| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Luc Chastot
Gentleman's Corp
271
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
I really hope drone boats are given something special, something that really makes them feel like drone boats as opposed to "ships with drones", because now everyone and their dog has them. Make it idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
29
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:31:00 -
[32] - Quote
Gonna buy a few hundred thousand stabbers now :)
But I am forced to say regarding to the stabber drones. " WE TOLD YOU!!! WE TOLD you that drones would be needed ;)" !!!! |

Psihius
S-DNK U.C.F. Alliance
27
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:31:00 -
[33] - Quote
That Navy Vexor, my precious! Gotta start to fly that one! |

Randy Wray
Pathfinders. The Marmite Collective
21
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:33:00 -
[34] - Quote
After much effort put into the original attack cruiser thread it feels good to see the stabber finally getting its buffs. |

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
259
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:50:00 -
[35] - Quote
Some of the T1 logistics cruiser could do with being a bit squishier in addition to being easier to impair with Ewar. Especially once you factor in warfare links, some of them can tank nearly as well as the ships they are repairing (Augoror and Exequror both have EHP similar to that of an attack cruiser). |

Kontract Killa
Fenrir's Dogs of War Union 0f Revolution
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:02:00 -
[36] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote: Stabber: +25m3 Dronebay and 25mbit bandwidth
More drone bays for ships again? The drone ships are looking less land less attractive each patch.
I welcome more drone bays. |

Davion Falcon
Those Once Loyal
44
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:14:00 -
[37] - Quote
The new Stabber still has **** damage at range. Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise. Never forgotten, never forgiven. |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
1614
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:15:00 -
[38] - Quote
just for consistency reasons. The description of the omen should say +5% ROF bonus. If you want to keep -5% you would have to call it "weapon cycle time" or something similar. Thats very unintuitive for new players since eve has those things wrong in multiple paces. a eve-style bounty system (done)-á dust boarding parties You fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Warde Guildencrantz
TunDraGon Drunk 'n' Disorderly
667
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:24:00 -
[39] - Quote
The stabber buff is very fitting. |

Sven Viko VIkolander
Newbs Fighting Back
44
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:29:00 -
[40] - Quote
ECM does not really need indirect buffs, unless you plan to re-do it for the expansion. I'd like to see T1 logistics a bit weaker in other ways, not ECM susceptibility. T1 crusiers are also too good against frigates atm IMO. Frigs seemed to get tracked far too easily by any size gun atm which has made the frig -> cruiser gap larger than ever...not exactly a welcome state for newer players. |

Boris Amarr
Viziam Amarr Empire
50
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:11:00 -
[41] - Quote
May be Maller should get more PG to get possibility to fit Heavy Pulse Laser II and 1600 Armor Plate? |

Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
37
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:14:00 -
[42] - Quote
Or you can use 800mm plate... |

Boris Amarr
Viziam Amarr Empire
50
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:17:00 -
[43] - Quote
Maller is to slow. It should have advantage to fit 1600 plate in comparison with Omen. Omen is attack cruiser and 800 plate enough for it. |

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
693
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:28:00 -
[44] - Quote
No plan to make the Maller usable for solo? (Just do what you did with the Navy aug except with 1 gun instead of 2...)
Also with the omen, If you're going to give it a ROF bonus you should increase the cap bonus to compensate.. Its kinda silly to have two bonuses that work against each other. BYDI (Shadow cartel) Recruitment open!
|

Jonas Sukarala
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
43
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:21:00 -
[45] - Quote
if you want the T1 logi to be less proficient i would suggest looking at the 1000% bonus here..... 'Tech3 ships need to be put down, like a rabid dog drooling everywhere in the house, they are out of line' CCP Ytterbium |

Sizeof Void
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
343
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:32:00 -
[46] - Quote
I don't agree with the knee jerk tendency to add drone bays to all ships.
You might as well consider equipping every ship with hardpoints for both turrets and launchers, too. And, you might as well give all ships the same number of slots, same CPU/PG, etc. That would certainly make balancing a lot easier.
Tiericide is one thing; homogeneous ships are another - and bad - thing.
If you want to buff the Stab, then consider doing it some other and more unique way, such as a bit more speed. |

Vladimir Norkoff
Income Redistribution Service
116
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:33:00 -
[47] - Quote
Sizeof Void wrote:I don't agree with the knee jerk tendency to add drone bays to all ships. Perhaps I missed something. I was under the impression the Stabber already had a dronebay and that they were simply increasing it's size and b/w. I was also under the impression that it was the only ship out of the 6 addressed that had it's drone bay altered. I am curious how this constitutes "all ships".
Or perhaps you were merely commenting in general. Which leaves one to wonder why you bothered to do so in this thread.
Or maybe it's somebody else that is having a kneejerk reaction?
|

Sizeof Void
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
343
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:36:00 -
[48] - Quote
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:Sizeof Void wrote:I don't agree with the knee jerk tendency to add drone bays to all ships. Or perhaps you were merely commenting in general. Which leaves one to wonder why you bothered to do so in this thread. Mostly in general, I suppose. Fozzie has added or increased drone bays on quite a few ships during the rebalance. Too many, I think.
But,also specific to the Stabber. I don't see that it needs a drone bay.
And, since this is a Fozzie thread, and it is only 3 pages long (so far), I'm hoping he'll read my comment here before it gets buried. :) |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
34
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:50:00 -
[49] - Quote
Stabber was being made usles exaclty because it lacked drone bay. Its a fast heavy tackler, it need drone bays to deal with the ships that it will face ( mostly frigates).
Stabber had drone bay in the past before the tiercide removed if i remember correclty . Or was only the fleet version...? |

Suyer
Explorer Corps Polarized.
9
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:56:00 -
[50] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:mynnna wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote: We are also giving some moderate improvements to the two lowest performing attack cruisers, the Stabber and Omen.
Those look like some decidedly potent changes. But I'm more interested in the bolded - I'm curious how you're coming up with the "lowest performing"? Couple of ways. The more subjective judgement from flying with them and watching for them on TQ (and following feedback in multiple places) plays a part, but objectively I can say for instance that the number of people getting on killmails with Omens and Stabbers on a daily basis is clustered quite significantly lower than Caracals and Thorax.
Wait.
Wait.
Wait.
So.
The stabber and omen, both of which rely somewhat heavily on TE's are the worst performing? And you're nerfing TE's?
>mfw |

The VC's
Spack Force 5
127
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:02:00 -
[51] - Quote
Michael Harari wrote:Seems pretty good overall, although I think the maller could use a touch more capacitor.
Or maybe lose a turret and get a + 10 damage bonus Harbinger style.
|

Lychton Kondur
Brave Newbies Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:51:00 -
[52] - Quote
Quote:Stabber: Change falloff bonus from the 7.5% per level to the standard 10% per level +25m3 Dronebay and 25mbit bandwidth
Yum...
As a new player who just seated into a Stabber, my one "wish list" item was for drone capability.
Thank you 5eva. |

Akturous
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
89
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:22:00 -
[53] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote: Stabber: Change falloff bonus from the 7.5% per level to the standard 10% per level +25m3 Dronebay and 25mbit bandwidth
YES!!!!
Unfortunately after the TE nerf it along with all falloff kiting ships will be completely in the toilet, since you haven't got the grid to fit arty. Back in the bin I'm afraid. Vote Item Heck One for CSM8 |

Arronicus
vintas industries Mistakes Were Made.
456
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 04:09:00 -
[54] - Quote
Litt Up wrote:This should get Sort Dragon to login, lmao
And does that stabber chage effect the sfi?
No. Changes to a specified ship hull, never effect another ship hull, unless that ship hull is directly linked and the same changes are listed on it. |

Joe D'Trader
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
167
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 04:54:00 -
[55] - Quote
CCP Hates Gallente, and that's why the Amarr are getting all these drones |

DR BiCarbonate
Basgerin Pirate SCUM.
56
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 05:16:00 -
[56] - Quote
Yo gais! We're "fixing" Tracking Enhancers!
We know it will destroy a few ships but we dont care!
We already know the stabber is ****, so now with the TE "fix" we have to "fix" one of the bonuses to make it a little less ****!
Keep up the great work fozzie, high five! |

Alara IonStorm
4808
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 08:50:00 -
[57] - Quote
Akturous wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote: Stabber: Change falloff bonus from the 7.5% per level to the standard 10% per level +25m3 Dronebay and 25mbit bandwidth
YES!!!! Unfortunately after the TE nerf it along with all falloff kiting ships will be completely in the toilet, since you haven't got the grid to fit arty. Back in the bin I'm afraid. They upped the falloff bonus to compensate for the Stabber.
|

Arronicus
vintas industries Mistakes Were Made.
460
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 08:59:00 -
[58] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote: We are also giving some moderate improvements to the two lowest performing attack cruisers, the Stabber and Omen.
Omen: -600,000 Mass
Stabber: Change falloff bonus from the 7.5% per level to the standard 10% per level +25m3 Dronebay and 25mbit bandwidth
Was the omen change a typo, or blaring oversight?
Stabber changes: +25% to falloff bonus (at cruiser 5), + a dronebay, with 5 light drones
Omen changes: -5% to ship mass. Period. Not 5% per level or anything, just 5% mass reduction. |

To mare
Advanced Technology
179
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 09:51:00 -
[59] - Quote
finally the stabber might get some use the falloff change counteract the nerf to TE so nothing really change here but the 25m of drone bay are a godblessin.
the omen get a reduction mass? good my favourite kite ship get faster and even more agile. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
35
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 09:52:00 -
[60] - Quote
Arronicus wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote: We are also giving some moderate improvements to the two lowest performing attack cruisers, the Stabber and Omen.
Omen: -600,000 Mass
Stabber: Change falloff bonus from the 7.5% per level to the standard 10% per level +25m3 Dronebay and 25mbit bandwidth
Was the omen change a typo, or blaring oversight? Stabber changes: +25% to falloff bonus (at cruiser 5), + a dronebay, with 5 light drones Omen changes: -5% to ship mass. Period. Not 5% per level or anything, just 5% mass reduction.
that is not a BONUS. its a plain direct reduction of the base mass. Its simply fact that omen was nto as bad as the stabber therefore it does nto need So much help. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |