EVE Search - New drones, modules and what not

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 42 post(s)
Skulmar	Posted - 2005.11.03 20:07:00 - [1] i havnt read the all the posts (its simply too much) so if this question has already been answered plz give me a link: did anyone think about reducing the signature radius of drones as a drone controlle bonus of the ishtar, domi..(or even for all drones) instead of or in conjunction with increasing the hp? it would increase targeting time, make them tougher and smart bombs would also be still usefull, so it would be more similar to the current system. with the hp increasing system SB will get quite useless or at least far less effective then now.
Skulmar	Posted - 2005.11.03 20:07:00 - [2] i havnt read the all the posts (its simply too much) so if this question has already been answered plz give me a link: did anyone think about reducing the signature radius of drones as a drone controlle bonus of the ishtar, domi..(or even for all drones) instead of or in conjunction with increasing the hp? it would increase targeting time, make them tougher and smart bombs would also be still usefull, so it would be more similar to the current system. with the hp increasing system SB will get quite useless or at least far less effective then now.
Skulmar	Posted - 2005.11.03 21:00:00 - [3] @ Kaell: any idea why? i made a post in the last 2 dev blogs and it allways gets completly ignored even by devs. to me it looks much better then simply increasing the hp.
Skulmar	Posted - 2005.11.03 21:00:00 - [4] @ Kaell: any idea why? i made a post in the last 2 dev blogs and it allways gets completly ignored even by devs. to me it looks much better then simply increasing the hp.
Skulmar	Posted - 2005.11.04 16:44:00 - [5] ok seems like some people still dont get it. 1. the reason why all the domi users are complaining is that if the drone patch is realy not intended as a drone carrier nerf, drone carriers should get an effectiveness bonus to all drone types, cause else they wont benefit as much from the patch as other ships which is the same as a nerf. WHY? because if they would introduce the new drones with the current 15 drones system, drone carriers would be 50% better in useing them (cause of 50% more drones in space). with the current layout of the patch they wont have this bonus so its a nerf, because if the patch is only for reducing the drone numbers there is no reason why they should not get 50% bonus to all drones and not only combat, cause of the current +1 drone controlle/ level. if ccp wont change the drone system and introduce the new drones they would have to modify the drone carrier bonus to 10% damage output instead of +1 drone/ level to make it the same as with the new "5 drones for everyone" system. AND THATS A *** NERF TO DRONE CARRIERS which ccp has said several times is not intended to be, but they r doing it!!!!! i hope this makes it a little bit more clear to all those people who r still saying its not a nerf, cause if its realy not a nerf ccp should realy try to stay as familar to the old system as possible no matter of what they implement new (EW-drones....) 2. i dont know why everyone seems too ignore posts about changeing the hp bonus of drones into a signature reduction. as long as im not missing some real keypoint its more similar to the old 15 drone system! cause it would increase the targeting time AND make them tougher SO COULD ANYONE PLZ BE SO KIND AND ANSWER MY QUESTION WHY ITS STILL HP BONUS???? im realy getting ****ed off by this ignorance
Skulmar	Posted - 2005.11.04 16:44:00 - [6] ok seems like some people still dont get it. 1. the reason why all the domi users are complaining is that if the drone patch is realy not intended as a drone carrier nerf, drone carriers should get an effectiveness bonus to all drone types, cause else they wont benefit as much from the patch as other ships which is the same as a nerf. WHY? because if they would introduce the new drones with the current 15 drones system, drone carriers would be 50% better in useing them (cause of 50% more drones in space). with the current layout of the patch they wont have this bonus so its a nerf, because if the patch is only for reducing the drone numbers there is no reason why they should not get 50% bonus to all drones and not only combat, cause of the current +1 drone controlle/ level. if ccp wont change the drone system and introduce the new drones they would have to modify the drone carrier bonus to 10% damage output instead of +1 drone/ level to make it the same as with the new "5 drones for everyone" system. AND THATS A *** NERF TO DRONE CARRIERS which ccp has said several times is not intended to be, but they r doing it!!!!! i hope this makes it a little bit more clear to all those people who r still saying its not a nerf, cause if its realy not a nerf ccp should realy try to stay as familar to the old system as possible no matter of what they implement new (EW-drones....) 2. i dont know why everyone seems too ignore posts about changeing the hp bonus of drones into a signature reduction. as long as im not missing some real keypoint its more similar to the old 15 drone system! cause it would increase the targeting time AND make them tougher SO COULD ANYONE PLZ BE SO KIND AND ANSWER MY QUESTION WHY ITS STILL HP BONUS???? im realy getting ****ed off by this ignorance

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.