EVE Search - H-PA29

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

H-PA29

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 .. 11 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Uggs386	Posted - 2005.11.13 20:35:00 - [241] yeah pick names middle of alphabet and very hard to pronounce for long life in fleet battles. Proud Member of the NUBSIES Alliance.
Dianabolic	Posted - 2005.11.13 20:43:00 - [242] If I ever pick anohter character, I'll choose from the following names: Down Warping Out Not there Looking funny Down is my personal favourite tho. Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
Uggs386	Posted - 2005.11.13 20:44:00 - [243] lol omg diana that is a great idea lol, if I only we could change names of our players. Proud Member of the NUBSIES Alliance.
Edoo	Posted - 2005.11.13 20:45:00 - [244] Originally by: Dianabolic If I ever pick anohter character, I'll choose from the following names: Down Warping Out Not there Looking funny Down is my personal favourite tho. lmfao
SengH	Posted - 2005.11.13 21:20:00 - [245] Edited by: SengH on 13/11/2005 21:21:05 Originally by: Edoo Originally by: Dianabolic If I ever pick anohter character, I'll choose from the following names: Down Warping Out Not there Looking funny Down is my personal favourite tho. lmfao I wonder if safespot is already taken.... Edit: Safespot Everyone would be even better.
Darkrydar	Posted - 2005.11.13 21:42:00 - [246] Originally by: Dianabolic If I ever pick anohter character, I'll choose from the following names: Down Warping Out Not there Looking funny Down is my personal favourite tho. I'd go with 'Locking Locking'.
Harry Canyon	Posted - 2005.11.13 21:45:00 - [247] Originally by: Thomas Jefferson -- society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither. This is a Ben Franklin quote..not Thomas Jefferson Harry Canyon
Hast	Posted - 2005.11.13 21:59:00 - [248] If I ever command a fleetbattle against NBSI be certain RUNYOUFOOLS, that you will live
Dianabolic	Posted - 2005.11.13 22:06:00 - [249] Originally by: Harry Canyon Originally by: Thomas Jefferson -- society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither. This is a Ben Franklin quote..not Thomas Jefferson Actually, Benjamin Franklin said this: Quote: They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security. Rest assured, I am quoting accurately Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
pershphanie	Posted - 2005.11.13 22:07:00 - [250] Originally by: Dianabolic Originally by: pershphanie In fact rarely will you guys jump into anything. You sit above a gate sniping waiting for your opponent to jump into you. And there, in 2 sentences, goes any credibility you might have. please, expain. Last time I encountered a bob fleet this is exactly what happend. This is exactly what you do. Nothing wrong with it, its a good tactic. But if you do that all the time you lose your right to complain about why ppl dont jump into you.
Dianabolic	Posted - 2005.11.13 22:09:00 - [251] Originally by: pershphanie Originally by: Dianabolic Originally by: pershphanie In fact rarely will you guys jump into anything. You sit above a gate sniping waiting for your opponent to jump into you. And there, in 2 sentences, goes any credibility you might have. please, expain. Last time I encountered a bob fleet this is exactly what happend. This is exactly what you do. Nothing wrong with it, its a good tactic. But if you do that all the time you lose your right to complain about why ppl dont jump into you. Except it isn't what we do, Pers. If we have numbers we ALWAYS jump in. Even if we're OUTNUMBERED we often jump in. Your assertion that we "never, or rarely" jump in is, at best, incorrect, at worst, a lie. Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
Shayla Sh'inlux	Posted - 2005.11.14 00:00:00 - [252] Do we really have to do this 'we always jump outnumbered' - 'no you don't' - 'We don't have drone out' - 'Yes you do' thing EVERY SINGLE thread about lagged out fleetfights? We all know BoB and .5. are t3h ub3r, never deploy drones, always fight in equal or less numbers and always jump in. Can we get over this now? Thanks.
Dianabolic	Posted - 2005.11.14 00:05:00 - [253] Originally by: Shayla Sh'inlux ...always fight in equal or less numbers and always jump in. Sometimes we have the numbers advantage (happened this weekend as it goes, credit to CELES and co for sticking around), sometimes not. The point being we wouldn't wait for twice the numbers, or purposely lag out our opponent. As for the "teh ub4r" rubbish, shayla, this isn't something that will go away over night, perhaps if your lot stopped caring about losing they'd win more AND have more fun? Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
StiZum Hilidii	Posted - 2005.11.14 00:14:00 - [254] having fun and caring squat about your ship takes you to the top in this game STAN FACTA NON VERBA ALTS FTL
Kerosene	Posted - 2005.11.14 01:44:00 - [255] Originally by: StiZum Hilidii having fun and caring squat about your ship takes you to the top in this game I'd say having fun and caring squat about the other guy's ship takes you to the top __
Kodell	Posted - 2005.11.14 02:20:00 - [256] Can i ask if CCP has released an official statement on this debarkal yet? As a new player to this game i'm very shocked with there responce time on this, i could maybe understand it if EvE was a "Free to Play". But we are talking about over 280 "PAYING" players that have had a major bug/flaw hit them and totaly ruin there days game play, not to mention set backs in ships/eqipment. If i was CCP i would be very worried about customers leaving over this, If BIG alliance fleet battles are not supported by the current hardware...then whats the point of having alliance fleets? Kinda also make me wonder what my $45US a months going on.
Taj Zela	Posted - 2005.11.14 02:34:00 - [257] I've got one thing to say to everybody involved in this unfortunate event... OUR SERVER PERFORMANCE LOGS SHOW NO RECORDS OF ABNORMAL OPERATION DURING THE TIME OF YOUR LOSS. PLEASE RESPOND NOTING THAT YOUR ISSUE HAS BEEN ANSWERED & RESOLVED, SO THAT IT MAY BE CHANGED TO STATUS "CLOSED", AND WE CAN HAPPILY ADDRESS MORE IMPORTANT ISSUES.
Drakos	Posted - 2005.11.14 03:46:00 - [258] Originally by: Taj Zela I've got one thing to say to everybody involved in this unfortunate event... OUR SERVER PERFORMANCE LOGS SHOW NO RECORDS OF ABNORMAL OPERATION DURING THE TIME OF YOUR LOSS. PLEASE RESPOND NOTING THAT YOUR ISSUE HAS BEEN ANSWERED & RESOLVED, SO THAT IT MAY BE CHANGED TO STATUS "CLOSED", AND WE CAN HAPPILY ADDRESS MORE IMPORTANT ISSUES. your forgeting the last part, wich is always the same too. ------------- We are sorry for this, but we do hope, that you will swiftly recover from your loss, and be back on track as soon as possible. If you need further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact us again. We'll do all we can to help. ------------- and yeah apparently no ships will be reimbursed, everyone just had ISP problems at the same time in h-pa ops bad luck GG CCP
Monkey Time	Posted - 2005.11.14 08:29:00 - [259] Originally by: Kodell Can i ask if CCP has released an official statement on this debarkal yet? As a new player to this game i'm very shocked with there responce time on this, i could maybe understand it if EvE was a "Free to Play". But we are talking about over 280 "PAYING" players that have had a major bug/flaw hit them and totaly ruin there days game play, not to mention set backs in ships/eqipment. If i was CCP i would be very worried about customers leaving over this, If BIG alliance fleet battles are not supported by the current hardware...then whats the point of having alliance fleets? Kinda also make me wonder what my $45US a months going on. the majority of the responses, from the gm's, have stated that there is nothing wrong with the servers and that it must be our computers that are at fault.
Ishana	Posted - 2005.11.14 08:42:00 - [260] Originally by: Monkey Time Originally by: Kodell Can i ask if CCP has released an official statement on this debarkal yet? As a new player to this game i'm very shocked with there responce time on this, i could maybe understand it if EvE was a "Free to Play". But we are talking about over 280 "PAYING" players that have had a major bug/flaw hit them and totaly ruin there days game play, not to mention set backs in ships/eqipment. If i was CCP i would be very worried about customers leaving over this, If BIG alliance fleet battles are not supported by the current hardware...then whats the point of having alliance fleets? Kinda also make me wonder what my $45US a months going on. the majority of the responses, from the gm's, have stated that there is nothing wrong with the servers and that it must be our computers that are at fault. They always do the same copy/paste responce in these situations. I would be highly **ed off if they did reimbursed ships THIS time. It happend before, it WILL happen again. (probably sooner than later.) People will lose ships, people will petition, and people wil get the same responce every time. (at least I hope so, otherwise allot of people will get **ed off even more.) Yes it sucks you can't have a massive fleet battle, especially with all the wars going on, but that's just the way things are now. Let's just hope things get better in time... _________________________________________________________
BOldMan	Posted - 2005.11.14 09:28:00 - [261] Edited by: BOldMan on 14/11/2005 09:29:11 Originally by: Dianabolic If I ever pick anohter character, I'll choose from the following names: Down Warping Out Not there Looking funny Down is my personal favourite tho. I think Shoting Me' is my favorite choice for next name char.
SengH	Posted - 2005.11.14 09:42:00 - [262] Originally by: Ishana Originally by: Monkey Time Originally by: Kodell Can i ask if CCP has released an official statement on this debarkal yet? As a new player to this game i'm very shocked with there responce time on this, i could maybe understand it if EvE was a "Free to Play". But we are talking about over 280 "PAYING" players that have had a major bug/flaw hit them and totaly ruin there days game play, not to mention set backs in ships/eqipment. If i was CCP i would be very worried about customers leaving over this, If BIG alliance fleet battles are not supported by the current hardware...then whats the point of having alliance fleets? Kinda also make me wonder what my $45US a months going on. the majority of the responses, from the gm's, have stated that there is nothing wrong with the servers and that it must be our computers that are at fault. They always do the same copy/paste responce in these situations. I would be highly **ed off if they did reimbursed ships THIS time. It happend before, it WILL happen again. (probably sooner than later.) People will lose ships, people will petition, and people wil get the same responce every time. (at least I hope so, otherwise allot of people will get **ed off even more.) Yes it sucks you can't have a massive fleet battle, especially with all the wars going on, but that's just the way things are now. Let's just hope things get better in time... The problem is it doesnt happen the same for everyone... ie that PA guy who got reimbursed his diemos for setting off a smartie in empire by accident... (boy did the mods come down quick on that one)
Ishana	Posted - 2005.11.14 11:45:00 - [263] Originally by: SengH Originally by: Ishana Originally by: Monkey Time Originally by: Kodell Can i ask if CCP has released an official statement on this debarkal yet? As a new player to this game i'm very shocked with there responce time on this, i could maybe understand it if EvE was a "Free to Play". But we are talking about over 280 "PAYING" players that have had a major bug/flaw hit them and totaly ruin there days game play, not to mention set backs in ships/eqipment. If i was CCP i would be very worried about customers leaving over this, If BIG alliance fleet battles are not supported by the current hardware...then whats the point of having alliance fleets? Kinda also make me wonder what my $45US a months going on. the majority of the responses, from the gm's, have stated that there is nothing wrong with the servers and that it must be our computers that are at fault. They always do the same copy/paste responce in these situations. I would be highly **ed off if they did reimbursed ships THIS time. It happend before, it WILL happen again. (probably sooner than later.) People will lose ships, people will petition, and people wil get the same responce every time. (at least I hope so, otherwise allot of people will get **ed off even more.) Yes it sucks you can't have a massive fleet battle, especially with all the wars going on, but that's just the way things are now. Let's just hope things get better in time... The problem is it doesnt happen the same for everyone... ie that PA guy who got reimbursed his diemos for setting off a smartie in empire by accident... (boy did the mods come down quick on that one) Not really related to the large fleet/lagfest i was refering to, now is it... _________________________________________________________
Mangus Thermopyle	Posted - 2005.11.14 12:15:00 - [264] 5 knew exactly what we had on the other side, but my guess is that they kept their camp cause they thought they could benefit from the lag that would come. They didnt, and we got a few kills. But thats it. Not really that much to debate, and certainly not worthy of a 9 page thread on this forum. And why do we have BoB smacktalking here? Its not like 5 needs help with that
Endeva	Posted - 2005.11.14 13:48:00 - [265] Originally by: Mangus Thermopyle 5 knew exactly what we had on the other side, but my guess is that they kept their camp cause they thought they could benefit from the lag that would come. They didnt, and we got a few kills. But thats it. Not really that much to debate, and certainly not worthy of a 9 page thread on this forum. And why do we have BoB smacktalking here? Its not like 5 needs help with that U're a noob and people like you shouldn't be allowed to post on the forums. We don't fear your 200 carebears and if we wanted lag we would have put our drones out like your alliance did on many many occasions even if u were outnumbering us by far, so please stfu
anister	Posted - 2005.11.14 13:50:00 - [266] Originally by: Mangus Thermopyle 5 knew exactly what we had on the other side, but my guess is that they kept their camp cause they thought they could benefit from the lag that would come. No, we didn't think we could try and benefit from anything, all we wanted was to fight, and i could see how you would think our ~90 ships would be the cause of the lag rather than your ~200 ships, makes perfect sense. To be 100% honest if i had known it would have lagged that bad i would have just docked and not bothered, then again you lot would have all been chect beating on these forums about how we ran from you.... Originally by: Mangus Thermopyle They didnt, and we got a few kills. But thats it. Not really that much to debate, and certainly not worthy of a 9 page thread on this forum. Puhlease, these 9 pages are not about you, your alliance or anybody in particular, it's about the lag and the servers inability to do what it says on the tin. for a "Massivley multiplayer game" it seems that a massive amount of numbers brings the game to it's knee's for those involved. You cannot deny that the lag screwed the evening up for a lot of people, on both sides, so instead of blaming us for what you think is an intention cause of this be a little constructive about it please. ___
Citizen X	Posted - 2005.11.14 13:52:00 - [267] Originally by: darth solo Originally by: Termy Heh... Players names starting with "A" are trully cursed. pick a name like zqwexutqwer and live forever. d solo. Flying a Scorp and having a name starting with C is bad...
Mangus Thermopyle	Posted - 2005.11.14 13:59:00 - [268] Originally by: Endeva U're a noob and people like you shouldn't be allowed to post on the forums. Very mature. You need to find the fun in life (or atleast in EVE).
NAFnist	Posted - 2005.11.14 14:13:00 - [269] Originally by: Endeva Edited by: Endeva on 14/11/2005 14:08:43 Originally by: Mangus Thermopyle Originally by: Endeva U're a noob and people like you shouldn't be allowed to post on the forums. Very mature. You need to find the fun in life (or atleast in EVE). I was simply trying to stay at your level of understanding... and seeing that from my whole post u decided to answer only that part proves my point... You failed. You made yourself look silly, and no it didnt prove a point. You are just a frustrated person, who resorts to personal flames. For shame.
Shayla Sh'inlux	Posted - 2005.11.14 14:14:00 - [270] Quote: Sometimes we have the numbers advantage (happened this weekend as it goes, credit to CELES and co for sticking around), sometimes not. Then why bring it up every time? I'm mainly referring to The Five that every time they lose a fight it was either lag, or being heavily outnumbered. It would be unthinkable for them to lose due to their own fault. And let's be honest, getting outnumbered 2:1 is bound to happen if you park 100 guys in the middle of 3 hostile alliances. So I don't think there's right to complain there. Quote: The point being we wouldn't wait for twice the numbers, or purposely lag out our opponent. I find this an insulting statement. NEVER have I heard a FC say 'hey let's deploy drones to lag 'em out' or 'Hey let's get 200 ships and lag em out'. There's .5. in PA space, we want to get rid of it and we have the numbers, so why not take 200 guys? Cos the server can't handle it? Well, sure, but neither can the server handle 80 guys jumping in, so it wouldn't have mattered. I remember being in GW in this so-called thing Foundation and we got outnumbered 3:1 by -V- ALL DAY LONG. Did we complain on forums? Nope, we admitted defeat and moved on. Obviously after everything .5. has shouted on these forums admitting defeat would be quite embarassing, but at least you keep the honour to yourself instead of making a fool out of yourself with false forum propaganda. Quote: As for the "teh ub4r" rubbish, shayla, this isn't something that will go away over night, perhaps if your lot stopped caring about losing they'd win more AND have more fun? Well, first of all, the "th3 ub4r" rubbish is all part of the dumb forum smack that is always connected to any form of military engagement with ATUK or some group that involves ATUK. Look at SA v F-E. Mutual respect all over the place. Fnd vs -V-. Check. No t3h ub4r smacktards. MC vs -V-? Same story. G vs ASCN? You guessed it. BoB vs IMP - let's not get there. .5. vs F-E/NBSI/PA - just read 9 our of 20 threads on the frontpage Can't we just behave as adults? Also, who says we care about losing? We just want to have fun; it's a game after all. And as soon as this game starts to even remotely look like a real life thing where things actually DO matter, I'm quitting.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 .. 11 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.