This just in:
Having faction police shoot at you everywhere and being KOS to every single player in highsec doesn't count as a consequence.

Why would Concord allow an outlaw into hisec at all? You want to come in, go kill a bunch of of stuff for us first to prove we can trust you.

Besides what is wrong with ratting?

Because Concord is not protecting you. It's not there to protect you. It never was.

Concord's only job is to ensure, that capsuleers loose their ships after failing to comply to Concord regulations.

Do people think the guarantee of ship loss for ganking has no protective effect whatsoever?

Well guys, we've had plenty of hisec bear tears and even more null sec bear tears so It's only right we all get some juicy pirate tears to clogg the forums for a while.

Totally agree with the OP.

Lock da biatches out of Hi sec.

I actually, I'm game for locking null bears out too tbh.

I approve of this idea.
And to simplify traffic control can move the person to the appropriate security the next time they log in.

Besides what is wrong with ratting?
You make ISK while doing it and unless you get stuck in one system (to which I will say plan better and bla blah I'll take all your stuff, yes), you can get your sec status back in 2 days of minor work or a few hours if serious.
Also dont you guys already work primarily in .5 sec, go after even fewer targets due to buffs and now global flags, and bump now because you cant find something better to make people rage over for 17.50 a month?
Like getting really good at a COD game and listen to the sweet sweet vulgar tears of those you crush?

This thread is exactly what I mean when I refer to carebear vs. industrialist mentality.

Industrialist looks at problem, suicide gankers. Industrialist goes "How can I solve this problem, or better yet, exploit it for my own good?" Industrialist stays ATK, pays attention to local, warps off when a scout cuddles up to him....and builds replacement ships for the gankers and other miners to buy.


The carebear looks at the problem and goes "How can CCP fix this problem for me so I don't have to think?" We then get ideas like "Prohibit outlaws from using highsec jump gates because ~consequences~."


Please, can we have less carebears, and more industrialists?

The carebear looks at the problem and goes "How can CCP fix this problem for me so I don't have to think?" We then get ideas like "Prohibit outlaws from using highsec jump gates because ~consequences~."

OP has an excellent idea.

And to expand on this, high-sec missions should be limited to characters younger than 2 months and high-sec belts are all behind an acceleration gate with a frigate size limit.

Obviously, no pirate faction, deadspace or officer items would be allowed in hi-sec either.

The idea is good, as long as criminals has other ways to get into and move in (hisec) systems (smugglers gates or something).

Well.... T2 items might be allowed, but of coursed they'd have to be licensed, registered and, naturally because we're being realistic in this thread, heavily taxed.

but without carebears, suicide gankers would be unemployed.

PLEASE, THINK ABOUT THE GANKERS!