Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Tear Miner
Republic University Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:34:00 -
[31] - Quote
haha
 |

Gheng Kondur
Serva Fidem
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:38:00 -
[32] - Quote
While I personally would like a better balance on CSM, the fact is that this was a democratic process and most people I know in hi sec never voted for anybody.
The blame is therefore with those who didn't vote, not the process.
If those who are engaged with the game and want to change things and bother to stand and vote are all null sec, that's who we will get.
Yes some credible candidates are needed, and as with any democratic system you are more likley to vote for the person you think will do the least amount of harm, but unless somebody chooses to stand and people in hi sec vote for them, those who care about the game and can be bothered to vote from null sec will be over represented on CSM.
As for those who are currently there, they represent what they know and the people who voted for them. Nothing wrong in that |

Cidwm
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:38:00 -
[33] - Quote
I wonder what would happen if the CSM did vanish, or the goons only got 1 seat (or none)... wonder how long they would endure without the extra intel and preperations they have been getting from CSM information... of course, can't prove any of this and this is just speculation but ina thread that says soemthing that could upset the goons and Mittani's grasp on eve i would have thought more goons would have posted in the defence on the CSM staying as it is |

Josie Starshine
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:42:00 -
[34] - Quote
Kronos Hopeslayer wrote:Typical socialist bs... Only support democracy when it suits your specific needs. If the "people" are upset about the choices made by the current CSM then by all means vote someone who represents your needs in the next election.
If you are one player with one account and can make one vote but I am one player with eight accounts and can make eight votes... how democratic is that?
(Just an example. I only have one account, as well.) |

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
129
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:42:00 -
[35] - Quote
Blastier wrote:
So the message of the actual player base doesn't come across.
The funniest thing is that they don't even WANT to pass a message. If they did, they would have voted for someone.
Ok let's do something else.
In order to promote peoples running for the CSM, let's allow those peoples to send one or two EVEmails to each and every toon in EVE before the elections. How cool is that ?
The main problem with electing a CSM dude in Highsec is that there is no global channel or something. Random highsec pubbies don't read forums. But if you send them an evemail, they'll read it. And it's basicly the only way to spread the word.
In nullsec alliances, well, they have their own forums, mumble/TS channels, jabbers and so on. Spreading an information doesn't take long/is possible. In highsec, except shouting in Jita's local 24/24, peoples can't hear you or won't even care.
Allow every candidate to send ONE global evemail and it's all good. |

gargars
Cohesion Inc Beyond-Repair
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:44:00 -
[36] - Quote
Kronos Hopeslayer wrote:Typical socialist bs... Only support democracy when it suits your specific needs. If the "people" are upset about the choices made by the current CSM then by all means vote someone who represents your needs in the next election.
I can see your point.... but the purpose of the council is to bring the concerns and ideas of the entirety of EVE to CCP's attention, not a popularity contest easily won by whichever corp or alliance can command the most votes with little or no effort.
Unfortunately that is the way the voting system that is in place is working, especially this last time around.
Null sec has huge alliances to survive. This also meant thousands of votes with no effort. It's flawed.
|

The Offerer
Republic University Minmatar Republic
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:45:00 -
[37] - Quote
Lady Sophie Asphyxia wrote: My own personal opinion would be to maintain the current method of voting and CSM formation (after all it is up to people to vote for who they want - we all get the same chance and the ability to review everybody's manifesto), however, I believe the CSM/CCP should be there to put forward and generate ideas and potential game changes, which are then voted on by the playerbase via an in-game voting system (preferably at the log in character selection screen to avoid interfering with gameplay). The ideas could then be prioritised in order of popularity.
To ensure everybody is represented there should be some kind of weighting to ensure null, low-sec etc ideas can also move forward.
I also hope that one of these many CSM must go topics can stay in General Discussion to ensure maximum exposure (after all this is an important enough topic surely?) instead of being moved to speakers corner.
I still don't see what is wrong with the current system:
- Players post ideas in "Features & Ideas" and "Assembly Hall" sections of the forums. Anyone can do it: 0.0 players, pirates, miners, highsec players, hard-core gamers, casual players,...
- The important topics and topics with enough support are then gathered by the CSM and presented in one big crowdsourcing event list.
- CCP advertised for days that list on the log-in screen of the game and even put banners to remind/inform players that they have a chance to decide which ideas will have priorities.
- The weighting comes naturally from the playerbase itself. If players are relatively happy with the state of one of the aspects of the game it's logical to have less improvement ideas posted for that particular aspect of the game. You can not force an equal number of ideas when one part of the game is horribly broken and forgotten by the devs for years.
- General discussion should stay like that - General discussion. It's much more practical to have a section of the forum for Features and Ideas, like we currently have now. Apart from the Trade sections which by their nature have a high volume of new posts daily, the "Features and Ideas" section is the third most active forum section after General Discussion and CAOD. Merging F&I and GD would only mean chaos and decreased user experience for those who search for topics of the specific type. |

Dalketh
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:48:00 -
[38] - Quote
Cidwm wrote:I i would have thought more goons would have posted in the defence on the CSM staying as it is
Thread barely an hour old lol.....
|

Raeloth Draenor
Aliastra Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:50:00 -
[39] - Quote
Josie Starshine wrote:Karadion wrote:Josie Starshine wrote:Only way to fix the CSM system is to remove it, period. Goonswarm and pets will just endeavor to exploit whatever new CSM structure is introduced. Smoke & mirrors. And if it is removed. "Only way to fix Eve Online is to remove Goonswarm / ban them all. Goonswarm and pets will just endeavor to exploit whatever shortcomings this game has." Slippery slope. Your statement does not invalidate mine though. Goonswarm is a known entity with a known agenda and there is nothing wrong with that. The problem is when you use the CSM as a means to subvert all of EVE Online to that agenda while 'pretending', as a CSM member, to have EVE Online's best interests at heart .
And you have proof that this is what the 2 Goon CSM members are doing? And of course we also have to accept the totally implausible premise that Mittens and Vile rat are also able to brainwash and control the majority of the CSM into blindly following their agenda?
These threads are starting to become even more rediculous. FFS I'm a "pubbie" as they call it and even I'm getting tired of the rhetoric. If you think you can do a better job, then put up or shut up. Otherwise, please just shut up. |

Deucalion Ex Mortis
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:50:00 -
[40] - Quote
SMT008 wrote:Blastier wrote:
So the message of the actual player base doesn't come across.
The funniest thing is that they don't even WANT to pass a message. If they did, they would have voted for someone. Ok let's do something else. In order to promote peoples running for the CSM, let's allow those peoples to send one or two EVEmails to each and every toon in EVE before the elections. How cool is that ? The main problem with electing a CSM dude in Highsec is that there is no global channel or something. Random highsec pubbies don't read forums. But if you send them an evemail, they'll read it. And it's basicly the only way to spread the word. In nullsec alliances, well, they have their own forums, mumble/TS channels, jabbers and so on. Spreading an information doesn't take long/is possible. In highsec, except shouting in Jita's local 24/24, peoples can't hear you or won't even care. Allow every candidate to send ONE global evemail and it's all good.
HOLY CRAP an goon that is making sense.. I swallowed my tongue, help!
But may I suggest having a little more respect for your fellow gamers, half the problem the CSM are having right now is they throw words like GÇ£puddieGÇ¥, and GÇ£nubGÇ¥ around while talking about issues that concern everyone in game. If you showed some respect people may just start agreeing with you more. In game and on local fine but not in a discussion concerning the future of CSM, Eve, and CCP.
|

Tear Miner
Republic University Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:50:00 -
[41] - Quote
In all seriousness, I think that the CSM should be divided up with a represenative for each area of gameplay like Null/FW/WH, etc. instead of just a group of random players that may have vested interests in only certain parts of the game.
That makes a lot more sense. |

Ra Vhim
Black Bag Ops
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:54:00 -
[42] - Quote
"I'm starting to get feedback from players..."
Wait, what? Right...
Suddenly the man gets feedback from the players. I call bullshit on this one.
Translation: "I don't like CSM, they cause trouble. I will have to change that." (Searches on the forum among the never ending whines about everything and find some whines about CSM).
CSM is far from perfect, but it is what we got. The only change needed is that a player only can vote once, not once per account. |

The Offerer
Republic University Minmatar Republic
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:57:00 -
[43] - Quote
Tear Miner wrote:In all seriousness, I think that the CSM should be divided up with a represenative for each area of gameplay like Null/FW/WH, etc. instead of just a group of random players that may have vested interests in only certain parts of the game.
That makes a lot more sense. Not when a specific part of the game is neglected over other parts. If The CSM is primarily 0.0 oriented that means only one thing - the amount of problems with the 0.0 gameplay is by far the biggest and a lot of 0.0 players decided to vote. |

John Nucleus
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:58:00 -
[44] - Quote
It's probably been suggested before but how about having a representative for every big part of the game?
For exemple: Null sec, Low sec, High sec, Industry, Mission, Incursion, FW, WH, PI, etc.
Edit: Snap, I really should read the previous posts before posting... Well, great mind thinks alike right? |

Dalketh
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:58:00 -
[45] - Quote
Tear Miner wrote:In all seriousness, I think that the CSM should be divided up with a represenative for each area of gameplay like Null/FW/WH, etc. instead of just a group of random players that may have vested interests in only certain parts of the game.
That makes a lot more sense.
It does, but as one goon pointed out they already have a plan on how to exploit that (mission running alt running under false pretenses). But if a verifiable way to do it can be found sounds interesting.
|

Josie Starshine
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:22:00 -
[46] - Quote
Raeloth Draenor wrote:Josie Starshine wrote:Karadion wrote:Josie Starshine wrote:Only way to fix the CSM system is to remove it, period. Goonswarm and pets will just endeavor to exploit whatever new CSM structure is introduced. Smoke & mirrors. And if it is removed. "Only way to fix Eve Online is to remove Goonswarm / ban them all. Goonswarm and pets will just endeavor to exploit whatever shortcomings this game has." Slippery slope. Your statement does not invalidate mine though. Goonswarm is a known entity with a known agenda and there is nothing wrong with that. The problem is when you use the CSM as a means to subvert all of EVE Online to that agenda while 'pretending', as a CSM member, to have EVE Online's best interests at heart . And you have proof that this is what the 2 Goon CSM members are doing? And of course we also have to accept the totally implausible premise that Mittens and Vile rat are also able to brainwash and control the majority of the CSM into blindly following their agenda? These threads are starting to become even more rediculous. FFS I'm a "pubbie" as they call it and even I'm getting tired of the rhetoric. If you think you can do a better job, then put up or shut up. Otherwise, please just shut up.
Karadion wrote: "Goonswarm and pets will just endeavor to exploit whatever shortcomings this game has."
|

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
130
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:22:00 -
[47] - Quote
John Nucleus wrote:It's probably been suggested before but how about having a representative for every big part of the game?
For exemple: Null sec, Low sec, High sec, Industry, Mission, Incursion, FW, WH, PI, etc.
Nope. Why you ask ?
It's pretty simple. Let's say we manage to put Mittani in the nullsec seat. Then the nullsec part of that CSM will be biased toward Goons and friends. I don't know how to explain it because I'm not really english/american, but you know what I meant.
Right now, GSF, PL, Legion of Death, Morsus Mihi, Rooks and Kings and DNS have representatives. It would be even worse if all nullsec space get only one representative. |

T-Jay Charante
The Scope Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:42:00 -
[48] - Quote
SMT008 wrote:John Nucleus wrote:It's probably been suggested before but how about having a representative for every big part of the game?
For exemple: Null sec, Low sec, High sec, Industry, Mission, Incursion, FW, WH, PI, etc.
Nope. Why you ask ? It's pretty simple. Let's say we manage to put Mittani in the nullsec seat. Then the nullsec part of that CSM will be biased toward Goons and friends. I don't know how to explain it because I'm not really english/american, but you know what I meant. Right now, GSF, PL, Legion of Death, Morsus Mihi, Rooks and Kings and DNS have representatives. It would be even worse if all nullsec space get only one representative.
I think you just made his point, Quote:Then the nullsec part of that CSM will be biased toward Goons and friends , as in, having a null sec CSM, it's biased towards, well, null sec.
|

Mai Khumm
Shockwave Innovations
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:45:00 -
[49] - Quote
Yes, change the CSM.
I really don't feel like playing "Goonswarm Online: Your **** is ours" |

T-Jay Charante
The Scope Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:56:00 -
[50] - Quote
Mai Khumm wrote:Yes, change the CSM.
I really don't feel like playing "Goonswarm Online: Your **** is ours"
To be honest, I wouldn't care if it was all Goons on the CSM, as long as there was a representative that reflected each play style.
|

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1383
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:05:00 -
[51] - Quote
Cidwm wrote:I wonder what would happen if the CSM did vanish, or the goons only got 1 seat (or none)... wonder how long they would endure without the extra intel and preperations they have been getting from CSM information... of course, can't prove any of this and this is just speculation but ina thread that says soemthing that could upset the goons and Mittani's grasp on eve i would have thought more goons would have posted in the defence on the CSM staying as it is
I don't really care, because the 'null sec slant' is, in practice, a chimera. Some of the most active people in CSM6 aren't necessarily from nullsec- Trebor, Meissa, and Two Step - and I work with them very closely on a daily basis.
There's this persistent myth that the CSM is often at each other's throats, or that I'm crushing Trebor under my heel or something. In practice, what's wrong with EVE is obvious and not particularly controversial. There's no 'null vs non-null' divide. There's not really even a divide on CSM6 period; we've been effective precisely because we're united.
People who lost barges and want to spew conspiracy theories have been emailing HIlmar with their tinfoil, obviously enough. Whatever. vOv |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1383
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:12:00 -
[52] - Quote
its p. gratifying that folks are so terrified of my persuasive abilities though! |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1383
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:20:00 -
[53] - Quote
nerf attractive people with charisma and a modicum of social graces rarrrrrr |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
45
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:46:00 -
[54] - Quote
So as a person who has consistently ran for the CSM since CSM II (and won 1 and a half times) I support the CSM. I've seen the good it can do. As for the recent CSM, they didn't really represent where I would like CCP to focus on, but they won fair and square.
In the end what this proves is that largely the a big part of the population in Eve either has no interest in the CSM, doesn't believe the CSM has any affect or unconvinced there is any benefit from participating in the outside Eve "Eve" elements, like the CSM, the forums or other RL aspects of Eve.
The last CSM may have been a tipping point, more of the "little guys" as I like to call them might try and show some interest, CCP may have seen how a CSM too focused on the end game could be bad and changes will occur but I expect that is optimism on my part.
Even if the "little guy" did wake up it would still be an exersise in "herding cats" to get alignment on a single candidate.
So as the saying goes "Eve" gets the goverment they deserve. I don't mean that to be harsh to folks that didn't vote other folks in, but unless something changes the large power blocks will dominate the CSM. Is that bad, good, neither? I think it just "is".
As for complaints about the goons in the CSM, why wouldn't you expect them to be a major part of the CSM? They are a huge part of Eve. And everything they do is a legitimate part of the sandbox CCP built that we all celebrate every time we log in. In the end every time you renew your subscription in Eve you are saying you believe that spending time in this sandbox is better than not.
"You have seen the enemy and he is you!"
I'm a software engineer and although I have great faith in the future of AI I have no hope there is a way anytime soon to create a game that could selectively detect and prevent asshatery. Either you make everything possible and you get Eve with all its "good" and "BAD" behaviing players or you start to build social engineering into the game mechanics and you change your sandbox into a slide surrounded by rubber padding and pillows.
Tada O was briefly in the goons, it wasn't a good fit because althought we loved the freedom and sense of fun of the goons we had too many "PC" members that refused to tolerate the manner in which freedom can sometimes manifest.
So I can't say I agree these days with most of what the goons seem to be doing but I also don't see how you would change Eve to stop that and not fundementally ruin the game in other ways. As to whether the goons in the CSM is a good or bad thing, I would say its just one more part of the experience CCP created.
Issler |

Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
268
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:46:00 -
[55] - Quote
Tear Miner wrote:In all seriousness, I think that the CSM should be divided up with a represenative for each area of gameplay like Null/FW/WH, etc. instead of just a group of random players that may have vested interests in only certain parts of the game.
That makes a lot more sense. So instead of some players who may have a vested interest in certain parts of the game you want each member to have a vested interest in a certain part of the game. You want to return to the old CSMs where absolutely nothing got accomplished?
|

Rer Eirikr
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 22:08:00 -
[56] - Quote
The current CSM's format should stay the way it is because they actually focus on certain sections of EVE. By doing so they can actually get stuff done and effectively change EVE for the better.
If people want the CSM to focus in other areas, then find a candidate and actually do the legwork to get said person elected.
Don't change the CSM's format, just change who gets elected. Force a change on your own behalf, not CCP's. |

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
132
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 22:20:00 -
[57] - Quote
T-Jay Charante wrote:I think you just made his point, Quote:Then the nullsec part of that CSM will be biased toward Goons and friends , as in, having a null sec CSM, it's biased towards, well, null sec.
I actually mean that if the nullsec CSM is a GSF guy, other entities in nullsec won't be represented. Which is just as bad as the current situation (Even if I don't think it's THAT bad considering all the things CCP is working on right now, you know, spaceship related stuff that no one care about ?). |

The Offerer
Republic University Minmatar Republic
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 23:42:00 -
[58] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:nerf attractive people with charisma and a modicum of social graces rarrrrrr Why nerf Mintchip? |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 02:05:00 -
[59] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Cidwm wrote:I wonder what would happen if the CSM did vanish, or the goons only got 1 seat (or none)... wonder how long they would endure without the extra intel and preperations they have been getting from CSM information... of course, can't prove any of this and this is just speculation but ina thread that says soemthing that could upset the goons and Mittani's grasp on eve i would have thought more goons would have posted in the defence on the CSM staying as it is I don't really care, because the 'null sec slant' is, in practice, a chimera. Some of the most active people in CSM6 aren't necessarily from nullsec- Trebor, Meissa, and Two Step - and I work with them very closely on a daily basis. Edit: Two step is all giddy about 'hurr wspace is nullsec hurr' but you know what i mean There's this persistent myth that the CSM is often at each other's throats, or that I'm crushing Trebor under my heel or something. In practice, what's wrong with EVE is obvious and not particularly controversial. There's no 'null vs non-null' divide. There's not really even a divide on CSM6 period; we've been effective precisely because we're united. People who lost barges and want to spew conspiracy theories have been emailing HIlmar with their tinfoil, obviously enough. Whatever. vOv
At some point you need to stop talking. I know, I know. You enjoy hearing yourself speak. Who doesn't? But really, you're losing touch with your own self.
Wasn't the CSM6 that put w-space grav nerfs on the table?
Wasn't it your own corp that attacked said barges?
Shall I continue?
As for CSM being at each other's throats being a popular myth, I'll disagree. I think the popular perception is that everyone in the CSM has their nose in each other's arse forming a nice big circle while inhaling the aroma deeply. There's nothing theoretical about the null slant coming from CSM or Goon's own actions of late under your leadership.
I look forward to any change CCP brings about to the structure and makeup of future CSMs. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir.
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 02:33:00 -
[60] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:The Mittani wrote:Cidwm wrote:I wonder what would happen if the CSM did vanish, or the goons only got 1 seat (or none)... wonder how long they would endure without the extra intel and preperations they have been getting from CSM information... of course, can't prove any of this and this is just speculation but ina thread that says soemthing that could upset the goons and Mittani's grasp on eve i would have thought more goons would have posted in the defence on the CSM staying as it is I don't really care, because the 'null sec slant' is, in practice, a chimera. Some of the most active people in CSM6 aren't necessarily from nullsec- Trebor, Meissa, and Two Step - and I work with them very closely on a daily basis. Edit: Two step is all giddy about 'hurr wspace is nullsec hurr' but you know what i mean There's this persistent myth that the CSM is often at each other's throats, or that I'm crushing Trebor under my heel or something. In practice, what's wrong with EVE is obvious and not particularly controversial. There's no 'null vs non-null' divide. There's not really even a divide on CSM6 period; we've been effective precisely because we're united. People who lost barges and want to spew conspiracy theories have been emailing HIlmar with their tinfoil, obviously enough. Whatever. vOv At some point you need to stop talking. I know, I know. You enjoy hearing yourself speak. Who doesn't? But really, you're losing touch with your own self. Wasn't the CSM6 that put w-space grav nerfs on the table? Wasn't it your own corp that attacked said barges? Shall I continue? As for CSM being at each other's throats being a popular myth, I'll disagree. I think the popular perception is that everyone in the CSM has their nose in each other's arse forming a nice big circle while inhaling the aroma deeply. There's nothing theoretical about the null slant coming from CSM or Goon's own actions of late under your leadership. I look forward to any change CCP brings about to the structure and makeup of future CSMs.
Hey dumbass. Yes you Mr Kidd the cheap posting alt. Wake up.
First of all - the CSM has been pushing for changes to improve EVE as a game. And maybe they are focusing on nullsec because (other than losec) it's the most broken thing in the game - and easier to fix than losec. In case you hadn't noticed, HiSec got all sorts of spit polish with Incursions, Mission restructuring, and the Noctis. Nullsec lost the ability to realistically support the large number of players who actually should live and play there, and has become a mindless grind for sov and a struggle to have fun with Supercapitals Online. Nullsec needs attention more than your stupid Level 4 mission hub.
Second of all, just because you run Gallente POSses, or fly Gallente Caps, has nothing to do with the CSM. The fact that Goonswarm is (again) griefing empire babies is like a leap year. It comes around every so often, and then it moves on. Did you complain about Hulkageddon too? Because really, the difference is that Goons have numbers and organization, and have targeted a very specific weakness. Cry some more. Or, don't because last time they were just blowing up POSses, rather than changing the cost of running them.
Me, I just put the carrier in the station and I'm flying around in smaller ships - you know what? It's more fun and more challenging.
If HIllmar is going to change the CSM because of anything, it's because (even though he's dapper) Mittens has been pushing, hard, to bring this game back from the brink, and Hillmar was the one leading it there before. Nobody likes the guy who points out their mistakes - and they really don't like the guy who does it in front of everyone (sorry Mittens, that's you). I'd bet that even you will benefit from the "winter expansion" features - and the CSM - including The Mittani and Vile Rat - have been championing that over miniskirts and snakeskin boots. |
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |