Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2540
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 06:29:00 -
[61] - Quote
Egg :D
Other recommended destinations for your future industrial adventures: Rancer, Amamake, Kamela, Aunenen.
Enjoy your stay!
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Katie Frost
Asgard. Exodus.
156
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:03:00 -
[62] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote: I was always under the impression that you had to have a somewhat serious commitment in personnel and firepower (tankpower) to go against sentry guns. I was always under the impression that this was essentially tanked battleships. I have read this and been told this on numerous occasions.
Your 'impressions' were wrong and whoever told you that Battleships and up are the only thing that can tank gate-guns was either very wrong or simply lying to you. Dare I say, that likewise your 'impression' about the function of gate-guns in low sec is wrong.
Beast of Revelations wrote: I would have been fine with dying if I'd seen a serious gatecamp with battleships and the whole 9 yards, because I don't expect to be able to survive that, and I don't expect sentry guns to be a big deterrent in that situation. But I'm not fine dying to a couple of jackoffs camping a gate in a couple of cruisers while being shot at by sentry guns, and the guns doing nothing to them.
Let me clarify something here for you, because you seem to like to use a lot of generalisations and sweeping statements; I understand that they seem to help you justify your stance and fuel your feelings regarding this matter:
You were attacked by a Heavy Assault Ship, Heavy Interdictor and a Force Recon Ship; an investment in excess of 600mil ISK. Although they are Cruiser-class ships, they are not really Cruisers in the terms you seem to imagine. The pirates deployed ~600mil worth of ships to catch a T1 Industrial ship worth less than 1% of that amount. I would call this a serious commitment to the gate-camp, wouldn't you?
Unlike the pirates, you did not commit to ensuring that you were transporting your goods safely through a less secure area of space. Instead of learning to use one of the many functions this game has to offer to ensure that your Bestower makes it safely to its destination, whether through low or 0.0 space, you chose to make an EVE:O topic to change a game mechanic. I hope that you understand why you received such a dismissive response from the community as a result.
There is nothing wrong with gate-guns. They are a deterrent to aggression not a preventative measure.
|

Herr Esiq
Dirt Nap Squad
26
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:12:00 -
[63] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:Sentient Blade wrote:If you walk into a large camp and get killed, so be it, but yes, for anything bigger than a cruiser, the gate guns are pretty ineffective. I just checked. It was 3 CRUISERS. No other ships involved. No 'anything bigger than a cruiser.' No 'large gate camp.' 3 cruisers can instagank an industrial and get off scott free in a 0.4sec covered in sentry guns. Good job CCP.
Quick tip, either fit a buffer on your indy and mwd-cloak back to gate or next gate, preferably a blockade runner. In one there should be almost 0 risk because you'll never encounter bubbles in low.
Cruisers and up take a fairly long time to lock, especially if you are a few km unlockable. They are also a bit slow. |

Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere
382
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:18:00 -
[64] - Quote
You lowsec guys moan about how people never leave highsec, whilst simultaneously defending your position on mercilessly owning them in gatecamps. Don't you realise this is the exact reason why lowsec is a wasteland? You are yourselves the cause of the problem. No wonder people have learned not to leave highsec, when you can just sit on a gate while they single file through to their doom. The risks of lowsec don't match the rewards. Not even slightly.
The whole point is to reinvigorate lowsec, make it an area in which highsec players are willing to risk traveling there to benifit increased reward for increased risk. Buffing gateguns gives them the possibility of getting a foot in the door of lowsec. This in turn, leads to more targets for pirates. The ONLY difference being, you won't be sitting there hitting your easy-mode button, but rather having to scan and hunt them down in system. You add a buff to lowsec resources, and now we're talking!
Of course, you all have a massive issue with this. I mean, why would you want to make EvE better if it effects your niche, right? Better to be selfish and maintain your L33T camps and moan about how highsec players are such carebears to not want to come and make pretty fireworks while you eat popcorn. Post with your main, like a BOSS! |

Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:28:00 -
[65] - Quote
Let me take a wild guess. The griefers who infest these low-sec shitholes are the same posters on this thread telling me sentry guns are fine, and that sentry guns were never meant to do much beyond tickle gate campers.
As to the second point, that's a damn lie because it has already been stated that CCP nerfed sentry guns to some sort of "ramp up" mechanic. So they apparently WERE meant to do more at some point.
As to just going and playing another game - yeah, I might very well do that. And if enough others decide the same, enjoy shooting asteroids or air or whatever. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2541
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:31:00 -
[66] - Quote
Xen Solarus wrote:You lowsec guys moan about how people never leave highsec, whilst simultaneously defending your position on mercilessly owning them in gatecamps. Don't you realise this is the exact reason why lowsec is a wasteland? You are yourselves the cause of the problem. No wonder people have learned not to leave highsec, when you can just sit on a gate while they single file through to their doom. The risks of lowsec don't match the rewards. Not even slightly.
1) it's not a wasteland for anyone looking for PVP, outside Amarr lowsec deserts fights are guaranteed, even TRUE SOLO pvp 2) it's a paradise for explorers as finding empty areas is easy 3) nobody except ******** hisec bears moves valuable stuff unscouted into known gate camp systems (99% of hi>low gates are uncamped)
Quote:The whole point is to reinvigorate lowsec, make it an area in which highsec players are willing to risk traveling there to benifit increased reward for increased risk. Buffing gateguns gives them the possibility of getting a foot in the door of lowsec. This in turn, leads to more targets for pirates. The ONLY difference being, you won't be sitting there hitting your easy-mode button, but rather having to scan and hunt them down in system. You add a buff to lowsec resources, and now we're talking!
hisec players willing to risk does not compute
Quote:Of course, you all have a massive issue with this. I mean, why would you want to make EvE better if it effects your niche, right? Better to be selfish and maintain your L33T camps and moan about how highsec players are such carebears to not want to come and make pretty fireworks while you eat popcorn.
If you'd really enjoy risk, taking care of yourself and reap the riches of lowsec, you'd live there, and not in boring hisec.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
673
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:32:00 -
[67] - Quote
Xen Solarus wrote:Buffing gateguns gives them the possibility of getting a foot in the door of lowsec. This in turn, leads to more targets for pirates. Is this really how things work? I'm not convinced. Oh god. |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
673
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:33:00 -
[68] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:As to just going and playing another game - yeah, I might very well do that. And if enough others decide the same, enjoy shooting asteroids or air or whatever. Aw, don't leave. We like shooting you. Oh god. |

Ai Shun
933
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:34:00 -
[69] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:As to just going and playing another game - yeah, I might very well do that. And if enough others decide the same, enjoy shooting asteroids or air or whatever.
This is a common mistake players make. EVE has been going strong for 10 years while fostering a wretched hive of scum and villainy where the strongest and smartest survive and prosper and the weak are destroyed, mashed up and spat out. You may feel that because it's not right for you the game is going downhill; but for those that enjoy the risk, the challenge and all the difficulties it represents the game will go on.
Good luck in whatever themepark you find yourself in. Hopefully the rides aren't too bumpy and you can simply coast your way to purples there. Remember to call yourself something catchy like "xxxDeathDealerxxx" or whatevs. |

Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:35:00 -
[70] - Quote
Quote:I hope that you understand why you received such a dismissive response from the community as a result.
Quit with the narcissism and hallucinations of grandeur. You don't represent any 'community.' You represent a handful of griefers who infest low-sec ratholes and who want to preserve game mechanics that benefit their asinine playstyle. Get over yourself. |
|

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
673
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:36:00 -
[71] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:Get over yourself. Tee hee. Oh god. |

Herr Esiq
Dirt Nap Squad
27
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:42:00 -
[72] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:Let me take a wild guess. The griefers who infest these low-sec shitholes are the same posters on this thread telling me sentry guns are fine, and that sentry guns were never meant to do much beyond tickle gate campers.
As to the second point, that's a damn lie because it has already been stated that CCP nerfed sentry guns to some sort of "ramp up" mechanic. So they apparently WERE meant to do more at some point.
As to just going and playing another game - yeah, I might very well do that. And if enough others decide the same, enjoy shooting asteroids or air or whatever. I personally dont grief on gates in lowsec, but im kinda meh no the whole issue of the sentry guns. It might feel lame when you get caught, but a lot of people risk averse in EVE. Recently we met a Navy Armageddon with 6 warp core stabs smartbombing on a gate. This was a flashy 'pirate' from a well known FW corp. He worked around the issue presented while trying not to lose his ship (we made him lose it anyway after some preperation). You should learn the mechanics of gate camping and if you insist on not flying a blockade runner of a ship without a large buffer check this video out, it will save your ass sometime:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVi1CWcbSUE
If the gate is spammed with drones/cans and probes hope you are fast enough. |

Djana Libra
The Black Ops S2N Citizens
141
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:55:00 -
[73] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:Quote:Scouts and/or support works wonders for keeping industrials alive in lowsec Not everyone has the luxury of support. Not everyone has the luxury of a massive corporation or alliance to help them play the game. No, some people have to do everything on their own, by themselves.
That is your choice again, you can find a corporation to join and get to know people that will help out. If you are trying to solo an MMO (go read up on what that actually means, specfically what the second M stands for) you shouldn't complain about dumb mistakes.
Also get a scout alt and you would have seen them, even possibly create a window to get trough.
|

Jassmin Joy
Fairlight Corp Rooks and Kings
100
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 07:56:00 -
[74] - Quote
So op jumped unscouted into a lowsec system, in a bestower, full of pi stuff. and is mad when there's a gatecamp?
also, There were meant to be some changes, but the changes they had were stupidly overpowered and didnt make sense, gate guns arent there to fight your battles for you, it's lowsec. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2541
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 08:01:00 -
[75] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:Quote:I hope that you understand why you received such a dismissive response from the community as a result. Quit with the narcissism and hallucinations of grandeur. You don't represent any 'community.' You represent a handful of griefers who infest low-sec ratholes and who want to preserve game mechanics that benefit their asinine playstyle. Get over yourself.
Actually, you are in the minority- the players who don't understand EVE or have even a basic idea how to play it.
Shooting spaceships in a PVP game is not asinine, your continuosly insulting tone in forum posting is.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Anunzi
High House Of Shadows Tribal Band
104
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 08:15:00 -
[76] - Quote
ACE McFACE wrote:You shouldn't be able to post if you lost a ship within 30 minutes
If I could click like more, I would.
Imagine if this was implemented, holy f*ck we'd see a massive drop in the "I did something utterly ******** and someone blew my expensive ship up, please make the bad people go away CCP" threads that populate this forum.
Malcanis for CSM8, Its about damn time.
A vote for Malcanis is a vote for bacon! |

Tauranon
Weeesearch
154
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 08:24:00 -
[77] - Quote
Xen Solarus wrote:You lowsec guys moan about how people never leave highsec, whilst simultaneously defending your position on mercilessly owning them in gatecamps. Don't you realise this is the exact reason why lowsec is a wasteland? You are yourselves the cause of the problem. No wonder people have learned not to leave highsec, when you can just sit on a gate while they single file through to their doom. The risks of lowsec don't match the rewards. Not even slightly.
highsec is for risk averse people. lowsec as it stands is also for risk averse people, so long as they take precautions, which include any of (a) flying a ship with sufficient hps to burn back to a gate (and not aggressing it when aggressed). (b) using a covops cloak ship - covops/bomber/recon/t3/blockade runner (c) having a gander at map stats before committing to a route. (d) using a scout, or pod/noobship scouting it yourself. (e) parking valueable ships in lowsec, and passing through the edge gates, to use the valuable ships in low population low, and then leaving them there for next time, instead of risking them in the pipes and border systems.
Quote:
The whole point is to reinvigorate lowsec, make it an area in which highsec players are willing to risk traveling there to benifit increased reward for increased risk. Buffing gateguns gives them the possibility of getting a foot in the door of lowsec. This in turn, leads to more targets for pirates. The ONLY difference being, you won't be sitting there hitting your easy-mode button, but rather having to scan and hunt them down in system. You add a buff to lowsec resources, and now we're talking!
All the gate gun does is stack the fight in your favour by 1 ship. All the gate gun x2 strength does is stack the fight in your favour by 2 ships. When you fight 3 vs indy you will still lose.
Quote:
Of course, you all have a massive issue with this. I mean, why would you want to make EvE better if it effects your niche, right? Better to be selfish and maintain your L33T camps and moan about how highsec players are such carebears to not want to come and make pretty fireworks while you eat popcorn.
Nobody thinks camps are leet, not even campers. However EVE allows for people to deny access to things (is a necessary facet of contention within the playerbase), lowsec makes it easier for people to deny you access to things, and camps are a necessary component of denying people access - ie all world pvp games have natural chokes. |

Sevastian Liao
DreamWeaver Inc.
59
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 08:33:00 -
[78] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:Quote:I hope that you understand why you received such a dismissive response from the community as a result. Quit with the narcissism and hallucinations of grandeur. You don't represent any 'community.' You represent a handful of griefers who infest low-sec ratholes and who want to preserve game mechanics that benefit their asinine playstyle. Get over yourself.
Just earlier this week the community was overwhelmingly supportive of a newbie who came in politely asking - in essence - whether he could do better in the game. Because he took responsibility for his own actions instead of blaming someone or something else for his mistakes.
So yes, take your own advice and get over yourself. |

Aida Nu
Nu Industries
53
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 08:49:00 -
[79] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:There isn't enough risk for stupid griefer pirates camping gates in these low-sec shitholes I have to pass through on occasion. Even small ships can tank the damage - some huge tank isn't required.
Buff the stupid sentry guns. There shouldn't be zero risk and 100% reward for these idiots. It's dumb.
That is all.
Hello Sir.
You are playing EVE Online. This is a game where you can and will be killed for doing stupid mistakes. If this is not your cup of tea, there are other games that might suit your risk free carebear needs.
ta ta o/ |

Anunzi
High House Of Shadows Tribal Band
104
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 08:56:00 -
[80] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote: Quit with the narcissism and hallucinations of grandeur. You don't represent any 'community.' You represent a handful of griefers who infest low-sec ratholes and who want to preserve game mechanics that benefit their asinine playstyle. Get over yourself.
Your attitude is appalling. You did something utterly moronic and lost a ship, you then come to the forums to DEMAND that the game is changed to compensate for your own stupidityGǪ but then you get all Gǣget over yourselfGǥ when people point out the truth.
Oh, and no I donGÇÖt live in lowsec. I live in sovnull before you start accusing me of being one of your GÇ£greifersGÇ¥
The only person round here who needs to get over themselves, is you sonny Jim.
Malcanis for CSM8, Its about damn time.
A vote for Malcanis is a vote for bacon! |
|

Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development Caldari Industrialist Association
83
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 09:07:00 -
[81] - Quote
ACE McFACE wrote:I still want to know why the OP was flying a t1 industrial through low-sec I fly T1 Industrials through lowsec... not enough skill points for anything else. I send a scout ahead and the T1 follows... I haven't been caught yet, but I will.
You use the tools you have.
|

Anunzi
High House Of Shadows Tribal Band
104
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 09:10:00 -
[82] - Quote
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:ACE McFACE wrote:I still want to know why the OP was flying a t1 industrial through low-sec I fly T1 Industrials through lowsec... not enough skill points for anything else. I send a scout ahead and the T1 follows... I haven't been caught yet, but I will. You use the tools you have.
Fair comment.
But the real question is, when the inevitable happens, will you deal with it and move on, or come to the forums and whine like a 12 year old for CCP to change games mechanics like the op??
Malcanis for CSM8, Its about damn time.
A vote for Malcanis is a vote for bacon! |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development Caldari Industrialist Association
84
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 09:25:00 -
[83] - Quote
Drunken Bum wrote: Getting caught by a gatecamp in this game is completely optional. Dont choose to get caught.
1. I would respond... yes it is optional (a good option). 2. I would say the opposite... get caught.
I think it is better for new players who may want to experience other parts of the game than highsec to go to lowsec early: with low value ships. Losing a ship should not be the end of the world. Learning about risk and reward is important.
The advise I have been given by multiple sources is for me to get my PvP combat toon 10 T1 frigates, fit them out, and then take them to lowsec and lose them all, but learn something for each loss.
A T1 is a cheap investment if knowledge is gained.
|

Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts Hegemonous Pandorum
143
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 09:27:00 -
[84] - Quote
To be honest, it's a bestower, laugh it off and buy a new one. Research a few alt routes and look on your map to see if there is any aggression in the low sec systems you are jumping into. Also, gate guns are working as intended. At least campers aren't reliably able to use instalocking frigates so they can fit more alpha into the camp. |

ACE McFACE
Radical Astronauts Plundering Eve Hopeless Addiction
1188
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 09:29:00 -
[85] - Quote
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:ACE McFACE wrote:I still want to know why the OP was flying a t1 industrial through low-sec I fly T1 Industrials through lowsec... not enough skill points for anything else. I send a scout ahead and the T1 follows... I haven't been caught yet, but I will. You use the tools you have. Difference between the OP and you is that you used the tools at your disposal to protect your cargo while the OP just yet "screw it! Its CCP's fault if I die" You should be notified if someone quotes your post so you can continue the argument! |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development Caldari Industrialist Association
84
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 09:30:00 -
[86] - Quote
Anunzi wrote:
But the real question is, when the inevitable happens, will you deal with it and move on, or come to the forums and whine like a 12 year old for CCP to change games mechanics like the op??
I already lost one a T1 in 0.0, plus a frigate I used as a fast courier in lowsec., and two pods in lowsec.
I think some game mechanics do need adjustment, but my losses were my mistakes.
|

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
675
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 09:31:00 -
[87] - Quote
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:I fly T1 Industrials through lowsec... not enough skill points for anything else. I send a scout ahead and the T1 follows... I haven't been caught yet, but I will.
You use the tools you have.
Same. I'm more paranoid about flying an indy through high sec than I am about flying it through low or null.
Oh god. |

IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
Wolfsbrigade Lost Obsession
332
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 09:33:00 -
[88] - Quote
How to ensure you will never be able to join a corp in eve #145: Making this thread.
Its taking increasing levels of self-deception to continue to convince myself that these threads are just dedicated trolls and that people aren't actually this stupid. Candy's Capital Shop |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development Caldari Industrialist Association
84
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 09:34:00 -
[89] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:There isn't enough risk for stupid griefer pirates camping gates in these low-sec shitholes I have to pass through on occasion. Even small ships can tank the damage - some huge tank isn't required.
Buff the stupid sentry guns. There shouldn't be zero risk and 100% reward for these idiots. It's dumb.
That is all. You lost a ship and cargo. You have paid in ISK... what did you learn?
Gategun suck? The aren't going to change today or tomorrow, what can you do differently to compensate? You have to change what you do to beat this situation. You are presented with a challenge.... how do you respond?
|

Anunzi
High House Of Shadows Tribal Band
104
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 09:35:00 -
[90] - Quote
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:Anunzi wrote:
But the real question is, when the inevitable happens, will you deal with it and move on, or come to the forums and whine like a 12 year old for CCP to change games mechanics like the op??
I already lost one a T1 in 0.0, plus a frigate I used as a fast courier in lowsec., and two pods in lowsec. I think some game mechanics do need adjustment, but my losses were my mistakes.
Exactly. I think the Op could learn a lot from your attitude Sir.
Malcanis for CSM8, Its about damn time.
A vote for Malcanis is a vote for bacon! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |