EVE Search - New drones, modules and what not

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 42 post(s)
theRaptor	Posted - 2005.11.01 10:16:00 - [1] Originally by: Zyrla Bladestorm I've still got this little red light spinning around and klaxons wailing in my head over the domi being able to whip out drones with damage and range roughly equal to a gankageddon (before modules even ) albeit a stationary gankageddon, However there don't seem to be many replys by others along the same lines, am I the only one who's alarms went off or did I miss something ?. They are stationary and can be killed. Give me the geddon anyday. And I heard the noise of thunder. And I looked and behold: a pale horse. And his name, that sat on him, was Death. And Hell followed with him
theRaptor Caldari Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2005.11.01 10:16:00 - [2] Originally by: Zyrla Bladestorm I've still got this little red light spinning around and klaxons wailing in my head over the domi being able to whip out drones with damage and range roughly equal to a gankageddon (before modules even ) albeit a stationary gankageddon, However there don't seem to be many replys by others along the same lines, am I the only one who's alarms went off or did I miss something ?. They are stationary and can be killed. Give me the geddon anyday. I don't think you trust, in, my, self-righteous suicide.
theRaptor	Posted - 2005.11.01 14:18:00 - [3] Originally by: Tuxford Changing racial damage types to all damage types. My. God. A dev who see's reason. Can I get that on my crow as well? And I heard the noise of thunder. And I looked and behold: a pale horse. And his name, that sat on him, was Death. And Hell followed with him
theRaptor Caldari Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2005.11.01 14:18:00 - [4] Originally by: Tuxford Changing racial damage types to all damage types. My. God. A dev who see's reason. Can I get that on my crow as well? I don't think you trust, in, my, self-righteous suicide.
theRaptor	Posted - 2005.11.01 14:22:00 - [5] Originally by: Antic Originally by: Tuxford I'm changing the racial damage bonus to all damage types. I see, i hope this means you will also change all the missile racial damage bonuses on Caldari ships to all damage types. See for example the Cerebrus. The situations are similar so why should gallente be given a perk such as this and caldari not? Mainly because everyone tanks thermal more then kinetic. I would like to see Caldari get a general damage bonus, but a kinetic bonus isn't as horrible as a thermal one. Not to mention carrying different ammo types (to switch over in combat) is easier then carrying spare drones. And I heard the noise of thunder. And I looked and behold: a pale horse. And his name, that sat on him, was Death. And Hell followed with him
theRaptor Caldari Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2005.11.01 14:22:00 - [6] Originally by: Antic Originally by: Tuxford I'm changing the racial damage bonus to all damage types. I see, i hope this means you will also change all the missile racial damage bonuses on Caldari ships to all damage types. See for example the Cerebrus. The situations are similar so why should gallente be given a perk such as this and caldari not? Mainly because everyone tanks thermal more then kinetic. I would like to see Caldari get a general damage bonus, but a kinetic bonus isn't as horrible as a thermal one. Not to mention carrying different ammo types (to switch over in combat) is easier then carrying spare drones. I don't think you trust, in, my, self-righteous suicide.
theRaptor	Posted - 2005.11.03 12:38:00 - [7] Originally by: Nafri Originally by: ChalSto This whole drone-"improvement"-******** is ONLY a cost-reduction-improvement.(lol....."less" laggs, less hardware-cost = cost-reduction....sure..........now MUCH more players will use drones...lol....and you HAVE TO buy new hardware....) This was NERVER an idea of a game-developer. This was an idea of the management. And now we gamers must pay for it. Dear CCP-Management, if you want to destroy EvE, please just shut-down all servers^^ Greethings a manager your funny, reducing drone lag is a major need of all dedicated PvP Which could be achieved by adding better hardware. I get more lag from turrets then drones in small fights (10-20 people). What CCP should have done is make drones act as a single group during large fights. So instead of running AI for 10-15 drones it just runs the AI for one and adds on a "swarm of drones animation", and multiplies all the numbers by how many drones you have. But coding that is more difficult then just dropping the number of drones. And I heard the noise of thunder. And I looked and behold: a pale horse. And his name, that sat on him, was Death. And Hell followed with him
theRaptor Caldari Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2005.11.03 12:38:00 - [8] Originally by: Nafri Originally by: ChalSto This whole drone-"improvement"-******** is ONLY a cost-reduction-improvement.(lol....."less" laggs, less hardware-cost = cost-reduction....sure..........now MUCH more players will use drones...lol....and you HAVE TO buy new hardware....) This was NERVER an idea of a game-developer. This was an idea of the management. And now we gamers must pay for it. Dear CCP-Management, if you want to destroy EvE, please just shut-down all servers^^ Greethings a manager your funny, reducing drone lag is a major need of all dedicated PvP Which could be achieved by adding better hardware. I get more lag from turrets then drones in small fights (10-20 people). What CCP should have done is make drones act as a single group during large fights. So instead of running AI for 10-15 drones it just runs the AI for one and adds on a "swarm of drones animation", and multiplies all the numbers by how many drones you have. But coding that is more difficult then just dropping the number of drones. I don't think you trust, in, my, self-righteous suicide.
theRaptor	Posted - 2005.11.21 18:53:00 - [9] Originally by: Jon Xylur CCCP meesed up the drones big time. Now they can't do gull dmaage to a webbed battleship since they orbit so fast thei'r nerfed trackign can't stay up with it. Fix the tracking please! Ugh, I wish they would change how tracking works. If you are orbiting something then your guns have to move very little, in fact they could probably just stay locked in place. It is only when someone is orbiting you that your guns have to track independant of the hull of your ship. So currently it is quite hilarious when Inties try and have a fight without webs. And I looked and behold: a pale horse. And his name, that sat on him, was Death. And Hell followed with him
theRaptor Caldari Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2005.11.21 18:53:00 - [10] Originally by: Jon Xylur CCCP meesed up the drones big time. Now they can't do gull dmaage to a webbed battleship since they orbit so fast thei'r nerfed trackign can't stay up with it. Fix the tracking please! Ugh, I wish they would change how tracking works. If you are orbiting something then your guns have to move very little, in fact they could probably just stay locked in place. It is only when someone is orbiting you that your guns have to track independant of the hull of your ship. So currently it is quite hilarious when Inties try and have a fight without webs. I don't think you trust, in, my, self-righteous suicide.
theRaptor	Posted - 2005.12.02 11:29:00 - [11] Originally by: Kaeten TBH I don't mind the changes... Rather have more things in the game than not having more things, makes people think more. Alos, I like change, brings challenges to the game No. There is plenty of variety in game, the problem is most of it is half assed and doesn't work right. And this new stuff will be half assed and not work right. CCP need to take ritalin and not run off going "ooohhh shineeeey" every two weeks. The Mk2 project should have been done before they ever introduced T2 ships. Cruisers should have been buffed before I ever starting playing this game. etc. But CCP are stuck introducing more content in the hopes of distracting people from that fact that most of the current content is half assed. They have really made great strides in the last six months, but basic module balance issues should have been done shortly after release. I, don't, think, you, trust, in my self-righteous suicide.
theRaptor Caldari Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2005.12.02 11:29:00 - [12] Originally by: Kaeten TBH I don't mind the changes... Rather have more things in the game than not having more things, makes people think more. Alos, I like change, brings challenges to the game No. There is plenty of variety in game, the problem is most of it is half assed and doesn't work right. And this new stuff will be half assed and not work right. CCP need to take ritalin and not run off going "ooohhh shineeeey" every two weeks. The Mk2 project should have been done before they ever introduced T2 ships. Cruisers should have been buffed before I ever starting playing this game. etc. But CCP are stuck introducing more content in the hopes of distracting people from that fact that most of the current content is half assed. They have really made great strides in the last six months, but basic module balance issues should have been done shortly after release. I don't think you trust, in, my, self-righteous suicide.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.