| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Dave Stark
1811
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:10:00 -
[31] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Veterans taking advantage of mechanics intended to help rookies (like no ganking in rookie system belts) is the foundation of the whole "NPC corp" phenomenon. Let's get rid of NPC corps as a whole and help the rookies out by driving these creatures from their belts. You bring a good point Dave Stark at the perils of compromising on the issue of NPC corps - it just leads to further problems.
or you could just move the starting systems away from the trade hubs. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
78
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:11:00 -
[32] - Quote
Can I ask you a serious question...
Do you think CCP is going to enact changes that will detrimentally affect a large portion of their player base?
We discussed this in my thread of how the forums caused CCP to change the game when it comes to mining barges being buffed because of the threads complaing about ganking.
Can you imagine the threadnaughts that will ensue if your changes were enacted? "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Dave Stark
1811
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:12:00 -
[33] - Quote
Sol Weinstein wrote:To clarify, by me stating "cannot mine outside of 1.0/0.9/0.8" it would also mean that PRCs (Player Run Corps) would NOT be able to mine in those systems. Or rent offices. Or lab slots... etc... etc... etc...
Thank you.
or we could let ccp use the time to add something to the game rather than pointlessly changing a system that doesn't need changing? "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." |

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:13:00 -
[34] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:It was a personal attack. The reason that caused you to attack me isn't even important.
Yes, those systems DO get mined out. But that doesn't mean there shouldn't be a change in the system. Belts can be added. Or [other things] can be done to change that fact.
This is how discussion works. You start with an idea and go from there.
Thank you.
the mining system doesn't need changing. why would we change a perfectly fine system to accommodate an even worse system being introduced? not quite sure you understand how "improvements" work. your suggestions add nothing to the game.
I disagree that my suggestions add nothing to the game. It would add a protection to PRCs from people who abuse the NPC Corporation Exploit.
I won't even suggest that you yourself are abusing the system. Because, that would be a personal attack on you. I will have faith that you have never once used your protection inside an NPC corp to place a 100k bounty on someone with no risk to yourself or your main characters. Just like you don't use the same character in the NPC corp to protect your main character from getting any backlash inside the game.
My tongue is firmly planted in my cheek as I say those last two sentences.
Thank you.
|

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:14:00 -
[35] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:To clarify, by me stating "cannot mine outside of 1.0/0.9/0.8" it would also mean that PRCs (Player Run Corps) would NOT be able to mine in those systems. Or rent offices. Or lab slots... etc... etc... etc...
Thank you. or we could let ccp use the time to add something to the game rather than pointlessly changing a system that doesn't need changing?
I am one person who thinks the system needs changing. This thread is created to find others who think the same thing. Even if they do not agree with ALL the things I posted.
Thank you.
|

Archa4 Badasaz
Viziam Amarr Empire
33
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:16:00 -
[36] - Quote
Well, simple response: FU. I like to sit in NPC corp - don't have to worry about morons declaring wars out of no reason and ganking me with no consequences. This char is purely PVE oriented, and I am not interested in any kind of PVP. If you don't like it - that should not be my problem. Go find other players rady to PVP and fight with them. GL! |

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:16:00 -
[37] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:Can I ask you a serious question...
Do you think CCP is going to enact changes that will detrimentally affect a large portion of their player base?
We discussed this in my thread of how the forums caused CCP to change the game when it comes to mining barges being buffed because of the threads complaing about ganking.
Can you imagine the threadnaughts that will ensue if your changes were enacted?
I'm not sure what is going to happen. This is why the post was made. I think changes need to be made so I created a post about it. It's the first step. One small post for PRCs; one giant leap for a better gameplay experience. Gotta start somewhere.
Thank you.
|

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:18:00 -
[38] - Quote
Archa4 Badasaz wrote:Well, simple response: FU. I like to sit in NPC corp - don't have to worry about morons declaring wars out of no reason and ganking me with no consequences. This char is purely PVE oriented, and I am not interested in any kind of PVP. If you don't like it - that should not be my problem. Go find other players rady to PVP and fight with them. GL!
This is not about PVP. This is about players in NPC corporations using it to abuse the systems in the game, such as bounties.
Your opinion is noted as a negative response to my thread. I thank you for your input and hope you continue to enjoy your play style.
Thank you.
Oh, and so we are all clear... what do you mean by "FU" ?? I sure hope it doesn't mean what I think it does. I would hate to think you are personally attacking me based on my opinion. |

Dave Stark
1811
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:18:00 -
[39] - Quote
Sol Weinstein wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:It was a personal attack. The reason that caused you to attack me isn't even important.
Yes, those systems DO get mined out. But that doesn't mean there shouldn't be a change in the system. Belts can be added. Or [other things] can be done to change that fact.
This is how discussion works. You start with an idea and go from there.
Thank you.
the mining system doesn't need changing. why would we change a perfectly fine system to accommodate an even worse system being introduced? not quite sure you understand how "improvements" work. your suggestions add nothing to the game. I disagree that my suggestions add nothing to the game. It would add a protection to PRCs from people who abuse the NPC Corporation Exploit. I won't even suggest that you yourself are abusing the system. Because, that would be a personal attack on you. I will have faith that you have never once used your protection inside an NPC corp to place a 100k bounty on someone with no risk to yourself or your main characters. Just like you don't use the same character in the NPC corp to protect your main character from getting any backlash inside the game. My tongue is firmly planted in my cheek as I say those last two sentences. Your sig: "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." Thank you.
this *is* my main character. i don't use an NPC corp alt to post/do my dirty work. i use an NPC corp character as my main character because the simple fact is; player corps have nothing to offer me.
i fail to see how using an npc corp character to shield a player from backlash is any different to using an alt in a player corp that they never log in, just create a character on an account, put it in a random player corp and send it isk to create bounties. not letting npc corp player use the bounty feature doesn't stop people being able to be "immune to backlash" it just means they have to click 2 more buttons to place a bounty.
it would be quicker, easier, and less hassle to just remove NPC corps if you truly have an issue with them. because your list of "demands" really are ill thought out and terrible. there's no getting around that. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air The Unthinkables
2823
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:18:00 -
[40] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:Do you think CCP is going to enact changes that will detrimentally affect a large portion of their player base?
We discussed this in my thread of how the forums caused CCP to change the game when it comes to mining barges being buffed because of the threads complaing about ganking.
Can you imagine the threadnaughts that will ensue if your changes were enacted? CCP are more amenable to reason after the successive commercial failures of Tyrannis/Incursion/Incarna exposed the 'carebear myth' that the PVE-exclusive demographic are a driving force in EVE's playerbase or business model. Since then they have been concentrating on PvP iterations (ships) and PvP mechanics (wardecs, bounty systems) and CCP Seagull's devblog about 2013 continuing to expand on 'emergent content' and not 'new PvE zones'. Since this has been met with EVE's resumed growth, as you like to point out, this gives us a bright sign in EVE's future direction. |

Whitehound
614
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:20:00 -
[41] - Quote
Sol Weinstein wrote:I disagree that my suggestions add nothing to the game. True. They add a lot of limitations to it. Heartless, selfish, mean and unnecessary limitations, which is far worse than nothing. SCAM CAT - Titan Jump - I was there - Goon Dog |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air The Unthinkables
2823
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:21:00 -
[42] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Veterans taking advantage of mechanics intended to help rookies (like no ganking in rookie system belts) is the foundation of the whole "NPC corp" phenomenon. Let's get rid of NPC corps as a whole and help the rookies out by driving these creatures from their belts. You bring a good point Dave Stark at the perils of compromising on the issue of NPC corps - it just leads to further problems. or you could just move the starting systems away from the trade hubs. And the NPC corp miners will follow. We've had other NPC corp posters go on about mining out the rookie systems because of the free anti-gank security on top of their free anti-wardec security. They felt it was fair trade to mine out the rookie systems because the rookies got to listen to his gameplay advise on how to achieve the ultimate riskadverse veld mining dream. |

Vexen Lyre
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:22:00 -
[43] - Quote
It's high time CCP dealt with this NPC corp scourge for good. Docked in Jita - Moon 4 - Caldari Navy Assembly Plant |

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:23:00 -
[44] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:It was a personal attack. The reason that caused you to attack me isn't even important.
Yes, those systems DO get mined out. But that doesn't mean there shouldn't be a change in the system. Belts can be added. Or [other things] can be done to change that fact.
This is how discussion works. You start with an idea and go from there.
Thank you.
the mining system doesn't need changing. why would we change a perfectly fine system to accommodate an even worse system being introduced? not quite sure you understand how "improvements" work. your suggestions add nothing to the game. I disagree that my suggestions add nothing to the game. It would add a protection to PRCs from people who abuse the NPC Corporation Exploit. I won't even suggest that you yourself are abusing the system. Because, that would be a personal attack on you. I will have faith that you have never once used your protection inside an NPC corp to place a 100k bounty on someone with no risk to yourself or your main characters. Just like you don't use the same character in the NPC corp to protect your main character from getting any backlash inside the game. My tongue is firmly planted in my cheek as I say those last two sentences. Your sig: "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." Thank you. this *is* my main character. i don't use an NPC corp alt to post/do my dirty work. i use an NPC corp character as my main character because the simple fact is; player corps have nothing to offer me. i fail to see how using an npc corp character to shield a player from backlash is any different to using an alt in a player corp that they never log in, just create a character on an account, put it in a random player corp and send it isk to create bounties. not letting npc corp player use the bounty feature doesn't stop people being able to be "immune to backlash" it just means they have to click 2 more buttons to place a bounty. it would be quicker, easier, and less hassle to just remove NPC corps if you truly have an issue with them. because your list of "demands" really are ill thought out and terrible. there's no getting around that.
This post wasn't about multiple characters on the same account created to avoid the system. This post is about people (maybe not you specifically) using the 'protection' of an NPC corp to act like a player in a PRC. Your response is talking about something totally different. Feel free to make your own thread regarding multiple characters on the same account (or other accounts) created with the intent to abuse the system.
A second character (on the same account or other account) should be used to play in a different style than the others. Or it can be used to play the game the exact same way but with a different identity. A second account should not be used to abuse the systems of the game. But, once again, feel free to make your own thread discussing this.
Thank you.
|

Piugattuk
Lima beans Corp
328
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:23:00 -
[45] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:Wahh?  Why is it, people insist on thinking they are the only ones with an opinion? You need to play more, and worry less about what other players are doing.... This+
The first 2 I can see maybe, everything else is not any good, people have alts that do many things for them and could you imagine if we all had one toon then people could grief you to death leading to quitting which CCP is a business they are not gonna change this besides you know how many people do pay for alts in NPC corps to do things for their main...not gonna happen. |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
78
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:24:00 -
[46] - Quote
Sol Weinstein wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:Can I ask you a serious question...
Do you think CCP is going to enact changes that will detrimentally affect a large portion of their player base?
We discussed this in my thread of how the forums caused CCP to change the game when it comes to mining barges being buffed because of the threads complaing about ganking.
Can you imagine the threadnaughts that will ensue if your changes were enacted? I'm not sure what is going to happen. This is why the post was made. I think changes need to be made so I created a post about it. It's the first step. One small post for PRCs; one giant leap for a better gameplay experience. Gotta start somewhere. Thank you.
Well you have to keep in mind if people are in NPC corps and using that system a great deal that they must really enjoy the benefits of said system.
When you propose major changes to said system, you must realize that people are not going to like said changes and there will have some major resistance to such a suggestion.
If you had taken some time to consider "Will the majority of EvE player accept this change?" then you have to come to conlusion at least the people in the NPC corps would not accept this change, then you have to consider how much of the player base will reject your ideas.
And you can't get to that point simply by posting a forum post. You get some idea, but people don't come out of the woodwork until something really bothers them. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:25:00 -
[47] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:I disagree that my suggestions add nothing to the game. True. They add a lot of limitations to it. Heartless, selfish, mean and unnecessary limitations, which is far worse than nothing.
That is a wonderful opinion. And I feel that some of the things NPC corp players are allowed to do also add hearless, selfish, mean, and unnecessary limitation to the playstyle of others. This is why the thread was created.
Your negative opinion is noted. Thank you for your time and input.
|

Dave Stark
1811
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:27:00 -
[48] - Quote
Sol Weinstein wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:It was a personal attack. The reason that caused you to attack me isn't even important.
Yes, those systems DO get mined out. But that doesn't mean there shouldn't be a change in the system. Belts can be added. Or [other things] can be done to change that fact.
This is how discussion works. You start with an idea and go from there.
Thank you.
the mining system doesn't need changing. why would we change a perfectly fine system to accommodate an even worse system being introduced? not quite sure you understand how "improvements" work. your suggestions add nothing to the game. I disagree that my suggestions add nothing to the game. It would add a protection to PRCs from people who abuse the NPC Corporation Exploit. I won't even suggest that you yourself are abusing the system. Because, that would be a personal attack on you. I will have faith that you have never once used your protection inside an NPC corp to place a 100k bounty on someone with no risk to yourself or your main characters. Just like you don't use the same character in the NPC corp to protect your main character from getting any backlash inside the game. My tongue is firmly planted in my cheek as I say those last two sentences. Your sig: "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." Thank you. this *is* my main character. i don't use an NPC corp alt to post/do my dirty work. i use an NPC corp character as my main character because the simple fact is; player corps have nothing to offer me. i fail to see how using an npc corp character to shield a player from backlash is any different to using an alt in a player corp that they never log in, just create a character on an account, put it in a random player corp and send it isk to create bounties. not letting npc corp player use the bounty feature doesn't stop people being able to be "immune to backlash" it just means they have to click 2 more buttons to place a bounty. it would be quicker, easier, and less hassle to just remove NPC corps if you truly have an issue with them. because your list of "demands" really are ill thought out and terrible. there's no getting around that. This post wasn't about multiple characters on the same account created to avoid the system. This post is about people (maybe not you specifically) using the 'protection' of an NPC corp to act like a player in a PRC. Your response is talking about something totally different. Feel free to make your own thread regarding multiple characters on the same account (or other accounts) created with the intent to abuse the system. A second character (on the same account or other account) should be used to play in a different style than the others. Or it can be used to play the game the exact same way but with a different identity. A second account should not be used to abuse the systems of the game. But, once again, feel free to make your own thread discussing this. Thank you.
no, my response is just the result of what will happen if your ideas are made reality. nothing will change.
the fact that you just ignored why your system was bad and told me to post elsewhere confirms this is a very elaborate troll thread. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." |

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:28:00 -
[49] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:Can I ask you a serious question...
Do you think CCP is going to enact changes that will detrimentally affect a large portion of their player base?
We discussed this in my thread of how the forums caused CCP to change the game when it comes to mining barges being buffed because of the threads complaing about ganking.
Can you imagine the threadnaughts that will ensue if your changes were enacted? I'm not sure what is going to happen. This is why the post was made. I think changes need to be made so I created a post about it. It's the first step. One small post for PRCs; one giant leap for a better gameplay experience. Gotta start somewhere. Thank you. Well you have to keep in mind if people are in NPC corps and using that system a great deal that they must really enjoy the benefits of said system. When you propose major changes to said system, you must realize that people are not going to like said changes and there will have some major resistance to such a suggestion. If you had taken some time to consider "Will the majority of EvE player accept this change?" then you have to come to conlusion at least the people in the NPC corps would not accept this change, then you have to consider how much of the player base will reject your ideas. And you can't get to that point simply by posting a forum post. You get some idea, but people don't come out of the woodwork until something really bothers them.
The popular vote wasn't my concern. I already know all the things you stated. But, that doesn't mean the opinion shouldn't be posted or discussed.
I realize some of the ideas aren't going to be liked. And I am willing to also realize that they might not be implemented. It's okay to post an adverse idea. This way we know what the players want.
Thank you.
|

Mars Theran
Red Rogue Squadron
1620
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:28:00 -
[50] - Quote
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote:Beekeeper Bob wrote:
Why is it, people insist on thinking they are the only ones with an opinion?
Because the internet creates a strange contradiction of bringing people together yet encouraging solipsism.
So does the rest of the world mate.  zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub |

Dave Stark
1811
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:30:00 -
[51] - Quote
Sol Weinstein wrote:Whitehound wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:I disagree that my suggestions add nothing to the game. True. They add a lot of limitations to it. Heartless, selfish, mean and unnecessary limitations, which is far worse than nothing. That is a wonderful opinion. And I feel that some of the things NPC corp players are allowed to do also add hearless, selfish, mean, and unnecessary limitation to the playstyle of others. This is why the thread was created. Your negative opinion is noted. Thank you for your time and input.
oh my sides, this is too funny. especially since npc corp players already have less tools at their disposal. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." |

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:32:00 -
[52] - Quote
Dave Stark
I disagree that my suggestions add nothing to the game. It would add a protection to PRCs from people who abuse the NPC Corporation Exploit.
I won't even suggest that you yourself are abusing the system. Because, that would be a personal attack on you. I will have faith that you have never once used your protection inside an NPC corp to place a 100k bounty on someone with no risk to yourself or your main characters. Just like you don't use the same character in the NPC corp to protect your main character from getting any backlash inside the game.
My tongue is firmly planted in my cheek as I say those last two sentences.
Your sig:
"100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system."
Thank you.[/quote wrote:
this *is* my main character. i don't use an NPC corp alt to post/do my dirty work. i use an NPC corp character as my main character because the simple fact is; player corps have nothing to offer me.
i fail to see how using an npc corp character to shield a player from backlash is any different to using an alt in a player corp that they never log in, just create a character on an account, put it in a random player corp and send it isk to create bounties. not letting npc corp player use the bounty feature doesn't stop people being able to be "immune to backlash" it just means they have to click 2 more buttons to place a bounty.
it would be quicker, easier, and less hassle to just remove NPC corps if you truly have an issue with them. because your list of "demands" really are ill thought out and terrible. there's no getting around that.
This post wasn't about multiple characters on the same account created to avoid the system. This post is about people (maybe not you specifically) using the 'protection' of an NPC corp to act like a player in a PRC. Your response is talking about something totally different. Feel free to make your own thread regarding multiple characters on the same account (or other accounts) created with the intent to abuse the system.
A second character (on the same account or other account) should be used to play in a different style than the others. Or it can be used to play the game the exact same way but with a different identity. A second account should not be used to abuse the systems of the game. But, once again, feel free to make your own thread discussing this.
Thank you. [/quote]
no, my response is just the result of what will happen if your ideas are made reality. nothing will change.
the fact that you just ignored why your system was bad and told me to post elsewhere confirms this is a very elaborate troll thread.[/quote]
I would ask that you keep your personally attacking opinions about me or my post to yourself. They are not allowed on these forums, nor are they welcome by me. This is not a troll thread ("troll" in the way you are using it).
I didn't ignore why my system was bad. That is the entire point of the thread. To see who thinks it is bad, who thinks it is good, and also who thinks it had some good ideas and others bad. Your continued insistence of telling me you disagree with them is not only pointless, but also starting to border on your own word: "trolling".
Your negative response to my opinion has been noted and I thank you for it. If you have nothing else to say about my post, please do yourself a favor and move on.
Thank you.
|

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
2135
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:32:00 -
[53] - Quote
Sol Weinstein wrote: NPC Corporation Exploit.
Unless you are privy to information that the rest of us are not, I suggest you stop with the FUD.
An exploit is what CCP says an exploit is. Using an exploit is a bannable offense. I haven't seen anything lately about being banned for belonging to an NPC corp, so as far as I can tell, there is no exploit.
Mr Epeen  -ávOv |

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:34:00 -
[54] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:Whitehound wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:I disagree that my suggestions add nothing to the game. True. They add a lot of limitations to it. Heartless, selfish, mean and unnecessary limitations, which is far worse than nothing. That is a wonderful opinion. And I feel that some of the things NPC corp players are allowed to do also add hearless, selfish, mean, and unnecessary limitation to the playstyle of others. This is why the thread was created. Your negative opinion is noted. Thank you for your time and input. especially since npc corp players already have less tools at their disposal.
Please feel free to list the missing tools at their disposal.
(Also, they SHOULD have less tools at their disposal. At least in my opinion. Opinion... the point of this thread.)
Thank you.
|

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air The Unthinkables
2824
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:34:00 -
[55] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote: Well you have to keep in mind if people are in NPC corps and using that system a great deal that they must really enjoy the benefits of said system.
Botters really enjoy the benefits of botting. What's your point? |

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:36:00 -
[56] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote: NPC Corporation Exploit.
Unless you are privy to information that the rest of us are not, I suggest you stop with the FUD. An exploit is what CCP says an exploit is. Using an exploit is a bannable offense. I haven't seen anything lately about being banned for belonging to an NPC corp, so as far as I can tell, there is no exploit. Mr Epeen 
I wasn't aware that I had to start every post or sentence with "in my opinion". But I can change it for you if you need the clarification.
In my opinion, it is an abuse of the system. Otherwise known as: an exploit.
But again, my opinion. I see you disagree with me and that is okay.
Thank you.
|

Whitehound
617
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:39:00 -
[57] - Quote
Sol Weinstein wrote:Whitehound wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:I disagree that my suggestions add nothing to the game. True. They add a lot of limitations to it. Heartless, selfish, mean and unnecessary limitations, which is far worse than nothing. That is a wonderful opinion. And I feel that some of the things NPC corp players are allowed to do also add hearless, selfish, mean, and unnecessary limitation to the playstyle of others. This is why the thread was created. Your negative opinion is noted. Thank you for your time and input. And as they say, two wrongs don't make a right.
I suppose you'll put this down as yet another negative opinion. SCAM CAT - Titan Jump - I was there - Goon Dog |

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:42:00 -
[58] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:Whitehound wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:I disagree that my suggestions add nothing to the game. True. They add a lot of limitations to it. Heartless, selfish, mean and unnecessary limitations, which is far worse than nothing. That is a wonderful opinion. And I feel that some of the things NPC corp players are allowed to do also add hearless, selfish, mean, and unnecessary limitation to the playstyle of others. This is why the thread was created. Your negative opinion is noted. Thank you for your time and input. And as they say, two wrongs don't make a right. I suppose you'll put this down as yet another negative opinion.
Perhaps.
Mainly because I don't believe my, or any opinion, is "wrong".
So, anything else on what my post was about? Do you disagree with everything? Do you feel that the system is working 100% fine and you can see NO OPPORTUNITY to add positive change to the current system?
Thank you.
|

Aren Madigan
EVE University Ivy League
27
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:45:00 -
[59] - Quote
All I'm getting out of this is you don't like how other players play and are stamping your feet to get it change, despite the fact that it'd make things so restrictive to new players that it would destroy CCP's current stated goal of attracting new blood... so how is this a good idea? |

Whitehound
618
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:51:00 -
[60] - Quote
Sol Weinstein wrote:So, anything else on what my post was about? Do you disagree with everything? Do you feel that the system is working 100% fine and you can see NO OPPORTUNITY to add positive change to the current system?
Thank you. Quite honestly, and not meant as an offence, does your list come across as fascist. There are plenty of benefits for not being in an NPC corporation and anyone who does not respond to the positive reinforcement will likely not respond positively to your belt whipping, but quit.
If EVE drives you into believing such radical limitations are necessary then you might want to take a break from the game for a while. Again, no offence intended, but with your best interest in mind. SCAM CAT - Titan Jump - I was there - Goon Dog |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |