Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae Blue Sec
209
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 10:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
Odyssey Patch Speculation
Post your speculations and market mis-directions in this thread. Kugutsumen - My signature insures that my post is always read by an ISD or Dev, does yours? |
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae Blue Sec
209
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 10:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'll start with what I know. Certain Naval Insignia are going to skyrocket as people convert LP to obtain navy faction cruiser blueprints due to the navy faction cruiser buff. The BP's themselves will also skyrocket.
Mis-direction or fact you decide. Kugutsumen - My signature insures that my post is always read by an ISD or Dev, does yours? |
Captain-Jean LucPicard
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 10:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
your predicting what allready happened 5 days ago, mate. sure, might aswell call that "speculation" |
March rabbit
No Name No Pain
595
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 10:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Navy Vexor already skyrocketed (at least in Dodixie). There is no BPC in contracts.... |
Karak Bol
Crepuscular
67
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 10:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
*Looks at his 80 faction logistic cruisers in hangar* no idea... |
Candy Oshea
Techfree Investment Group
279
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 12:58:00 -
[6] - Quote
Quafe and Quafe related products iCandy - Bonds. - I have accidently swallowed some Scrabble tiles, my next **** could spell disaster! iCandy Custom Corp Creation & Corp boosting service |
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
473
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 17:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
im thinking new minerals being hinted at will certainly cause a commotion, if these vague rumors are true. |
enterprisePSI
183
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 18:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
March rabbit wrote: Navy Vexor already skyrocketed (at least in Dodixie).
megusta The tears of the many, outweight the tears of the few. Or the one. enterprise-psi-¬
I made tweet, Y U NO FOLLOW!!! |
Alex Grison
Grison Interstellar
246
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:03:00 -
[9] - Quote
I'm telling you guys. Turbo Encabulators.
Mark my rectangles. |
Duquicita
Correct Apostrophe's
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
Thulium. |
|
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
787
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 23:24:00 -
[11] - Quote
Can I short sale TECH? I speculate that the Discovery /Exploration scanner will allow access to ring mining like sites with moon goo Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 Disclaimer: CCP Bias is a fictional character. In case that some CCP Bias does exist,-áis he an ex-goon? |
Untanas Volmyr
Running with Knives Nexus Fleet
7
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
Sub-etheric multi-channel differential analyzers. Used to navigate interdimensional cross rips. And avoid being protamaticaly shifted into pre-iluvial periods. |
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae Blue Sec
209
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:41:00 -
[13] - Quote
Alex Grison wrote:I'm telling you guys. Turbo Encabulators.
Mark my rectangles.
You're sometimes better going for meta 4 turbo encabulators over the tech II as even though you get less power from the meta 4 it still has less side buffeting in the cynosaural field stabilisation range. How far will the price rise on Turbo Encabulators? No one knows, We however do know this, high sec carebears will still buy them at any price to run level 4''s. Kugutsumen - My signature insures that my post is always read by an ISD or Dev, does yours? |
Alex Grison
Grison Interstellar
250
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 05:09:00 -
[14] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Alex Grison wrote:I'm telling you guys. Turbo Encabulators.
Mark my rectangles. You're sometimes better going for meta 4 turbo encabulators over the tech II as even though you get less power from the meta 4 it still has less side buffeting in the cynosaural field stabilisation range. How far will the price rise on Turbo Encabulators? No one knows, We however do know this, high sec carebears will still buy them at any price to run level 4''s.
Dont forget the encab-stabs |
Arronicus
Shadows of Vorlon The Marmite Collective
467
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 06:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:I'll start with what I THINK. Hurf durf bunch of speculations. Mis-direction or fact you decide.
100MN afterburner prices changing significantly? Not likely. Demand wont be that high, as many people will still go with 10mn MWD fits due to poor acceleration and horrible agility on 100mn afterburner fits.
What will likely happen? People will speculative-buy like they are now. Faction cruiser prices will shoot up. Tag prices will shoot up. Faction 100mn AB prices will shoot up. Battleship prices will shoot up.
Then, due to a lack of demand, and a ton of people all trying to sell their product at greatly exaggerated prices, prices will fall back down. In some cases, like the Navy Osprey, prices will remain a fair bit higher than they were, given the massive boost the ship got. In other cases, where the ship got nerfed into something not worth using (Navy Caracal), prices will probably end up even lower than they were before. Tag prices will overall end up back where they were. Navy vexor I expect will go up the most initially, out of the faction cruisers, then drop back down to where it was. The extra drone, and drone speed/tracking buff doesn't compensate for the lost blaster damage buff. |
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
475
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 21:17:00 -
[16] - Quote
This topic doesn't get serious without the sacred -20B Ceremony |
Bling BlingBling
Nihilism.
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:55:00 -
[17] - Quote
Succubi & Phantasms. Guaranteed Pirate Cruisers are next up on the re balance schedule. |
Alex Grison
Grison Interstellar
252
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 23:17:00 -
[18] - Quote
Bling BlingBling wrote:Succubi & Phantasms. Guaranteed Pirate Cruisers are next up on the re balance schedule.
phantasm = phantastic orgasm?
ITS A BUY EVERYONE.
PHANTASMS SUMMER 2013 HERE WE COME. |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
769
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 01:07:00 -
[19] - Quote
I sunk 125b into patch speculation already.
The target has yet to be mentioned in the thread. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
Callduron
190
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 02:09:00 -
[20] - Quote
mynnna wrote:I sunk 125b into patch speculation already. The target has yet to be mentioned in the thread.
Think I can guess.
Hint: it's a type of ship. |
|
Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
31
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 02:24:00 -
[21] - Quote
would like pledge 20b
|
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
770
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 02:25:00 -
[22] - Quote
Callduron wrote:mynnna wrote:I sunk 125b into patch speculation already. The target has yet to be mentioned in the thread. Think I can guess. Hint: it's a type of ship.
Nope! Mynnna for CSM 8 |
Degren
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2366
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 03:44:00 -
[23] - Quote
Sisters scanning equipment short term.
POS fuels and POS mods...though I wouldn't enter it. No clue what their ideas are, but I'm guessing more people will want POSes and I'm guessing a lot of moons are getting switched around. Hello, hello again. |
Mercur Fighter
Oberon Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 03:52:00 -
[24] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Callduron wrote:mynnna wrote:I sunk 125b into patch speculation already. The target has yet to be mentioned in the thread. Think I can guess. Hint: it's a type of ship. Nope!
Guidance System????? |
Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
531
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 20:50:00 -
[25] - Quote
Mercur Fighter wrote:mynnna wrote:Callduron wrote:mynnna wrote:I sunk 125b into patch speculation already. The target has yet to be mentioned in the thread. Think I can guess. Hint: it's a type of ship. Nope! Guidance System????? Buying up all the cheap tracking enhancers as the nerf will not hurt them near as much as expected.
Seems many players are trying to offload them while players still want them. |
sci0gon
Tech X Blue Print Creations Superior Eve Engineering
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 21:07:00 -
[26] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:im thinking new minerals being hinted at will certainly cause a commotion, if these vague rumors are true. idk if this will happen tbh, if anything there may be changes to the belts based on system levels like for example you may get something like jaspet in 0.5 systems, its just speculation though so don't quote me on it. |
OllieNorth
Recidivists Incorporated
226
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 04:28:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:would like pledge 20b
GRAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Jerry's 20b pledge has summoned me from my grave. Look upon your end, MD, and despair!
Or, more accurately, I got bored of not EvE and am back. Hey all!
[a spec/manip/Jerry pledge thread seemed an appropriate place to say hi again] |
Fergus Runkle
Truth and Reconciliation Council
20
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 10:56:00 -
[28] - Quote
Organic Mortar Applications
and
Self-harmonizing Power Cores
for all those personal hangar arrays that will be built. |
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
479
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 22:11:00 -
[29] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Callduron wrote:mynnna wrote:I sunk 125b into patch speculation already. The target has yet to be mentioned in the thread. Think I can guess. Hint: it's a type of ship. Nope!
Knowing your trading habits just a little bit, im going to say its a type of processed moon goo... Id like to go into detail but, I admit to have dabbled a bit of my liquid ISK a few types myself. |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
165
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 22:41:00 -
[30] - Quote
How about virtue implants, sister's probe launchers and probes? |
|
Halvan Zan
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 22:47:00 -
[31] - Quote
What impact will Dust 514 have on the markets.. their expansion in May will bring in clone creation on their planets, and the winners will process the 'biomass' from the losing team. Will biomass Eve-side play into the clone creation?
It is also set up to increase (by a large margin) the number of orbital strikes allowed. Orbital ammo?
When the region is announced this will take place within, things will get interesting there in a hurry. The large alliances from null sec have large alliances within Dust already - I suspect there may be a little more action in those systems will get pretty interesting and trade will spike. |
Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
414
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 22:12:00 -
[32] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Callduron wrote:mynnna wrote:I sunk 125b into patch speculation already. The target has yet to be mentioned in the thread. Think I can guess. Hint: it's a type of ship. Nope!
Amongst other items of note, there was that certain BUY order in Jita for about 8-9 days involving a very generous price for at least 5 million units of a certain material.
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
105
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 22:25:00 -
[33] - Quote
Well if its only speculation..
The tech pooh is sort of obvious, and already mentioned.
I might want to get rid of some PI materials to, since I might suspect they could go and surprise us with a bit of tweaks on that one..
From some of the remarks from CSM members I think some very unexpected things could be entering. usually flashy does not make most CSM types very excited, and they sounded pretty excited..
SOV tweak maybe? New access to Jove or some new space is already dropped as a speculation..
I listened to a roundtable podcast over at lost in EVE http://www.lostineve.net/..
They seemed to be talking quite a bit about economy more than I recall hearing before, especially as a connection to null.. So some taxing system maybe, and reduction of direct dependence on null resources?
I suspect they may be bringing out economy and pricing as a solution to many issues in this one, so everything could be up in the air.. Since ccp seem to want to reduce isk faucets and strengthen sinks. I think I would like to hold liquid isk rather than put money in anything.. The volatility that follows should be ripe for surfing and thus needing isk mainly..
DUST integration does make me interested in vehicles and arms, that I would suspect would move from npc to players at some coming point... if not in current shape, maybe as materials for production for DUST?
Just a few thoughts..
|
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
797
|
Posted - 2013.04.07 04:16:00 -
[34] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:mynnna wrote:Callduron wrote:mynnna wrote:I sunk 125b into patch speculation already. The target has yet to be mentioned in the thread. Think I can guess. Hint: it's a type of ship. Nope! Amongst other items of note, there was that certain BUY order in Jita for about 8-9 days involving a very generous price for at least 5 million units of a certain material.
You could not have made this post more vague. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
414
|
Posted - 2013.04.07 11:06:00 -
[35] - Quote
I was speaking of Contiesta's order for Tungsten Carbide armor plate -- nice little money maker for a few days.
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |
GreenSeed
259
|
Posted - 2013.04.07 23:41:00 -
[36] - Quote
posting to state the obvious.
anyone who didn't buy mountains of navy and pirate ships as soon as the first wave of t1 re balances was done over a year ago should not post in this forum ever again. the time to buy was in the last 2 gallente cashouts before the fw nerf... the way things are going now im expecting at least a 800% return in investment
any advice to buy navy ships, bpcs, or tags is completely moot now.... people have been doing it for over a year. im myself sitting on a few thousand navy ships, well over 2k navy vexors, and yeah i over did it there... but the fw people were using them as throwaway ships... i couldn't help it. all i did was set up buy orders in lowsec hubs and i moved my crap when a system was in lockdown, even safer than buying in highsec.
this is my first massive scale investment and im sure some treasurer from a certain lolsec alliance will claim he has over done me a thousand times over... but i don't care. :D
i mean seriously, if you didn't see it coming years ago, you should go back to that other game whose name we don't mention. |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
798
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 00:52:00 -
[37] - Quote
GreenSeed wrote:posting to state the obvious.
anyone who didn't buy mountains of navy and pirate ships as soon as the first wave of t1 re balances was done over a year ago should not post in this forum ever again. the time to buy was in the last 2 gallente cashouts before the fw nerf... the way things are going now im expecting at least a 800% return in investment
any advice to buy navy ships, bpcs, or tags is completely moot now.... people have been doing it for over a year. im myself sitting on a few thousand navy ships, well over 2k navy vexors, and yeah i over did it there... but the fw people were using them as throwaway ships... i couldn't help it. all i did was set up buy orders in lowsec hubs and i moved my crap when a system was in lockdown, even safer than buying in highsec.
this is my first massive scale investment and im sure some treasurer from a certain lolsec alliance will claim he has over done me a thousand times over... but i don't care. :D
i mean seriously, if you didn't see it coming years ago, you should go back to that other game whose name we don't mention.
Good work Mynnna for CSM 8 |
Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
919
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 12:43:00 -
[38] - Quote
GreenSeed wrote:posting to state the obvious.
anyone who didn't buy mountains of navy and pirate ships as soon as the first wave of t1 re balances was done over a year ago should not post in this forum ever again. the time to buy was in the last 2 gallente cashouts before the fw nerf... the way things are going now im expecting at least a 800% return in investment
any advice to buy navy ships, bpcs, or tags is completely moot now.... people have been doing it for over a year. im myself sitting on a few thousand navy ships, well over 2k navy vexors, and yeah i over did it there... but the fw people were using them as throwaway ships... i couldn't help it. all i did was set up buy orders in lowsec hubs and i moved my crap when a system was in lockdown, even safer than buying in highsec.
this is my first massive scale investment and im sure some treasurer from a certain lolsec alliance will claim he has over done me a thousand times over... but i don't care. :D
i mean seriously, if you didn't see it coming years ago, you should go back to that other game whose name we don't mention. confirming that having high stack counts in your ship hangars will likely pay off in the not so far future. also wts 2500 navy slicers
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
800
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 17:01:00 -
[39] - Quote
Soundwave talked quite a bit about how he'd like ice to matter more in the dev video cast today. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
Samroski
Games Inc.
180
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 18:26:00 -
[40] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Soundwave talked quite a bit about how he'd like ice to matter more in the dev video cast today. e: People look to be moving on BS tiericide speculation too. Nocx and zyd are the canaries... He wants ice to be more like oil, where the flow is controlled by few, and fought over. Though, from the discussion it appeared unlikely that (these) ice changes will make it to this patch. Nevertheless, best to stock up on ice and related products asap.
Happiness is a warm gun, mama. |
|
Speculation Dave
Tiericide Kings
4
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 19:04:00 -
[41] - Quote
mynnna wrote:People look to be moving on BS tiericide speculation too. hell yeah
|
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
447
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 21:53:00 -
[42] - Quote
Didn't somebody make patch speculation illegal, or was that just a night mare I had... PI Profitability spreadsheet
|
Dave Stark
2510
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 22:02:00 -
[43] - Quote
Samroski wrote:mynnna wrote:Soundwave talked quite a bit about how he'd like ice to matter more in the dev video cast today. e: People look to be moving on BS tiericide speculation too. Nocx and zyd are the canaries... He wants ice to be more like oil, where the flow is controlled by few, and fought over. Though, from the discussion it appeared unlikely that (these) ice changes will make it to this patch. Nevertheless, best to stock up on ice and related products asap.
ice, the new tech.
oh wait, he said he wanted people to fight over it. never mind. Maggie Thatcher. |
Ark Destroyer
Neutral Talent
284
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 16:51:00 -
[44] - Quote
What changes do you think they will do to ice that makes some people certain of its increase? If you removed it from high sec that would make it way more expensive, but I highly doubt that would happen... they buffed exhumers enough that they are very difficult to gank now, almost promoting semi-afk ice mining in high sec. I don't see why they would work against that. Neutral Talent CEO Specializing in "complete" super-capital packages
Complete supercapital packages |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
807
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:15:00 -
[45] - Quote
Ark Destroyer wrote:What changes do you think they will do to ice that makes some people certain of its increase? If you removed it from high sec that would make it way more expensive, but I highly doubt that would happen... they buffed exhumers enough that they are very difficult to gank now, almost promoting semi-afk ice mining in high sec. I don't see why they would work against that. Ice is so AFKable because the asteroids do not deplete. Even so little a change as making them deplete would make for a large change in the price. And, with Odyssey promising to shake up resources, it's a good bet that something happens. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
168
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 20:25:00 -
[46] - Quote
Cruiser Nexus Chips for the new Navy Battlecruisers? |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
807
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 21:05:00 -
[47] - Quote
Already inflated on account of the navy cruiser buffs, so they'd be a risky buy. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
0Lona 0ltor
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
36
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 21:53:00 -
[48] - Quote
Still touting Caldari Vice Admiral insignia as a zero risk investment due to NPC infinite buy order price of 500K. They used to sell for 5m isk a peice but now due to FW Gallente farming they are only 550k.
My bet is on CCP fixing FW soon as they will get fed up with 95/100 people joining Gallente just because they are winning so they can farm, when that happens vice admirals will sky rocket particularly if new LP data base changes come true. |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
168
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 22:30:00 -
[49] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Already inflated on account of the navy cruiser buffs, so they'd be a risky buy.
Well it hasnt stopped someone doubling their price in Amarr already.
It is a risky buy though, I assume you can still just get the blueprint and build them yourself without the Nexus Chip, so there will be alternative supply. |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
807
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 23:17:00 -
[50] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote:mynnna wrote:Already inflated on account of the navy cruiser buffs, so they'd be a risky buy. Well it hasnt stopped someone doubling their price in Amarr already.
In what timeframe, though. In jita they've all increased over the past week or so, since the original cruiser announcement.
0Lona 0ltor wrote:Still touting Caldari Vice Admiral insignia as a zero risk investment due to NPC infinite buy order price of 500K. They used to sell for 5m isk a peice but now due to FW Gallente farming they are only 550k.
My bet is on CCP fixing FW soon as they will get fed up with 95/100 people joining Gallente just because they are winning so they can farm, when that happens vice admirals will sky rocket particularly if new LP data base changes come true.
I'm not really sure what universe you're in that these are only 550k. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
|
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
124
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 10:57:00 -
[51] - Quote
A few thoughts..
There is a lot of positive to say about the game aspect of patch and expansion speculation, but is it not growing a bit out of proportions?
I am starting to wonder how much eve forum speculation threads are potentially making insider like trading possible. Now before I get flamed for saying this.. bots, automations, afk etc are all getting discussed frequently and with a lot of passion from those that feel they suffer from its balance issues..
How come there have been so little attention paid to the potential of creative use of insider knowledge, based on the way information is released?
The recent PAX slides was what made me question this a bit more then I used to. I think most of how things have been released works pretty fine all things considered, but this one was kinda different.
Releasing any type of information about upcoming game changes must be available to all of EVE, or it trends towards insider information sharing. Sure EVE players spread the information pretty fast, but is there not a need for some procedural "rules" when disclosing these things?
I think it would be nice to get CSM to actively get a statement and discussion on this, because already there is no way to really control the so called non written parts of information, neither source nor flow..
I am mainly bringing this up because speculation aspects seems to become a bigger and bigger part of patch/expansion economy.. It would be interesting to have access to or information about the hitory of how these positionings have grown?
|
Rama Sirius
Damorg Freedom Corp
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:07:00 -
[52] - Quote
Caleb Ayrania wrote:A few thoughts..
There is a lot of positive to say about the game aspect of patch and expansion speculation, but is it not growing a bit out of proportions?
I am starting to wonder how much eve forum speculation threads are potentially making insider like trading possible. Now before I get flamed for saying this.. bots, automations, afk etc are all getting discussed frequently and with a lot of passion from those that feel they suffer from its balance issues..
How come there have been so little attention paid to the potential of creative use of insider knowledge, based on the way information is released?
The recent PAX slides was what made me question this a bit more then I used to. I think most of how things have been released works pretty fine all things considered, but this one was kinda different.
Releasing any type of information about upcoming game changes must be available to all of EVE, or it trends towards insider information sharing. Sure EVE players spread the information pretty fast, but is there not a need for some procedural "rules" when disclosing these things?
I think it would be nice to get CSM to actively get a statement and discussion on this, because already there is no way to really control the so called non written parts of information, neither source nor flow..
I am mainly bringing this up because speculation aspects seems to become a bigger and bigger part of patch/expansion economy.. It would be interesting to have access to or information about the hitory of how these positionings have grown?
Indeed, I often feel completely out of the loop when the patches hit, although admittedly I am often slow to react I still cant help feeling some folks just seem to know exactly what to invest in.... |
Samroski
Games Inc.
181
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:22:00 -
[53] - Quote
Caleb Ayrania wrote:A few thoughts..
There is a lot of positive to say about the game aspect of patch and expansion speculation, but is it not growing a bit out of proportions?
I am starting to wonder how much eve forum speculation threads are potentially making insider like trading possible. Now before I get flamed for saying this.. bots, automations, afk etc are all getting discussed frequently and with a lot of passion from those that feel they suffer from its balance issues..
How come there have been so little attention paid to the potential of creative use of insider knowledge, based on the way information is released?
The recent PAX slides was what made me question this a bit more then I used to. I think most of how things have been released works pretty fine all things considered, but this one was kinda different.
Releasing any type of information about upcoming game changes must be available to all of EVE, or it trends towards insider information sharing. Sure EVE players spread the information pretty fast, but is there not a need for some procedural "rules" when disclosing these things?
I think it would be nice to get CSM to actively get a statement and discussion on this, because already there is no way to really control the so called non written parts of information, neither source nor flow..
I am mainly bringing this up because speculation aspects seems to become a bigger and bigger part of patch/expansion economy.. It would be interesting to have access to or information about the hitory of how these positionings have grown?
I feel the same way. There are many different sources from where one can get info about upcoming patches, and some of these may indeed be classified as insider trading, as everyone does not have equal opportunity for access.
Think all patch information could be limited to dev blogs. This is probably unrealistic, as there is sisi, F&I, tweets, fanfest, interviews and so on. On one hand I am all for increased communication, but like everything in life this is a double edged sword.
As an aside: what checks and balances are there on CSM to ensure that they do not use their insider knowledge for financial gains? What prevents them for giving a friend a tip, or from using an alt to speculate? Happiness is a warm gun, mama. |
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
127
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 14:25:00 -
[54] - Quote
Currently internal affairs is the only thing I know is keeping this under control..
Question is how much is focused on ingame related value, and how much is on more important issues like RMT and NDA breaching etc..
I think that is my key point, we need some sort of internal affairs department, that only cares about ingame value. Maybe a voluntary ISD like group? At least this might help get a bit of these potential issues out of the way. Also such a group of either vols or devs would be able to keep communication going about what is known and what might need to be kept very secret..
Ideally I believe transparency would be the best way. A dev blog from time to time actually disclosing the expected trends, but not the actual details.. So say with the discussed ICE they would come out and say there are changes that will trend like this and features that will impact this. "These are the expected trends based on consulting with investors" More would not be needed, and the speculation would then be about how much and a more fair bidding war would ensue..
Well that is just my personal POV..
|
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
807
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 14:59:00 -
[55] - Quote
Coming from a person who thinks that NPC services are evil and should be replaced entirely by player provided services (because the game should not hold our hand on those sorts of things), "I think CCP should hold our hands with regards to market speculation" is an odd standpoint.
Besides, "spelling out the trends in devblogs" or whatever is no more "fair" than tidbits being dropped at PAX or commented on in video devblogs (yeah, they talked about ice a lot there too.) It just benefits those who happen to be online at the time of the blog posting, instead of those willing to put in the effort to seek out kernels of information and then (despite the risk them being unconfirmed and potentially misleading) invest based on them.
Samroski wrote: As an aside: what checks and balances are there on CSM to ensure that they do not use their insider knowledge for financial gains? What prevents them for giving a friend a tip, or from using an alt to speculate?
With respect to alts, at least, do you really think that CCP can't figure out your alts on a whim? I'll grant that I did not go to great lengths (read: no measures taken) to hide them, but they certainly knew about all of my accounts during their investigation into the FW thing.
I'm not really sure about the "tip to a friend" thing though. But if I had to guess, they'd probably keep an eye out for large purchases of relevant items and if they do notice one, investigate from there. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
Rhivre
TarNec
42
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 15:51:00 -
[56] - Quote
I am split on this... For me, speculation is about the risk, and, more often than not, getting it wrong. The problem for me would be if speculation crosses the line into "definite knowledge".
I think perhaps perception is skewed, as we only hear of the success stories (for obvious reasons)....and if everyone who speculates big is winning big every time, then it is not really speculation.
Whilst I know that there are people who have made major isk on speculation, I do not think their success rate is extremely high, and it is difficult / impossible to differentiate between those who are actually speculating, and those who just write forum posts that they made mega isk on a speculation..... Such is the joy of Eve (and RL) :)
|
Marsan
Emergency and I
94
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 16:05:00 -
[57] - Quote
Honestly given all the information in interviews, and devblogs I'm just plain confused on what to invest in. Sure Battle Ships seem like a sure bet like BCs, frigates, and barges were in prior patches. Until you realize that most of the cost of a BS is minerals which didn't change greatly in most of the prior patches, but with a NS industry rebalance mineral prices could drop a lot. (Mainly if the devs actually provide enough trit and the like in NS for it's needs.) Likewise in the T2 market there is too much unknown about the changes to moon goo. In the tech3 market it appears nothing has changed until you take POS changes, and possible ice changes into account. If anything I may decide to make purchases based on the assumption that I'll sell off in the weeks before the patch lands. It might be easier to predict the herd direction than the effects of the next major patch. Former forum cheerleader CCP, now just a hopeful small portion of the community. |
Samroski
Games Inc.
181
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 16:56:00 -
[58] - Quote
mynnna wrote: With respect to alts, at least, do you really think that CCP can't figure out your alts on a whim? I'll grant that I did not go to great lengths (read: no measures taken) to hide them, but they certainly knew about all of my accounts during their investigation into the FW thing.
I'm not really sure about the "tip to a friend" thing though. But if I had to guess, they'd probably keep an eye out for large purchases of relevant items and if they do notice one, investigate from there.
I probably shouldn't have brought this up, as this is not an issue for me. I'm sure CCP get the CSM members to adhere to some form of a no-disclosure agreement, which is good enough for me. Not sure whether this agreement is informal/verbal or formal/legal/written?
I think speculation is an integral part of Eve, and I sincerely admire individuals who speculate based on their insight and understanding of the Eve economy. For me, it a natural progression of trade. When investing large amounts, speculation is a fascinating way to have fun. I'm relatively new to this aspect, and have had mixed success thanks to knowing next to nothing. Fun nevertheless.
In the game, every player, to an extent, has equal opportunities and access to information about the economy. Unfortunately, due to multiple (some obscure) sources of information out-of-game, access to information for speculation does not follow suit. I may be asking for too much (equal access to game changes info), and probably the skills to acquire this information is one of the prerequisites for speculation. Happiness is a warm gun, mama. |
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
128
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:15:00 -
[59] - Quote
This is one of those things where its really hard to reach a simple final conclusion..
I am a HUGE fan of the metagame in all its amazing glory, especially the way its progressed into what it is now..
That said I do see it as a bit of a problem if EVE trends toward demanding these things without being good enough at supporting the needed tools.
This is a bit akin to another passion of mine ARGs, where many expect extensive knowledge and access to tools to solve cryptos and narrative mysteries. In those it makes sort of sense that you need outside tools and out of context thinking, but in EVE ccp needs to make sure that the 3rd party involvement is not vital.. Espcially because stability is an issue..
Now Mynnna and many in the MD history have been good to share tools and information and engage in disccussion about the speculative aspect of EVE. Its just a bit iffy to me and would be nice to see ccp taking even more steps towards acknowledging how much EVE is not just inside the client. Again huge steps have already been taken in this aspect, but alas as always MD and markets gets attention last. I guess we are the ugly pup in the litter.
|
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
807
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:49:00 -
[60] - Quote
Samroski wrote:
In the game, every player, to an extent, has equal opportunities and access to information about the economy. Unfortunately, due to multiple (some obscure) sources of information out-of-game, access to information for speculation does not follow suit. I may be asking for too much (equal access to game changes info), and probably the skills to acquire this information is one of the prerequisites for speculation.
Everyone does have equal access to game change info, though. Dev blogs and the test server are public, and serve as confirmation. At that point, it's not really "speculation" anymore, to be perfectly frank. It's more like a foot race to see who can get to the market first. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
|
Samroski
Games Inc.
189
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:52:00 -
[61] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Samroski wrote:
In the game, every player, to an extent, has equal opportunities and access to information about the economy. Unfortunately, due to multiple (some obscure) sources of information out-of-game, access to information for speculation does not follow suit. I may be asking for too much (equal access to game changes info), and probably the skills to acquire this information is one of the prerequisites for speculation.
Everyone does have equal access to game change info, though. Dev blogs and the test server are public, and serve as confirmation. At that point, it's not really "speculation" anymore, to be perfectly frank. It's more like a foot race to see who can get to the market first. Continuing your argument: the real speculation, thus, is before the dev blogs/test server confirm changes.
The posts in this thread about Navy cruisers speculation support this.
Edit: and thus, everyone does not have equal access, as the info on which speculation is based in not always released on official Eve sites. Happiness is a warm gun, mama. |
Eric Ryan
The Scope Gallente Federation
23
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 05:39:00 -
[62] - Quote
Ice. I'm already sitting on over 1M cubes. |
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
535
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 06:06:00 -
[63] - Quote
From what im hearing, certain caugh minerals are the focus post patch. |
nStedt
Manu Factura
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 13:42:00 -
[64] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:From what im hearing, certain caugh minerals are the focus post patch.
Its prolly too late anyway to move on those rumours so would you mind sharing what you have heard with the rest of us? It could be interesting to hear what people are thinking it going to happen?
|
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
216
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 15:33:00 -
[65] - Quote
All that I know of that's in the public domain is this screenshot from a slideshow at PAX, when they were talking about Industry Rebalance.
http://i.imgur.com/F1sBVFf.jpg
It could imply Moon Minerals (on the right).
It could imply Ice (middle).
Or it could be none of the above. |
0Lona 0ltor
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
37
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 17:38:00 -
[66] - Quote
Tags on the left as I said, Ice in the middle, Incursions and of course moon goo. |
Zappity
Kurved Space
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 21:57:00 -
[67] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Everyone does have equal access to game change info, though...It's more like a foot race to see who can get to the market first.
Exactly. As a small player you sometimes get lucky timing and you sometimes don't. A consolidated and controlled source would likely mean I never got lucky at all!
Anyway, this is EVE. Why would you expect ANYTHING to be fair? Markets are still a game mechanic regardless of any similarity to RL counterparts. And that's great - we can play with strategies that an exchange regulator might take a decidedly dim view of. Hooray, I'm l33t! -á(Kil2: "The higher their ship losses...the better they're going to be.") |
Kyshonuba
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 02:47:00 -
[68] - Quote
After skilltree rebalance Iteron Mark V will only need Gallente industrial level I. Orca training time will be reduced from 49 to 17 days.
Maybe demand for those 2 ship types will rise. |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3995
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 11:02:00 -
[69] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Nocx and zyd are the canaries...
Nope, I have been at Grand Canaria 2 days ago and ATM I am at Adeje (south of Los Cristianos, Tenerife) and I have neither seen Nocx nor Zydrine
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3995
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 11:35:00 -
[70] - Quote
Zappity wrote:mynnna wrote:Everyone does have equal access to game change info, though...It's more like a foot race to see who can get to the market first. Exactly. As a small player you sometimes get lucky timing and you sometimes don't. A consolidated and controlled source would likely mean I never got lucky at all! Anyway, this is EVE. Why would you expect ANYTHING to be fair? Markets are still a game mechanic regardless of any similarity to RL counterparts. And that's great - we can play with strategies that an exchange regulator might take a decidedly dim view of.
Dear MD community members...
I really love many posts in this thread, because they show an overall community progression towards markets mechanics consciousness.
Now I'll add some of my own informations, largely taken from years of RL trading.
1) Trading is all about knowing more than the next guy, to the point one of the most in depth markets microstructure books by Larry Harris mention the terminology of "informed traders" vs "uninformed traders".
2) Both RL and EvE markets are all out PvP battlegrounds. Those who really believe RL markets are more regulated or even fair than EvE, are in for an huuuuuge wake up call. In reality, there have been past EvE insider "interactions" favoring certain parties and in RL you can actually and legally (for some good money) buy a "partial" advantage by having news (i.e. Bloomberg) delivered to you slightly before the rest of the world.
3) The fight for information is done with no respite, no restraint, no remorse. The collective of EvE (and RL) market players WILL use what's given to them AND will even set up their own advantage devices to prevail. That's just how markets work, it's part of their self optimizing nature. In this regard it's just a given that if 3rd party tools come available, those able to use/understand/exploit/access them, WILL do so and will possibly keep those tools secret. There are some exceptions to that (i.e. I shared every advantage tool I use) but they are due to personal inclinations and not the norm.
4) Patch speculation is not a "shoot in the dark and hope to hit the target" nor a "hop on the band wagon" activity. Those who do so become "liquidity providers", that is are those who WILL lose and will make the likes of Mynna, Akita T, me, Block Ukx richer. Patch and no patch speculation (swing trading does not require a patch to achieve results) require in depth knowledge of the game and / or knowledge of price reading and is done when the other traders don't even imagine what the hot items could be. Time and knowledge win the markets, waiting for news to be out and / or hopping on the band wagon are THE prime recipe for disaster, both in EvE and (way way more) in RL.
The worst possible combination is: hop on the band wagon AND late. This WILL insure you are the one who will lose money.
Always recall, the majority of market players lose. If you act like "everyone does this" you will also lose like "everyone doing this".
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|
Samroski
Games Inc.
201
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 14:17:00 -
[71] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Patch and no patch speculation (swing trading does not require a patch to achieve results) require in depth knowledge of the game and / or knowledge of price reading and is done when the other traders don't even imagine what the hot items could be.
QFT
These are the guys I envy :) Happiness is a warm gun, mama. |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3995
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 14:19:00 -
[72] - Quote
Samroski wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Patch and no patch speculation (swing trading does not require a patch to achieve results) require in depth knowledge of the game and / or knowledge of price reading and is done when the other traders don't even imagine what the hot items could be.
QFT These are the guys I envy :)
You don't need to, you could always go the lazy way like I do and just do price reading. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Samroski
Games Inc.
201
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 16:22:00 -
[73] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:You don't need to, you could always go the lazy way like I do and just do price reading. Sounds suspiciously like palm reading... Happiness is a warm gun, mama. |
Marsan
Emergency and I
95
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 17:11:00 -
[74] - Quote
Kyshonuba wrote:After skilltree rebalance Iteron Mark V will only need Gallente industrial level I. Orca training time will be reduced from 49 to 17 days.
Maybe demand for those 2 ship types will rise.
The Orca might be a good bet but I'm not sure about the Mark V. The dev have mentioned that these come along with balancing the Indys. This is assumed to mean some will be tanky, fast, or have large cargos. So in theory the mark 5 will have biggest cargo hold and only require Gal Indy 1 so everyone will want to fly it. This has a number of flaws:
- That it will be compelling in terms of cargo space at 1-3 skill levels vs badger at 4-5. (Remember the Caldari Charon is the biggest freighter so there are a lot of people with Caldari Indy at hgh levels) - That the Mark V will in fact have the largest cargo hold after rebalance. Caldari industrial ships generally have the largest cargo holds. - Mark V's are already priced pretty high so your margins may be low. - If the devs equalize the mineral cost for making various indys then there is likely to be a glut of cheap indys on the market for 6-12 months which will depress overall Indy prices.
Personally I'd look at the cheap lower end indys rather than the Mark V. Say the Hoarder, Sigil, and Wreathe..... Former forum cheerleader CCP, now just a hopeful small portion of the community. |
Samroski
Games Inc.
204
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 18:20:00 -
[75] - Quote
What about freighters? With the skill changes, where you'll be able to fly any freighter, I thought everybody would want to buy another one.
All the Charon pilots, who've been looking at Providences with lustful eyes for years, will immediately want to get their filthy hands on one. I have my eye on the Rhea, having despoiled the rest.
Despite this obvious expected increased interest in freighters, the prices continue to slide downwards. My prediction would have been quite the opposite. Happiness is a warm gun, mama. |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
845
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 19:46:00 -
[76] - Quote
Anything Tech I won't move much or, if it does, you'll have a narrow window to cash out in. Unless there are mineral changes involved (as with tiericide) I'd stay away from them, personally. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
Marsan
Emergency and I
95
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 23:57:00 -
[77] - Quote
Yeah anything that has a price set by minerals is a big risk. The devs have a history of tweaking minerals in ways that cause massive swings in ways they don't expect. (IE drone drop nerf) If they buff NS mining, and don't nerf HS mining in some fashion expect the price of minerals and T1 goods to drop. Of course they are equally capable of over nerfing HS and under buffing NS. T2 ships are in the same boat as devs record on moon goo changes isn't good. With changes ice, moon goo, and minerals on the table and no dev blogs with details for the next major patch there are not any sure wins this time around yet. I guess I need to keep running sleeper sites and doing PI to pay for my lack of pvp skill.... Former forum cheerleader CCP, now just a hopeful small portion of the community. |
Bling BlingBling
Nihilism.
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 00:03:00 -
[78] - Quote
Phantasms & Ashimmus guys.... |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
341
|
Posted - 2013.04.22 10:36:00 -
[79] - Quote
Ice fields disappeared altogether on one test server build source
They are certainly toying with the idea, Soundwave wants to (he has siad as much on the public record).
So maybe Ice moves to Null or Exploration, POS fuel goes through the roof, all those hi-sec POSes doing invention get pricey to run, all Tech 2 goods become much more expensive just in time for the re-balancing of Tech 2 ships.
Sounds like a plan to me. |
Hemmo Paskiainen
Aliastra Gallente Federation
409
|
Posted - 2013.04.22 11:18:00 -
[80] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote:Ice fields disappeared altogether on one test server build source They are certainly toying with the idea, Soundwave wants to (he has siad as much on the public record). So maybe Ice moves to Null or Exploration, POS fuel goes through the roof, all those hi-sec POSes doing invention get pricey to run, all Tech 2 goods become much more expensive just in time for the re-balancing of Tech 2 ships. Sounds like a plan to me.
Ice is moving to depletable exploration sites in high sec and W-Space CCP FIX BLACK OPS FFS
[url]http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/9679/whatihavedoneineve.jpg[/url] |
|
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
891
|
Posted - 2013.04.22 14:25:00 -
[81] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote:Ice fields disappeared altogether on one test server build source They are certainly toying with the idea, Soundwave wants to (he has siad as much on the public record). So maybe Ice moves to Null or Exploration, POS fuel goes through the roof, all those hi-sec POSes doing invention get pricey to run, all Tech 2 goods become much more expensive just in time for the re-balancing of Tech 2 ships. Sounds like a plan to me.
Yes there's a reason why I have 250b (at the old estimate, not the new price) in ice products in my hanger that I started buying back around PAX
Mynnna for CSM 8 |
Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
493
|
Posted - 2013.04.22 20:40:00 -
[82] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote:Ice fields disappeared altogether on one test server build source They are certainly toying with the idea, Soundwave wants to (he has siad as much on the public record). So maybe Ice moves to Null or Exploration, POS fuel goes through the roof, all those hi-sec POSes doing invention get pricey to run, all Tech 2 goods become much more expensive just in time for the re-balancing of Tech 2 ships. Sounds like a plan to me.
... points to the announcements in Odyssey about "Scanning" and "resource redistribution". Coincidence ?
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
352
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 10:51:00 -
[83] - Quote
- New Ice Belt names have appeared in some data tables: Blue Ice Belt, White Glaze Belt, Smooth Glacial Mass Belt
- T2 Ice Harvester Cycle halved from 500 to 250 seconds, presumably they are doubling ice harvesting rates to balance the difficulty of finding an ice field via exploration. |
Dave Stark
2760
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 11:03:00 -
[84] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote:- T2 Ice Harvester Cycle halved from 500 to 250 seconds, presumably they are doubling ice harvesting rates to balance the difficulty of finding an ice field via exploration.
well ****, and there was me saying ice harvesting couldn't get any easier unless ccp contracted it to you out of thin air.
bravo ccp, you got me. |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
352
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 11:11:00 -
[85] - Quote
But you will have to find a belt first..... |
Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
956
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 11:43:00 -
[86] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote:But you will have to find a belt first..... woe is us.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |
Dave Stark
2760
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 12:26:00 -
[87] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote:But you will have to find a belt first.....
at current ice prices, i'd rather not find them. even if you doubled it, it'd still probably rather not find an ice belt.
that's how bad ice is for isk/hour right now. |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
924
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 18:13:00 -
[88] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote:All that I know of that's in the public domain is this screenshot from a slideshow at PAX, when they were talking about Industry Rebalance. http://i.imgur.com/F1sBVFf.jpgIt could imply Moon Minerals (on the right). It could imply Ice (middle). Or it could be none of the above.
It also could imply Incursion iteration (upper right) Disclaimer: CCP Bias is a fictional character. In case that some CCP Bias does exist,-áis he an "ex"-Goon?
|
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
541
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 18:34:00 -
[89] - Quote
introduction of player owned starbases could possibly send the prices who knows where. |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
364
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 18:46:00 -
[90] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:introduction of player owned starbases could possibly send the prices who knows where.
I am I the only one not understanding that comment?
|
|
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
541
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 18:48:00 -
[91] - Quote
http://imgur.com/a/c3oYb#10 came from Mynnna's post on top bty, but again, its all up in the sky right now, nothing confirmed as fact from what I understand |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
364
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 18:53:00 -
[92] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:http://imgur.com/a/c3oYb#10 came from Mynnna's post on top bty, but again, its all up in the sky right now, nothing confirmed as fact from what I understand
But we already have player owned starbases..... that's what POS stands for.
And that slide refers to the 'little improvements' they are making to POSes that they have already announced in this dev blog.
http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/74807 |
Shaya Phnx
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 20:35:00 -
[93] - Quote
what do you think about cap rigs, the production prices are 4 times higher then large rigs:
http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/item.php?type_id=30994 http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/item.php?type_id=25895
i noticed the prices going up little, but not that much |
Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
498
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 21:46:00 -
[94] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:introduction of player owned starbases could possibly send the prices who knows where.
Personal style "residences" in space have been mentioned on and off, along with the other POS changes: like POS being anchorable anywhere (not just around moons) and being able to move (some sort of "jump drive" ) and I believe both details were mentioned by CCP Soundwave at last year's Fanfest. If I remember correctly. Should still be a video available in various places.
Those "cabins in space" would need fuels, too. Presumably POS fuels... but with PI always a good bet for expansion, who knows what might creep in under the radar.
Maybe PI produced "Twinkie" sized fuel rods... DOH !
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |
Umar Umarhabib
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 23:59:00 -
[95] - Quote
cap rigs have always been on this website, it has been there for years. nothing new. |
Nex apparatu5
Friendship is Podding Test Alliance Please Ignore
478
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 00:13:00 -
[96] - Quote
Umar Umarhabib wrote:cap rigs have always been on this website, it has been there for years. nothing new.
Well, except for CCP officially announcing they would be included in the next patch that is. And the production prices are 5 times the large rig production price.
And my titan comes out like two days after the patch |
Umar Umarhabib
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 00:30:00 -
[97] - Quote
Nex apparatu5 wrote:Umar Umarhabib wrote:cap rigs have always been on this website, it has been there for years. nothing new. Well, except for CCP officially announcing they would be included in the next patch that is. And the production prices are 5 times the large rig production price. And my titan comes out like two days after the patch
where???? link plz |
Rhivre
TarNec
59
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 01:14:00 -
[98] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=228222 |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
928
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 07:11:00 -
[99] - Quote
Umar Umarhabib wrote:Nex apparatu5 wrote:And my titan comes out like two days after the patch where???? link plz
Link to where his Titan is sooz it can be aborted Disclaimer: CCP Bias is a fictional character. In case that some CCP Bias does exist,-áis he an "ex"-Goon?
|
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
374
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 08:31:00 -
[100] - Quote
You should have bought up the stock then!
|
|
BrutalButFair
Happy Endings.
71
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 09:22:00 -
[101] - Quote
My best guess is agents in player owned stations. Missions to find plexes and destroy commander and get loot of the specific faction. So prob pirate/faction modules will drop in price.
This does 2 things a lot of people want. Buff nullsec a little bit and nerf higsec a little bit. |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
375
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 14:45:00 -
[102] - Quote
New Decryptors, plus old ones renamed.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2882636#post2882636 |
Umar Umarhabib
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 17:38:00 -
[103] - Quote
If Ice Fields have to be scanned, then it must mean they deplete.
Is there anything in Eve you have to scan, but after you find it, it stays there forever and never deplete? |
Elizabeth Norn
Tax Evasion Haven New Eden Research.
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 22:34:00 -
[104] - Quote
Umar Umarhabib wrote:If Ice Fields have to be scanned, then it must mean they deplete. Is there anything in Eve you have to scan, but after you find it, it stays there forever and never deplete?
Miners are the closest thing that fits your description. .
|
Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
525
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:41:00 -
[105] - Quote
Umar Umarhabib wrote: If Ice Fields have to be scanned, then it must mean they deplete.
Is there anything in Eve you have to scan, but after you find it, it stays there forever and never deplete?
Ka-ching.
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |
Chal82
Capital Gents Nulli Legio
7
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:52:00 -
[106] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Umar Umarhabib wrote: If Ice Fields have to be scanned, then it must mean they deplete.
Is there anything in Eve you have to scan, but after you find it, it stays there forever and never deplete?
Ka-ching.
I think they confirmed depletion a little later, they will deplete and regenerate after 4hrs
|
Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
878
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 19:24:00 -
[107] - Quote
Many popular ratting setups will become unusable once elite frigates are added to forsaken hubs. This might be an interesting opportunity for speculation (at least a little more interesting than minerals, ice, ...). TEST alt - don't trust. |
Arronicus
Shadows of Vorlon The Marmite Collective
564
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 22:36:00 -
[108] - Quote
Umar Umarhabib wrote:If Ice Fields have to be scanned, then it must mean they deplete. Is there anything in Eve you have to scan, but after you find it, it stays there forever and never deplete?
Yes. Moon mineral composition. |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
925
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 22:43:00 -
[109] - Quote
R64s are now bottlenecked. Expect them to rise, as well as the products that they go into at the intermediate and advanced levels.
Ice now depletes, has to be scanned out (which is easy, to be fair) and according to CCP "only 80% of demand can be met by highsec". I'd expect the price to at least triple as a result.
Gravimetric sites in nullsec are now quite attractive, with a ton of new low ends available to them. This will probably cause low end prices to fall, high end prices remain to be seen - there are a couple of scenarios. However, that still makes BS tiericide a good investment if they bump what are now tier 1 and tier 2 ships up to tier 3 build costs - even in the "worst case" scenario, a Tier 3 BS still costs about 150 or so to build.
Check themittani.com this weekend for a more in-depth look, once I finish writing it. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |
Stonkeep
Osmanli Empire
19
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 23:32:00 -
[110] - Quote
http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/resource-companion-blog/
Quote: Below is a list of the affected ore types, with the amount of minerals that they provide for each refine volume. Changes are in brackets.
Arkonor: 10000 Tritanium (+9700), 166 Zydrine, 333 Megacyte
Bistot: 12000 Pyerite (+11830), 341 Zydrine, 170 Megacyte
Crokite: 38000 Tritanium (+37669), 331 Nocxium, 663 Zydrine
Dark Ochre: 25500 Tritanium (+25250), 500 Nocxium, 250 Zydrine
Gneiss: 3700 Tritanium (+3529), 3700 Mexallon (+3529), 700 Isogen (+357), 171 Zydrine
Spodumain: 71000 Tritanium (+67810), 9000 Pyerite (+8590), 140 Megacyte
Trit and pyer getting much much cheaper ? |
|
TheSmokingHertog
TALIBAN EXPRESS
100
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 01:53:00 -
[111] - Quote
Umar Umarhabib wrote:If Ice Fields have to be scanned, then it must mean they deplete. Is there anything in Eve you have to scan, but after you find it, it stays there forever and never deplete?
On fanfest we heard that they could be depleted and would respawn with the same rate as the scanned down site now does. So icefield depletion would no longer have a refresh on DT only. |
Ravenclaw2kk
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
25
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 02:18:00 -
[112] - Quote
We should get more people mining ice as the value increases. Less people will mine veld, keeping the price of Trit up. At the end of the day, I would expect a balance between veld, pyroxies and ice in terms of isk per hour.
The amount of miners will probably decrease (by 33%?) due to people not being able to AFK ice mine. So as a guestimate, you could take the isk/hr of mining veld, pyerite ind ice, add them divide by 2 to get the new value. |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
926
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 02:21:00 -
[113] - Quote
Stonkeep wrote:http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/resource-companion-blog/ Quote: Below is a list of the affected ore types, with the amount of minerals that they provide for each refine volume. Changes are in brackets.
Arkonor: 10000 Tritanium (+9700), 166 Zydrine, 333 Megacyte
Bistot: 12000 Pyerite (+11830), 341 Zydrine, 170 Megacyte
Crokite: 38000 Tritanium (+37669), 331 Nocxium, 663 Zydrine
Dark Ochre: 25500 Tritanium (+25250), 500 Nocxium, 250 Zydrine
Gneiss: 3700 Tritanium (+3529), 3700 Mexallon (+3529), 700 Isogen (+357), 171 Zydrine
Spodumain: 71000 Tritanium (+67810), 9000 Pyerite (+8590), 140 Megacyte
Trit and pyer getting much much cheaper ?
That's almost a guarantee, although in the short term you should see prices bolstered somewhat by Tiericide, depending on the changes. A Tier 3 BS still costs ~160m at the low end (maelstrom) and ~200m at the high end (abaddon) even if (for example) trit drops to 4, pyerite to 8, mex to 45 and isogen to 90, with nocx, zyd and mega staying the same as they are now, so if current tier 1 and tier 2 prices are adjusted up to around tier 3 there's a lot of room to move, and people will be building lots of BS.
e: Wrote my deeper analysis, look for it on themittani.com tomorrow. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |
Whereis Mebong
Invictus Australis Scrap Iron Flotilla.
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 03:03:00 -
[114] - Quote
So how much will tech drop, and much will thulium etc go to? Are there any smart people here that can do some math on the info supplied info from the blogs? I can't count higher then 20 (thats all the digits i have)........maybe 21 if i have to...wink wink |
Arronicus
Shadows of Vorlon The Marmite Collective
578
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 04:22:00 -
[115] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Stonkeep wrote:http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/resource-companion-blog/ Quote: Below is a list of the affected ore types, with the amount of minerals that they provide for each refine volume. Changes are in brackets.
Arkonor: 10000 Tritanium (+9700), 166 Zydrine, 333 Megacyte
Bistot: 12000 Pyerite (+11830), 341 Zydrine, 170 Megacyte
Crokite: 38000 Tritanium (+37669), 331 Nocxium, 663 Zydrine
Dark Ochre: 25500 Tritanium (+25250), 500 Nocxium, 250 Zydrine
Gneiss: 3700 Tritanium (+3529), 3700 Mexallon (+3529), 700 Isogen (+357), 171 Zydrine
Spodumain: 71000 Tritanium (+67810), 9000 Pyerite (+8590), 140 Megacyte
Trit and pyer getting much much cheaper ? That's almost a guarantee, although in the short term you should see prices bolstered somewhat by Tiericide, depending on the changes. A Tier 3 BS still costs ~160m at the low end (maelstrom) and ~200m at the high end (abaddon) even if (for example) trit drops to 4, pyerite to 8, mex to 45 and isogen to 90, with nocx, zyd and mega staying the same as they are now, so if current tier 1 and tier 2 prices are adjusted up to around tier 3 there's a lot of room to move, and people will be building lots of BS. e: Wrote my deeper analysis, look for it on themittani.com tomorrow.
While this is true, I believe there is a reasonable chance that CCP will make a case for Battleships similar to battlecruisers, and will only bump tier 1 bs up to the level of tier 2, with the possibility of (a precedent) moving tier 3 down to tier 2, or leaving it where it is. This would see a much more neglible increase in value of investment, with the possibility of isk being lost, with enough of a mineral drop. |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
928
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 04:28:00 -
[116] - Quote
Arronicus wrote:While this is true, I believe there is a reasonable chance that CCP will make a case for Battleships similar to battlecruisers, and will only bump tier 1 bs up to the level of tier 2, with the possibility of (a precedent) moving tier 3 down to tier 2, or leaving it where it is. This would see a much more neglible increase in value of investment, with the possibility of isk being lost, with enough of a mineral drop.
If they do lower Tier 3 to Tier 2, all bets are off, yes. But if they don't, then the Domi, Apoc and Raven all have to (well, okay, "probably") increase up to Tier 3, as they're becoming Combat BS alongside the existing Tier 3, and the worst case for the remaining ships (Geddon, Tempest, Typhoon and Megathron) is becoming/staying at Tier 2 as the Attack class.
I can't rule it out, but I would be rather surprised if they lowered the cost of the ship. If nothing else, BS sitting around 200m (at current mineral prices of course) makes sense. Given those same current prices, you have cruisers around 8-10m and battlecruisers around 50. 200 is a decent next logical step in the progression.
We'll see soon enough though. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |
El 1974
Green Visstick High Green Rhino
82
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 06:40:00 -
[117] - Quote
Ravenclaw2kk wrote:We should get more people mining ice as the value increases. Less people will mine veld, keeping the price of Trit up. At the end of the day, I would expect a balance between veld, pyroxies and ice in terms of isk per hour.
The amount of miners will probably decrease (by 33%?) due to people not being able to AFK ice mine. There's not going to be enough ice. Most ice fields will deplete before the site respawns. This guarantees that ice will be expensive. I expect lots of ore miners will become part-time ice miners. And the more ice miners there are, the faster those sites will deplete. I expect a lot of miners will mine ice till the sites deplete and then log off, mine ores, run missions or whatever. People will set their alarmclocks for this. |
Ravenclaw2kk
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
25
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 06:49:00 -
[118] - Quote
Yea. 80% off all ice requirements are going to be seeded in hi-sec. Assuming they are fully mined, there will still be a big bottleneck.
I'm glad I bought a bunch of fuel a few weeks ago. I just spent another 4bn on ice for the hell of it, I'd imagine it would have to go up to a decent isk/hr rate now that it will be more or less the same as mining regular ore.
Even with the isotopes at 1000 isk p/u, you will only be pulling in 20m per hour mining ice. No point really, if you can not afk mine any more. |
Kithran
53
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 07:41:00 -
[119] - Quote
Ravenclaw2kk wrote:Yea. 80% off all ice requirements are going to be seeded in hi-sec. Assuming they are fully mined, there will still be a big bottleneck.
I'm glad I bought a bunch of fuel a few weeks ago. I just spent another 4bn on ice for the hell of it, I'd imagine it would have to go up to a decent isk/hr rate now that it will be more or less the same as mining regular ore.
Even with the isotopes at 1000 isk p/u, you will only be pulling in 20m per hour mining ice. No point really, if you can not afk mine any more.
Have you factored the halving of the cycle time into your calculation? |
Ravenclaw2kk
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
25
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 11:22:00 -
[120] - Quote
Kithran wrote:Ravenclaw2kk wrote:Yea. 80% off all ice requirements are going to be seeded in hi-sec. Assuming they are fully mined, there will still be a big bottleneck.
I'm glad I bought a bunch of fuel a few weeks ago. I just spent another 4bn on ice for the hell of it, I'd imagine it would have to go up to a decent isk/hr rate now that it will be more or less the same as mining regular ore.
Even with the isotopes at 1000 isk p/u, you will only be pulling in 20m per hour mining ice. No point really, if you can not afk mine any more. Have you factored the halving of the cycle time into your calculation?
it doesn't really matter if it takes 1 hour to deplete a belt or 2 hours. Supply is fixed at a maximum of 80% eve needs in hi-sec.
Cycle time will not increase the amount of available ice. So people be mining ice for 1hr and then other ores for the other 3hrs.
They will only really do that if ice is much higher than the other ores in isk/hr. |
|
wallenbergaren
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 11:26:00 -
[121] - Quote
Of course it does matter, the site most likely respawns 4 hours after it's depleted not 4 hours after it's spawned |
Ravenclaw2kk
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
25
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 12:04:00 -
[122] - Quote
"At our current numbers, the maximum supply of ice from highsec (assuming that each belt is mined out completely five times a day) would provide approximately 80% of the game's ice needs, ensuring that at least some of the ice mining must be undertaken in lower security space"
80% of ice assuming all the ice belts get mined out fully, within the first hour, from every hi-sec, ice holding system in eve. |
Captain IQ
Innocent Traders Ltd
14
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 12:46:00 -
[123] - Quote
ICE, ICE baby.
I use to know a 100% ice mining corp once, I really hope they're now raking it in. |
K'ashell K'aran
Soviet Canuckistan Technologies
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 12:51:00 -
[124] - Quote
Anyone know what the likelihood of battleship blueprints base prices changing as a result of the Tiericide? They recently adjusted the prices of many BPOs, but I know that when the Cruisers were changed the BPO prices also changed to be more inline with one another. |
El 1974
Green Visstick High Green Rhino
82
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 13:01:00 -
[125] - Quote
Ravenclaw2kk wrote:"At our current numbers, the maximum supply of ice from highsec (assuming that each belt is mined out completely five times a day) would provide approximately 80% of the game's ice needs, ensuring that at least some of the ice mining must be undertaken in lower security space"
80% of ice assuming all the ice belts get mined out fully, within the first hour, from every hi-sec, ice holding system in eve. If I understand it correctly, if you can do it fast enough you might get 6 belts: 1. 11:15 (After DT) 2. 15:55 3. 20:35 4. 1:15 5. 5:55 6. 10:35 |
Ravenclaw2kk
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
25
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 13:04:00 -
[126] - Quote
El 1974 wrote:Ravenclaw2kk wrote:"At our current numbers, the maximum supply of ice from highsec (assuming that each belt is mined out completely five times a day) would provide approximately 80% of the game's ice needs, ensuring that at least some of the ice mining must be undertaken in lower security space"
80% of ice assuming all the ice belts get mined out fully, within the first hour, from every hi-sec, ice holding system in eve. If I understand it correctly, if you can do it fast enough you might get 6 belts: 1. 11:15 (After DT) 2. 15:55 3. 20:35 4. 1:15 5. 5:55 6. 10:35
True, but what is the likelihood of having all the belts completely mined out within 30 mins. Ice miners are the laziest people i know. They generally point their lasers at a rock and go afk for 30 mins while watching tv. There is going to be a big reduction in the number of part-time ice miners, not to mention bots. |
Dilbert HighSeed
Pirannha Corp
12
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 15:32:00 -
[127] - Quote
Ravenclaw2kk wrote:El 1974 wrote:Ravenclaw2kk wrote:"At our current numbers, the maximum supply of ice from highsec (assuming that each belt is mined out completely five times a day) would provide approximately 80% of the game's ice needs, ensuring that at least some of the ice mining must be undertaken in lower security space"
80% of ice assuming all the ice belts get mined out fully, within the first hour, from every hi-sec, ice holding system in eve. If I understand it correctly, if you can do it fast enough you might get 6 belts: 1. 11:15 (After DT) 2. 15:55 3. 20:35 4. 1:15 5. 5:55 6. 10:35 True, but what is the likelihood of having all the belts completely mined out within 30 mins. Ice miners are the laziest people i know. They generally point their lasers at a rock and go afk for 30 mins while watching tv. There is going to be a big reduction in the number of part-time ice miners, not to mention bots. I dunno, I have a supply for my needs and then a little. I hope it spikes to 1000 and settles around 600. But I haven't really done any proper analysis. Edit - I also, don't understand the distribution fully. I would imagine that the majority of the caldari towers are in hi-sec. If ice fields are distributed equally among the different faction space, then that may leave a shortfall in hi-sec white-glaze for hi-sec pos.
All part of the plan to drive high sec profitability into the ground. |
Dave Stark
2886
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 16:12:00 -
[128] - Quote
El 1974 wrote:Ravenclaw2kk wrote:"At our current numbers, the maximum supply of ice from highsec (assuming that each belt is mined out completely five times a day) would provide approximately 80% of the game's ice needs, ensuring that at least some of the ice mining must be undertaken in lower security space"
80% of ice assuming all the ice belts get mined out fully, within the first hour, from every hi-sec, ice holding system in eve. If I understand it correctly, if you can do it fast enough you might get 6 belts: 1. 11:15 (After DT) 2. 15:55 3. 20:35 4. 1:15 5. 5:55 6. 10:35
there isn't 4 hours between 6 and 1. anoms aren't affected by downtime respawns, assuming they follow the same rules grav sites do. which, they should. |
YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
717
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 21:30:00 -
[129] - Quote
Most Ice products already doubled in buy price and we are still greater than a month away.
The trick for a non-RL trader like me is to gage whether the speculation will actually outdo the actual supply-demand changes. IE, do I sell when the speculation hits its peak, or hold until things really settle-down longer term...
yk |
Modulated stripminer
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:41:00 -
[130] - Quote
Ice will be enough I personally know few systems with more than one ice belt that have very few ice miners, which according to ccp will still have 2belts but have to be scanned now.It will be best to sell right before patch because when patch hits many people will be burned horribly, there will be enough ice for all and yes prices will increase but as much as people expect.... i doubt it. |
|
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
608
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 05:42:00 -
[131] - Quote
Stonkeep wrote:http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/resource-companion-blog/ Quote: Below is a list of the affected ore types, with the amount of minerals that they provide for each refine volume. Changes are in brackets.
Arkonor: 10000 Tritanium (+9700), 166 Zydrine, 333 Megacyte
Bistot: 12000 Pyerite (+11830), 341 Zydrine, 170 Megacyte
Crokite: 38000 Tritanium (+37669), 331 Nocxium, 663 Zydrine
Dark Ochre: 25500 Tritanium (+25250), 500 Nocxium, 250 Zydrine
Gneiss: 3700 Tritanium (+3529), 3700 Mexallon (+3529), 700 Isogen (+357), 171 Zydrine
Spodumain: 71000 Tritanium (+67810), 9000 Pyerite (+8590), 140 Megacyte
Trit and pyer getting much much cheaper ?
I have a gut feeling this is being done to keep people from wreaking havoc on ship prices like what happened to mining ships, (frigates recovered mostly) and the still mostly unprofitable cruisers. also, im pretty sure this will make low/nulsec a little bit more attractive now.
Moon mat changes, I think that ones pretty obvious, large scale alliance warfare is dead, compared to what it was back when I started playing the game.
I knew tech was going to be the money maker, but I definitely didn't foresee it happening like this, it appears finished products and not advanced moon mats are the focus now. |
Rual Storge
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 13:33:00 -
[132] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:Stonkeep wrote:http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/resource-companion-blog/ Quote: Below is a list of the affected ore types, with the amount of minerals that they provide for each refine volume. Changes are in brackets.
Arkonor: 10000 Tritanium (+9700), 166 Zydrine, 333 Megacyte
Bistot: 12000 Pyerite (+11830), 341 Zydrine, 170 Megacyte
Crokite: 38000 Tritanium (+37669), 331 Nocxium, 663 Zydrine
Dark Ochre: 25500 Tritanium (+25250), 500 Nocxium, 250 Zydrine
Gneiss: 3700 Tritanium (+3529), 3700 Mexallon (+3529), 700 Isogen (+357), 171 Zydrine
Spodumain: 71000 Tritanium (+67810), 9000 Pyerite (+8590), 140 Megacyte
Trit and pyer getting much much cheaper ? I have a gut feeling this is being done to keep people from wreaking havoc on ship prices like what happened to mining ships, (frigates recovered mostly) and the still mostly unprofitable cruisers. also, im pretty sure this will make low/nulsec a little bit more attractive now. Moon mat changes, I think that ones pretty obvious, large scale alliance warfare is dead, compared to what it was back when I started playing the game. I knew tech was going to be the money maker, but I definitely didn't foresee it happening like this, it appears finished products and not advanced moon mats are the focus now.
I see thulluim went 3 months ago for 1500 isk pu now its 12000 isk pu.... What are the effects from this patch on the thullium price? I know it is the rarest R64 by plannet numbers. |
Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
548
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 14:53:00 -
[133] - Quote
Ravenclaw2kk wrote: Even with the isotopes at 1000 isk p/u, you will only be pulling in 20m per hour mining ice. No point really, if you can not afk mine any more.
Unless you mine with a supported fleet, properly organized to deploy and mine as efficiently as possible when the ice spawns. CCP wants player corps to be more cohesive and cooperative, not linger around AFK for days at a time, and the relative rarity of ice in the future (compared to what it is now) is incentive for that kind of cooperative effort.
And I'm beginning to think that ice prices may go a fair bit higher than some of the pre-Fanfest speculation suggested.
Call it a hunch based mostly on human nature.
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |
Soldarius
Deadman W0nderland Tribal Band
312
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 00:42:00 -
[134] - Quote
If you can't figure out into what goons are sinking their money, you fail at eve market speculation.
Tech is not dead yet. But a huge reduction in demand is incoming. So say you're sitting on billions if not trillions of isk in Tech (pre-patch announcement value) that you know is going to lose like 50% value, what do you do with it?
You also know that Thullium is on the way up. At least a doubling in demand.
The path is clear. "How do you kill that which has no life?" |
Carton Mantory
Occassus Republica
16
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 14:00:00 -
[135] - Quote
Tech II mods will go way up. Tech II cruise will be the most insane price ammo ever....
When you add an intermediate component to the tech II world you effect up and down stream.
Look at your charters. They will be work 20k each... Microprocessors are the core component to Tech II..
Good luck on trading anything now. It will freeze in a week after the patch. |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
979
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:48:00 -
[136] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Even with the isotopes at 1000 isk p/u, you will only be pulling in 20m per hour mining ice. No point really, if you can not afk mine any more.
Isotopes and ozone being at 1k result in racial ice products (in null) being closer to 50m/hr, with the non-racial stuff (eg Dark Glitter) going higher. It will be quite lucrative. And more to the point, the fact that the "if I can't AFK it it's not worth it" meme is even a thing is evidence of a fundamental wrongness in the game, which I am exceedingly happy to see them correct. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |
Ristlin Wakefield
Rama Squadron Eternal Pretorian Alliance
311
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 19:04:00 -
[137] - Quote
I've taken advantage of the huge spike in T2 rig prices -- especially for the t2 large trimark. Certain T1 salvage also spiked, some notable examples being nanite compound, which moved by 300% -- unfortunately my supply wasn't that high.
I've also stockpiled T2 rig components (the price has dropped for some items by about 15%) with an eye on it passing -- or at least matching -- previous highs seen earlier this year during the large cap/supercap movements into SOLAR space.
There are some risks though. Following the patch, I expect renewed interest in exploration and possible flooding in the market due to spikes in salvage supply. I have a lover, her name is EVE. I see her every night and all she asks in return is that I have a pilot's license. |
Zedutchman
Bluewater Industries Gold Star Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:57:00 -
[138] - Quote
mynnna wrote:[
Isotopes and ozone being at 1k result in racial ice products (in null) being closer to 50m/hr, with the non-racial stuff (eg Dark Glitter) going higher. It will be quite lucrative. And more to the point, the fact that the "if I can't AFK it it's not worth it" meme is even a thing is evidence of a fundamental wrongness in the game, which I am exceedingly happy to see them correct.
Although the Ice prices will put a hurting on my corp in general I'm pretty happy with the change. Ice mining was just about the dullest most pointless activity in eve. And THAT's coming from someone who enjoys mining. You need to look at your screen about once every 35 mins to ice mine at maximum effectiveness.
I'm not sure the change they are making is the correct one to fix the problem, but at least they are doing SOMETHING to fix it. I'll give them an E for effort but I think the change they are making will have repercussions far beyond what they are anticipating.
|
YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
722
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:57:00 -
[139] - Quote
mynnna wrote: And more to the point, the fact that the "if I can't AFK it it's not worth it" meme is even a thing is evidence of a fundamental wrongness in the game, which I am exceedingly happy to see them correct.
I've always said that Eve is designed to have an appeal to the entire spectrum of gameplay. From the ultra-extreme hardcore gamer to the ultra-relaxed casual player. If ice was appealing to the ultra-relaxed then Eve is big enough for that style of gameplay and whose anyone to say that their style of play isn't 'acceptable'.
yk |
Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3395
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:04:00 -
[140] - Quote
Bling BlingBling wrote:Succubi & Phantasms. Guaranteed Pirate Cruisers are next up on the re balance schedule.
The devs seemed to have no idea about those ships at fanfest. I'd be very surprised if they're boosted in the next 2-3 iterations.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
|
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
999
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:38:00 -
[141] - Quote
YuuKnow wrote:mynnna wrote: And more to the point, the fact that the "if I can't AFK it it's not worth it" meme is even a thing is evidence of a fundamental wrongness in the game, which I am exceedingly happy to see them correct. I've always said that Eve is designed to have an appeal to the entire spectrum of gameplay. From the ultra-extreme hardcore gamer to the ultra-relaxed casual player. If ice was appealing to the ultra-relaxed then Eve is big enough for that style of gameplay and whose anyone to say that their style of play isn't 'acceptable'. yk
I have trouble defining "that style of gameplay" as actual gameplay, considering there's barely any actual interaction with the game. I'm equally skeptical of calling things like "afktar" ratting - that is, warping an Ishtar with sentries into an anomaly and going afk while your drones wipe out the anomaly - "gameplay" too, for the record, so this isn't just some sort of bias or crusade against highsec.
Casual gameplay, in my mind, means something a player who can only log in for a short period of time can undock and go and complete. The new exploration stuff is a great example of this. It's quick, interesting, probably is fairly rewarding, and most importantly, there's actual player/game engagement. You know, "gameplay". Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |
YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
722
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:31:00 -
[142] - Quote
mynnna wrote:I have trouble defining "that style of gameplay" as actual gameplay, considering there's barely any actual interaction with the game. I'm equally skeptical of calling things like "afktar" ratting - that is, warping an Ishtar with sentries into an anomaly and going afk while your drones wipe out the anomaly - "gameplay" too, for the record, so this isn't just some sort of bias or crusade against highsec.
Casual gameplay, in my mind, means something a player who can only log in for a short period of time can undock and go and complete. The new exploration stuff is a great example of this. It's quick, interesting, probably is fairly rewarding, and most importantly, there's actual player/game engagement. You know, "gameplay".
Semantics.
The fact is that that style of play appeals to a certain sect of the player-base and who is someone else to dictate whether its acceptable or not.
yk |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1002
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 03:02:00 -
[143] - Quote
Distinguishing the difference between actual interaction with and engagement by the game and entering a few commands every twenty minutes is not "semantics." Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
4030
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 03:06:00 -
[144] - Quote
YuuKnow wrote: Semantics.
"A game is structured playing, usually undertaken for enjoyment and sometimes used as an educational tool. Games are distinct from work, which is usually carried out for remuneration, and from art, which is more often an expression of aesthetic or ideological elements. However, the distinction is not clear-cut, and many games are also considered to be work (such as professional players of spectator sports/games) or art (such as jigsaw puzzles or games involving an artistic layout such as Mahjong, solitaire, or some video games).
Key components of games are goals, rules, challenge, and interaction. Games generally involve mental or physical stimulation, and often both. Many games help develop practical skills, serve as a form of exercise, or otherwise perform an educational, simulational, or psychological role."
It's painfully obvious that pressing three buttons and than walking away from the keyboard for 20 minutes fulfills none of the above criteria even remotely. Don't get me wrong here - I "AFK" ice mine like everyone else while writing, drawing, or playing other games - but I'm not so ignorant as to pretend I'm actually playing a game while sucking down isotopes. Council of Planetary Management Delegate / Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.-á |
YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
723
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 06:04:00 -
[145] - Quote
Quote:World English Dictionary
game 1 (+íe+¬m) [Click for IPA pronunciation guide]
GÇö n 1. an amusement or pastime; diversion
All that is required.
An again. If you don't find it appealing, then don't do it. Duh. For those that otherwise liked the slow, lackadaisical minimalism that still allows them to login to the make-believe sci-fi fiction of Eve, then so be it.
What's your argument? That mining trit requires 3 button pushes every 5 minutes, so its 'gameplay', but mining ice requires 3 button pushes every 30 minutes so that is not? Completely arbitrary. Your not them and you can't dictate what they do or don't enjoy.
yk |
Chief Ambassador
Eve Embassy Eve Engineering
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 10:57:00 -
[146] - Quote
I think the price of supers will go down by 30% or so. |
EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
655
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 12:57:00 -
[147] - Quote
YuuKnow wrote:Quote:World English Dictionary
game 1 (+íe+¬m) [Click for IPA pronunciation guide]
GÇö n 1. an amusement or pastime; diversion All that is required. An again. If you don't find it appealing, then don't do it. Duh. For those that otherwise liked the slow, lackadaisical minimalism that still allows them to login to the make-believe sci-fi fiction of Eve, then so be it. What's your argument? That mining trit requires 3 button pushes every 5 minutes, so its 'gameplay', but mining ice requires 3 button pushes every 30 minutes so that is not? Completely arbitrary. Your not them and you can't dictate what they do or don't enjoy. yk an argument from the dictionary when discussing technical matters is the equivalent of a dunce cap |
Chief Ambassador
Eve Embassy Eve Engineering
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:49:00 -
[148] - Quote
So what do you guys think will happen to super prices?
1. Stay the same. 2. Go down. (if so by what %) 3. Go up. |
Zedutchman
Bluewater Industries Gold Star Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 17:00:00 -
[149] - Quote
mynnna wrote:
I have trouble defining "that style of gameplay" as actual gameplay, considering there's barely any actual interaction with the game.
I'm not certain why this is such a point of contention for you. As Yuuknow pointed out it doesn't really effect you so why do you care? However, since that didn't put you off your attack I will make a single point.
CCP IS changing ice mining. Therefore your argument over it's current state is not only an entirely moot, but has nothing to do with the topic of this thread.
____________________________________________
And I agree That Super Prices will likely decrease with the new changes. |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1035
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 17:09:00 -
[150] - Quote
Zedutchman wrote:mynnna wrote:
I have trouble defining "that style of gameplay" as actual gameplay, considering there's barely any actual interaction with the game.
I'm not certain why this is such a point of contention for you. As Yuuknow pointed out it doesn't really effect you so why do you care? However, since that didn't put you off your attack I will make a single point. CCP IS changing ice mining. Therefore your argument over it's current state is not only an entirely moot, but has nothing to do with the topic of this thread.
On the contrary, my argument regarding the current state of mining is extremely relevant, as CCP's changes - taking away the ability to do extremely low interaction "gameplay" all day long and replacing it with something that demands a higher level of interaction - demonstrates that they feel the same way. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |
|
YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
728
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 23:21:00 -
[151] - Quote
mynnna wrote:On the contrary, my argument regarding the current state of mining is extremely relevant, as CCP's changes - taking away the ability to do extremely low interaction "gameplay" all day long and replacing it with something that demands a higher level of interaction - demonstrates that they feel the same way.
Can't say that I read minds, but my impression was that the ice changes were less about eliminating afk'er and more about turning ice into the conflict-driver that it had the potential to become. Resource competition and economic incentive are generally good conflict-drivers, and the presence of an infinite/never-depleting rock that could be mined forever didn't have any contribution to the economic conflicts that help to make Eve interesting. Turning ice more into the Eve version of RL oil, and rightfully so, makes things more dynamic, which I think everyone would agree with.
But hopefully not because ccp wanted to suppress the game-style of some of its players which choose solo mine or afk miner play.
yk |
Zappity
Kurved Space
49
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 00:39:00 -
[152] - Quote
YuuKnow wrote:Can't say that I read minds, but my impression was that the ice changes were less about eliminating afk'er and more about turning ice into the conflict-driver that it had the potential to become. Resource competition and economic incentive are generally good conflict-drivers, and the presence of an infinite/never-depleting rock that could be mined forever didn't have any contribution to the economic conflicts that help to make Eve interesting. Turning ice more into the Eve version of RL oil, and rightfully so, makes things more dynamic, which I think everyone would agree with.
But hopefully not because ccp wanted to suppress the game-style of some of its players which choose solo mine or afk miner play.
yk
What an astonishing post. How can you even attempt to justify AFK behaviour in an MMO?
I badly want to gank an AFK miner now. If I find one I will direct them here for reference. Hooray, I'm l33t! -á(Kil2: "The higher their ship losses...the better they're going to be.") |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1042
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 04:36:00 -
[153] - Quote
YuuKnow wrote:mynnna wrote:On the contrary, my argument regarding the current state of mining is extremely relevant, as CCP's changes - taking away the ability to do extremely low interaction "gameplay" all day long and replacing it with something that demands a higher level of interaction - demonstrates that they feel the same way. Can't say that I read minds, but my impression was that the ice changes were less about eliminating afk'er and more about turning ice into the conflict-driver that it had the potential to become. Resource competition and economic incentive are generally good conflict-drivers, and the presence of an infinite/never-depleting rock that could be mined forever didn't have any contribution to the economic conflicts that help to make Eve interesting. Turning ice more into the Eve version of RL oil, and rightfully so, makes things more dynamic, which I think everyone would agree with.
I...
wait...
why are we even arguing again? We seem to agree. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |
OfBalance
Caldari State
441
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 04:50:00 -
[154] - Quote
Chief Ambassador wrote:So what do you guys think will happen to super prices?
1. Stay the same. 2. Go down. (if so by what %) 3. Go up.
4. Death to all? |
Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
883
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 20:08:00 -
[155] - Quote
mynnna wrote:YuuKnow wrote:mynnna wrote:On the contrary, my argument regarding the current state of mining is extremely relevant, as CCP's changes - taking away the ability to do extremely low interaction "gameplay" all day long and replacing it with something that demands a higher level of interaction - demonstrates that they feel the same way. Can't say that I read minds, but my impression was that the ice changes were less about eliminating afk'er and more about turning ice into the conflict-driver that it had the potential to become. Resource competition and economic incentive are generally good conflict-drivers, and the presence of an infinite/never-depleting rock that could be mined forever didn't have any contribution to the economic conflicts that help to make Eve interesting. Turning ice more into the Eve version of RL oil, and rightfully so, makes things more dynamic, which I think everyone would agree with. I... wait... why are we even arguing again? We seem to agree.
I just saw all these pages you have been busying doing outreach to the unwashed masses. The CSM job sucks. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Cabal Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |
YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
729
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 00:48:00 -
[156] - Quote
mynnna wrote:YuuKnow wrote:mynnna wrote:On the contrary, my argument regarding the current state of mining is extremely relevant, as CCP's changes - taking away the ability to do extremely low interaction "gameplay" all day long and replacing it with something that demands a higher level of interaction - demonstrates that they feel the same way. Can't say that I read minds, but my impression was that the ice changes were less about eliminating afk'er and more about turning ice into the conflict-driver that it had the potential to become. Resource competition and economic incentive are generally good conflict-drivers, and the presence of an infinite/never-depleting rock that could be mined forever didn't have any contribution to the economic conflicts that help to make Eve interesting. Turning ice more into the Eve version of RL oil, and rightfully so, makes things more dynamic, which I think everyone would agree with. I... wait... why are we even arguing again? We seem to agree.
Not arguing. I think everyone thinks the ice changes are good for the game.
I just think that one of the things that make Eve great is that their are sooooooo many different styles of play. I hate seeing one sec of players trying to dictate the 'acceptable' play styles to another sec. Eve's big enough for everyone's style.
yk |
Drachiel
Mercury LLC
12
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 23:27:00 -
[157] - Quote
Battleships go up, up up!
Most have around 30M to climb just to make up for the new build costs. |
YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
742
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 23:35:00 -
[158] - Quote
On a semi-random note. Anyone know the percentage of POS that are in WH space, null sec space, and low-sec space respectively? Seems like a conveniently missing piece of data for speculation purposes.
yk |
Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations
65
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 23:44:00 -
[159] - Quote
The gnosis will be the ultimate surprise win. Just wait and see.... See Bio for isk doubling rules. -áIf you didn't read bio, chances are you helped fund those who did. |
Idol1
IGI Purchasing
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 03:47:00 -
[160] - Quote
People mine ice exactly because it's easy money. Make it a PITA to mine ice and no one is going to mine ice. It just won't be worth it. You can make much more money mining ore even now that the ice is endless. Put a limit on the amount of ice combined with a 4 hour possible wait time and no one is going to touch the stuff. |
|
Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
606
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:10:00 -
[161] - Quote
Idol1 wrote:People mine ice exactly because it's easy money. Make it a PITA to mine ice and no one is going to mine ice. It just won't be worth it. You can make much more money mining ore even now that the ice is endless. Put a limit on the amount of ice combined with a 4 hour possible wait time and no one is going to touch the stuff.
This, exactly.
Looking at a few of the ice fields in Caldari space over the past week, the smaller numbers suggests that some ice miners have already shifted back to ore in the hopes of getting ahead on BS production before Odyssey.
And, of course, after a few weeks of chasing anoms the "Can't Be Arsed" factor will climb steadily.
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |
Idol1
IGI Purchasing
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 18:16:00 -
[162] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Idol1 wrote:People mine ice exactly because it's easy money. Make it a PITA to mine ice and no one is going to mine ice. It just won't be worth it. You can make much more money mining ore even now that the ice is endless. Put a limit on the amount of ice combined with a 4 hour possible wait time and no one is going to touch the stuff. This, exactly. Looking at a few of the ice fields in Caldari space over the past week, the smaller numbers suggests that some ice miners have already shifted back to ore in the hopes of getting ahead on BS production before Odyssey. And, of course, after a few weeks of chasing anoms the "Can't Be Arsed" factor will climb steadily.
Miners will scatter to the wind in search of a system to mine. Far far away from any ice field. |
Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
204
|
Posted - 2013.05.11 00:59:00 -
[163] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Bling BlingBling wrote:Succubi & Phantasms. Guaranteed Pirate Cruisers are next up on the re balance schedule. The devs seemed to have no idea about those ships at fanfest. I'd be very surprised if they're boosted in the next 2-3 iterations. -Liang Also, keep in mind that these ships are insanely expensive and have little utility. Even if CCP buffs these ships, they are probably going to increase drop rates by quite a bit. |
Danni stark
216
|
Posted - 2013.05.11 11:12:00 -
[164] - Quote
Idol1 wrote:Miners will scatter to the wind in search of a system to mine. Far far away from any ice field.
considering the isk/hour difference between ice and ore, i'll wager they'll either mine ore until anoms respawn, or do something else, i doubt people will roam around looking for ice anoms.
especially in systems with multiple anoms where respawns will be as frequent as 2hrs or so due to multiple anoms spawning. Ice Mining Skill Plan. |
Idol1
IGI Purchasing
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 19:58:00 -
[165] - Quote
The question is where they are going to find ore to mine. Assuming most miners are going to mine ore when the ice is not up, how long before all the systems around an ice system are depleted?
So essentially people will go from AFK ice mining to flying around to find anything to mine at all? Gonna be rough. |
Kadl
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 20:47:00 -
[166] - Quote
Idol1 wrote:People mine ice exactly because it's easy money. Make it a PITA to mine ice and no one is going to mine ice. It just won't be worth it. You can make much more money mining ore even now that the ice is endless. Put a limit on the amount of ice combined with a 4 hour possible wait time and no one is going to touch the stuff.
Doesn't this just mean that the price of ice needs to rise to the levels of the price of ore? It seems like speculation as to how much of an increase is needed is already being done on the market, although they may be wrong (thus it is speculation). |
Drachiel
Mercury LLC
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 05:42:00 -
[167] - Quote
Navy Geddons will go up. I know of a few alliances seriously EFT warrioring Navy Geddon doctrines. |
Samroski
Games Inc. The Night Crew Alliance
216
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 19:51:00 -
[168] - Quote
I think this ice stuff is really a T2 BPO buff.
Increased POS running costs are likely to result in increased T2 production costs, and in better margins when producing off T2 BPOs.
I am aware that many T2 BPOs are collector items and never produced off. Still, the perception of better profits will only drive their price further up. The prices (in my perception) have doubled anyway over the last year, and no end appears in sight. Happiness is a warm gun, mama. |
Rain6637
Team Evil
1376
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 17:04:00 -
[169] - Quote
also: miners don't know wtf when it comes to scanning http://themittani.com/ | http://evenews24.com/ || Vincent Athena-á||-áflycatcher waaaaat |
Rain6639
Team Evil
679
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 03:22:00 -
[170] - Quote
gotta admit, it's unsettling that nobody has anything to say about my previous post. no trolling, or anything.
I wonder if this is one of those cases where I can't spot the fool. I have Thanatoses for sale, offering 250M finder's reward each. |
|
Samroski
Games Inc. The Night Crew Alliance
236
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 08:13:00 -
[171] - Quote
Rain6639 wrote:gotta admit, it's unsettling that nobody has anything to say about my previous post. no trolling, or anything.
I wonder if this is one of those cases where I can't spot the fool. I think model 6639 is definitely hotter and more likely to convince people to buy the ships.
I'm a capital ship noob (both flying and selling), thus my opinion may have little value, but generally it is easier to sell un-rigged ships. Rigging them before selling limits your clientele by a BIG percentage. There is generally no standard way of rigging ships, and everyone wants to do their own thing (though I have seen some carrier fits with CCCs).
Unless there has been a buff to this ship, or to drones, or other stuff that the ship uses, it may be difficult to convince people that your items are a good buy/investment post Odyssey.
Best of luck, and hope your plan works.
Happiness is a warm gun, mama. |
Rain6637
Team Evil
1388
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 14:21:00 -
[172] - Quote
you know, you're right.
I had a brilliant idea.
I'm going to scour killboards and look for T2 CCC fit thanny losses and ask if they'd be interested in a replacement. I have Thanatoses for sale, offering 250M finder's reward each. |
Samroski
Games Inc. The Night Crew Alliance
239
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 15:02:00 -
[173] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:you know, you're right. I had a brilliant idea. I'm going to scour killboards and look for T2 CCC fit thanny losses and ask if they'd be interested in a replacement. so do I get the cut? Any colour you like. |
Rain6637
Team Evil
1401
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 15:50:00 -
[174] - Quote
heck no! thankfully I thought of it before you did! I have Thanatoses for sale, offering 250M finder's reward each. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |