| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

cvcdsas
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 18:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
posted with alt for obvious reasons
Could CCP please consider a change in cloaking mechanisms to reduce AFK cloaking.
I have no issues with people being able to be cloaked / grief people while they are active in game. But AFK cloaking for 23.5 hours per days seems to be the only risk free activity in eve. I hear constantly that even high sec is not to be considered safe only safer so find it difficult to understand which this particular activity is completely risk free.
If cloaking were changed so that we had to manually reactivate the cloak ever 30 minutes or even every hour it would at least give some risk. I accept that everytime i undock with a cloaky in system i might get hot dropped why should there be absolutely no risk 23.5 hours per day for someone to AFK grief.
|

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
Let's talk about the reason for AFK cloaking, Local. Removal of local and the package that will replace it. Cloaking is working as intended, is not broken and already has massive drawbacks.
AFK cloaking is a perfectly viable mechanic to subvert locals 100%, risk free, instant intel.
Also cloaking is not responsible for hot drops, the actual mechanic that allows them is. CCP Zulu.....Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Sloppyslug
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
cvcdsas wrote:posted with alt for obvious reasons
Could CCP please consider a change in cloaking mechanisms to reduce AFK cloaking.
I have no issues with people being able to be cloaked / grief people while they are active in game. But AFK cloaking for 23.5 hours per days seems to be the only risk free activity in eve. I hear constantly that even high sec is not to be considered safe only safer so find it difficult to understand which this particular activity is completely risk free.
If cloaking were changed so that we had to manually reactivate the cloak ever 30 minutes or even every hour it would at least give some risk. I accept that everytime i undock with a cloaky in system i might get hot dropped why should there be absolutely no risk 23.5 hours per day for someone to AFK grief.
There is quite a few thread posts about this problem, with some good ideas, go check them out and support them, can find them here: CCP common prop.
I always thought the idea of a emp smartbomb from something like a titan which knocks out all ships cloaks within the system for say about 30min-60min, but prevents the titan from doomsdaying again for a long period of time and cannot warp, cloak etc like other doomsdays. Quote:Notes: You will be immobile for 30 seconds after firing this weapon. You will be unable to activate your jump drive or cloaking device for ten minutes after firing this weapon.
Just a quick thought, other electronic uses for the emp could be established also. I am not talking about the original doomsday dmg dealing smart bombs. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
and yet neither of you have given a reason why any change is needed. CCP Zulu.....Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

cvcdsas
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:11:00 -
[5] - Quote
So if we are happy with risk free activity in low sec / null sec why do people keep critizing people in high sec when they complaining about being ganked. Surely low risk fits with the ethos of game rather than no risk??? |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
cvcdsas wrote:posted with alt for obvious reasons
Could CCP please consider a change in docking mechanisms to reduce AFK docking.
I have no issues with people being able to be docked / hide from people while they are active in game. But AFK docking for 23.5 hours per days seems to be the only risk free activity in eve. I hear constantly that even high sec is not to be considered safe only safer so find it difficult to understand which this particular activity is completely risk free.
If docking were changed so that we had to manually redock ever 30 minutes or even every hour it would at least give some risk. I accept that everytime i undock i might get hot dropped, but why should there be absolutely no risk 23.5 hours per day for someone like me to AFK hide?
|

Sloppyslug
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mag's wrote:and yet neither of you have given a reason why any change is needed.
I talk of null sec spying. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
cvcdsas wrote:So if we are happy with risk free activity in low sec / null sec why do people keep critizing people in high sec when they complaining about being ganked. Surely low risk fits with the ethos of game rather than no risk??? The thing is high sec is actually riskier that null is with your lone AFK cloaker. At least you can see there is an enemy in null, with high sec you really have no idea who is going to try and gank your ass.
But I see you still don't wish to discuss, the actual cause of AFK cloaking.
Sloppyslug wrote:Mag's wrote:and yet neither of you have given a reason why any change is needed. I talk of null sec spying. Actually you posted ideas that nerfs cloaking.
CCP Zulu.....Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

cvcdsas
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:19:00 -
[9] - Quote
Danika Princip wrote:cvcdsas wrote:posted with alt for obvious reasons
Could CCP please consider a change in docking mechanisms to reduce AFK docking.
I have no issues with people being able to be docked / hide from people while they are active in game. But AFK docking for 23.5 hours per days seems to be the only risk free activity in eve. I hear constantly that even high sec is not to be considered safe only safer so find it difficult to understand which this particular activity is completely risk free.
If docking were changed so that we had to manually redock ever 30 minutes or even every hour it would at least give some risk. I accept that everytime i undock i might get hot dropped, but why should there be absolutely no risk 23.5 hours per day for someone like me to AFK hide?
Dont undock what you cant lose is a term I have frequently seen used in eve. Hide and grief without any risks not realy the same |

Sloppyslug
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mag's wrote: Actually you posted ideas that nerfs cloaking.
Yes in Null Sec where you would expect someone to be able to have full control over their own system. There needs to be a counter, with my idea it would be a massivly expensive counter, which would take time and effort, and be a risk to the titan also. Would limit the ships use also, to being one niche. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:24:00 -
[11] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:Mag's wrote: Actually you posted ideas that nerfs cloaking.
Yes in Null Sec where you would expect someone to be able to have full control over their own system. There needs to be a counter, with my idea it would be a massivly expensive counter, which would take time and effort, and be a risk to the titan also. Would limit the ships use also, to being one niche. But it's not their system, they merely have sovereignty. If they want to protect it, then take steps and measures to do just that.
If you want to rely upon and keep your 100%, risk free, instant intel tool called local, then people should be allowed to try and subvert it.
CCP Zulu.....Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Sloppyslug
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
The mechanics of eve without any local would change massivly, would be interesting to see how it turns out.
People would be using directional scan like its a click for **** button. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:The mechanics of eve without any local would change massivly, would be interesting to see how it turns out.
People would be using directional scan like its a click for **** button. Anyone with any sense of balance, knows that you cannot simply turn it off and hope for the best. It needs a package of changes to replace it, but you should have to do some work for your intel. At the moment, local gives it you on a plate.
CCP Zulu.....Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:05:00 -
[14] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:Mag's wrote: Actually you posted ideas that nerfs cloaking.
Yes in Null Sec where you would expect someone to be able to have full control over their own system. There needs to be a counter, with my idea it would be a massivly expensive counter, which would take time and effort, and be a risk to the titan also. Would limit the ships use also, to being one niche.
A counter to what exactly? A counter to your own cowardice? A counter to someone who isn't actually doing anything to anyone?
Why, exactly, is it a bad thing for me to be able to cloak up in your system and go afk, but a good thing for you to be able to dock or POS up and go afk? We're both as invulnerable as the other, and we both have the same effect on eachother's gameplay, IE we're a name in local that you can't find. That's it. Neither of us can do anything to the other without losing our invulnerability. |

Sloppyslug
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:10:00 -
[15] - Quote
Danika Princip wrote:Sloppyslug wrote:Mag's wrote: Actually you posted ideas that nerfs cloaking.
Yes in Null Sec where you would expect someone to be able to have full control over their own system. There needs to be a counter, with my idea it would be a massivly expensive counter, which would take time and effort, and be a risk to the titan also. Would limit the ships use also, to being one niche. A counter to what exactly? A counter to your own cowardice? A counter to someone who isn't actually doing anything to anyone? Why, exactly, is it a bad thing for me to be able to cloak up in your system and go afk, but a good thing for you to be able to dock or POS up and go afk? We're both as invulnerable as the other, and we both have the same effect on eachother's gameplay, IE we're a name in local that you can't find. That's it. Neither of us can do anything to the other without losing our invulnerability.
What you talking about lol? I just remove anti-cyno, and then drop a super cap fleet on that pos and take it down, then kill you. how do i uncloak you and kill you? |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:13:00 -
[16] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:
What you talking about lol? I just drop a super cap fleet on that pos and take it down, then kill you. how do i uncloak you and kill you?
Actually you put the pos into reinforced and wait how ever long the stront lasts. In other words, safe until DT if setup correctly.
CCP Zulu.....Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Sloppyslug
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:14:00 -
[17] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Sloppyslug wrote:
What you talking about lol? I just drop a super cap fleet on that pos and take it down, then kill you. how do i uncloak you and kill you?
Actually you put the pos into reinforced and wait how ever long the stront lasts. In other words, safe until DT if setup correctly.
Ok and then I can kill you right? No matter how much you argue it is possible take down a POS making there a counter. There is no counter for the cloak. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:20:00 -
[18] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:Ok and then I can kill you right? That is a counter. There is no counter for the cloak.
Well if I warp off after you've put it into reinforced then no and no one with any sense logs off in a pos in case it does get zapped while you are away. I'm not sure what argument you think you have here.
Oh and cloaks do have a counter and they also have massive drawbacks when activated.
CCP Zulu.....Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Sloppyslug
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:24:00 -
[19] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Sloppyslug wrote:Ok and then I can kill you right? That is a counter. There is no counter for the cloak.
Well if I warp off after you've put it into reinforced then no and no one with any sense logs off in a pos in case it does get zapped while you are away. I'm not sure what argument you think you have here. Oh and cloaks do have a counter and they also have massive drawbacks when activated.
You're getting off topic to what im saying, this is directed to safe spot afk cloaking and spying when needed.
People use HICS for a reason. There is a counter, there is a counter to all of what your saying, please tell me the counter for finding someone afk, in a random safe spot cloaked. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:30:00 -
[20] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:Mag's wrote:Sloppyslug wrote:Ok and then I can kill you right? That is a counter. There is no counter for the cloak.
Well if I warp off after you've put it into reinforced then no and no one with any sense logs off in a pos in case it does get zapped while you are away. I'm not sure what argument you think you have here. Oh and cloaks do have a counter and they also have massive drawbacks when activated. You're getting off topic to what im saying, this is directed to safe spot afk cloaking and spying when needed. People use HICS for a reason. There is a counter, there is a counter to all of what your saying, please tell me the counter for finding someone afk, in a random safe spot cloaked. You decide you could kill me on a whim inside a pos shield, sorry you got it wrong and went off topic. A hic is not a counter to me sitting safe inside a pos shield, again what argument do you think you have here?
Why should you need to find someone AFK in a safe spot? The fact you already know he's in the system, is a massive intel advantage.
CCP Zulu.....Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:39:00 -
[21] - Quote
cvcdsas wrote:posted with alt for obvious reasons yeah, obvious no balls to attract more afk cloaker to your system
cvcdsas wrote:Could CCP please consider a change in cloaking mechanisms to reduce AFK cloaking.
I have no issues with people being able to be cloaked / grief people while they are active in game. But AFK cloaking for 23.5 hours per days seems to be the only risk free activity in eve. why should afking in a properly prepared ship have any risks?
cvcdsas wrote:If cloaking were changed so that we had to manually reactivate the cloak ever 30 minutes or even every hour it would at least give some risk. I accept that everytime i undock with a cloaky in system i might get hot dropped why should there be absolutely no risk 23.5 hours per day for someone to AFK grief.
go back to high sec, there is no afk cloaking
Sloppyslug wrote: Yes in Null Sec where you would expect someone to be able to have full control over their own system.
there is no "your own system", no space is exclusively for you.
There is no reason why you should have the ability to blob/chase people out of any system in eve, if he is prepared well (docked, cloaked). Noone ever has brought valid reasons for this, there is no need for more safety in eve 0.0, there is alrady too much of it. Yes, afk cloaker on safe is safe but he is gaining nothing from that as he is afk, people crying for afk cloak counters want safety for their ratting activities, for making ISK and whatever in full safety. This is not a valid reason. |

Sloppyslug
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:40:00 -
[22] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Sloppyslug wrote:Mag's wrote:Sloppyslug wrote:Ok and then I can kill you right? That is a counter. There is no counter for the cloak.
Well if I warp off after you've put it into reinforced then no and no one with any sense logs off in a pos in case it does get zapped while you are away. I'm not sure what argument you think you have here. Oh and cloaks do have a counter and they also have massive drawbacks when activated. You're getting off topic to what im saying, this is directed to safe spot afk cloaking and spying when needed. People use HICS for a reason. There is a counter, there is a counter to all of what your saying, please tell me the counter for finding someone afk, in a random safe spot cloaked. You decide you could kill me on a whim inside a pos shield, sorry you got it wrong and went off topic. A hic is not a counter to me sitting safe inside a pos shield, again what argument do you think you have here? Why should you need to find someone AFK in a safe spot? The fact you already know he's in the system, is a massive intel advantage.
Ok your ability to try and bring up every obvious reason is baffling.
First I was answering Danikas message on the comparison to POS and afk cloak counters, i'm sorry if you felt you were a part of that.
The HIC was in response to you saying there was no counter to someone sitting safe in a POS warping away from being in the POS, just showing you there was a counter.
Because it stops you performing strategic operations. The unknown gives you a massive tactical advantage, Internal spys and scouting is how it should be leaked. Much like in modern warfare, you countinue to develop counters to everything which gives others an advantage over you.
If you have not noticed eve is based on counters upon counters, it is one of the reasons it is so interesting. |

Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:49:00 -
[23] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote: If you have not noticed eve is based on counters upon counters, it is one of the reasons it is so interesting.
exactly, this is why people sit afk in some systems, for diminishing the information intel is giving away for your advantage. There is no other counter against local. |

Sloppyslug
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 20:52:00 -
[24] - Quote
Robert Caldera wrote:Sloppyslug wrote: If you have not noticed eve is based on counters upon counters, it is one of the reasons it is so interesting.
exactly, this is why people sit afk in some systems, for diminishing the information intel is giving away for your advantage. There is no other counter against local.
This is another good point for Null Sec. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:00:00 -
[25] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:
Ok your ability to try and bring up every obvious reason is baffling.
First I was answering Danikas message on the comparison to POS and afk cloak counters, i'm sorry if you felt you were a part of that.
The HIC was in response to you saying there was no counter to someone sitting save in a POS warping away from being in the POS, just showing you there was a counter.
But you don't have an argument, you still can't kill me. As far as a HIC is concerned, not sure just how many hics continue to stop people warping during DT. But if you think you could hold me during the full reinforced period and then pop my ship, then you go for it.
Also I never said or indicated I was a part of the original discussion, I was merely pointing out you were wrong and have no argument other than 'what if'.
Sloppyslug wrote:Because it stops you performing strategic operations. The unknown gives you a massive tactical advantage, Internal spys and scouting is how it should be leaked. Much like in modern warfare, you countinue to develop counters to everything which gives others an advantage over you.
If you have not noticed eve is based on counters upon counters, it is one of the reasons it is so interesting. Why shouldn't I be allowed to perform straegic ops? After all that's one of the reasons the 'Covert Ops' ships were made.
There is a counter to cloaking, but what you are asking for is extra power on top of the already powerful local intel tool. That is not a balanced approach. CCP Zulu.....Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:17:00 -
[26] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:Danika Princip wrote:Sloppyslug wrote:Mag's wrote: Actually you posted ideas that nerfs cloaking.
Yes in Null Sec where you would expect someone to be able to have full control over their own system. There needs to be a counter, with my idea it would be a massivly expensive counter, which would take time and effort, and be a risk to the titan also. Would limit the ships use also, to being one niche. A counter to what exactly? A counter to your own cowardice? A counter to someone who isn't actually doing anything to anyone? Why, exactly, is it a bad thing for me to be able to cloak up in your system and go afk, but a good thing for you to be able to dock or POS up and go afk? We're both as invulnerable as the other, and we both have the same effect on eachother's gameplay, IE we're a name in local that you can't find. That's it. Neither of us can do anything to the other without losing our invulnerability. What you talking about lol? I just remove anti-cyno, and then drop a super cap fleet on that pos and take it down, then kill you. how do i uncloak you and kill you?
So, you bring in a large subcap fleet, then a large supercap fleet, and you still get to wait a day? Yeah, that's a wonderful counter right there.
How about a 23.5 hour cycle timer on cloaks? That's as effective a counter to AFK cloaking as the one you just gave to hiding in a POS is :) |

Sloppyslug
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:24:00 -
[27] - Quote
So little faith in POS bashing :) |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:37:00 -
[28] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:So little faith in POS bashing :) Nah, it's more of an understanding of game mechanics tbh.
CCP Zulu.....Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Sloppyslug
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:51:00 -
[29] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Sloppyslug wrote:So little faith in POS bashing :) Nah, it's more of an understanding of game mechanics tbh.
Just lol, your thought of its as impossible to take down a POS as it is to find a cloaked frig in billions M^3 space. But ofc you will know so much better than me that there is no counter to POS', just as random SP cloaked frigs. |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:53:00 -
[30] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:Mag's wrote:Sloppyslug wrote:So little faith in POS bashing :) Nah, it's more of an understanding of game mechanics tbh. Just lol, your thought of its as impossible to take down a POS as it is to find a cloaked frig in billions M^3 space. But ofc you will know so much better than me that there is no counter to POS', just as random SP cloaked frigs.
It is impossible for me, as a random solo red in your system, to take down a POS you are hiding in, or a station you are hiding in, just as it is impossible for you to find me if I cloak up.
Sure, it's possible to kill a POS, but not instantly. You'll be coming back tomorrow if it's stronted. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |