EVE Search - New drones, modules and what not

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 42 post(s)
throbbinnoggin	Posted - 2005.11.04 06:34:00 - [1] My only problen with the additional types of drones being introduced is the versatlity being added to any ship that can float them while ships that have no drone bay will be left out in the dark. Take for instance Maller vs. Thorax. Currently a fairly even matchup in that a good pilot in either can defeat the other. With the proposed system all drone bays will be cut in half further reducing the Rax drone bay to 50m3. But it will still be able to float 5 medium drones of which it has the choice of tracking disruptors or ew to nullify the Mallers guns, neuts to burn its cap or better yet, webber drones. These could effectively free up a Rax's midslot for a cap booster instead of a web for example. Note the above is just an example and not another anti Rax rant...been enough of those. It's just an example of how the versatility of any ship capable of floating any sort of dronage, and its imo unbalancing advantage it will give them vs. their non drone capable counterparts. Btw, if I'm "missing" some counterpoint my apologies if its already been brought up. But being up to 36 pages I couldn't bring myself to look through more than a half dozen or so. Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. 'Abraham Lincoln'
throbbinnoggin Gallente Eminent Domain	Posted - 2005.11.04 06:34:00 - [2] My only problen with the additional types of drones being introduced is the versatlity being added to any ship that can float them while ships that have no drone bay will be left out in the dark. Take for instance Maller vs. Thorax. Currently a fairly even matchup in that a good pilot in either can defeat the other. With the proposed system all drone bays will be cut in half further reducing the Rax drone bay to 50m3. But it will still be able to float 5 medium drones of which it has the choice of tracking disruptors or ew to nullify the Mallers guns, neuts to burn its cap or better yet, webber drones. These could effectively free up a Rax's midslot for a cap booster instead of a web for example. Note the above is just an example and not another anti Rax rant...been enough of those. It's just an example of how the versatility of any ship capable of floating any sort of dronage, and its imo unbalancing advantage it will give them vs. their non drone capable counterparts. Btw, if I'm "missing" some counterpoint my apologies if its already been brought up. But being up to 36 pages I couldn't bring myself to look through more than a half dozen or so. Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. 'Abraham Lincoln'
throbbinnoggin	Posted - 2005.11.19 20:58:00 - [3] "More" good news for drone users. Currently on the test server drone base damage hp has been increased. Lights from 4 to 7.5 Medium from 9 to 12 Heavy from 22 to 24 Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. 'Abraham Lincoln'
throbbinnoggin Gallente Eminent Domain	Posted - 2005.11.19 20:58:00 - [4] "More" good news for drone users. Currently on the test server drone base damage hp has been increased. Lights from 4 to 7.5 Medium from 9 to 12 Heavy from 22 to 24 Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. 'Abraham Lincoln'
throbbinnoggin	Posted - 2005.11.20 13:04:00 - [5] I just had to post again as this arguing of 15 vs 5 and various other numbers made me think of the following: Marty DiBergi: Oh, I see. And most amps go up to ten? Nigel Tufnel: Exactly. Marty DiBergi: Does that mean it's louder? Is it any louder? Nigel Tufnel: Well, it's one louder, isn't it? It's not ten. You see, most blokes, you know, will be playing at ten. You're on ten here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on ten on your guitar. Where can you go from there? Where? Marty DiBergi: I don't know. Nigel Tufnel: Nowhere. Exactly. What we do is, if we need that extra push over the cliff, you know what we do? Marty DiBergi: Put it up to eleven. Nigel Tufnel: Eleven. Exactly. One louder. Marty DiBergi: Why don't you just make ten louder and make ten be the top number and make that a little louder? Nigel Tufnel: [pause] These go to eleven This Is Spinal Tap Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. 'Abraham Lincoln'
throbbinnoggin Gallente Eminent Domain	Posted - 2005.11.20 13:04:00 - [6] I just had to post again as this arguing of 15 vs 5 and various other numbers made me think of the following: Marty DiBergi: Oh, I see. And most amps go up to ten? Nigel Tufnel: Exactly. Marty DiBergi: Does that mean it's louder? Is it any louder? Nigel Tufnel: Well, it's one louder, isn't it? It's not ten. You see, most blokes, you know, will be playing at ten. You're on ten here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on ten on your guitar. Where can you go from there? Where? Marty DiBergi: I don't know. Nigel Tufnel: Nowhere. Exactly. What we do is, if we need that extra push over the cliff, you know what we do? Marty DiBergi: Put it up to eleven. Nigel Tufnel: Eleven. Exactly. One louder. Marty DiBergi: Why don't you just make ten louder and make ten be the top number and make that a little louder? Nigel Tufnel: [pause] These go to eleven This Is Spinal Tap Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. 'Abraham Lincoln'

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.