Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Noriko Mai
893
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 23:24:00 -
[121] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Noriko Mai wrote:I think it would make sense to change it so you have to cover at least the min buy amount. Thats all. GǪwhich again would only really hurt legitimate traders. Also, the fundamental question remains: why does it need to be changed in any way to begin with? GǣBecause scams!Gǥ is not an answer to that question. I have a trade char, too. In my opinion it is a broken mechaic if there are orders in the market that are not covered for at least the minimum amount. I never fall for a scan in the market, so thats no point for me. It's my opinion and I can bring no hard facts why it should be like I say. I know "this is eve" "htfu", etc... I think the point for me is, that the market must not be somekind of a gambling place where you never know if not atleast the minimum amount can be sold to a buy order. Again, for me this is no problem at all, but I can fully understand the disappointment of new players that see a buy order, get the stuff and then the buy order disapears while they try fill it.
Nevermind, it's late. Good night everyone. |
|

CCP Falcon
3418

|
Posted - 2013.07.08 23:27:00 -
[122] - Quote
Margin trading is not considered an exploit.
However, if you do run into a legitimate exploit in game, feel free to file a support ticked via the F12 menu in game.
Alternatively, if you dislike margin trading and would like to suggest changes, please feel free to speak to the CSM, or post suggestions for changes in the Features & Ideas Discussion Forum. CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Team -á || -á EVE Illuminati -á || -á Live Events Organizer
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
15406
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 23:30:00 -
[123] - Quote
Noriko Mai wrote:In my opinion it is a broken mechaic if there are orders in the market that are not covered for at least the minimum amount. How so?
Quote:I think the point for me is, that the market must not be somekind of a gambling place where you never know if not atleast the minimum amount can be sold to a buy order. GǪbut that's what make markets fun. And again, from the seller's point of view, it's really no different than if someone else sniped the buy order or the buyer cancelled it for whatever reason. Just because an order was there a second ago doesn't mean it'll be there when you click the GÇ£sellGÇ¥ button GÇö that's just inherent to how the market works.
Unless it's from an NPC, market orders are not guaranteed (and even then, the price may have changed by the time you try to make a deal due to what other players have done). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
2846
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 23:38:00 -
[124] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Margin trading is not considered an exploit.
There you have it folks.
/thread
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Frying Doom
2507
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 00:55:00 -
[125] - Quote
The only think I find broken in all of this is that people have effectively agreed to pay an amount, that they don't actually have.
And the bank doesn't slap them with a huge fee.
I mean come on a bit of reality here, they should be handed huge bills from the bank and have their trading shut down until they pay the bank.
Lets face it, banks know how to make money and if scamming is acceptable in EvE why wouldn't the banks do it.
 Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

GreenSeed
547
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 01:10:00 -
[126] - Quote
Margin trading is a legitimate tool, it cant even be used to scam. since selling to a buy order with no backing results on your item being returned to you.
how is that a scam? you still get to keep the item...
the point is, you weren't scammed when you couldn't sell the item, you were scammed when you bought it. so, should we make it so its impossible to sell items above median price?
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Balius and Xanthus Traditional Gunsmiths
9854
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 01:12:00 -
[127] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:The only think I find broken in all of this is that people have effectively agreed to pay an amount, that they don't actually have. And the bank doesn't slap them with a huge fee. I mean come on a bit of reality here, they should be handed huge bills from the bank and have their trading shut down until they pay the bank. Lets face it, banks know how to lose money and if scamming is acceptable in EvE why wouldn't the banks do it.  FTFY
Why shouldn't we be able to rob people of their valuables for profit? |

Frying Doom
2507
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 01:42:00 -
[128] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Frying Doom wrote:The only think I find broken in all of this is that people have effectively agreed to pay an amount, that they don't actually have. And the bank doesn't slap them with a huge fee. I mean come on a bit of reality here, they should be handed huge bills from the bank and have their trading shut down until they pay the bank. Lets face it, banks know how to lose money and if scamming is acceptable in EvE why wouldn't the banks do it.  FTFY My apologies I was referring to the worlds leading scammers, Australian banks for example not US banks. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Freakdevil
Aliastra Gallente Federation
25
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 02:02:00 -
[129] - Quote
Think of this problem as an advanced form of marketplace PVP. Helps to keep the traders frosty.
Besides traders usually have too much isk anyway. Think of this as the equivalent of the cloak warp trick. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3603
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 02:10:00 -
[130] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:The only think I find broken in all of this is that people have effectively agreed to pay an amount, that they don't actually have.
They have done no such thing. You're confusing an offer to treat with a contract.
Quote:And the bank doesn't slap them with a huge fee.
They are. A failed margin order costs you the broker fees while you receive no goods.
Quote:I mean come on a bit of reality here, they should be handed huge bills from the bank and have their trading shut down until they pay the bank. Lets face it, banks know how to make money and if scamming is acceptable in EvE why wouldn't the banks do it. 
Where in this process do you see the banks being involved? Banks are involved in RL margin trading because it involves trading with borrowed money. In EVE, there's no money being borrowed, so no banks involved. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |
|

Frying Doom
2507
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 03:53:00 -
[131] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:The only think I find broken in all of this is that people have effectively agreed to pay an amount, that they don't actually have. They have done no such thing. You're confusing an offer to treat with a contract. Quote:And the bank doesn't slap them with a huge fee. They are. A failed margin order costs you the broker fees while you receive no goods. Quote:I mean come on a bit of reality here, they should be handed huge bills from the bank and have their trading shut down until they pay the bank. Lets face it, banks know how to make money and if scamming is acceptable in EvE why wouldn't the banks do it.  Where in this process do you see the banks being involved? Banks are involved in RL margin trading because it involves trading with borrowed money. In EVE, there's no money being borrowed, so no banks involved. Yes your wallet balance and transactions are not conducted by a third party at all. 
A failed order cost is hardly a cost, as you would still pay it on a successful order.
Hit them with a fine. It would make at least for a funny isk sink. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
6095
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 03:55:00 -
[132] - Quote
Utzam wrote:BoSau Hotim wrote: GÇób. Intentionally creates contracts that cannot be completed through normal game mechanics or abilities.
This makes a remarkably clear case that margin trade scamming is against the rules. The current system protects those who abuse margin trading by withholding information relating to buy/sell orders. Buy/sell orders should not be special cased in favor of the scammers. Simple solutions do exist to this problem.
Reread the post. This was talking about CONTRACTS. No mention of buy orders here.
If Margin trading scams were against the rules and considered an exploit then it would CLEARLY state that.
it does not
try again
you 'fair and balanced' people need to leave Eve.. it's not for you. I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE!-á Now... where's Ken? |

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
6096
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 04:00:00 -
[133] - Quote
Utzam wrote:An agreement between two or more parties, especially one that is written and enforceable by law.
Buy orders certainly qualify as contracts by any reasonable definition. I wouldn't confine yourself to such a static rule set. Laws change all the time, and it's about time CCP fixed this.
NO. Buy orders are not contracts in EvE. Your layman's legal jargon won't fly here as this is EvE and not some courtroom irl.
It's about time you realize EvE is about pvp in legit scamming also.
I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE!-á Now... where's Ken? |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3604
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 04:26:00 -
[134] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Yes your wallet balance and transactions are not conducted by a third party at all.  A failed order cost is hardly a cost, as you would still pay it on a successful order. Hit them with a fine. It would make at least for a funny isk sink.
No, they're conducted by brokers. Who are paid in fixed fees.
The Broker's fees are a cost in both instances. The failed order fails to provide you with the benefit (the transaction) you paid your broker for.
Again, they are hit with a fine. They do not get the benefit normally received from paying the broker's fees, so those fees are wasted.
Besides that: 1) Nobody (besides the person whose buy order failed) hurt by a failed buy order, so why fine someone for something that doesn't hurt anyone? 2) The character you're suggesting fining is insolvent. They have no ISK to take (otherwise the order would be filled). So how would you fine them? This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
6096
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 04:39:00 -
[135] - Quote
Rroff wrote:I have mixed feelings on this, as someone who has been playing eve for quite awhile they are usually painfully obvious to spot... however for a new player its often something they can't anticipate - no amount of careful diligence within the scope of the mechanic (from their perspective) itself reveals the potential flaw there which to me pretty much makes it an exploit.
On the flipside, more by luck than judgement, I've made a fair bit of ISK from either lucky timing or when someones set it up wrong and I happen to already have the item(s) in question.
According to CCP, it is not an exploit.
Check here for definition of scamming and exploit per CCP
Here is part of it:
Exploits
An exploit is when someone bypasses normal game mechanics, such as by utilizing a bug in the game, allowing him to take advantage of other players without them having any means of preventing it whatsoever. When this occurs, we implore you to contact your friendly neighbourhood GM as soon as possible so that they can investigate the incident, prevent it from happening to anyone else, and possibly reimburse you for your loss: While in the game, select the "Help" function from your NeoCom. Press the "Petitions" button, then "New Petitions". Select the "exploit" category and press "Ok", then write as detailed a description as you can, including if possible the exact circumstances under which the cheat or exploit can be reproduced, and whether you know of any players who have been taking advantage of it.
My point is: Even though new people may fall for a scam more readily than a more experienced player it still is not considered and exploit by CCP.
There aren't any normal game mechanics that are being bypassed here. The game mechanics are being used to create a scam just as all scamming does basically. There is no bug here to report, or scenario to be reported to the GM's. They already know about it and it is acceptable to CCP, so there is no exploit being used. I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE!-á Now... where's Ken? |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2528
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 04:41:00 -
[136] - Quote
if it wasn't for scamming how else could I get rich? 
|

The Marketer
Secure IT
11
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 05:30:00 -
[137] - Quote
There are for sure many items I dont know the regular price. Today I looked at a faction item which has no sell order or contract advertised in Jita local. It only had a single item buy order of 1B. At first I thought it was a margin trading scam like many others. I could have looked at the history to determine if this was the regular price but was too lazy and moved on.
The thing is, the margin trading scam in his current form makes even a decent old char like me to not trust the market. I can imagine what it can do to newbies and I am sure many newbies would even quit EVE after falling for such scam with their hard earned ISK. If I had fallen for such trick back in time when I had my first billion, for sure I would have loose faith in the market and may have quit the game.
In his current form, Margin trading can only benefits scammers and manipulates badly the market. It is a broken mechanic. In real life, such behaviors would result in some sort of punishment. In Eve, the player can exploit it as long as he want.
If CCP still wants to support that broken and useless skill/mechanic, they should make on or more of the next modifications in my opinion:
If a margin trading buy order Minimum trading volume does not even permit any transaction of the amount of ISK currently available in ESCROW, then the order should instantly vanished. That would fix all problems. Easy, logic, you have an order and cant fill the minimum of it, its out. Simple.
Margin trading orders should be identified in some way, telling the other player that the order may not go through. This would avoid also the other bad effects of MT with seasoned players for other legitimate products: those buy order that are used to manipulate the market to raise the legitimate buy order who follows it back.
Implement some consequences if you fail to complete a MT order, there are many ways to do this.
This is my opinion and no I havent fall for a MT scam. (English is my second language)
TM |

Jonah Gravenstein
Balius and Xanthus Traditional Gunsmiths
9863
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 05:40:00 -
[138] - Quote
The Marketer wrote: In his current form, Margin trading can only benefits scammers and manipulates badly the market. It is a broken mechanic. In real life, such behaviors would result in some sort of punishment. In Eve, the player can exploit it as long as he want.
Margin trading benefits legitimate traders far more than it benefits scammers, 99% of orders placed using the skill are completely legitimate and probably constitute 90% of the buy orders on the market, the scams are very much in the minority. In real life behaviours such as market manipulation and failing to deliver on a promise are often rewarded by fat bonus's and bailouts, not punishment.
"Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad." |

Ellie Katelo
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 05:44:00 -
[139] - Quote
This is definitely an exploit and I plan on exploiting it. |

The Marketer
Secure IT
11
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 05:45:00 -
[140] - Quote
I hear you. I may be wrong but can you also comment on my proposed solution since you seems to know about it?
If a margin trading buy order Minimum trading volume does not even permit any transaction of the amount of ISK currently available in ESCROW, then the order should instantly vanished. That would fix all problems. Easy, logic, you have an order and cant fill the minimum of it, its out. Simple.
|
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Balius and Xanthus Traditional Gunsmiths
9875
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 05:56:00 -
[141] - Quote
The Marketer wrote:I hear you. I may be wrong but can you also comment on my proposed solution since you seems to know about it?
If a margin trading buy order Minimum trading volume does not even permit any transaction of the amount of ISK currently available in ESCROW, then the order should instantly vanished. That would fix all problems. Easy, logic, you have an order and cant fill the minimum of it, its out. Simple.
I don't see a problem tbh, I'm often on the borderline of not having enough isk to fulfil a buy order, I play the odds that my sell orders will provide the isk I need to fulfil the buy order. If the odds don't come through then my buy order disappears when someone tries to sell to it, generally there's plenty of other traders willing to purchase the same things I'm buying.
All your proposed solution does is screw me and every other trader who's playing the odds. Admittedly it would probably screw the scammers as well, but it's akin to using a steamroller to iron your clothes when an iron will do the job.
"Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad." |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3604
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 06:06:00 -
[142] - Quote
The Marketer wrote:I hear you. I may be wrong but can you also comment on my proposed solution since you seems to know about it?
If a margin trading buy order Minimum trading volume does not even permit any transaction of the amount of ISK currently available in ESCROW, then the order should instantly vanished. That would fix all problems. Easy, logic, you have an order and cant fill the minimum of it, its out. Simple.
1) Escrow is always depleted first, so your proposal would result in "legitimate" margin orders always vanishing after ~25% of the order being filled. 2) You can sell things to buy orders at prices lower than they're offering. (This means you can steal the escrow out from a margin order if you're more clever than they are.) So you can virtually always complete a transaction for the amount of ISK remaining in Escrow. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
6096
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 06:32:00 -
[143] - Quote
The Marketer wrote:There are for sure many items I dont know the regular price. Today I looked at a faction item which has no sell order or contract advertised in Jita local. It only had a single item buy order of 1B. At first I thought it was a margin trading scam like many others. I could have looked at the history to determine if this was the regular price but was too lazy and moved on.
The thing is, the margin trading scam in his current form makes even a decent old char like me to not trust the market. I can imagine what it can do to newbies and I am sure many newbies would even quit EVE after falling for such scam with their hard earned ISK. If I had fallen for such trick back in time when I had my first billion, for sure I would have loose faith in the market and may have quit the game.
In his current form, Margin trading can only benefits scammers and manipulates badly the market. It is a broken mechanic. In real life, such behaviors would result in some sort of punishment. In Eve, the player can exploit it as long as he want.
If CCP still wants to support that broken and useless skill/mechanic, they should make on or more of the next modifications in my opinion:
If a margin trading buy order Minimum trading volume does not even permit any transaction of the amount of ISK currently available in ESCROW, then the order should instantly vanished. That would fix all problems. Easy, logic, you have an order and cant fill the minimum of it, its out. Simple.
Margin trading orders should be identified in some way, telling the other player that the order may not go through. This would avoid also the other bad effects of MT with seasoned players for other legitimate products: those buy order that are used to manipulate the market to raise the legitimate buy order who follows it back.
Implement some consequences if you fail to complete a MT order, there are many ways to do this.
This is my opinion and no I havent fall for a MT scam. (English is my second language)
TM
Yet, there are many of us who say it is not broken or useless, and allowing scammers is all part of the EvE experience. For many of us warning players that it may be a margin trading scam is like CCP making all gankers anounce that they are about to blow up a retriever in system that is quietly mining. Where does it stop then? Do we need to anounce every contract scam? every time someone is going to quietly steal all assets in a POS? Most noobs dont' know about those things, do they need to be officially warned before it happens? These are just questions I am putting out there for you to think about. 
Someone has mentioned this before and I am repeating it. When it is stated that this is a PvP game, they are not just talking about blowing up ships, it is also PvP in the market too.
I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE!-á Now... where's Ken? |

Frying Doom
2507
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 06:36:00 -
[144] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Yes your wallet balance and transactions are not conducted by a third party at all.  A failed order cost is hardly a cost, as you would still pay it on a successful order. Hit them with a fine. It would make at least for a funny isk sink. No, they're conducted by brokers. Who are paid in fixed fees. The Broker's fees are a cost in both instances. The failed order fails to provide you with the benefit (the transaction) you paid your broker for. Again, they are hit with a fine. They do not get the benefit normally received from paying the broker's fees, so those fees are wasted. Besides that: 1) Nobody (besides the person whose buy order failed) hurt by a failed buy order, so why fine someone for something that doesn't hurt anyone? 2) The character you're suggesting fining is insolvent. They have no ISK to take (otherwise the order would be filled). So how would you fine them? 1)The moron who fell for the over inflated buy order is hurt. 2) Does your bank fine you if you are insolvent? Of course they do, you overdraw, you get hit with a fee, You write a bad cheque, you get hit with a fee. Now you suddenly get money in your account, who gets paid first....The bank.
The brokers fee is for placing the order, which they did and got paid for. Not having the funds there you are not penalized for in any way, and you should be...Mostly so we can see a massive influx of scammers tears  Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
518
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 06:54:00 -
[145] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: 1)The moron who fell for the over inflated buy order is hurt.
The moron hurt himself when he purchased goods at above market value. The buy order is irrelevant.
A fool and his money are soon parted. Rifterlings Corporation is now recruiting pilots for faction warfare solo & small gang frigate PvP. Visit our website at www.rifterlings.com or join our in game channel weflyrifters to speak to a recruiter. |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
518
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 06:55:00 -
[146] - Quote
BoSau Hotim wrote:Do we need to anounce every contract scam?
Personally, I announce all of my contract scams. The stupid and the naive have a harder time blundering into them otherwise. Rifterlings Corporation is now recruiting pilots for faction warfare solo & small gang frigate PvP. Visit our website at www.rifterlings.com or join our in game channel weflyrifters to speak to a recruiter. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3604
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 06:59:00 -
[147] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:1)The moron who fell for the over inflated buy order is hurt.
They still have their stuff. The price they paid for the items is irrelevant to the question of whether or not they're hurt by their inability to sell their goods to a specific market order.
Quote:2) Does your bank fine you if you are insolvent? Of course they do, you overdraw, you get hit with a fee, You write a bad cheque, you get hit with a fee. Now you suddenly get money in your account, who gets paid first....The bank. The brokers fee is for placing the order, which they did and got paid for. Not having the funds there you are not penalized for in any way, and you should be...Mostly so we can see a massive influx of scammers tears 
Except that the market escrow system is not a bank. It is an escrow system.
Aside from that, you can't overdraw on your wallet, nor can you write a bad checque, so there's no fee to charge even if it were.
You are penalized. Your order fails, meaning that you need to spend the broker's fee again in order to have a chance at purchasing the items you want to buy. If you had the ISK to cover, you'd have the items and wouldn't need to pay the broker's fee a second time.
If you want to hurt "margin" scammers, snake their escrow, or cause their orders to fail using items purchased at their actual value (so you can later sell those items at a profit or at no loss). (In quotes because the scam is complete once you've purchased the item, not when you try to sell it as you seem to think). This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Daisai
The Riot Formation Unclaimed.
114
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 07:07:00 -
[148] - Quote
It seems the level of posters is ones again pretty low on this forum. I dont see a reason to change this skill, i dont agree with its use but its fine with me.
I simply made a suggestion on how to come to a compromise between people against this skill and the people who use it. If you use the filter to ignore buy orders which have bee placed with margin trading the only person who losses money in such a case is the seller since he/she has less buy orders to sell to.
So the people who use this skill without the scamming are hardly effected by this.
Anyway like i said, i dont care if they change this skill im just giving a suggestion. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Balius and Xanthus Traditional Gunsmiths
9886
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 07:15:00 -
[149] - Quote
Daisai wrote:It seems the level of posters is ones again pretty low on this forum. I dont see a reason to change this skill, i dont agree with its use but its fine with me. I simply made a suggestion on how to come to a compromise between people against this skill and the people who use it. If you use the filter to ignore buy orders which have bee placed with margin trading the only person who losses money in such a case is the seller since he/she has less buy orders to sell to. So the people who use this skill without the scamming are hardly effected by this. Anyway like i said, i dont care if they change this skill im just giving a suggestion. Your suggestion was a filter, if the filter is on it penalises legitimate buyers as well as reducing potential customers for the seller, it's not that hard to wrap your head around, just as it's not not hard to avoid the margin trading scam if you're not being greedy.
The scam itself relies on the victims greed, if the victims weren't greedy, then there would be no scam.
On a side note, before you criticise the quality of other peoples posts, you should look at your own.
"Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad." |

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
6097
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 07:19:00 -
[150] - Quote
Daisai wrote:It seems the level of posters is ones again pretty low on this forum. I dont see a reason to change this skill, i dont agree with its use but its fine with me. I simply made a suggestion on how to come to a compromise between people against this skill and the people who use it. If you use the filter to ignore buy orders which have bee placed with margin trading the only person who losses money in such a case is the seller since he/she has less buy orders to sell to. So the people who use this skill without the scamming are hardly effected by this. Anyway like i said, i dont care if they change this skill im just giving a suggestion.
But seriously, why does there need to be a compromise? Why do some people feel that everyone needs to be protected in this game?
This is not real life, yet it seems as though many people on the forums are taking up a cause as if this were real life and everything needs to be fair all the time. I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE!-á Now... where's Ken? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |