Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Isayeki Ohaya
FlutterMac Shipping
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 14:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
As we all know, there is no real PVP going on in null. However, a donut seems to imply there is an area in the middle where there is conflict, or real PVP, or something going on. However, the middle is hisec, which is even more blue than null. I propose the term "Blue Cookie" to reflect how essentially all of Eve is blue to each other. This accurately reflects how there is no real PVP anymore, and how everyone gets a cookie for playing in the form or SRP from their moon goo. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
1241
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 14:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
0/10
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |

Eve Amada
Lightspeed Enterprises Fidelas Constans
39
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 14:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Isayeki Ohaya wrote:As we all know, there is no real PVP going on in null. However, a donut seems to imply there is an area in the middle where there is conflict, or real PVP, or something going on. However, the middle is hisec, which is even more blue than null. I propose the term "Blue Cookie" to reflect how essentially all of Eve is blue to each other. This accurately reflects how there is no real PVP anymore, and how everyone gets a cookie for playing in the form or SRP from their moon goo.
Wrong!
The middle is where the juicy filling is which is made up of all fat & no good for you.
|

Tom Gerard
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
988
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 14:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
I believe "brown rim" is more appropriate. One of the oldest mission players in EVE designed a chart that explains stat priority in regards to mission running, compared Alpha, DPS, Ship Speed and Sig Radius and scores them. http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m24dbrfuWn1r86ax8o1_1280.jpg |

Pantiy
Corporate Scum Test Friends Please Ignore
56
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 14:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
the whole donut term is well misleading as hell. look at test and or goons killboards. or ours for that matter. if we were all blue there would be no kills right? hate to tell you guys but your bieng trolled on the highest level. we are fighting like mad in null. want some proof? http://dog-net.org/brdoc/?br=http%3A%2F%2Feve-kill.net%2F%3Fa%3Dkill_related%26kll_id%3D16954635&Raiden_=blueÞ_Alliance=blue&WALLTREIPERS_ALLIANCE=blue&Test_Alliance_Please_Ignore=blue&Tribal_Band=blue&Unclaimed_=blue&EntroPraetorian_Aegis=blue&Initiative_Mercenaries=blue&Darkness_of_Despair=red&Insidious_Empire=blue&The_Gurlstas_Associates=blue&Test_Friends_Please_Ignore=blue&Against_ALL_Authorities=red#assign
http://dog-net.org/brdoc/?br=http%3A%2F%2Feve-kill.net%2F%3Fa%3Dkill_related%26kll_id%3D16957678&Test_Alliance_Please_Ignore=blue&Raiden_=blue&Tribal_Band=blue&WALLTREIPERS_ALLIANCE=blue&Unclaimed_=blue&Cha_Ching_PLC=blue&Darkness_of_Despair=red&EntroPraetorian_Aegis=blue&Test_Friends_Please_Ignore=blueÞ_Alliance=blue&Claimed_=blue&Insidious_Empire=blue&Squee_=blue&No_value=red&Against_ALL_Authorities=red&Stain_Empire=red#assign
this is only but a small ammount of what went on yesterday. and we do this 7 days a wekk 23/7
~|~(~-á (~~|~-á-á -á |-á-á (__)-á-á-á |
|

Ager Agemo
Imperial Collective
251
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 14:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
Does that means wormholes are the milk where the cookies crumble ? |

Isayeki Ohaya
FlutterMac Shipping
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 14:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
You guys aren't fighting over anything of value though. There's no sov war going on, no structures being shot. You undock what your SRP will replace for you, if there's any risk you might lose isk, you don't fight. It's not real PVP when it's without consequences.
Wormhole space seems to be the last refuge of PVP in eve. |

Milan Nantucket
New Eden Misfits
16
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:00:00 -
[8] - Quote
Not really... turn on the pvp stuff in your map... red in the center with a blue nap around the edge... looks like a donut. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1731
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:03:00 -
[9] - Quote
Pantiy wrote:the whole donut term is well misleading as hell. look at test and or goons killboards. or ours for that matter. if we were all blue there would be no kills right?..
Its not the pilots that are blue to each other, its the solar systems that are blue. That is; its OK to kill the other pilot, but never ever attack their solar system. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Isayeki Ohaya
FlutterMac Shipping
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:09:00 -
[10] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Pantiy wrote:the whole donut term is well misleading as hell. look at test and or goons killboards. or ours for that matter. if we were all blue there would be no kills right?..
Its not the pilots that are blue to each other, its the solar systems that are blue. That is; its OK to kill the other pilot, but never ever attack their solar system.
Exactly! There is no real PVP going on right now. It's all staged risk free PVP. Hisec has the most kills because it offers the safest PVP, where in null there could be actual risk so the leaders eliminated real pvp altogether to protect their botting empires. |

Isayeki Ohaya
FlutterMac Shipping
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:16:00 -
[11] - Quote
Milan Nantucket wrote:Not really... turn on the pvp stuff in your map... red in the center with all the goodness of nullsecbear alts mining with a blue nap around the edge... looks like a donut.
Most of those ships are lost to rats, there's no real PVP going on |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:19:00 -
[12] - Quote
Pantiy wrote:the whole donut term is well misleading as hell. look at test and or goons killboards. or ours for that matter. if we were all blue there would be no kills right? hate to tell you guys but your bieng trolled on the highest level. we are fighting like mad in null. want some proof?
Yes yes, we know that CFC & HBC aren't blue to each other. That's a concession to keep the PvP rank and file from getting bored and wandering off to play another game, weakening the overall forces available to summon should an actual sov war break out.
The problem is that, like the cold war, a level of Mutually Assured Destruction has been reached that is unacceptable to the leadership on either side, so while you may not be blue, you do have significant NIP's in place that prevent any long term conflict from breaking out.
Unless, of course, one of the major coalitions splinters from within, giving the other a clear and decisive advantage.
I have little doubt that if the CFC suddenly went **** up and split into 15 different smaller alliances all bickering with one another, the HBC would jump on that like a fat kid on cake. And vice versa - leadership would be silly not to. Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. Twitter --á@DeVeldrin |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1520
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
Isayeki Ohaya wrote:As we all know, there is no real PVP going on in null. However, a donut seems to imply there is an area in the middle where there is conflict, or real PVP, or something going on. However, the middle is hisec, which is even more blue than null. I propose the term "Blue Cookie" to reflect how essentially all of Eve is blue to each other. This accurately reflects how there is no real PVP anymore, and how everyone gets a cookie for playing in the form or SRP from their moon goo.
I can't imagine the level of jealousy and angst a person must have to make one look at a situation (like null sec, or pvp in general) and come to such provably incorrect (not to mention trollish) conclusion.
To belive in this "blue food" idiocy, you'd have to think that:
A- Every null sec alliance and colaition is fueld by "moon goo"
And
B- Only sov related PVP is PVP.
The 1st is demonstrably untrue (only 500 Tech moons in the whole game, Alliance get income from lots of sources like rent, levys from member corps etc etc), the 2nd is a crazy rationalization that could only be adopted by someone with an agenda.
The real truth is that, while "Sov" could be better, nothing is terribly wrong with null sec (same with low sec). The problem is that your average gamer is an anti-social, risk averse (omg I can't lose my pixels) nerd. no amount of gerrymandering the game to encourage people out of high sec is going to change that basic fact, therefore even "hardcore" games like EVE online will eventually be overrun by carebears who sit safely in protected space complaining about "Blue" stuff.
|

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
3261
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:29:00 -
[14] - Quote
If you want to know where REAL conflict is happening, just look up recent SBU and TCU kills on eve-kill.net.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Isayeki Ohaya
FlutterMac Shipping
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:29:00 -
[15] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Isayeki Ohaya wrote:As we all know, there is no real PVP going on in null. However, a donut seems to imply there is an area in the middle where there is conflict, or real PVP, or something going on. However, the middle is hisec, which is even more blue than null. I propose the term "Blue Cookie" to reflect how essentially all of Eve is blue to each other. This accurately reflects how there is no real PVP anymore, and how everyone gets a cookie for playing in the form or SRP from their moon goo. I can't imagine the level of jealousy and angst a person must have to make one look at a situation (like null sec, or pvp in general) and come to such provably incorrect (not to mention trollish) conclusion. To belive in this "blue food" idiocy, you'd have to think that: A- Every null sec alliance and colaition is fueld by "moon goo" And B- Only sov related PVP is PVP. The 1st is demonstrably untrue (only 500 Tech moons in the whole game, Alliance get income from lots of sources like rent, levys from member corps etc etc), the 2nd is a crazy rationalization that could only be adopted by someone with an agenda. The real truth is that, while "Sov" could be better, nothing is terribly wrong with null sec (same with low sec). The problem is that your average gamer is an anti-social, risk averse (omg I can't lose my pixels) nerd. no amount of gerrymandering the game to encourage people out of high sec is going to change that basic fact, therefore even "hardcore" games like EVE online will eventually be overrun by carebears who sit safely in protected space complaining about "Blue" stuff.
Just to respond to your points.
A- Every null sec alliance and colaition is fueld by "moon goo"
The two relevant coalitions are. Sure, there are other alliances and coalitions in eve, but they aren't more than a bump in the road to the two tech coalitions. There are also renters as income, but renters are basically the same as tech moons. As long as structures aren't getting shot, they're not at risk.
B- Only sov related PVP is PVP.
No, only PVP where both parties are risking something is real PVP. Fleets shooting other fleets for fun isn't real PVP, all the ships are reimbursed and no one loses anything. Ganking in hisec isn't real PVP, the ganker risks nothing. Hot drops aren't real PVP, the dropper risks nothing, etc. Real PVP involves risk by both sides, which only happens in WH space these days. |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
The real truth is that, while "Sov" could be better, nothing is terribly wrong with null sec (same with low sec).
I'm sorry Jenn, normally I agree with what you say, but this is pretty far off the mark. There are terrible issues with null (I try not to speak too much about low, since I rarely spend any time there) that reach far beyond sov mechanics. The Goons in particular, bless them, continually point out the problems by taking ruthless advantage of them, and CCP just continues to ignore them in favor of fixing the BotM (***** of the Month) because, frankly, fixing null sec is so hard they don't have a clue, in my opinion, of how to do it or even where to start. It's like handing someone a pick and a shovel, pointing at a mountain range full of iron and stone and saying "Build me the Empire State Building."
They've created an 800 pound gorilla of a problem. What they need is a 1000 pound solution, and they just don't have one. Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. Twitter --á@DeVeldrin |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
941
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:35:00 -
[17] - Quote
there is no pvp anymore
i'm right because i don't count anything as pvp |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:38:00 -
[18] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:If you want to know where REAL conflict is happening, just look up recent SBU and TCU kills on eve-kill.net.
The war in the east is good, but it's not nearly enough.
Though maybe "blue doughnut" should be "blue croissant". Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. Twitter --á@DeVeldrin |

Dash Bishop
State War Academy Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:40:00 -
[19] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:Unless, of course, one of the major coalitions splinters from within, giving the other a clear and decisive advantage.
I have little doubt that if the CFC suddenly went **** up and split into 15 different smaller alliances all bickering with one another, the HBC would jump on that like a fat kid on cake. And vice versa - leadership would be silly not to.
Apparently you've been under a rock lately.
HBC is falling apart. Montolio (leader of TEST) has stepped down, some of the corps are fighting over who gets what, and the new leadership is making sweeping changes to try and fix it all. If CFC was really interested in beating HBC out of existence, now would be the perfect time to inflict some serious damage.
Except they're not. Because, yanno, RMT. |

Ersahi Kir
Freelance Mining Company
43
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:46:00 -
[20] - Quote
If it was a donut I would have eaten it by now. |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:57:00 -
[21] - Quote
Dash Bishop wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Unless, of course, one of the major coalitions splinters from within, giving the other a clear and decisive advantage.
I have little doubt that if the CFC suddenly went **** up and split into 15 different smaller alliances all bickering with one another, the HBC would jump on that like a fat kid on cake. And vice versa - leadership would be silly not to. Apparently you've been under a rock lately. HBC is falling apart. Montolio (leader of TEST) has stepped down, some of the corps are fighting over who gets what, and the new leadership is making sweeping changes to try and fix it all. If CFC was really interested in beating HBC out of existence, now would be the perfect time to inflict some serious damage. Except they're not. Because, yanno, RMT.
Except I don't think it is - the right time I mean. As much as the members of the HBC are squabbling like twins made to share the same bedroom for too long, I think they'd unite fairly rapidly when faced with a common enemy. Now, if an actual shooting war breaks out within the HBC, I may revise my stance. Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. Twitter --á@DeVeldrin |

Dash Bishop
State War Academy Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 16:03:00 -
[22] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:Except I don't think it is - the right time I mean. As much as the members of the HBC are squabbling like twins made to share the same bedroom for too long, I think they'd unite fairly rapidly when faced with a common enemy. Now, if an actual shooting war breaks out within the HBC, I may revise my stance.
Valid points.
Either way, it doesn't matter to me. It seems that a lot of players are fascinated by the whole HBC vs CFC thing, like it's some kind of reality tv show. |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 16:06:00 -
[23] - Quote
Dash Bishop wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Except I don't think it is - the right time I mean. As much as the members of the HBC are squabbling like twins made to share the same bedroom for too long, I think they'd unite fairly rapidly when faced with a common enemy. Now, if an actual shooting war breaks out within the HBC, I may revise my stance. Valid points. Either way, it doesn't matter to me. It seems that a lot of players are fascinated by the whole HBC vs CFC thing, like it's some kind of reality tv show.
It's certainly scripted like one. Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. Twitter --á@DeVeldrin |

Xearal
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
545
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 16:07:00 -
[24] - Quote
Dash Bishop wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Except I don't think it is - the right time I mean. As much as the members of the HBC are squabbling like twins made to share the same bedroom for too long, I think they'd unite fairly rapidly when faced with a common enemy. Now, if an actual shooting war breaks out within the HBC, I may revise my stance. Valid points. Either way, it doesn't matter to me. It seems that a lot of players are fascinated by the whole HBC vs CFC thing, like it's some kind of reality tv show.
Eve Reality, Best reality? I was there and all.. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1520
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 16:38:00 -
[25] - Quote
Isayeki Ohaya wrote:
Just to respond to your points.
A- Every null sec alliance and colaition is fueld by "moon goo"
The two relevant coalitions are. Sure, there are other alliances and coalitions in eve, but they aren't more than a bump in the road to the two tech coalitions. There are also renters as income, but renters are basically the same as tech moons. As long as structures aren't getting shot, they're not at risk.
B- Only sov related PVP is PVP.
No, only PVP where both parties are risking something is real PVP. Fleets shooting other fleets for fun isn't real PVP, all the ships are reimbursed and no one loses anything. Ganking in hisec isn't real PVP, the ganker risks nothing. Hot drops aren't real PVP, the dropper risks nothing, etc. Real PVP involves risk by both sides, which only happens in WH space these days.
And this is where you destroy your own argument. By that narrow definition of pvp, there has NEVER been any pvp in EVE except 2 noobs 1v1ing in Rifters with 0 isk in their wallets. When i was in faciton warfare, the FW missions paid so much (even in the beginning) that I could through drake after drake after megathron after megathron at the Squids (Caldari) that I never had to blink. Litterally 1 afternoon of missions kept me in ships for week.
Same as now with high sec incursions funding what null sec pvp i do sometimes participate in.
It doesn't make sense. PVP is "player vs player", not "player vs player for some reason some dude on a forum finds acceptable". Everytime a player blows up another player under any circumstances, that pvp whether you like it or not.
Their is plenty of pvp going on, there's even sov grinding going on. The "2 big coalitions" are noting new, it was the same way back when it was "the universe vs BoB" and Russians+friends Vs the old NC.
|

Shobon Welp
GoonFleet Band of Brothers
74
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 17:41:00 -
[26] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:If you want to know where REAL conflict is happening, just look up recent SBU and TCU kills on eve-kill.net. Shooting inanimate structures is REAL PVP. |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
379
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 17:47:00 -
[27] - Quote
"Everything is true, from a certain point of view." --- That Guy.
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
396
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 18:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
Milan Nantucket wrote:Not really... turn on the pvp stuff in your map... red in the center with all the goodness of nullsecbear alts mining with a blue nap around the edge... looks like a donut.
Someone has taken a bit out of it though, there's a big chunk missing north of the Outer Ring. |

Arronicus
vintas industries Mistakes Were Made.
401
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 18:18:00 -
[29] - Quote
Doughnuts usually have a hollow centre. Boston Creams, Longjohns, and Creampies are just fanciful pastry creations given the name of doughnut based on the style they are cooked in.
Therefore, no, the name is not misleading at all, and actually rather accurate, as the 'blue doughnut' in Eve, forms a 0.0 ring around much of highsec.
0/10. |

Georgina Parmala
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 18:30:00 -
[30] - Quote
Isayeki Ohaya wrote: You guys aren't fighting over anything of value though. There's no sov war going on, no structures being shot. You undock what your SRP will replace for you, if there's any risk you might lose isk, you don't fight. It's not real PVP when it's without consequences.
Wormhole space seems to be the last refuge of PVP in eve.
Riddle me this
Why are cap escalations, paying hundreds of millions in isk per hour, OK. To the tune of welping a dread 5 guardians a Bhaal and 20 shiny T3's being "acceptable losses" on a bad night. Yet moon goo paying for ship replacement is bad. What is it that, in your mind, makes cap escalated loot any different than moon goo.
Why is jumping throway fleets into another wormhole "real pvp", but fighting with throwaway ships in null is "no consequence". Is it because WH corps throw away 30 1bil ships while null throws away 300 100mil ships? Think about that for a minute.
By your logic wormholes are just as bad, they don't evict each other and try to conquer every single W-space system under the flag of their one particular alliance. They are not fighting over anything of value. If anything, null is emulating what is going on in wormholes. Farming ISK to a comfortable level, then throwing it away for the off chance of a gudfite where you win nothing, beyond the memory of a night of good pew pew. A night where you got a fight and didn't get blobbed is a good night.
By your logic every C6 corp should be mass producing dreads right now and trying to take control of every single system their static can possibly connect to. After all, this is what you expect of Null - go conquer neighboring systems to expand the empire. The PvP in W-space is good because they don't do this. They leave opponents to prosper near by. So that they have readily accessible people willing to fight, who can throw away ships in equal number and value.
Why is that an acceptable practice in W-Space, but not in Null? Why do they have to go shoot buildings for days under TiDi to please you?
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |