Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
stoicfaux
2554
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 16:07:00 -
[31] - Quote
Ivy Romanova wrote: The orbit keeping space magic engine failed and then it free fall down to Caldari Prime.
if not , why would it fall?
Given that wrecks in Eve are stationary (i.e. they carry no momentum even after that 3k m/s interceptor explodes) you don't even need an active station keeping engine.
I don't think you can even bump wrecks into moving.
|
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
4470
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 16:13:00 -
[32] - Quote
Cough* Caldari Prime is very unlike Earth Cough*
|
Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
353
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 16:37:00 -
[33] - Quote
The acceleration toward the planet is most likely wrong because gravity is not as strong on an object 200 km away. |
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
1200
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 16:50:00 -
[34] - Quote
A friend of mine once said "Every business needs a Science Department. I don't care if it's a restaurant, a laundry mat or a bowling ally. There needs to be at least one colossal science nerd there who gets veto power over all management decisions based on their superior knowledge of what is and is not actually physically possible."
Heed this advice, CCP, or you'll keep ending threads like this one until you feel stupid as your own word censor list. Live Events are neither. |
Ivy Romanova
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
831
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 16:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
Apparently , I was VERY misinformed and uninformed when I made this thread!
TO THE CALCULATORS! FFREEDOM!!!!! |
Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Core Federation Black Core Alliance
281
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 16:59:00 -
[36] - Quote
So y'all want some hard sci-fi? Some really realistic stuff?
Truth is all of these things like lasers, railguns, projectile weapons, missile launchers, armor, shields would be completely and utterly pointless to a society capable of light speed and FTL travel.
As soon as a society is capable of attaining light speed travel, a mass traveling at light speed is the be all and end all weapon. AKA a relativistic kill vehicle.
A 1kg mass traveling at C will hit with the impact of 10.75 megatons. To reach the estimated yield of the 65 milion year ago asteroid, a mere 10 million kg (10,000 tonnes) is all that's required.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTzA_xesrL8 |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
4472
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 17:02:00 -
[37] - Quote
Another factor I would like to restate is Air pressure may have impact on the shock wave, however from what I understand usually for the worse (as explosions in real water typically travel much further. Actually this could be a good thing because the energy is the same but not imparting as much along the way) but I am no armageddeonist.
|
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
4472
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 17:03:00 -
[38] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:So y'all want some hard sci-fi? Some really realistic stuff?
Truth is all of these things like lasers, railguns, projectile weapons, missile launchers, armor, shields would be completely and utterly pointless to a society capable of light speed and FTL travel.
As soon as a society is capable of attaining light speed travel, a mass traveling at light speed is the be all and end all weapon. AKA a relativistic kill vehicle.
In the face of that, all these other sci-fi space toys are the equivalent of fighting a modern war with an atlatl and a sling. Or maybe just your fists and teeth.
A 1kg mass traveling at C will hit with the impact of 10.75 megatons. To reach the estimated yield of the 65 milion year ago asteroid, a mere 10 million kg (10,000 tonnes) is all that's required.
/me throws up electronic warfare and watches you miss your shot.
While a planet may have a hard time dodging a starship would have no issue.
|
Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Core Federation Black Core Alliance
281
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 17:10:00 -
[39] - Quote
Good luck even knowing a mass traveling at C is even headed toward your spaceship in the first place. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTzA_xesrL8 |
Ivy Romanova
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
831
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 17:15:00 -
[40] - Quote
hmmm speaking of light speed , here is an interesting thought. Would you even be able to see the projectile before it hits?
The projectile itself is already travelling at 99.99999999999999% C, light can go no faster . So when you see it , it already has hit.
Makes you wonder why did they even invent the railgun or are still using missiles. FFREEDOM!!!!! |
|
Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Core Federation Black Core Alliance
281
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 17:17:00 -
[41] - Quote
Fact of the matter any weapon other than RTKs is pretty pointless to use for a civilization capable of light speed travel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTzA_xesrL8 |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
4472
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 17:21:00 -
[42] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:Imagine several hundred 10 ton projectiles traveling at C that explode like a shrapnel shell a fraction of a second in front of you, breaking into 10,000 one kilogram chunks apiece that continue to also travel at C.
Best of luck even knowing those projectiles are headed in your general direction in the first place, then dodging a few million pieces of 10 megaton speed-of-light space buckshot.
See that is the fun thing about electronic warfare, I already know you're trying to shoot me before you even fired. My hopes is your computer shoots the completely wrong thing. Or even better, how do you know you are about to hit is friendly? IFF singals havent confirmed yet and the return on the sensors isn't all that good of a resolution lighthours out of range.
|
Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Core Federation Black Core Alliance
281
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 17:24:00 -
[43] - Quote
You wouldn't know another starship traveling at C is there until it came to a stop right in front of you.
Likewise with the ammunition it accelerates at you.
The fun thing is, you cannot have information until it reaches you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTzA_xesrL8 |
Jarod Leercap
On Three 125
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 18:14:00 -
[44] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:You wouldn't know another starship traveling at C is there until it came to a stop right in front of you.
Likewise with the ammunition it accelerates at you.
Quote:Just as the spaceship decelerates from C, it lets loose its payload that continues to travel at C while the spaceship decelerates to sublight speeds.
While EVE features FTL travel, to size up the universe you need to realize that it features nothing moving through space at anything approaching the speed of light.
EVE features two forms of FTL travel: warping and jumping. Neither involves matter accelerating to or beyond the speed of light. "Warp", as proposed in EVE and several other sci-fi worlds, involves isolating a bubble of space-time around an object and then moving that space-time somewhere else. General Relativity does not impose any speed limits on space, so on this face of it, this seems to be "allowed". However, it is important to understand that the ship itself actually remains stationary in its space-tie "bubble".
Jumping is a different mechanism in EVE and other sci-fi worlds, but it also does not require matter to move through space at non-relativistic speeds. In a nutshell, "jumping" involves connecting two remote parts of space-time together directly. This provides a short cut between those two points, and you can traverse between them at normal speeds and spend less time doing so than light would require to traverse them via another route. This also seems to be allowed by General Relativity, where space is non-Euclidean and the shortest difference between two points is not necessarily a straight line.
That said, scientists are skeptical that either mode of transportation is technically possible. Both ideas, on their face, offer up sufficient paradoxes or such ridiculous energies as to render them either impossible, impractical, or both. But, it's just a game. ;)
With respect to the titan: If it was blown up from geostationary orbit, some of the mass would be accelerated to escape velocity, while some would be directed into a decaying orbit. You'd have some portions that would never hit the planet, some that would hit the planet soon, and some that would hit the planet later.
A lot would depend on the force of the explosion and how the titan was flung apart. |
Cyprus Black
The Learning Curve.
714
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 18:16:00 -
[45] - Quote
I have a middle school education on math and science, plus I watched a few episodes of myth busters and Bill Nye The Science Guy, therefor my opinions are just as valid and in my opinion (without explaining how or why) you are completely wrong.
That's the impression I get from some of these responses in this thread. Trolling is like art. Anyone can finger paint, but it takes true talent to create a masterpiece. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
4472
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 18:38:00 -
[46] - Quote
Cyprus Black wrote:I have a middle school education on math and science, plus I watched a few episodes of myth busters and Bill Nye The Science Guy, therefor my opinions are just as valid and in my opinion (without explaining how or why) you are completely wrong.
That's the impression I get from some of these responses in this thread.
I am no expert, but I was pointing in the direction that needs attention thus helping those who have more tools than I do remember something they may have forgotten. You also forgot to add I read popular science articles.
|
stoicfaux
2554
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 18:39:00 -
[47] - Quote
Since we switched to planet busters, you wouldn't need to bombard a planet with rocks traveling at a significant portion of c. In Eve, anti-matter is mass produced (i.e. AM ammo.) An FTL ship just needs to warp to the planet and start dropping AM bombs/rounds into the atmosphere. This would require much less effort, time, and aiming over kinetic bombardment. |
Nerath Naaris
Pink Winged Unicorns for Peace Love and Anarchy
401
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 19:10:00 -
[48] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:Since we switched to planet busters, you wouldn't need to bombard a planet with rocks traveling at a significant portion of c. In Eve, anti-matter is mass produced (i.e. AM ammo.) An FTL ship just needs to warp to the planet and start dropping AM bombs/rounds into the atmosphere. This would require much less effort, time, and aiming over kinetic bombardment.
Tell that to the humans that decided to get their collective asses handed to them by some blue smurfs on Pandoria because they choose a direct assault over a perfectly safe orbital bombardment. Forum-unbanned since 2011.10.20.
Mangala Solaris for CSM 8 |
Calathorn Virpio
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
25
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 19:21:00 -
[49] - Quote
Xearal wrote:So basicly all the dinosaurs on Caldari Prime will die.
i think this is the best comment out there CCP are the French gate camping=/=PVP everything else is fair game |
Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere
315
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 19:22:00 -
[50] - Quote
I'm going to assume the desperate last efforts of the crew likely significantly reduced its speed as it fell towards the planet. From what we saw in the DUST servers, most of the titan seemed intact, sticking out of the ground at an angle. I'd argue this in itself is proof that the titan didn't impact with the speed and destructive potential you suggest.
This is probably the point to start listing make-believe science thingies likely to be found on make-believe faster-than-light starships, such as inertia dampeners, gravity-wave-fronts and emergency thrusters. Hell, maybe a caldari titan has all three, and even more! No doubt the brave crew used such things to try to save their lives, as well as their beloved planet. Post with your main, like a BOSS! |
|
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
760
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 19:39:00 -
[51] - Quote
Xearal wrote:So basicly all the dinosaurs on Caldari Prime will die.
Along with the Calamari squids Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 Disclaimer: CCP Bias is a fictional character. In case that some CCP Bias does exist,-áis he an ex-goon? |
Cyprus Black
The Learning Curve.
714
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 19:54:00 -
[52] - Quote
You guys are dumb. Caldari Prime is only 6000 years old, as is the rest of the universe. You know this if you read the bible. Also the eve gate was put there to trick people into thinking the universe is older than 6000 years. Trolling is like art. Anyone can finger paint, but it takes true talent to create a masterpiece. |
stoicfaux
2554
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 20:14:00 -
[53] - Quote
Nerath Naaris wrote:stoicfaux wrote:Since we switched to planet busters, you wouldn't need to bombard a planet with rocks traveling at a significant portion of c. In Eve, anti-matter is mass produced (i.e. AM ammo.) An FTL ship just needs to warp to the planet and start dropping AM bombs/rounds into the atmosphere. This would require much less effort, time, and aiming over kinetic bombardment. Tell that to the humans that decided to get their collective asses handed to them by some blue smurfs on Pandoria because they choose a direct assault over a perfectly safe orbital bombardment. Orbital bombardment was vetoed by the PR, Marketing, and Travel departments.
|
Ivy Romanova
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
832
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:25:00 -
[54] - Quote
Jarod Leercap wrote:Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:You wouldn't know another starship traveling at C is there until it came to a stop right in front of you.
Likewise with the ammunition it accelerates at you. Quote:Just as the spaceship decelerates from C, it lets loose its payload that continues to travel at C while the spaceship decelerates to sublight speeds. While EVE features FTL travel, to size up the universe you need to realize that it features nothing moving through space at anything approaching the speed of light. EVE features two forms of FTL travel: warping and jumping. Neither involves matter accelerating to or beyond the speed of light. "Warp", as proposed in EVE and several other sci-fi worlds, involves isolating a bubble of space-time around an object and then moving that space-time somewhere else. General Relativity does not impose any speed limits on space, so on this face of it, this seems to be "allowed". However, it is important to understand that the ship itself actually remains stationary in its space-tie "bubble". Jumping is a different mechanism in EVE and other sci-fi worlds, but it also does not require matter to move through space at non-relativistic speeds. In a nutshell, "jumping" involves connecting two remote parts of space-time together directly. This provides a short cut between those two points, and you can traverse between them at normal speeds and spend less time doing so than light would require to traverse them via another route. This also seems to be allowed by General Relativity, where space is non-Euclidean and the shortest difference between two points is not necessarily a straight line. That said, scientists are skeptical that either mode of transportation is technically possible. Both ideas, on their face, offer up sufficient paradoxes or such ridiculous energies as to render them either impossible, impractical, or both. But, it's just a game. ;)
With respect to the titan: If it was blown up from geostationary orbit, some of the mass would be accelerated to escape velocity, while some would be directed into a decaying orbit. You'd have some portions that would never hit the planet, some that would hit the planet soon, and some that would hit the planet later. A lot would depend on the force of the explosion and how the titan was flung apart.
In other words , we are talking about the famous Einstein Rosen bridge , but if thats their ONLY form of FTL travel , that would reckon the question. How is information instantaneously relayed across the ENTIRE cluster without lag or delay? FFREEDOM!!!!! |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1247
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:41:00 -
[55] - Quote
This assumes that the Titan was knocked completely offline when 'destroyed' of course.
And it's not like Ships in Eve use reaction drives. Remember the Kzinti Lesson. Steve Ronuken for CSM 8 Handy tools and SDE conversions Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Primary This Rifter
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
27
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:08:00 -
[56] - Quote
lol @ assuming the titan's density as a piece of solid metal. Yes, I'm an alt. Congratulations. |
Darth Nenny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:30:00 -
[57] - Quote
OK, just putting my 2 bob's worth here, id use SUVAT equations 2 work this out s = distance (metres, m) u = initial velocity (metres per second, ms^-1) v = final velocity (metres per second, ms^-1) a = acceleration (metres per second squared, ms^-2) t = time (seconds, s) the equations as follows v = u + at s = ut + 1/2at^2 s = vt - 1/2at^2 v^2 = u^2 + 2as s = ((u + v)/2)t
OK, lets make a few assumptions, S= 1,000 k's so its 100,000 m U= 0mps due 2 a standing start, it wasn't falling from the sky, it was flying under power above the planet before we start our equations V= we don't know yet A= we can assume its 10.3mps thanks 2 a previous post if he is correct (i hope he is) T= we don't know how long it took so we will have 2 work it out
S = VT - 1/2AT^2 as we know all but T and V, do the equation to find out V then we can then work out how much force N (newtons) the titan hit the planet at, its easy enough 2 work that out into megajoules or whatever measurement of energy you want to use after that. FYI the reason i haven't done the equation 4 you is due 2 the fact that i cant remember how to do said equation, its been 15 years since i did physics in high school and i really cant work it out.... maybe I've drank 2 much booze since then lol. also there is a equation u can use 2 work out the gravity of both objects and the time it would take for them to come together excluding all other factors, but I'm yet to remember that on so u guys are on ya own from here on.
dam my head hurts now :P good luck
Darth nenny |
Ivy Romanova
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
836
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 06:33:00 -
[58] - Quote
Darth Nenny wrote:OK, just putting my 2 bob's worth here, id use SUVAT equations 2 work this out s = distance (metres, m) u = initial velocity (metres per second, ms^-1) v = final velocity (metres per second, ms^-1) a = acceleration (metres per second squared, ms^-2) t = time (seconds, s) the equations as follows v = u + at s = ut + 1/2at^2 s = vt - 1/2at^2 v^2 = u^2 + 2as s = ((u + v)/2)t
OK, lets make a few assumptions, S= 1,000 k's so its 1,000,000 m U= 0mps due 2 a standing start, it wasn't falling from the sky, it was flying under power above the planet before we start our equations V= we don't know yet A= we can assume its 10.3mps thanks 2 a previous post if he is correct (i hope he is) T= we don't know how long it took so we will have 2 work it out
S = UT - 1/2AT^2 as we know all but T and V, do the equation to find out T then do one of the others 2 work out V then we can then work out how much force N (newtons) the titan hit the planet at, its easy enough 2 work that out into megajoules or whatever measurement of energy you want to use after that. FYI the reason i haven't done the equation 4 you is due 2 the fact that i cant remember how to do said equation, its been 15 years since i did physics in high school and i really cant work it out.... maybe I've drank 2 much booze since then lol. also there is a equation u can use 2 work out the gravity of both objects and the time it would take for them to come together excluding all other factors, but I'm yet to remember that on so u guys are on ya own from here on.
dam my head hurts now :P good luck
Darth nenny
edit 2 fix a small error
AH-HA! I FOUND IT! COMPLETE caldari prime geological and gravitational data : Well.. not really complete , but its a NICE start.
Attributes Planet TypePlanet (Temperate) Density1467990 kg/m-¦ Eccentricity0.014 Escape Velocity12.248 km/s Mass Dust6.445e+24 kg Mass Gas8.734e+24 kg Orbit Period3785.4 days Orbit Radius5.181 AU Pressure21.12 kPa Radius13,503 km Surface Gravity7.618 m/s-¦ Temperature297.00 K
Alright then, the planet mass would then by approximately (Neglecting the Equatorial bulge since I am in a state of Apple CIder induced "cannot be arsed"), but here , if you feel like it . Do it
m-ë2rsin-å=GêÆmg(1/r)(dr/d-å)
r(0)GêÆr(-Ç/2)Gëê[(-ë^2)(r-»^2)]/g-» Kudos to Kepler
planet mass (M) = 2.0816437768816E+25 kilogram GEO orbit radius from surface = 13504.618km If some of ya love integration , you would get a MUCH more accurate result than mine . The following would be slighly overestimating the effects , but meh.
The titan would impact earth at 14343.88176192205 ms-1 (14.3kms^-1) Considering it was a vertical drop , the sphere of debris would be well within that of a small country , so lets say The KE of the impact would be around 249982536960Megajoules = 59.747260267686 megaton of TNT .
Well.. then .. That isn't so bad after all .. If the magical fusion core doesn't explode FFREEDOM!!!!! |
Ivy Romanova
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
836
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 09:03:00 -
[59] - Quote
Darth Nenny wrote:OK, just putting my 2 bob's worth here, id use SUVAT equations 2 work this out s = distance (metres, m) u = initial velocity (metres per second, ms^-1) v = final velocity (metres per second, ms^-1) a = acceleration (metres per second squared, ms^-2) t = time (seconds, s) the equations as follows v = u + at s = ut + 1/2at^2 s = vt - 1/2at^2 v^2 = u^2 + 2as s = ((u + v)/2)t
OK, lets make a few assumptions, S= 1,000 k's so its 1,000,000 m U= 0mps due 2 a standing start, it wasn't falling from the sky, it was flying under power above the planet before we start our equations V= we don't know yet A= we can assume its 10.3mps thanks 2 a previous post if he is correct (i hope he is) T= we don't know how long it took so we will have 2 work it out
S = UT - 1/2AT^2 as we know all but T and V, do the equation to find out T then do one of the others 2 work out V then we can then work out how much force N (newtons) the titan hit the planet at, its easy enough 2 work that out into megajoules or whatever measurement of energy you want to use after that. FYI the reason i haven't done the equation 4 you is due 2 the fact that i cant remember how to do said equation, its been 15 years since i did physics in high school and i really cant work it out.... maybe I've drank 2 much booze since then lol. also there is a equation u can use 2 work out the gravity of both objects and the time it would take for them to come together excluding all other factors, but I'm yet to remember that on so u guys are on ya own from here on.
dam my head hurts now :P good luck
Darth nenny
edit 2 fix a small error
There is a little tool on the Internet called Physics Calculator . Now even the silly and drunk and do it .. well... until Euler starts rubbing his rubber ducky on us I guess
FFREEDOM!!!!! |
Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
71
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 09:58:00 -
[60] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:So y'all want some hard sci-fi? Some really realistic stuff?
Truth is all of these things like lasers, railguns, projectile weapons, missile launchers, armor, shields would be completely and utterly pointless to a society capable of light speed and FTL travel.
As soon as a society is capable of attaining light speed travel, a mass traveling at light speed is the be all and end all weapon. AKA a relativistic kill vehicle.
In the face of that, all these other sci-fi space toys are the equivalent of fighting a modern war with an atlatl and a sling. Or maybe just your fists and teeth.
A 1kg mass traveling at C will hit with the impact of 10.75 megatons. To reach the estimated yield of the 65 milion year ago asteroid, a mere 10 million kg (10,000 tonnes) is all that's required.
Unfortunately nobody in EVE actually travels at the speed of light. There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |