Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Kiran
Knights of Azrael
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:45:00 -
[91] - Quote
The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.
1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.
2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)
3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.
If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox. |

Sarrgon
Avalonians United
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:50:00 -
[92] - Quote
Well like ratting, bigger the ship higher the bounties, smaller the ship smaller the bounties and small like in ratting so it wouldn't nearly cover the cost of the ship to avoid abuse. |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 22:08:00 -
[93] - Quote
Kiran wrote:The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.
1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.
2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)
3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.
If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox.
Exactly THIS....will happen and then CCP can slowly go over to kiss Eve good bye and if the trolls on the Forums doesn't will believe it remove Hisec ice and Eve REALLY will die horrible and slow dead. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
257
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 22:21:00 -
[94] - Quote
Kiran wrote:The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.
1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.
2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)
3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.
If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox. As much as I "carebear" these days and run POS's etc. this is not quite true.
The only thing a high-sec POS effectively allows is for you to work on BPO's/BPC's and copies. ALL of which can be done in stations - albeit, waiting 3 months for a slot. This can be easily remedied at the flick of a switch by CCP.
All production on any item that can be done in a highsec POS can also be done in station.
It will mean a rationalization of highsec POS's at worst but will it force 0.0 alliances to mine their own ice and this alone makes them very, very vulnerable. This can only be a good thing. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Terminal Entry
New Fnord Industries
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 02:36:00 -
[95] - Quote
Akara Ito wrote:Terminal Entry wrote:Just remove all Ice from the game and have POSes powered from a reactor, just like the capacitor is in ships.
The less 'Logistics-Online' the better.
Guess what the reactors would be fuelled with ? 
Exactly the same thing as ship reactors are of course! 
You seem to be wedded to the idea that POSes need to be fueled and that there isn't another way to balance them.
|

Kiran
Knights of Azrael
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 10:33:00 -
[96] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Kiran wrote:The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.
1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.
2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)
3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.
If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox. As much as I "carebear" these days and run POS's etc. this is not quite true. The only thing a high-sec POS effectively allows is for you to work on BPO's/BPC's and copies. ALL of which can be done in stations - albeit, waiting 3 months for a slot. This can be easily remedied at the flick of a switch by CCP. All production on any item that can be done in a highsec POS can also be done in station. It will mean a rationalization of highsec POS's at worst but will it force 0.0 alliances to mine their own ice and this alone makes them very, very vulnerable. This can only be a good thing.
Before POS's was released we had the same amount of industry slots in stations as we do today and with even less people playing you still had to wait 3 months for a slot. I can not see CCP giving high sec stations more industry slots.
I remeber I had to move to a 0.4 system to get any industry slots and this was in the time when 0.4 was still under concord protection. But with high sec now smaller than it use to be factory slots in empire are a lot less.
|

loser mclame fatty
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 11:02:00 -
[97] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: You Sir seems not gotten the point i wanted to bring up aside from the large impact Hiseciceremoving will have not only on infrastructure, market and economy it also will FORCE....i repeat me agein FORCE technically players to leave hisec to go to either lowsec or 0.0 to get what they need.....please understand there are peoples DOESN'T want to go there at all....they simply decided to stay in hisec cause of beeing saved before the stress low and 0.0 sec activity can cause....stress which if it really gets bad and hard kills every relaxing amount this game can and had for them.
Remember, some peoples are coming home from a stressfull day at work and loggin in to eve to have a bit relaxing activities here and enjoying their stay with some friends they have here as well....if this goes away....those players will go away ( leave ) as well and that Sir....is a promise which will happen if CCP is not finally ligthens up and starts to think a bit themselfes again.
holy **** do you also live in nigeria and have a large quantity of money you need me to help you move in exchange for a 20% cut but first you need a $5,000 tracking fee |

Alain Kinsella
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 11:03:00 -
[98] - Quote
The suggestion I had made in the old thread was to remote Ice completely (as a mining mechanic) and redo as P2 planet products (for the core products anyway - Stront would be made in the same reaction chambers that you do boosters in, giving a boost to Low). The Mackinaw would become a gas miner, though it would require some tank adjustment.
I still think this would be a reasonable idea, and would not take much dev work; Everything is there already, just extend to replace. |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 11:29:00 -
[99] - Quote
loser mclame fatty wrote:Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: You Sir seems not gotten the point i wanted to bring up aside from the large impact Hiseciceremoving will have not only on infrastructure, market and economy it also will FORCE....i repeat me agein FORCE technically players to leave hisec to go to either lowsec or 0.0 to get what they need.....please understand there are peoples DOESN'T want to go there at all....they simply decided to stay in hisec cause of beeing saved before the stress low and 0.0 sec activity can cause....stress which if it really gets bad and hard kills every relaxing amount this game can and had for them.
Remember, some peoples are coming home from a stressfull day at work and loggin in to eve to have a bit relaxing activities here and enjoying their stay with some friends they have here as well....if this goes away....those players will go away ( leave ) as well and that Sir....is a promise which will happen if CCP is not finally ligthens up and starts to think a bit themselfes again.
holy **** do you also live in nigeria and have a large quantity of money you need me to help you move in exchange for a 20% cut but first you need a $5,000 tracking fee
STFU and learn to read!! |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
101
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 11:30:00 -
[100] - Quote
Basicly the whole idea of moving people into low sec is flawed with the current alliance pvp only mentallity and politics
At the moment ,how i see it is is actually easier and cheaper for nullsec alliance just to mine the abc ores and exploit moons for moo goo , take what they need for their own use and sell the rest in high sec and buy their low end minerals and ice products there and still end up with a huge profit, which makes sense
It is not that there aren't any opportunities for a ondustrial in nullsec, just the mentallity isn't there to expand a alliance industrial base and to become selfsufficient What hardcore pvp pilot would want to babysit over a bunch of iceminers while he could do plexes and earn a few 100 millions Second most ex nullsec dwellers eventually left nullsec because they despise the politics and the drama or got sick and tired being treated as second rat e citizen or ending up as target practice by a alliance that is actually blue to the sov holding alliance they belong or rent from
Alot of people who are into industry or mining i know in high sec really want to have a go in nullsec but sadly like i said before the mentallity and current sov mechanics making this very hard of not impossible
And removing high sec ice will certainly not get more people into null sec
just my thoughts I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 11:35:00 -
[101] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:Basicly the whole idea of moving people into low sec is flawed with the current alliance pvp only mentallity and politics
At the moment ,how i see it is is actually easier and cheaper for nullsec alliance just to mine the abc ores and exploit moons for moo goo , take what they need for their own use and sell the rest in high sec and buy their low end minerals and ice products there and still end up with a huge profit, which makes sense
It is not that there aren't any opportunities for a ondustrial in nullsec, just the mentallity isn't there to expand a alliance industrial base and to become selfsufficient What hardcore pvp pilot would want to babysit over a bunch of iceminers while he could do plexes and earn a few 100 millions Second most ex nullsec dwellers eventually left nullsec because they despise the politics and the drama or got sick and tired being treated as second rat e citizen or ending up as target practice by a alliance that is actually blue to the sov holding alliance they belong or rent from
Alot of people who are into industry or mining i know in high sec really want to have a go in nullsec but sadly like i said before the mentallity and current sov mechanics making this very hard of not impossible
And removing high sec ice will certainly not get more people into null sec
just my thoughts
Pretty much this i agree to....and technically all pro's and con's allready have been said....so i think it's about time CCP makes realy a final statement about the whole topic in regards to removing ice completely from hisec.
Come on CCP....lets hear your voice its about time NOW!! |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
556
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:25:00 -
[102] - Quote
Currently, hi-sec ice is generating a whole lot of gameplay and tears. As far as I'm concerned, it should stay. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Smiley Smile
Invisible Speculum
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:28:00 -
[103] - Quote
In a weird way, the Goon campaign is proving that moving ice into null and allowing it to be controlled (like moons) causes prices to skyrocket and access to drop. Why Goons are choosing to make that point is something I don't know, as I'm unsure whether the leadership does or does not want ice to disappear.
It was flagged in the initial announcement (on the gank campaign) as the weakest link in the economy. Proving how fragile it is might bolster the argument to make ice commodities more stable and available - ie, keep it in highsec and maybe expand th number of systems.
I only worry about wormholes if ice were to move to null and be more easily manipulated, as the POS is the core of WH life.
As a WH roamer, though, I like the idea of finding more and more POS that have run out of fuel ;)
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
556
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:31:00 -
[104] - Quote
Smiley Smile wrote:In a weird way, the Goon campaign is proving that moving ice into null and allowing it to be controlled (like moons) causes prices to skyrocket and access to drop.
It's way too early in the campaign to properly make this argument. We're barely out of the initial price shock.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
102
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:39:00 -
[105] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Smiley Smile wrote:In a weird way, the Goon campaign is proving that moving ice into null and allowing it to be controlled (like moons) causes prices to skyrocket and access to drop. It's way too early in the campaign to properly make this argument. We're barely out of the initial price shock.
Actually just the idea or rumour will send prices shyhigh in RL trading and it does the same in EVE I might despise the goons for all their rethoric and sometimes plain childish behavoir , sometimes they do hit the right note
Tho this could be accidently I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
596
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:40:00 -
[106] - Quote
Smiley Smile wrote:In a weird way, the Goon campaign is proving that moving ice into null and allowing it to be controlled (like moons) causes prices to skyrocket and access to drop. Why Goons are choosing to make that point is something I don't know, as I'm unsure whether the leadership does or does not want ice to disappear.
It was flagged in the initial announcement (on the gank campaign) as the weakest link in the economy. Proving how fragile it is might bolster the argument to make ice commodities more stable and available - ie, keep it in highsec and maybe expand th number of systems.
I only worry about wormholes if ice were to move to null and be more easily manipulated, as the POS is the core of WH life.
As a WH roamer, though, I like the idea of finding more and more POS that have run out of fuel ;)
everyone, including every ccp employee considering it, knows moving ice to 0.0 would cause prices to increase and access to drop, that would be the point |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
596
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:41:00 -
[107] - Quote
really the only argument our campaign makes to ccp is "woo we can have fun with these highsec ice belts" |

Woo Glin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:43:00 -
[108] - Quote
Removing ice from hisec won't do anything to move people into 0.0. The ice miners will just mine veldspar or scordite or whatever else they can find, as many have been doing in Gallente space as of late. The fact that they'll make less is a moot point as they're already mining (in hisec) and making pennies to begin with.
It's easy to get into a 0.0 alliance, even one with sov, in nearly any region of space with few exceptions. The reality is that the vast majority of the player-base has absolutely no interest in PvP in any form, be it consensual or non-consensual, and would rather run the isk-treadmill in the warm bosom of concord.
Don't hold your breath for any nerfs to hisec incomes. Those players are by far the least demanding portion of their subscription base. EVE is being relegated to the back burner and the hisec population is the key to EVE's long-term profitability. |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
102
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:49:00 -
[109] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Smiley Smile wrote:In a weird way, the Goon campaign is proving that moving ice into null and allowing it to be controlled (like moons) causes prices to skyrocket and access to drop. Why Goons are choosing to make that point is something I don't know, as I'm unsure whether the leadership does or does not want ice to disappear.
It was flagged in the initial announcement (on the gank campaign) as the weakest link in the economy. Proving how fragile it is might bolster the argument to make ice commodities more stable and available - ie, keep it in highsec and maybe expand th number of systems.
I only worry about wormholes if ice were to move to null and be more easily manipulated, as the POS is the core of WH life.
As a WH roamer, though, I like the idea of finding more and more POS that have run out of fuel ;)
everyone, including every ccp employee considering it, knows moving ice to 0.0 would cause prices to increase and access to drop, that would be the point
indeed and in the worse case scenario forces most of the players to stop playing eve since you, in the worse case scenario, killed off the playerdriven economy, which is one of the 2 basic foundations this whole sandbox rest on other one being the non conse whatever ...pvp, what would you fight for if nobody buys your abc ores or moongoo anymore
This is in the worse case scenario tho
Goons Delenda Est
I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Woo Glin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:49:00 -
[110] - Quote
See also: The chinese server, where the playerbase is small enough that major parts of the economy don't function properly due to a lack of players to run the complex extraction/refining/manufacturing chains necessary for sustained production. If anything, I would expect any potential re-balancing of moons to make better use of both low-ends and alchemy. PI followed this same path. Don't look for low-value/high-volume items like ice to leave hisec anytime soon. |

Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
70
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:50:00 -
[111] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Currently, hi-sec ice is generating a whole lot of gameplay and tears. As far as I'm concerned, it should stay.
Now that's the spirit. Gameplay, tears and profit. Any Ferengi would be proud.  Your campaign has certainly generated a good amount of very interesting dynamics. The door is not real. |

Simetraz
State War Academy Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:59:00 -
[112] - Quote
You know make one fuel for high-sec POS's. One for WH Pos's. And get rid of high-sec ice and let 0.0 figure it out how they are going to fuel all their POS's.
Problem solved.
Carriers of old (Fighters vs Bombers and Fighter Screens) |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |