Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 11:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Title says it all.
Sick of Pandemic Leigon and other nullsec mega-rich alliances cynoing into lowsec, killing every tower on every moon vaguely worth anything, and having 0 effective risk at all. Even with 16 hardneres is takes less than 10 minutes for a PL fleet to kill a large tower from reinforced, meaning that even if someone else wants to jump in to pvp them, the cap fleet has arrived, killed the tower, and left before anyone can actually pvp them.
This is meant to be a game. There is no fun in "no way to kill them" fights.
So one or more of the changes below are needed - which are useful / not?
1. Only 6 capitals, maximum, in space in any lowsec system. 2. Lowsec POS get 500% bonus defence to attacks by capitals. 3. Carriers and Dreads in LOWSEC can be warp jammed by anything. 4. POS guns get upgraded radically so they can actually HURT capitals. 5. Only two ships able to jump to one cyno each minute. 6. Ships jumping into lowsec cannot jump out until their combat timers have ended.
The idea of the above is to actually have well, pvp. Currently the game is whoever has the most isk (i.e. credit card ability) just wins. That's rubbish. Need actual pvp over static objects, not capital blat fleets that have no effective risk.
PvP is meant to be risk vs reward, fun from succeeding and achieving objectives and surviving the risks. It's not happening - much of pvp in EVE is horribly boring, and rightly slammed by players who like more than spreadsheets for their gameplay.
|
Job Valador
Super Moose Defence Force
113
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 11:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tell me were on the POS doll PL touched you. "The stone exhibited a profound lack of movement." |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
139
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 11:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Title says it all.
Sick of Pandemic Leigon and other nullsec mega-rich alliances cynoing into lowsec, killing every tower on every moon vaguely worth anything, and having 0 effective risk at all. Even with 16 hardneres is takes less than 10 minutes for a PL fleet to kill a large tower from reinforced, meaning that even if someone else wants to jump in to pvp them, the cap fleet has arrived, killed the tower, and left before anyone can actually pvp them.
This is meant to be a game. There is no fun in "no way to kill them" fights.
So one or more of the changes below are needed - which are useful / not?
1. Only 6 capitals, maximum, in space in any lowsec system. 2. Lowsec POS get 500% bonus defence to attacks by capitals. 3. Carriers and Dreads in LOWSEC can be warp jammed by anything. 4. POS guns get upgraded radically so they can actually HURT capitals. 5. Only two ships able to jump to one cyno each minute. 6. Ships jumping into lowsec cannot jump out until their combat timers have ended.
The idea of the above is to actually have well, pvp. Currently the game is whoever has the most isk (i.e. credit card ability) just wins. That's rubbish. Need actual pvp over static objects, not capital blat fleets that have no effective risk.
PvP is meant to be risk vs reward, fun from succeeding and achieving objectives and surviving the risks. It's not happening - much of pvp in EVE is horribly boring, and rightly slammed by players who like more than spreadsheets for their gameplay.
meh? a simple warp disruptor / scrambler is enought to prevent a carrier or a dread to warp / jump.
if you failed at that, the ONLY way is that they were in triage / siege, meaning they couldn't warp / jump or even move anyway
also 500% resist VS capitals? yeah sure.....what about the smaller entitys then? it already take ages to kill a large tower with a couple dreads, so unless you can field 20 of them or 200+ fleet you would have no way to even scratch said tower.
so clearly NO |
Tauranon
Weeesearch
202
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 11:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:
2. Lowsec POS get 500% bonus defence to attacks by capitals.
lol at failing to understand capital role.
PL isn't going to kill your towers if they aren't sitting on something valuable and don't drop anything valuable. I had a plat moon for 6 months, and it only got killed whilst I was unsubbed due to the price rise in plat.
Like it or lump moons are assets to be fought over by major players.
|
Whitehound
1550
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 12:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Title says it all.
Sick of Pandemic Leigon and other nullsec mega-rich alliances cynoing into lowsec, killing every tower on every moon vaguely worth anything, and having 0 effective risk at all. Even with 16 hardneres is takes less than 10 minutes for a PL fleet to kill a large tower from reinforced, meaning that even if someone else wants to jump in to pvp them, the cap fleet has arrived, killed the tower, and left before anyone can actually pvp them.
This is meant to be a game. There is no fun in "no way to kill them" fights.
So one or more of the changes below are needed - which are useful / not?
1. Only 6 capitals, maximum, in space in any lowsec system. 2. Lowsec POS get 500% bonus defence to attacks by capitals. 3. Carriers and Dreads in LOWSEC can be warp jammed by anything. 4. POS guns get upgraded radically so they can actually HURT capitals. 5. Only two ships able to jump to one cyno each minute. 6. Ships jumping into lowsec cannot jump out until their combat timers have ended.
The idea of the above is to actually have well, pvp. Currently the game is whoever has the most isk (i.e. credit card ability) just wins. That's rubbish. Need actual pvp over static objects, not capital blat fleets that have no effective risk.
PvP is meant to be risk vs reward, fun from succeeding and achieving objectives and surviving the risks. It's not happening - much of pvp in EVE is horribly boring, and rightly slammed by players who like more than spreadsheets for their gameplay.
It is the wrong forum. Better post it in Features & Ideas Discussion.
To your suggestions:
1. There should never be a limit to the number of ships within a system other than the hardware limit. Any such suggestion as yours is nonsense and a step back to parties of 4 or 6 players". It is an MMO. 2. A 500% bonus contradicts the entire idea of dreads. 3. As interesting as it sounds will the suggestion shift the number ratio of caps only further away from small organizations towards the larger and largest ones. You do not want this to happen. 4. Anchor more guns?!
5. More interesting than any of the 4 previous suggestions, but instead of limiting the number of caps, which is only another suggestion that will hurt the nature of the game (being an MMO), should it have something like an anti-cyno module for disabling cynos within an area (i.e. 40km radius). Thereby forcing fleets to approach from a distance and stretching battlefields out.
6. Not sure. Was this not already part of CrimeWatch 2? Seems only far ... Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |
Danny John-Peter
Stay Frosty.
220
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 12:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
Carriers and Dreads can be tackled by anything, and both have a base warp strength of 0 to boot.
Only Supers and Titans need to be HIC pointed or bubbled.
|
|
CCP Logibro
C C P C C P Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 13:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
Moved to Features & Ideas Discussion CCP Logibro | EVE Universe Community Team | Distributor of Nanites
@CCP_Logibro |
|
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 13:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Job Valador wrote:Tell me were on the POS doll PL touched you.
*there* and *there*
You guys seem to miss the whole point. If you want a healthy pvp game, there has to be a way for smaller alliances to develop up to the point where they are viable in nullsec.
Currently, the only way you can be in nullsec is to be part of a mega zerg.
And when those mega zergs also take over all of lowsec (they are not hitting 'one or two' moons, they are blatting all kinds of things - guess they are just super-bored in nullsec where no-one plays any more) then the simple message is if you can't gly a capital ship, you can't pvp when it matters.
Quite simply capital ships should not be allowed to utterly dominate nullsec AND lowsec pvp.
This is a game. When there are 4 or 5 alliances that have "always win, never lose" fleets (the exception being when they fight each other or get awoxed), then everyone else stats to say "why am I paying for this game again? It's not fun."
Consider these points -
1. Who trains starbase defence management and does not immediately regret wasting their time?
2. Why does CCP advertise that new players can PvP when the reality is new players may as well be ants under the tracks of main battle tanks when it comes to new players vs capital fleets?
3. If you are the ant, and know you need to either buy a toon or play for a year before you can have a tank too, how many fellow ants do you think will continue to keep playing?
4. Thank you all for gleefully pointing out that you can warp disrupt a carrier or dread. So what, they just hit jump. You know what I meant, don't pretend otherwise while also pretending to be such founts of wisdom.
Oh before someone says "if you don't like it, go and play another game!" ... well that's the problem. My friends have been leaving to play other games, and I want to play EVE. But the way things are going, EVE pvp is getting horribly split between rich veterans who can have anything they want, and new players, who can never have the thing many players want most in any MMO game - a home of their own.
We didn't want null to mine moons, or just to rat sites, or any one thing. We wanted a *home*. Currently the mechanics of the game mean we can't have that, because even though there are hundreds of empty sytems out there, they are all controlled by the fabulously rich. So unless new players buy their way into that gamespace, then they are will will be for years, nothing more than second class players who pay to sustain a game that they cannot realistically play large elements of without losing their shared identities and joining one of the existing mega zergs. And even those don't work out so well, causing massive player attrition when wars are lost.
Think about it ... if the game was doing so well, why are so many high level toons for sale? ;p
|
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
2363
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 13:49:00 -
[9] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Title says it all.
Sick of Pandemic Leigon and other nullsec mega-rich alliances cynoing into lowsec, killing every tower on every moon vaguely worth anything, and having 0 effective risk at all. Even with 16 hardneres is takes less than 10 minutes for a PL fleet to kill a large tower from reinforced, meaning that even if someone else wants to jump in to pvp them, the cap fleet has arrived, killed the tower, and left before anyone can actually pvp them.
This is meant to be a game. There is no fun in "no way to kill them" fights.
So one or more of the changes below are needed - which are useful / not?
1. Only 6 capitals, maximum, in space in any lowsec system. 2. Lowsec POS get 500% bonus defence to attacks by capitals. 3. Carriers and Dreads in LOWSEC can be warp jammed by anything. 4. POS guns get upgraded radically so they can actually HURT capitals. 5. Only two ships able to jump to one cyno each minute. 6. Ships jumping into lowsec cannot jump out until their combat timers have ended.
The idea of the above is to actually have well, pvp. Currently the game is whoever has the most isk (i.e. credit card ability) just wins. That's rubbish. Need actual pvp over static objects, not capital blat fleets that have no effective risk.
PvP is meant to be risk vs reward, fun from succeeding and achieving objectives and surviving the risks. It's not happening - much of pvp in EVE is horribly boring, and rightly slammed by players who like more than spreadsheets for their gameplay.
You really shouldn't post when you're mad.
Addressing your points:
1.: PL (or someone) would just put 6 capitals in every system and then you couldn't field any. Ever. 2.: PL would just drop 100 battleships on your POS and you would still fail and whine about it. 3.: Um... they already can. L2Capital 4.: What do you want, a doomsday device on a POS? 5.: So you can handle 2 at a time eh? Probably optimistic. 6.: You really think that will stop them? You can't respond to them with capitals due to the 6 ship limit and/or 2 per cyno rule you just made up.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |
suid0
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
19
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 13:52:00 -
[10] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Even with 16 hardneres is takes less than 10 minutes for a PL fleet to kill a large tower from reinforced, meaning that even if someone else wants to jump in to pvp them, the cap fleet has arrived, killed the tower, and left before anyone can actually pvp them.
If the tower was in reinforced then you knew when the fleet was coming... if 10 minutes isn't enough time to warp a cyno to a tower you probably don't really have the time to manage that tower to begin with. Sounds like someone did you a favour.
Grace Ishukone wrote: This is meant to be a game. There is no fun in "no way to kill them" fights.
Because having 16 hardeners on a tower makes for fun game play when someone wants to attack your resources.
|
|
TehCloud
Carnivore Company
71
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 13:55:00 -
[11] - Quote
Oh boy OP, you so silly.
CCP already posted a solution to all your problems a long time ago, can't you even use the search function?
The solution is: here My Condor costs less than that module! |
NuNu Dagobah
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote: Consider these points -
1. Who trains starbase defence management and does not immediately regret wasting their time?
2. Why does CCP advertise that new players can PvP when the reality is new players may as well be ants under the tracks of main battle tanks when it comes to new players vs capital fleets?
3. If you are the ant, and know you need to either buy a toon or play for a year before you can have a tank too, how many fellow ants do you think will continue to keep playing?
4. Thank you all for gleefully pointing out that you can warp disrupt a carrier or dread. So what, they just hit jump. You know what I meant, don't pretend otherwise while also pretending to be such founts of wisdom.
1. Starbase defence management is a useful skill, if you know how to use it.
2. New players CAN pvp, but don't expect to be able to make a stand against a 2000 man, established corporation with a massive wallet. That ain't happening in any single game, get over it.
3. Plenty, we all had to start somewhere, we were all ants at one point in time.
4. Wow, just, wow. If you don't even know how wrong you are with that, then you have no ******* business even going to lowsec. I'll explain it for you. If you're tackled in a capital (as in, scrammed or pointed), you CAN'T jump.
Also, all of the other people here are making quite a few good points as to what kind of a dumbass you are. With this, I think it's rather obvious Lousy idea, -1, not supported |
David Magnus
229
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
I know your pain, OP. For over two years I had a high-sec research tower on a moon about six jumps from Jita in an alt-corp.
I went away for just a single weekend, came back, and the tower was completely gone. I had been wardecced, tower destroyed, and then they retracted the war-dec in the span of three days. Needless to say, I was pretty upset as well.
Do you have any suggestions for mechanics to stop that from happening? http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/fight-us-maybe
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/winterupdate
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/supercaps
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/pandemiclegion |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:07:00 -
[14] - Quote
TehCloud wrote:Oh boy OP, you so silly. CCP already posted a solution to all your problems a long time ago, can't you even use the search function? The solution is: here
No, CCP is working on a better solution. It's called World of Darkness, where there is perma death. But also the promise of much more meaningful gameplay, much richer social complexity, and wonderful clothing if their Carbon engine lives up to the old demos.
In all honesty, the "harden up or quit" idea is not working - 10 years on, EVE is alive but hardly booming, despite massive and sustained marketing efforts. EVE itself is being progressively dumbed down - just look at Odyssey. You don't need to scan down miners in belts any more, gee that makes the game require more skill! And taking the combat ships out of data sites ... YAY that made it ... oh wait. Themepark 101 designers seem to have taken over EVE. So I may as well advocate for themepark changes that support my playstyle.
And when WoD launches? Set long skill training, unsub EVE. If the new game lives up to its potential, and with CCP designing it I honestly believe it will, then EVE will quietly slip back into being nothing more than a curiosity game for accountants in space, with the design and advertising effort going into the new game that could actually make CCP a great deal of money. Yes, money ... not isk.
|
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
NuNu Dagobah wrote: 4. Wow, just, wow. If you don't even know how wrong you are with that, then you have no ******* business even going to lowsec. I'll explain it for you. If you're tackled in a capital (as in, scrammed or pointed), you CAN'T jump.
Then why do people in-game who have played far longer than I keep telling me they can still jump and that you need a HIC to stop them? (including Pandemic Leigon players). You actually tested that what you say is actually accurate post-Odyssey? |
Arden Elenduil
The League of Extraordinary Mentlegen
32
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:11:00 -
[16] - Quote
Just fyi, skilltraining stops after 3 days if your account is unsubbed. That said, why wait, you should leave now (also, contract me all your stuff before you go) |
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
438
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:12:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:Moved to Features & Ideas Discussion
You should have locked it for the crap post that it is...500% resists? 100% would be sufficient since it would mean no damage gets through at all.
Christ, some people simply fail at math. OP you are dumb. Really, really dumb.
We should all post facepalm pics in this thread from now on. |
NuNu Dagobah
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:13:00 -
[18] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:NuNu Dagobah wrote: 4. Wow, just, wow. If you don't even know how wrong you are with that, then you have no ******* business even going to lowsec. I'll explain it for you. If you're tackled in a capital (as in, scrammed or pointed), you CAN'T jump.
Then why do people in-game who have played far longer than I keep telling me they can still jump and that you need a HIC to stop them? (including Pandemic Leigon players). You actually tested that what you say is actually accurate post-Odyssey?
"Points at alliance"
You think I even have to test it? |
Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
564
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:16:00 -
[19] - Quote
Kings of Lowsec |
Mad Moxie
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:18:00 -
[20] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Kings of Lowsec
agreed lol |
|
Sarkelias Anophius
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
8
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:27:00 -
[21] - Quote
Funny, I could have sworn there was a massive war in nullsec in which one side was winning strategically without deploying supers
Also didn't a funny thing happen to some PL supers in lowsex? It's not like this stuff can't be dealt with |
Blastil
The Reblier Alliance
80
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:28:00 -
[22] - Quote
War Kitten wrote: 4.: What do you want, a doomsday device on a POS?
Holy ****! BEST IDEA EVER! |
Siri Exotic
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:30:00 -
[23] - Quote
Blastil wrote:War Kitten wrote: 4.: What do you want, a doomsday device on a POS?
Holy ****! BEST IDEA EVER!
or the option to remotely self destruct the pos tower with Doomsday Splash Damage for 200km |
DarklordKarn
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
7
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:32:00 -
[24] - Quote
Justin Timberlake wrote a song about his...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DksSPZTZES0
|
DarklordKarn
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
7
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:34:00 -
[25] - Quote
forgot to add....
...nom nom nom.... |
Alekanderu
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:36:00 -
[26] - Quote
pwned |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:40:00 -
[27] - Quote
NuNu Dagobah wrote:Grace Ishukone wrote:NuNu Dagobah wrote: 4. Wow, just, wow. If you don't even know how wrong you are with that, then you have no ******* business even going to lowsec. I'll explain it for you. If you're tackled in a capital (as in, scrammed or pointed), you CAN'T jump.
Then why do people in-game who have played far longer than I keep telling me they can still jump and that you need a HIC to stop them? (including Pandemic Leigon players). You actually tested that what you say is actually accurate post-Odyssey? "Points at alliance" You think I even have to test it?
You guys lied and betrayed us before, indeed I'm only in lowsec because I couldn't be in null sec after Pandemic Legion betrayed us and refused to change their decision. Nice work there, making a dead area thrive then killing it again because you thought we might have been sitting on an r64. We weren't, as you will know by now.
But yes, I have no business being in lowsec. I should be in nullsec, merrily mining and working out the most efficient way to build things. But instead I am typing on forums, wondering whether I should cancel all of my accounts, not just some of them.
And for the record yes, Pandemic Leigon cannot be trusted, even if you paid them. They will betray you without a second thought, and the whole "we don't own sov" thing is rubbish - they control access points to entire reigons, that they don't pay sov bills just means they are confident their cap fleets can defend their stations without needing iHubs to shield them, not that they do not *in reality* control huge parts of nullsec. Only their de-facto renter alliance members are permitted to play there, so when you go through dead systems and wish there was pvp there, don't blame me, blame alliances like PL.
Oh and to the Pandemic Leigon guys - you rather just proved the point of why CCP needs to redo the nullsec map and indeed the entire mecahnics of nullsec. When your own players are moving to lowsec and professing intent to play there (and on an individual level I have no reason to believe the player was lying) - it rather reinforces the point that the powerful nullsec alliances have succeeded in making nullsec so boring that their own players no longer wish to live there.
If nullsec was thriving and vibrant, and the location of the end-game of pvp and fun, then everyone wouldn't be moving to lowsec / highsec. Think about it.
Oh, and yes, I do expect that inside 2 years CCP will permit carriers to be used in highsec. They just made them a lot easier to get into the hull, just wait and watch the game go more and more and MORE over to highsec no-pvp themepark. And if you don't liek it, tough - the rich powerful alliances have shaped this game, as is appropriate in a sandbox. BUt the game still does not get to 100,000 concurrent users, not even close, despite 10 years of effort. Commercially, it's kind of a dog, really. I still love EVE, but it has huge issues that flow from bad design calls - one of the most glaring of which is that poor quality systems are conceptually there to be peoples "homes"; yet in reality they are nothing more than time wasters as everyone warps to the out gate to jump 8 - 15 systems to MAYBE get one pvp encounter in nullsec. Pathetic waste of time for players and wasted design opportunity.
So Pandemic Leigon - if CCP do things like hard cap how many stations any alliance can own, how many capitals can be in a system, or simply ban capitals from lowsec entirely ... get over it. There really are likely to be significant design changes made, because let's be honest, currently nearly every one of the large alliances sets up their gameplay to *avoid* pvp. Taking a dozen capitals into a lowsec system 15 minutes before downtime so that there is no time for anyone else to drop your fleet, and the locals have absolutely no chance to threaten even one of your ships let alone all of them, isn't encouraging pvp. It's accountants in space, at its infamous best.
If you were real pvpers, and genuniely wanted pvp, you would scout out what the locals use, and then turn up in a fleet where victory was not certain. Then the locals would fight, and fun would ensue. But when you plan for massive overwheleming victory against people whom you know are the proverbial ants beneath your tank tracks, you simply encourage people to do what so many above encourage - to quit and play something else. And people do, including entire nullsec alliances of old.
An influx of new players whom you then betray and ruthlessly crush without any real effort at all brings you no glory. But it may indeed lead to CCP losing yet more customers. That means less people for you to kill - that is wonderful if you are a moon miner who loves playing spreadsheets in space, but terribly bad if you really are a pvper. The best wolves encourage sheep to live in large numbers in pastures they can hunt in. If you eat all the sheep or scare them all away, you have no-one but yourselves to blame when one wolf turns on the other, then the last lonely wolves lament the good old days when there was plenty of sheep to eat and plenty of wolves to test their strength against.
|
seth Hendar
I love you miners
139
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:43:00 -
[28] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:NuNu Dagobah wrote: 4. Wow, just, wow. If you don't even know how wrong you are with that, then you have no ******* business even going to lowsec. I'll explain it for you. If you're tackled in a capital (as in, scrammed or pointed), you CAN'T jump.
Then why do people in-game who have played far longer than I keep telling me they can still jump and that you need a HIC to stop them? (including Pandemic Leigon players). You actually tested that what you say is actually accurate post-Odyssey? Oh ... and "no business being in lowsec" ... you are MEANT to ENCOURAGE people like me to go into lowsec. Why? It's a PvP game FFS (again quoting PL) - you cannot complain about most of the players in the game in highsec not going to low / null, and nealy every single player in Nullsec posing up / docking rather than pvping. then say people like me shouldn't be going where we might actually get pvp'd. Especially when I *want* to pvp, but have simply no credible way to win without myself and all my friends each spending at least US$500 or waiting a year first. This is a game, not a job. Alkthough in reality it is more than that - because if all the people like me quit, then CCP's staff may well be out of a job. All the super-rich players in nullsec pay with PLEX. after all - the moon goos pay for that as well as spare caps. They can't pay staff with ISK, so don't be too quick to make newer players want to simply give up and go play Darkfall Unholy Wars or one of the other FFA PvP full loot MMOs out there now. EVE is not alone, and likely soon not even CCP's premiere product (indeed Dust income may potentially have overtaken EVE income for them). you seems to be the one who never flown a capital.
fyi, lost a thannatos to a drop of 90+ ppl 3 weeks ago, no hics involved.
only 2 type of ships are invuln to regular point / scram: titans and supers, for all the others, regular rules apply -> l2cap |
David Magnus
229
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:44:00 -
[29] - Quote
How were you betrayed and by whom? Did you give payment?
Please let me know what happened and I will investigate. You can EVEMail me if you prefer. http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/fight-us-maybe
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/winterupdate
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/supercaps
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/pandemiclegion |
Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
565
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:44:00 -
[30] - Quote
look at all dem fuggin words
u ok m8? |
|
Grarr Dexx
Snuff Box Urine Alliance
206
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:45:00 -
[31] - Quote
reading features & ideas gives me a ******* seizure, and so does your post |
Jyn Uin
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:45:00 -
[32] - Quote
For a low payment of 500 million isk I will investigate and punish whoever betrayed you in our alliance of honorable men. |
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
439
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:49:00 -
[33] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Job Valador wrote:Tell me were on the POS doll PL touched you. *there* and *there* You guys seem to miss the whole point. If you want a healthy pvp game, there has to be a way for smaller alliances to develop up to the point where they are viable in nullsec.
I'd say you don't know what this means, and you don't understand this game.
1. It is a sandbox--i.e. the devs are amazingly hands off regarding typical game play. If 20,000 players want to band together to do stuff...that's fine.
2. Setting up a POS with resists so that no damage gets through from capitals (ships that are in part designed to kill POS) is anti-thetical to PvP.
3. Part of PvP in this game is about working with others, even as a corp/alliance trying to lone wolf it can be tough...if you really want to do that, then as others have suggested HTFU you made a choice now live with it. Or change, and call in people who might want to drop on PL as they hit your tower. PL does have enemies you know. |
Mad Moxie
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:51:00 -
[34] - Quote
I love this thread. I haven't laughed this much in days |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
139
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:52:00 -
[35] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:NuNu Dagobah wrote:Grace Ishukone wrote:NuNu Dagobah wrote: 4. Wow, just, wow. If you don't even know how wrong you are with that, then you have no ******* business even going to lowsec. I'll explain it for you. If you're tackled in a capital (as in, scrammed or pointed), you CAN'T jump.
Then why do people in-game who have played far longer than I keep telling me they can still jump and that you need a HIC to stop them? (including Pandemic Leigon players). You actually tested that what you say is actually accurate post-Odyssey? "Points at alliance" You think I even have to test it? You guys lied and betrayed us before, indeed I'm only in lowsec because I couldn't be in null sec after Pandemic Legion betrayed us and refused to change their decision. Nice work there, making a dead area thrive then killing it again because you thought we might have been sitting on an r64. We weren't, as you will know by now. But yes, I have no business being in lowsec. I should be in nullsec, merrily mining and working out the most efficient way to build things. But instead I am typing on forums, wondering whether I should cancel all of my accounts, not just some of them. And for the record yes, Pandemic Leigon cannot be trusted, even if you paid them. They will betray you without a second thought, and the whole "we don't own sov" thing is rubbish - they control access points to entire reigons, that they don't pay sov bills just means they are confident their cap fleets can defend their stations without needing iHubs to shield them, not that they do not *in reality* control huge parts of nullsec. Only their de-facto renter alliance members are permitted to play there, so when you go through dead systems and wish there was pvp there, don't blame me, blame alliances like PL. Oh and to the Pandemic Leigon guys - you rather just proved the point of why CCP needs to redo the nullsec map and indeed the entire mecahnics of nullsec. When your own players are moving to lowsec and professing intent to play there (and on an individual level I have no reason to believe the player was lying) - it rather reinforces the point that the powerful nullsec alliances have succeeded in making nullsec so boring that their own players no longer wish to live there. If nullsec was thriving and vibrant, and the location of the end-game of pvp and fun, then everyone wouldn't be moving to lowsec / highsec. Think about it. Oh, and yes, I do expect that inside 2 years CCP will permit carriers to be used in highsec. They just made them a lot easier to get into the hull, just wait and watch the game go more and more and MORE over to highsec no-pvp themepark. And if you don't liek it, tough - the rich powerful alliances have shaped this game, as is appropriate in a sandbox. BUt the game still does not get to 100,000 concurrent users, not even close, despite 10 years of effort. Commercially, it's kind of a dog, really. I still love EVE, but it has huge issues that flow from bad design calls - one of the most glaring of which is that poor quality systems are conceptually there to be peoples "homes"; yet in reality they are nothing more than time wasters as everyone warps to the out gate to jump 8 - 15 systems to MAYBE get one pvp encounter in nullsec. Pathetic waste of time for players and wasted design opportunity. So Pandemic Leigon - if CCP do things like hard cap how many stations any alliance can own, how many capitals can be in a system, or simply ban capitals from lowsec entirely ... get over it. There really are likely to be significant design changes made, because let's be honest, currently nearly every one of the large alliances sets up their gameplay to *avoid* pvp. Taking a dozen capitals into a lowsec system 15 minutes before downtime so that there is no time for anyone else to drop your fleet, and the locals have absolutely no chance to threaten even one of your ships let alone all of them, isn't encouraging pvp. It's accountants in space, at its infamous best. If you were real pvpers, and genuniely wanted pvp, you would scout out what the locals use, and then turn up in a fleet where victory was not certain. Then the locals would fight, and fun would ensue. But when you plan for massive overwheleming victory against people whom you know are the proverbial ants beneath your tank tracks, you simply encourage people to do what so many above encourage - to quit and play something else. And people do, including entire nullsec alliances of old. An influx of new players whom you then betray and ruthlessly crush without any real effort at all brings you no glory. But it may indeed lead to CCP losing yet more customers. That means less people for you to kill - that is wonderful if you are a moon miner who loves playing spreadsheets in space, but terribly bad if you really are a pvper. The best wolves encourage sheep to live in large numbers in pastures they can hunt in. If you eat all the sheep or scare them all away, you have no-one but yourselves to blame when one wolf turns on the other, then the last lonely wolves lament the good old days when there was plenty of sheep to eat and plenty of wolves to test their strength against. this doesn't make sense, when you go fora fight, you go for winning the fight, hence you take whatever will bring you the best chance of victory..
this is universal in eve, and we can't be mad at anyone for doing it.
there is a balance issue with supers and titans being used by nulssec in low, this is true, but this is an issue from the way they are designed, just as simple as this.
hint: let CSAA being anchored in 0.4 and below.
lowsec can now have the same ships, and a wannabe nullsec alliance can access the ship required to do so (wich, in the current situation, is not possible without having a sov).
|
Katie Corb
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
28
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:53:00 -
[36] - Quote
I tried mining in nullsec and PL dropped 14 supers on me. :( :darkelf: |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
139
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:54:00 -
[37] - Quote
Katie Corb wrote:I tried mining in nullsec and PL dropped 14 supers on me. :( what were you mining with? |
Victyrael
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
34
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:56:00 -
[38] - Quote
Best thread on EVE-O. |
Richter Enderas
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
316
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 14:58:00 -
[39] - Quote
m-muh capital bl0b |
Theng Hofses
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:00:00 -
[40] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:
You guys lied and betrayed us before, indeed I'm only in lowsec because I couldn't be in null sec after Pandemic Legion betrayed us and refused to change their decision. Nice work there, making a dead area thrive then killing it again because you thought we might have been sitting on an r64. We weren't, as you will know by now. But yes, I have no business being in lowsec. I should be in nullsec, merrily mining and working out the most efficient way to build things. But instead I am typing on forums, wondering whether I should cancel all of my accounts, not just some of them
Who did what to you and who are you really? I am getting a bit confused here. . Eve is a game of risk and you risk it all. Be in nullsec but please understand that you have 0.0 security = zero security there. It is the might is right part of the game. If you don't like it, don't be in 0.0 security space.
Grace Ishukone wrote:
And for the record yes, Pandemic Leigon cannot be trusted, even if you paid them. They will betray you without a second thought
Okay, I get it.
Grace Ishukone wrote:
and the whole "we don't own sov" thing is rubbish - they control access points to entire reigons, that they don't pay sov bills just means they are confident their cap fleets can defend their stations without needing iHubs to shield them, not that they do not *in reality* control huge parts of nullsec. Only their de-facto renter alliance members are permitted to play there, so when you go through dead systems and wish there was pvp there, don't blame me, blame alliances like PL.
Oh and to the Pandemic Leigon guys - you rather just proved the point of why CCP needs to redo the nullsec map and indeed the entire mecahnics of nullsec. When your own players are moving to lowsec and professing intent to play there (and on an individual level I have no reason to believe the player was lying) - it rather reinforces the point that the powerful nullsec alliances have succeeded in making nullsec so boring that their own players no longer wish to live there.
If nullsec was thriving and vibrant, and the location of the end-game of pvp and fun, then everyone wouldn't be moving to lowsec / highsec. Think about it.
It's a sandbox game, we follow the rules to the full extend what is permitted. Apparently though we play the game slightly different to how you play the game. Don't blame us. Maybe you need a deeper understanding of how the game really works - and yes, it's a game after all.
Grace Ishukone wrote:
If you were real pvpers, and genuniely wanted pvp, you would scout out what the locals use, and then turn up in a fleet where victory was not certain. Then the locals would fight, and fun would ensue. But when you plan for massive overwheleming victory against people whom you know are the proverbial ants beneath your tank tracks, you simply encourage people to do what so many above encourage - to quit and play something else. And people do, including entire nullsec alliances of old.
Okay, some fight to win and try to minimize the chances of losing. If you do it any other way you just lose.
Grace Ishukone wrote:
An influx of new players whom you then betray and ruthlessly crush without any real effort at all brings you no glory. But it may indeed lead to CCP losing yet more customers. That means less people for you to kill - that is wonderful if you are a moon miner who loves playing spreadsheets in space, but terribly bad if you really are a pvper. The best wolves encourage sheep to live in large numbers in pastures they can hunt in. If you eat all the sheep or scare them all away, you have no-one but yourselves to blame when one wolf turns on the other, then the last lonely wolves lament the good old days when there was plenty of sheep to eat and plenty of wolves to test their strength against.
Sorry we pissed in your risk-free morning corn flakes and took your marbles away. Actually, not really that sorry. But I appreciate the advice from a self-admitted sheep like you, even though we are not wolves at all... just a different kind of sheep. We are actually quite bad at this game as our frequent ****-ups and losses show. Quite embarrassing though. My corp lost four super-carriers in one **** up last week and I don't even want to start about what the other corps lost. They were literally the sheep that were led to the slaughter. Any way, in your opinion, how we could avoid that going forward? How could mechanics be changed so that we can keep our precious resources that we spent so long to gather in the game? Thank you for your continued support and advice. |
|
Clith
Tr0pa de elite. Pandemic Legion
111
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:05:00 -
[41] - Quote
I am sorry to hear of your bad experience with the Pandemic Legion Lunar Reclamation Service. Our records show that you have not paid your lunar rental charge for the previous 4 months as agreed to when you signed the original contract. If you would like to resolve this situation, and continue the lease of this moon, please forward me the original copy of your lunar rental agreement, together with a sum of 2 billion isk covering the 4 months missed payments and late fees of 400 million isk. Once all documents have been received and payment made, I will arrange for a transfer of the lunar assets to your corporation. |
WarFireV
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
106
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:06:00 -
[42] - Quote
I like turtles. |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:08:00 -
[43] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:look at all dem fuggin words
u ok m8?
No, Pandemic Leigon betrayed us and took our nullsec home away, but didn't even want to live there.
Now my friends play WoW, battlefield 3, and World of Tanks rather than EvE. I miss playing the game with my friends. So I'm not ok, it really is your fault you lying arrogant bastards.
Is there anything I can do about it? Not at all. You're right, I can't fly a carrier, never have. I can build them, but I can't build the big ones in lowsec / highsec. So as a socially focused crafter / miner player, I think the current game design is absolutely atrocious. What is worse is that I am not alone in that, and the attrition rate of players out of EVE is appallingly high. That is why EVE Online continues to badly under perform as a commercial product, always being close to greatness, but never quite making it.
CCP have breached some of thier own original design tennents in an attempt to save EVE Online from closing. I expect they will go further and further in that direction. But make no mistake - how you treat your victims and enemies matters. You may have delicious tears, enjoy them if you will. But know that the simple truth is in player vs designer, ultimately the designer will win. And the reality is that Nullsec and the joke of what passes for skilled pvp there now has to change - there is no skill involved in lighting a cyno, clicking jump, clicking warp to, clicking attack. Many commentators rightly ridicule EVE's "pvp" ... and yet players seem to think that they are somehow wonderful because they did something that had no realistic risk and managed to click the correct button to warp home.
Until things like system wide cyno jammer ships are implemented, EVE capital ship pvp will be generally ultra-boring sov bashing. That the mechanics effectively mean alliances can deny entire reigons of the game to other players utility, even through they themselves do not utilise the space, simply means much of the game space is dead and empty - which for a pvp game translates to pointless waste of time for players seeking to engage in pvp.
I want to see the nullsec map radically changed. Enough with the dead systems owned or controlled by players who themselves are so bored they have moved to lowsec as well. You can criticize me all you like for wanting to stop those nullsec alliances projecting unanswerable combat power into lowsec in an attempt to force them to play in the nullsec they own/control, but make no mistake, if you don't come up with better ideas you get whatever CCP Themepark devs come up with next. And they WILL make changes - they have to, or this game dies when World of Darkness and one or two other key MMO pvp titles release. Do you want EVE to fall into maintenance mode? I don't. I want its player population to increase by at least 5 million players in the next 10 years, with 250k+ concurrent users. Yes Jita will need a new hamster to handle it, but so what? Point is as things stand, it's tracking to being remade as a themepark - many of the same dynamics that appeared in SWG prior to the CU are now detectable here, and if CCP does a SG style CU (oh wait 'ship rebalancing' anyone? - what is after that?) then we all know how bad things can get as developers try too hard to grow a game without fixing the deep issues first.
So yes, I'm upset. But it's not about a *thing* - it is because the idea that you and your friends can have a home in EVE is basically invalid in the current community in EVE. It does not matter that no-one *else* wants to play in such crappy distant -0.2 nullsec, it's that the map, high sec-dependant game mechanics, and mega powerful won't permit it to happen. When you talk to them and realize that the powerful would actually quite like it if you lived there so they could get fun pvp whenever they wanted it, then you realize the real issue is bad game design. Fix the map, or the higsec-dependant mechanics, but until CCP do, expect me to be upset. Because without changing those deep underlying problems, I really do fear CCP is going to make a horrible blunder like SW:G did with the CU, then try to fix it with more changes as SW:G did with the NGE ... and we know how that ended.
|
Mad Moxie
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:08:00 -
[44] - Quote
WarFireV wrote:I like turtles.
nobody cares |
Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
566
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:09:00 -
[45] - Quote
its just eve. man |
Jyn Uin
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:12:00 -
[46] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:look at all dem fuggin words
u ok m8? No, Pandemic Leigon betrayed us and took our nullsec home away, but didn't even want to live there. Now my friends play WoW, battlefield 3, and World of Tanks rather than EvE. I miss playing the game with my friends. So I'm not ok, it really is your fault you lying arrogant bastards.
http://www.suicidehotlines.com/ |
Mad Moxie
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:14:00 -
[47] - Quote
stop raging and get your mates back online . sign up to a renter corp and sell your caps to PL . we can give you far rates for them |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:15:00 -
[48] - Quote
Clith wrote:I am sorry to hear of your bad experience with the Pandemic Legion Lunar Reclamation Service. Our records show that you have not paid your lunar rental charge for the previous 4 months as agreed to when you signed the original contract. If you would like to resolve this situation, and continue the lease of this moon, please forward me the original copy of your lunar rental agreement, together with a sum of 2 billion isk covering the 4 months missed payments and late fees of 400 million isk. Once all documents have been received and payment made, I will arrange for a transfer of the lunar assets to your corporation.
We were only there 2 weeks, and I don't have 2 billion.
So cute, but no.
Give me a nullsec system inside 2 JCal 5 freigther jumps from high, with ice, a refinery, and manufacture lines, and I'll give you someplace where you can get 24/7 pvp where people actually fight back.
Although only two problems with that ... first is I can never trust Pandemic Legion, the second is you seem to be losing all the fights that really matter. So maybe I'll wait and see if you still exist next month first. That's the problem with betraying people, suddenly all bets are off and just as you say get over it, awoxing becomes perfectly legitimate. You can't betray others then expect no-one will betray you too. Not that I could do anything like that personally ... not like I can retrever your fleet to death or anything. ;p |
Tertiacero
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
11
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:19:00 -
[49] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:look at all dem fuggin words
u ok m8? Until things like system wide cyno jammer ships are implemented, EVE capital ship pvp will be generally ultra-boring sov bashing.
This is a good idea, maybe they should make a POS mod out of it. |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:21:00 -
[50] - Quote
Mad Moxie wrote:stop raging and get your mates back online . sign up to a renter corp and sell your caps to PL . we can give you far rates for them
We were about to assemble our first carrier when you guys betrayed us, so we cancelled production and sold the minerals instead. And now many of my friends have walked away from EVE because we can't play in null, we would likely struggle to be able to mine a and build a carrier a month.
But that is fine ... as your own Pandemic Leigon player seemed to be firmly of the opinion that mining is for AFK alts (and dare I say bots?), not actual people for whom mining is a social activity with lots of talking and working together. I am sure you will be very happy buying capitals off people who have 50 copies of themselves and great programmes to run them all at maximum efficiency, including docking the instant a neutral player enters a system one either side of their drone system. |
|
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:23:00 -
[51] - Quote
Tertiacero wrote:Grace Ishukone wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:look at all dem fuggin words
u ok m8? Until things like system wide cyno jammer ships are implemented, EVE capital ship pvp will be generally ultra-boring sov bashing. This is a good idea, maybe they should make a POS mod out of it.
That works in lowsec? Yeah right.
Engage brain before trolling, your nullsec mods requiring SOV have no application here. Although wouldn't that throw the cat amongst the pidegons if you COULD use cyno jammers on lowsec pos without sov? |
Hurley
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:23:00 -
[52] - Quote
One time I found some lint in my pocket |
Janos Vaas
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:23:00 -
[53] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Mad Moxie wrote:stop raging and get your mates back online . sign up to a renter corp and sell your caps to PL . we can give you far rates for them We were about to assemble our first carrier when you guys betrayed us, so we cancelled production and sold the minerals instead. And now many of my friends have walked away from EVE because we can't play in null, we would likely struggle to be able to mine a and build a carrier a month. But that is fine ... as your own Pandemic Leigon player seemed to be firmly of the opinion that mining is for AFK alts (and dare I say bots?), not actual people for whom mining is a social activity with lots of talking and working together. I am sure you will be very happy buying capitals off people who have 50 copies of themselves and great programmes to run them all at maximum efficiency, including docking the instant a neutral player enters a system one either side of their drone system.
http://imgur.com/account/favorites/qWfBU |
Mad Moxie
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:26:00 -
[54] - Quote
That works in lowsec? Yeah right.
Engage brain before trolling, your nullsec mods requiring SOV have no application here. Although wouldn't that throw the cat amongst the pidegons if you COULD use cyno jammers on lowsec pos without sov?
Especially if such mods stopped you jumping OUT for 1 hour after activation ...[/quote]
but if you cyno jam lowsec how will you get your JF there ?????? |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:26:00 -
[55] - Quote
Janos Vaas wrote:http://imgur.com/account/favorites/qWfBU
A link to something you need to sign in to see isn't very useful for the discussion.
And it better not be anything that you shouldn't be linking to ... these are public forums and there is an EULA / use agreement. |
DarklordKarn
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:26:00 -
[56] - Quote
Hello kitty island adventure ------ > |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:27:00 -
[57] - Quote
Mad Moxie wrote: That works in lowsec? Yeah right.
Engage brain before trolling, your nullsec mods requiring SOV have no application here. Although wouldn't that throw the cat amongst the pidegons if you COULD use cyno jammers on lowsec pos without sov?
Especially if such mods stopped you jumping OUT for 1 hour after activation ...
but if you cyno jam lowsec how will you get your JF there ??????[/quote]
By turning it off first |
Mad Moxie
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:29:00 -
[58] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Mad Moxie wrote: That works in lowsec? Yeah right.
Engage brain before trolling, your nullsec mods requiring SOV have no application here. Although wouldn't that throw the cat amongst the pidegons if you COULD use cyno jammers on lowsec pos without sov?
Especially if such mods stopped you jumping OUT for 1 hour after activation ...
but if you cyno jam lowsec how will you get your JF there ??????
By turning it off first [/quote] then what is the point in having a cyno jammer if you have to turn it off all the time ????? and you would have to turn it off for the other ppl trying to make it in lowsec |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:30:00 -
[59] - Quote
DarklordKarn wrote:Hello kitty island adventure ------ >
Has more players and made more money for its developers than EVE Online did for CCP?
Also, did you mean ... Deklein ? |
DarklordKarn
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:30:00 -
[60] - Quote
http://go-dl.eve-files.com/media/1105/BUTTHURT_REPORT_FORM.gif
Please fill in the above form and send to BlueMajere , Head Diplomatic Envoy |
|
David Magnus
231
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:31:00 -
[61] - Quote
Grace,
First let me preface this by saying I have been named the friendliest person in PL by current permanent CSM Vice Chair and famous blogger Ripard Teg: http://jestertrek.blogspot.ca/2012/06/fight-us-maybe.html
I want you to know that I am on your side here. I sympathize with the feeling of being betrayed, and I know how much that sucks. I want you, and everyone else, to have a fun time playing EVE.
When I first started playing EVE, I played with about 5 people from my RL work and we had dreams of carving out a piece of lowsec for ourselves. We wanted to build a drug empire, ransoming civilians into trafficking our wares into highsec. We spent nearly a week scouting out systems, bought everything we needed to setup a tower, researched how to make drugs... and then got killed by pirates with everything we had the very first day we stepped into lowsec. A couple of my friends quit playing EVE and never came back. Eventually, everyone from my office except for me quit playing EVE, while I am now a director in the most famous Alliance in the game.
Do you know the difference between me and my friends who quit? Do you know the difference between me and you?
Attitude.
Friend, until you are able to get past your sense of entitlement, you will never succeed in this game. Your "solutions" to your perceived problems with the game are to petition CCP to make sweeping mechanics changes that destroy play styles you don't like. You think you DESERVE to have a system of your own in some corner of the galaxy. This is simply not true. As Kat Ayclism attempted to explain to you: You need to work for what you have in EVE. You can't force other people to play this open-ended sandbox game the way you want, and so you have to either deal with it and learn from it and expand your horizons, or quit.
I honestly wish you the best of luck, and if at some point you are willing to lay aside your entitled, immature attitude, I'd be happy to explain any part of EVE you might be wondering about, and do whatever I can to help you succeed in this wonderful game without resorting to crying on forum thread for CCP to FORCE others to play the way you want. http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/fight-us-maybe
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/winterupdate
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/supercaps
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/pandemiclegion |
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
440
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:37:00 -
[62] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:DarklordKarn wrote:Hello kitty island adventure ------ > Has more players and made more money for its developers than EVE Online did for CCP? Also, did you mean ... Deklein ?
Yes, and is a hardcore PvP game.
GTFO.
|
Violet Winters
Angelic Eclipse.
91
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:37:00 -
[63] - Quote
David Magnus wrote:I know your pain, OP. For over two years I had a high-sec research tower on a moon about six jumps from Jita in an alt-corp.
I went away for just a single weekend, came back, and the tower was completely gone. I had been wardecced, tower destroyed, and then they retracted the war-dec in the span of three days. Needless to say, I was pretty upset as well.
Do you have any suggestions for mechanics to stop that from happening?
Before you leave, take out all valuables, stop all productions, clear it all out and don't be unprepared for something in a game where mechanics allow for simple "wars" that do one thing and that is to destroy assets.
In summary, don't be bad. Anglic Eclipse.
Lee told me to remove my signature Minmatar and Gallente FW |
Jyn Uin
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:40:00 -
[64] - Quote
David Magnus wrote:
Do you know the difference between me and my friends who quit? Do you know the difference between me and you?
Attitude.
Friend, until you are able to get past your sense of entitlement, you will never succeed in this game. Your "solutions" to your perceived problems with the game are to petition CCP to make sweeping mechanics changes that destroy play styles you don't like. You think you DESERVE to have a system of your own in some corner of the galaxy. This is simply not true. As Kat Ayclism attempted to explain to you: You need to work for what you have in EVE. You can't force other people to play this open-ended sandbox game the way you want, and so you have to either deal with it and learn from it and expand your horizons, or quit.
I honestly wish you the best of luck, and if at some point you are willing to lay aside your entitled, immature attitude, I'd be happy to explain any part of EVE you might be wondering about, and do whatever I can to help you succeed in this wonderful game without resorting to crying on forum thread for CCP to FORCE others to play the way you want.
At the Pandemic training academy we offer solutions and training to help those with butthurt. We offer courses of vary lengths and prices to fit your personal financial situation starting at 500 million iskl, please contact Bluemajere in game for enrollment.
|
Perseus Kallistratos
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:41:00 -
[65] - Quote
Grace I like your glasses they are so hipster |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:42:00 -
[66] - Quote
Teckos Pech wrote:Yes, and is a hardcore PvP game. GTFO.
Darkfall : Unholy Wars is more of a hardcore PvP game than EVE Online is now. So don't use words like "hardcore pvp" when EVE has non-PVP zones now, you can't evade or kill concord any more, and most of the players in most of the game space are NOT pvping.
EVE Online is a space mining, industry and trading game that *occasionally* has pvp. Don't pretend otherwise, because it is simply not true. If you want a real pvp game, go get one. I say this in the full knowledge that I love mining and making things :) |
Max Butched
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
29
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:42:00 -
[67] - Quote
application to snuff box accepted.
totally not mad right |
Mad Moxie
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
4
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:43:00 -
[68] - Quote
Violet Winters wrote:David Magnus wrote:I know your pain, OP. For over two years I had a high-sec research tower on a moon about six jumps from Jita in an alt-corp.
I went away for just a single weekend, came back, and the tower was completely gone. I had been wardecced, tower destroyed, and then they retracted the war-dec in the span of three days. Needless to say, I was pretty upset as well.
Do you have any suggestions for mechanics to stop that from happening? Before you leave, take out all valuables, stop all productions, clear it all out and don't be unprepared for something in a game where mechanics allow for simple "wars" that do one thing and that is to destroy assets. In summary, don't be bad.
so you take down any towers you own if you go away for a weekend ???? saying that wars have been changed so you cant retract it after only a couple days |
David Magnus
231
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:43:00 -
[69] - Quote
Violet Winters wrote:David Magnus wrote:I know your pain, OP. For over two years I had a high-sec research tower on a moon about six jumps from Jita in an alt-corp.
I went away for just a single weekend, came back, and the tower was completely gone. I had been wardecced, tower destroyed, and then they retracted the war-dec in the span of three days. Needless to say, I was pretty upset as well.
Do you have any suggestions for mechanics to stop that from happening? Before you leave, take out all valuables, stop all productions, clear it all out and don't be unprepared for something in a game where mechanics allow for simple "wars" that do one thing and that is to destroy assets. In summary, don't be bad.
Haha, yeah, I felt pretty bad about that. It had sat there for 2 years without ever being touched and so I got lazy.
The only annoying thing is that it was my main who had the standings to anchor it, so I can't put another one up quite as easily. http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/fight-us-maybe
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/winterupdate
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/supercaps
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/pandemiclegion |
Violet Winters
Angelic Eclipse.
91
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:48:00 -
[70] - Quote
Mad Moxie wrote:so you take down any towers you own if you go away for a weekend ???? saying that wars have been changed so you cant retract it after only a couple days
If it was worth several billion, I would rather be safe than come back to an empty moon. But I haven't played around with pos' for a while now, and I'm glad I don't.
David Magnus wrote:Haha, yeah, I felt pretty bad about that. It had sat there for 2 years without ever being touched and so I got lazy.
The only annoying thing is that it was my main who had the standings to anchor it, so I can't put another one up quite as easily.
Standings are a pain to get, especially faction. But oh well, I guess that's what eve is about! I've been playing almost 7 years and loved every aspect of it, it's a shame it can't be said for everyone. Anglic Eclipse.
Lee told me to remove my signature Minmatar and Gallente FW |
|
David Magnus
231
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:55:00 -
[71] - Quote
Violet Winters wrote:Mad Moxie wrote:so you take down any towers you own if you go away for a weekend ???? saying that wars have been changed so you cant retract it after only a couple days If it was worth several billion, I would rather be safe than come back to an empty moon. But I haven't played around with pos' for a while now, and I'm glad I don't. David Magnus wrote:Haha, yeah, I felt pretty bad about that. It had sat there for 2 years without ever being touched and so I got lazy.
The only annoying thing is that it was my main who had the standings to anchor it, so I can't put another one up quite as easily. Standings are a pain to get, especially faction. But oh well, I guess that's what eve is about! I've been playing almost 7 years and loved every aspect of it, it's a shame it can't be said for everyone.
Yeah, definitely - I enjoy EVE a lot and love to try new things in it as well. Also, through a careful search of the forums you'll discover that I never made a thread demanding mechanics changes when something didn't go my way, and instead I am just dealing with the unfortunate situation and learning from my mistake. http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/fight-us-maybe
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/winterupdate
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/supercaps
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/pandemiclegion |
Alaxen
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:57:00 -
[72] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:The idea of the above is to actually have well, pvp.
I'm pretty sure the idea of the above is to not have PVP.
You simply want to swap your POS Tower for an Ivory Tower. |
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
442
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 15:58:00 -
[73] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Teckos Pech wrote:Yes, and is a hardcore PvP game. GTFO. Darkfall : Unholy Wars is more of a hardcore PvP game than EVE Online is now. So don't use words like "hardcore pvp" when EVE has non-PVP zones now, you can't evade or kill concord any more, and most of the players in most of the game space are NOT pvping.
Where are these non-pvp zones you speak off? Hi sec? I lost a ship there just recently to PVP. Explain how that happend.
Your definition is stunted as well. Just about everything in Eve is PvP. Market PvP, even these forums...and word of advice your crying a blubbering here is putting a huge target on not just you, but your corp as well.
Quote:EVE Online is a space mining, industry and trading game that *occasionally* has pvp. Don't pretend otherwise, because it is simply not true. If you want a real pvp game, go get one. I say this in the full knowledge that I love mining and making things :)
Even activities that don't entail shooting guns, missiles or lasers can have PvP in it. That you don't recognize this shows you really don't understand the game.
Also, like Dave Magnus, most of the people I started playing Eve with...they don't log in much anymore. But I found new people to hang with in game. You should try that out too. |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 16:16:00 -
[74] - Quote
David Magnus wrote:... I sympathize with the feeling of being betrayed, and I know how much that sucks. I want you, and everyone else, to have a fun time playing EVE.
That's nice, but we were actually betrayed, not feeling of betrayed. A support and access agreement which was critical to our viability in remote null sec was unilaterally cancelled by Pandemic Leigon without notice, who then attempted to extort vast amounts of money from us to be able to continue to play in nullsec. We declined, because renting in nullsec means that highsec is economically superior given the current game dynamics (assuming you have no good moons, which renters do not get).
CCP failed in Odyssey to address critical economic realities: the value of ore mined went up, but so too did the cost of jump fuel. The game in its current iteration makes items from highsec essentail for play in nullsec, for example materials for warp disruptors that come only from highsec (including lowsec) stations, which must be imported as they cannot be made or realistically looted in nullsec. Implants, sov upgrades and skillbooks are the extreme of that dependency on highsec. Those factors mean that newer players simply cannot survive in nullsec without easy access to highsec, whether personally or via corp/alliance jf That means the cost of fuel is critical, as jumps are needed regardless of what is made in nullsec. As such, economically nullsec is marginal at best and a loss at worst for most alliances who are not strong enough to own good moons. That is why most of nullsec is dead and empty, despite the design intent of the Odyssey changes to ice fields and nullsec ore types. Nice idea, but fundamentally Odyssey failed in that regard. Dead and empty play space is largely doomed to stay dead and empty - there may be a short term bump as people try things, but mechanically it is better to run highsec missions and buy things in Jita than to play in nullsec, due to the dual costs of player time and JF fuel. That is why we see most of the players in the game in highsec, and most nullsec systems entirely empty except for random POS harvesting moon goo off the relatively rare profitable moons.
What did we do? We entered a dead and unwanted system, put in an iHub, took it from nothing to military 4 industry 3 inside a month, and were literally building our first carrier to be built there. At which point Pandemic Legion betrayed us by cancelling the agreement we had with them. We did nothing wrong, we never knew why PL screwed us over. Probably because we were not paying rent for the space you owned, even though your name is not on the sov map.
So you can dress it up as much as you want, you can be as caring as you want. You guys stole our home, and many of my friends simply ceased playing because they are smarter than I am. I want this game to succeed, I want to have fun in EVE. They know that unless you have a credit card or years to wait for having the skills to fly the big ships that matter, you are pretty much doomed.
You can say "join the mega zergs!" ... but if I wanted to be one of the millions of clones, I would just log in my WoW toon. Honestly that's not a bad idea, the low level battlegrounds in WoW have more challenging pvp than EVE. EVE has strategic pvp, but usually the tactical pvp is over before it begins. Like 12 caps dropping in - can't possibly beat them, probably not even able to kill even one of them, jump out. That is EVE pvp in its current form. And it's pretty boring, to be honest. I love the strategic element, but to be honest the game gets very thin very fast beyond that.
I want to have fun playing EVE. But between Odyssey and Pandemic Leigon and their ilk, the simple reality is that I can't engage in the playstyle I love. Not because I want to rule the world, but because I want to play in some musty forgotten corner of nullsec, where random neuts turn up and we reship to pvp them. But that's not possible any more - the mega alliances want *every* corner of the map, there is simply no place for independent alliances any more.
That's the inevitably consequence of mechanics that allow people to own things without being there, and instant travel enabling small numbers to project power over vast distances. Those are basic mechanics, and they doomed Darkfall 1.0 to failure - so don't be too confident in your arrogance. CCP's devs are not stupid, they know they have a problem on thier hands and are going to inevitably make changes to address them. But if you don't like my ideas and you don't provide better ones, then you get whatever they come up with. You might not like that.
Why am I so pissed? Pandemic Leigon took my home, ruined my gameplay, and led to many of my friends stopping playing. Then they have the gall to implicitly admit they don't want to play in nullsec either. WTF people, WTF. If you wanted to pvp us, you should have left us in nullsec - there were more of us playing EVE then. So yes, Pandemic, you are demonstrating the core issue with EVE at this time - nullsec is failing to achieve its game purpose, and mega alliances are exacerbating the problem. Because players with power have not addressed the issue, then inevitably CCP are going to have to step in with coding changes. So yes, if you want all of nullsec you can have it - but you can't have all of lowsec as well, because about then 5,000 players control all the moons in the game, and the other 250,000 paying customers will start to ask CCP for little simple changes, like removing nullsec from the game - after all, no-one really uses it, right?
|
suid0
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
22
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 16:18:00 -
[75] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote: Darkfall : Unholy Wars is more of a hardcore PvP game than EVE Online is now.
Posting to confirm I got trolled.... I watched the Darkfall trailer and saw loads of fairies and stuff, plus a distinct lack of spaceships.
It looks ****... enjoy your fairies |
Violet Winters
Angelic Eclipse.
92
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 16:23:00 -
[76] - Quote
suid0 wrote:Posting to confirm I got trolled.... I watched the Darkfall trailer and saw loads of fairies and stuff, plus a distinct lack of spaceships.
It looks ****... enjoy your fairies
Sounds awesome, where do I sign up? Anglic Eclipse.
Lee told me to remove my signature Minmatar and Gallente FW |
David Magnus
232
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 16:32:00 -
[77] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:David Magnus wrote:... I sympathize with the feeling of being betrayed, and I know how much that sucks. I want you, and everyone else, to have a fun time playing EVE. That's nice, but we were actually betrayed, not feeling of betrayed. A support and access agreement which was critical to our viability in remote null sec was unilaterally cancelled by Pandemic Leigon without notice, who then attempted to extort vast amounts of money from us to be able to continue to play in nullsec. At which point Pandemic Legion betrayed us by cancelling the agreement we had with them. We did nothing wrong, we never knew why PL screwed us over. Probably because we were not paying rent for the space you owned, even though your name is not on the sov map.
Are you saying that your corp/alliance wasn't paying the rent money owed according to the rental agreement? http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/fight-us-maybe
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/winterupdate
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/supercaps
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/pandemiclegion |
Emizeko Chai
Freight Club Whores in space
5
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 16:33:00 -
[78] - Quote
Hi Grace,
Have you considered wormholes? Where capital numbers are heavily limited by mass, and no supers can be fielded. That would fit your musty forgotten home idea pretty well I think. Supply lines require probing but nobody can hot drop you.
One thing I want to clear up is the contention is the mixup as far as carriers and dreads being pointable. The confusion stems from something called "coasting out". When in siege, dreads and carriers gain ewar invulnerability and cannot be pointed, but they can't jump out or move. This means that there is a very short time when siege ends, where there is short window that they might be able to jump before a point can be applied. The counters to this are in increasing order of effectiveness spamming point, neuts or a HIC.
You can easily have a home somewhere. You might have to try a few locations until you find somewhere out of the way enough, is all.
Best of luck. |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 16:36:00 -
[79] - Quote
suid0 wrote:Grace Ishukone wrote: Darkfall : Unholy Wars is more of a hardcore PvP game than EVE Online is now.
Posting to confirm I got trolled.... I watched the Darkfall trailer and saw loads of fairies and stuff, plus a distinct lack of spaceships. It looks ****... enjoy your fairies
Don't watch old Darkfall 1.0 videos and mistake them for Darkfall : Unholy Wars (they remade the game entirely).
But yes, when you can kill some unsuspecting player mining, walk up to them and hack their head off to finish them, then rifle though their stuff to see what you want to take of theirs, it's pvp all right. That the miner might blast you with a fireball rather than have the good grace to meekly fall down just adds to the spice.
Mining ships in EVE never kill the attacker. Concord does that.
As for spaceships ... you do remember we can't actually pilot them, right? EVE VR looks amazing, but again it's a game with wonderful potential that could outstrip EVE itself as a commercially important product for CCP. EVE Online won't close its servers any time soon ... but it may well carebear it up more and more and MUCH more than it has already. If you disagree or ask why, then you have not been paying attention to CCP's business model and statements around Dust. It's meant to draw new players into EVE ... and to be honest, the comments above are simply reinforcing the widely held perception that if you don't have 2 years or more training time to waste (or a credit card), you really are pretty much locked out of the more interesting pvp EVE Online has to offer.
Oh and skills ... WTF CCP. I go away for a couple years, come back, and see all these nice new skills to *widen* the gap between new and not-new players,. such that you get vets in advanced ships that *always* jam newer players. Always works, never misses, never fails ... these are terms that apply in WoW PvP. To see skills added that effectively implement them into EVE Online as well just makes me cringe.
So yes, CCP. You buffed all kinds of things to hell and back ... if you keep that approach, do the whole job, not just parts of it. Buff POS guns too, POS gunnery skills, and anti-cyno toys for lowsec. While you are at it, bring back mines - but make them anti-capital only, lowsec and null. And add minesweeper mods / specailist minelayer ship / minesweeper ship. Why not? |
Alaxen
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 16:43:00 -
[80] - Quote
I don't think you get EVE. |
|
waferzankko
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
25
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 17:16:00 -
[81] - Quote
hi guys!!! |
Kat Ayclism
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
4
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 17:17:00 -
[82] - Quote
Hush now, baby, baby, don't you cry. Mama's gonna make all of your nightmares come true. Mama's gonna put all of her fears into you. Mama's gonna keep you right here under her wing. She won't let you fly but she might let you sing! |
Violet Winters
Angelic Eclipse.
92
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 17:18:00 -
[83] - Quote
hello! Anglic Eclipse.
Lee told me to remove my signature Minmatar and Gallente FW |
Hy Jack
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 17:26:00 -
[84] - Quote
Is there a "Tears and Butthurt" forum this could be moved to instead? The OFFICIAL Kings of Low Sec |
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
444
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 18:23:00 -
[85] - Quote
Alaxen wrote:I don't think you get EVE.
I think this is a reasonable conclusion....which is odd given the age of the poster. |
Makalu Zarya
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 18:27:00 -
[86] - Quote
wow this thread is pure gold |
Istyn
Freight Club Whores in space
226
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 18:31:00 -
[87] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote: I think the current game design is absolutely atrocious. What is worse is that I am not alone in that, and the attrition rate of players out of EVE is appallingly high. That is why EVE Online continues to badly under perform as a commercial product, always being close to greatness, but never quite making it.
Eve has gained subscribers pretty much year on year for 10 years, something nearly every MMO developer is extremely jealous of - considering most are now having to turn to F2P models.
I'm afraid no matter how much you wish it to be the case, the game isn't actually failing because it allows people to kick sand in your face. It's thriving because of it. |
Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1653
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 18:52:00 -
[88] - Quote
This can't be a real thread |
SweetAshley
D00M. Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 19:01:00 -
[89] - Quote
I vote Trolling Thread |
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
973
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 19:09:00 -
[90] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Title says it all.
Sick of Pandemic Leigon and other nullsec mega-rich alliances cynoing into lowsec, killing every tower on every moon vaguely worth anything, and having 0 effective risk at all. Even with 16 hardneres is takes less than 10 minutes for a PL fleet to kill a large tower from reinforced, meaning that even if someone else wants to jump in to pvp them, the cap fleet has arrived, killed the tower, and left before anyone can actually pvp them.
This is meant to be a game. There is no fun in "no way to kill them" fights.
So one or more of the changes below are needed - which are useful / not?
1. Only 6 capitals, maximum, in space in any lowsec system. 2. Lowsec POS get 500% bonus defence to attacks by capitals. 3. Carriers and Dreads in LOWSEC can be warp jammed by anything. 4. POS guns get upgraded radically so they can actually HURT capitals. 5. Only two ships able to jump to one cyno each minute. 6. Ships jumping into lowsec cannot jump out until their combat timers have ended.
The idea of the above is to actually have well, pvp. Currently the game is whoever has the most isk (i.e. credit card ability) just wins. That's rubbish. Need actual pvp over static objects, not capital blat fleets that have no effective risk.
PvP is meant to be risk vs reward, fun from succeeding and achieving objectives and surviving the risks. It's not happening - much of pvp in EVE is horribly boring, and rightly slammed by players who like more than spreadsheets for their gameplay.
Actually the real issue is POS guns doing lol dmg. A single non siege Dread can easily tank a large pos full of guns/missile batteries with no much trouble, drop a couple dreads and carriers and it's cake party.
The real solution is to make those batteries hit really really hard as they should but give them capital guns tracking and explosion radius, eventually add a siege upgrade so small/medium guns have a huge dps increase but can't hit anything smaller than a 500m sign radius.
Killing the pos shouldn't be the hard work to do, right now it's like every single structure in this game, a matter of numbers and afk shooting until you're told to stop while watching some film. The real hard work to do should be killing the POS guns and by hard I mean that if you want to take a POS down you should be really motivated and have a strategies to kill pos guns, bring more capitals or even supers to the field, put them at risk and bring more capital/super fights, force them to fight and put those assets at risk.
Right now all you need to be afk safe shooting a pos is as easy as warp at 150 from POS and snipe all modules with 0 risk, which is stupid, boring and brings nothing constructive or amazing as game play. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |
|
Doddy
Dark-Rising
854
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 19:45:00 -
[91] - Quote
Dude, dreads and carriers can already be warp jammed by anything ......
There is nothing wrong with how it works currently, other than all the blobbing up. And that is just a sad fact of human nature, can't win on your own, bring friends.
A large pos can easily kill a seiged dread, assuming you have gunners. If you don't its your problem. Its no use against a super blob of course, and i think pos being able to tackle supers would be an extremely good move on ccps part.
It should be something like this:
Want to attack a deathstar (with gunners)? You will lose some dreads unless you have a big enough fleet to incap the guns within a couple of minutes.
Dont wnat to lose some dreads? Bring some supercarriers but the pos can tackle them so there is a risk involved.
To that end the only buffs to pos i would say make sense are -
Warp scrambling batteries can tackle supers.
CPU using pos mods do not offline on reinforcing (so no easy disengagement without incapping the scrams, and a tower coming out of reinforce already has its hardeners on).
The rest of it is just you crying about blobs and has nothing to so with pos. |
Whitehound
1551
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 19:45:00 -
[92] - Quote
Unexpected, but OP has struck gold.
Instead of having created a mediocre discussion on game mechanics did he summon an unexpected high amount of PL trolls out from under their bridges. It is not the kind of success one expects to find in a discussion forum, but nevertheless it is a success.
It can well count as a sign of weaknesses in game mechanics when PL is not getting any good challenges out of the game, but starts trolling the forums, and thereby are making a case for the OP rather than one against him. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |
Perseus Kallistratos
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 19:57:00 -
[93] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Unexpected, but OP has struck gold.
Instead of having created a mediocre discussion on game mechanics did he summon an unexpected high amount of PL trolls out from under their bridges. It is not the kind of success one expects to find in a discussion forum, but nevertheless it is a success.
It can well count as a sign of weaknesses in game mechanics when PL is not getting any good challenges out of the game, but starts trolling the forums, and thereby are making a case for the OP rather than one against him.
Yeah you got it. When one moves to the forums its because they have moved to a higher plane of existence within EVE itself. |
Whitehound
1551
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 20:09:00 -
[94] - Quote
Perseus Kallistratos wrote:Yeah you got it. When one moves to the forums its because they have moved to a higher plane of existence within EVE itself. Your comment itself reads disconnected. Who do you mean by "one" and who are "they"?
And why are so many PL members not simply ignoring the topic when they are not interested to discuss it, but are trying to kill it by trolling? I thought the thread was not much alive to begin with, but you guys certainly have given it a new life. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |
Istyn
Freight Club Whores in space
226
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 20:11:00 -
[95] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:[
Actually the real issue is POS guns doing lol dmg. A single non siege Dread can easily tank a large pos full of guns/missile batteries with no much trouble, drop a couple dreads and carriers and it's cake party.
That's why neut batteries exist. |
suid0
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
22
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 20:22:00 -
[96] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:suid0 wrote:Grace Ishukone wrote: Darkfall : Unholy Wars is more of a hardcore PvP game than EVE Online is now.
Posting to confirm I got trolled.... I watched the Darkfall trailer and saw loads of fairies and stuff, plus a distinct lack of spaceships. It looks ****... enjoy your fairies Don't watch old Darkfall 1.0 videos and mistake them for Darkfall : Unholy Wars (they remade the game entirely).
apologies, the video was titled 'Darkfall Unholy Wars Trailer' on a site with a banner saying 'DarkFall -Unholy Wars-'
I guess my googlefu failed me and I clearly looked at a trailer for some other crappy game with the same name. |
Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1654
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 20:28:00 -
[97] - Quote
Whitehound wrote: And why are so many PL members not simply ignoring the topic when they are not interested to discuss it, but are trying to kill it by trolling? .
We're not trying to kill it by trolling, we're laughing because the OP is an idiot, theres a much longer chat log with this guy that we have internally, he's mad somebody shot his tower so he made a thread, truely this is ground breaking news and somebody should have started t thread about this long ago.
|
Widowscar
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 20:33:00 -
[98] - Quote
posting to check monthly kills.
Oh wait. |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 21:00:00 -
[99] - Quote
Whitehound, I saw what you did there... If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
Violet Winters
Angelic Eclipse.
92
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 21:03:00 -
[100] - Quote
Doddy wrote: Warp scrambling batteries can tackle supers.
This guy..... I like this guy.
Anglic Eclipse.
Lee told me to remove my signature Minmatar and Gallente FW |
|
SweetAshley
D00M. Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 21:04:00 -
[101] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Perseus Kallistratos wrote:Yeah you got it. When one moves to the forums its because they have moved to a higher plane of existence within EVE itself. Your comment itself reads disconnected. Who do you mean by "one" and who are "they"? And why are so many PL members not simply ignoring the topic when they are not interested to discuss it, but are trying to kill it by trolling? I thought the thread was not much alive to begin with, but you guys certainly have given it a new life.
Well that means the group and organization known as PL they are the they and the one means PK has moved to the forums at a higher existance :p, See PK I got your back :p |
Elektrea
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
37
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 00:27:00 -
[102] - Quote
I've seen better suggestions by Grarr before, let that sink in. |
Sernum
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
30
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 00:28:00 -
[103] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Kings of Lowsec
|
gr ant
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 00:36:00 -
[104] - Quote
I have a simple solution to your problem
unsub |
Evangelina Nolen
Sama Guild
35
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 03:50:00 -
[105] - Quote
Bait & gank their caps. Caps go down very fast with 150k focused dps on them. |
Tupac'alive'in Serbia
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 03:50:00 -
[106] - Quote
if we are in supers and a super-scramming pos mod points one of us we just kill that mod and you pubbies still coward and don't fight
hope that helps
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pcyxFNuQlwo |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 04:19:00 -
[107] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:This can't be a real thread
We have a winner!
Well spotted Grath. It's not - other than it is real in that it has pulled out the views of players from one of the nullsec corps that is currently responsible for undermining the Odyssey changes. It is clear from the above that such players consider there is nothing wrong with a tiny proportion of the game playerbase controlling vast quantities of the gamespace due to the current SOV and station mechanics. It would have been inappropriate to continue pushing for changes to the game mechanics without seeking the views of such players, so I did.
The reactions from the Pandemic Leigon players simply make the real point - that rapid travel and the decade old nullsec map are enabling absentee ownership and denial of game growth for this game.
EVE Online has been growing year after year, for many years. Sure. So what? It is about return on commercial investment in the face of increasingly sophisticated competition in a very small niche game space. If EVE Online wants to be more than an ancient curiosity, they need to continue to improve their game - and they have made many design changes in the past 3 years that mirror changes made in other games, which in those other games contributed to the ending of service of those products.
I wasn't kidding or trolling when I said many of my friends have quit over losing our home in nullsec. That 'get a home,. love the game, lose your home, quit the game" dynamic has been present ever since Ultima Online invented and added player housing. How to balance the security of your home, against preserving pvp, is one of the major design challenges in modern MMOs. That there are so many underused "homes" in EVE that are empty because of the map and players preventing others who would otherwise bring pvp to those dead and pointless areas smacks of poor design choices by CCP.
The question becomes what to do about it.
Yes I trolled you guys into saying more than you probably ever intended to, however the point remains the same - the game is currently broken from a pvp perspective. There is a major schism between ants and tank drivers, and between highsec and low/nullsec. Odyssey was unashamedly designed to pull and push players into low / nullsec, and while it has worked to some extent for lowsec, it is now clear that is at the expense of nullsec. If you want small ship pvp (ants), everyone moves to lowsec. Why? You never get that gameplay in most of nullsec - you get afk cloaky campers, people who simply dock when a neut is detected one system either side of where they play, and capital level play (tanks pvp). When people famous for their pvp in nullsec are moving to lowsec because they are not getting the pvp they want from nullsec, there is simply no question that there is an issue.
The solution originally posited above is effectively what would happen if Nullsec PVPers were locked out of lowsec by game mechanics? The obvious answer from PL players above is that they would cry, and cry a lot, to CCP.
But if nullsec players have been pushed to lowsec / highsec by the mega alliances players, and the mega alliance players themselves are now moving to lowsec too because they are so bored in nullsec, that really does underscore the point for CCP that the nullsec map and sov mechanics are simply not working. They need a massive overhaul. What shape that should take is of course up for discussion, but this thread has served its purpose - drawing out the views of players who are reluctant to say what they really think. Nothing quite like getting someone's guard down to then get them to speak their mind.
You guys got drunk on tears, and basically admitted that Pandemic Leigon is a sov owning alliance who kick alliances who do not pay their rentals, even though you pretend in the beginning that you are not renting space at all and don't own sov. You do, in fact if not in name. You also have revealed that you are for want of a better word, bored. Nullsec should be providing ll the pvp you can handle, all the stories and tears you can stand. Yet you all took the time to fall for my troll post, and indeed have even admitted to moving gto lowsec to play, implicitly because there actually *is* pvp in lowsec.
So yes, CCP. Do it. Add highsec islands to all distant parts of the map, with attendant lowsec space around them, or redraw the map so that no-where is more than 2 jump cal 5 jumps from Highsec. The economics of the gamespace simply do not make any sense for anyone who is not a renter, because as PL themselves so helpfully explained, you can make more ISK for less risk in Highsec, without wasting time travelling. When the "elite pvpers" from nullsec have moved to lowsec because they are so beored between the occasional tank vs tank sov battle, it's time to scarp the current map and do it over. Every system should be worth playing in (i.e. better than highsec in one or more ways), not just 1 in 12 with most of nullsec being utterly pointless waste of data space and player time while they look for someone to pvp ... which usually means you see one person who made it to their POS or station, and system after system of the only people in local being the ones who flew in with you, even in outpost systems. That's not the sign of a healthy game, given nullsec is meant to be where the elite live. Most of it is currently just home for bots and moon harvesters, and the latest crop of newbies who have rented but not yet worked out that they are losing money over playing in high sec, and can (and often are) very spectacularly screwed over such as was demonstrated last week. So. Fix it, or watch this product continue to under perform commercially, with the risk that when a better equivalent game that *did* fix such issues comes along, EVE goes into mothball mode. 10 years - nullsec deserves love.. |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 07:09:00 -
[108] - Quote
I thought it was common knowledge that PL along with NC. and Nulli are running a rental business in 0.0. Though I cannot really see PL doing any protection for 'pubbies'.
Anyway what you are focussed on is that for a small or medium sized alliance moving into 0.0 as your natural development is not possible, you either rent or you stay in low sec/high sec, that is your ceiling. You cannot carve out an area of your own with the current sov system and the pure super/titan power of the major powers.
Your idea of pockets of High Sec surrounded by low sec is one way of sorting out the bases that smaller entities need to be able to operate, I was fixated on the put anywhere, stealth mode new POS system, but neither of them will happen because CCP is so focussed on the major alliances and their needs for the headline major battles that perk up interest in the gaming world, in fact with the recent changes to Grav sites not requiring probing they removed another group of independents from 0.0 and buffed the power of major sov alliances.
Over the last two months I noted three ex-corp mates who were very committed to this game at one point stop playing, because they could not go into 0.0 on their terms, and this is the reality that CCP has with their game, those players would have continued playing if they had a way to progress, but PL and their ilk refer to them as pubbies and laugh at them leaving a game that they hardly play themselves.
About a month and a half after the fall of IRC I took a trip from Cobalt Edge to Stain, I met 5 people the whole way before I arrived in Stain. Which had a lot more people. The major 0.0 entities are desperate to find ways of making it difficult to operate in NPC 0.0, wanting the ability to encap station services in those systems, I had the impression that CCP was listening to them, but so far they have not applied this and I hope they never do. Because if they did NPC 0.0 will be as dead as sov 0.0 with every single station service in NPC regions encapped.
At the moment all you have is the nerf HS crowd pushing things like removing perfect refine in HS, removing gun mining, etc., but that will kill the game, many of us just potter around building up assets waiting for changes to 0.0 which will never come based on CCP's attitude. The ice mining changes seemed to me to be aimed at removing the abilitry of these major entities to project power, however it also makes it even more difficult for small and medium sized entities to get a toe hold.
Personally I think that CCP need to make it so that if the NPC's are not kept down, then the sov modules will be degraded or even removed by the NPC pirates. Do that and perhaps we will see changes, but don't hold your breath on it, I doubt CCP have the bottle to do it! If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1588
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 09:47:00 -
[109] - Quote
ITT: 7 year old miners, that don't understand how to tackle capitals write manifesto about how not mad they are. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Kat Ayclism
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
5
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 09:48:00 -
[110] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote: :words: :words: Yes I trolled you guys into saying more than you probably ever intended to, however the point remains the same - the game is currently broken from a pvp perspective. :words: :holy hell more freaking words: :more words:
Gosh you sure "got" us. Pro-tier trolling-with-your-actual-views there friend. |
|
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 11:11:00 -
[111] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Anyway what you are focussed on is that for a small or medium sized alliance moving into 0.0 as your natural development is not possible, you either rent or you stay in low sec/high sec, that is your ceiling. You cannot carve out an area of your own with the current sov system and the pure super/titan power of the major powers.
Well put. Unfortunately that is the problem, because people who want to do that and who do not wish to join a mega alliance hit that "glass ceiling". Then being unable to advance past that point, their playstyle stagnates, their player activity tapers off over time, they bleed players, then cease to exist.
There needs to be someplace for such corps to go which does not require them to be serfs to the large empires. Because while the large empire having serfs is perfectly fine as a game dynamic, the tendency of Western players to simply quit rather than suffer becoming a serf with the grind elements and poor economic consequences that flow with that means that player social groups tend to rise though the game, and at the one - three year point hit that limit, and once enough have left, they all quit. That is still a decent retention path, however many more corps simply cannot achieve even that, and fail out much sooner. Bottom line, if we can keep those corps and get them out in nullsec playing as independents, it will improve the game.
Entire reigons being blue is fine - but you can't do that and also say EVE Online is a pvp game. It's a farming empire game, where a tiny number of pvp corps and players compete to control the farmers. Farmville in space. |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 11:21:00 -
[112] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote: It's a farming empire game, where a tiny number of pvp corps and players compete to control the farmers. Farmville in space.
That is what it is, farming either being ISK, resources, or kills and often all three, it would not surprise me that PL renters had PL alt accounts AFK cloaky camping them and hot dropping them too. If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
2392
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 11:30:00 -
[113] - Quote
Holy cow, the faucet never ends. We're drowning in tears over here.
OP - face it. One person whining that they can't succeed will NEVER succeed. Your friends are quitters, you're feeling entitled to gameplay you not only haven't, but apparently CAN'T earn, and you're blaming everyone but yourself.
HTFU
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |
suid0
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
25
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 11:37:00 -
[114] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote: There needs to be someplace for such corps to go which does not require them to be serfs to the large empires.
What? like Syndicate, Great Wildlands, Venal, Curse, Delve (part of), Geminate (single station), Outer Ring, Pure Blind, Stain?
Yeah, if only
Dracvlad wrote:it would not surprise me that PL renters had PL alt accounts AFK cloaky camping them and hot dropping them too.
That would be like mugging your wife after she uses an ATM.... pointless and stupid. |
Dirk Action
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 12:01:00 -
[115] - Quote
ah yes the old "oh **** I look like a ****** better pretend I was trolling" troll
you got me good, who should I contract all my assets to as I clearly must quit the game now |
Dirk Action
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 12:06:00 -
[116] - Quote
was the PM with Kat a troll too? that looked like pretty real crying and whining to me :iiam: |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 12:17:00 -
[117] - Quote
suid0 wrote:Dracvlad wrote:it would not surprise me that PL renters had PL alt accounts AFK cloaky camping them and hot dropping them too. That would be like mugging your wife after she uses an ATM.... pointless and stupid.
That is a rather odd thing to call a pubbie renter that is likely to be bad at PvP, they are the ATM and are to be milked as much as they can bear, my suggestion fits in totally with your alliances attitude, wow you need to improve your forum warrioring, its pretty poor. If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Polarized.
896
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 12:26:00 -
[118] - Quote
Faction warfare and Dust mercs should play a part in cyno jamming low sec systems. Putting work in since 2010. |
suid0
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 12:38:00 -
[119] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:suid0 wrote:Dracvlad wrote:it would not surprise me that PL renters had PL alt accounts AFK cloaky camping them and hot dropping them too. That would be like mugging your wife after she uses an ATM.... pointless and stupid. That is a rather odd thing to call a pubbie renter that is likely to be bad at PvP, they are the ATM and are to be milked as much as they can bear, my suggestion fits in totally with your alliances attitude, wow you need to improve your forum warrioring, its pretty poor.
Are you really that illiterate or just trying too hard? |
Joyfie
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 12:45:00 -
[120] - Quote
My morning is made
Cheers PL! |
|
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 12:54:00 -
[121] - Quote
suid0 wrote:Dracvlad wrote:suid0 wrote:Dracvlad wrote:it would not surprise me that PL renters had PL alt accounts AFK cloaky camping them and hot dropping them too. That would be like mugging your wife after she uses an ATM.... pointless and stupid. That is a rather odd thing to call a pubbie renter that is likely to be bad at PvP, they are the ATM and are to be milked as much as they can bear, my suggestion fits in totally with your alliances attitude, wow you need to improve your forum warrioring, its pretty poor. Are you really that illiterate or just trying too hard?
If you say so, I just found your comparison a bit incorrect and correctly defined the renter as a ATM not a wife or partner, does that explain it better? If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
suid0
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 13:13:00 -
[122] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:suid0 wrote:Dracvlad wrote:suid0 wrote:Dracvlad wrote:it would not surprise me that PL renters had PL alt accounts AFK cloaky camping them and hot dropping them too. That would be like mugging your wife after she uses an ATM.... pointless and stupid. That is a rather odd thing to call a pubbie renter that is likely to be bad at PvP, they are the ATM and are to be milked as much as they can bear, my suggestion fits in totally with your alliances attitude, wow you need to improve your forum warrioring, its pretty poor. Are you really that illiterate or just trying too hard? If you say so, I just found your comparison a bit incorrect and correctly defined the renter as a ATM not a wife or partner, does that explain it better?
yes that helps
you are both illiterate and trying too hard
thankyou for clearing that up. |
Alsyth
38
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 13:15:00 -
[123] - Quote
"6. Ships jumping into lowsec cannot jump out until their combat timers have ended."
That's actually a cool idea. CONCORD using the same "magic" that prevents us from using doomsday, bubbles or bombs could prevent capitals from jumping out as long as they have a suspect/criminal flag in lowsec. And regular points working on Motherships would be a very welcome addition too.
Will not hurt smaller entities who can wardec when they want to kill the POS/POCO of their arch-enemy, but would really hurt: - the wealthy alliances who can hotdrop 10 Supercarriers to steal a pos or kill a lone carrier without taking any risk. Being forced to stay on field at least 15 minutes would make them think twice, being tackled by regular ships too. - the hotdroppers who would think twice before sending their remote-repping archon on a fight at a gate/belt
All in all, it would greatly improve lowsec, |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 13:22:00 -
[124] - Quote
suid0 wrote:Dracvlad wrote:suid0 wrote:Dracvlad wrote:suid0 wrote:
That would be like mugging your wife after she uses an ATM.... pointless and stupid.
That is a rather odd thing to call a pubbie renter that is likely to be bad at PvP, they are the ATM and are to be milked as much as they can bear, my suggestion fits in totally with your alliances attitude, wow you need to improve your forum warrioring, its pretty poor. Are you really that illiterate or just trying too hard? If you say so, I just found your comparison a bit incorrect and correctly defined the renter as a ATM not a wife or partner, does that explain it better? yes that helps you are both illiterate and trying too hard thankyou for clearing that up.
If you a member of the great and all powerful pubbie hating PL are stupid enough to define a renter as a partner then being called an idiot by you I will take as a compliment... If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
suid0
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
28
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 13:52:00 -
[125] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:
If you a member of the great and all powerful pubbie hating PL are stupid enough to define a renter as a partner then being called an idiot by you I will take as a compliment...
No one defined anyone as anything. It was a comparison of action and outcome. You really are trying way too hard pushing your literal interpretation.
Also take it how you like, still doesn't change the fact.
|
Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1592
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 14:22:00 -
[126] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:If you a member of the great and all powerful pubbie hating PL are stupid enough to define a renter as a partner then being called an idiot by you I will take as a compliment...
Another fine example of why you shouldn't mad post. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 14:30:00 -
[127] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Dracvlad wrote:If you a member of the great and all powerful pubbie hating PL are stupid enough to define a renter as a partner then being called an idiot by you I will take as a compliment... Another fine example of why you shouldn't mad post.
Mad, perfectly rational old bean, anyway I thought you were trolling the Marmite thread... If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
gawrshmapooo
Es and Whizz Hedonistic Imperative
12
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:29:00 -
[128] - Quote
OP please either grow some ******* balls and deal with it or biomass.
Buttmad. |
Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1593
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 16:09:00 -
[129] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Mad, perfectly rational old bean, anyway I thought you were trolling the Marmite thread...
Can you excise some of that rationality and find a comma?
Thanks in advance. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 16:12:00 -
[130] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Mad, perfectly rational old bean, anyway I thought you were trolling the Marmite thread... Can you excise some of that rationality and find a comma? Thanks in advance.
Ooooh now you are a grammer ****! If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
|
Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1593
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 16:26:00 -
[131] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Ooooh now you are a grammer ****!
Not at all, just commenting that the line I originally was criticizing made absolutely zero sense.
You should work on that. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 18:42:00 -
[132] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Ooooh now you are a grammer ****! Not at all, just commenting that the line I originally was criticizing made absolutely zero sense. You should work on that.
"If you a member of the great and all powerful pubbie hating PL are stupid enough to define a renter as a partner then being called an idiot by you I will take as a compliment..."
I deliberately wrote it like that as a breathless statement, that is rather amusing that you think to mention the lack of comments, it was deliberate. If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
Swiftstrike1
Interfector INC. Fade 2 Black
105
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 18:45:00 -
[133] - Quote
I approve of making supercapitals vulnerable to normal points, but perhaps give them a role bonus of +25 warp strength to compensate? I have lots of ideas. -áThey're not always well thought through, but they are always well intentioned. -á |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 23:39:00 -
[134] - Quote
Dirk Action wrote:was the PM with Kat a troll too? that looked like pretty real crying and whining to me :iiam:
You are so delightful, assuming that I am someone else to justify everything. Assumptions will get you killed, because you make an ass of yourself. Serach me, search my comments. Go read that thread of mine about mining ships - and then reflect that CCP made major changes to mining ship design partly as a result of that campaign. Led by me. Make no mistake - you play your pvp games, but I play players vs devs. So the more you attack me personally, the more you tell me to quit, the more certain it is that you are pushing CCP to change the current design - because ultimately CCP do not *want* players to quit. Nor do I - the more players in this game, and more playstyles and play preferences this game caters for, the stronger the income to CCP, the greater the potential to develop improvements in *every* area of the game.
Oh, and while we are on the topic, given Pandemic Legion are clearly bored silly despite their participation in nullsec warts, everyone who plays in lowsec / near null should find the nearest few PL POS near to them, and blow them up. Why? Well it's our duty - if a pvp alliance is bored, and think the game mechanics are perfect the way they are, then let us do to them what they do to newbies, and see how they feel about that.
Indeed I would have thought Goonswarm with their numbers would be the masters of asymmetric warfare. wouldn't it make life interesting if they killed every N3 and PL lowsec POS in the next couple days? Let's face it, the nearest most players in this game get to capital vs capital (tank) warfare is reading EVE24. Death by swarms of ants? |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 23:41:00 -
[135] - Quote
Swiftstrike1 wrote:I approve of making supercapitals vulnerable to normal points, but perhaps give them a role bonus of +25 warp strength to compensate?
Very good idea, and yes, totally appropriate that it should need a *lot* of regular points to achieve that. Bravo Sir! |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 23:48:00 -
[136] - Quote
Alsyth wrote:"6. Ships jumping into lowsec cannot jump out until their combat timers have ended."
That's actually a cool idea. CONCORD using the same "magic" that prevents us from using doomsday, bubbles or bombs could prevent capitals from jumping out as long as they have a suspect/criminal flag in lowsec. And regular points working on Motherships would be a very welcome addition too.
Will not hurt smaller entities who can wardec when they want to kill the POS/POCO of their arch-enemy, but would really hurt: - the wealthy alliances who can hotdrop 10 Supercarriers to steal a pos or kill a lone carrier without taking any risk. Being forced to stay on field at least 15 minutes would make them think twice, being tackled by regular ships too. - the hotdroppers who would think twice before sending their remote-repping archon on a fight at a gate/belt
All in all, it would greatly improve lowsec,
Thank you for your clearly well considered feedback on the actual topic! |
Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1593
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 00:05:00 -
[137] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Pandemic Legion are clearly bored silly despite their participation in nullsec warts
uwot m8? Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Dirk Action
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
118
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 00:49:00 -
[138] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Dirk Action wrote:was the PM with Kat a troll too? that looked like pretty real crying and whining to me :iiam: You are so delightful, assuming that I am someone else to justify everything.
you going on about being "betrayed' by PL (let's face it; pay your rent money on time and you won't have to get evicted~) and crying about the same thing in the private conversation with Kat Aclysm is pretty much a dead giveaway, sorry |
Heavy Met4l Queen
Dark Corner Projects
37
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 04:41:00 -
[139] - Quote
And on a day of POS bashing and killmails, much butthurt was to be found. And the tears were plentiful, and the harvest of them great; and there was much rejoicing... I hate therefore i am... |
Emrys Ap'Morgravaine
Minmatar Ship Construction Services Ushra'Khan
59
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 04:44:00 -
[140] - Quote
It's rare that I find the will to read beyond the first page in most threads on these forums, but I'm glad I did. Thanks all, I've not been so heartily entertained in weeks.
To the OP - Eve is PvP in all aspects, Player vs Player - that does NOT inherently mean shooting and blowing up of ships.
To PL - GG :)
Em. |
|
Kat Ayclism
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
11
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 04:48:00 -
[141] - Quote
Heavy Met4l Queen wrote:And on a day of POS bashing and killmails, much butthurt was to be found. And the tears were plentiful, and the harvest of them great; and there was much rejoicing... 1 Free moon = 1 Bil per month Tear-filled pm while doing green boxes = 1 boring hour Resulting tear thread and frantic denial of being the same person despite crying about all the same things = priceless |
Heavy Met4l Queen
Dark Corner Projects
41
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 04:56:00 -
[142] - Quote
Kat Ayclism wrote:Heavy Met4l Queen wrote:And on a day of POS bashing and killmails, much butthurt was to be found. And the tears were plentiful, and the harvest of them great; and there was much rejoicing... 1 Free moon = 1 Bil per month Tear-filled pm while doing green boxes = 1 boring hour Resulting tear thread and frantic denial of being the same person despite crying about all the same things = priceless
Makes it all worth the effort doesn't it? I hate therefore i am... |
Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1593
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 05:05:00 -
[143] - Quote
Kat Ayclism wrote:1 Free moon = 1 Bil per month Tear-filled pm while doing green boxes = 1 boring hour Resulting tear thread and frantic denial of being the same person despite crying about all the same things = priceless
:a2m:? Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Ktorn Sinus
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
5
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 05:28:00 -
[144] - Quote
[ 2013.07.17 12:35:23 ] Lady Flute > I *like* mining [ 2013.07.17 12:35:33 ] Lady Flute > we used to love mining to keep the indy level over 3 [ 2013.07.17 12:35:41 ] Lady Flute > that is the gameplay you guys killed [ 2013.07.17 12:35:46 ] Lady Flute > we mined enough for a carrier a month [ 2013.07.17 12:35:53 ] Lady Flute > even with pvp attacks [ 2013.07.17 12:36:07 ] Lady Flute > but PL betrayed us, we had to quit nullsec [ 2013.07.17 12:36:29 ] Lady Flute > so now ... most of us play WoW, battlefield 3, or world of tanks [ 2013.07.17 12:36:33 ] Lady Flute > I **** you not. |
Ganthrithor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
557
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 06:02:00 -
[145] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote: 3. Carriers and Dreads in LOWSEC can be warp jammed by anything.
Halp, I'm tackled by a planet!
You know that the lowliest, meta-1 warp disruptor will prevent capships from warping, right? Even in LOWSEC! |
Ganthrithor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
558
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 06:09:00 -
[146] - Quote
Also, thread gets better and better with each page. Thanks, PL <3 |
Valleria Darkmoon
Heretic Army Heretic Initiative
122
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 06:32:00 -
[147] - Quote
PL kills our POS all the time...I think it's why we have one, so PL doesn't get too bored when they come round.
Sure there's nothing we can really do about it. We're a small time low sec operation and have no interest in joining the blob fest, the price we pay for this is not having nice towers.
As for not being able to do anything while there are supers around PL used to warp Nyxes to my frigate fights at top belt. By the time that fat ass aligns and warps in the fight is over, I've looted the wreck and I'm there to fire one volley at it on the off chance it dies later without a session change. Even if it does kill my Incursus, how many tears do you think I'm going to shed over it? Also there's several jump gates in Amamake. They're a big hurdle for a Nyx. But unless they are willing to park supers at every celestial in system they are very easy to avoid and if they were to do it just leave system. The trail of cyno alts required to follow you system to system could be considered a victory in itself if they do actually follow you around all night.
I started into PvP with 4 million SP and that was back when you had to spend the first 30 days minimum on learning skills, so it's not like PvP is impossible with low SP, but are you going to take out PL with 4 or 5 guys with 4 million SP, NO! Are you going to beat down PL with 4 or 5 guys with 90 million SP each, again, the answer is NO!
I think you still need to learn that (nearly) anything is permitted here and the sooner you understand the full scope of what that implies the better that lack of understanding will always hold you back until you fully understand. |
Valleria Darkmoon
Heretic Army Heretic Initiative
122
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 07:25:00 -
[148] - Quote
I've read more of this topic now and you mention several times that EVE is a failure as a commercial product.
With one notable and tragic exception the customer base has continuously expanded since I started playing in 2007. I base this on the average number of logins i used to see in 2007 compared with now. The retention of those who last more than a few months is also high, as I looked up a loss mail from 2008 that had 37 people on the mail and of that 30 had updated portraits which means they've played in at least the last two years (can't remember exactly when the avatars changed).
The fact that EVE is still going after 10 years in an era where telling an investor that you want to make an MMO will immediately require you to talk them down off their window ledge speaks volumes. Most MMOs are dead or dying or switching to free-to-play (or two of three, you can't be simultaneously dead and dying) inside of a year. A lot of this probably has to do with the fact that EVE occupies a niche in the gaming community that as far as I am aware is not filled by anyone else but that is irrelevant. Who else has a brutal, cut-throat sandbox with a storyline almost completely dictated by the players all taking place in space where you can practically watch another version of human history unfold at high speed. No one as far as I know.
Yes, EVE loses a lot of subscriptions but this is likely due to design as with the way the game is made I don't think it could support having 11 million subscriptions without fracturing the servers and a big part of the goal here was to have everyone on a single server. Commercial success is all a matter of meeting your targets and as CCP soldiers on with an ever expanding subscriber base and meeting their game design targets it can not be labelled a failure. The reality is that EVE is harsh, most are weeded out quickly and many do not make the cut. If that is you be glad it didn't take you too too long to find that out. |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3695
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 07:31:00 -
[149] - Quote
Valleria Darkmoon wrote:I've read more of this topic now and you mention several times that EVE is a failure as a commercial product.
With one notable and tragic exception the customer base has continuously expanded since I started playing in 2007. I base this on the average number of logins i used to see in 2007 compared with now. The retention of those who last more than a few months is also high, as I looked up a loss mail from 2008 that had 37 people on the mail and of that 30 had updated portraits which means they've played in at least the last two years (can't remember exactly when the avatars changed).
The fact that EVE is still going after 10 years in an era where telling an investor that you want to make an MMO will immediately require you to talk them down off their window ledge speaks volumes. Most MMOs are dead or dying or switching to free-to-play (or two of three, you can't be simultaneously dead and dying) inside of a year. A lot of this probably has to do with the fact that EVE occupies a niche in the gaming community that as far as I am aware is not filled by anyone else but that is irrelevant. Who else has a brutal, cut-throat sandbox with a storyline almost completely dictated by the players all taking place in space where you can practically watch another version of human history unfold at high speed. No one as far as I know.
Yes, EVE loses a lot of subscriptions but this is likely due to design as with the way the game is made I don't think it could support having 11 million subscriptions without fracturing the servers and a big part of the goal here was to have everyone on a single server. Commercial success is all a matter of meeting your targets and as CCP soldiers on with an ever expanding subscriber base and meeting their game design targets it can not be labelled a failure. The reality is that EVE is harsh, most are weeded out quickly and many do not make the cut. If that is you be glad it didn't take you too too long to find that out.
WoW is the only Subscription MMO on the market that I know of that has more Subscriptions than EVE does at the moment. SWOTOR (even being F2P), dropped below 500k making the range from 500k to 9 million (WoW) wide open.
Just for comparison's sake. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |
Ktorn Sinus
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
5
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 10:57:00 -
[150] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Teckos Pech wrote:Yes, and is a hardcore PvP game. GTFO. Darkfall : Unholy Wars is more of a hardcore PvP game than EVE Online is now. So don't use words like "hardcore pvp" when EVE has non-PVP zones now, you can't evade or kill concord any more, and most of the players in most of the game space are NOT pvping. EVE Online is a space mining, industry and trading game that *occasionally* has pvp. Don't pretend otherwise, because it is simply not true. If you want a real pvp game, go get one. I say this in the full knowledge that I love mining and making things :)
why are you talking about pvp when you never pvped?
wait, you actually did, 3 times, right?
n++[ 2013.07.17 12:18:19 ] Lady Flute > I haven't pvped mroe than 3 times in 7 years
also, i think i'm gonna waste my time and follow you and your m8s wherever you go and whatever you do to make ur lifes miserable until you quit forever.
THAT'S MY NEW MISSION.
THAT'S HOW I ENJOY EVE ONLINE. |
|
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 11:30:00 -
[151] - Quote
Ktorn Sinus wrote:Grace Ishukone wrote:Teckos Pech wrote:Yes, and is a hardcore PvP game. GTFO. Darkfall : Unholy Wars is more of a hardcore PvP game than EVE Online is now. So don't use words like "hardcore pvp" when EVE has non-PVP zones now, you can't evade or kill concord any more, and most of the players in most of the game space are NOT pvping. EVE Online is a space mining, industry and trading game that *occasionally* has pvp. Don't pretend otherwise, because it is simply not true. If you want a real pvp game, go get one. I say this in the full knowledge that I love mining and making things :) why are you talking about pvp when you never pvped? wait, you actually did, 3 times, right? n++[ 2013.07.17 12:18:19 ] Lady Flute > I haven't pvped mroe than 3 times in 7 years also, i think i'm gonna waste my time and follow you and your m8s wherever you go and whatever you do to make your lifes miserable until you quit forever. THAT'S MY NEW MISSION. THAT'S HOW I ENJOY EVE ONLINE. you gonna cry about it more now noob?
Interesting, you are talking about stalking this player until he leaves the game, suggest you read the EULA, so I will quote it to keep it in thread. If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
Rune Scorpio
Xion Limited Primal Force
22
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 12:33:00 -
[152] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Grace Ishukone wrote:Title says it all.
Sick of Pandemic Leigon and other nullsec mega-rich alliances cynoing into lowsec, killing every tower on every moon vaguely worth anything, and having 0 effective risk at all. Even with 16 hardneres is takes less than 10 minutes for a PL fleet to kill a large tower from reinforced, meaning that even if someone else wants to jump in to pvp them, the cap fleet has arrived, killed the tower, and left before anyone can actually pvp them.
This is meant to be a game. There is no fun in "no way to kill them" fights.
So one or more of the changes below are needed - which are useful / not?
1. Only 6 capitals, maximum, in space in any lowsec system. 2. Lowsec POS get 500% bonus defence to attacks by capitals. 3. Carriers and Dreads in LOWSEC can be warp jammed by anything. 4. POS guns get upgraded radically so they can actually HURT capitals. 5. Only two ships able to jump to one cyno each minute. 6. Ships jumping into lowsec cannot jump out until their combat timers have ended.
The idea of the above is to actually have well, pvp. Currently the game is whoever has the most isk (i.e. credit card ability) just wins. That's rubbish. Need actual pvp over static objects, not capital blat fleets that have no effective risk.
PvP is meant to be risk vs reward, fun from succeeding and achieving objectives and surviving the risks. It's not happening - much of pvp in EVE is horribly boring, and rightly slammed by players who like more than spreadsheets for their gameplay.
Actually the real issue is POS guns doing lol dmg. A single non siege Dread can easily tank a large pos full of guns/missile batteries with no much trouble, drop a couple dreads and carriers and it's cake party. The real solution is to make those batteries hit really really hard as they should but give them capital guns tracking and explosion radius, eventually add a siege upgrade so small/medium guns have a huge dps increase but can't hit anything smaller than a 500m sign radius. Killing the pos shouldn't be the hard work to do, right now it's like every single structure in this game, a matter of numbers and afk shooting until you're told to stop while watching some film. The real hard work to do should be killing the POS guns and by hard I mean that if you want to take a POS down you should be really motivated and have a strategies to kill pos guns, bring more capitals or even supers to the field, put them at risk and bring more capital/super fights, force them to fight and put those assets at risk. Right now all you need to be afk safe shooting a pos is as easy as warp your BS fleet at 150 from POS and snipe all modules with 0 risk or Drop a couple Dreads on top of the POS which is stupid, boring and brings nothing constructive or amazing as game play.
Not really crappy damage tbh. We had a large minmatar covered in guns and 6 pos gunners nearly tear apart a broken toys dread in under a minute. He wasnt seiged so he warped before I could unlock the guns in that crappy ui and burn out to him. And he had 2 archons repping him. Mind you this was broken toys. They were bads. Never seen a pos take on a proper cap fleet. |
Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1593
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 14:16:00 -
[153] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Interesting, you are talking about stalking this player until he leaves the game, suggest you read the EULA, so I will quote it to keep it in thread.
I suggest you read the EULA, and get it through your thick head that following/stalking people in EVE is just one of the many natures of this here beast; There is also nothing wrong with getting people to quit as 'harassment' is loosely defined in a game where it's perfectly legit to violence and/or steal all the things.
Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
141
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 15:00:00 -
[154] - Quote
Rune Scorpio wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Grace Ishukone wrote:Title says it all.
Sick of Pandemic Leigon and other nullsec mega-rich alliances cynoing into lowsec, killing every tower on every moon vaguely worth anything, and having 0 effective risk at all. Even with 16 hardneres is takes less than 10 minutes for a PL fleet to kill a large tower from reinforced, meaning that even if someone else wants to jump in to pvp them, the cap fleet has arrived, killed the tower, and left before anyone can actually pvp them.
This is meant to be a game. There is no fun in "no way to kill them" fights.
So one or more of the changes below are needed - which are useful / not?
1. Only 6 capitals, maximum, in space in any lowsec system. 2. Lowsec POS get 500% bonus defence to attacks by capitals. 3. Carriers and Dreads in LOWSEC can be warp jammed by anything. 4. POS guns get upgraded radically so they can actually HURT capitals. 5. Only two ships able to jump to one cyno each minute. 6. Ships jumping into lowsec cannot jump out until their combat timers have ended.
The idea of the above is to actually have well, pvp. Currently the game is whoever has the most isk (i.e. credit card ability) just wins. That's rubbish. Need actual pvp over static objects, not capital blat fleets that have no effective risk.
PvP is meant to be risk vs reward, fun from succeeding and achieving objectives and surviving the risks. It's not happening - much of pvp in EVE is horribly boring, and rightly slammed by players who like more than spreadsheets for their gameplay.
Actually the real issue is POS guns doing lol dmg. A single non siege Dread can easily tank a large pos full of guns/missile batteries with no much trouble, drop a couple dreads and carriers and it's cake party. The real solution is to make those batteries hit really really hard as they should but give them capital guns tracking and explosion radius, eventually add a siege upgrade so small/medium guns have a huge dps increase but can't hit anything smaller than a 500m sign radius. Killing the pos shouldn't be the hard work to do, right now it's like every single structure in this game, a matter of numbers and afk shooting until you're told to stop while watching some film. The real hard work to do should be killing the POS guns and by hard I mean that if you want to take a POS down you should be really motivated and have a strategies to kill pos guns, bring more capitals or even supers to the field, put them at risk and bring more capital/super fights, force them to fight and put those assets at risk. Right now all you need to be afk safe shooting a pos is as easy as warp your BS fleet at 150 from POS and snipe all modules with 0 risk or Drop a couple Dreads on top of the POS which is stupid, boring and brings nothing constructive or amazing as game play. Not really crappy damage tbh. We had a large minmatar covered in guns and 6 pos gunners nearly tear apart a broken toys dread in under a minute. He wasnt seiged so he warped before I could unlock the guns in that crappy ui and burn out to him. And he had 2 archons repping him. Mind you this was broken toys. They were bads. Never seen a pos take on a proper cap fleet. well, not really an example, knowing the BT, this dread was probably but naked or shield tanked
|
seth Hendar
I love you miners
141
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 15:10:00 -
[155] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Ktorn Sinus wrote:Grace Ishukone wrote:Teckos Pech wrote:Yes, and is a hardcore PvP game. GTFO. Darkfall : Unholy Wars is more of a hardcore PvP game than EVE Online is now. So don't use words like "hardcore pvp" when EVE has non-PVP zones now, you can't evade or kill concord any more, and most of the players in most of the game space are NOT pvping. EVE Online is a space mining, industry and trading game that *occasionally* has pvp. Don't pretend otherwise, because it is simply not true. If you want a real pvp game, go get one. I say this in the full knowledge that I love mining and making things :) why are you talking about pvp when you never pvped? wait, you actually did, 3 times, right? n++[ 2013.07.17 12:18:19 ] Lady Flute > I haven't pvped mroe than 3 times in 7 years also, i think i'm gonna waste my time and follow you and your m8s wherever you go and whatever you do to make your lifes miserable until you quit forever. THAT'S MY NEW MISSION. THAT'S HOW I ENJOY EVE ONLINE. you gonna cry about it more now noob? Interesting, you are talking about stalking this player until he leaves the game, suggest you read the EULA, so I will quote it to keep it in thread. this is what happen in every war, whether a wardec is on or not, if i have targets, whether invading my home or that i want to destroy, damn yes i'll make their life miserable, stalking them, hunting them, attempt to kill them on sight on any possible occasion. and this can go for month, until they leave the area or stop harrassing our pve boys / miners.
and the goal is to weaken the ennemy, kill his moral, prevent him to enjoy the game etc..... the more player got annoyed, the less they connect, and more their CEO start considering messing with us.
and this is valid tactic, there is many way to win a war, and when you are the underdog, a frontal fight is not in your favor, so other means are required, and there is nothing wrong with this at all, the game even push toward this! |
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
985
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 15:43:00 -
[156] - Quote
seth Hendar wrote:and the goal is to weaken the ennemy, kill his moral, prevent him to enjoy the game etc..... the more player got annoyed, the less they connect, and more their CEO start considering messing with us.
and this is valid tactic, there is many way to win a war, and when you are the underdog, a frontal fight is not in your favor, so other means are required, and there is nothing wrong with this at all, the game even push toward this!
Having a couple of hics in system with cynos fitted and contacts with their worst enemy also helps a bit and worth of every single ship you'll loose to make them loose billions and billions of assets.
Afterwards those tend to move only when it's really worth of and stop bullying the weak just because they can.
You know, like some Titans or Snowflake supers stupidly dyeing for being idiots, last times this happened those might have learned the lesson the very very hard isk/assets way and I tend to believe they're not chestbeating about it. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 15:58:00 -
[157] - Quote
seth Hendar wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Ktorn Sinus wrote:Grace Ishukone wrote:Teckos Pech wrote:Yes, and is a hardcore PvP game. GTFO. Darkfall : Unholy Wars is more of a hardcore PvP game than EVE Online is now. So don't use words like "hardcore pvp" when EVE has non-PVP zones now, you can't evade or kill concord any more, and most of the players in most of the game space are NOT pvping. EVE Online is a space mining, industry and trading game that *occasionally* has pvp. Don't pretend otherwise, because it is simply not true. If you want a real pvp game, go get one. I say this in the full knowledge that I love mining and making things :) why are you talking about pvp when you never pvped? wait, you actually did, 3 times, right? n++[ 2013.07.17 12:18:19 ] Lady Flute > I haven't pvped mroe than 3 times in 7 years also, i think i'm gonna waste my time and follow you and your m8s wherever you go and whatever you do to make your lifes miserable until you quit forever. THAT'S MY NEW MISSION. THAT'S HOW I ENJOY EVE ONLINE. you gonna cry about it more now noob? Interesting, you are talking about stalking this player until he leaves the game, suggest you read the EULA, so I will quote it to keep it in thread. this is what happen in every war, whether a wardec is on or not, if i have targets, whether invading my home or that i want to destroy, damn yes i'll make their life miserable, stalking them, hunting them, attempt to kill them on sight on any possible occasion. and this can go for month, until they leave the area or stop harrassing our pve boys / miners. and the goal is to weaken the ennemy, kill his moral, prevent him to enjoy the game etc..... the more player got annoyed, the less they connect, and more their CEO start considering messing with us. and this is valid tactic, there is many way to win a war, and when you are the underdog, a frontal fight is not in your favor, so other means are required, and there is nothing wrong with this at all, the game even push toward this!
Your definition I am OK with:
"until they leave the area or stop harrassing our pve boys / miners"
This is an issue:
"also, i think i'm gonna waste my time and follow you and your m8s wherever you go and whatever you do to make your lifes miserable until you quit forever." If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 15:59:00 -
[158] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Interesting, you are talking about stalking this player until he leaves the game, suggest you read the EULA, so I will quote it to keep it in thread. I suggest you read the EULA, and get it through your thick head that following/stalking people in EVE is just one of the many natures of this here beast; There is also nothing wrong with getting people to quit as 'harassment' is loosely defined in a game where it's perfectly legit to violence and/or steal all the things.
I ttought you were an idiot in the Marmite thread, but you just excelled yourself in this one, how the hell did you get in PL, oh I know you have a Super... If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
ConranAntoni
Empyrean Warriors Insidious Empire
72
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 16:09:00 -
[159] - Quote
This threads hilarious, it's like a beam of concerntrated retardation. |
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
985
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 16:10:00 -
[160] - Quote
ConranAntoni wrote:This threads hilarious, it's like a beam of concerntrated retardation.
Welcome fella. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |
|
Fallen Angel III
Empyrean Warriors Insidious Empire
9
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 16:12:00 -
[161] - Quote
Retards..............................................RETARDS EVERY WHERE \o/ |
Dirk Action
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
119
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 17:39:00 -
[162] - Quote
I like how this noname pubbie is trying to come at Xolve like he's somebody
lol |
Kat Ayclism
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
13
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 17:45:00 -
[163] - Quote
Dirk Action wrote:I like how this noname pubbie is trying to come at Xolve like he's somebody
lol Oi, who tha feck are ye? I'll wap you in yer gobber m8 |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:53:00 -
[164] - Quote
Dirk Action wrote:I like how this noname pubbie is trying to come at Xolve like he's somebody
lol
I find it funny being called a pubbie by a toon younger than me who has about the same number of kills that I have on this toon, if I am a pubbie what does that make you? You were in Test, hmmmm interesting did Test pay for your super and then you moved on, nah just pulling your leg.
Anyway its been fun having a verbal sparring match with PL, I was hoping to get one of you to come off after me, as it would give me some fun, but your members are only interested in a player who has 3 PvP experiences, thankfully I wil soon be off to 0.0 and you lot roam there so I hope to have some fun showing you just how much of a pubbie I am. I will see you in space, signing off from this thread.
PS To the Insidious Empire posters, sucking up to PL is not going to help you against -DD-, show some pride...
If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space, its as simple as that!-á-á-á-á-á-á-á There are people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local, well they should light a cyno and try jumping to it. |
Kat Ayclism
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 00:15:00 -
[165] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:thankfully I wil soon be off to 0.0 .. Oh man, off to brave the wilds of the Oh-OH, you got brass ones son. Brass ones!
As you've heard, we're all so bored and scared of Oh-OH that we're moving back to lowsec so my hat is off to you brave warrior. |
Lugia3
Pirates Incorporated
469
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 06:45:00 -
[166] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:TehCloud wrote:Oh boy OP, you so silly. CCP already posted a solution to all your problems a long time ago, can't you even use the search function? The solution is: here No, CCP is working on a better solution. It's called World of Darkness, where there is perma death. But also the promise of much more meaningful gameplay, much richer social complexity, and wonderful clothing if their Carbon engine lives up to the old demos. In all honesty, the "harden up or quit" idea is not working - 10 years on, EVE is alive but hardly booming, despite massive and sustained marketing efforts. EVE itself is being progressively dumbed down - just look at Odyssey. You don't need to scan down miners in belts any more, gee that makes the game require more skill! And taking the combat ships out of data sites ... YAY that made it ... oh wait. Themepark 101 designers seem to have taken over EVE. So I may as well advocate for themepark changes that support my playstyle. And when WoD launches? Set long skill training, unsub EVE. If the new game lives up to its potential, and with CCP designing it I honestly believe it will, then EVE will quietly slip back into being nothing more than a curiosity game for accountants in space, with the design and advertising effort going into the new game that could actually make CCP a great deal of money. Yes, money ... not isk.
Yes, because all us space pirates want to go play dress-up with vampires. Yarr |
Whitehound
1557
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 09:30:00 -
[167] - Quote
Lugia3 wrote:Yes, because all us space pirates want to go play dress-up with vampires. Is it Halloween yet?! Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
15244
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 10:25:00 -
[168] - Quote
Just wanted to add to the shiptoasting.
Carry on.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |
Whitehound
1557
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 10:56:00 -
[169] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Just wanted to add to the shiptoasting. Carry on. That you did.
I have my doubts that yet another discussion on cyno mechanics (or whatever) is better than watching PL troll or as someone else called it "a beam of concentrated retardation".
Not everyone believes that it should be this easy to blob each other, but rather believes in good fights. When large entities have to blob small ones is it not because they fear them or because they hate good fights, but because they will likely only trigger batphones when they come in too small numbers.
Adding complexity to cyno mechanics will surely change something, but I kinda like to see both sides suffer first, not only one, and watching PL troll on the forums can only be a sign of desperation of some sort. So that is a good thing, isn't it? Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
28
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 11:08:00 -
[170] - Quote
Kat Ayclism wrote:[quote=Dracvlad]As you've heard, we're all so bored and scared of Oh-OH that we're moving back to lowsec so my hat is off to you brave warrior.
Confirmed. Pandemic Legion pilots were in low today whining about why thier pos was being reinforced by a bunch of no-name ants who didn't even bring a tank for PL to hotdrop.
Guess the weekend wasn't nearly fun enough to be in nullsec huh?
Oh, not even kidding. Given the comments above, find the PL pos nearest to you, and reinforce it. After all, they seem bored. They have nothing better to do than to troll all day on the forums,
So please. Show that you care. Take the time to reinforce a Pandemic POS near you.
And if you kind of like PL., the reinforce the POS of the people they are arguing with ... TEST? I happily admit I have no idea who most of the people in this thread really are, or what they are meant to have done. They are not any of the nice peope who give mining buffs to me when I mine in highsec, I don't recognize them as trolls from Amarr or Jita (shoult out to Spaceship Barbie who adds life to the game), and I don't see any names from the blueprints sellers I buy from. So to me they really are a bunch of nobodies, because the Highsec game is where nearly everyone who pays for this game plays. If they didn't make the in-game billboard, then I assume they are really no-bodies anyway. So yes, take the time to reinforce a PL POS near you tomorrow, to show you care. |
|
Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
28
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 11:15:00 -
[171] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Faction warfare and Dust mercs should play a part in cyno jamming low sec systems.
This is actually a very VERY clever idea. But how would you implement that in game mechanic terms? |
PopeUrban
El Expedicion
19
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 11:29:00 -
[172] - Quote
There is one idea in this entire clusterfuck of a thread I like.
That ides is the ability to anchor SOV-less cyno jammers in low and NPC null.
If for no other reason than it gives pirates a fun and exciting new activity (hot-anchoring to trap JFs. How long can YOU point a JF?)
Some enterprising alliances could even set up a tidy toll system, and the entire idea would force null alliances to react to and play in systems outside their own sov.
Not good enough for ya? Here's an alternate idea:
Capital class cyno-Interdictors. You can discuss that I guess.
The rest of it is a whole heap of whining versus **** waving versus reason. |
Tupac'alive'in Serbia
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 14:30:00 -
[173] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Kat Ayclism wrote:[quote=Dracvlad]As you've heard, we're all so bored and scared of Oh-OH that we're moving back to lowsec so my hat is off to you brave warrior. Confirmed. Pandemic Legion pilots were in low today whining about why thier pos was being reinforced by a bunch of no-name ants who didn't even bring a tank for PL to hotdrop. Guess the weekend wasn't nearly fun enough to be in nullsec huh? Oh, not even kidding. Given the comments above, find the PL pos nearest to you, and reinforce it. After all, they seem bored. They have nothing better to do than to troll all day on the forums, So please. Show that you care. Take the time to reinforce a Pandemic POS near you. And if you kind of like PL., the reinforce the POS of the people they are arguing with ... TEST? I happily admit I have no idea who most of the people in this thread really are, or what they are meant to have done. They are not any of the nice peope who give mining buffs to me when I mine in highsec, I don't recognize them as trolls from Amarr or Jita (shoult out to Spaceship Barbie who adds life to the game), and I don't see any names from the blueprints sellers I buy from. So to me they really are a bunch of nobodies, because the Highsec game is where nearly everyone who pays for this game plays. If they didn't make the in-game billboard, then I assume they are really no-bodies anyway. So yes, take the time to reinforce a PL POS near you tomorrow, to show you care.
"p-please everyone start reinforcing Pandemic towers because I can't do it myself :cry: :tear: :smith: also when you do take all their towers c-can I have mine back maybe??" |
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
15244
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 14:33:00 -
[174] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Mag's wrote:Just wanted to add to the shiptoasting. Carry on. That you did. But not before you. This makes me a sad panda.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |
Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 15:07:00 -
[175] - Quote
Darkfall makes EVE look like a skilless snorefest that is filled with blithering idiots. Only EVE players would claim that EVE requires much skill or intelligence. EVE to me is like the place where those PVPers go who have gotten **** on in more skill demanding PVP games. Its like the league of legends of mmorpgs. I'm not even interested at all in the PVP in EVE and I consider myself an avid pvper. Its just so brainless and is based more on the luck of being in the right ship than player skill. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|
Whitehound
1560
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 17:26:00 -
[176] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Whitehound wrote:Mag's wrote:Just wanted to add to the shiptoasting. Carry on. That you did. But not before you. This makes me a sad panda. You cannot always win. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |
Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1593
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 00:09:00 -
[177] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:I ttought you were an idiot in the Marmite thread, but you just excelled yourself in this one, how the hell did you get in PL, oh I know you have a Super...
You're free to think whatever you wish mate.
Dracvlad wrote:I find it funny being called a pubbie by a toon slightly younger than me who has about the same number of kills that I have on this toon, but the majority of your kills over the last two months, if I am a pubbie what does that make you? You were in Test, hmmmm interesting did Test pay for your super and then you moved on, nah just pulling your leg.
It never ceases to amaze me how much mad is caused by the uttering of a single word.
Dracvlad is a pubbie, with a pubbie name, in a pubbie corp; no doubt full of pubbies. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Dirk Action
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
119
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 05:27:00 -
[178] - Quote
tell me more about not knowing that regular capitals can be tackled in lowsec by anything with a point :allears: |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
144
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 08:23:00 -
[179] - Quote
[quote=Dracvlad Your definition I am OK with:
"until they leave the area or stop harrassing our pve boys / miners"
This is an issue:
"also, i think i'm gonna waste my time and follow you and your m8s wherever you go and whatever you do to make your lifes miserable until you quit forever."[/quote]
if he quit eve, you win, nothing wrong here either, currently doing the same to a toon who tried to rob our corp, and trust me that the second one of his char log in, we are on his back, wherever he is in eve.
so hard that he actually cancelled all mining operation, and sold his JF (probably to keep him afloat), but he made a mistake and sold it for 7m isk (yes, we ARE still laughing at this, 3 month later, especially since he bought it with plex in the frist place ^^) |
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction
444
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 10:36:00 -
[180] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Faction warfare and Dust mercs should play a part in cyno jamming low sec systems. This is actually a very VERY clever idea. But how would you implement that in game mechanic terms?
Its not good. BEcause null sec fleets need to pass trough low sec. IF some mechanic allows peopel to control low sec cyno jamming, then the only result wil be nulls ec entities forcefully controlling low sec and destroying all the gameplay that low sec peopel like |
|
EdFromHumanResources
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
176
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 10:56:00 -
[181] - Quote
Oh man what a thread. Never stop typing angry blocks of text lowsec duders. |
Abyss Azizora
Sarum Prime Syndicate Group Paper Alliance
45
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 12:08:00 -
[182] - Quote
*Removed*
Damn forum screwed up yet again, removing 90% of what I typed. Saved none of it. |
Sean Parisi
Fugutive Task Force A T O N E M E N T
331
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 12:41:00 -
[183] - Quote
To be honest, I just think that POS towers should be able to point Super Caps if they have warp disruption modules on them. Lets be honest, a tower the size of a cruiser made solely for pointing cannot interdict a super capital? Yet a destroyer hull can?
Other then that I strongly feel the whine is strong in you. |
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
2437
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 13:01:00 -
[184] - Quote
Interesting thread.... I think it helps point out the problem with Nullsec's Sov System.
The reality is, Sov Warfare is currently center around shooting 100m EHP structures at alarm clocks. This makes for some large 4000 man fights every once in a while, but it also means the big fish eat all the smaller fish until there is only big fish left.
There really should be a "drawback" to owning unused space (not an isk-related cost).
I once proposed a Sov Index = (Military Index + Industrial index for all systems in a region) / 2x Number of systems you won in that region. Round down. And the number is how many RF timers you get on your IHUB/Stations for every system in that region.
If you own a bunch of systems you don't utilize, you'll have 0 RF timers, meaning anyone can come in and take your stations, destroy your IHUBs and TCU's, etc... in any system within that region.
The goal is, use it and it becomes easier to defend... don't use it, and it becomes easier to lose.
Note: This is imperfect, as it is fairly easy to disrupt ratting and mining in nullsec. However I think this is a change in the right direction!
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |