EVE Search - An appeal....... For the refugees of SWG.

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

An appeal....... For the refugees of SWG.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Benilopax	Posted - 2005.11.13 02:44:00 - [1] As we did with earth and beyond, Eve is about to welcome more refugees to it's galaxy. I ask you all to get free trials ready for them and also i ask CEO's to prepare basic skills ships and mods for them so they get the best start possible. They got screwed once lets make sure it doesn't happen again! Thankyou.
Christopher Scott	Posted - 2005.11.13 02:50:00 - [2] How did SWG gets screwed? Linkage?
Nukeitall	Posted - 2005.11.13 02:52:00 - [3] Without getting too specific, MANY very large editions to the game have made it less then tolerable. I doubt we'll see that many refugees, partly because it's a different class of MMO, partly because it's not closing down.
Cmdr Sy	Posted - 2005.11.13 02:58:00 - [4] The alliances of 0.0 stand ready at the gates.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2005.11.13 03:12:00 - [5] Originally by: Christopher Scott How did SWG gets screwed? Linkage? Linkage - Proud member of the [23]. Don't get the reference in my sig? Click it.
Stumbleduck	Posted - 2005.11.13 03:20:00 - [6] I'm an SWG refugee, and wow did we EVER get screwed :P So far I'm liking Eve, the community is great so far, people have been helping me out even on my first day! O_O People like you rock
Benilopax	Posted - 2005.11.13 03:26:00 - [7] Welcome stumbleduck good to hear we are helping you all out
Graelyn	Posted - 2005.11.13 03:40:00 - [8] Shame what SoE did. Players won't forget it. I hope this will be the death knell of that damned company. Minister of Foreign Affairs - Aegis Militia Fleet Admiral/CEO - The Aeternus Crusade
Christopher Scott	Posted - 2005.11.13 04:06:00 - [9] I would post on that thread and offer links to Eve videos, tutorials, and trial accounts, but even with a station account it won't let me without a SWG sub. That sucks. :-/
TheDeceit	Posted - 2005.11.13 04:17:00 - [10] I've hated SoE ever since they said "Infantry will be free forever" and then maked it P2P a month later. -------- "Yet we still hug the dear Deceit" - N. Cotton
JAG Solra	Posted - 2005.11.13 05:04:00 - [11] I'm an SWG refugee as well.. although I made the move to EVE a few months ago. There will be an adjustment to make, but EVE is a better game overall than SWG, and CCP > SOE without a doubt.
Damaclese	Posted - 2005.11.13 05:37:00 - [12] I didnt even make it through the free 30 day trial when i bought it new it sucked so bad. thats about all the time im gonna waste on swg.
Hoap	Posted - 2005.11.13 06:09:00 - [13] Originally by: JAG Solra I'm an SWG refugee as well.. although I made the move to EVE a few months ago. There will be an adjustment to make, but EVE is a better game overall than SWG, and CCP > SOE without a doubt. Be carefull there with the CCP > SoE, eve is a great game but CCP seems bent on destroying it just like SoE has done to all of theres
Kyle Caldrel	Posted - 2005.11.13 06:19:00 - [14] Originally by: TheDeceit I've hated SoE ever since they said "Infantry will be free forever" and then maked it P2P a month later. Agreed. Infantry was pwnage. NME attacking our base
JAG Solra	Posted - 2005.11.13 06:57:00 - [15] Originally by: Hoap Be carefull there with the CCP > SoE, eve is a great game but CCP seems bent on destroying it just like SoE has done to all of theres So far I haven't seen it.. but then I again I haven't been here long. The main thing that impresses me is the regular posts and blogs from CCP employees that help keep the communication channels open. That in itself is a big part of why I think CCP > SOE
hoaps surgery	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:00:00 - [16] Originally by: JAG Solra Originally by: Hoap Be carefull there with the CCP > SoE, eve is a great game but CCP seems bent on destroying it just like SoE has done to all of theres So far I haven't seen it.. but then I again I haven't been here long. The main thing that impresses me is the regular posts and blogs from CCP employees that help keep the communication channels open. That in itself is a big part of why I think CCP > SOE the problem is that communication is supposed to go both ways, when ccp posts that they are going to change something thats it, it is done, coded, in the can, and no matter how many tell them there going wrong it still happens, examples are the big torp nerf, and the impending drone slaughter.
TheDeceit	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:02:00 - [17] Originally by: Kyle Caldrel Originally by: TheDeceit I've hated SoE ever since they said "Infantry will be free forever" and then maked it P2P a month later. Agreed. Infantry was pwnage. NME attacking our base I remember when they first released the RPG-like server. Everybody ran around with that uber overpowered invisible sniper rifle. That was a fun time. :P -------- "Yet we still hug the dear Deceit" - N. Cotton
SengH	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:04:00 - [18] Infantry was so a Subspace clone.... but with different gfx and theme. I dont think anyone else remembers that game though. Subspace was ******* fun with 150v150 servers and people fortifying bases. Infantry got a bit cheap with the turrets too though.
Corvus Anderran	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:07:00 - [19] Originally by: hoaps surgery Originally by: JAG Solra Originally by: Hoap Be carefull there with the CCP > SoE, eve is a great game but CCP seems bent on destroying it just like SoE has done to all of theres So far I haven't seen it.. but then I again I haven't been here long. The main thing that impresses me is the regular posts and blogs from CCP employees that help keep the communication channels open. That in itself is a big part of why I think CCP > SOE the problem is that communication is supposed to go both ways, when ccp posts that they are going to change something thats it, it is done, coded, in the can, and no matter how many tell them there going wrong it still happens, examples are the big torp nerf, and the impending drone slaughter. Actually the drones are probably a very good example of why that isn't true. If CCP didn't take community feedback on board the damage bonuses would only be to thermal, not all types.
Kyoko Sakoda	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:13:00 - [20] Originally by: Corvus Anderran Actually the drones are probably a very good example of why that isn't true. If CCP didn't take community feedback on board the damage bonuses would only be to thermal, not all types. Entire page long posts with mathmatical calculations and constructive criticisms on missiles were deleted in the first missile nerf thread. We didn't get the response that the drone users got, and that kind of sucks. But I'm over that now, CCP is finally taking another look at missiles, so it's all good.
Hllaxiu	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:15:00 - [21] Originally by: Hoap Originally by: JAG Solra I'm an SWG refugee as well.. although I made the move to EVE a few months ago. There will be an adjustment to make, but EVE is a better game overall than SWG, and CCP > SOE without a doubt. Be carefull there with the CCP > SoE, eve is a great game but CCP seems bent on destroying it just like SoE has done to all of theres Heres the thing though, EVE is all CCP has. Sony has... uh. Lots and lots more than just one MMOG, they can afford to do stupid stuff - CCP can't.
Hoap	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:18:00 - [22] Originally by: Hllaxiu Originally by: Hoap Originally by: JAG Solra I'm an SWG refugee as well.. although I made the move to EVE a few months ago. There will be an adjustment to make, but EVE is a better game overall than SWG, and CCP > SOE without a doubt. Be carefull there with the CCP > SoE, eve is a great game but CCP seems bent on destroying it just like SoE has done to all of theres Heres the thing though, EVE is all CCP has. Sony has... uh. Lots and lots more than just one MMOG, they can afford to do stupid stuff - CCP can't. I agree completely, and yet we watch them do it time after time.
Ras Blumin	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:18:00 - [23] Originally by: hoaps surgery the problem is that communication is supposed to go both ways, when ccp posts that they are going to change something thats it, it is done, coded, in the can, and no matter how many tell them there going wrong it still happens, examples are the big torp nerf, and the impending drone slaughter. A fix and a nerf is not the same. Before the missile fix, there were LOTS of threads whining about how even noob raven pilots wtfpwned most npcs with their torps. 60m Arby sieges? Even I had 4 siege launchers on my tempest coz torps was just soo good. And my pest is still outclassed by the raven for npc'ing, at least for belt hopping in 0.0. p - l - u - r
Futher Bezluden	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:24:00 - [24] The moment CCP sells out to Microsoft, Sony, or some other buttplug console oriented company, that is the precise moment I pull the plug on my account. Do not sell EVE to gimp corps famous for selling packets of KY with their games.
Hoap	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:24:00 - [25] Originally by: Ras Blumin Originally by: hoaps surgery the problem is that communication is supposed to go both ways, when ccp posts that they are going to change something thats it, it is done, coded, in the can, and no matter how many tell them there going wrong it still happens, examples are the big torp nerf, and the impending drone slaughter. A fix and a nerf is not the same. Before the missile fix, there were LOTS of threads whining about how even noob raven pilots wtfpwned most npcs with their torps. 60m Arby sieges? Even I had 4 siege launchers on my tempest coz torps was just soo good. And my pest is still outclassed by the raven for npc'ing, at least for belt hopping in 0.0. I think that is a big problem with mmo's if its more powerfull then something else people cry about it untill it gets nerfed, and the missiles were a nerf, i bet EVERYONE would have been happier if instead of chopping down the missiles they put the effort into making the other guns better, increase the RoF on the large projectile weapons so they can compete, increase the tracking of the large guns so that like the missiles they hit every time. but to backstep anything in an mmo is just stupid, u kill what people know.
Winterblink	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:25:00 - [26] Were the changes being done really THAT bad? I mean the last time I played the game it seemed so horrifyingly bad that I thought it could only get better from there. winterblink warp drive active.http://winterblink.com/wda nature vraie.http://winterblink.com/env
hoaps surgery	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:28:00 - [27] Originally by: Winterblink Were the changes being done really THAT bad? I mean the last time I played the game it seemed so horrifyingly bad that I thought it could only get better from there. 1 word, planetside, there doing exactly what planetside did, and now there is what 200 ppl that still play that game?
Ras Blumin	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:33:00 - [28] Originally by: Hoap I think that is a big problem with mmo's if its more powerfull then something else people cry about it untill it gets nerfed, and the missiles were a nerf, i bet EVERYONE would have been happier if instead of chopping down the missiles they put the effort into making the other guns better, increase the RoF on the large projectile weapons so they can compete, increase the tracking of the large guns so that like the missiles they hit every time. That would make battleships pwn too much. p - l - u - r
Starbauch	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:34:00 - [29] They are changing SWG to a first person shooter. Three years wasted! Been playing Eve for 14 days now. If I'd known this game was here I would have stopped playing SWG years ago. Oh to be a nub again! YAY! And I do believe there will be a substantial amount of players joining EVE from SWG. I know of at least a dozen personally.
hoaps surgery	Posted - 2005.11.13 07:36:00 - [30] Originally by: Ras Blumin Originally by: Hoap I think that is a big problem with mmo's if its more powerfull then something else people cry about it untill it gets nerfed, and the missiles were a nerf, i bet EVERYONE would have been happier if instead of chopping down the missiles they put the effort into making the other guns better, increase the RoF on the large projectile weapons so they can compete, increase the tracking of the large guns so that like the missiles they hit every time. That would make battleships pwn too much. THERE BATTLESHIPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, am i the only one that understands this? pwning is what there supposed to do, right now a damned tristan can sit 5000 meters away shooting me and i cant touch it with my geddon unless i have a small gun, or smarty,

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.