| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

KingMazz ONE
Helhest 1st Prospectors' Collective
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 20:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
is it true that ice will be removed from hi sec ? and moved to null and low sec . |

Jooce McNasty
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
20
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
If its not do you really want to keep mining it in highsec while the Goons are on their current campaign? I support them in what they are doing but I do not know how long this will last and how wide spread it will get.
It would be cool to see them keep this campaign going for a year or more, especially if they are willing on spending the isk to keep the hulks dying. |
|

CCP Zymurgist
C C P C C P Alliance
189

|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
In CCP Greyscale's blog he discussed moving Ice to null sec as part of the 0.0 Industry revamp. It hasn't been decided yet if this will happen or not. I suggest checking out the archived Features and Ideas forum for some more info on what was discussed. Zymurgist Community Representative CCP NA, EVE Online Contact Us at http://support.eveonline.com/pages/petitions/createpetition.aspx |
|

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jooce McNasty wrote:If its not do you really want to keep mining it in highsec while the Goons are on their current campaign? I support them in what they are doing but I do not know how long this will last and how wide spread it will get.
It would be cool to see them keep this campaign going for a year or more, especially if they are willing on spending the isk to keep the hulks dying.
You really have no clue what you're talking about HUH?......If they remove all curenntly in hisec located ice into lowsec and 0.0 you can expect the market break through the roof and then collapse in a big bang followed by hundreds of hisec players leaving the game if not thousands of them.....if ice can't get mined anymore in hisec and keep the price in a somwhat tolerable and affordable range most the hisec POSes in hisec and also lowsec will get removed and construction research and much other stuff will come to a nearly complete halt.
Simply due to the fact Hisec research facilitys will get swamped and blocked more for months from a few keeping their jobs within the queue while the rest can suffer their soon forseeable financial dead.
If you really want this happen...or talking about the remove without having a idea what the consequences will be of this totally unneeded move you better should stay quite and go in a corner and get ashamed by your incompetence. |

Rhinanna
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
Anyone leaving because the price of ANY one commodity gets changed, is simply ********.
Oh noes, so it costs twice as much to run a POS or jump capital ships.... seriously.....
Either its an alt industry char and you have other options to make ISK or you are a heavy industry guy and have other options to make ISK.
|

mkint
135
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Well, removing ice from highsec would mean more income for the RMTers that control 0.0, the CSM, and possibly certain devs, so yeah, sooner or later it probably will be. However, one of the devs said that they were taking it off the table for now. It'll probably stay off the table until RMT income starts suffering. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
The essence of the ice removal hypothesis is that in order to make null more attractive to the masses, CCP is willing to scorch the rest of New Eden with game breaking improvements in favor of null. This is otherwise known commonly as "the poor getting poorer and the rich getting richer" or "stealing from Peter to pay Paul". The logic of it all eludes me. It is only when I ponder whether CCP is benefiting financially from null RMT operations does it make sense. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Baralosus
Crimson Empire.
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:34:00 -
[8] - Quote
Why not reduce the number of ice belts in hi sec systems and slightly increase number of ice belts in null sec? At least there will still be hi sec ice to be mined, only it'll be more scarce. Would be a better alternative to getting rid of ice in hi sec completely. Prices will go up but not nearly as much as the alternative. |

Jooce McNasty
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
20
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:Jooce McNasty wrote:If its not do you really want to keep mining it in highsec while the Goons are on their current campaign? I support them in what they are doing but I do not know how long this will last and how wide spread it will get.
It would be cool to see them keep this campaign going for a year or more, especially if they are willing on spending the isk to keep the hulks dying. You really have no clue what you're talking about HUH?......If they remove all curenntly in hisec located ice into lowsec and 0.0 you can expect the market break through the roof and then collapse in a big bang followed by hundreds of hisec players leaving the game if not thousands of them.....if ice can't get mined anymore in hisec and keep the price in a somwhat tolerable and affordable range most the hisec POSes in hisec and also lowsec will get removed and construction research and much other stuff will come to a nearly complete halt. Simply due to the fact Hisec research facilitys will get swamped and blocked more for months from a few keeping their jobs within the queue while the rest can suffer their soon forseeable financial dead. If you really want this happen...or talking about the remove without having a idea what the consequences will be of this totally unneeded move you better should stay quite and go in a corner and get ashamed by your incompetence.
I realize this will happen, EVE needs a big shake up this coupled with the super nerf up-comming might keep things interesting for awhile, and yes I do use I products on some of my chars. |

Zendoren
Aktaeon Industries The Black Armada
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:54:00 -
[10] - Quote
My vote is to take away Belt Ice in high and low sec and move it to probeable grav sites. However for this to be a success, ice needs to be worth mining and as it stands right now (Goon ganking aside) Ice is not worth mining.
TL;DR 1) ice as Grav sites in empire space. 2) Reduce Iso requirements for POS and increase requirements for capital ships (adjust Iso's m3 also) 3) make ice depletable. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
540
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
mkint wrote:Well, removing ice from highsec would mean more income for the RMTers that control 0.0, the CSM, and possibly certain devs, so yeah, sooner or later it probably will be. However, one of the devs said that they were taking it off the table for now. It'll probably stay off the table until RMT income starts suffering.
ahahahahahahahahaha
look at the loon |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
460
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
mkint wrote:Well, removing ice from highsec would mean more income for the RMTers that control 0.0, the CSM, and possibly certain devs, so yeah, sooner or later it probably will be. However, one of the devs said that they were taking it off the table for now. It'll probably stay off the table until RMT income starts suffering. Goons are literally running your life.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
113
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:03:00 -
[13] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:Jooce McNasty wrote:If its not do you really want to keep mining it in highsec while the Goons are on their current campaign? I support them in what they are doing but I do not know how long this will last and how wide spread it will get.
It would be cool to see them keep this campaign going for a year or more, especially if they are willing on spending the isk to keep the hulks dying. You really have no clue what you're talking about HUH?......If they remove all curenntly in hisec located ice into lowsec and 0.0 you can expect the market break through the roof and then collapse in a big bang followed by hundreds of hisec players leaving the game if not thousands of them.....if ice can't get mined anymore in hisec and keep the price in a somwhat tolerable and affordable range most the hisec POSes in hisec and also lowsec will get removed and construction research and much other stuff will come to a nearly complete halt. Simply due to the fact Hisec research facilitys will get swamped and blocked more for months from a few keeping their jobs within the queue while the rest can suffer their soon forseeable financial dead. If you really want this happen...or talking about the remove without having a idea what the consequences will be of this totally unneeded move you better should stay quite and go in a corner and get ashamed by your incompetence.
Go mine ice in low-sec or null.
Problem solved. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Psychophantic
74
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:06:00 -
[14] - Quote
Same CSM who declares war on hi-sec ice was involved in brain-storming session about its eventual removal.
Didn't happen soon enough? |

mkint
135
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:12:00 -
[15] - Quote
lol, look at goons attacking my suggestion that there are RMTers on the CSM. Guilty much? |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:12:00 -
[16] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:Jooce McNasty wrote:If its not do you really want to keep mining it in highsec while the Goons are on their current campaign? I support them in what they are doing but I do not know how long this will last and how wide spread it will get.
It would be cool to see them keep this campaign going for a year or more, especially if they are willing on spending the isk to keep the hulks dying. You really have no clue what you're talking about HUH?......If they remove all curenntly in hisec located ice into lowsec and 0.0 you can expect the market break through the roof and then collapse in a big bang followed by hundreds of hisec players leaving the game if not thousands of them.....if ice can't get mined anymore in hisec and keep the price in a somwhat tolerable and affordable range most the hisec POSes in hisec and also lowsec will get removed and construction research and much other stuff will come to a nearly complete halt. Simply due to the fact Hisec research facilitys will get swamped and blocked more for months from a few keeping their jobs within the queue while the rest can suffer their soon forseeable financial dead. If you really want this happen...or talking about the remove without having a idea what the consequences will be of this totally unneeded move you better should stay quite and go in a corner and get ashamed by your incompetence. Go mine ice in low-sec or null. Problem solved.
And get blown up by every moment i try it? No thanks......if the remove happens and peoples will get forced to lowsec or 0.0 you can watch my bum leaving outta the door unsubbing my account with others along and saying good bye to the F**ed up game that Eve has gotten lately brougth to the state by the Glourious and selfish CSM and CCP which is seemingly listen to them without remorse and fullfilling their wishes.
We'll see if CCP is really that stupid and kills his own game hisselfs or uses the few left braincells and stops the bullshit which is laying on the table in form from plans written up by the allready richest Allys in Eve just to f**k up the average player even more. |

Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation RONA Directorate
174
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:13:00 -
[17] - Quote
As i recall since goons started destroying anyone mining blue ice, the price has nearly quadrupled in places. This has made it so that a instead of 4 million / day to run a large pos tower of gallente style, it is nearly 12 million per day.
So yeah I really doubt high sec ice will be removed.
Also, dont fix what ain't broken. High sec ice is fine if anything adjust the refine amounts - like i kept saying in the features and ideas thread.
high sec ice - 250 isotopes per refine low sec ice - 325 isotopes 0.0 ice - 400 isotopes per refine.
Thats balance and will encourage low sec and 0.0 mining. |

Daedalus II
Helios Research Combat Mining and Logistics
51
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:13:00 -
[18] - Quote
I am one carebear that would like to see this happen. Maybe it will be worth it to take a fleet out into lowsec and mine some ice under heavy protection. That sure as hell would be a lot more fun than sitting in high sec with bleeding eyes watching your cargo hold slowly fill with ice. |

mechtech
SRS Industries SRS.
34
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:19:00 -
[19] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: And get blown up by every moment i try it? No thanks......if the remove happens and peoples will get forced to lowsec or 0.0 you can watch my bum leaving outta the door unsubbing my account with others along and saying good bye to the F**ed up game that Eve has gotten lately brougth to the state by the Glourious and selfish CSM and CCP which is seemingly listen to them without remorse and fullfilling their wishes.
We'll see if CCP is really that stupid and kills his own game hisselfs or uses the few left braincells and stops the bullshit which is laying on the table in form from plans written up by the allready richest Allys in Eve just to f**k up the average player even more.
Oh please, in 7 years of playing this game it's never been easier for the high sec player than it is now. From a game design standpoint CCP can see that high sec is too easy, and 0.0 doesn't really pay off for the extra risk and work involved.
A true eve player welcomes change, embraces the new dynamics brought to the table, and profits from the new opportunities. Geez, what game are you playing?!
Don't whine, don't be a sheep, Adapt or Die.
Daedalus II wrote:I am one carebear that would like to see this happen. Maybe it will be worth it to take a fleet out into lowsec and mine some ice under heavy protection. That sure as hell would be a lot more fun than sitting in high sec with bleeding eyes watching your cargo hold slowly fill with ice.
Exactly. |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:26:00 -
[20] - Quote
mechtech wrote:Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: And get blown up by every moment i try it? No thanks......if the remove happens and peoples will get forced to lowsec or 0.0 you can watch my bum leaving outta the door unsubbing my account with others along and saying good bye to the F**ed up game that Eve has gotten lately brougth to the state by the Glourious and selfish CSM and CCP which is seemingly listen to them without remorse and fullfilling their wishes.
We'll see if CCP is really that stupid and kills his own game hisselfs or uses the few left braincells and stops the bullshit which is laying on the table in form from plans written up by the allready richest Allys in Eve just to f**k up the average player even more.
Oh please, in 7 years of playing this game it's never been easier for the high sec player than it is now. From a game design standpoint CCP can see that high sec is too easy, and 0.0 doesn't really pay off for the extra risk and work involved. A true eve player welcomes change, embraces the new dynamics brought to the table, and profits from the new opportunities. Geez, what game are you playing?! Don't whine, don't be a sheep, Adapt or Die. Daedalus II wrote:I am one carebear that would like to see this happen. Maybe it will be worth it to take a fleet out into lowsec and mine some ice under heavy protection. That sure as hell would be a lot more fun than sitting in high sec with bleeding eyes watching your cargo hold slowly fill with ice. Exactly.
You Sir seems not gotten the point i wanted to bring up aside from the large impact Hiseciceremoving will have not only on infrastructure, market and economy it also will FORCE....i repeat me agein FORCE technically players to leave hisec to go to either lowsec or 0.0 to get what they need.....please understand there are peoples DOESN'T want to go there at all....they simply decided to stay in hisec cause of beeing saved before the stress low and 0.0 sec activity can cause....stress which if it really gets bad and hard kills every relaxing amount this game can and had for them.
Remember, some peoples are coming home from a stressfull day at work and loggin in to eve to have a bit relaxing activities here and enjoying their stay with some friends they have here as well....if this goes away....those players will go away ( leave ) as well and that Sir....is a promise which will happen if CCP is not finally ligthens up and starts to think a bit themselfes again. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
540
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:29:00 -
[21] - Quote
mkint wrote:lol, look at goons attacking my suggestion that there are RMTers on the CSM. Guilty much? attacking is sort of the wrong word I think mocking you and hysterically laughing at you is a more accurate phrase |

Rhinanna
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:29:00 -
[22] - Quote
Ok, I can make 45mil/hour (average) in hi-sec running missions easily.
I can MAX out at 60mil/hour, in a good system, with a lot more RISK and hassle (moving ships/ammo down e.t.c.)
This is all using the same ship, I could easily use a lot more powerful/expensive ship in empire with very little risk, particularly in a 0.8 or above (no change to bounties or loot which is most of the income) with practically ZERO danger.
In null, having to deal with AFK-cloakers, roaming gangs, solo-hunters e.t.c. involves risk and even if you play PERFECTLY 100% OF THE TIME and never get caught, it still costs you a lot of time, which is income gone.
All in all, high-sec currently has almost all the advantages for players, Null only has advantages for alliances, it should have both or there is no reward for the risk for the players. The advantages for alliances are however been reduced as I believe moon-goo is getting nerfed. |

Name Family Name
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
35
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:30:00 -
[23] - Quote
The interesting bit is the fact that e.g. white glace is rising damn fast, whereas goons only interdict gallente ice mining atm (may have missed some events, as I'm not really actively playing atm).
Pure speculation? Dev info leaked? Who knows... |

Daedalus II
Helios Research Combat Mining and Logistics
52
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:31:00 -
[24] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: You Sir seems not gotten the point i wanted to bring up aside from the large impact Hiseciceremoving will have not only on infrastructure, market and economy it also will FORCE....i repeat me agein FORCE technically players to leave hisec to go to either lowsec or 0.0 to get what they need.....please understand there are peoples DOESN'T want to go there at all....they simply decided to stay in hisec cause of beeing saved before the stress low and 0.0 sec activity can cause....stress which if it really gets bad and hard kills every relaxing amount this game can and had for them.
Remember, some peoples are coming home from a stressfull day at work and loggin in to eve to have a bit relaxing activities here and enjoying their stay with some friends they have here as well....if this goes away....those players will go away ( leave ) as well and that Sir....is a promise which will happen if CCP is not finally ligthens up and starts to think a bit themselfes again.
No one is forced to do anything. If you were mining ice for profit in high sec, you can just as well start mining ore instead, it gives roughly the same income and experience. If you were mining ice for your POS because you're too cheap to buy it then you will just have to buy it instead if you absolutely don't want to go to low sec. Buying fuel is ever so easy and safe. I would assume that if you run lvl 4 missions roughly as long as it would take you to mine the ice, you get enough money to buy it instead.
Two easy solutions; just use some imagination. |

Jooce McNasty
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
20
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:34:00 -
[25] - Quote
Name Family Name wrote:The interesting bit is the fact that e.g. white glace is rising damn fast, whereas goons only interdict gallente ice mining atm (may have missed some events, as I'm not really actively playing atm).
Pure speculation? Dev info leaked? Who knows...
They have expanded their reach, it is now just not in Gallente space that they are paying out bounty's, you can get them in Caldari space now and soon Minimatari space. Could be just a matter of time before all of hisec miners are under attack. |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
368
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:35:00 -
[26] - Quote
mechtech wrote: Oh please, in 7 years of playing this game it's never been easier for the high sec player than it is now. From a game design standpoint CCP can see that high sec is too easy, and 0.0 doesn't really pay off for the extra risk and work involved.
That's kind of a funny thing to say. The extra risk is in staying in empire.
I'm much more comfy going for a dump when I'm on one of my 0.0 characters than on any I might have in high sec. It's null that's never been safer. Or easier for that matter. Bots to do all the grunt work and next to no wars. Just sit around a bubbled gate and chitchat while drinking cheap hooch and pretending you are playing a game.
Keep the ice in high sec for the few people that enjoy mining and the people that enjoy killing them.
Mr Epeen 
If you can read this, you haven't blocked me yet. |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:42:00 -
[27] - Quote
Daedalus II wrote:Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: .
No one is forced to do anything. If you were mining ice for profit in high sec, you can just as well start mining ore instead, it gives roughly the same income and experience. If you were mining ice for your POS because you're too cheap to buy it then you will just have to buy it instead if you absolutely don't want to go to low sec. Buying fuel is ever so easy and safe. I would assume that if you run lvl 4 missions roughly as long as it would take you to mine the ice, you get enough money to buy it instead. Two easy solutions; just use some imagination.
Whatever....what i'm also trying to imply is....if hisec POSses getting closed cause of beeing anylonger profitable due to the iceproducts prices rising to the stars....production will also get a huge impact so will research and more stuff going down within hisec, not speaking about t2 production which will after a while be fully in the hands from the 0.0 allys so they can whenevery they want totally manipulate the t2 market.
or as mentioned before by a former post from me come up with the threat to the still present hisecpopulation as following:
Hisec ally: 'if you want to have t2 products to your pleasure with an modest price you will have to leave hisec and join us so you get the supply's you're looking for....from now on we're totally blocking t2 product delivery to hisec so you are all F****ed!! Mhuahuahuahua!!!'
this is just a vision what 'Can happen' but Must not happen.
Again we'll see what will come but i'm very dissapointed about CCP even thinking about the step at all. |

Name Family Name
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
35
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:46:00 -
[28] - Quote
Jooce McNasty wrote:Name Family Name wrote:The interesting bit is the fact that e.g. white glace is rising damn fast, whereas goons only interdict gallente ice mining atm (may have missed some events, as I'm not really actively playing atm).
Pure speculation? Dev info leaked? Who knows... They have expanded their reach, it is now just not in Gallente space that they are paying out bounty's, you can get them in Caldari space now and soon Minimatari space. Could be just a matter of time before all of hisec miners are under attack.
Probably, but I have never seen a public announcement about said Bounties and given GSFs relatively strong PR, I should have seen something along those lines on the forums, despite only sporadically checking them.
Checking dotlan, there don't seem to be many kills in Caldari Ice mining systems as well, yet people are starting to buy white glaze as if there's no tomorrow... |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
244
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:46:00 -
[29] - Quote
Ironically, NONE of these arguments hold water until someone (CCP) can put percentages on the table justifying why the idea even needs a mention.
So little of nullsec ice is mined now. It's mostly purchased/hauled from highsec. A lot of it from 0.0 alliance bots.
Yes, there will be massive impacts on research, T2 invention and manufacture given that sooo much of that is done by the carebears in highsec.
Having said that, good moons are a rare commodity, not accessible to your average player and yet carebears still build and sell T2 with little problem.
I can't see loss of ice to highsec as a major issue providing, and this is the key, it becomes a profitable enough commodity to make 0.0 indy chars actually go mine it and transport it. And this concerns me. If they don't, T2 production, BPO research etc. will be left purely in the hands of 0.0. (not enough slots CCP!)
CCP would know that 0.0 MUST mine the ice if they remove it from highsec. If they don't, the Eve economists will react very quickly because inflation will go through the roof or worse, carebears will simply throw their hands up and say, I quit.
Of course, it could also promote alliances helping carebears get into 0.0 - if for nothing more than to ensure their own supply is maintained. Otherwise there will be CTA's for Mackinaw gangs to form up.
imho, the idea of a reduced supply is best solution. A scannable ice belt seems most logical. I run a single medium Blood faction tower for BPO research and I need less than 20 cubes of ice a day to run it. About 20 minutes work on 3 chars.
If you're a greedy pig with 20 towers and you're in highsec cash grabbing, then maybe you need to go do some real work out there.... you know.... space..... Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
541
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:48:00 -
[30] - Quote
nothing in 0.0 is mined because regular minerals are glutted thanks to the drone regions, so mining a/b/c/m ores in a hulk is less isk/hour than ratting, and isotope ice is a stupendously useless 15% better in 0.0 than highsec so obviously nobody touches that either |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
541
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
and like 95% of highsec ice miners are bots |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:59:00 -
[32] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:and like 95% of highsec ice miners are bots
You Sir are the bot...everytime bringing up that thesis is just causing me to yawn louder and louder as often i hear this coming from one of you guys from Goons.
bringing up the number about saying 95% from ice miners are bots is just laughable if not idiotic at all....sure there are bots...but there are also plenty of players just staying quite in local and only talking with their friends in fleetchat or corpchat while ice harvesting.....and if you blow up one of them, the most of them also stay quite and just warping to the station and dock cause yelling and screaming and cursing at the gankers only fills their egos and many from the miners know about this fact.....and if you think this behauviour makes someone beeing a bot so you are wrong.
That said...i brougth it up a bit above, there are many players which come home from a stressfull day at work and just wanted nothing more then just mine / harvest and relax while chatting with their friends. |

Name Family Name
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
35
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:59:00 -
[33] - Quote
The Apostle wrote: A lot of it from 0.0 alliance bots
I doubt it - I 've actually mined ice in high and using a bot for it would be overkill. If I mine ice, it's because i can use Hulk characters, fit them for cargo and check every 25 minutes whilst doing something else.
If I'd use a bot, I 'd let him belt-rat or at least have him mine roids. A bot woubld be heavily underchallenged mining ice. |

Simetraz
State War Academy Caldari State
93
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:03:00 -
[34] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:nothing in 0.0 is mined because regular minerals are glutted thanks to the drone regions, so mining a/b/c/m ores in a hulk is less isk/hour than ratting, and isotope ice is a stupendously useless 15% better in 0.0 than highsec so obviously nobody touches that either
Yes and No
A system with level 3 upgrades can mine high ends cycling the large belt and make stupid money. Which in turns gets shipped to high-sec. Sold and cheap Ice is bought and taken to 0.0.
As it stands right now Ice is mined in high-sec cause the profit margin as on par or in reality lower then mining Veldspar in high-sec.
Moving Ice to 0.0 would be well hilarious. Good luck with finding someone to mine it consistantly.
Carriers of old (Fighters vs Bombers and Fighter Screens) |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
244
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:06:00 -
[35] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:and like 95% of highsec ice miners are bots Not sure where the number comes from but seems fair , but how much of that is to fuel 0.0 and how much fuels highsec POS's... Who actually needs the yardstick taken to them? Highsec bears or 0.0 alliances?
Nonethelesss, the more I think about this, the more I like it.
Once thing for sure, if only 0.0 has the ice, they are NOT going to mine it for highsec unless the price becomes 100x what it is.
But some good things..... - It will force 0.0 alliances to be more independent and could force some very interesting chokepoints. - In reality, it's only going to kill off highsec POS's and it's not going to hurt T2 production 'cos just take it station side. - It WILL hurt BPO research, which might be a good thing (Apostle goes to market to buy up BPO's for research) - It may entice carebears out into "the void"....
What I find interesting is why GSF (given the CSM is mostly GSF) are pushing for this? It may well be a case of "be careful what you wish for"... It'd be far too easy to shut a 0.0 alliance down by doing the very thing that GSF is doing in highsec.
Unless...... unlesss...... You're also looking for a nerf on cloaky SB's or a buff to cyno-jammers??
I can smell the Scorch bomb cordite from here.... Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
541
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:11:00 -
[36] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Weaselior wrote:and like 95% of highsec ice miners are bots Not sure where the number comes from but seems fair , but how much of that is to fuel 0.0 and how much fuels highsec POS's... Who actually needs the yardstick taken to them? Highsec bears or 0.0 alliances?
I have no idea how I'd go about determining who owns a bot, but I do know that if you wanted to bot and had access to 0.0 you'd make much more money running a ratting bot or something else a lot more profitable. 0.0 buys its fuel in jita, and does not mine ice: it's far better to rat for ten minutes and purchase ice with isk than mine for an hour. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
541
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:13:00 -
[37] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:Weaselior wrote:and like 95% of highsec ice miners are bots You Sir are the bot...everytime bringing up that thesis is just causing me to yawn louder and louder as often i hear this coming from one of you guys from Goons. bringing up the number about saying 95% from ice miners are bots is just laughable if not idiotic at all....sure there are bots...but there are also plenty of players just staying quite in local and only talking with their friends in fleetchat or corpchat while ice harvesting.....and if you blow up one of them, the most of them also stay quite and just warping to the station and dock cause yelling and screaming and cursing at the gankers only fills their egos and many from the miners know about this fact.....and if you think this behauviour makes someone beeing a bot so you are wrong. That said...i brougth it up a bit above, there are many players which come home from a stressfull day at work and just wanted nothing more then just mine / harvest and relax while chatting with their friends.
hi having studied the highsec ice miner extensively (while killing him) and knowing the other people who have studied equally extensively or more, i am the resident expert on the subject and I can assure you that the things are bots
its one thing not to rage in local, it's another to continue mining in the belt as macks explode like clockwork every 15 minutes, ignore local where i announce ganks ahead of time, pod mine, etc |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
541
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:15:00 -
[38] - Quote
of course, right now gallente ice fields are mostly bot-free as those have been driven out, but if you were to take a stack of brutixes to some other ice space and proceeded to announce in local who you were going to gank, orbiting them in a blockade runner at 500m, then ganking them, then repeating the process for hours on end the only people warping out would be the people without an orca bot who are warping to station (who will come right back) |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:16:00 -
[39] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:The Apostle wrote:Weaselior wrote:and like 95% of highsec ice miners are bots Not sure where the number comes from but seems fair , but how much of that is to fuel 0.0 and how much fuels highsec POS's... Who actually needs the yardstick taken to them? Highsec bears or 0.0 alliances? I have no idea how I'd go about determining who owns a bot, but I do know that if you wanted to bot and had access to 0.0 you'd make much more money running a ratting bot or something else a lot more profitable. 0.0 buys its fuel in jita, and does not mine ice: it's far better to rat for ten minutes and purchase ice with isk than mine for an hour.
LOL So you want to get your iceproduction spoiled by this remove yourselfs....cause i'm pretty sure it was YOUR Master CEO The Mittani who brougth the Hisec ice remove on the table and nobody else.
That's so ironic i'm apparently laughing my bum off cause of this idiotic move and more. Giving the idea to CCP to remove hisec ice and then telling your cheapest resource for Ice products IS currently hisec.......OMG how stupid is that?! |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
542
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:18:00 -
[40] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: LOL So you want to get your iceproduction spoiled by this remove yourselfs....cause i'm pretty sure it was YOUR Master CEO The Mittani who brougth the Hisec ice remove on the table and nobody else.
That's so ironic i'm apparently laughing my bum off cause of this idiotic move and more. Giving the idea to CCP to remove hisec ice and then telling your cheapest resource for Ice products IS currently hisec.......OMG how stupid is that?!
i sincerely doubt mittens came up with the idea of moving it as I doubt he would have remembered ice fields existed unpromped until we started butchering them like swine
we don't mine |

Rocky Deadshot
In The Goo EVE Trade Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:23:00 -
[41] - Quote
Possible idea- Make some npc stations (or player) in low/null that offer much higher return from ice... like double of that in high sec. This would mine mining near these stations would obviously be encouraged, but so would the selling of unrefined ice to Jump Freighters to transport to max yield stations. Everyone wins here a little. High sec miners get to keep their ice mining, a pretty much passive income that can be done for long amounts of time Low sec gangs get new possible targets as industrial transport ice through sectors Null sec (and low maybe) will see increased mining of Ice, as it might be safer than trying to transport it, as well as possibly seeing a decrease in cost to run their facilities due to increased refining.
Goons - Still get fun targets to hit in high sec
|

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
542
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:23:00 -
[42] - Quote
if ice was moved to 0.0 only that'd be pretty rad we could hire worthless pubbies to mine then whip them when they don't make quota |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
244
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:25:00 -
[43] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:The Apostle wrote:Weaselior wrote:and like 95% of highsec ice miners are bots Not sure where the number comes from but seems fair , but how much of that is to fuel 0.0 and how much fuels highsec POS's... Who actually needs the yardstick taken to them? Highsec bears or 0.0 alliances? I have no idea how I'd go about determining who owns a bot, but I do know that if you wanted to bot and had access to 0.0 you'd make much more money running a ratting bot or something else a lot more profitable. 0.0 buys its fuel in jita, and does not mine ice: it's far better to rat for ten minutes and purchase ice with isk than mine for an hour. 'Tis true but in some aspects you could be inadvertently assisting ice bots. If the price continues to climb you make the "risk v reward" argument a fait accompli.
Ice bots are simply a lazy option to either 1) make "passive" isk while you sleep or 2) fuel massive 0.0 logistics.
Both need a stick taken to them no doubt but you are making ice botting more attractive, not less.
The GSF campaign would have to last for so long, and be so concerted that the "Knight in Shining Armor" rhetoric will get very thin, very fast to a large number of your pilots.
Taking ice out of highsec would accomplish all of these objectives and much, much more. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
244
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:28:00 -
[44] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:if ice was moved to 0.0 only that'd be pretty rad we could hire worthless pubbies to mine then whip them when they don't make quota Where do I sign? I know for a fact that the whole DekCo network needs a LOT of ice. I could pretty well charge you whatever I damn well pleased 
And I like being whipped..... Is that a bonus?
TL;DR Sharpen up the Mack Axe boys..... Time to go get a slice of those Alliance funds... Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Name Family Name
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
35
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:30:00 -
[45] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:of course, right now gallente ice fields are mostly bot-free as those have been driven out, but if you were to take a stack of brutixes to some other ice space and proceeded to announce in local who you were going to gank, orbiting them in a blockade runner at 500m, then ganking them, then repeating the process for hours on end the only people warping out would be the people without an orca bot who are warping to station (who will come right back)
Lol - I don't care as I haven't ice mined in years, but the whole point in ice mining as a human was having a couple of minimized clients running whilst playing something else.
Gank them all the way - ice mining in hgh sec is a terrible mechanic, but having a bot Ice mining in high sec is a waste of CPU. |

Name Family Name
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
35
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:32:00 -
[46] - Quote
Name Family Name wrote:Weaselior wrote:of course, right now gallente ice fields are mostly bot-free as those have been driven out, but if you were to take a stack of brutixes to some other ice space and proceeded to announce in local who you were going to gank, orbiting them in a blockade runner at 500m, then ganking them, then repeating the process for hours on end the only people warping out would be the people without an orca bot who are warping to station (who will come right back) Lol - I don't care as I haven't ice mined in years, but the whole point in ice mining as a human was having a couple of minimized clients running whilst playing something else - not reacting to anything is actually an indication of a real human doing it. Gank them all the way - ice mining in hgh sec is a terrible mechanic, but having a bot Ice mining in high sec is a waste of CPU.
|

Tore Vest
Vikinghall
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:33:00 -
[47] - Quote
We are not going to need ice so mutch longer. Only poses and some lone jumpfreigther i guess. 0.0 can have icebelts... i dont care |

Carceret Rinah
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 01:07:00 -
[48] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:Jooce McNasty wrote:If its not do you really want to keep mining it in highsec while the Goons are on their current campaign? I support them in what they are doing but I do not know how long this will last and how wide spread it will get.
It would be cool to see them keep this campaign going for a year or more, especially if they are willing on spending the isk to keep the hulks dying. You really have no clue what you're talking about HUH?......If they remove all curenntly in hisec located ice into lowsec and 0.0 you can expect the market break through the roof and then collapse in a big bang followed by hundreds of hisec players leaving the game if not thousands of them.....if ice can't get mined anymore in hisec and keep the price in a somwhat tolerable and affordable range most the hisec POSes in hisec and also lowsec will get removed and construction research and much other stuff will come to a nearly complete halt. Simply due to the fact Hisec research facilitys will get swamped and blocked more for months from a few keeping their jobs within the queue while the rest can suffer their soon forseeable financial dead. If you really want this happen...or talking about the remove without having a idea what the consequences will be of this totally unneeded move you better should stay quite and go in a corner and get ashamed by your incompetence.
I suggest adapting. Raise your prices to make up for the rising cost of fuel. If that's not possible, and nullsec industrialists destroy highsec research and industry... join a nullsec corp and do it there.
Otherwise start talking with people about maybe fighting back. Start securing those ice ops. |

Russell Casey
One Ton the dragons of eve
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 02:45:00 -
[49] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:if ice was moved to 0.0 only that'd be pretty rad we could hire worthless pubbies to mine then whip them when they don't make quota
Sad thing is, it would work or I should say, does work.... |

Mortis vonShadow
Balanaz Mining and Development Inc.
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 03:25:00 -
[50] - Quote
As an Empire miner (Veldspar, Scordite, Pyroxeres, Kernite) I make approx 50-60mil a day. Yes, I sit for 4-5hours in front of my pc listening to the hum of the strip miners. I currently have two toons, one is industry and one is combat (pvp/pve).
Sometimes I buy two PLEX to pay for my time, others, I pay good ol' fashion American $$. With two accounts at 14.95ea. and a $2.00 forgien transaction fee as well, I pay roughly $37 a month to play EVE. And I'm happy to do it, too. My wife, not so much.
Even with all the screaming and hollering about how broken the game is with nullsec sov mechanics or with the supercap issues, or even with the Goons trying to corner the blue ice market. I love this game. I love the community of it. For better or worse, I will always be here to play.
What does concern me, tho, is all this talk about real money transfers and bots. I don't pretend to know if those out in nullsec do use bots. I don't pretend to know that the Goons are the biggest user of bot programs. But, what I do know is that CCP has started a player driven organization called the Council of Stellar Management. The CSM was started as a way for the players to voice their concerns with CCP about game related issues. If the CSM is comprised mainly of players from the Goons, and the Goons are one of the largest, if not the defacto largest player base in the game, then its not hard to come to a conclusion that somewhere along the way the CSM has lost the voice of the players, and become the voice of the Goons.
On any other subject I wouldn't care less if the entire CSM was comprised of all Goons. But, with all this talk of moving more mining related stuff out of Empire space to nullsec, where the Goons control most of it anyways, then we are just putting more ISK into the Goons wallets. By itself, its nothing, and I could give two ***** about it. But, with all this talk about RMT's taking place out in nullsec, and CCP wanting to put more ISK into the Goons hands, or any other large alliance out in nullsec (Sorry Goonies, I'm just using you guys as an example), I have to begin to wonder if some sort of duplicity, whether intentional or not, on CCP's part isn't taking place.
If CCP is oblivious to the fact that quite possibly they are being taken advantage of for RMT's, then the best solution for them, so there is no question in anyones mind, is to immediately do away with botting. I know they can trace their own clients from their servers, so its not an unrealistic ability. However, if they are complicit in their dealings with the Goons, or any other large alliance out in nullsec, who are using bots for the sole purpose of RMT's and if they are in some fashion getting returns for this, then this is nothing more than perpatrating fraud on the player base, which is against the law, everywhere in the world, except for Somalia.
I'm not accusing anyone of botting, and I'm definately not accusing anyone of RMT's or CCP's hand in any of it. I'm just drawing a possible conclusion based on what I've read in the last two weeks here on the forums and in the blogs by the Devs about moving mining related stuff out of Empire to nullsec.
I love my sandbox, and I love the other kids that play in it. Goons too. They add a spice to the game that you can't find anywhere else. But, it scares the hell out of me that quite possibly CCP is being taken advantage of all in the name of "better game mechanics".
You may commence flamming this post now. Enjoy. I know I'm going to. Some days you're the bug, and some days your the windscreen. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á And some days, you're just a man with a gun. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
460
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 03:32:00 -
[51] - Quote
That's a whole lot of :words: to say "Wahhhh the Goons are running my game!!!" The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Sri Nova
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 03:33:00 -
[52] - Quote
throwing out the old roid system and implementing a new roid system would be ideal .
make the belts true belts they actually form rings around the stars moons and planets.
remove the way points to belts . either use the current probing system to find roids or put that roid scanner to some actual use.
then to to top it all off increase the number of roids in these belts several fold . reduce the respawn to once a week .
and then to add a lil flavor scatter some hard to find junk around certain celestials nothing major and nothing to get rich by . but just enough to tantalize . |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
249
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 03:39:00 -
[53] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:That's a whole lot of :words: to say "Wahhhh the Goons are ruining my game!!!" Fixed it for ya.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Circumstantial Evidence
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 04:07:00 -
[54] - Quote
CCP Greyscale - 2011.08.19 13:55:00 wrote:for anyone who's not following we're leaning towards just making ice in empire non-infinite rather than removing it http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1565827&page=10#291 |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
249
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 04:16:00 -
[55] - Quote
Circumstantial Evidence wrote: Evidence of their intent? All circumstantial at best. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Terminal Entry
Intelli-Services
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 06:10:00 -
[56] - Quote
Just remove all Ice from the game and have POSes powered from a reactor, just like the capacitor is in ships.
The less 'Logistics-Online' the better.
|

Oswald Patsee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 06:49:00 -
[57] - Quote
^ This.
Ok, so lets see...
- CCP is lookibng at rebalancing hisec ice in the interests of improving nullsec "risk v reward"
- Hisec ice is the least profitable thing anyone can mine.
- CCP wants to limit something that is worth basically nothing in hisec to help nullsec?
I'm not seeing the logic here. Unless, of course, this is about choking off the supply of Blue Ice so nullsec alliances can fight over the one in game resource we all need for capship blobfests. Ok, so lets get rid of any need for blue ice in hisec.
Hate to say it, but this is self serving sh*t. Yet another reason why a lot of players choose to stay out of nullspace and stay in hisec - They'd rather get treated like crap on their own terms than ours. Leave them and their ice alone. They don't really change the nullsec game, and nullsec doesn't need to change theirs.
And yes. This is an alt. Obvious. |

Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
65
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 07:14:00 -
[58] - Quote
Mortis vonShadow wrote:As an Empire miner (Veldspar, Scordite, Pyroxeres, Kernite) I make approx 50-60mil a day. Yes, I sit for 4-5hours in front of my pc listening to the hum of the strip miners. I currently have two toons, one is industry and one is combat (pvp/pve). etc etc etc
I'm not going to repost a large amount of text.
All I would like to say is - Well written Sir, very well said indeed. It worries me too and one certainly hopes that CCP is fully aware of the RMT going on.
Cheers.
The door is not real. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
462
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 08:12:00 -
[59] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:Mortis vonShadow wrote:As an Empire miner (Veldspar, Scordite, Pyroxeres, Kernite) I make approx 50-60mil a day. Yes, I sit for 4-5hours in front of my pc listening to the hum of the strip miners. I currently have two toons, one is industry and one is combat (pvp/pve). etc etc etc I'm not going to repost a large amount of text. All I would like to say is - Well written Sir, very well said indeed. It worries me too and one certainly hopes that CCP is fully aware of the RMT going on. Cheers. That was a horrible, horrible post. Don't encourage him.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Herold Oldtimer
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 09:16:00 -
[60] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:if ice was moved to 0.0 only that'd be pretty rad we could hire worthless pubbies to mine then whip them when they don't make quota
Won't this contradict with your NBSI policy?
Or do you plan to start liking worthless pubbies now. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
545
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 09:38:00 -
[61] - Quote
Mortis vonShadow wrote:As an Empire miner (Veldspar, Scordite, Pyroxeres, Kernite) I make approx 50-60mil a day. Yes, I sit for 4-5hours in front of my pc listening to the hum of the strip miners. I currently have two toons, one is industry and one is combat (pvp/pve).
Sometimes I buy two PLEX to pay for my time, others, I pay good ol' fashion American $$. With two accounts at 14.95ea. and a $2.00 forgien transaction fee as well, I pay roughly $37 a month to play EVE. And I'm happy to do it, too. My wife, not so much.
Even with all the screaming and hollering about how broken the game is with nullsec sov mechanics or with the supercap issues, or even with the Goons trying to corner the blue ice market. I love this game. I love the community of it. For better or worse, I will always be here to play.
What does concern me, tho, is all this talk about real money transfers and bots. I don't pretend to know if those out in nullsec do use bots. I don't pretend to know that the Goons are the biggest user of bot programs. But, what I do know is that CCP has started a player driven organization called the Council of Stellar Management. The CSM was started as a way for the players to voice their concerns with CCP about game related issues. If the CSM is comprised mainly of players from the Goons, and the Goons are one of the largest, if not the defacto largest player base in the game, then its not hard to come to a conclusion that somewhere along the way the CSM has lost the voice of the players, and become the voice of the Goons.
On any other subject I wouldn't care less if the entire CSM was comprised of all Goons. But, with all this talk of moving more mining related stuff out of Empire space to nullsec, where the Goons control most of it anyways, then we are just putting more ISK into the Goons wallets. By itself, its nothing, and I could give two ***** about it. But, with all this talk about RMT's taking place out in nullsec, and CCP wanting to put more ISK into the Goons hands, or any other large alliance out in nullsec (Sorry Goonies, I'm just using you guys as an example), I have to begin to wonder if some sort of duplicity, whether intentional or not, on CCP's part isn't taking place.
If CCP is oblivious to the fact that quite possibly they are being taken advantage of for RMT's, then the best solution for them, so there is no question in anyones mind, is to immediately do away with botting. I know they can trace their own clients from their servers, so its not an unrealistic ability. However, if they are complicit in their dealings with the Goons, or any other large alliance out in nullsec, who are using bots for the sole purpose of RMT's and if they are in some fashion getting returns for this, then this is nothing more than perpatrating fraud on the player base, which is against the law, everywhere in the world, except for Somalia.
I'm not accusing anyone of botting, and I'm definately not accusing anyone of RMT's or CCP's hand in any of it. I'm just drawing a possible conclusion based on what I've read in the last two weeks here on the forums and in the blogs by the Devs about moving mining related stuff out of Empire to nullsec.
I love my sandbox, and I love the other kids that play in it. Goons too. They add a spice to the game that you can't find anywhere else. But, it scares the hell out of me that quite possibly CCP is being taken advantage of all in the name of "better game mechanics".
You may commence flamming this post now. Enjoy. I know I'm going to.
Two out of the 9 CSMs are in Goonswarm. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
464
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 10:23:00 -
[62] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Two out of the 9 CSMs are in Goonswarm. Which is disappointing. We're shooting for 8/9 next time. Trebor can stay so we can continue to make fun of "crowdsourcing".
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
545
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 10:41:00 -
[63] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Malcanis wrote:Two out of the 9 CSMs are in Goonswarm. Which is disappointing. We're shooting for 8/9 next time. Trebor can stay so we can continue to make fun of "crowdsourcing".
It'll be interesting to see if those who were hurfblurfing about the "unfairness" of the "nullse control" of the CSM will succeed in mobilising hi-sec dwellers to actually click a button on a web page for CSM 7. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Cipher Jones
86
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 10:48:00 -
[64] - Quote
CCP Zymurgist wrote:In CCP Greyscale's blog he discussed moving Ice to null sec as part of the 0.0 Industry revamp. It hasn't been decided yet if this will happen or not. I suggest checking out the archived Features and Ideas forum for some more info on what was discussed.
I suggest that the fact that you guys have not given a definitive "No" so far means that you truly still have your heads up your ass as far as giving the player base what they want.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

J'Poll
IMPERIAL LEGI0N
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 11:01:00 -
[65] - Quote
Zendoren wrote:My vote is to take away Belt Ice in high and low sec and move it to probeable grav sites. However for this to be a success, ice needs to be worth mining and as it stands right now (Goon ganking aside) Ice is not worth mining.
TL;DR 1) ice as Grav sites in empire space. 2) Reduce Iso requirements for POS and increase requirements for capital ships (adjust Iso's m3 also) 3) make ice depletable.
I can agree with this in a certain degree.
I would say make Ice more rare in high-sec, so less Ice holding systems, with that drop or lower the Ice related fuels for POS and increase the required isotopes to jump capitals.
But I totally agree that Ice belts should be depletable like the normal asteroid belts. This means those botters won't perma mine Ice and also that the market will change but not collapse as there will still be Ice on the high-sec markets (though in less quantities). If you do this and also increase the number of belts in low-sec / null-sec then players are more likely to move there as mining a rarer product to sell in highsec will mean big profits.
J'Poll Director / Recruiter - Borealis Mining Concern Recruiter - Imperial Legi0n
As a finishing touch, God created the Dutch |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
96
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 11:12:00 -
[66] - Quote
To the OP i suggest you really read the devblog link CCp Zymmie posted and the feed back threads
You will notice that the large majority of people are against removing them and posted some good valid reasons against removing them
So i don't think they will be removed , tho i do suspect you will not find them in belts anymore
Besides can you imagine all the whine of those carrier pilots who have to mine their own ice
Goons Delenda Est I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Junglistbeast
Massive PVPness
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 12:37:00 -
[67] - Quote
Move it out of High-Sec....
Why are so many people disinclined to explore the other areas of space in the game?
Want to get rich? Take risks!
Low-sec needs a boost, we need more people here and if that means miners to shoot, or combat pilots defending them then i say good!
0.0 needs a boost to indy capabilities, if moving Ice there means hat more indy types have to move there to do what they want. then win-win they make isk doing what they enjoy, 0.0 pilots get more of an industrial base in thier space. More targets to kill etc.
Botting is a seperate issue, what stops them farming ice in high-sec over 0.0 and low now? 0.0 bots aren't mining ice (mostly)!
Too many people wanting to play a Multiplayer game solo! |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
20

|
Posted - 2011.10.12 12:47:00 -
[68] - Quote
Thread cleaned. CCP Phantom | German Community Coordinator |
|

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
115
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 13:54:00 -
[69] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:Thread cleaned.
Does this mean CCP actually reads the concerns of people regarding threads like these and take them into consideration? One would hope so.
There are some severe cause/effect issues that would arise if ice were removed from highsec. I'm sure people have already covered the problems with maintaining pos's in high sec simply due to the massive spike in fuel prices, but even more importantly (to me) is the massive shockwaves this would have on wormhole life. You see, the first point I'd like to offer is this: People won't decide to go mine ice in low or null sec. They do so in high sec because that's simply who they are. They have no interest in areas of the game that are more dangerous; it's not a fault, it's their nature. You can't take the sand out of someone's sandbox and force them to play in someone else's... they'll simply take their bucket and shovel and go home. So what happens... well, obviously fuel dwondles and prices spike because there will be considerably less available on the market. This dramatically affects wormholes... areas of pure null space with no access to ice at all. The cost to maintain a pos in there would skyrocket, which would eventually drive many smaller corporations simply doing their own thing in the frontiers of Eve out. Will they go to null instead? No. Wormhole dwellers are the antithesis of null dwellers, favoring smaller yet more dangerous aspects of the game, the opposite of what null offers. Many will simply leave, leaving fewer wealthier corps existing in holes. Now... the cost of maintaining their pos's is still spiking, that needs to be made up somehow. The only way that can happen is on a resource that wormholes have primary control over... T3 ships and products. You'll see a massive spike on T3 ship and subroutine costs. I heard tengus were once a billion or so isk... imagine looking at that as cheap? Yeah... it'll happen as a matter of survival.
Hopefully CCP actually has someone that sits down and really, really thinks out the long term rippling effect decisions like this will have on the whole of the game. You need someone that's simply doesn't declare "Gee, it'll make more people go to null!" without actually considering human nature and reality. Removing ice from high sec would cause irreparable damage to the economy, high sec pos life and wormhole life. Such an ill-fated concept needs to be allowed to die an ignoble and lonely death. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 14:00:00 -
[70] - Quote
The ice need to be sepparated in good ice and bad ice, bad ice keeps in high sec, good ice gets in 0.0. This requirs a whole ice belt overhaul witch is easy done with some scripting... |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
115
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 14:15:00 -
[71] - Quote
Mr LaboratoryRat wrote:The ice need to be sepparated in good ice and bad ice, bad ice keeps in high sec, good ice gets in 0.0. This requirs a whole ice belt overhaul witch is easy done with some scripting...
There's already "better" ice in null than in high sec. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Victor Dathar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 15:07:00 -
[72] - Quote
What about yellow snow? |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
550
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 16:02:00 -
[73] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote:Mr LaboratoryRat wrote:The ice need to be sepparated in good ice and bad ice, bad ice keeps in high sec, good ice gets in 0.0. This requirs a whole ice belt overhaul witch is easy done with some scripting... There's already "better" ice in null than in high sec.
emphasis on the quotes
0.0 isotope ice is never ever ever worth mining and I don't think the dark glitter stuff that's 0.0 only is either |

Akara Ito
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 16:13:00 -
[74] - Quote
Terminal Entry wrote:Just remove all Ice from the game and have POSes powered from a reactor, just like the capacitor is in ships.
The less 'Logistics-Online' the better.
Guess what the reactors would be fuelled with ?
|

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
118
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 16:20:00 -
[75] - Quote
Akara Ito wrote:Terminal Entry wrote:Just remove all Ice from the game and have POSes powered from a reactor, just like the capacitor is in ships.
The less 'Logistics-Online' the better.
Guess what the reactors would be fuelled with ? 
Enriched Uranium, water, robotics and mechanical parts? (Can't really justify oxygen here...) Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
94
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 16:55:00 -
[76] - Quote
Akara Ito wrote:Terminal Entry wrote:Just remove all Ice from the game and have POSes powered from a reactor, just like the capacitor is in ships.
The less 'Logistics-Online' the better.
Guess what the reactors would be fuelled with ?  SCIMITARS!!!! o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Mr LaForge
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
78
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 16:55:00 -
[77] - Quote
Victor Dathar wrote:What about yellow snow?
Would be unfair to the other colors. |

Sarrgon
Avalonians United
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 18:20:00 -
[78] - Quote
How about depletable Ice roids in high sec, unlimited Ice like it is now in 0.0and low sec. So people still can get some ice in high sec, but not unlmited like it is now. Which would mean most of the ice would have to come from 0.0, some would come from low sec and hi sec. |

Circumstantial Evidence
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 18:31:00 -
[79] - Quote
Look back a few posts... http://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=174938#post174938 |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
121
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:05:00 -
[80] - Quote
Sarrgon wrote: How about depletable Ice roids in high sec, unlimited Ice like it is now in 0.0and low sec. So people still can get some ice in high sec, but not unlmited like it is now. Which would mean most of the ice would have to come from 0.0, some would come from low sec and hi sec.
That would likely still fail to push people into null. There's a reason people aren't in null sec. They don't want to be. Period. The whole mega-alliance supercap flavor simply doesn't suit most people. You can't take away the sand from some people's sandbox and think they'll go play in sandboxes they don't like. So, with a decreased supply of ice fuels, you'll wind up with the same problem of pos's becoming more and more expensive to maintain, negatively affecting high sec research and wormholes in general. T3 prices will still skyrocket, etc. etc.
If you make high sec and wormholes dependant on low and null sec in order to survive... well, it'll be bad. Devastatingly so. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
471
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:25:00 -
[81] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote:If you make high sec and wormholes dependant on low and null sec in order to survive... well, it'll be bad. Devastatingly so. That's fine. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Sarrgon
Avalonians United
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:52:00 -
[82] - Quote
Sure this may make some move to nullsec yet again, but for others, no matter what they do, they won't go. If they really want to get a lot back to 0.0, unnerf the anons..lol Plus a few other things and will have another mass exodus to 0.0. |

Kengutsi Akira
32
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:54:00 -
[83] - Quote
Sarrgon wrote: Sure this may make some move to nullsec yet again, but for others, no matter what they do, they won't go. If they really want to get a lot back to 0.0, unnerf the anons..lol Plus a few other things and will have another mass exodus to 0.0.
Yeah why not get it done an make the whole game like 0.0 Get rid of CONCORD. If the Ice interdiction has showed anything, theyre useless anyways |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
474
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:56:00 -
[84] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Yeah why not get it done an make the whole game like 0.0 Get rid of CONCORD. If the Ice interdiction has showed anything, theyre useless anyways Excellent ideas. I will mention them to Chairman For Life The Mittani.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Sarrgon
Avalonians United
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:09:00 -
[85] - Quote
How about this, larger the alliance, more bounty concord places on them in 0.0, make pvp semi profitable and promote more PVP. And larger the alliance is, more of a target you will be |

Khamal Jolstien
THORN Syndicate BricK sQuAD.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:14:00 -
[86] - Quote
Sarrgon wrote: How about this, larger the alliance, more bounty concord places on them in 0.0, make pvp semi profitable and promote more PVP. And larger the alliance is, more of a target you will be 
Do this, and I can assure you I'll enjoy podding my alts every day. |

EVE Stig
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:15:00 -
[87] - Quote
Sarrgon wrote: How about this, larger the alliance, more bounty concord places on them in 0.0, make pvp semi profitable and promote more PVP. And larger the alliance is, more of a target you will be 
and unlimitedly sized alliances as well. allow alliances to get as big as they want "Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"! |

Sarrgon
Avalonians United
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:20:00 -
[88] - Quote
No bounties on pods, but on the ships they fly, kinda like it is on ratting, just on 0.0 alliances  |

Harold Tuphlos
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:25:00 -
[89] - Quote
shoot purples errday?
because we would want the people undocking noobships not to get payed. |

EVE Stig
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:43:00 -
[90] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Kengutsi Akira wrote:Yeah why not get it done an make the whole game like 0.0 Get rid of CONCORD. If the Ice interdiction has showed anything, theyre useless anyways Excellent ideas. I will mention them to Chairman For Life The Mittani.
Given that all the things in the winter expansion were supposedly their ideas, wonder if this'll be in the Spring one
"Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"! |

Kiran
Knights of Azrael
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:45:00 -
[91] - Quote
The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.
1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.
2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)
3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.
If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox. |

Sarrgon
Avalonians United
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:50:00 -
[92] - Quote
Well like ratting, bigger the ship higher the bounties, smaller the ship smaller the bounties and small like in ratting so it wouldn't nearly cover the cost of the ship to avoid abuse. |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 22:08:00 -
[93] - Quote
Kiran wrote:The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.
1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.
2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)
3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.
If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox.
Exactly THIS....will happen and then CCP can slowly go over to kiss Eve good bye and if the trolls on the Forums doesn't will believe it remove Hisec ice and Eve REALLY will die horrible and slow dead. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
257
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 22:21:00 -
[94] - Quote
Kiran wrote:The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.
1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.
2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)
3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.
If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox. As much as I "carebear" these days and run POS's etc. this is not quite true.
The only thing a high-sec POS effectively allows is for you to work on BPO's/BPC's and copies. ALL of which can be done in stations - albeit, waiting 3 months for a slot. This can be easily remedied at the flick of a switch by CCP.
All production on any item that can be done in a highsec POS can also be done in station.
It will mean a rationalization of highsec POS's at worst but will it force 0.0 alliances to mine their own ice and this alone makes them very, very vulnerable. This can only be a good thing. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Terminal Entry
New Fnord Industries
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 02:36:00 -
[95] - Quote
Akara Ito wrote:Terminal Entry wrote:Just remove all Ice from the game and have POSes powered from a reactor, just like the capacitor is in ships.
The less 'Logistics-Online' the better.
Guess what the reactors would be fuelled with ? 
Exactly the same thing as ship reactors are of course! 
You seem to be wedded to the idea that POSes need to be fueled and that there isn't another way to balance them.
|

Kiran
Knights of Azrael
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 10:33:00 -
[96] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Kiran wrote:The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.
1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.
2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)
3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.
If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox. As much as I "carebear" these days and run POS's etc. this is not quite true. The only thing a high-sec POS effectively allows is for you to work on BPO's/BPC's and copies. ALL of which can be done in stations - albeit, waiting 3 months for a slot. This can be easily remedied at the flick of a switch by CCP. All production on any item that can be done in a highsec POS can also be done in station. It will mean a rationalization of highsec POS's at worst but will it force 0.0 alliances to mine their own ice and this alone makes them very, very vulnerable. This can only be a good thing.
Before POS's was released we had the same amount of industry slots in stations as we do today and with even less people playing you still had to wait 3 months for a slot. I can not see CCP giving high sec stations more industry slots.
I remeber I had to move to a 0.4 system to get any industry slots and this was in the time when 0.4 was still under concord protection. But with high sec now smaller than it use to be factory slots in empire are a lot less.
|

loser mclame fatty
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 11:02:00 -
[97] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: You Sir seems not gotten the point i wanted to bring up aside from the large impact Hiseciceremoving will have not only on infrastructure, market and economy it also will FORCE....i repeat me agein FORCE technically players to leave hisec to go to either lowsec or 0.0 to get what they need.....please understand there are peoples DOESN'T want to go there at all....they simply decided to stay in hisec cause of beeing saved before the stress low and 0.0 sec activity can cause....stress which if it really gets bad and hard kills every relaxing amount this game can and had for them.
Remember, some peoples are coming home from a stressfull day at work and loggin in to eve to have a bit relaxing activities here and enjoying their stay with some friends they have here as well....if this goes away....those players will go away ( leave ) as well and that Sir....is a promise which will happen if CCP is not finally ligthens up and starts to think a bit themselfes again.
holy **** do you also live in nigeria and have a large quantity of money you need me to help you move in exchange for a 20% cut but first you need a $5,000 tracking fee |

Alain Kinsella
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 11:03:00 -
[98] - Quote
The suggestion I had made in the old thread was to remote Ice completely (as a mining mechanic) and redo as P2 planet products (for the core products anyway - Stront would be made in the same reaction chambers that you do boosters in, giving a boost to Low). The Mackinaw would become a gas miner, though it would require some tank adjustment.
I still think this would be a reasonable idea, and would not take much dev work; Everything is there already, just extend to replace. |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 11:29:00 -
[99] - Quote
loser mclame fatty wrote:Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: You Sir seems not gotten the point i wanted to bring up aside from the large impact Hiseciceremoving will have not only on infrastructure, market and economy it also will FORCE....i repeat me agein FORCE technically players to leave hisec to go to either lowsec or 0.0 to get what they need.....please understand there are peoples DOESN'T want to go there at all....they simply decided to stay in hisec cause of beeing saved before the stress low and 0.0 sec activity can cause....stress which if it really gets bad and hard kills every relaxing amount this game can and had for them.
Remember, some peoples are coming home from a stressfull day at work and loggin in to eve to have a bit relaxing activities here and enjoying their stay with some friends they have here as well....if this goes away....those players will go away ( leave ) as well and that Sir....is a promise which will happen if CCP is not finally ligthens up and starts to think a bit themselfes again.
holy **** do you also live in nigeria and have a large quantity of money you need me to help you move in exchange for a 20% cut but first you need a $5,000 tracking fee
STFU and learn to read!! |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
101
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 11:30:00 -
[100] - Quote
Basicly the whole idea of moving people into low sec is flawed with the current alliance pvp only mentallity and politics
At the moment ,how i see it is is actually easier and cheaper for nullsec alliance just to mine the abc ores and exploit moons for moo goo , take what they need for their own use and sell the rest in high sec and buy their low end minerals and ice products there and still end up with a huge profit, which makes sense
It is not that there aren't any opportunities for a ondustrial in nullsec, just the mentallity isn't there to expand a alliance industrial base and to become selfsufficient What hardcore pvp pilot would want to babysit over a bunch of iceminers while he could do plexes and earn a few 100 millions Second most ex nullsec dwellers eventually left nullsec because they despise the politics and the drama or got sick and tired being treated as second rat e citizen or ending up as target practice by a alliance that is actually blue to the sov holding alliance they belong or rent from
Alot of people who are into industry or mining i know in high sec really want to have a go in nullsec but sadly like i said before the mentallity and current sov mechanics making this very hard of not impossible
And removing high sec ice will certainly not get more people into null sec
just my thoughts I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 11:35:00 -
[101] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:Basicly the whole idea of moving people into low sec is flawed with the current alliance pvp only mentallity and politics
At the moment ,how i see it is is actually easier and cheaper for nullsec alliance just to mine the abc ores and exploit moons for moo goo , take what they need for their own use and sell the rest in high sec and buy their low end minerals and ice products there and still end up with a huge profit, which makes sense
It is not that there aren't any opportunities for a ondustrial in nullsec, just the mentallity isn't there to expand a alliance industrial base and to become selfsufficient What hardcore pvp pilot would want to babysit over a bunch of iceminers while he could do plexes and earn a few 100 millions Second most ex nullsec dwellers eventually left nullsec because they despise the politics and the drama or got sick and tired being treated as second rat e citizen or ending up as target practice by a alliance that is actually blue to the sov holding alliance they belong or rent from
Alot of people who are into industry or mining i know in high sec really want to have a go in nullsec but sadly like i said before the mentallity and current sov mechanics making this very hard of not impossible
And removing high sec ice will certainly not get more people into null sec
just my thoughts
Pretty much this i agree to....and technically all pro's and con's allready have been said....so i think it's about time CCP makes realy a final statement about the whole topic in regards to removing ice completely from hisec.
Come on CCP....lets hear your voice its about time NOW!! |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
556
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:25:00 -
[102] - Quote
Currently, hi-sec ice is generating a whole lot of gameplay and tears. As far as I'm concerned, it should stay. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Smiley Smile
Invisible Speculum
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:28:00 -
[103] - Quote
In a weird way, the Goon campaign is proving that moving ice into null and allowing it to be controlled (like moons) causes prices to skyrocket and access to drop. Why Goons are choosing to make that point is something I don't know, as I'm unsure whether the leadership does or does not want ice to disappear.
It was flagged in the initial announcement (on the gank campaign) as the weakest link in the economy. Proving how fragile it is might bolster the argument to make ice commodities more stable and available - ie, keep it in highsec and maybe expand th number of systems.
I only worry about wormholes if ice were to move to null and be more easily manipulated, as the POS is the core of WH life.
As a WH roamer, though, I like the idea of finding more and more POS that have run out of fuel ;)
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
556
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:31:00 -
[104] - Quote
Smiley Smile wrote:In a weird way, the Goon campaign is proving that moving ice into null and allowing it to be controlled (like moons) causes prices to skyrocket and access to drop.
It's way too early in the campaign to properly make this argument. We're barely out of the initial price shock.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
102
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:39:00 -
[105] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Smiley Smile wrote:In a weird way, the Goon campaign is proving that moving ice into null and allowing it to be controlled (like moons) causes prices to skyrocket and access to drop. It's way too early in the campaign to properly make this argument. We're barely out of the initial price shock.
Actually just the idea or rumour will send prices shyhigh in RL trading and it does the same in EVE I might despise the goons for all their rethoric and sometimes plain childish behavoir , sometimes they do hit the right note
Tho this could be accidently I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
596
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:40:00 -
[106] - Quote
Smiley Smile wrote:In a weird way, the Goon campaign is proving that moving ice into null and allowing it to be controlled (like moons) causes prices to skyrocket and access to drop. Why Goons are choosing to make that point is something I don't know, as I'm unsure whether the leadership does or does not want ice to disappear.
It was flagged in the initial announcement (on the gank campaign) as the weakest link in the economy. Proving how fragile it is might bolster the argument to make ice commodities more stable and available - ie, keep it in highsec and maybe expand th number of systems.
I only worry about wormholes if ice were to move to null and be more easily manipulated, as the POS is the core of WH life.
As a WH roamer, though, I like the idea of finding more and more POS that have run out of fuel ;)
everyone, including every ccp employee considering it, knows moving ice to 0.0 would cause prices to increase and access to drop, that would be the point |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
596
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:41:00 -
[107] - Quote
really the only argument our campaign makes to ccp is "woo we can have fun with these highsec ice belts" |

Woo Glin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:43:00 -
[108] - Quote
Removing ice from hisec won't do anything to move people into 0.0. The ice miners will just mine veldspar or scordite or whatever else they can find, as many have been doing in Gallente space as of late. The fact that they'll make less is a moot point as they're already mining (in hisec) and making pennies to begin with.
It's easy to get into a 0.0 alliance, even one with sov, in nearly any region of space with few exceptions. The reality is that the vast majority of the player-base has absolutely no interest in PvP in any form, be it consensual or non-consensual, and would rather run the isk-treadmill in the warm bosom of concord.
Don't hold your breath for any nerfs to hisec incomes. Those players are by far the least demanding portion of their subscription base. EVE is being relegated to the back burner and the hisec population is the key to EVE's long-term profitability. |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
102
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:49:00 -
[109] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Smiley Smile wrote:In a weird way, the Goon campaign is proving that moving ice into null and allowing it to be controlled (like moons) causes prices to skyrocket and access to drop. Why Goons are choosing to make that point is something I don't know, as I'm unsure whether the leadership does or does not want ice to disappear.
It was flagged in the initial announcement (on the gank campaign) as the weakest link in the economy. Proving how fragile it is might bolster the argument to make ice commodities more stable and available - ie, keep it in highsec and maybe expand th number of systems.
I only worry about wormholes if ice were to move to null and be more easily manipulated, as the POS is the core of WH life.
As a WH roamer, though, I like the idea of finding more and more POS that have run out of fuel ;)
everyone, including every ccp employee considering it, knows moving ice to 0.0 would cause prices to increase and access to drop, that would be the point
indeed and in the worse case scenario forces most of the players to stop playing eve since you, in the worse case scenario, killed off the playerdriven economy, which is one of the 2 basic foundations this whole sandbox rest on other one being the non conse whatever ...pvp, what would you fight for if nobody buys your abc ores or moongoo anymore
This is in the worse case scenario tho
Goons Delenda Est
I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Woo Glin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:49:00 -
[110] - Quote
See also: The chinese server, where the playerbase is small enough that major parts of the economy don't function properly due to a lack of players to run the complex extraction/refining/manufacturing chains necessary for sustained production. If anything, I would expect any potential re-balancing of moons to make better use of both low-ends and alchemy. PI followed this same path. Don't look for low-value/high-volume items like ice to leave hisec anytime soon. |

Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
70
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:50:00 -
[111] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Currently, hi-sec ice is generating a whole lot of gameplay and tears. As far as I'm concerned, it should stay.
Now that's the spirit. Gameplay, tears and profit. Any Ferengi would be proud.  Your campaign has certainly generated a good amount of very interesting dynamics. The door is not real. |

Simetraz
State War Academy Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:59:00 -
[112] - Quote
You know make one fuel for high-sec POS's. One for WH Pos's. And get rid of high-sec ice and let 0.0 figure it out how they are going to fuel all their POS's.
Problem solved.
Carriers of old (Fighters vs Bombers and Fighter Screens) |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |