Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Corey Fumimasa
Royal Caldari Imperial Guard Imperium Directive
129
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 15:10:00 -
[61] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:Eh, don't bother. Jorma has been posting for years now. Wasn' t the sharpest tool in the shed before, nothings changed.
Tutoring Jorma in economics is like showing a chicken the Space Shuttle. For you economy means "only lazy people can earn money". In other words (in EVE): Economy: ganker gets profit Non-economy: miner gets profit
Are you RPing Minmatar here?
This is a youtube playlist going over my first 30 ship losses. Video sucks but the audio came out well.There are some good lessons, and if you know the game there's some funny stories. |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
699
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 15:36:00 -
[62] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:Eh, don't bother. Jorma has been posting for years now. Wasn' t the sharpest tool in the shed before, nothings changed.
Tutoring Jorma in economics is like showing a chicken the Space Shuttle. For you economy means "only lazy people can earn money". In other words (in EVE): Economy: ganker gets profit Non-economy: miner gets profit Are you RPing Minmatar here?
Textbook example of Dunning - Kruger effect in action.
Don't make excuses for it, just accept it. |

March rabbit
player corp n1
536
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 15:39:00 -
[63] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:A Procurer costs 7 Million ISK, and has almost 30K EHP untanked. Yeah, makes sense.  Fun fact. My arbi with a 1600 plate has less tank than an untanked procurer. It also barely out tanks an untanked mack which now has a bigger base EHP than the heavy assault ships. you know what to do: start arbi-geddon with all power of your mighty alliance. And after some time CCP will buff it.
(we all know that ganking arbitrators isn't fun and profitable anyway) |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
393
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 15:45:00 -
[64] - Quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_complex |

March rabbit
player corp n1
536
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 15:50:00 -
[65] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote: Whatever people think about ganking, its an active process. Gankers are actually 'playing' the game. Gankers need to know exactly how the game works - how to deal with Concord, how to assess a target, how to compromise those fits, how to work as a team. On top of handling logistics and 'white knights'. All at our expense in terms of extra accounts, ISK and effort.
not a ganker here but let me try. -how to deal with CONCORD - shoot and wait until it kills you? (oh, i forgot about spawning CONCORD somewhere far away... yes, that was great tactics :hands down:) -how to assess a target - setup your overview to show mining barges/exumers? -how to compromise those fits - open EFT, enter results of ship scanner, press "ALL V" and see where lowest EHP is? Yes, need to agree: choosing right Catalyst fit and ammo is complex task.... -how to work as a team: neutral cloaked scouts, fleet warp and broadcasting target? -handling logistics: loading "clean" Orca in trade hub, dropping ship from "clean" Orca, boarding it with ganking alt and warp to target? Yea, need to agree: all of it sounds like rocket science.....
Herr Wilkus wrote: Catalysts and Tornados weren't designed for gankers. Orca's weren't designed for ninjas. But we MADE them work, and when CCP discovered it, they nerfed them.
exactly. That's why Catalysts are paper-tank cannons and can still be used for ganking (even after mining barges buff). Tornadoes? I dunno. I have never heard about glass-cannon battlecruiser with DPS of battleship and agility of cruiser. And i have never heard about freighters killed by gank of tornadoes....
PS: i like name of your corp TEARS. This is what i see in your posts lately  |

Lascivit Mercator
17
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:01:00 -
[66] - Quote
why every mining op doesn't include a scimmy and a falcon/rook is beyond me... I like to multiply with sheep |

Verfanny
Seamap Solutions
27
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:04:00 -
[67] - Quote
Why is everything in GD always devolving about miners vs nullsec players?
It always goes like this:
Player 1: Ha ha I'm a high sec player and like them potatoes.
Player 2: AARRRRGH Those filthy miners can get many potatoes without risking their nuts, it's not fair for us mighty nullsec.
Player 3: Why do you care about potatoes when you get infine carrots because of your blue donut?
etc... |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
393
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:14:00 -
[68] - Quote
Lascivit Mercator wrote:why every mining op doesn't include a scimmy and a falcon/rook is beyond me...
Falcon is a bad ship for anything like that.
Mostly because you have massive targeting delay after decloaking = gank is already over before Falcon gets target lock.
Rook? What? You want to shoot gankers? Try 800mm Nado instead = even max fitted Catalyst goes down with two volleys of RF Fusion L. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7624
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:21:00 -
[69] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Lascivit Mercator wrote:why every mining op doesn't include a scimmy and a falcon/rook is beyond me... Falcon is a bad ship for anything like that. Mostly because you have massive targeting delay after decloaking = gank is already over before Falcon gets target lock. Rook? What? You want to shoot gankers? Try 800mm Nado instead = even max fitted Catalyst goes down with two volleys of RF Fusion L.
Jorma Morkiss in "sensible post in a suicide ganking thread" sensation! Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Corey Fumimasa
Royal Caldari Imperial Guard Imperium Directive
129
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:23:00 -
[70] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Lascivit Mercator wrote:why every mining op doesn't include a scimmy and a falcon/rook is beyond me... Falcon is a bad ship for anything like that. Mostly because you have massive targeting delay after decloaking = gank is already over before Falcon gets target lock. Rook? What? You want to shoot gankers? Try 800mm Nado instead = even max fitted Catalyst goes down with two volleys of RF Fusion L.
Prolly just having a logi ship on grid would be enough to dissuade gankers. Give a noob a few million to leave a couple of mining lazers off and fit remote repper's. Of course they may gank the noob, but thats ok, better than loosing a barge.
This is a youtube playlist going over my first 30 ship losses. Video sucks but the audio came out well.There are some good lessons, and if you know the game there's some funny stories. |
|

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1153
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:25:00 -
[71] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Lascivit Mercator wrote:why every mining op doesn't include a scimmy and a falcon/rook is beyond me... Falcon is a bad ship for anything like that. Mostly because you have massive targeting delay after decloaking = gank is already over before Falcon gets target lock. Rook? What? You want to shoot gankers? Try 800mm Nado instead = even max fitted Catalyst goes down with two volleys of RF Fusion L. Jorma Morkiss in "sensible post in a suicide ganking thread" sensation! It won't last. If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
393
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:29:00 -
[72] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:It won't last.
True, but you can't expect much from quad Gyro quad SeBo Nado. If someone wants it destroyed, not much tank to stop them. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7626
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:30:00 -
[73] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Malcanis wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Lascivit Mercator wrote:why every mining op doesn't include a scimmy and a falcon/rook is beyond me... Falcon is a bad ship for anything like that. Mostly because you have massive targeting delay after decloaking = gank is already over before Falcon gets target lock. Rook? What? You want to shoot gankers? Try 800mm Nado instead = even max fitted Catalyst goes down with two volleys of RF Fusion L. Jorma Morkiss in "sensible post in a suicide ganking thread" sensation! It won't last.
That's why it's so sensational. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
102
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:37:00 -
[74] - Quote
Verfanny wrote:Why is everything in GD always devolving about miners vs nullsec players?
It always goes like this:
Player 1: Ha ha I'm a high sec player and like them potatoes.
Player 2: AARRRRGH Those filthy gardeners can get many potatoes without risking their nuts, it's not fair for us mighty nullsec.
Player 3: Why do you care about potatoes when you get infinite carrots because of your blue donut?
etc...
Panties. Meet wad. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
699
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:41:00 -
[75] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote: Whatever people think about ganking, its an active process. Gankers are actually 'playing' the game. Gankers need to know exactly how the game works - how to deal with Concord, how to assess a target, how to compromise those fits, how to work as a team. On top of handling logistics and 'white knights'. All at our expense in terms of extra accounts, ISK and effort.
not a ganker here but let me try. -how to deal with CONCORD - shoot and wait until it kills you? (oh, i forgot about spawning CONCORD somewhere far away... yes, that was great tactics :hands down:) -how to assess a target - setup your overview to show mining barges/exumers? -how to compromise those fits - open EFT, enter results of ship scanner, press "ALL V" and see where lowest EHP is? Yes, need to agree: choosing right Catalyst fit and ammo is complex task.... -how to work as a team: neutral cloaked scouts, fleet warp and broadcasting target? -handling logistics: loading "clean" Orca in trade hub, dropping ship from "clean" Orca, boarding it with ganking alt and warp to target? Yea, need to agree: all of it sounds like rocket science.....
Here is your homework assignment: Write a script that can accomplish these tasks. Have yet to hear complaints about botting gankers.
The takeaway was, in case you missed it - was a comparison between activity level of miners and gankers. Didn't say ganking required a genius IQ - but it does require know-how and taking an interest in game mechanics.
Contrast that with miners who regularly leave slots empty on their Exhumers despite seeing barges exploding around them. Gank resistant, tanked Hulk/Mack fits were common place on the forums, the best fits often provided by the gankers themselves. And tanks weren't even strictly necessary - if you simply paid attention and stayed aligned.
If miners showed an equivalent interest in EVE game mechanics and fitting - rather than simply grinding ISK AFK with zero effort while watching movies - our ganking success rates would fall off to almost zero overnight. And miners who actively took an interest in their survival did quite well for themselves - pre-buff.
Gankers, who haven't figured this stuff out, fail all the time. Due to random number damage generation and random loot drops, even the best of us fail now and again. Because its a relatively complex task, and a single misclick or lag spike sinks you. And these days, ganking miners isn't even really profitable with max skills and perfect tactics. Fortunately, the ganking community is quick to assist the new gankers, and show them the ropes, help them get started. The sort of thing that I thought EVE was about.
Yet CCP changed game mechanics to REWARD disinterested, lazy, and automated play. ISBoxing, Massive cargo bays, 4x EHP, faster Concord, boarding/ejecting restrictions on gankers, increase sec penalties and kill rights.
Because botting, mining while tabbed out, running fleets of 20-100 Barges with garbage names and a 3rd party utility, thats EVE right? |

Kate stark
143
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:57:00 -
[76] - Quote
Lascivit Mercator wrote:why every mining op doesn't include a scimmy and a falcon/rook is beyond me...
because they aren't mining? bit of a give away.. MINING op. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
393
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 17:13:00 -
[77] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Lascivit Mercator wrote:why every mining op doesn't include a scimmy and a falcon/rook is beyond me... because they aren't mining? bit of a give away.. MINING op.
But it is a very good way to test how smart or stupid ganker (yes, they work solo, no team spirit) actually is.
Though I have yet to see successful anti-gank. They are usually too smart or underestimate capabilities of their ships. |

Corey Fumimasa
Royal Caldari Imperial Guard Imperium Directive
130
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 18:14:00 -
[78] - Quote
So the mining buffs do seem excessive; however I just took a procurer into lowsec to try out this incredible tank. I sent my drones after billbaords and sentry guns and gates. Attacked passing frigates with impunity. And eventually died in an epic fireball running for the gate from 4 other ships. It was really a lot of fun.
Next time Im going to drop the ancillary shield booster for ECM, and fit a drone link aug in the high or something. This ship isn't just a miner, what it really allows is for miners to get used to fighting a ship. Frig combat happens too quickly to learn from, this thing took almost a minute to kill. And all for 10 million ISK or something. Maybe thats what CCP was thinking when they designed it.
In any case if you like to mine, get one of those things and head into lowsec preferably with a few budides in the system behind you. I recommend a name like "bait ship one" or something.
This is a youtube playlist going over my first 30 ship losses. Video sucks but the audio came out well.There are some good lessons, and if you know the game there's some funny stories. |

Kate stark
143
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 18:17:00 -
[79] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Kate stark wrote:Lascivit Mercator wrote:why every mining op doesn't include a scimmy and a falcon/rook is beyond me... because they aren't mining? bit of a give away.. MINING op. But it is a very good way to test how smart or stupid ganker (yes, they work solo, no team spirit) actually is. Though I have yet to see successful anti-gank. They are usually too smart or underestimate capabilities of their ships.
the successful anti gank is called the retriever. i see them everywhere. |

I Love Boobies
All Hail Boobies
355
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 18:24:00 -
[80] - Quote
Put on a damage control, a couple invulnerability fields. Also, I am assuming you are using a Orca for boosting if you're doing mining ops like that. Put on shield and armor boosting command mods instead of all mining mods. Just put on the time reduction mining command module. Get 30k hp that way with decent shield resists. Also, keep repair drones in your Orca. ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o )
The world would be a better place if boobies ran the world instead of boobs. |
|

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
700
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 18:39:00 -
[81] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:
the successful anti gank is called the retriever. i see them everywhere.
If you are saying that 'You won't get ganked in a retriever.' I'll have to disagree. CODE goes through tons of them.
Younger gankers cut their teeth on them, and older gankers do it solo, mainly so they can squash the pod as well.
Also, its important to distinguish between older chars and younger vicims, and the damage you can do to them - in a relative sense. Its hilarous to blow away that 1 month old carrying all his worthless crap in an Itty II, even if the net worth isn't going to pay for your ship. Why? Because you took away everything he owned.
Younger, poorer miners are much easier to hurt. Killing their pod and implants can sometimes nearly wipe them out. Whereas, a five-year old player loosing a Hulk isn't as likely to be bothered. Losing a Hulk + a 500M ISK pod might sting, but anyone with 5 years invested in EVE isn't quitting over it.
On the other hand, if you are arguing that Retrievers DO get ganked - but they aren't hard to replace? Especially if you mine without implants, platinum insure and use cheap mods? Sure, the ganks won't really hurt.....much. |

Kate stark
145
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 18:58:00 -
[82] - Quote
let's not be silly. ganking happens, that's a fact.
the reality though, is what's more inconvenient. losing isk because you're mining less stuff because you're flying something suboptimal for mining? or losing isk because you're replacing disposable throw away ships?
now unless some one is literally stalking you and blowing you up every time you undock, the latter is less of an inconvenience, generally. |

Corey Fumimasa
Royal Caldari Imperial Guard Imperium Directive
130
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 19:02:00 -
[83] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:let's not be silly. ganking happens, that's a fact.
the reality though, is what's more inconvenient. losing isk because you're mining less stuff because you're flying something suboptimal for mining? or losing isk because you're replacing disposable throw away ships?
now unless some one is literally stalking you and blowing you up every time you undock, the latter is less of an inconvenience, generally.
Your right! When someone gets ganked they should loose the SP's required to fly that ship.
This is a youtube playlist going over my first 30 ship losses. Video sucks but the audio came out well.There are some good lessons, and if you know the game there's some funny stories. |

Kate stark
145
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 19:13:00 -
[84] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:Kate stark wrote:let's not be silly. ganking happens, that's a fact.
the reality though, is what's more inconvenient. losing isk because you're mining less stuff because you're flying something suboptimal for mining? or losing isk because you're replacing disposable throw away ships?
now unless some one is literally stalking you and blowing you up every time you undock, the latter is less of an inconvenience, generally. Your right! When someone gets ganked they should loose the SP's required to fly that ship.
T3s for everyone! |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1607
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 19:19:00 -
[85] - Quote
Dexen Echerie wrote:My impression was that worrying too much about tanking in hi-sec was pointless... mostly because if someone plans to get you in hi-sec, they'll find a way. Any suggestions for a good tanked Mack, then? Although its true they can always gank you, consider:
It takes more people. They may not always be able to get sufficient people on-line. Its more expensive. Gankers usually do not like "grinding for ISK", so they may not have much. 8 gankers can gank 4 untanked miners at a time, but only one tanked miner at a time. You are cutting into their productivity, and reducing the chances you will be the one getting ganked.
As for the tank, shield extenders, invulnerabilites, and a damage control. And do not forget the siege warfare mindlink and shield harmonizing ganglink for the Orca pilot. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
895
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 20:08:00 -
[86] - Quote
ProTip: You can safely assume that any ganker will be flying a Catalyst with anti-matter blasters, because 99% of gankers are completely devoid of imagination.
This means you can ignore EM & explosive resist and focus entirely on kinetic & thermal resist. Even assuming their debatable claims of 700DPS are true, what this really means is about 400 in kinetic & 300 in thermal for roughly ten seconds (assuming you're in 0.8 or above), so at most they'll do 4000 kinetic and 3000 thermal damage... but that's before resists. Getting your kinetic & thermal resists into the 75% range is actually pretty darn easy, which means after resists kick in you're looking at about 1000 kinetic and 750 thermal into your shields.
Next figure a decently tanked Mackinaw is going to have 5000+ shield HP alone and so we're looking at three suicide Catalysts just to break through the shields. Then your armor comes into play, which will probably soak another suicide Catalyst and after that you've got your DC2 giving you 60% resist in your hull (which is another two suicide Catalysts right there). So right there you're looking at at least five coordinated gank Catalysts to bring down a decently tanked Mackinaw. I'm sure other people out there have fits that can feed even more wannabes to CONCORD as well.
The final step though, for me at least, is a full flight of Vespa EC-600s. While they only have 1.5 of ECM (and can't be boosted past that, sadly), your Catalyst ganker only has a sensor strength of 11. While each drone only has about a 12% chance of jamming, with five up them you've got about a 60% of jamming them outright, which lowers their DPS to zero and turns them into Hors d'CONCORD (the jam will last longer than it takes for CONCORD to Zeus them out of existence).
That extra bit of randomness is also something gankers can't stomach at all, as they generally only gank if their little DPS spreadsheets promise them a 100% chance of success before they even undock.
So can such a ship still be ganked? Of course it can. Someone with a dozen ships could certainly take it down. But this isn't Hulkaggedon anymore, and this new generation of ganker has not shown anything near the level of organization that the Goons did back in the day.
Final part: Although a Retriever can't pack anywhere near the same level of tank as a Mackinaw (let alone a Skiff), it can still pack in enough to make it so that the number of Catalysts required to take it down would actually cost more than the Retriever itself. So in that respect a tanked Retriever is winning even when they lose and maye be the superior choice when it comes to gank resistance. EvE Forum Bingo |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
12893
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 20:34:00 -
[87] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Exhumer ganks are at a record low. General rule: any time someone asks Gǣis ganking on the rise?Gǥ, you can be pretty sure that it has become so rare that a single gank is enough to shock the general publicGǪ Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

stoicfaux
2376
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 21:04:00 -
[88] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
The final step though, for me at least, is a full flight of Vespa EC-600s. While they only have 1.5 of ECM (and can't be boosted past that, sadly), your Catalyst ganker only has a sensor strength of 11. While each drone only has about a 12% chance of jamming, with five up them you've got about a 60% of jamming them outright, which lowers their DPS to zero and turns them into Hors d'CONCORD (the jam will last longer than it takes for CONCORD to Zeus them out of existence).
This has come up before. ECM doesn't take effect until the end of the jam cycle (i.e. 20 seconds later.) So ECM drones aren't useful.
|

Ludi Burek
The Player Haters Corp
229
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 23:27:00 -
[89] - Quote
March rabbit wrote: not a ganker here but let me try. -how to deal with CONCORD - shoot and wait until it kills you? (oh, i forgot about spawning CONCORD somewhere far away... yes, that was great tactics :hands down:) -how to assess a target - setup your overview to show mining barges/exumers? -how to compromise those fits - open EFT, enter results of ship scanner, press "ALL V" and see where lowest EHP is? Yes, need to agree: choosing right Catalyst fit and ammo is complex task.... -how to work as a team: neutral cloaked scouts, fleet warp and broadcasting target? -handling logistics: loading "clean" Orca in trade hub, dropping ship from "clean" Orca, boarding it with ganking alt and warp to target? Yea, need to agree: all of it sounds like rocket science.....
Pretty close. Do it for a while and you'll find that you do not need to cloak the scout. Just approach miner and scan him and park next to him since he's afk anyway 
Also, orcas are for the perfectionist pros. I would just set up an undock bookmark and warp to it and then warp to uncloaked hauler alt parked right up the miners ass. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |