Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kat Ayclism
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
13
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:05:00 -
[151] - Quote
dexington wrote:you are the one saying no laws was broken, who is it exactly who is being the e-lawyery... look in the mirror... Innocent til proven guilty dawg
Also, tell me how saying the issue is more complicated than you morons having some vague feeling that it's illegal saying that no laws were broken? Go on, I will wait for you. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
481
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:06:00 -
[152] - Quote
iskflakes wrote:The white-knight space lawyers are out in force today.
The titan pilot posts his EVE API on a 3rd party website designed specifically for displaying API information publicly.
And with passwords.
"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

dexington
Dexington Corporation
707
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:10:00 -
[153] - Quote
Kat Ayclism wrote:dexington wrote:you are the one saying no laws was broken, who is it exactly who is being the e-lawyery... look in the mirror... Innocent til proven guilty dawg
I live in Africa, are you talk in about the slave drivers laws? I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |

Murk Paradox
Red Tsunami The Cursed Few
434
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:12:00 -
[154] - Quote
Kat Ayclism wrote:Murk Paradox wrote:Kat Ayclism wrote:Ace Uoweme wrote: If it's hidden behind a password it isn't public, even if the player used a simple password, as the INTENT was to keep it out of sight.
If only it wasn't posted on a public board.... something something not a reasonable expectation of privacy *vaguely legal related words* -9 billion einsteinbrainszzzzz... Unfortunately, if I were to post my SSN, that would not give you permission to acquire it by trying all the door handles to my house and reading it from the card inside that same house. Sine he was able to kill the titan through legit ways, grats to him on his hunt. Unfortunately, he TRIED to do it through nefarious ways, so boo to that. Good thing that this is totes comparable to an SSN, the keys to your car, etc.. To be clear, I would download *your* car and vigorously stick my keys into it repeatedly and with reckless abandon while blaring your SSN over my sickass sound system wit da bass drops all up in that.
So you condone illegal activities. That sucks =(
To be clear, a player did something that he should not have.
To be clear, he quite succinctly said he did.
To be clear, he said he didn't even need the information he did access.
You know, to be clear. "Never rub another man's rhubarb." -Joker in Batman (Jack Nicholson) Just get a catalyst, blow him up and the post in local "Just a friendly reminder that I'm mining here and not you." -Abrazzar
|

Murk Paradox
Red Tsunami The Cursed Few
434
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:14:00 -
[155] - Quote
iskflakes wrote:The white-knight space lawyers are out in force today.
The titan pilot posts his EVE API on a 3rd party website designed specifically for displaying API information publicly. He then uses 1234 as a password, and THEN posts that password on a public site. At this point EVERYBODY IN THE WHOLE WORLD goes apeshit because one person decided to view this eveboard.
Anyway, you're all so mad about eveboard that you've forgotten to be mad about ISBOXER. I suggest you all go and make an ISBOXER thread, despite the fact that both ISBOXER and eveboard were just bling on this kill. The titan was doomed the moment he thought that "safe logoff" didn't apply to him -- if Rocket didn't get him, somebody else would have.
As always, good job Rocket.
Well, if you claim to have broken the law, I'm going to treat you like the piece of **** criminal you are bragging to be. "Never rub another man's rhubarb." -Joker in Batman (Jack Nicholson) Just get a catalyst, blow him up and the post in local "Just a friendly reminder that I'm mining here and not you." -Abrazzar
|

Murk Paradox
Red Tsunami The Cursed Few
434
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:16:00 -
[156] - Quote
Kat Ayclism wrote:dexington wrote:you are the one saying no laws was broken, who is it exactly who is being the e-lawyery... look in the mirror... Innocent til proven guilty dawg Also, tell me how saying the issue is more complicated than you morons having some vague feeling that it's illegal saying that no laws were broken? Go on, I will wait for you.
You are aware Rocket said he did it right? "Never rub another man's rhubarb." -Joker in Batman (Jack Nicholson) Just get a catalyst, blow him up and the post in local "Just a friendly reminder that I'm mining here and not you." -Abrazzar
|

Jorden Ishonen
Kinetic Technologies
70
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:16:00 -
[157] - Quote
Kat Ayclism wrote:HE'S ALREADY IN JAIL FOR HIS DASTARDLY DEEDS, HAVE SOME RESPECT YOU GODAWFUL PEOPLE
#freerocket
It's those damned cyber police
(they're so hot right now) |

Kat Ayclism
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
13
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:17:00 -
[158] - Quote
Murk Paradox wrote:So you condone illegal activities. That sucks =(
To be clear, a player did something that he should not have.
To be clear, he quite succinctly said he did.
To be clear, he said he didn't even need the information he did access.
You know, to be clear. To be clear, someone drove a forklift up your rearend.
To be clear, your familiarity with any country's law, let alone many countries' and on varying legal specialties, is fuckall and you're now talking through the resulting gaping wound.
To be clear, I downloaded the keys to that forklift, stuck them in til one worked, and am now inserting large numeric art sculptures back into the afforementioned gaping void in a series quite similar to your SSN.
Just ~bein' clear~ |

Zaxix
Long Jump.
179
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:24:00 -
[159] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪand the other issue is one of assumed and implied consent. There are plenty of situations where the continued use could be reasonably assumed.
There are also numerous examples where access has been given once, and then been turned into effective ownership because the details of the initial verbal agreement can't be established. You're confusing several different legal principles, and you've also confused civil and criminal procedure.
As an example for the car analogy, California makes the criminal aspect expressly clear: http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d04/vc10851.htm. But we're not talking about cars.
To return to the matter at hand, if the person gave their password for the purpose of a background check for PL, then that is what he authorized -- a background check -- not continued monitoring or any other purpose. Here's a law blog article that explains some of the issues, I'm sure you can find other sources that delve into the legalese as well: http://massfamilylawblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/unathorized-access-to-email-results-in.html.
The key point from that article is: "Based on jury verdict, it appears that a use exceeding authorization constitutes an unathorized use under the statute. Furthermore, the context can establish the scope of permission. In this case, permission was granted to access an email account for performing work and obtaining information necessary for performing a job function. When the account was accessed four years later, the purpose was to obtain information to harm the owner of the email account and the employer. This was not a proper purpose.
Unless there is a written document establishing the scope of authorization for another's email account, the scope of any authorization should be limited to access for the benefit of the account holder. Any intentional access to obtain information to the detriment of the account holder should be considered unauthorized."
Location of the server doesn't matter, because the crime is access not trespass (which is what most of you are confusing it with, probably based on stories about hacking into a system).
Was the titan owner stupid? Most definitely. Is it likely this will ever see the inside of a courtroom? No. Could lawyers endlessly debate the minutiae of this particular case? You bet! That's what court cases are for, isn't it? ***Prodigal Frog***
|

Kat Ayclism
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
13
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:34:00 -
[160] - Quote
Zaxix wrote: Any intentional access to obtain information to the detriment of the account holder should be considered unauthorized."
I'm no big city lawyer but I believe you just soiled yer britches.
Man let's go comparing this to all kindsa ****, rather than facing the reality that we lack social skills and need to find a healthy hobby that doesn't permanently alienate us from people that might otherwise enjoy our company if only we'd step from the dark corners of our dingy, cheeto-hazed, redbull-can-filled, vaugely sperm-smelling rooms from which we wile away the hours furiously slapping out long diatribes about internet space pixels and the surrounding statutory and legal precedents. |
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
481
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:34:00 -
[161] - Quote
Zaxix wrote:The key point from that article is: "Based on jury verdict, it appears that a use exceeding authorization constitutes an unathorized use under the statute. Furthermore, the context can establish the scope of permission. In this case, permission was granted to access an email account for performing work and obtaining information necessary for performing a job function. When the account was accessed four years later, the purpose was to obtain information to harm the owner of the email account and the employer. This was not a proper purpose.
Unless there is a written document establishing the scope of authorization for another's email account, the scope of any authorization should be limited to access for the benefit of the account holder. Any intentional access to obtain information to the detriment of the account holder should be considered unauthorized."
And that's due to the INTENT. In law INTENT means 2/3 of the body!
A person with a key or has access to another's property, the property owner can make conditions on it's use (like a contract). If someone commits an illegal activity due to access, it was not the INTENT of the owner (like stealing from the owner) since he didn't give the key or property to everyone to do as they please, just a select few for specific reasons. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Lucius Exitius
Protectors Holdings The Tribbles
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:46:00 -
[162] - Quote
API keys are part of the game, Eveboard is an extension of the game, we use it to do background checks, if someone gives me their api key I can do with it whatever I want, give it away, use it to gather intel, etc. Eveboard is a place where you POST (There are no accounts on eveboard) your api key, you can help protect it by putting a password but since its an extension of the game its no different then guessing a POS password. If you want to make it harder for people to get your api key then put a better password on it. Ill reiterate what I said eariler and that eveboard is just an api reader its a tool and IS part of the game. So if lying, cheating, scamming, hacking passwords (unless its to get into the actual account) its all legit its in the game there for part of the universe. Maybe Chribba can put a disclaimer on his site clarifying this but its really doesn't matter since its all public information. |

gr ant
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
11
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 18:49:00 -
[163] - Quote
I like all the pseudo lawyers up in here, it's almost like you guys think something will come of this, its cute. |

Sentient Blade
Walk It Off
992
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 19:10:00 -
[164] - Quote
[quote=Lucius Exitiusbut since its an extension of the game its no different then guessing a POS password.[/quote]
This is where you're getting confused. It's related to the game, but is not an extension of it.
Just think of it this way, the rules of EVE, such as it being OK to guess a POS password, only apply when dealing with specific EVE services, specifically, those through the game client once logged in. Even then there are major restrictions, such as not trying to get access to other peoples accounts, name cloning etc.
Sooner or later a GM might pop up and make it quite clear that CCP has no control over third party services, and that their EULA and TOS has no relevance to the services they provide. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
989
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 19:22:00 -
[165] - Quote
Chribba wrote:As far as eveboard goes, that doesn't really give any details to that kill apart from when the skill ran out which sure could give a theory in what timeframe a pilot would log on to change queue. Plus they had been monitoring him for quite some time it appears.
Is it illegal, from my view no it's not illegal in that sense, but not really wanted either, but should there be a need for me to implement additional security measures to prevent brute force (than those already in place) I will do so. Guessing passwords for 60 seconds I don't think will trigger any police action (especially not in the case of eveboard, and if there had been substantial load I'm sure my monitors would have gone haywire). PS. I don't at all condone.. condole(?) or approve of this technique at all, just giving my view on how I feel about it.
If anything, I'd rather see the whole ISboxer setup being more of a grey zone in this case.
/c
+1 on this
+ players can also put other password on their Eveboard account then 0000 or 12345 and crap like that, duno how many bits PW secured Eveboard is but imho enough. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Lucius Exitius
Protectors Holdings The Tribbles
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 19:22:00 -
[166] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:[quote=Lucius Exitiusbut since its an extension of the game its no different then guessing a POS password.
This is where you're getting confused. It's related to the game, but is not an extension of it.
Just think of it this way, the rules of EVE, such as it being OK to guess a POS password, only apply when dealing with specific EVE services, specifically, those through the game client once logged in. Even then there are major restrictions, such as not trying to get access to other peoples accounts, name cloning etc.
Sooner or later a GM might pop up and make it quite clear that CCP has no control over third party services, and that their EULA and TOS has no relevance to the services they provide.[/quote]
Then how do you read the api keys in game? YOU POST YOUR API on EVEBOARD POST being the key word there. |

Sentient Blade
Walk It Off
992
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 19:27:00 -
[167] - Quote
Lucius Exitius wrote:Then how do you read the api keys in game? YOU POST YOUR API on EVEBOARD POST being the key word there.
You don't. The game itself has no method of displaying information from API keys other than with the integrated web browser, which is reliant upon services provided by third parties.*
Just because you can access it using the in game browser does not make it part of the game.
* Unless you like reading XML. |

Tron 3K
Three Thousand Industries
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 19:45:00 -
[168] - Quote
NSA already has all this info and is laughing at you for thinking your **** isn't public. |

Lucius Exitius
Protectors Holdings The Tribbles
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 19:51:00 -
[169] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:Lucius Exitius wrote:Then how do you read the api keys in game? YOU POST YOUR API on EVEBOARD POST being the key word there. You don't. The game itself has no method of displaying information from API keys other than with the integrated web browser, which is reliant upon services provided by third parties.* Just because you can access it using the in game browser does not make it part of the game. * Unless you like reading XML.
I guess you missed the part about it being a post, you post it for ALL to see, if you give your api key to someone in game with the password they can send that to whomever they want and its not illegal so there is no difference. Plus even if it was illegal, CCP won't replace his ship and no agency would even give a rats ass because its just a game and its part of a game. He scanned down where he was, logged in, and was able to catch him. He got killed by being stupid and putting his api on a public area for all to see. With what people are trying to argue, even if he didnt have a password then people would be breaking the law just looking at it, but a password being there doesnt change anything. Everyone who sells characters uses that password, ive used the password to see the post for someone who forgot to post the password in their sales post does that make me a criminal? |

Murk Paradox
Red Tsunami The Cursed Few
435
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 20:11:00 -
[170] - Quote
Kat Ayclism wrote:Murk Paradox wrote:So you condone illegal activities. That sucks =(
To be clear, a player did something that he should not have.
To be clear, he quite succinctly said he did.
To be clear, he said he didn't even need the information he did access.
You know, to be clear. To be clear, someone drove a forklift up your rearend. To be clear, your familiarity with any country's law, let alone many countries' and on varying legal specialties, is fuckall and you're now talking through the resulting gaping wound. To be clear, I downloaded the keys to that forklift, stuck them in til one worked, and am now inserting large numeric art sculptures back into the afforementioned gaping void in a series quite similar to your SSN. Just ~bein' clear~
To be clear, he said he did it.
I don't even more than 5 words to trump your pitiful attempts to troll a response. "Never rub another man's rhubarb." -Joker in Batman (Jack Nicholson) Just get a catalyst, blow him up and the post in local "Just a friendly reminder that I'm mining here and not you." -Abrazzar
|
|

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1997
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 20:11:00 -
[171] - Quote
Got linked thread.
Expected ~~internet lawyers~~
Left satisfied. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Murk Paradox
Red Tsunami The Cursed Few
435
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 20:13:00 -
[172] - Quote
Kat Ayclism wrote:Zaxix wrote: Any intentional access to obtain information to the detriment of the account holder should be considered unauthorized."
I'm no big city lawyer but I believe you just soiled yer britches. Man let's go comparing this to all kindsa ****, rather than facing the reality that we lack social skills and need to find a healthy hobby that doesn't permanently alienate us from people that might otherwise enjoy our company if only we'd step from the dark corners of our dingy, cheeto-hazed, redbull-can-filled, vaugely sperm-smelling rooms from which we wile away the hours furiously slapping out long diatribes about internet space pixels and the surrounding statutory and legal precedents.
And this was done in just 1 sentence folks! I think we have a badass amongst us. "Never rub another man's rhubarb." -Joker in Batman (Jack Nicholson) Just get a catalyst, blow him up and the post in local "Just a friendly reminder that I'm mining here and not you." -Abrazzar
|

Murk Paradox
Red Tsunami The Cursed Few
435
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 20:15:00 -
[173] - Quote
gr ant wrote:I like all the pseudo lawyers up in here, it's almost like you guys think something will come of this, its cute.
Agreed, they should go back to driving their forklifts =) "Never rub another man's rhubarb." -Joker in Batman (Jack Nicholson) Just get a catalyst, blow him up and the post in local "Just a friendly reminder that I'm mining here and not you." -Abrazzar
|

grrlet
doTheNeedful
23
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:00:00 -
[174] - Quote
The more important question is, does he even know that his TItan was killed being that he was logged off when it happened and he only logs on to skill????!!!!!!   |

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
234
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:03:00 -
[175] - Quote
No different than arm chair quarterbacks. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3010
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:06:00 -
[176] - Quote
Wow, this thread is almost 10 pages and full of internet lawyers.
Ban OP, gas thread, and nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure to get all the internet lawyers.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Alua Oresson
Demon-War-Lords Fatal Ascension
280
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:17:00 -
[177] - Quote
And here we have proof that a large majority of Eve players will happily discuss minutiae until it is well past relevance. http://pvpwannabe.blogspot.com/ |

Zaxix
Long Jump.
179
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:33:00 -
[178] - Quote
Kat Ayclism wrote:Zaxix wrote: Any intentional access to obtain information to the detriment of the account holder should be considered unauthorized."
I'm no big city lawyer but I believe you just soiled yer britches. Man let's go comparing this to all kindsa ****, rather than facing the reality that we lack social skills and need to find a healthy hobby that doesn't permanently alienate us from people that might otherwise enjoy our company if only we'd step from the dark corners of our dingy, cheeto-hazed, redbull-can-filled, vaugely sperm-smelling rooms from which we wile away the hours furiously slapping out long diatribes about internet space pixels and the surrounding statutory and legal precedents. You're quoting me, quoting the lawyer who writes that blog. The statement is his, not mine. As he is an actual lawyer and you are a cheeto-eating, redbull-drinking, Onanistic recluse, I'm going with his opinion over yours.
Alua Oresson wrote:And here we have proof that a large majority of Eve players will happily discuss minutiae until it is well past relevance. It's EVE. What did you expect? ***Prodigal Frog***
|

Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
501
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:39:00 -
[179] - Quote
This reminds me of how I guessed the password of a secure container in space once. it was "8888" or something like that. Got 10 billion worth of what was apparently a sweatshop's loot. (The guys were stashing it in containers so as to guard their assets against the inevitable bans).
Anyway, gaining access to someone elses account on a computer system might be illegal, but even so, this falls outside CCP's jurisdiction anyway. Case closed. GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3133
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 22:08:00 -
[180] - Quote
Entity wrote:This reminds me of how I guessed the password of a secure container in space once. it was "8888" or something like that. Got 10 billion worth of what was apparently a sweatshop's loot. (The guys were stashing it in containers so as to guard their assets against the inevitable bans).
Anyway, gaining access to someone elses account on a computer system might be illegal, but even so, this falls outside CCP's jurisdiction anyway. Case closed.
I think hacking a container in a game, or even corp theft for that matter all done in game, is perfectly legal.
It's when you are out of the game, at a browser or terminal, and crack into an account, that things get dicey.
But like i said before, it all depends on who you are (at least in my country). If you are with the "in" crowd you can get caught hacking phones and have your own show on CNN still or run an entire news network. If you are not in the "in crowd" or perhaps have publicly gone against it, then even the hacking of a secure container might land you in trouble. At the least, even if a judge throws it out later, the "message" is sent by the SWAT raid you get regardless of the crime or the charge.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |