Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Aribeth Fireeye
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 18:08:00 -
[91] - Quote
Jimmy Morane wrote:[quote=Aribeth Fireeye] Oh well, isk lost is a lesson learned. Hopefully I can find a corp that will finance my losses.[/quote
Do you also have an amazon wishlist perchance?
You make it sound like it was a lot of money I lost, I lost chips to most people. A new BS would suffice to cover the losses. |

Mytai Gengod
Sebees
32
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 18:16:00 -
[92] - Quote
Frankly, this and other threads won't stop this from happening again and again and again. I wish they would address it since it relies on inconsistencies in the mechanics but it's no sweat off my back if they don't.
While I've not fallen for this, the fact is new players are repeatedly told that there is isk to be made with ttrading, arbitrage and hauling. Most players who have even a slight interest in trading will at least consider someone's margin trading bait.
Some will research well enough to realize that there is a skill that allows you to screw other players by posting a buy you never ever intended on filling.
But it's allowed. At this point, have to assume it is encouraged. So players who have fallen for this or were about to: consider the fact that this mechanic is still in game after this amount of time as a green light to use this to screw new subscribers to get back your isk.
|

Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
517
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 18:32:00 -
[93] - Quote
The only way they could of made it different is to let the market fish isk out of your wallet if a sales overpassing the limit you already have set away in escrow can't cover the buy. It could neg-wallet some people for some time but they should technically have assets to cover for that with what they just bought.
In the end tho, the rules are the same for everyone so we only have to learn it and deal with it. |

RomeStar
Empire Investments Logistics
201
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 20:48:00 -
[94] - Quote
Aribeth Fireeye wrote:Jimmy Morane wrote:[quote=Aribeth Fireeye] Oh well, isk lost is a lesson learned. Hopefully I can find a corp that will finance my losses.[/quote
Do you also have an amazon wishlist perchance? You make it sound like it was a lot of money I lost, I lost chips to most people. A new BS would suffice to cover the losses.
He was calling you Mintchip she has a wish list on amazon its full of pink dildos. Signatured removed, CCP Phantom |

Anti-social Tendencies
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 21:17:00 -
[95] - Quote
Tub Chil wrote:didn't read the wall of text but margin trading is a flawed feature and needs to go.
Hardly. Margin trading is a great skill to train that benefits the traders in Eve. Sure there are players that use that skill to create scams but they really are easy to spot.
Using your argument we should get rid of the thermodynamics skill because it makes suicide ganking so much easier. Or get rid of the contracting skill because players can use contracts to scam other players. Or not allow corpmates to shoot each other without Concord intervention because there are some players that use that mechanic to get cheap Corp kills on unsuspecting corp members.
Eve is harsh and not for the inattentive or stupid. "Patience: n, a minor form of despair, disguised as a virtue." - AMBROSE PIERCE |

Anti-social Tendencies
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 21:34:00 -
[96] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:I still don't like that mechanic. The skill is there for no reason but to scam and all margin scams are not that obvious. They can be pretty subtle and for a new player, impossible to catch. They have enough on their plate just trying to learn the basics. Expecting them to understand advanced trading is simply pushing it. There really should be something in the tutorial about it. Mr Epeen 
If you truly believe that there is no purpose to the margin trading skill but to scam, then you truly ignorant of a whole portionof Eve economics. I have a trade character that will often have a a couple hundred outstanding buy orders at any one time. They are legit orders which are always covered . I make ISK and sellers are able to sell their goods at what they consider a goo price. As CCP would say... Working as intended.
"Patience: n, a minor form of despair, disguised as a virtue." - AMBROSE PIERCE |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
88
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 21:45:00 -
[97] - Quote
Anti-social Tendencies wrote:Eve is harsh and not for the inattentive or stupid. Except in case of the margin trading game mechanic you don't have to be inattentive or stupid or even greedy to not know that buy orders aren't guaranteed. Contracts are guaranteed and so are sell orders, it's in no way intuitive or obvious that buy orders are not.
I don't like this particular game mechanic even though I generally don't mind scams. It could be fixed rather easily without disrupting the regular use of the margin trading skill by checking if all individual buy orders are covered and cancelling the ones that aren't whenever your wallet and/or escrow changes. |

Elliavir
Kid's Logistics Inc League of Infamy
38
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 22:03:00 -
[98] - Quote
Portia Venetia wrote:Generally I agree with the sentiment that most scams in EVE are "legitimate" and every buyer should beware. The Margin Trading scam is the only one that I feel is unbalanced far in favor of the perpetrator over the mark, and that the fault lies mostly with CCP.
First and foremost, as has been mentioned here, this scam is perpetrated in what is supposedly a broker-operated commodity marketplace. The impression is given, particularly to the new player, that the market may not offer the best "deals" but is a forum for open and transparent transactions, unlike the wild and woolier contracts or direct trades.
Building on that point, many people likely approach EVE with some working knowledge of trading on commodities/securities markets. But as just about anyone here knows at this point, there is a distinct and profound disconnect between what "Margin Trading" is in EVE versus the traditionally accepted definition of that activity in any other market. Buying on margin is a well established practice in RL markets, and at least in every trading system I've ever seen has this in common: a buy order that is filled will be completed. It will always be the buyer and not the seller that is on the hook for a margin call.
EVE, of course, works completely in reverse. When the margin is called and the buyer comes up short, the seller is left holding the bag (of unsaleable goods).
I would personally like to see "Margin Trading" in EVE aligned with what trading on margin actually is; if you overreach with a buy order and it is filled, then tough luck Charlie you now owe a pile of money to the brokerage. This however will result in negative wallet balances which everyone screams is "completely unfair."
At the very least, it would be nice that "unbacked" buy orders (those buy orders that cannot be completely filled) were highlighted in red text in the market; it would give a clear indication that something was up instead of the (relatively) invisible nature of this scam now.
I agree that it would be great to be able to tell the difference between buy orders that are fully funded and ready to complete right now, and those that are not. I've had perfectly boring transactions at very standard market prices run into the "wait! let us set up a sell order for you because that guy ran out of money!" from the ever-helpful brokers, and it's just effing annoying.
I'd rather see the margin trading risk switched over to the buyer, also... but making underfunded orders visible would be a step in the right direction for market clarity. |

Elliavir
Kid's Logistics Inc League of Infamy
38
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 22:13:00 -
[99] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:CCP could destroy margin trading scams in one day with just a few lines of code... if they wanted to.
How? You know how when people get busted cheating CCP will knock their ISK account into the negative and force them to work their way back out of the hole?
Allow the same thing to happen when people don't actually have the ISK to cover a margin trade. Their ISK balance is now negative. Have fun getting out of the hole. Oh, and you biomass your toon then the bill gets passed to the next one on the account.
Problem solved. Very easy. If they wanted to.
Sad reality, though, they don't want to. Welcome to Sociopaths Online.
The potential for abuse of this is HUGE. You could essentially create free ISK by "selling" overpriced crap to an alt account with an underfunded buy order. And then just let that alt account languish in the negative forever.
I'd still like to see some way to transfer the risk to the person placing the buy order, but preferably without opening up a huge scam potential and without hurting the legitimate traders who use the skill to manage their businesses.
|

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
89
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 07:26:00 -
[100] - Quote
Portia Venetia wrote:Generally I agree with the sentiment that most scams in EVE are "legitimate" and every buyer should beware. The Margin Trading scam is the only one that I feel is unbalanced far in favor of the perpetrator over the mark, and that the fault lies mostly with CCP.
First and foremost, as has been mentioned here, this scam is perpetrated in what is supposedly a broker-operated commodity marketplace. The impression is given, particularly to the new player, that the market may not offer the best "deals" but is a forum for open and transparent transactions, unlike the wild and woolier contracts or direct trades. Agreed, except for the thing about contracts. Contracts actually are very open and transparent; unlike the market with its margin trading buy orders contracts do exactly what they say.
Quote:I would personally like to see "Margin Trading" in EVE aligned with what trading on margin actually is; if you overreach with a buy order and it is filled, then tough luck Charlie you now owe a pile of money to the brokerage. This however will result in negative wallet balances which everyone screams is "completely unfair." The main problem with this solution is not that it is unfair, but that it is an exploitable ISK faucet. This creates far more problems than it solves because you can't ensure that a character with negative wallet balance ever pays back his debt to the economy.
Quote:At the very least, it would be nice that "unbacked" buy orders (those buy orders that cannot be completely filled) were highlighted in red text in the market; it would give a clear indication that something was up instead of the (relatively) invisible nature of this scam now. That would work, though I think just removing those unbacked orders is the simpler solution.
|

Bloody Wench
597
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 08:13:00 -
[101] - Quote
Hey you realise that they have to pay market & broker fees right?
Tens of millions in fees just to double that billion ISK in 1 of many trades....every day or 2.
Not fair I tell you.
Not fair at all.
I should get my fees back when an order fails. Support a High Resolution Texture Pack |

destiny2
Abh Academy Abh Alliance
146
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 08:33:00 -
[102] - Quote
best tip in the whole world if your in a market hub jita,rens,amarr, and whatever the gallante one is. never ever ever trust contracts in local. 90% of them are scams. always make sure you check the contracts, what the it has the price the whole shebang,
check market prices the works.
Or better yet just close local. |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
2188
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 08:35:00 -
[103] - Quote
Impressive thread necromancy. Allow me to be frank. You will not like me. You will not like me now, and you will not like men++ a good deal less as we go on. |

voetius
L V B Industries STELLAR CONSTELLATION
52
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 08:35:00 -
[104] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Jonathon Oday wrote:New player, one month total time in game, having a blast roaming around, mining, missions, etc, etc
Then, through my own naivety and greed, I fall for the Margin Trading Scam...
What little I'd accumulated, all gone. Cleaned out.
Yeah, yeah boo-frikity-hoo, I got what I deserved, right?
Then again... was I wrong to believe that a buy order on the independently administered market place would have enough ISK to cover it? It was nativity and greed. Scams are a part of the game and you need to accept that fact. This scam and the skill should not be changed for one simple reason. You need to buy the over priced item first, before even attempting to sell it. The fact that you didn't do your home work and took the buy order as a legitimate price check, was not the fault of the skill. It was your fault. If you want to speculate in the market, you need a certain amount of knowledge. If you go ahead and make an investment without researching for information first, then you only have yourself to blame.TL:DR. Don't blame this skill, for your poor judgement and investments.
Underlined the important bit OP.
You can avoid margin trade scams by understanding the "true" price of items. Look at market history, go back several months, you can see average figures. Compare one or more regions prices. If the buy price is substantially higher you need to ask yourself if this is a patch speculation price hike or a margin scam.
If the buy prices are consistent over several regions and you know it's an item affected by a recent patch like ice prioducts or battleships - or something people may be speculating on such as T1 Industrials due to the forthcoming patch - you have enough information to make a reasoned decision.
You can also use eve-central for price checking across all regions, although it is not guaranteed to be timely, but for high volume items it's generally gives a good idea of prices.
Also, given you said you are a month old player, how could you have lost a large sum of isk? |

Black Dranzer
322
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 09:35:00 -
[105] - Quote
What makes margin trading a unique scam is that it stems not from misplaced trust in a player, as most scams do, but rather from misplaced trust in CCP. A player has no reason to suspect that the game's developers would allow invalid buy orders to be placed on the market.
I was fortunate (smart?) enough to be suspicious when I saw a surprisingly good buy/sell order on the market. But I had no way of verifying the legitimacy of that order. To this day, I don't know if it was a scam. It almost certainly was. But I had no way of verifying. It wasn't a question of risk. I did not know, and I could not know. In any other game, a buy order behaving in this way would be classified as a bug.
But HURR DURR MUH HARDCORE, so in spite of the implementation bordering on the highest grade of idiocy, people will still fight against its removal.
Such is life. Walking in Stations as a Social Hub: Business vs Pleasure in Incarna |

Padraig O'Mahone
Grey Area Protective Services THE H0NEYBADGER
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 02:18:00 -
[106] - Quote
Black Dranzer wrote:What makes margin trading a unique scam is that it stems not from misplaced trust in a player, as most scams do, but rather from misplaced trust in CCP. A player has no reason to suspect that the game's developers would allow invalid buy orders to be placed on the market.
Black Dranzer is absolutely right. Everyone coming down on Jonathon Oday for being greedy or naive, is off base. This was NOT an instance where you'd expect to be tricked by an IN GAME MECHANIC.
I'm not an in game trader, when I see a buy order on the game market system that is set up by CCP, NOT a player, I trust that the system, MANAGED BY CCP, is not going to screw me over. I didn't know that you could put up a buy order in the system, MANAGED BY CCP, without enough escrow to cover it.
Everyone getting all haughty and snickering at Jonathon Oday, is off base. He was a new player, there HAS to be a minimal safe threshold for someone that inexperienced. He was not tricked by another player, he was blindsided by CCP and the system THEY implemented.
This is a game. I know that. Being pissed about something that happens to you in a game has nothing to do with not being able to distinguish reality from fantasy. You know what? I invest REAL money and REAL time to play this game. The "sandbox" concept means it gives freedom to all the PLAYERS to do what they like, not for the devs to find ways to bring you down as well.
Finally, CCP got the concept wrong. I do margin trading in real life, and this is NOT how "margin trading" works. The person placing a buy order on margin doesn't simply get his/her order cancelled, and then get to walk away, while the seller is left holding the bag. The consequences of not meeting youhe risk is NOT to the seller. You all are talking about greed, well guess what, true trading OPPORTUNITIES present themselves from time to time, and people try to make the most of them.
There is no other reason for this skill to even exist in game, other than to allow people to implement this scam. CCP got this one wrong. If I get scammed by another player, I'm ok with that, I expect they're out to get me. I'm not ok with an unknowable, in game mechanic (not being able to verify full escrow coverage), programmed into the game, causing damage and taking me completely by surprised.
This "Tough luck, figure it out" attitude from many of you is off base as well. You keep harping on the fact that this isn't real life, yup, you're right, it's a game, and games have RULES that people get to learn ahead of time. And new people are hardly expected to know all of them, or even most of them right away.
It's not the first broken mechanic in a game, but it's still a broken mechanic. |

Aliste Rosenheim
Shadow Titans Inc
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 02:34:00 -
[107] - Quote
Im confused. So you clicked on a buy order in the market and the person got your items but didn't have to pay you?? |

Jonah Gravenstein
Balius and Xanthus Traditional Gunsmiths
11172
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 03:23:00 -
[108] - Quote
Aliste Rosenheim wrote:Im confused. So you clicked on a buy order in the market and the person got your items but didn't have to pay you?? Not quite, he purchased an overpriced piece of tat (the scam) with the hopes of making a killing on it by selling it to a ridiculously priced buy order (the bait), the buy order failed because the character who placed it didn't have enough ISK. OP is now down some cash and up an expensive piece of tat.
Bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are ~ Harry G. Frankfurt |

MotherSammy
Gespenster Kompanie Villore Accords
35
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 06:50:00 -
[109] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Aliste Rosenheim wrote:Im confused. So you clicked on a buy order in the market and the person got your items but didn't have to pay you?? Not quite, he purchased an overpriced piece of tat (the scam) with the hopes of making a killing on it by selling it to a ridiculously priced buy order (the bait), the buy order failed because the character who placed it didn't have enough ISK. OP is now down some cash and up an expensive piece of tat.
what the flying christ is 'tat' ? |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
5499
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 06:56:00 -
[110] - Quote
MotherSammy wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Aliste Rosenheim wrote:Im confused. So you clicked on a buy order in the market and the person got your items but didn't have to pay you?? Not quite, he purchased an overpriced piece of tat (the scam) with the hopes of making a killing on it by selling it to a ridiculously priced buy order (the bait), the buy order failed because the character who placed it didn't have enough ISK. OP is now down some cash and up an expensive piece of tat. what the flying christ is 'tat' ? Stuff, junk, garbage, trash, useless item. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
15678
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 09:04:00 -
[111] - Quote
Ooh! Double necro!
Padraig O'Mahone wrote:Black Dranzer is absolutely right. Everyone coming down on Jonathon Oday for being greedy or naive, is off base. This was NOT an instance where you'd expect to be tricked by an IN GAME MECHANIC. GǪbut he wasn't tricked by a game mechanic. He was tricked by his own lack of research.
CCP does not manage the market, and buy orders are not promises to buy GÇö they are only offers. Those offers can go away at any time for any number of reasons. The problem never was the buy order, but his decision to buy stuff that weren't worth what he was paying. He would have suffered the same fate if someone else had beaten him to the order, if the order had expired, if the buyer had cancelled the order, or, hell, if the buyer had just adjusted the price.
Quote:Everyone getting all haughty and snickering at Jonathon Oday, is off base. He was a new player, there HAS to be a minimal safe threshold for someone that inexperienced. He was not tricked by another player, he was blindsided by CCP and the system THEY implemented. No. He was just blinded by the dollar-signs in his eyes and invested without knowing the value of his investment or even the basics of how the market works. There can't be any kind of GÇ£safe thresholdGÇ¥ against offers that go away. What do you propose? That the game forces buyers to take stuff that they no longer want?
Quote:There is no other reason for this skill to even exist in game, other than to allow people to implement this scam. The skill isn't even needed for the scam, so you're wrong already there. In addition, the skill has plenty of reason to exist since it lets traders' ISK carry further and be employed more efficiently.
The game already offers everything you need to avoid this kind of mistake, so it's most definitely not CCP's fault that people buy stuff for more than they're worth (because that is the error they make GÇö it has nothing to do with the buy orders people keep complaining about). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3704
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 09:18:00 -
[112] - Quote
Tippia wrote:There can't be any kind of GÇ£safe thresholdGÇ¥ against offers that go away. What do you propose? That the game forces buyers to take stuff that they no longer want?
Sure there can be. For new players at least. New players don't have much money to lose, so their downside risk is very limited. That's the benefit of holding long positions.
Of course, if they borrow money against their future income (i.e. buy plex against the idea that they will no longer pay a sub in the future), that leverage allows them to dramatically increase that risk, but then that's just the nature of leverage.

I'm having an Econ pedantry funtime kick. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

symolan
BamBam Inc.
13
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 09:25:00 -
[113] - Quote
There's no such thing as a free lunch. If it looks too good to be true it probably isn't. Two rules that are true in RL and also in Eve. but you got greedy... |

Marmaduke Hatplate
Abercrombie and Smith
37
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 09:26:00 -
[114] - Quote
I fell for the escrow scam in my second week (not so long ago). I was suspicious of 'too good to be true', but I remember distinctly thinking 'it's a buy order. It's there. I just fill it, I'm good, right?'
At that stage, I'd been warned in Rookie Help not tp trust cobtracts in Jota local etc, but I assumed that since this was through the market it was legit.
I think a stickie on the New Players forum specifically explaining the kibd of scams that exist in Eve would be plenty enough warning to noobs to put all onus on them for falling for scams, but the 'highlight escrow buys not covered' idea is fantastic too. Would that hurt legit margin traders? "Friends and fun...The only 2 really important things in EVE Online." - Crazy Dutch Guy |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
15251
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 09:38:00 -
[115] - Quote
Padraig O'Mahone wrote:Black Dranzer wrote:What makes margin trading a unique scam is that it stems not from misplaced trust in a player, as most scams do, but rather from misplaced trust in CCP. A player has no reason to suspect that the game's developers would allow invalid buy orders to be placed on the market. Black Dranzer is absolutely right. Everyone coming down on Jonathon Oday for being greedy or naive, is off base. This was NOT an instance where you'd expect to be tricked by an IN GAME MECHANIC. I'm not an in game trader, when I see a buy order on the game market system that is set up by CCP, NOT a player, I trust that the system, MANAGED BY CCP, is not going to screw me over. I didn't know that you could put up a buy order in the system, MANAGED BY CCP, without enough escrow to cover it. But he's not right. The problem here is that people did place trust in a player. They placed trust in the buy order pricing and being true value for an item. Then thinking they were going to make lots of quick ISK, trusted a player again when selecting an overpriced sell order.
If you're prepared to invest ISK, without first doing some home work on the market, then you suffer the consequences. Preparation doesn't mean taking the price of a buy order, as a legitimate value. If you do that, you are placing too much trust in a player.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

symolan
BamBam Inc.
13
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 09:55:00 -
[116] - Quote
Marmaduke Hatplate wrote: but the 'highlight escrow buys not covered' idea is fantastic too. Would that hurt legit margin traders?
Yes it would. As the game will have a hard time to decide which one of the orders is the one not covered. So it will finally just show all orders as not completely covered ignoring the fact that for say 80% coverage is actually there. |

Fluffy Sheep
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 22:29:00 -
[117] - Quote
Isn't this fixed as simply as having an indicator on the buy / sell order. One warning whether the dealer actually has at that point in time enough money to cover their end?
Then the buyer actualy has an option to say screw that and move on to a legitimate order?
"warning seller does not have the funds to cover blah blah" or whatever. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
15693
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 22:39:00 -
[118] - Quote
Fluffy Sheep wrote:Isn't this fixed as simply as having an indicator on the buy / sell order. One warning whether the dealer actually has at that point in time enough money to cover their end? Fix what, exactly? Giving people free hints about the skills of other players does not stop them from buying overpriced goods, which is where the GÇ£problemGÇ¥ actually resides. Buy orders being removed for lack of ISK is no different from buy order being removed after being fulfilled by someone else or buy orders being removed because the buyer says so or buy orders being removed because they've expired. None of it is a problem.
And no, constantly polling the wallet of everyone who has an order on the market every time anyone looks at the market breaks more things than it could ever hope to fix. A better solution is for people to learn that buy orders are not promises and are never guaranteed.
Quote:Then the buyer actualy has an option to say screw that and move on to a legitimate order? The seller (because it's the seller we're talking about since margin trading affects buy orders) has no say in the matter. The order will be filled by the one with the best price. If that happens to be someone who's buying on margin, then the seller will sell to that buyer regardless of the seller's opinion on margin trading.
Also, there is functionally no difference between legitimate and GÇ£illegitimateGÇ¥ buy orders, and irrespective of their legitimacy, they can all fail to give the seller the trade he was expecting. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Rhivre
TarNec Invisible Exchequer
341
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 23:15:00 -
[119] - Quote
Here is the thing.....
Say CCP remove margin trading, as it seems some people want.
What is to stop the following happen:
Player A lists a buy order for extremely low volume item at stupid prices. Player A lists sell order for what appears to be a very cheap price for the same rare low volume item 1 jump away.
Player B goes OMG, free isk, runs 1 jump to buy the item
Player A sees the wallet flash, cancels the buy order.
How would the OP be in a situation any different from what they are now?
They are still left holding items they bought at a silly price and now cannot shift. (or, they think they cannot shift) Player A still has the isk from the sell order they placed.
No margin trading skills are required. Player B still sees the order disappear off their market screen, only now, they dont have to fly back to find out, they find out immediately after buying the crappy item.
Alternatively, Player B rushes off to buy items for a legitimate buy order, spends all his isk on it, in the meantime, Player C who has a stockpile of the item, fills the buy order, leaving player B holding a load of stuff again. |

Aliste Rosenheim
Shadow Titans Inc
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 23:26:00 -
[120] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Aliste Rosenheim wrote:Im confused. So you clicked on a buy order in the market and the person got your items but didn't have to pay you?? Not quite, he purchased an overpriced piece of tat (the scam) with the hopes of making a killing on it by selling it to a ridiculously priced buy order (the bait), the buy order failed because the character who placed it didn't have enough ISK. OP is now down some cash and up an expensive piece of tat. Oh ok, so this scam cant affect someone who is legitimately trying to sell an item? It only works on a ridiculous "set up" item? If im trying to sell a billion in tritanium to a buy order the transaction will go thru rite? unless they dont have enough money, in which case i'll get back my trit anyway rite? |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |