| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries
136
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 10:35:00 -
[31] - Quote
Gallamoth Sickle wrote:but can someone explain to me how/when eve became a gankers paradise in high sec? 2006 I think; might have been 2007. It was when the can flagging system was introduced. Up until that point Ore Theft (using a heavily expanded hauler) was the primary "danger" which miners had to deal with, suicide ganking was rare and generally focussed against known ore thieves or macro groups... That's right, the majority of suicide ganks (at least within the sphere I was aware of at the time) were defending the miners and their profits. Can flagging changed the dynamic however, and do you know who drove the development of that feature?
It was the miners.
Over the years since then the gankers have refined their techniques, developed new strategies and made it into a career. They've been "nerfed" several times (but have received buffs too).
Personally I feel that the barge buff went in the wrong direction, the tank levels are about right IMHO but the redesign should have enabled the fitting of tanks of that scale rather than building them into the hull - the gankers have always said "fit a tank" and most of those who listened to that sentiment (but not the specifics of deadspace boosters in highsec) seem to have fared relatively well out of it. |

Dave Stark
2561
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 10:36:00 -
[32] - Quote
Xen Solarus wrote:And ultimately their selfish actions prevent players natural progression out of highsec to other areas
do... do you actually believe this kind of nonsense, or are you trolling? |

Angelique Duchemin
Serenity Prime Kraken.
441
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 10:44:00 -
[33] - Quote
Xen Solarus wrote:Though i won't go as far as saying that ganking should be impossible in highsec, i definately think it should be made harder and/or less profitable.
It's already not profitable. They do it because it's fun. They spend their own ISK on their cheap gank ships to blow you up for a laugh.
You remember fun, right? It's what we used to have before we made MMOs a second job that we have to pay to perform.
If you want CCP to make ganking less fun then you're in for a rude awakening.
We miss you Saede. |

Domina Trix
McKNOBBLER DRINKING CLAN
35
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:07:00 -
[34] - Quote
Jacob Holland wrote:Gallamoth Sickle wrote:but can someone explain to me how/when eve became a gankers paradise in high sec? 2006 I think; might have been 2007. It was when the can flagging system was introduced. Up until that point Ore Theft (using a heavily expanded hauler) was the primary "danger" which miners had to deal with, suicide ganking was rare and generally focussed against known ore thieves or macro groups... That's right, the majority of suicide ganks (at least within the sphere I was aware of at the time) were defending the miners and their profits. Can flagging changed the dynamic however, and do you know who drove the development of that feature? It was the miners.Over the years since then the gankers have refined their techniques, developed new strategies and made it into a career. They've been "nerfed" several times (but have received buffs too). Personally I feel that the barge buff went in the wrong direction, the tank levels are about right IMHO but the redesign should have enabled the fitting of tanks of that scale rather than building them into the hull - the gankers have always said "fit a tank" and most of those who listened to that sentiment (but not the specifics of deadspace boosters in highsec) seem to have fared relatively well out of it.
I was around mining when they made that change, it was NOT the change miners were asking for. They wanted a way to protect their ore that they had mined from ore thieves so what did ccp do? introduce the flagging system so that unarmed mining vessels could shoot at ore thieves that made the whole situation worse. The only players on the forums that praised that new system were the ore thieves themselves because now they had a way of ganking miners without concord getting involved.
All they had to do was make secure anchorable containers capable of holding more than a packet of peanuts and the problem would have been solved. Two of the defining characteristics of a carebear are wanting other players to play the way the carebear wants and whining on the forums for the game to change when they don't. Yet I see more threads on these forums from gankers than I do miners whining about wanting the game changed to suit them. |

Sentamon
815
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:19:00 -
[35] - Quote
OP needs some cheeze with his whine. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Skeln Thargensen
Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp
97
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:26:00 -
[36] - Quote
Jacob Holland wrote:Personally I feel that the barge buff went in the wrong direction, the tank levels are about right IMHO but the redesign should have enabled the fitting of tanks of that scale rather than building them into the hull - the gankers have always said "fit a tank" and most of those who listened to that sentiment (but not the specifics of deadspace boosters in highsec) seem to have fared relatively well out of it.
what i found is that gankers shifted to ship scanning more after the changes and use multiple alts if required. Tanking may help if other players in system are untanked but if they want to get you they will because gankers aren't necessarily rational (in the sense that they're calculating profit). I've had a close call in a fairly well tanked Mackinaw versus two catalysts so while the tank obviously saved me it was no deterrent and I only survived because of the ganker's miscalculation (he tried to warp his third alt in but CONCORD popped him on arrival) freelance space bum |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
435
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:28:00 -
[37] - Quote
Get logi support, learn how to tank, stop farting around AFK ... imagine that. 
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1130
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:32:00 -
[38] - Quote
OP is a troll, and a poor one at that. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1130
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:35:00 -
[39] - Quote
Andski wrote:eve isn't fair, deal with it
So you no longer want production facilities in null to be as good as, or better than those in hi-sec, as 'eve isn't fair, deal with it'? This is not a signature. |

Dave Stark
2564
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:44:00 -
[40] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski wrote:eve isn't fair, deal with it So you no longer want production facilities in null to be as good as, or better than those in hi-sec, as 'eve isn't fair, deal with it'?
there's a difference between fair, and balanced. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7440
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:44:00 -
[41] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski wrote:eve isn't fair, deal with it So you no longer want production facilities in null to be as good as, or better than those in hi-sec, as 'eve isn't fair, deal with it'?
go pound sand while your exhumers get popped mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
1217
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:48:00 -
[42] - Quote
Gallamoth Sickle wrote:I get that no where in EVE is it truely safe and all that crap bla bla bla
but can someone explain to me how/when eve became a gankers paradise in high sec? I mean how is ok for someone to fly a ship worth a total of maybe 8-10 million take out somoene flying a ship worth 50m? I have read posts about people losing their orcas to ganks in high sec by several people all combined maybe flying ships that total 80-100 million (8-10 ships) or even less taking out a ship worth well over 1 bill full fitted? WTF?!?!
So i mean what defense is there? when orcas are dropped by a few well organized pilots flying cheap ships? I guess you could tank up your mackinaw but it only means what.... the ganker gets 2 of his friends to take out your 200mil ship by risking 10 mill a pilot?
I am all for ganks in high sec but the the cost to gank somoene is pennies on the dollar compared to what the ganked loses its just not fair at all.
This game just seems to be going down the toilet rapidly in the latest years. New players dont stand a chance agianst the EVE lifers that run multiple accounts and throw 10's of millions away on catalyst losses just to destroy people.
Let me say agian im not trying to complain about getting ganked rather i guess im complaining at the huge unfair cost diff of ships.
Why does CCP seem to have buffed destroyers creating a situation that favors the ganker and leaves the ganked almost completely defensless?
Even aligning to gate, mining in .7 and above, being at the computer, D-scanning constantly you still run a better chance of dieing than not if you find your self chosen by a ganker.
I know many trolls are gunna just tear this post a new one with the "eve isnt supposed be safe crap" but the fact that people create accounts just to gank ships with tech I ships that cost 5-10 times less then what it costs the person getting ganked. doesnt seem fair to me at all. and I feel it has caused many players to leave and will continue to do so.
"gankers paradise"? Uh maybe you need a reality check mate, because ganking is literally at an all time low thanks to the nerfs it's got over the last year or so
|

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
84
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:49:00 -
[43] - Quote
A thread I can be useful in, finally!
I'm a hardcore miner on an alt. We're talking, fly a makinaw, mining skills to 5, refinery skills to five, the whole nine yards. I also gank. Here is the ultimate solo guide to avoiding ganking in highspace.
Land on belt. Evaluate mineral that run across 28 meter wide "corridors" across the belt. Typically, you'll find yourself three lines, one up each arm of the belt, then one across the base (belts are "U" shaped). From those three straight lines, from off-grid bookmarks at the end of each line.
Now, for the complex part, miners! Form a second set of warp-ins on those lines, 12 meters from the beginning and end of that line you drew. Start mining at that warp-in, and slowboat across that line to your warp-out point. Stop, relock, and recycle onto new roids as they drop out of range. When you reach the end of the line, turn around and head back if it's safe. If not, warp out. continue watching Dscan.
Included is a crudely drawn MSpaint to show how.
crudely drawn MSpaint.
Since you're going at +75% speed for the vast majority of your runs, you will warp out instantly the second gankers hit grid. This is, if you are ATK. Don't worry miners, I'm here to help! If you care about making EVE better, you'll vote Psychotic Monk for CSM8. |

Harbonah
A-OK Logistics and Fabrication StoneGuard Alliance
30
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:50:00 -
[44] - Quote
I was going to offer to help the OP. Until I realized he had a CSP fee in the hundreds of millions of Isk for private communications. I find that morally offensive. *shrug*. I guess he doesn't want to socialize with people. |

Skeln Thargensen
Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp
97
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:58:00 -
[45] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Now, for the complex part, miners!
uh, yeah, very. I mean, well done for figuring this out but there are much easier and AFK friendly solutions. freelance space bum |

Dave Stark
2564
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 11:58:00 -
[46] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Now, for the complex part, miners! uh, yeah, very. I mean, well done for figuring this out but there are much easier and AFK friendly solutions.
we call it; the retriever. |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
84
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:05:00 -
[47] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Now, for the complex part, miners! uh, yeah, very. I mean, well done for figuring this out but there are much easier and AFK friendly solutions. we call it; the retriever.
We call those targets! Don't worry miners, I'm here to help! If you care about making EVE better, you'll vote Psychotic Monk for CSM8. |

Dave Stark
2564
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:13:00 -
[48] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Now, for the complex part, miners! uh, yeah, very. I mean, well done for figuring this out but there are much easier and AFK friendly solutions. we call it; the retriever. We call those targets!
you guys actually undock and do stuff? i thought you all spent your time docked in station fondling each other? |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
84
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:20:00 -
[49] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote: you guys actually undock and do stuff? i thought you all spent your time docked in station fondling each other?
Tell me more, I'm getting all hot and bothered here... Don't worry miners, I'm here to help! If you care about making EVE better, you'll vote Psychotic Monk for CSM8. |

Dave Stark
2564
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:22:00 -
[50] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Dave Stark wrote: you guys actually undock and do stuff? i thought you all spent your time docked in station fondling each other?
Tell me more, I'm getting all hot and bothered here...
no, i naturally assumed that's what you guys did since like... well... i don't know, i just assumed it was. *shrug* |

Skeln Thargensen
Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp
97
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:24:00 -
[51] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Now, for the complex part, miners! uh, yeah, very. I mean, well done for figuring this out but there are much easier and AFK friendly solutions. we call it; the retriever.
that is one yes. the other is not huddling up tot he other targets. freelance space bum |

Thorleifer
Yeti Cave
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:47:00 -
[52] - Quote
Ya this thread delivers.
If you want to mine in highsec get a skiff and tank the crap out of it. Even a Mack can have EHP of over 30k. If you make yourself more costly to gank than it takes to gank you then you won't be ganked. Tank your ship up and stop AFK mining and undoubtable you are alot less likely to get ganked.
That means D-SCAN and pay attention to local. I have no sympathy for anyone who AFK mines and fits no tank on his barge, they deserve to be ganked. CCP can't fix stupid and you guys are asking them to do just that. |

Angelique Duchemin
Serenity Prime Kraken.
444
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 13:00:00 -
[53] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:what i found is that gankers shifted to ship scanning more after the changes and use multiple alts if required. Tanking may help if other players in system are untanked but if they want to get you they will because gankers aren't necessarily rational (in the sense that they're calculating profit). I've had a close call in a fairly well tanked Mackinaw versus two catalysts so while the tank obviously saved me it was no deterrent and I only survived because of the ganker's miscalculation (he tried to warp his third alt in but CONCORD popped him on arrival)
Eh... High sec miners story of heroic survival in the face of adversity...
Does not deliver... We miss you Saede. |

Skeln Thargensen
Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp
97
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 13:03:00 -
[54] - Quote
Thorleifer wrote:Ya this thread delivers.
If you want to mine in highsec get a skiff and tank the crap out of it. Even a Mack can have EHP of over 30k. If you make yourself more costly to gank than it takes to gank you then you won't be ganked. Tank your ship up and stop AFK mining and undoubtable you are alot less likely to get ganked.
That means D-SCAN and pay attention to local. I have no sympathy for anyone who AFK mines and fits no tank on his barge, they deserve to be ganked. CCP can't fix stupid and you guys are asking them to do just that.
I've succesfully AFK mined for months on end in multiple locations with maxed out yield without issue. I've talked to other miners who've done this too.
gankers are as lazy as miners. they aren't going to roam all over high sec looking for you when there are plenty of easy targets who haven't yet learned to move. putting the effort into scouting out safer systems means you don't have to waste attention, or develop elaborate solutions to what is an uninvolving and boring activity.
I mean unless you really want to. freelance space bum |

Skeln Thargensen
Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp
97
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 13:05:00 -
[55] - Quote
Angelique Duchemin wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:what i found is that gankers shifted to ship scanning more after the changes and use multiple alts if required. Tanking may help if other players in system are untanked but if they want to get you they will because gankers aren't necessarily rational (in the sense that they're calculating profit). I've had a close call in a fairly well tanked Mackinaw versus two catalysts so while the tank obviously saved me it was no deterrent and I only survived because of the ganker's miscalculation (he tried to warp his third alt in but CONCORD popped him on arrival) Eh... High sec miners story of heroic survival in the face of adversity... Does not deliver...
oh it did. i picked up the killmail lol. freelance space bum |

Akiyo Mayaki
160
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 13:13:00 -
[56] - Quote
Miners can defend themselves. They choose not to.
But they'll come and whine to EVE-O nonetheless. No |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1130
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 13:32:00 -
[57] - Quote
Andski wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski wrote:eve isn't fair, deal with it So you no longer want production facilities in null to be as good as, or better than those in hi-sec, as 'eve isn't fair, deal with it'? go pound sand while your exhumers get popped
I do not mine.
Does that help? This is not a signature. |

Corey Fumimasa
Kiith Paktu Curatores Veritatis Alliance
261
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 13:39:00 -
[58] - Quote
Maybe CCP could make an Ore that isn't worth anything on the market, but that makes the miner immune to PVP. So If a barge is mining in a "xero ore" belt then it is invulnerable
This way miners could mine all they wanted with no risk. -áCorebloodbrothers & Ali Aras for CSM: Ring mining & bottom up income, new player balance, NRDS
|

Dave Stark
2565
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 15:23:00 -
[59] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:Maybe CCP could make an Ore that isn't worth anything on the market, but that makes the miner immune to PVP. So If a barge is mining in a "xero ore" belt then it is invulnerable
This way miners could mine all they wanted with no risk.
it's called spodumain. |

Daimon Kaiera
179
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 15:27:00 -
[60] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:Maybe CCP could make an Ore that isn't worth anything on the market, but that makes the miner immune to PVP. So If a barge is mining in a "xero ore" belt then it is invulnerable
This way miners could mine all they wanted with no risk.
I'd do it if 1000 m^3 of Xero ore refined into 1 trit. Here by talk start if go able? |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |