| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country
7283
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 18:52:00 -
[31] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:
Just few minutes ago I had conversation with one of the "highsec bears" whos alt (more like main) pilot is in Wildly Inappropriate / Goonswarm. Couple days ago I met old TVP logi commander - he's in Nulli Secunda now. I believe at least half of pilots use incursions to sponsor their low/null PvP activities.
Its better money than out in 0.0 so its not much of a shocker. |

Vince Snetterton
303
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 20:17:00 -
[32] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Lipbite wrote:
Just few minutes ago I had conversation with one of the "highsec bears" whos alt (more like main) pilot is in Wildly Inappropriate / Goonswarm. Couple days ago I met old TVP logi commander - he's in Nulli Secunda now. I believe at least half of pilots use incursions to sponsor their low/null PvP activities.
Its better money than out in 0.0 so its not much of a shocker.
Another lie.
Incursions are not better than null ISK, per hour. Not by a long shot, even in the top end ISN HQ fleets.
But :
1. It is somewhat easier, because you climb into a fleet without getting a ton of your own corp/ alliance all committed at the same time. 2. While running incursions in high sec means you have to run the gauntlet of high sec gate camps constantly, that is easier than running all over null sec with high end ships. Unless your entire territory is covered with jump bridges, and you are guaranteed an incursion in a deep null sec enclave at all times, and so far, CCP has not given any null sec group that luxury.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8418
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 22:02:00 -
[33] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:Incursions are not better than null ISK, per hour. Not by a long shot, even in the top end ISN HQ fleets.
They are, by leaps and bounds. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Sam Ruger
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 22:22:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:Sam Ruger wrote:Could someone either explain to me the exact nature of the hostility between the 2 main fleets of Shield Tanked incursion groups. I know one got the word shiny in their name and I cant remember the others name. Does this same animosity exist in the armor tanked fleets? You ask that like anyone outside those two fleets give a flying fig...
You cared enough to be snotty. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3082
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 00:56:00 -
[35] - Quote
Joan Greywind wrote:There are a couple of main groups that run HQ with shield ships:
Disclaimer: I am a little biased towards 1 of these groups, but I will try to be as objective as possible (lies already :P)
ISN or Incursion Shiny network: They currently have the highest standards for ship fittings, and are generally the best at doing incrusions (winning most contests and fastest sites with minimal losses). Although they do have higher standards than other communities they aren't elitist, and will accept any pilot with the right fittings and skills and teach them how to do incursions.
Policy: Contest whenever they can (more iskies and fun) and never kill the last mom in highsec.
TVP: They have the largest numbers of pilots, due mainly to their low fitting standards. They are a good starting ground if you are just starting incursion and dont have the skills, iskies to fly a more expensive ship. They fly shiny ships but it mostly gets watered down by the other less than optimal ships they fly with. All in all a healthy community, albeit bloated leadership and sometimes loss in the sense of direction. They also suffer from false "propaganda' in their channels.
Policy: Depends on the FC currently running really, so can range from contesting a fleet they have a chance of beating, to outright killing the mom when they lose one.
DIN Flotten: A german multiboxer community, where a fleet of 40 ships is usually piloted with less than 20 people. They usually fly shiny, but most of the members multibox so they are now regarded as the worst Incursion community (efficiency wise) losing almost all of their contests. Some pilots having 10 pilots in a fleet of 40 ships at any one time. They fit the "angry german" stereotype, at least at the the leader ship level. Sadly they have the worst form of false "propaganda" relying on outright (albeit hilarious) lies to save face, and that is made that much easier with the language barrier (mostly German speaking community).
Policy: Multiboxers get in fleet before real pilot on the queue, and kill every mom in highsec if we get contested even once.
Extra Quotes by DIN Flotten: "ISN made them do the mom", "this is our incrusion", "It's ok that I lost my 5b mach, I have 78 others"
WTM: it's a relatively new incursion community that to my limited knowledge is an offshoot of either TVP or DIN, (or both). Efficiency wise they aren't that bad and run relatively shiny fleets.
Policies: Unknown to me
There are other notable incursion communities, armor (they mostly keep to themselves and don't run as much the shield fleet (less efficient especially in hqs). You also have some form of a Russian community that sporadically shows up, but they also keep mostly to themselves.
Now in Incursions you can contest sites, where a fleet is a winner and the other the loser, one gets the iskies and the other gets none. Now since ISN is the best, they win most to all of their contests. ISN are aggressive with their contesting as the "good sites" (best isk efficiency) gets done by all fleets as they spawn. Now the other communities hold the belief that sites shouldn't be contested, and call it "unfair" and "there is enough for everyone". Of course ISN likes contesting and sees no reason it shouldn't do it (more iskies, more fun). Now that might sound elitist, but ISN pays for it by being better organized and having better ships and skills. After all it asks its members for higher investments than the other communities, why should the members invest so much if they see no return? The other communities respond to that by killing the mom sites which kills the incursion, and noone can do sites anymore (no more iskies). Now this of course hurts all incursion communities and is really the "nuclear option". Of course it hurts the incursion communities invoking the nuclear option as they are usually the "poorer" communities and need the iskies the most. This of course is not sustainable and soon, will have accept the fact, that either they need to step up their game (better ships) or do the cheaper sites. Don't get me wrong ISN does get damaged from the moms popping, but they get hurt the least, as they have the richest base and are generally more tightly knitted and organized. It is now really a battle of wills, who can hold out longer.
So there it is, your drama, and I know it is a long post. Whoever said you cant have spais and drama in highsec, well here you go. And for people that are going to call this carebear acting tough, remember an average fleet of 40 pilots can make 4b an hour in incursions, that is (conservatively) 20b a day and 600b a month for each community. The big war in null sec is being fought for 200b/month worth of moons, by tens of thousands of players.
Thank you for taking the time to write that. Very informative. |

Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate Villore Accords
123
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 01:39:00 -
[36] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:People here have phrased the wiping out of incursion mom's as the "nuclear option" perpetrated by one shield group upset that they can't compete with iSN.
That is of course, a lie.
I have parked chars off the mom acc gate and seem oh so many ISN ships heading into to wipe out mom's. The standard practice that has evolved seems to be for a euro-TZ based group to farm it hard for a day, and when their prime time is done, they kill the mom wiping out any income generation for any other TZ heavy group.
Pics or it didn't happen. DIN alt detected. |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
367
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 03:02:00 -
[37] - Quote
Why are you even flying with shields? Armor groups (TDF) are far better.
But to answer you questions, ISN wanted to be the ******** child in the group and always popped the MOM to end incursions just to get their way. Then other shield fleets decided to be ******** and both groups went batshit and started to destroy the MOM like two socially inept, pathetically ******** kids. Meanwhile, armor groups pointed and laughed. Because in the end, the shield fleets are hurting themselves. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8421
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 03:24:00 -
[38] - Quote
killing a mothership to complete a finished incursion isn't griefing
keeping an incursion open and preventing other people from using that constellation, on the other hand... Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
367
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 03:27:00 -
[39] - Quote
Andski wrote:killing a mothership to complete a finished incursion isn't griefing
keeping an incursion open and preventing other people from using that constellation, on the other hand... Finished for whom? For ISN? Lately, many shield fleets have been killing unfinished incursions just to assert the length of their e-peen in a giant neckbeardery contest. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8421
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 03:33:00 -
[40] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:Andski wrote:killing a mothership to complete a finished incursion isn't griefing
keeping an incursion open and preventing other people from using that constellation, on the other hand... Finished for whom? For ISN? Lately, many shield fleets have been killing unfinished incursions just to assert the length of their e-peen in a giant neckbeardery contest.
you can't kill an unfinished incursion; an incursion is for all intents and purposes finished when the mothership spawns Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3083
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 03:38:00 -
[41] - Quote
Andski wrote:killing a mothership to complete a finished incursion isn't griefing
keeping an incursion open and preventing other people from using that constellation, on the other hand...
Good God I'm gonna have to burn my keyboard. I actually agree with a goon on something.
He's right. Keeping the mothership in space while grinding the incursion is outright wrong. How do I know? Because when we were popping them to make a point about the incursions (early 2012 this was) the hate coming from the "entitled" players who had an ISK fountain and refused to admit it was very strong.
OK so highsec incursions provide a lot of ISK, and people are going to argue back and forth about incursions versus tech moons and all that. I get it.
But not engaging the mothership solely for the purpose of grinding the combat sites - these people know exactly what they are doing and any "reason" or excuse otherwise is outright bullshitting.
Were it up to me, the mothership would have a short duration time, and if it went away without being destroyed, there would be ZERO LP rewards for the entire incursion, and only 100 percent LP payout for those who actually engaged the mothership. Those who do not engage it would only get a payout based on the percentage of total sites they were involved in.
Letting the leader of an incursion get away, ignoring it to collect ISK, is game-breaking and against the concept of the incursion: you are supposed to destroy the enemy.
You see, it's true that popping the mom is NOT greifing. Why? It's simply not. But, real greifing is not find some hapless noob and driving him out of the game "for the lulz". That's street-level noobs greifing noobs and pretending they are leet. It's crap. It's taking candy from a baby.
Real good griefing is when you have people who set themselves up with a sense of entitlement, game a mechanic to snatch every last little ISK or advantage out of it, then when YOU act within the boundaries of the game mechanic they get butthurt and will come up with the most vile things to say to you, showing their weakness and their lies. That is good griefing! The lengths they went through with to stop the anti-mom fleet the last time was epic (and failed).
Now I know there will be more butthurt but again, what are people doing with all this ISK? Are they stupidly lobbing Tengus into gate camps all day? I don't think so. High sec incursion ISK-snatcher elitists are as bad as nullsec carebears getting butthurt over an AFK cloaker putting a damper on their anom-running.
|

Felicity Love
Interstellar Booty Hunters
748
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 03:42:00 -
[42] - Quote
Sam Ruger wrote:Could someone either explain to me the exact nature of the hostility between the 2 main fleets of Shield Tanked incursion groups. I know one got the word shiny in their name and I cant remember the others name. Does this same animosity exist in the armor tanked fleets?
Well, it's like any other sandbox. Some kiddies place nice together. Others, not so much. Who knew ? 
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8421
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 03:43:00 -
[43] - Quote
I should start a roleplaying group that considers The Nation its greatest enemy and slays motherships wherever they appear without haste while prohibiting its pilots from flying Sansha abominations like Nightmares Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3083
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 03:51:00 -
[44] - Quote
Andski wrote:I should start a roleplaying group that considers The Nation its greatest enemy and slays motherships wherever they appear without haste while prohibiting its pilots from flying Sansha abominations like Nightmares
Of all the epic butthurt that could be done in highsec, popping those moms, you guys chose instead to gank freighters in Jita.
Makes me wonder if incursions are merely a sop to keep the high-skilled and high ISK players out of your backyard.
Would really suck if that ISK was used to finance incursions into goon space, no? |

Joan Greywind
Temnava Legion No Holes Barred
51
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 03:58:00 -
[45] - Quote
Just so it's clear, ISN will pop moms from time to time, but they will never pop it early and will never pop the last mom in highsec (effectively killed any income). We are first and last an incursion community and see no benefit in killing the mom. Killing the mom is actually the least efficient site to do. Nowadays ISN are in a mom site only when we know it is in withdrawal, or someone is already going to do it and we are just contesting them.
Well here you go, if you have any more questions go ahead and ask maybe I can make this clearer.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3845
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 04:03:00 -
[46] - Quote
Andski wrote:I should start a roleplaying group that considers The Nation its greatest enemy and slays motherships wherever they appear without haste while prohibiting its pilots from flying Sansha abominations like Nightmares Would the group also be a bunch of dirty blobbers? There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over. Fountain will never fall. Deklein by September. Thought is not heresy, wrong thought is.
PL, NC., N3, Tribe, 401k, you are our only hope ! ~TEST2013 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8423
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 04:34:00 -
[47] - Quote
Joan Greywind wrote:Just so it's clear, ISN will pop moms from time to time, but they will never pop it early and will never pop the last mom in highsec (effectively killed any income). We are first and last an incursion community and see no benefit in killing the mom. Killing the mom is actually the least efficient site to do. Nowadays ISN are in a mom site only when we know it is in withdrawal, or someone is already going to do it and we are just contesting them.
Well here you go, if you have any more questions go ahead and ask maybe I can make this clearer.
i'm curious why do you run incursions when you're in a wormhole alliance Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
569
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 04:51:00 -
[48] - Quote
Andski wrote:I should start a roleplaying group that considers The Nation its greatest enemy and slays motherships wherever they appear without haste while prohibiting its pilots from flying Sansha abominations like Nightmares
Not the disminish what you most likely can accomplish but weren't you guys doing this some time ago and then just stopped for whatever the raeson might be?
I might have that story all wrong. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8423
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 05:05:00 -
[49] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Andski wrote:I should start a roleplaying group that considers The Nation its greatest enemy and slays motherships wherever they appear without haste while prohibiting its pilots from flying Sansha abominations like Nightmares Not the disminish what you most likely can accomplish but weren't you guys doing this some time ago and then just stopped for whatever the raeson might be? I might have that story all wrong.
I don't know of any mothership killing campaign led by Goonswarm. I know that our incursion SIG headshot a mothership and got some scrubby incursion group (BTL I think?) angry and they talked about "funding our enemies" or whatever, so they did another headshot and laughed at them. Then they decided that banning our entire alliance *gasp* from running incursions with them would be a suitable punishment, even though Goonswarm members wouldn't be allowed to join incursion gangs anyway because we have ongoing wardecs all the time. vOv Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Lykouleon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
901
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 05:25:00 -
[50] - Quote
I thought incursion groups were dead and the incursion communities were completely demolished by the nerf in income? Or do the blogs/tumblrs/twitters lie to me once again? Toshiro Ozuwara > GOon cowards come fight Toshiro Ozuwara > Oh wait, you only camp when you got numberssss
I would fully support account bans by ccp for meta type stuff like this. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8423
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 06:28:00 -
[51] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Makes me wonder if incursions are merely a sop to keep the high-skilled and high ISK players out of your backyard.
Would really suck if that ISK was used to finance incursions into goon space, no?
ahahaha yes, clearly the loosely organized incursion runners who cry about dying to rats are a major threat to our space empire Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
454
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 06:33:00 -
[52] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Would really suck if that ISK was used to finance incursions into goon space, no?
You're seeing it too? That the game is being tailored around them. Much like EQII was tailored around a few avatar guilds? Much like WoW and it's heroic raiders at the expense of everyone else?
That anything that could be ingame money to fight is being nerfed or curtailed?
Then all of sudden a territorial war is about mats? Just like before with Technetium?
One trick ponies that really need to get off the teet. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
454
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 06:38:00 -
[53] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Now I know there will be more butthurt but again, what are people doing with all this ISK? Are they stupidly lobbing Tengus into gate camps all day? I don't think so. High sec incursion ISK-snatcher elitists are as bad as nullsec carebears getting butthurt over an AFK cloaker putting a damper on their anom-running.
And who are those "ISK-snatcher elitists"?
Notice how many high-sec Goon players are around? "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting Home Front Coalition
589
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 13:18:00 -
[54] - Quote
So... you got into the fanciest PVE boat ever, but your boss says you can't shoot the boss... ok then.  |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3086
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 13:34:00 -
[55] - Quote
Andski wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Andski wrote:I should start a roleplaying group that considers The Nation its greatest enemy and slays motherships wherever they appear without haste while prohibiting its pilots from flying Sansha abominations like Nightmares Not the disminish what you most likely can accomplish but weren't you guys doing this some time ago and then just stopped for whatever the raeson might be? I might have that story all wrong. I don't know of any mothership killing campaign led by Goonswarm. I know that our incursion SIG headshot a mothership and got some scrubby incursion group (BTL I think?) angry and they talked about "funding our enemies" or whatever, so they did another headshot and laughed at them. Then they decided that banning our entire alliance *gasp* from running incursions with them would be a suitable punishment, even though Goonswarm members wouldn't be allowed to join incursion gangs anyway because we have ongoing wardecs all the time. vOv
Some background for you. (not in the posted order though). Blast from the past. All you need to know, complete with mullet.
Krissada
I really liked this CSM because he can rant better than I can
Darius III and butthurt
ohh that's cold, man. Cold (had to add this)
We touched your mom
Bears Fight Back
Uh, no.
And finally, a confession...
I still want to know why you guys would sooner gank freighters than pop moms. (imagine a third party seeing this terminology and thinking "WTF are they talking about?")
tl;dr at one time even the incursion runners thought they were OP and that prolonging them was too OP for ISK earning, and CCP did the usual "non nerf" my changing the payout for sites so vanguards could not be hyper-blitzed by shineys. |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
1148
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 14:19:00 -
[56] - Quote
Joan Greywind wrote:Just so it's clear, ISN will pop moms from time to time, but they will never pop it early and will never pop the last mom in highsec (effectively killed any income
The bold underlined is incorrect because they have done both before, but not lately ( past few months ) which is a releif. Incursioners have our lil dramas, politics & feuds, but compare it to NULL's BIG dramas, politics & feuds- gek the fudge outta herez  An' then [email protected], he come scramblin outta theTerminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system'scrashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children' |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
1148
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 14:24:00 -
[57] - Quote
Andski wrote: I don't know of any mothership killing campaign led by Goonswarm.
It happened about a year & a half ago ( so yes to answer your ignorance of it it has been done ) and Goons are still banned from my Incursion channel over it ( we got long memories), but we have a few Goon alts that I know of still in the channel. An' then [email protected], he come scramblin outta theTerminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system'scrashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children' |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
1148
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 14:29:00 -
[58] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
tl;dr at one time even the incursion runners thought they were OP and that prolonging them was too OP for ISK earning, and CCP did the usual "non nerf" my changing the payout for sites so vanguards could not be hyper-blitzed by shineys.
But they didn't change how the HQ's could be hyper-blitzed by shields only Vanguards blitzed by Armour fleets. Since most NULL mains running Incursion are more armour skilled then shield skilled this stemmed the bleed off a bit from NULLquite a bit & FW buff happened which out Monty Hauled Incursions' ISK per hour by a magnitude at its peak An' then [email protected], he come scramblin outta theTerminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system'scrashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children' |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
457
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 14:42:00 -
[59] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:I still want to know why you guys would sooner gank freighters than pop moms. (imagine a third party seeing this terminology and thinking "WTF are they talking about?")
Simple. Resource control. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3089
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 15:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
tl;dr at one time even the incursion runners thought they were OP and that prolonging them was too OP for ISK earning, and CCP did the usual "non nerf" my changing the payout for sites so vanguards could not be hyper-blitzed by shineys.
But they didn't change how the HQ's could be hyper-blitzed by shields only Vanguards blitzed by Armour fleets. Since most NULL mains running Incursion are more armour skilled then shield skilled this stemmed the bleed off a bit from NULLquite a bit & FW buff happened which out Monty Hauled Incursions' ISK per hour by a magnitude at its peak
Ah. That's new information to me. I didn't keep up with things after the era of those links I posted. Thanks. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |