Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Baldour Ngarr
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 00:29:00 -
[1]
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate has long maintained a position of neutrality towards all alliances claiming territory in 0.0. This policy has now been abandoned.
ISS declares its support for the Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate, which is contesting space in Catch with the Commonwealth Alliance. ISSN pilots have been instructed to assist IAC in defence of its assets in the area.
In galactic terms, this is a small step involving a small conflict, but it may well be the start of a trend in which ISS take actively aggressive measures against those alliances which will not allow its pilots free passage through such areas as Providence and Pure Blind. All such alliances are advised to take note.
"I tried strip mining, but I lost, and it's cold flying around in space naked." |
Righteous Fury
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 00:31:00 -
[2]
No offense ISS, I highly doubt this is going to end well for you.
|
Joshua Foiritain
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 00:36:00 -
[3]
Youre kidding right? -------------
[AUCTION] Halo Omega About to end |
Pepperami
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 00:45:00 -
[4]
lol! Kidding, right? ___________________________
Originally by: TheKiller8 anyone who disagrees with my opinion is a racist.
|
Rift lance
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 00:47:00 -
[5]
Is this the new Trade Federation ... anyone?
Star Wars 4tw
|
Dr Happy
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 00:56:00 -
[6]
You really picked a bad subject to do this
|
j0rz
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 00:56:00 -
[7]
from the passage of eve chronicles
*and so did ISS take aggressive moves towards the pilots of eve and did they fight bravley for a just cause and they perished, many would say like the xetic federation for these where foolhardy peoples*
|
TheJay
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:07:00 -
[8]
Free for all woo!
|
Liu Kaskakka
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:12:00 -
[9]
Hahahaha. GJ. ^^
King Liu is RIGHT!!
|
Raem Civrie
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:13:00 -
[10]
Yup, ISS is going to die.
Sorry mates, you just took the little nothing that was keeping you somewhat safe, and tossed it out the window. ---
God-King of Genitalia |
|
Alberta
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:14:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Raem Civrie Yup, ISS is going to die.
Sorry mates, you just took the little nothing that was keeping you somewhat safe, and tossed it out the window.
Thx for saving me some typing.
My Thoughts on Game Balance |
Dr Happy
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:14:00 -
[12]
You also decide to help an allaince that has almsot no chance of surviving in 0.0. I could go into more but I wont
|
Tyrrax Thorrk
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:14:00 -
[13]
Excellent move ISS, people who KOS everyone who enters their space need to be put down.
I don't see this as abandoning neutrality since they would shoot you anyway.
|
Dr Happy
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:17:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk Excellent move ISS, people who KOS everyone who enters their space need to be put down.
I don't see this as abandoning neutrality since they would shoot you anyway.
see you don't have all the info now do you?
do resaerch learn what actually is going on and don't take one source as the know all end all.
|
j0sephine
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:22:00 -
[15]
Edited by: j0sephine on 29/12/2005 01:22:47
"Interstellar Starbase Syndicate has long maintained a position of neutrality towards all alliances claiming territory in 0.0. This policy has now been abandoned."
... Seeing how this move puts a direct threat on ISS-controlled outpost(s), was it approved by the shareholders and thus de facto owners of structures you decided to endanger with your decision..? o.O;
|
Tyrrax Thorrk
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:22:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Tyrrax Thorrk on 29/12/2005 01:23:08
I've dealt with CCC too, I know their attitude in the area, I also know IAC's and I know how ISS operate.
I do know what I'm talking about, ISS is in the right here.
IAC unlike CCC, have no interest in closing the space, they don't shoot neutrals on sight and they don't try to blackmail people into helping them against their enemies.
|
Dr Happy
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:26:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk Edited by: Tyrrax Thorrk on 29/12/2005 01:23:08
I've dealt with CCC too, I know their attitude in the area, I also know IAC's and I know how ISS operate.
I do know what I'm talking about, ISS is in the right here.
IAC unlike CCC, have no interest in closing the space, they don't shoot neutrals on sight and they don't try to blackmail people into helping them against their enemies.
CCC Does not kos on sight they ask you to leave a few times. It is hard to Patrol anough to allow poepel in and keep pirates out so for safety reasion no one that isn't know is let in. there are a few corp allowed into ccc space like mom and pop and archo corperations
|
Rexthor Hammerfists
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:27:00 -
[18]
i fail to see this as a major change for iss, but maybe a surprise will strike.
|
Dr Happy
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:29:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Rexthor Hammerfists i fail to see this as a major change for iss, but maybe a surprise will strike.
They want to have an outpost in the area that iac is trying to take over
|
KSUDruid
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:29:00 -
[20]
Umm.. I really have no idea who these people are or any clue about them at all, but ISS declaring itself no longer neutral is just like putting your balls right in a door and then slamming it shut.
The ONE THING you guys had going for you that seperated you from the rest of the Alliances in the game you just ****ed away for what? Some travel rights through unclaimed space?
GG ISS, You had a great concept while it lasted. Welcome to the real world with the rest of us.
-Druid
|
|
Shimpu
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:30:00 -
[21]
Like in Simpsons: "Haha!"
|
Ka Dargo
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:31:00 -
[22]
WTS: ISS Shares :P
|
Berneh
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:39:00 -
[23]
Its not a major change at all really, our guys kept getting kiled and threatened in the ccc gatecamps, so we said ok np.
simple.
Image oversized please read the forum rules - Laqum Twinkle Twinkle little star , can i macro your veldspar |
ChefAce
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:41:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Ka Dargo WTS: ISS Shares :P
lol
It's not like they were ever really neutral anyway.
They're also in Syndicate hobknobing with Goonfleet and the OSS. I see this ending real well for you guys. Not!
Good luck to you but as some many before me have said, you just screwed the pooch. -------------
|
Eddie
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:42:00 -
[25]
This is gonna be so fun
|
Azuriel Talloth
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:47:00 -
[26]
Now I'm glad I was too late to buy shares in Borealis
|
Halseth Durn
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:48:00 -
[27]
Originally by: j0sephine Edited by: j0sephine on 29/12/2005 01:22:47
"Interstellar Starbase Syndicate has long maintained a position of neutrality towards all alliances claiming territory in 0.0. This policy has now been abandoned."
... Seeing how this move puts a direct threat on ISS-controlled outpost(s), was it approved by the shareholders and thus de facto owners of structures you decided to endanger with your decision..? o.O;
This important question should be answered ASAP.
|
Count TaSessine
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:50:00 -
[28]
This post is not representative of ISS. We have not abandoned the neutral stance on which the ISS Charter is built on.
The conflict between IAC and CCC is well known to us since it is ongoing in Catch. CCC is shooting at ISS, IAC is not. This does not mean we support one or the other, only that we actively defend against CCC as per the ISS Charter.
Chairman, ISS
|
El Sayal
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 01:59:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Count TaSessine This post is not representative of ISS. We have not abandoned the neutral stance on which the ISS Charter is built on.
The conflict between IAC and CCC is well known to us since it is ongoing in Catch. CCC is shooting at ISS, IAC is not. This does not mean we support one or the other, only that we actively defend against CCC as per the ISS Charter.
can i suggest that you limit who is allowed to make press releases as this last post is much better than the OP, also clears up alot of the flamebait you left yourselves open to....
Death is certain, Life isn't. |
Calisto Lockhart
|
Posted - 2005.12.29 02:01:00 -
[30]
Originally by: j0sephine Edited by: j0sephine on 29/12/2005 01:22:47
"Interstellar Starbase Syndicate has long maintained a position of neutrality towards all alliances claiming territory in 0.0. This policy has now been abandoned."
... Seeing how this move puts a direct threat on ISS-controlled outpost(s), was it approved by the shareholders and thus de facto owners of structures you decided to endanger with your decision..? o.O;
an interesting point indeed, i am sure many people would like that answer
Originally by: SengH TomB would probably use it as an excuse to develop some ridiculously overpowered weapon for the Jove mothership, then Oveur would ride it into the middle of the borg fleet and set it off |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |