alliance can control without contest the regions that The Five control (according to Josh's map) with only having sovereignty in 2 of the regions, and only sovereignty over 3 systems.
Am I missing something or does the map not reflect the situation accurately?
|
Pepperami
|
Posted - 2005.10.13 02:43:00 -
[897]
Originally by: Krazow
Why does the map show The Five as controlling most of the eastern regions? Clearly this is not the case. I'm sitting here scratching my head trying to figure out how an alliance can control without contest the regions that The Five control (according to Josh's map) with only having sovereignty in 2 of the regions, and only sovereignty over 3 systems.
Am I missing something or does the map not reflect the situation accurately?
Due to the way sovereignty works (badly), it's easy to stick up POSes before downtime and claim sovereignty when you're not a dominent force in an area. If you actually fly in those regions you'll realise that they are completely under .5. control, the warzone markers are sufficiant to show RA's "presence".
|
DesertKing
|
Posted - 2005.10.13 08:53:00 -
[898]
Originally by: Pepperami
Due to the way sovereignty works (badly), it's easy to stick up POSes before downtime and claim sovereignty when you're not a dominent force in an area. If you actually fly in those regions you'll realise that they are completely under .5. control, the warzone markers are sufficiant to show RA's "presence".
These days "sovereignty" means dominant forces. Somewhere. It does not mean defending actual space.
|
Hassis
|
Posted - 2005.10.13 11:03:00 -
[899]
Originally by: Krazow
Why does the map show The Five as controlling most of the eastern regions? Clearly this is not the case. I'm sitting here scratching my head trying to figure out how an alliance can control without contest the regions that The Five control (according to Josh's map) with only having sovereignty in 2 of the regions, and only sovereignty over 3 systems.
Am I missing something or does the map not reflect the situation accurately?
You are right, but its hard to find anyone from Red alliance or Teh Five who bother to post intel about 5/RA regions on forums :)
We'd better continue kill each other
UA Industry :: We produce frags |
Hast
|
Posted - 2005.10.13 13:50:00 -
[900]
Originally by: Hassis
Originally by: Krazow
Why does the map show The Five as controlling most of the eastern regions? Clearly this is not the case. I'm sitting here scratching my head trying to figure out how an alliance can control without contest the regions that The Five control (according to Josh's map) with only having sovereignty in 2 of the regions, and only sovereignty over 3 systems.
Am I missing something or does the map not reflect the situation accurately?
You are right, but its hard to find anyone from Red alliance or Teh Five who bother to post intel about 5/RA regions on forums :)
We'd better continue kill each other
Hassis 4tw
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 .. 76 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |