Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 13:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
If I were to sell the character, am I obliged to tell the buyer that the character already has a strike against it?
If I buy a character that already has a strike against it, how will I know?
Is it the character that has the strike or the account?
If it's the character can I clean the character by moving it to a fresh account?
If it's the Account can I clean the account by moving the characters on it to a fresh account?
Enquiring minds want to know. Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

Joxxy
Vrane Club
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 13:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
AFAIK - ban is connected to account. |

Thebriwan
LUX Uls Xystus
117
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 13:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
You should ask CCP per petition not this forum. |

Tuttomenui II
Aliastra Gallente Federation
103
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 13:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
It is the account that gets the strikes not the character. Not sure about the rest, but some type bans I hear not sure on this either they may ban all accounts associated with the same E-mail address if one of them is used for certain things and the others are not. |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 13:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Thebriwan wrote:You should ask CCP per petition not this forum.
Would save them a lot of petition time if they just answered it in public. Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

J'Poll
Kings of the Underground Side Effect.
2188
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 13:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
<3 the AP-0 ban tears all over the forum now.
When a WoW player leaves to return to WoW, the avg. IQ of both games rises. Request to CCP: Please patch stupidity out of the game for Winter 2013. Professional Forum Thread locker. |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tuttomenui II wrote:It is the account that gets the strikes not the character. Not sure about the rest, but some type bans I hear not sure on this either they may ban all accounts associated with the same E-mail address if one of them is used for certain things and the others are not.
On the day in question, I used AP0 on 2 different accounts, one was reprimanded, the other not. Both were used for about the same length of time. 18-20 jumps. All accounts are properly registered to one person on one email. So at least for this, on this occasion, they didn't go hog wild and shitcan the whole lot. Which would have sucked. Lesson learnt.
Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:00:00 -
[8] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:<3 the AP-0 ban tears all over the forum now.
Show me the tears. Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

Jarod Garamonde
Action Bastards
171
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:05:00 -
[9] - Quote
before this gets locked.... allow me to laugh at you, OP "you can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."-á --áBienator II |

Lexmana
946
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:Tuttomenui II wrote:It is the account that gets the strikes not the character. Not sure about the rest, but some type bans I hear not sure on this either they may ban all accounts associated with the same E-mail address if one of them is used for certain things and the others are not. On the day in question, I used AP0 on 2 different accounts, one was reprimanded, the other not. Both were used for about the same length of time. 18-20 jumps. All accounts are properly registered to one person on one email. So at least for this, on this occasion, they didn't go hog wild and shitcan the whole lot. Which would have sucked. Lesson learnt. If you learned your lesson it doesn't matter if this was a first strike or not. Right? |
|

Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
321
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:06:00 -
[11] - Quote
For botting, once you get a strike, you can no longer sell characters on that account - which means that it is impossible to buy characters that have a strike.
This probably applies to client modification bans as a rule, but I'm not 100% sure. Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Sometimes when I post, I look at my sig and wish that I'd follow my own god damned advice. |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:08:00 -
[12] - Quote
Lexmana wrote:Bloody Wench wrote:Tuttomenui II wrote:It is the account that gets the strikes not the character. Not sure about the rest, but some type bans I hear not sure on this either they may ban all accounts associated with the same E-mail address if one of them is used for certain things and the others are not. On the day in question, I used AP0 on 2 different accounts, one was reprimanded, the other not. Both were used for about the same length of time. 18-20 jumps. All accounts are properly registered to one person on one email. So at least for this, on this occasion, they didn't go hog wild and shitcan the whole lot. Which would have sucked. Lesson learnt. If you learned your lesson it doesn't matter if this was a first strike or not. Right?
Never say never mate.
Grey Azorria wrote:For botting, once you get a strike, you can no longer sell characters on that account - which means that it is impossible to buy characters that have a strike.
This probably applies to client modification bans as a rule, but I'm not 100% sure.
For real? Is that written somewhere? Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

Othran
Route One
498
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:15:00 -
[13] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:For real? Is that written somewhere?
Yes but I can't remember where . CCP changed the policy because (as predicted by anyone with a clue) people abused the character bazaar to get rid of characters with one strike.
Basically all your accounts are now unable to transfer characters - that's my recollection of the change.
At least you didn't get instantly permabanned on all accounts which is what would happen now for client modification. |

Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
321
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:16:00 -
[14] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:Grey Azorria wrote:For botting, once you get a strike, you can no longer sell characters on that account - which means that it is impossible to buy characters that have a strike.
This probably applies to client modification bans as a rule, but I'm not 100% sure. For real? Is that written somewhere? Yep, old Team Security devblog - and It looks like it applies to everyone who gets banned for something or another. Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Sometimes when I post, I look at my sig and wish that I'd follow my own god damned advice. |

Tlat Ij
Hedion University Amarr Empire
33
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:Tuttomenui II wrote:It is the account that gets the strikes not the character. Not sure about the rest, but some type bans I hear not sure on this either they may ban all accounts associated with the same E-mail address if one of them is used for certain things and the others are not. On the day in question, I used AP0 on 2 different accounts, one was reprimanded, the other not. Both were used for about the same length of time. 18-20 jumps. All accounts are properly registered to one person on one email. So at least for this, on this occasion, they didn't go hog wild and shitcan the whole lot. Which would have sucked. Lesson learnt. If you get permabanned, then CCP will ban all of your accounts. You should probably stop breaking the EULA/TOS before that happens. |

Prince Kobol
746
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:38:00 -
[16] - Quote
I am begging the ISD not to lock this thread as the OP butthurt for being caught cheating and being lowest of the low is priceless :) |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:42:00 -
[17] - Quote
Tuttomenui II wrote: If you get permabanned, then CCP will ban all of your accounts. You should probably stop breaking the EULA/TOS before that happens.
I appreciate your concern and will evaluate my future decisions on a case by case basis. I knew what I was doing and the consequences involved.
While my cheating ways really haven't changed that much since I was 16, I've been getting caught lately.
I must getting old and slow.
UO - Never Banned SWG - Never Banned WOW - Never Banned
SWTOR -Banned (couple of times) PS2 - Banned (many many times)
Now this.
Maybe I dodged a bullet, and need to have a good long hard look at myself.
Prince Kobol wrote:I am begging the ISD not to lock this thread as the OP butthurt for being caught cheating and being lowest of the low is priceless :)
Not sure you understand the term. My arse is fine thanks. Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

Gealbhan
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:44:00 -
[18] - Quote
Shoulda been perma banned, I've jettisoned used cargo containers that have more worth than you bots and hackers.  |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:46:00 -
[19] - Quote
Grey Azorria wrote:Bloody Wench wrote:Grey Azorria wrote:For botting, once you get a strike, you can no longer sell characters on that account - which means that it is impossible to buy characters that have a strike.
This probably applies to client modification bans as a rule, but I'm not 100% sure. For real? Is that written somewhere? Yep, old Team Security devblog - and It looks like it applies to everyone who gets banned for something or another.
Cheers. +1 for you. Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

Tuttomenui II
Aliastra Gallente Federation
104
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:55:00 -
[20] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3047915#post3047915
You know I am sure this applies to the question asked here as well. |
|

Jarod Garamonde
Action Bastards
171
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:58:00 -
[21] - Quote
So, basically, what I have gathered from this thread is that the tempban didn't do OP any good, and he/she fully intends to cheat, again and/or probably already is. Basically said "f**k the EULA, f**k CCP, and f**k the rest of the players... I'll clientmod if I damn well please"
Permaban him/her, now, CCP.... please? "you can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."-á --áBienator II |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 15:03:00 -
[22] - Quote
I've been on the wagon for 30 days.
Everyone has to start somewhere on the road to reformation. Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

J'Poll
Kings of the Underground Side Effect.
2189
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 15:09:00 -
[23] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:Tuttomenui II wrote:It is the account that gets the strikes not the character. Not sure about the rest, but some type bans I hear not sure on this either they may ban all accounts associated with the same E-mail address if one of them is used for certain things and the others are not. On the day in question, I used AP0 on 2 different accounts, one was reprimanded, the other not. Both were used for about the same length of time. 18-20 jumps. All accounts are properly registered to one person on one email. So at least for this, on this occasion, they didn't go hog wild and shitcan the whole lot. Which would have sucked. Lesson learnt.
So they should have banned both your accounts.
What in the world were you thinking that made it allowed.
Nobody will buy this character anyway with such post history....so good luck. When a WoW player leaves to return to WoW, the avg. IQ of both games rises. Request to CCP: Please patch stupidity out of the game for Winter 2013. Professional Forum Thread locker. |

Jarod Garamonde
Action Bastards
171
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 15:10:00 -
[24] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:I've been on the wagon for 30 days.
Everyone has to start somewhere on the road to reformation.
I said it in the other thread.... people like you are the reason I had to go and download all the trainers and hacks, back when Diablo, Command and Conquer, Unreal Tournament, and MechCommander were still popular, online. "Only cheat defensively", we used to say. Turning on all of those external cheat programs, just to keep someone from screwing with the game, was annoying. Nowdays, developers have watchdog programs that make it so people like me don't have to break the rules to hold back people like you.
Quit cheating, for good, or go back to singleplayer games. It's not that hard a concept. "you can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."-á --áBienator II |

Vaihto Ehto
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 15:13:00 -
[25] - Quote
Why werent these people banned for good, btw? Why would you not use an alt to post on the forums? |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
615
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 15:22:00 -
[26] - Quote
... waits for CCP to stop wasting time and resources, and simply accept the fact that the only solution is the "nuclear solution"... First Offense = Permaban.
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 15:24:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jarod Garamonde wrote:Bloody Wench wrote:I've been on the wagon for 30 days.
Everyone has to start somewhere on the road to reformation. I said it in the other thread.... people like you are the reason I had to go and download all the trainers and hacks, back when Diablo, Command and Conquer, Unreal Tournament, and MechCommander were still popular, online. "Only cheat defensively", we used to say. Turning on all of those external cheat programs, just to keep someone from screwing with the game, was annoying. Nowdays, developers have watchdog programs that make it so people like me don't have to break the rules to hold back people like you. Quit cheating, for good, or go back to singleplayer games. It's not that hard a concept.
Was it fun though in those other games? Doing the things you did 'defensively'?
AP0 wasn't for lolz, it was because the mechanism and game play sucked, and sucked so much that I was prepared to 'bend' the rules a little to not have to do it. I like EVE, if I didn't I wouldn't still be here after 7 years, or I'd be doing much much worse things in order to force the issue, and get myself inextricably banned for eternity.
Planetside 2 however was for the jollies. Holy hell I tell you, instagibbing aircraft was pissfunny and never got old. Some of the best battles was against other 'hackers' using the same stuff I was, real contest of wills. What did get old was the hoops you had to jump through to bypass their ban methods. Eventually I just stopped doing it.
Eve has much bigger fish to fry in the hacks/cheats/RMT arena than some silly 15000 range mod. AP0 was just for fanfest, like Unholy Rage. It's no coincidence it always happens right before fanfest. Big PR exercise to placate the masses and give the impression that something is being done. Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

Prince Kobol
746
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 15:30:00 -
[28] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:Jarod Garamonde wrote:Bloody Wench wrote:I've been on the wagon for 30 days.
Everyone has to start somewhere on the road to reformation. I said it in the other thread.... people like you are the reason I had to go and download all the trainers and hacks, back when Diablo, Command and Conquer, Unreal Tournament, and MechCommander were still popular, online. "Only cheat defensively", we used to say. Turning on all of those external cheat programs, just to keep someone from screwing with the game, was annoying. Nowdays, developers have watchdog programs that make it so people like me don't have to break the rules to hold back people like you. Quit cheating, for good, or go back to singleplayer games. It's not that hard a concept. Was it fun though in those other games? Doing the things you did 'defensively'? AP0 wasn't for lolz, it was because the mechanism and game play sucked, and sucked so much that I was prepared to 'bend' the rules a little to not have to do it. I like EVE, if I didn't I wouldn't still be here after 7 years, or I'd be doing much much worse things in order to force the issue, and get myself inextricably banned for eternity. Planetside 2 however was for the jollies. Holy hell I tell you, instagibbing aircraft was pissfunny and never got old. Some of the best battles were against other 'hackers' using the same stuff I was, real contest of wills. What did get old was the hoops you had to jump through to bypass their ban methods. Eventually I just stopped doing it. Eve has much bigger fish to fry in the hacks/cheats/RMT arena than some silly 15000 range mod. AP0 was just for fanfest, like Unholy Rage. It's no coincidence it always happens right before fanfest. Big PR exercise to placate the masses and give the impression that something is being done.
Yep... butthurt :)
|

Jarod Garamonde
Action Bastards
172
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 15:30:00 -
[29] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:Jarod Garamonde wrote:Bloody Wench wrote:I've been on the wagon for 30 days.
Everyone has to start somewhere on the road to reformation. I said it in the other thread.... people like you are the reason I had to go and download all the trainers and hacks, back when Diablo, Command and Conquer, Unreal Tournament, and MechCommander were still popular, online. "Only cheat defensively", we used to say. Turning on all of those external cheat programs, just to keep someone from screwing with the game, was annoying. Nowdays, developers have watchdog programs that make it so people like me don't have to break the rules to hold back people like you. Quit cheating, for good, or go back to singleplayer games. It's not that hard a concept. Was it fun though in those other games? Doing the things you did 'defensively'? AP0 wasn't for lolz, it was because the mechanism and game play sucked, and sucked so much that I was prepared to 'bend' the rules a little to not have to do it. I like EVE, if I didn't I wouldn't still be here after 7 years, or I'd be doing much much worse things in order to force the issue, and get myself inextricably banned for eternity. Planetside 2 however was for the jollies. Holy hell I tell you, instagibbing aircraft was pissfunny and never got old. Some of the best battles was against other 'hackers' using the same stuff I was, real contest of wills. What did get old was the hoops you had to jump through to bypass their ban methods. Eventually I just stopped doing it. Eve has much bigger fish to fry in the hacks/cheats/RMT arena than some silly 15000 range mod. AP0 was just for fanfest, like Unholy Rage. It's no coincidence it always happens right before fanfest. Big PR exercise to placate the masses and give the impression that something is being done.
No, it wasn't fun. The "easy button" is never fun, in games, or in real life. That's why I prefer to solo-hunt, when I PvP... I enjoy the game a lot more when I come out of a fight in hull, then in a 25-man gang where I helped kill 5 ships, and never got redboxed. "you can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."-á --áBienator II |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 15:32:00 -
[30] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:... waits for CCP to stop wasting time and resources, and simply accept the fact that the only solution is the "nuclear solution"... First Offense = Permaban.
I totally agree. Not just the one account either, every account attached to it. Also anyone running on a VM or through a proxy.
Don't care what the legitimate reasons are for proxy or VM, want to play EVE, don't do it. Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |
|

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 15:39:00 -
[31] - Quote
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
No, it wasn't fun. The "easy button" is never fun, in games, or in real life.
Then we'll just have to disagree. People can disagree, it's ok. I enjoy riding way too fast on public roads, and I can't tell you the amount of grief I get about that from friends and family. Ultimately it's my choice and I'll live with, or die by, the outcomes. Not everyone sees things the same way. We can't always help what we enjoy.
Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

Jarod Garamonde
Action Bastards
172
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 15:48:00 -
[32] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:Jarod Garamonde wrote:
No, it wasn't fun. The "easy button" is never fun, in games, or in real life.
Then we'll just have to disagree. People can disagree, it's ok. I enjoy riding way too fast on public roads, and I can't tell you the amount of grief I get about that from friends and family. Ultimately it's my choice and I'll live with, or die by, the outcomes. Not everyone sees things the same way. We can't always help what we enjoy.
Driving fast, IRL, is not the same as cheating in an MMO. I have an old Datsun that I've tweaked to over 400 horsepower. With my own hands. Think I don't know a thing or two about speed? You're not lessening everyone else's driving experience by having a faster ride than them (unless you're being a total pillock on the motorway, and directly endangering the other drivers). You ARE lessening other people's gaming experience when you cheat... and furthermore, people ragequit over cheaters. Every account that chucks the deuces is less income for CCP. "you can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."-á --áBienator II |

Malak Dawnfire
The Scope Gallente Federation
144
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:08:00 -
[33] - Quote
Did I miss something last night? AP0? Guessing a way to bypass the 15km or so autopilot travel distance before a warp? |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
1828
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:12:00 -
[34] - Quote
Applicable.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14326
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:12:00 -
[35] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:I enjoy riding way too fast on public roads, and I can't tell you the amount of grief I get about that from friends and family. Ultimately it's my choice and I'll live with, or die by, the outcomes. Good. Hopefully, they'll grief you into stop being an ass before the grief becomes real. Because ultimately, you're not the only one that will have to live or die by the outcome of your idiocy. GÇŁIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇĄ
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7903
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:19:00 -
[36] - Quote
Malak Dawnfire wrote:Did I miss something last night? AP0? Guessing a way to bypass the 15km or so autopilot travel distance before a warp?
The OP felt that he, unlike the rest of the playerbase, is exempt to the limitations put in place by the game developers. As a result, he and others were given 30 day suspensions to show them the error of their ways. mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
527

|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:23:00 -
[37] - Quote
The strike isn't against the character, it's against an "individual"(the owner of the account) as we can see it in our system.
If you sell the character, the owner does not inherit the strike. If you create a new account the strike does not transfer directly, but a GM will notice that you have an account which has done naughty things, and they will take that into account.
My suggestion would be to stay on the right side of the law from now on, and you'll be fine. An AP0 infraction is serious, mind you.
If you have any further or specific questions, I my recommendation will be to file a petition, and a GM can help you further  Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:24:00 -
[38] - Quote
Andski wrote:Malak Dawnfire wrote:Did I miss something last night? AP0? Guessing a way to bypass the 15km or so autopilot travel distance before a warp? The OP felt that he and 2300 others, are exempt to the limitations put in place by the game developers. As a result, he and others were given 30 day suspensions to show them the error of their ways.
FIXT Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:25:00 -
[39] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:The strike isn't against the character, it's against an "individual"(the owner of the account) as we can see it in our system. If you sell the character, the owner does not inherit the strike. If you create a new account the strike does not transfer directly, but a GM will notice that you have an account which has done naughty things, and they will take that into account. My suggestion would be to stay on the right side of the law from now on, and you'll be fine. An AP0 infraction is serious, mind you. If you have any further or specific questions, I my recommendation will be to file a petition, and a GM can help you further 
Cheers BigEars.
Oh and lift the bans? Since it's the 18th and all. It's your name on the ticket. I gotz me some autopiloting to do. Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2617
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:28:00 -
[40] - Quote
Gtfo, you won't be missed. |
|

Jarod Garamonde
Action Bastards
173
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:31:00 -
[41] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:The strike isn't against the character, it's against an "individual"(the owner of the account) as we can see it in our system. If you sell the character, the owner does not inherit the strike. If you create a new account the strike does not transfer directly, but a GM will notice that you have an account which has done naughty things, and they will take that into account. My suggestion would be to stay on the right side of the law from now on, and you'll be fine. An AP0 infraction is serious, mind you. If you have any further or specific questions, I my recommendation will be to file a petition, and a GM can help you further  Cheers BigEars. Oh and lift the bans? Since it's the 18th and all. It's your name on the ticket. I gotz me some autopiloting to do.
CCP didn't have to tempban you. You read the EULA. They could have permabanned you, in a number of ways... but they didn't. Ride out your ban until they are satisfied. Bothering them, and posting on the forums is probably only making them want to keep you tempbanned, longer. That's what I'd be doing to you... so I think it's safe to assume they are, too. "you can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."-á --áBienator II |
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
529

|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:33:00 -
[42] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:AP0 was just for fanfest, like Unholy Rage. It's no coincidence it always happens right before fanfest. Big PR exercise to placate the masses and give the impression that something is being done. Lets just address that once and for all.
At CCP we plan things before they can hit a live server. That involves, in this specific case:
- Initial idea
- Initial research to ensure task viability in this instance
- Planning of tasks
- Mapping it into a release
- Doing it
- Testing it
- Waiting for a deployment spot that's empty to decrease deployment risks
- Running in different activity states to slowly bring system only one piece at a time
- Analyzing data
- Deciding on what to do with the data
- Actually doing something with that data
The initial idea was created in the November/December time frame. From then on, it took until the point at which we banned the accounts in question to finish all of these steps. And when you have a project that takes this long, then you have an awfully high chance of the point where things are ready, given the fact we do 2 major releases every year. That means you have a 50% chance that things happen not long before fanfest. It's the nature of schedules.
Had we actively delayed it until fanfest, thus adding weeks from when we were ready till execution, then the argument would have been that we held it back to avoid upsetting people around fanfest. So yeah. Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|

Jayrendo Karr
Suns Of Korhal Terran Commonwealth
237
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:33:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ban the account before it can be traded. |
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
529

|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:34:00 -
[44] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:
Oh and lift the bans? Since it's the 18th and all. It's your name on the ticket. I gotz me some autopiloting to do.
That's all handled by a recurring database job. Most bans, depending on when they were applied, should be up by now. Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1011
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:38:00 -
[45] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:The strike isn't against the character, it's against an "individual"(the owner of the account) as we can see it in our system. If you sell the character, the owner does not inherit the strike. If you create a new account the strike does not transfer directly, but a GM will notice that you have an account which has done naughty things, and they will take that into account. My suggestion would be to stay on the right side of the law from now on, and you'll be fine. An AP0 infraction is serious, mind you. If you have any further or specific questions, I my recommendation will be to file a petition, and a GM can help you further 
how can you tell i am me?
credit card info?
ip
email? Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |

Anazzar
Howling Stones Mining Corporation
23
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 18:25:00 -
[46] - Quote
Odd that the OP was not perma-banned, would of considered this an ideal candidate but I guess CCP was lenient due to account age maybe? I dunno. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14327
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 18:30:00 -
[47] - Quote
Anazzar wrote:Odd that the OP was not perma-banned, would of considered this an ideal candidate but I guess CCP was lenient due to account age maybe? I dunno. GÇŞor maybe because the policy was 30 days on first strike, a lot longer on the second one?
GÇŁIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇĄ
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.-á |

Bloody Wench
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 01:50:00 -
[48] - Quote
Oh you cheeky bastards, pausing my training queue as well.
Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
221
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 02:41:00 -
[49] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:The strike isn't against the character, it's against an "individual"(the owner of the account) as we can see it in our system. If you sell the character, the owner does not inherit the strike. If you create a new account the strike does not transfer directly, but a GM will notice that you have an account which has done naughty things, and they will take that into account. My suggestion would be to stay on the right side of the law from now on, and you'll be fine. An AP0 infraction is serious, mind you. If you have any further or specific questions, I my recommendation will be to file a petition, and a GM can help you further  The sunglasses made that post all the more awesome
Also when you permaban his account can you hand me all his stuff |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1416
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 02:59:00 -
[50] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:The strike isn't against the character, it's against an "individual"(the owner of the account) as we can see it in our system. If you sell the character, the owner does not inherit the strike. If you create a new account the strike does not transfer directly, but a GM will notice that you have an account which has done naughty things, and they will take that into account. My suggestion would be to stay on the right side of the law from now on, and you'll be fine. An AP0 infraction is serious, mind you. If you have any further or specific questions, I my recommendation will be to file a petition, and a GM can help you further  how can you tell i am me? credit card info? ip email?
All of the above. Plus a number of other things. Remember, you're running their software, after all. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
|

Ecalos
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 04:44:00 -
[51] - Quote
I get it.. Despite all the "selective enforcement" years ago with the wt0 hack it was technically against the Eula... We get it, the 30 day ban was warranted- maybe an official statement or warning first- but that is neither here nor there. The problem I have is suspending game service, while still charging someone for it.. I used the aphack on one of my characters while the other five clients were open so they all got banned.. I was wrong and have learned the error of my ways... But paying $90 for thirty days of not bein able to play isn't right.. The training time is forever lost, but the right thing to do would be the game time being credited to the banned accounts... |

Jarod Garamonde
Action Bastards
177
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 04:51:00 -
[52] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:The strike isn't against the character, it's against an "individual"(the owner of the account) as we can see it in our system. If you sell the character, the owner does not inherit the strike. If you create a new account the strike does not transfer directly, but a GM will notice that you have an account which has done naughty things, and they will take that into account. My suggestion would be to stay on the right side of the law from now on, and you'll be fine. An AP0 infraction is serious, mind you. If you have any further or specific questions, I my recommendation will be to file a petition, and a GM can help you further  The sunglasses made that post all the more awesome Also when you permaban his account can you hand me all his stuff
I had first dibs, but I'll agree to split it with you, 50/50. Deal? "you can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."-á --áBienator II |

baltec1
Bat Country
6489
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 06:39:00 -
[53] - Quote
Ecalos wrote:I get it.. Despite all the "selective enforcement" years ago with the wt0 hack it was technically against the Eula... We get it, the 30 day ban was warranted- maybe an official statement or warning first- but that is neither here nor there. The problem I have is suspending game service, while still charging someone for it.. I used the aphack on one of my characters while the other five clients were open so they all got banned.. I was wrong and have learned the error of my ways... But paying $90 for thirty days of not bein able to play isn't right.. The training time is forever lost, but the right thing to do would be the game time being credited to the banned accounts...
No the right thing to do is to not cheat in the first place. |

Azeroth Uluntil
e X i l e The Initiative.
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 07:30:00 -
[54] - Quote
Ecalos wrote:I get it.. Despite all the "selective enforcement" years ago with the wt0 hack it was technically against the Eula... We get it, the 30 day ban was warranted- maybe an official statement or warning first- but that is neither here nor there. The problem I have is suspending game service, while still charging someone for it.. I used the aphack on one of my characters while the other five clients were open so they all got banned.. I was wrong and have learned the error of my ways... But paying $90 for thirty days of not bein able to play isn't right.. The training time is forever lost, but the right thing to do would be the game time being credited to the banned accounts...
Definitely not. If your account was banned, you should still run through your time as per normal. If you charge back the time, keep the account banned until said time is paid. You paid to use a service, you screwed up and cheated somehow, you should be punished to the full extent possible.
Suck it up princess. |

Lexmana
947
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 07:41:00 -
[55] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:Andski wrote:Malak Dawnfire wrote:Did I miss something last night? AP0? Guessing a way to bypass the 15km or so autopilot travel distance before a warp? The OP felt that he and 2300 others, are exempt to the limitations put in place by the game developers. As a result, he and others were given 30 day suspensions to show them the error of their ways. FIXT I bet you that the ***** used the same kind of rationalisation for their actions during the war ... |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
670
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 09:32:00 -
[56] - Quote
Ecalos wrote:I get it.. Despite all the "selective enforcement" years ago with the wt0 hack it was technically against the Eula... We get it, the 30 day ban was warranted- maybe an official statement or warning first- but that is neither here nor there. The problem I have is suspending game service, while still charging someone for it.. I used the aphack on one of my characters while the other five clients were open so they all got banned.. I was wrong and have learned the error of my ways... But paying $90 for thirty days of not bein able to play isn't right.. The training time is forever lost, but the right thing to do would be the game time being credited to the banned accounts...
All of your accounts should have been permanently banned. Don't be a cheating scumbag, because if you are a cheater once, chances are, you are a cheater for life. R Tape loading error |

Xayder
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
256
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 09:34:00 -
[57] - Quote
in short, you are focked
Can I HaZ YouR StuFf ? I don't always post, But when i post I do it with my main |

Kusanagi Kasuga
Ferocious Felines
62
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 09:41:00 -
[58] - Quote
Really hope this topic is being considered as evidence, because the OP looks anything but contrite - making excuses, asking how much trouble they'd get in if they did it again, asking if there's a way to remove the black mark...
The crap you admit to doing ruins games and the only reason CCP should give you any leeway is in case you learn your lesson - and given you've been repeatedly banned from many games for cheating, you're not going to learn and you should be asked to leave ne'er to return. |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
209
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 12:49:00 -
[59] - Quote
CCP should just perma ban you and give away all your posetions to a charity in real money!
 |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
617
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 13:03:00 -
[60] - Quote
When I think of bans, I like to remember my days on the oil rigs and what we did to cheaters in some of our poker games.
It was like "banning", but with more a more personal touch. 
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |
|

Bloody Wench
359
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 14:55:00 -
[61] - Quote
Kusanagi Kasuga wrote:Really hope this topic is being considered as evidence, because the OP looks anything but contrite - making excuses, asking how much trouble they'd get in if they did it again, asking if there's a way to remove the black mark...
The crap you admit to doing ruins games and the only reason CCP should give you any leeway is in case you learn your lesson - and given you've been repeatedly banned from many games for cheating and intentionally ruining the game experience of honest players, you're not going to learn and you should be asked to leave ne'er to return.
I've done my time, paid my penance. How long are you going to persecute after the criminal has repaid their debt to society?
I was punished as CCP saw fit. I've served that time.
If you don't think that punishment was severe enough perhaps you can write to your senator. Maybe I should be put on some no fly list, or offender register so I can never get another job. Maybe men in balaklava should storm my computer room with automatic weapons and ship me off to Gitmo without trial.
I'm not going to indulge you further. Done my time, account is back up and running, got the answers I was looking for, and I'm off about my business.
Cheers all was fun.
Support a Hi Resolution Texture Pack |

baltec1
Bat Country
6499
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 15:07:00 -
[62] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:
I've done my time, paid my penance. How long are you going to persecute after the criminal has repaid their debt to society?
I was punished as CCP saw fit. I've served that time.
If you don't think that punishment was severe enough perhaps you can write to your senator. Maybe I should be put on some no fly list, or offender register so I can never get another job. Maybe men in balaklava should storm my computer room with automatic weapons and ship me off to Gitmo without trial.
I'm not going to indulge you further. Done my time, account is back up and running, got the answers I was looking for, and I'm off about my business.
Cheers all was fun.
As you can tell, one of the few things that unites everyone around here is an intolerance of cheating scum. Everyone gets a second chance unless you are RMT scum but blow that and we will show no mercy and will support CCP fully in showing even less. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
8289
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 15:10:00 -
[63] - Quote
Ecalos wrote:I get it.. Despite all the "selective enforcement" years ago with the wt0 hack it was technically against the Eula... We get it, the 30 day ban was warranted- maybe an official statement or warning first- but that is neither here nor there. The problem I have is suspending game service, while still charging someone for it.. I used the aphack on one of my characters while the other five clients were open so they all got banned.. I was wrong and have learned the error of my ways... But paying $90 for thirty days of not bein able to play isn't right.. The training time is forever lost, but the right thing to do would be the game time being credited to the banned accounts... Why should CCP credit paid for gametime to a player that has been banned for breaking the EULA? Consider it a fine or penalty for being a cheat.
CCP make it very clear that cheating will not be tolerated, your use of the AP to zero exploit, which I believe requires the injection of code and is therefore client modification, should really have been a permaban offence. Your actions in Eve have consequences, if you can't stomach that then this is not the game you are looking for. Personally I think that the actions taken by CCP are pretty lenient. A war hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
539

|
Posted - 2013.05.19 16:19:00 -
[64] - Quote
I will remind all of you that the 30 day bans for the autopilot to zero hack was a one-off thing. Anybody caught doing that now gets a permanent ban right off the bat. Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2188

|
Posted - 2013.05.19 16:48:00 -
[65] - Quote
I have removed an off topic post. Please keep it on topic and civil. Thank you. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
802
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 17:18:00 -
[66] - Quote
Did these bans not come with a "no-transfer" character flag? You seem to imply they didn't get it. |
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
540

|
Posted - 2013.05.19 17:21:00 -
[67] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:Did these bans not come with a "no-transfer" character flag? You seem to imply they didn't get it. You're correct. They didn't.  Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7910
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 17:27:00 -
[68] - Quote
ap-zero cheaters would like to believe that they are different from botters and gold sellers - the lepers and convicts of the mmo world - because they convince themselves that their cheating is "harmless"
the truth is that they are no different and that they should be treated the same as botters and gold sellers, because when they get their comeuppance they show no remorse and only complain, and instead of playing the game like the rest of us they will only change their methodology and attempt to evade detection
i bet 90% of those 2300 or whatever will continue using similar cheats mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |

Othran
Route One
500
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 18:15:00 -
[69] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:Did these bans not come with a "no-transfer" character flag? You seem to imply they didn't get it. You're correct. They didn't. 
When did the policy change?
Last I heard if you got a warning or temp ban then the accounts were locked down so characters couldn't be transferred.
I obviously missed something..... |

ElQuirko
Jester Syndicate S0UTHERN C0MF0RT
1320
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 18:33:00 -
[70] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:I am begging the ISD not to lock this thread as the OP butthurt for being caught cheating and being lowest of the low is priceless :) Not sure you understand the term. My arse is fine thanks.
No, I agree with the quotee, your rump seems almost certainly rustled. It's indicated by your planning to jettison your character. Save the Domi model! Spacewhales should be preserved. |
|

ElQuirko
Jester Syndicate S0UTHERN C0MF0RT
1320
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 18:34:00 -
[71] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:Did these bans not come with a "no-transfer" character flag? You seem to imply they didn't get it. You're correct. They didn't. 
Can those of us who don't cheat and like to believe that the wrath of CCP is as harsh as Guard likes to claim have an explanation as to why not? Surely you want your deterrent to be strong? Seems to me like these cheaters got away scot-free. Makes me almost want to try it... Save the Domi model! Spacewhales should be preserved. |

Alexa Coates
Federation Navy Assembly Group LLC
560
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 18:42:00 -
[72] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:Tuttomenui II wrote: If you get permabanned, then CCP will ban all of your accounts. You should probably stop breaking the EULA/TOS before that happens.
I appreciate your concern and will evaluate my future decisions on a case by case basis. I knew what I was doing and the consequences involved. While my cheating ways really haven't changed that much since I was 16, I've been getting caught lately. I must be getting old and slow. UO - Never Banned SWG - Never Banned WOW - Never Banned SWTOR -Banned (couple of times) PS2 - Banned (many many times) Now this. Maybe I dodged a bullet, and need to have a good long hard look at myself. Prince Kobol wrote:I am begging the ISD not to lock this thread as the OP butthurt for being caught cheating and being lowest of the low is priceless :) Not sure you understand the term. My arse is fine thanks.
so you're one of THOSE assholes who literally cannot play a game without cheats? Please, by all means, pick up a knife, and jam it into your jugular.
That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers. |

Rakshasa Taisab
Sane Industries Inc.
1171
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 18:49:00 -
[73] - Quote
But will you ban people using the AP100 exploit? Nyan |
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
544

|
Posted - 2013.05.19 18:56:00 -
[74] - Quote
Othran wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:Did these bans not come with a "no-transfer" character flag? You seem to imply they didn't get it. You're correct. They didn't.  When did the policy change? Last I heard if you got a warning or temp ban then the accounts were locked down so characters couldn't be transferred. I obviously missed something..... That is only true for our bot detection systems. In this case, given that the accounts that we could tell did other bad stuff were permanently banned, we did not have concerns about people moving characters to avoid "strikes" as we did with our war on bots.
That could have been a mistake. Who knows. But it was decided not to apply that restriction, because we didn't see a good reason to do so. Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
544

|
Posted - 2013.05.19 18:58:00 -
[75] - Quote
ElQuirko wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:Did these bans not come with a "no-transfer" character flag? You seem to imply they didn't get it. You're correct. They didn't.  Can those of us who don't cheat and like to believe that the wrath of CCP is as harsh as Guard likes to claim have an explanation as to why not? Surely you want your deterrent to be strong? Seems to me like these cheaters got away scot-free. Makes me almost want to try it... Because the issue of bots and client modification, while heavily overlapping and related, are distinct issues in this specific case. In the case of bots, a no-transfer flag makes sense, as our data showed. But for this one-off action, we have better deterrents. Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
544

|
Posted - 2013.05.19 18:59:00 -
[76] - Quote
Rakshasa Taisab wrote:But will you ban people using the AP100 exploit? I don't care if you modified your client to autopilot to 0km or 100km. It violates the EULA. So yes. Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|

baltec1
Bat Country
6507
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 19:45:00 -
[77] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:Othran wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:Did these bans not come with a "no-transfer" character flag? You seem to imply they didn't get it. You're correct. They didn't.  When did the policy change? Last I heard if you got a warning or temp ban then the accounts were locked down so characters couldn't be transferred. I obviously missed something..... That is only true for our bot detection systems. In this case, given that the accounts that we could tell did other bad stuff were permanently banned, we did not have concerns about people moving characters to avoid "strikes" as we did with our war on bots. That could have been a mistake. Who knows. But it was decided not to apply that restriction, because we didn't see a good reason to do so.
Given that in future you will be perma banning people for this its a bit of a moot point. Although I too would haved to have seen them locked down. |

Dub Step
Death To Everyone But Us
79
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 20:10:00 -
[78] - Quote
ElQuirko wrote:Can those of us who don't cheat and like to believe that the wrath of CCP is as harsh as Guard likes to claim have an explanation as to why not? Surely you want your deterrent to be strong? Seems to me like these cheaters got away scot-free. Makes me almost want to try it... Lolol honest players tears amirite? 
Joking aside; CCP have already explained their rulings on this issue in some detail. Try reading devblogs and announcements in future. |

Dub Step
Death To Everyone But Us
79
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 20:19:00 -
[79] - Quote
Alexa Coates wrote:so you're one of THOSE assholes who literally cannot play a game without cheats? Please, by all means, pick up a knife, and jam it into your jugular.
Your.
Condemn someone for using cheats in a videogame if it's that important to you, but to will them to commit suicide in real life is just disgusting. I suggest you get a grip on life. |
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
547

|
Posted - 2013.05.19 20:51:00 -
[80] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: Given that in future you will be perma banning people for this its a bit of a moot point. Although I too would have liked to have seen them locked down.
That's a fair point and your opinion is definitely appreciated. We'll keep that in mind for the future if similar circumstances should arise  Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|
|

Arec Bardwin
948
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 20:59:00 -
[81] - Quote
Bloody Wench wrote:I've been on the wagon for 30 days. Careless prediction: soon to become a bannedwagon.
|

Danni stark
306
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 21:02:00 -
[82] - Quote
Dub Step wrote:Alexa Coates wrote:so you're one of THOSE assholes who literally cannot play a game without cheats? Please, by all means, pick up a knife, and jam it into your jugular.
Your. Condemn someone for using cheats in a videogame if it's that important to you, but to will them to commit suicide in real life is just disgusting. I suggest you get a grip on life.
"so you are one of" is right, therefore it's you're. not your. Ice Mining Skill Plan. |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
802
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 21:52:00 -
[83] - Quote
be smart: deal with the horrors of empire hauling by paying pubbies literally less than a cent's worth of isk per jump |
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2188

|
Posted - 2013.05.19 22:50:00 -
[84] - Quote
I've removed an off topic post. Please keep it on topic and civil. Thank you. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
8303
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 23:01:00 -
[85] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:be smart: deal with the horrors of empire hauling by paying pubbies literally less than a cent's worth of isk per jump Then find out that you didn't put enough collateral in the contract, which was picked up by a (insert "terribad, scammers, nullsec, all of the preceding" corp of choice) alt, and all your stuff is now gone 
Seriously though people will move your stuff for a pittance, check out Red Frog, PushX or any of their competitors. A war hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |