My immersion suffers always when my ship is sticking in another one undocking from Jita. So this idea could reduce that. But I like to see other ships undocking with me, so the different exits should still be in sight.
I think there are these Gallente stations models with docks above each other. That would be a nice distance maybe.

Why should it be easier to avoid PVP?

+1, would like.

Don't make station games impossible though, sometimes you just have to get that rude bastard.

LOL! I'm not trying to nerf station games and I don't think this would TBH but would like to make undocking more realistic and it might ease the server load you never know with all that lack of bumping.

My only concern is, IIRC some of the Gallente stations have undock ports in totally different locations that could be hard for smaller gangs to effectively cover.

Wasn't trying to suggest you were attempting to stealth nerf station games, just want to note that my opinion is it's a good idea so long as station games aren't stealth nerfed.

It's not PVP, well not in the consensual sense, but this wasn't aimed at that it was just a by product. If you sat right on top or underneath a station you could still "PVP". It deals with more than that.

EDIT: Your "PVP" or "Station Camping" could be regarded as an exploit of the undocking mechanic which is merely one of the things this idea addresses but more importantly was the "ship bumping" when undocking and that you have to travel away from the station to turn and warp to a stargate that might be "through" the other side of the station.

What? Camping people into a nullsec station is an exploit?

Biomass yourself. Now.

Oh you're obviously angry at my idea...I'm sorry I put this out there for people to comment on. /sarcasm

You just called every single person who has ever fought in nullsec an exploiter. What is there to comment on?

Station camping.. can't be regarded as an exploit. No way, no how.

Why should it be easier to avoid PVP?

I actually quite prefer the undock being in the same place all the time. Much easier to avoid unexpected PvP that way. If I undock and there's a bubble, I dock up again. If there isn't, I warp to my instant undock. From docking invulnerability to warp invulnerability.

If there were multiple different undock channels, I'd be more upset by it. I'd need multiple undocks for each pipe out of each station. I'm quite fond of keeping an undock for the next few grids out of station, so as not to be too predictable.

2 undock points on jita amarr rens and dodixie main stations, maybe throw in hek.

The rest are fine as is and don't need any additional.

Station camping is not nor will ever be considered an exploit. Your definition of exploit is half-assed by the way as well. To clarify for you I will refer to Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploit_%28video_gaming%29

TL:DR:

An exploit, in video games, is the use of a bug or glitches, rates, hit boxes, or speed, etc. ([game mechanics]) by a player to their advantage in a manner not intended by the game's designers.

Station camping is working as intended.

As for the multiple docking ports.. to increase immersion I can get on board with it but I think it should only really apply to highly trafficked systems where it will actually help to hinder congestion. I'd like to see a T2 rebalance sooner than this but a solid idea nevertheless.

Like the idea, needs refinement. Bump reply.

+1

My idea is to enable multiple points of egress from a station to give greater flexibility to pilots when undocking. This would effectively:

• Reduce the time to undock
• Give a challenge to "Station Campers"
• Provide a more immerse environment whereby not all ships leave via the same docking port.