| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 159 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 43 post(s) |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:00:00 -
[721] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Also, WOD content is a far, far cry from Teenvamp Wonderland.  It's more like "I will sleep with you so I can drive your wife insane, rip out your best friends throat, make your children think you are responsible, and then leave you to die a slow death amid the shambles of your life" Wonderland. Edit: Come to think of it, this would make a good template for future Incarna content. 
You never knew me as a teen... 
Actually, I think even the FiSers would like that Incarna!
Issler |

Jita Alt666
950
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:04:00 -
[722] - Quote
Mekela wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:My replies in bold italics: Mekela wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:Agree. Has there been any clear indicator from CCP over the past 18 months showing how it would not be boring? Um are you kidding, lets start with the "future of EVE" add as a starter. Then lets look at the fanfest WiS they presented us. Also all the dev blogs for the last couple years about all the things we were going to be able to do. Things I was really looking forward to -
- Gathering rooms. It would be nice to see a representation of the people you are speaking with on TS or Vent or even Eve speak. Not exciting at all
- Interactive Agents. Getting missions or doing anything with an NPC is about the most boring thing in this game. WiS is a great way to liven things up and to make missions a bit more exciting when you meet in the back alley to discuss the trouble he is asking you to get into.How is talking to an NPC face is more exciting than talking to an NPC window?
- Customization of our avatars, our living quarters , as well as the bars and shops we were going to set up. One of the biggest draw backs for EVE is the confomatity of everything. They finally had a way to allow me to express myself as an individual rather than my ship and 100 other players whos ships that looked exactly like mine as my respresentation. (I still think Eve is stupid to not allow some type of customization for the ships, even if it is just a 2 color adjustment bar letting my ship have my colors rather than exactly the same a every other ship)Customisable Living Quarters Shared Spaces Sure agree Not exactly innovative and exciting though. Customisable ships: This is a Single Shard game (LAG LAG LAG) Uniformity: It takes 6 months to get an Alliance Logo permitted and it has to be done in a uniform manner that fits the Eve Atmospherics - Your issue in this point is not with WIS but with the general feel of the game.
I am sure there are other things that other people were looking forward to but these are the ones on my list. Why do people even play graphical games to start with. I know MUD's still exsist and they have no problem with lag or have graphics that get in the way of your gaming. What I am trying to say is that having a representation is a big deal and adds alot. One of the few good things about Blob warfare is the feeling you get when you see 500+ ships all gathered to gether getting ready for a fight. It feels powerfull to see that many people gathered together to accomplish this goal. Now imagine 500 avatars gathering together for an alliance meeting, that is alot different that watching 1 person type a question in a text box or listening to 1 voice over your headphones. (This is not about Lag or the technical aspects of it but rather things to look foward to. PS we know it is possible to do as I have seen avatars in other games that use less than a single ship rendering in EVE. CCP just decided to reinvent the wheel and it is up to them to find a way to make that wheel work with the tech we have now.) Right now the avatar for agents is meaningless. They could have a single avatar for every single Agent and I doubt some people would even notice. Getting and turning in missions are pretty much completely ignored at this point. By creating an inneractive agent the feeling of missions would change alot. Here is a simple idea of how this could work. - You find an add asking for a ship captain. Walking over to the bartender you ask about the job and he tells you he might know something about it holding out his hand. You slip him and isk and he tells you to go over to the table in the corner and he wishes you luck. The shady fellow in the corner looks you over and then offers you a job of delievering 100 crates of small arms to a station 10 jumps away, he even offers a bonus if you can do it quickly... Now suddenly curiour missions are more exciting more part of a story. Epic story lines will actually feel epic, regular missions can feel more exciting and worth doing. The last point was the fact that WiS is customizable and how that is important to alot of people. What I was trying to say was WiS is a step forward in the right direction and abbandoning WiS is a step backward and I don't believe companys do well when they are not moving foward.
I get what your saying: Pretty things attract people. More realistic interaction is more stimulating. After all that though Flying 20 jumps to drop off a container of arms (10 each way) is still boring.
Regarding alliance meetings; I have been in numerous alliances of many sizes and only twice in 5 years have I been in an alliance meeting where everybody was in same system. While having a sea of avatars in a room would look pretty, it would add little to the game other than looking pretty.
My point is: Substance. What new exciting substance can WIS deliver? If my Avatar was able to walk to a Planetary portal in a station, kit up in dust gear and then get transported onto a DUST planet to fight that FPS game - that would be exciting. If my Avatar was able to enter a bar owned by a rival corp and rough the inhabitants up and get carted away by police to pay some fines - that would be exciting. If my Avatar was able to linger in a dark alley way and mug a courier of his 10 containers of small arms - and then use said containers of small arms - that would be exciting.
The discussion of WIS in this thread is largely limited to the aesthetic and to things already functional in other software. WIS is a concept that needs implementation that adds to the substance of Eve Online.
|

Zleon Leigh
91
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:16:00 -
[723] - Quote
@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital.
CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3133
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:27:00 -
[724] - Quote
The WiS engine simply isn't ready to support gameplay expansions. Deal with it and get over it. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Pent'nor
32
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:48:00 -
[725] - Quote
There are probably a few plans that would make the wis crowd happy because I just want to know what the plan is or know that they have not given up on it.
Plans that include a small team (meaning we are working on it but its not a priority) 1. Move the remaining wod team to wis. (They may have some sort of obligation, I don't know) 2. Keep a small team that can work on some aspect of wis. (Doesn't have to be coding, there are lots of other things too) 3. Keep that art department working on wis since they have said before that it was a bottleneck
Plans that do not require a team. (I don't like these but I would be content to know there is a plan) 1. No progress on wis will be made until they finish dust because it is too many projects 2. No progress on wis until the winter expansion is done, then they will look at balancing development
Plans that I really do not like (I DO NOT support any of these! And would not be happy) 1. Say nothing about wis and leave it in the air because to say what their plan or lack of plan is may result in unsubs. 2. Wis was only meant for wod so when they start large development for wod again, they will look at wis also. 3. They really have no plan and are waiting to see how the playerbase reacts to news of fis only 4. They will come back to wis when they get a certain number of subs 5. They will come back to wis when a few years have gone by 6. They will never come back to wis
No matter what the plan maybe, i would encourage people to NOT unsub because of it, as some kind of protest. Unsubs only hurt the company in a time when they are already having money issues. Support ccp and make your voice known through the forums and if the csm is not addressing your concerns, then next time make sure to vote for one that does. |

Jita Alt666
950
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:52:00 -
[726] - Quote
Pent'nor wrote:There are probably a few plans that would make the wis crowd happy because I just want to know what the plan is or know that they have not given up on it.
Plans that include a small team (meaning we are working on it but its not a priority) 1. Move the remaining wod team to wis. (They may have some sort of obligation, I don't know) 2. Keep a small team that can work on some aspect of wis. (Doesn't have to be coding, there are lots of other things too) 3. Keep that art department working on wis since they have said before that it was a bottleneck
Plans that do not require a team. (I don't like these but I would be content to know there is a plan) 1. No progress on wis will be made until they finish dust because it is too many projects 2. No progress on wis until the winter expansion is done, then they will look at balancing development
Plans that I really do not like (I DO NOT support any of these! And would not be happy) 1. Say nothing about wis and leave it in the air because to say what their plan or lack of plan is may result in unsubs. 2. Wis was only meant for wod so when they start large development for wod again, they will look at wis also. 3. They really have no plan and are waiting to see how the playerbase reacts to news of fis only 4. They will come back to wis when they get a certain number of subs 5. They will come back to wis when a few years have gone by 6. They will never come back to wis
No matter what the plan maybe, i would encourage people to NOT unsub because of it, as some kind of protest. Unsubs only hurt the company in a time when they are already having money issues. Support ccp and make your voice known through the forums and if the csm is not addressing your concerns, then next time make sure to vote for one that does.
Bolded underlined and italiced the typical CCP course of action.
|

Yvan Ratamnim
Phoenix Evolved Part Duo
62
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:53:00 -
[727] - Quote
I have to say, i want WiS badly but done with atleast minimal multiplayer to start.....
But i want WiS as a secondary to FiS... FiS should have priority but there should be a small core team working on WiS development continually atleast get us corp offices and establishments. |

Kengutsi Akira
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
372
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:56:00 -
[728] - Quote
Ranka Mei wrote:Kengutsi Akira wrote:[..]Its just the ppl that are now crying cause they shelved WiS that are pissing me off. Why would you be pissed off by them? WiS lovers (yours truly included) were promised WiS. Very emphatically, for months. By Hilmar himself, and every other high-up CCP employee. In fact, you couldn't use a crowbar to beat the idea out of them, even if you tried. WiS was coming, to a theatre near us very soon, and no amount of arguing was ever gonna change their mind. Then, all of a sudden, it's like: "Nope, changed my mind! You're not getting WiS after all. We'll deploy the bits and pieces we already have done, for good measure, and then we'll shelve the lot (and since we don't ever finish the stuff we do promise to complete even, you realize, of course, you can kiss WiS goodbye, right?)." So, I ask, who has cause to be pissed? Or at the very least has cause to ask CCP to undue this mindjob they just pulled on us, and, I dunno, keep a promise for a change.
yet another WiS-er that ignores the fact that they had to drop 20% of the staff FOR A REASON AND that you got two years of non stop attention while FiS SAT.
You should be grateful they didnt rip what you HAVE of WiS out of the game instead of them working on it after the work on FiS (That theyve neglected, again for two years to work on WiS)
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=255722#post255722
My stance on WiS |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
127
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:59:00 -
[729] - Quote
Mekela wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:Agree. Has there been any clear indicator from CCP over the past 18 months showing how it would not be boring? Um are you kidding, lets start with the "future of EVE" add as a starter. Then lets look at the fanfest WiS they presented us. Also all the dev blogs for the last couple years about all the things we were going to be able to do. Things I was really looking forward to -
- Gathering rooms. It would be nice to see a representation of the people you are speaking with on TS or Vent or even Eve speak.
- Interactive Agents. Getting missions or doing anything with an NPC is about the most boring thing in this game. WiS is a great way to liven things up and to make missions a bit more exciting when you meet in the back alley to discuss the trouble he is asking you to get into.
- Customization of our avatars, our living quarters , as well as the bars and shops we were going to set up. One of the biggest draw backs for EVE is the confomatity of everything. They finally had a way to allow me to express myself as an individual rather than my ship and 100 other players whos ships that looked exactly like mine as my respresentation. (I still think Eve is stupid to not allow some type of customization for the ships, even if it is just a 2 color adjustment bar letting my ship have my colors rather than exactly the same a every other ship)
I am sure there are other things that other people were looking forward to but these are the ones on my list.
They tried. They failed.
get over it
Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
127
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 23:04:00 -
[730] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote: Was Very sad to see FIS put aside.
I think the decisions at the top of CCP screwed their plans, not the actual things that were happening. They really failed to make the players happy due to rushed decisions and arrogant execution.
fixt
Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
127
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 23:05:00 -
[731] - Quote
Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes
apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry.
Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 23:30:00 -
[732] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry.
If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point.
Issler |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
127
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 23:32:00 -
[733] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry. If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point. Issler
yeah.... cause likes matter
as someone said earlier, 1000 pages in three day, significant. 500 in 5 days not so, especially when half that number are nay sayers or alts Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1225
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 00:19:00 -
[734] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry. If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point. Issler yeah.... cause likes matter as someone said earlier, 1000 pages in three day, significant. 500 in 5 days not so, especially when half that number are nay sayers or alts
I personally don't put a lot of emphasis on the number of "likes" in a thread, but at least it doesn't have none. 
I do feel the need to point out that a large number of the posts in that thread were nay sayers (believe it or not), and a HUGE number of them were blatant troll posts (by people that freely admitted they were trolling both sides for maximum effect).
But you are quite right, the people that hope Incarna won't be permanently shelved are not as emotionally invested as those who spoke out against the incredible string of screw ups going on at the time of Incarna's release... thank god.  I have absolutely no desire to go through something like that again.
By the same token, most people advocating in favor of WIS content are not asking for CCP to scrap their FIS plans for the Winter release... or even change them.
Many simply want to let CCP know that they still like the concept, and to please not shelve it completely. Instead devote a sensible portion of resources to it when they can, actually develop a sensible framework of appropriate content for it that whenever possible enhances FIS content, and above all don't gimp FIS content development unduly in the process this time.
Make a plan, make sure it's a good plan, check with us to get confirmation it's a good plan, and THEN start work developing it.
When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

Jita Alt666
950
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 01:49:00 -
[735] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry. If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point. Issler yeah.... cause likes matter as someone said earlier, 1000 pages in three day, significant. 500 in 5 days not so, especially when half that number are nay sayers or alts
That was me. For accuracy I was referring to the Incarna feedback thread which reached some 12000 replies in 3 days where as this thread is on 520ish after 5 days |

Lord Wiggin
Phantom Squad Nulli Secunda
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 02:17:00 -
[736] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:The WiS engine simply isn't ready to support gameplay expansions. Deal with it and get over it.
Which is what makes it really sad....for four years they have been promising WIS....and they apparently still can't deliver it.  It's no wonder that some people are still on the fence, their track record of implementing major changes is not very good. 
|

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
127
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 03:45:00 -
[737] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry. If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point. Issler yeah.... cause likes matter as someone said earlier, 1000 pages in three day, significant. 500 in 5 days not so, especially when half that number are nay sayers or alts That was me. For accuracy I was referring to the Incarna feedback thread which reached some 12000 replies in 3 days where as this thread is on 520ish after 5 days
I think the first guy was referring to real threadnaughts IE "an open letter to CCP" during T20
Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
215
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 03:56:00 -
[738] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry. If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point. Issler The likes system doesn't work that way, a lot of the 'likes' in this thread are actually for posts against WiS. Out of 1035 likes (at time of posting) there are only 86 for your original post.
If you wanted to be accurate then you would have to tally up both the positive and negative 'likes' in this thread.
The total likes for this thread overall is not a good barometer for positive interest in WiS content. Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

Captain Alcatraz
Douchingtons Shadow Cartel
69
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 04:08:00 -
[739] - Quote
WiS is cool if it includes smuggling, black market, establishments, bars etc.
Not so cool if it's a single player room that doubles the client ram usage and that burns CPUs.
To reach its fully featured and functional state, it will have taken 10x the amount of work required to build the same amount of features for the space game, as they have to build the tech from scratch as they develop it. And in the end it dosnt add much if anything to the core of the game, it's a world on its own. That's the problem of WIS. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
127
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 06:14:00 -
[740] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry. If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point. Issler The likes system doesn't work that way, a lot of the 'likes' in this thread are actually for posts against WiS. Out of 1035 likes (at time of posting) there are only 86 for your original post. If you wanted to be accurate then you would have to tally up both the positive and negative 'likes' in this thread. The total likes for this thread overall is not a good barometer for positive interest in WiS content.
roflmao 86/1035
yeah a "majority"
Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |

Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries
82
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 06:45:00 -
[741] - Quote
I read this thread, then I go and read Hilmar's groveling apology.
People simple will not learn, nor wake up and smell the coffee. I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg
CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused. |

Hershman
Creeper Collective
144
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 07:01:00 -
[742] - Quote
Pent'nor wrote:There are probably a few plans that would make the wis crowd happy because I just want to know what the plan is or know that they have not given up on it.
Plans that include a small team (meaning we are working on it but its not a priority) 1. Move the remaining wod team to wis. (They may have some sort of obligation, I don't know) 2. Keep a small team that can work on some aspect of wis. (Doesn't have to be coding, there are lots of other things too) 3. Keep that art department working on wis since they have said before that it was a bottleneck
Plans that do not require a team. (I don't like these but I would be content to know there is a plan) 1. No progress on wis will be made until they finish dust because it is too many projects 2. No progress on wis until the winter expansion is done, then they will look at balancing development
Plans that I really do not like (I DO NOT support any of these! And would not be happy) 1. Say nothing about wis and leave it in the air because to say what their plan or lack of plan is may result in unsubs. 2. Wis was only meant for wod so when they start large development for wod again, they will look at wis also. 3. They really have no plan and are waiting to see how the playerbase reacts to news of fis only 4. They will come back to wis when they get a certain number of subs 5. They will come back to wis when a few years have gone by 6. They will never come back to wis
No matter what the plan maybe, i would encourage people to NOT unsub because of it, as some kind of protest. Unsubs only hurt the company in a time when they are already having money issues. Support ccp and make your voice known through the forums and if the csm is not addressing your concerns, then next time make sure to vote for one that does.
I agree with you wholeheartedly. News of WiS being handled by a specialist team would be magnificent. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1225
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 07:50:00 -
[743] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:I read this thread, then I go and read Hilmar's groveling apology.
People simple will not learn, nor wake up and smell the coffee.
Well, actually they do learn.
When you do something the wrong way and fail, if that thing was worthwhile you learn from your mistakes and go back and do it correctly the next time.
A lot of people think the WIS concept was worthwhile, and would like it to be revisited when possible... but this time with an appropriate plan in pace ahead of time to do it correctly and not stomp on FIS content development in the process.
Mmmmm, that coffee smells good....  When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 10:03:00 -
[744] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry. If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point. Issler yeah.... cause likes matter as someone said earlier, 1000 pages in three day, significant. 500 in 5 days not so, especially when half that number are nay sayers or alts That was me. For accuracy I was referring to the Incarna feedback thread which reached some 12000 replies in 3 days where as this thread is on 520ish after 5 days
So everyone that seems to like to point out the huge backlash after Incarna has to acknowledge that this was a result that after years of promise of awesome WiS coming soon (tm) we got one room and the only single player per room MMO in the 'verse. What we got was NOTHING like what we were promised. It was the I got you a pony and instead we got a steaming pile of pony droppings.
So now CCP says that four piles of pony droppings is in fact the Incarna we always were promised by CCP "now shut up and play with your ponies!"
Oh, and why this is all the Incarna you will ever get is because you have told us you hate ponies.
You also have to admit that since the forums changed threadnaughts are different. This is with out a doubt one of the most active threads "new forum".
I don't know why but for some reason old forum threads were bigger than new forums ones.
Issler
|

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 10:23:00 -
[745] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry. If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point. Issler yeah.... cause likes matter as someone said earlier, 1000 pages in three day, significant. 500 in 5 days not so, especially when half that number are nay sayers or alts
But half the numbers in this thread when you go back and remove the same negative poster that posted the same thing over and over aren't against WiS. Most of the thread when you filter the same haters that post over and over want CCP to say some form of WiS is still in plan after this expansion.
This reply should also be considered a reply to the other recent posters that basically said the same thing.
Bottom line, I didn't ask for WiS over FiS. I asked for folks to post here to tell Hilmar that a lot of us want WiS to keep being worked on in parallel to FiS going forward. That seemed to open the door for a lot of intellectually limited folk to get to explain to us how getting out of their ships confuses and frightens them. It also seemed to let a lot of closetted barbie fans to post anti-barbie sentiment to try and an hide their secret dress up fetishness.
So this thread should be making my point to CCP, many of us want WiS back in plan and want CCP to tell us it will be worked on after this expansion. To folks that the idea of WiS still happening threatens them all I can say is "F" you, we WiS fans pay our subscriptions too and if Eve is to survive WiS has to happen.
CCP, get WiS back in plan and get rich! Pretty simple!
Issler
P.S. Stop comparing old forum post numbers to new forum post numbers! The lameness of the new forums seem to make that impossible. The new forums are just too unstable to compare the two. |

Zendoren
Aktaeon Industries The Black Armada
70
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 11:50:00 -
[746] - Quote
Jill Xelitras wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Reading the CCP CEO interview I was taken by this comment.
"but the voice of the community is quite clear. People want more spaceships, and more flying in space features. That's very much what we are responding to. " Issler No Hilmar, we don't want more spaceships. We want you to fix the current ones ! You may even want to release the promised ones. And then we want you to walk over to your marketing department and tell them to stop telling everybody that "walking in stations" has been finally released until it really is ready to be released on TQ. I saw Torfi walking a character through a bar and playing a cool game ... Now go and make that happen ! That's when you should start marketing WIS. Also, I'm very surprised (although I shouldn't be) that it took you until NOW to figure out that PI could be used to make low-sec interesting ... really CCP ? After all those years ? I wonder why I keep paying.
GTFO of MY EvE Online!!!!
Fix old content or bust. We want internet Spaceships in our internet spaceship game.....
If you want barbies online, go play 2nd life! G¥Æ Single G¥Æ Taken G£ö Playing EVE Online
CCP Guard > Where's the shoot button on this thing? CCP Space Cadet > What's this "offline guns" button do? http://tinyurl.com/dxwseds |

T-Jay Charante
The Scope Gallente Federation
30
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 12:24:00 -
[747] - Quote
Zendoren wrote:Jill Xelitras wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Reading the CCP CEO interview I was taken by this comment.
"but the voice of the community is quite clear. People want more spaceships, and more flying in space features. That's very much what we are responding to. " Issler No Hilmar, we don't want more spaceships. We want you to fix the current ones ! You may even want to release the promised ones. And then we want you to walk over to your marketing department and tell them to stop telling everybody that "walking in stations" has been finally released until it really is ready to be released on TQ. I saw Torfi walking a character through a bar and playing a cool game ... Now go and make that happen ! That's when you should start marketing WIS. Also, I'm very surprised (although I shouldn't be) that it took you until NOW to figure out that PI could be used to make low-sec interesting ... really CCP ? After all those years ? I wonder why I keep paying. GTFO of MY EvE Online!!!! Fix old content or bust. We want internet Spaceships in our internet spaceship game..... If you want barbies online, go play 2nd life!
Everyone should indeed take this guys advice. EvE is old and stale, the sooner people leave and let it die, the quicker some competent gaming company can make a complete sci-fi simulator, not just a bad Elite clone.
|

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1256
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 13:11:00 -
[748] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:OP posted a thread with the title - Quote:CCP! A lot of us want WiS OP stated in it - Quote:So if you wanted WiS please post in this thread because I think a lot of us want CCP to deliver more of what they have promised use for years now. Just exactly which part of this do you nay sayers not understand?This thread was made for players to show their positive support for WiS. It didn't say anything about supporting NEX or abandoning FiS. It didn't say spam your negative opinions or bad attitudes here. It didn't say post unsubstantiated rumors or rough estimates or to speculate on reasons. The funny thing about this is you stubborn nay sayers just don't get it. Every time you post a negative reply, another positive reply gets posted. Thanks to that this thread is turning into a threadnaught. It probably would have died out already if you didn't keep posting here. Bottom line: Other than fixing all the problems and finishing existing game content, there isn't that many options left available to add new game content to FiS. Everyone needs to accept the fact that in order for Eve Online to survive and grow it needs to change by expanding it's current game content. The combination of DUST and EVE with FiS and WiS will accomplish that. We the players need to change our mind set and be open to that change. To those that can't adapt, go jump into the nearest Bio-Vat and be done with it. Firstly. This is a public forum accessible for all subscribers of Eve Online. This sub forum is General Discussion. It is not designed as forum for building a consensus of ideas (there are other sub forums for that). It is not designed as a forum for genteel discussion from a specific user group. It is open to anyone to express any view on any topic started which does not breach the Forum Rules. tl:dr: Don't tell people what to post and what not to post. Secondly: Content can be expanded in numerous ways both in FIS and WIS anyone who claims either doesn't have a future is being narrow minded. An integrated approach will have the most wow factor and make for the most dynamic playing environment. tl:dr: A black and white viewpoint is stupid whatever position you hold in an arguement Thirdly: Eve Online is not surviving? You are theory crafting. You are theory crafting after telling others they are not allowed to theory craft. tl:dr:  Lastly: I came to this thread as an individual putting my mouth forward to say: "CCP please don't abandon WIS, I understand you have financial issues and are trying to get your house in order, but please keep the door open on this development" Reading this thread however I find a lack of rationality and pragmatism, by a subset of posters who are hypocritical in nature. tl:dr: this thread is a petty in fight not a discussion of how WIS is positive. PS: this is not a thread naught. 12000 posts in 3 days is a thread naught. 500 posts in 5 days is not.
Go back to school and learn reading comprehension. Twisting my statements around in an attempt to justify your self-righteous attitude is fail troll.
Firstly - OP asked for only those who wanted WiS to please post in this thread. Doesn't matter what you think, any anti-WiS reply or negative personal attacks against those who post support for WiS could be considered, per Forum Rules, as flaming and trolling in an attempt to derail thread and cause Flame war. As per Forum rules, that alone could be used as reason for removal of said posted replies..
Secondly - My statement >'Other than fixing all the problems and finishing existing game content, there isn't that many options left available to add new game content to FiS.< I never posted against FiS. This thread isn't about adding new FiS game content but since you want to make my statement about it an issue, please enlighten me with a few of your ideas pertaining to new game content strictly for FiS.
Thirdly - Again you twist my statements around and portray them out of context. My statement > 'Everyone needs to accept the fact that in order for Eve Online to survive and grow it needs to change by expanding it's current game content.'< I'm not gonna list all the details/events or go into 'Theory Crafting' as to why, but when a company does internal restructuring and changes it's direction, shelves projects and does mass personnel lay-offs, it's hurting.
Lastly - If you indeed wanted to post support for WiS, you wouldn't have adopted a self-righteous attitude and twisted the context of my post into something completely different. Your statement > "CCP please don't abandon WIS, I understand you have financial issues and are trying to get your house in order, but please keep the door open on this development"< is hypocritical when compared to the other statements listed in this and your other posted replies.
P.S. Again you twist my statement around and portray it out of context. My statement >'Thanks to that this thread is turning into a thread-naught'< I never said it is a thread-naught. 'Turning into' and 'is' are 2 different things. Also comparing the new forums to the old forums is like comparing Apples to Oranges. Both are completely different entities.
|

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
127
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 13:51:00 -
[749] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:
P.S. Stop comparing old forum post numbers to new forum post numbers! The lameness of the new forums seem to make that impossible. The new forums are just too unstable to compare the two.
Issler Dainze wrote: You also have to admit that since the forums changed threadnaughts are different. This is with out a doubt one of the most active threads "new forum".
I don't know why but for some reason old forum threads were bigger than new forums ones.
"Stop doing what Im doing its making me look bad!"
YOU bring up the comparison then try to get ppl to stop the comparison cause its not going your way Kinda like this thread.
Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
127
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 13:53:00 -
[750] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:stuff
Firstly, you fail at understanding forums Secondly, you fail at understanding forums Thirdly, you fail at understanding forums Lastly, you fail at understanding forums
P.S. you fail at understanding forums Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 159 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |