| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Victoria Sin
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
139
   |
Posted - 2013.05.23 23:36:00 -
[61] - Quote
I bought and pimped out a T3 for C3 WH mostly but sometimes use it in HS sites just for fun. No big deal if I can't do that anymore. Ishtar will do fine.
|
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
Aegis Solaris
1890
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 16:19:00 -
[62] - Quote
Sigh. In high sec I use a swiss army knife fit Proteus. Probe launcher, salvager, code breaker, analyzer, and sufficient dps and tank to do all radar, mag and combat sites.
I hope I can fit up a HAC to do the same. If not its going to have to be an alt in an Orca following me around so I can grab whatever ship is needed .
http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate
Villore Accords
101
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 16:57:00 -
[63] - Quote
Mag and radar sites aren't worth it in hisec, just fit a sleipnir for blitzing those 4/10s and keep pissing off the noobs. |
Drunken Bum
341
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 18:26:00 -
[64] - Quote
This change is pointless. An ishtar runs the sites just as fast. The problem isn't the ships its the sites themselves. As has been said many times before. This changes nothing.
Spare some change?-á |
Amakish
EVE University
Ivy League
4
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 16:29:00 -
[65] - Quote
this is a stupid change...
doesnt solve the issue....
change the sites instead.... make just make a random ship trigger or make it a requirement to clear the entire room for the "loot pinata" to spawn end of story....
my issue is that now i cant have 1 ship for 3/10 and 4/10... either i have to go drake and ignore all 3/10 which suck or i have to some with something silly like a vexor and spend 10000 years doing the site and have someone come in a take the site? wasnt that what they wanted to remove?
i guess i should jsut train another cruiser to V and do sacriledge.... and use my alt for scanning down the sites.... |
Narwz
Zerglingz United
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 18:53:00 -
[66] - Quote
It's silly that this change affects low sec 4/10. I somewhat understand reasoning about change to high sec, but there isn't any logical explanation why should it ban T3 from low sec DED's. |
Zircon Dasher
208
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 19:46:00 -
[67] - Quote
Narwz wrote:It's silly that this change affects low sec 4/10. I somewhat understand reasoning about change to high sec, but there isn't any logical explanation why should it ban T3 from low sec DED's.
(1) T3 are overpowered for highsec 4/10's
(2) Lowsec 4/10 sites are exactly the same as highsec 4/10
tf
(3) T3 are overpowered for lowsec 4/10's
Pretty logical.
Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'. |
Narwz
Zerglingz United
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 20:42:00 -
[68] - Quote
Yeah, the slight difference is that you can actually lose that T3 in low sec. |
SFM Hobb3s
Vanguard Frontiers
Black Legion.
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 21:00:00 -
[69] - Quote
Well it certainly has made a change. Doubtful its what ccp was hoping for tho. 4/10's are definitely not the place for 'noobz'
Thus far I've found 4 4/10's. In HALF of those I've engaged in PVP. The one time I didn't get to loot the can, I killed the guy who did.
Yay for suspect status!!! Here's some RF EMP to lighten your day :) |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |