EVE Search - New drones, modules and what not

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 42 post(s)
Gierling	Posted - 2005.10.31 19:33:00 - [1] Imho, I think that any case where the "halving" would make an unusable number that you err in favor of an extra drone. Say ships with a 25 drone bay, since 12.5 would be useless just make them 15. And Grimpak, I believe that sentry drones need to be anchored. Which makes a Dominix a portable gatecamp. snip That's not very appropriate. - Teblin
Gierling Gallente Celestial Fleet	Posted - 2005.10.31 19:33:00 - [2] Imho, I think that any case where the "halving" would make an unusable number that you err in favor of an extra drone. Say ships with a 25 drone bay, since 12.5 would be useless just make them 15. And Grimpak, I believe that sentry drones need to be anchored. Which makes a Dominix a portable gatecamp.
Gierling	Posted - 2005.10.31 22:49:00 - [3] I actually think that if you want to salvage this for the Domi and veor and the like, ignore the damage output part of the equation and focus on versatility. Such as giving the domi a bonus to Drone max speed, and drone hitpoints. Although I do think it would be best to just let it control 10 drones with the new changes. snip That's not very appropriate. - Teblin
Gierling Gallente Celestial Fleet	Posted - 2005.10.31 22:49:00 - [4] I actually think that if you want to salvage this for the Domi and veor and the like, ignore the damage output part of the equation and focus on versatility. Such as giving the domi a bonus to Drone max speed, and drone hitpoints. Although I do think it would be best to just let it control 10 drones with the new changes.
Gierling	Posted - 2005.11.01 00:34:00 - [5] Nafri, think of the sentries taking into account the new skills (Including the domis thermal bonus). Plus the new modules (assuming they are lowslot modules). I think the Domi just became a blockade ship and I am utterly serious. snip That's not very appropriate. - Teblin
Gierling Gallente Celestial Fleet	Posted - 2005.11.01 00:34:00 - [6] Nafri, think of the sentries taking into account the new skills (Including the domis thermal bonus). Plus the new modules (assuming they are lowslot modules). I think the Domi just became a blockade ship and I am utterly serious.
Gierling	Posted - 2005.11.01 02:46:00 - [7] Tuxford, I do think you need to consider the redundancy between heavy drone operation and drone interfacing. Maybe make heavy drone operations add optimal or something like that. snip That's not very appropriate. - Teblin
Gierling Gallente Celestial Fleet	Posted - 2005.11.01 02:46:00 - [8] Tuxford, I do think you need to consider the redundancy between heavy drone operation and drone interfacing. Maybe make heavy drone operations add optimal or something like that.
Gierling	Posted - 2005.11.01 03:27:00 - [9] Still you run into the problem where you have two skills of equal ranking affecting the same attribute, by significantly different amounts. snip That's not very appropriate. - Teblin
Gierling Gallente Celestial Fleet	Posted - 2005.11.01 03:27:00 - [10] Still you run into the problem where you have two skills of equal ranking affecting the same attribute, by significantly different amounts.
Gierling	Posted - 2005.11.01 06:09:00 - [11] Farjung, assuming one average BS (IE with one sensor booster), can you run the math on how many dampeners you need to ensure they will never lock you before 5 drones jam them once. I'm thinking thats the wicked combo right there. snip That's not very appropriate. - Teblin
Gierling Gallente Celestial Fleet	Posted - 2005.11.01 06:09:00 - [12] Farjung, assuming one average BS (IE with one sensor booster), can you run the math on how many dampeners you need to ensure they will never lock you before 5 drones jam them once. I'm thinking thats the wicked combo right there.
Gierling	Posted - 2005.11.01 18:50:00 - [13] Edited by: Gierling on 01/11/2005 18:50:40 As far as sentry drones. I think they should be anchorable to prevent abuse. They function as normal drones in a pinch but turn into sentries once anchored. I also agree that the drone carriers would be best at around 7 drones, but I'm damned if I know a fair way of getting them to that point. Maybe a racial bonus? Give all Gallente Characters +2 drones controlled. (Yes I know thats a horrible Idea, I just like seeing people complain) snip That's not very appropriate. - Teblin
Gierling Gallente Celestial Fleet	Posted - 2005.11.01 18:50:00 - [14] Edited by: Gierling on 01/11/2005 18:50:40 As far as sentry drones. I think they should be anchorable to prevent abuse. They function as normal drones in a pinch but turn into sentries once anchored. I also agree that the drone carriers would be best at around 7 drones, but I'm damned if I know a fair way of getting them to that point. Maybe a racial bonus? Give all Gallente Characters +2 drones controlled. (Yes I know thats a horrible Idea, I just like seeing people complain)

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.