Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
35
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 13:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Title says it all.
The cloaky camper issue has become so bad that there are entire constellations where most people have simply walked away. And they don't go to another constellation of nullsec, or even highsec - they have gone to War Thunder, WoW, and the Star Citizen beta.
EVE Online is being strangled by campy cloakers shutting down systems, and making it impossible to play. Add to that if you do play, you get hotdropped and killed by 5 to 10 black ops battleships, or if you have Pandemic, 2 or 3 Nyx. That would be fine, except having ganked they warp off to safes, cloak, then wait cloaked until they can get a new gank, or jump out.
There is no fight, no epic battle, just a gank then nothing more until another player undocks, gets ganked, and says screw this I'm playing a game that I can *play* not one that consists of everyone afk camping for weeks.
Solutions.
(1) Make cloaking devices require Heavy Water as fuel, which depletes at 25 per minute. Use your cloak wisely, it will run out.
(2) Make it that only Stealth Bombers can recloak while an engagement timer is active. Yes, I mean the 15 minute one. If you jump in your Nyx to gank someone, then they can scan you down and actually fight. PvP might happen, rather than gank and go.
(3) this is actually the most commonly discussed in our null alliance: we all go to Star Citizen the day it launches on the basis that the Devs have painted themselves into a gameplay corner now, such that in effect the Rogue Sneak Attack from World of Warcraft summarizes the state of 'pvp' in EVE Online, and things are simply going to go downhill from here on out for EVE. Do I ant that? No, not really. I like EVE. But I think there is a massive problem with instant alpha damage and hotdrop insta kills.
And don't get me wrong, I own two Redeemers, and mercilessly butcher people too. I just think there is neither challenge nor skill required for a lot of this game now, and the changes (1) and (2) above would improve things a lot.
And if nothing changes ... well there is always Star Citizen. Or Darkfall Unholy Wars, that has better pvp than EVE now, or at least will after the next massive balance patch. So yes CCP, shape up or watch this game wither and die.
And CSM ... do your job. The current suggestions from CCP are going down the track of increased alpha, shorter fight times. All that means is fewer players, because everyone stays in their POS / stations and logs out when you see an enemy scout, because you know the hotdrop is right behind them. With hindsight, adding instant travel was a massive mistake. But the map is so bad in EVE that it was needed ... so EVE is currently in this horrible design mess. At least the cloaking issue can be fixed by the simple and game-consistent mechanic of requiring a cloak to use fuel. That one simple change would make covert pilots need to use their brains ... and if afk all day, would lead to their deaths.
|

Grarr Dexx
Snuff Box
278
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 14:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
If you want safety, go to highsec. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
1383
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 15:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
You have no in-game right to solo farm with your blinged out whatever.
make friends, get cheap ratting/pvp fits, farm stuff together
you will:
a) likely never get dropped b) have the ability to win/break tackle/inflict damage back/have fun even if you are dropped c) lose nothing of real value even if you are dropped and obliterated
Stop playing eve like every other mindless pve grindfest, and youll be just fine Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

Alphea Abbra
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
448
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Please do explain how someone AFK is hurting you?
What you did was making a solution, then creating a problem that might apply. That's really a rubbish way of going about your daily business. In other words, please identify the actual problem, instead of stating that "everyone knows the problem" and that you can solve it. If "it" needs a solution, identify the problem "it" first.
It really is that easy. I wouldn't go "Hmm, now with these concrete roads and rubber bands and diesel moters and neat cars, I really want some humans to want to drive around in them ... !" So don't work backwards. Find the problem, then solve it.
Also, for a more practical reply you can work directly from, Varius Xeral applies too. |

wagashi
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 04:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
This thread is late it's been a whole month since the last nerf cloaking thread.
Here we go:
All covert ops ships are made of glass
Their survival depends on hitting when the opponent is not ready
Local prevents surprise attacks
sitting idle counteracts local
No you may not have risk free ratting in null
that about covers it. If you contract me your stuff I'll put it to good use. |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate Naquatech Syndicate
1232
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 07:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
Grarr Dexx wrote:If you want safety, go to highsec.
|

Titus Balls
Stay Frosty.
12
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 09:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
I love how I went away for three years, came back a few months ago and people are still complaining about this...... 
|

Baaldor
In Igne Morim Easily Excited
111
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
Titus Balls wrote:I love how I went away for three years, came back a few months ago and people are still complaining about this...... 
And still claiming that will EvE will die because of it.... |

admiral root
Red Galaxy SpaceMonkey's Alliance
612
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 18:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:The cloaky camper issue has become so bad...
What issue? No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Laserak
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
117
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:28:00 -
[10] - Quote
When the pimp's in the crib ma Drop it like it's hot Drop it like it's hot Drop it like it's hot
When the pigs try to get at ya Park it like it's hot Park it like it's hot Park it like it's hot
And if a ***** get a attitude Pop it like it's hot Pop it like it's hot Pop it like it's hot
I got the rolly on my arm and I'm pouring Chandon And I roll the best weed cause I got it going on |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1136
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:09:00 -
[11] - Quote
I love how their entire premise predicates on their absurd assertion that EVE is dying because of afk cloaking, and afk cloaking only. Gotta love the name dropping of Star Citizen too.
To the OP:
Get over it, and get over yourself. You are a coward. You don't belong in nullsec, wormhole space, lowsec, or any other kind of "lawless space", as these areas are frequently described.
Go back to highsec, and hide behind CONCORD, since other people scare you so much. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
35
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 02:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
Baaldor wrote:
And still claiming that will EvE will die because of it....
Have you seen the price of PLEX lately?
The fewer people buying PLEX off CCP, the higher the price goes. Newer players buy PLEX off CCP. Veterans just rat more.
Based on the price of PLEX, CCP is losing new players more than ever. Unless CCP gives real stats, then yes all I have to go on is falling total online, falling numbers in Amarr, and increased numbers of alliance members playing other games. Give us the real player data and fess up CCP, you know cloakers and hotdrops are hurting the game playerbase or they would not be lined up for major adjustments in the next expansion.
For those who have trouble holding large sentences:
PvP yes. Hotdrops yes. AFK cloaky camping for days, no.
Make cloaks take heavy water as fuel. 25/minute. It will run out eventually, problem solved. |

Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
35
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 02:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:.
To the OP:
Get over it, and get over yourself. You are a coward. You don't belong in nullsec, wormhole space, lowsec, or any other kind of "lawless space", as these areas are frequently described.
Go back to highsec, and hide behind CONCORD, since other people scare you so much.
So in other words, you want me to not play. Got it.
That is PRECISELY THE PROBLEM - this game is a niche game, and due to game design decisions the MAJORITY of the players who DO play are EXCLUDED from 50% of the game. Why do you think people quit EVE? And do you REALLY think new players looking for a space game are going to join EVE Online, a 10 year old game with a perception of a vile anti-new-player community, or a fresh game called Star Citizen?
Wake up, troll, and realize that you are indeed part of why EVE Online is at a critical point now. I want this game to continue to grow and deepen into the original concept. But lets get real here - if new players stop joining, and old players keep leaving, EVE Online will not 'die; as such, but it will be CCP's number three or four game in terms of design effort and marketing. They will keep it ticking over but forget about real improvements: if you want those, buy Valkyrie, Dust, or World of Darkness?
So yes, use your brain people. Not your in-game troll personas. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4820
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 04:30:00 -
[14] - Quote
eve is real. this is part of the game
the final boss of eve is eve There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Grace Ishukone
Ishukone Advanced Research
35
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:35:00 -
[15] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:eve is real. this is part of the game
the final boss of eve is eve
Then like all games before it, EVE will wither until it eventually dies. |

Baaldor
In Igne Morim Easily Excited
111
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:57:00 -
[16] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:eve is real. this is part of the game
the final boss of eve is eve Then like all games before it, EVE will wither until it eventually dies.
Well then can I have your stuff? |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
12076
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 12:13:00 -
[17] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:eve is real. this is part of the game
the final boss of eve is eve Then like all games before it, EVE will wither until it eventually dies.
yes after 10 years of growth, THIS is the year that cloaky ships will kill EVE because
1 Kings 12:11
|

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
1386
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 12:48:00 -
[18] - Quote
...because of plex Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

Sipphakta en Gravonere
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
317
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 15:17:00 -
[19] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:The fewer people buying PLEX off CCP, the higher the price goes. Newer players buy PLEX off CCP. Veterans just rat more.
I don't know about that. I think that gaining ISK has become easier than ever, so more people are able to buy PLEX. Which reduces supply and increases demand at the same time. I say tomato, you say tomaCCP BAN ALL TOMATOES THEY ARE HARASSING ME I WANT TOMATO FREE HIGHSEC. -- TheGunslinger42 |

Lykouleon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1100
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:46:00 -
[20] - Quote
Bye, have fun playing a game that won't be out for about another two years when you don't get your way in EVE: Online. Lykouleon > CYNO ME CLOSER so I can hit them with my sword |

Naj Panora
Ton Of Bricks Lokun Listamenn
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 21:50:00 -
[21] - Quote
It is not cloaky afk'er that are the problem. It's cloaky people who like me run 2-3 monitors and 2-3 accounts (for you that can't do math that's one account per screen). They can sit in a system at a belt and not really be doing anything on that screen while making their isk on another screen and when a miner or ratter shows up open a blops bridge. While not really afk the toon is effectively afk because it is not actively being played. When we talk about afk cloakers this is what we are talking about. People who are not actively playing a toon can easily gank people who are. Giving us scan probes so cloakers at least have some threat from those of us who wish to hunt them. I wish the new cyno jammer worked on covert cyno to make it a little more dangerous to use them. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1150
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 00:23:00 -
[22] - Quote
Quote:due to game design decisions the MAJORITY of the players who DO play are EXCLUDED from 50% of the game.
Oh, you definitely have some proof of that, right? I mean, especially as how EVE subscriptions are still riding close to an all time high, and all. It couldn't possibly be something you just told yourself to assuage your carebear sentiments to thinking you're part of some kind of moral majority.
Or, wait, yes, it is. Just like every other whiny carebear who comes onto these forums and tries to spout off the same lie about how X% of all players are highsec crybabies too.
Here's a shocker for you. You don't speak for a damn person in this game besides yourself. No. one. else.
And if my attitude is why you're going to go off and play Star Citizen, fine, have fun(clearly, you don't like the game in the first place). But to try and tell me "I'll quit, and all my carebear friends will quit with me because I don't get what I want" is not only wishful, delusional thinking, but the entire history of this game is one giant proof against it all. Oh, and it's supremely childish to boot.
If it mattered to the game at all that people like you quit because you don't get your way, it would have died a long time ago. Thin skinned weaklings quit this game every day, and the servers keep running, the world still turns, and time marches on.
You don't matter. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Samillian
Angry Mustellid
342
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 22:52:00 -
[23] - Quote
Time after time we get thread after thread on this subject from ISK obsessed, risk averse players that believe they are entitled to go about their farming without risk, care or precaution.
If AFK cloaking was going to kill EvE it would have done it a long time ago. Abandon your scaremongering , selfishness and your needy entitlement and try developing a backbone, you might find you actually enjoy the game rather than cowering in station. NBSI shall be the whole of the Law |

Speedkermit Damo
Demonic Retribution
113
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 16:04:00 -
[24] - Quote
Internet tough guys detected. Don't Panic.
|

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
1413
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 16:38:00 -
[25] - Quote
Speedkermit Damo wrote:Internet tough guys detected.
Betting than being an internet crybaby. Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

Speedkermit Damo
Demonic Retribution
113
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 16:51:00 -
[26] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:Speedkermit Damo wrote:Internet tough guys detected. Betting than being an internet crybaby.
Not really, as most internet tough guys usually turn out to be sad pathetic losers in real life. Don't Panic.
|

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
1413
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 17:14:00 -
[27] - Quote
Speedkermit Damo wrote:Varius Xeral wrote:Speedkermit Damo wrote:Internet tough guys detected. Betting than being an internet crybaby. Not really, as most internet tough guys usually turn out to be sad pathetic losers in real life.
And internet crybabies masculine paragons of virtue? Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Pirate Nation.
122
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 18:32:00 -
[28] - Quote
Samillian wrote:Time after time we get thread after thread on this subject from ISK obsessed, risk averse players that believe they are entitled to go about their farming without risk, care or precaution.
If AFK cloaking was going to kill EvE it would have done it a long time ago. Abandon your scaremongering , selfishness and your needy entitlement and try developing a backbone, you might find you actually enjoy the game rather than cowering in station.
AFK cloaking is not killing Eve, but it sure does not help, but before I get started on that, lets just point out that when I first went to 0.0 I went to NPC 0.0, and was operating in a contested system, therefore while a cloaky camper is annoying I can operate around them and like to kill them when they decide to get back to the KB and actually try to prove something. The key thing is of course to work out what you are facing or likely to fight, for example once in Cobalt Edge I ratted with a red Arazu cloaked up in system in my carrier, but I was with two other carriers and we were triage fit and we knew just how many they could bring in on us, of course they went elsewhere.
Most people who start in hisec and go to 0.0 do so as part of a group that rents, credit should be given to them for leaving hisec, however they often make poor strategic choices like renting a single -1.00 system, here is the rub, they go to 0.0 expecting to make ISK and have fun, instead they have an unknown risk that can drop a unknown amount of DPS on them, as they are not used to this, having worked with hisec rules of stay docked up they of course do that. Often when one tells them to make better strategic decisions about renting multiple systems, or to go out and belt rat in cheap ships they decide that level 4's are better. However at this point I give them credit for at least trying and perhaps staying in system in the vain hope that the cloaky camper will go away... If they try to stick with it they just tend to log in and then go do something else, and its this point where the danger rests, I know 6 people personally that started doing just that and then after a while said to themselves lets concentrate on the something else and left Eve. You being the tough guy that you are, are likely to ask for their stuff and go back to WOW, but CCP loses a client, who may have developed into a 0.0 F1 killing machine, sadly we shall never know.
And this young man is the issue, Eve is not dying, but it sure as hell is not growing either.
Now on a number of AFK cloaky threads I was told by the get rid of local brigade that with local being the perfect tool people did the AFK cloaky thing to have a chance to kill something, however now we have fast warping interceptors that are immune to bubbles, lets see if they are correct, my feeling is that those AFK claoky campers will still be there because most of the players who do it are just lame and are not up to screaming around in interceptors having a blast, anyway we shall see!    If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space,-áand those people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local,-álight a cyno and try jumping to it.-á-á There is a structural issue with Eve, based on accounts with no link, vast reserves of ISK-áand plex, which makes it too easy to metagame the destruction of small alliances. |

Samillian
Angry Mustellid
344
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 12:07:00 -
[29] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:And this young man is the issue
Appreciate that, its been over thirty years since anyone called me young man 
As to the rest, even if you are new to 0.0 you can at least take intelligent precautions and you should have researched more than the ISK/hr you can make from a system. If you aren't prepared to make an effort to learn about possible hazards and continue to act as if you are living in the HiSec cradle I have no sympathy. When I started out in 0.0 the corp I was with used the standing fleet and active comms system, any problems everyone else in system could warp in to help out. We baited cloaky campers so hard they stopped bothering for the most part because if they landed on one of my corp mates they knew help was inbound.
We didn't always win, sometimes we ran and sometimes we died but our default action was to do something ourselves rather than crawl to the forums and whine how we couldn't undock for three days because there was a red in local watching Netflix. It was also a hell of a lot more fun.
I am no tough guy and players leaving EvE over this type of issue saddens me, it diminishes the game. I am just very tired of people expecting CCP to alter the game to suit their revenue stream rather than adapting and engaging with the game and actually doing something for themselves. I have lost major revenue and business opportunities over the years, some through mechanics changes and some through player actions and I have never felt the need to moan about it on the forums or cried to CCP to pick me up and dust me off. I have picked myself up and got on with the job of rebuilding, the challenge drove me on.
Finally, Interceptor V is in training as we speak and I'm looking forward to the old "Sweep and Burn" intie swarm being considerably more effective than it was. I never could be bothered AFK cloaking myself, I've always preferred a more active playstyle. NBSI shall be the whole of the Law |

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Pirate Nation.
122
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 12:53:00 -
[30] - Quote
Samillian wrote:Dracvlad wrote:And this young man is the issue Appreciate that, its been over thirty years since anyone called me young man  As to the rest, even if you are new to 0.0 you can at least take intelligent precautions and you should have researched more than the ISK/hr you can make from a system. If you aren't prepared to make an effort to learn about possible hazards and continue to act as if you are living in the HiSec cradle I have no sympathy. When I started out in 0.0 the corp I was with used the standing fleet and active comms system, any problems everyone else in system could warp in to help out. We baited cloaky campers so hard they stopped bothering for the most part because if they landed on one of my corp mates they knew help was inbound. We didn't always win, sometimes we ran and sometimes we died but our default action was to do something ourselves rather than crawl to the forums and whine how we couldn't undock for three days because there was a red in local watching Netflix. It was also a hell of a lot more fun. I am no tough guy and players leaving EvE over this type of issue saddens me, it diminishes the game. I am just very tired of people expecting CCP to alter the game to suit their revenue stream rather than adapting and engaging with the game and actually doing something for themselves. I have lost major revenue and business opportunities over the years, some through mechanics changes and some through player actions and I have never felt the need to moan about it on the forums or cried to CCP to pick me up and dust me off. I have picked myself up and got on with the job of rebuilding, the challenge drove me on. Finally, Interceptor V is in training as we speak and I'm looking forward to the old "Sweep and Burn" intie swarm being considerably more effective than it was. I never could be bothered AFK cloaking myself, I've always preferred a more active playstyle.
Now you are my type of player, I admit to having a moan recently about unified accounts and the ease of meta gaming due to the lack of account linking, but that was more to do with the penny dropping that what I was intending to do was just not worth doing with that structural issue, thankfully CCP setup something that I wanted to have for a long time, the Personal structure and that has kept me in the game, I just hope that CCP do not make it too big and bulky and too easy to scan down...
I too am fed up with cloaky AFK threads, but I get more irritated by the people trying to downplay it, coming out with stupid things like he is not dangerous if AFK, its so ******** its painful because how the hell do you know that they are AFK. Like you I have operated against them and got some great kills and seen a fair few move to other systems because of the lack of joy they had with me. But the thing is that I can laregly play when I want, pity those poor people who have a limited time to play, they are on a hiding to nothing, I really can't blame them for doing Incursions and level 4's or leaving the game, I hate doing incusrions and level 4's, the only PvE I enjoy is in 0.0 because of the risk element... If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space,-áand those people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local,-álight a cyno and try jumping to it.-á-á There is a structural issue with Eve, based on accounts with no link, vast reserves of ISK-áand plex, which makes it too easy to metagame the destruction of small alliances. |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
992
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:51:00 -
[31] - Quote
Remove cloaked ships from local. Problem solved. The Tears Must Flow |

Baaldor
In Igne Morim Easily Excited
124
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:58:00 -
[32] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Remove cloaked ships from local. Problem solved.
You have all my upvotes sir.
|

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Pirate Nation.
124
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 19:23:00 -
[33] - Quote
Baaldor wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Remove cloaked ships from local. Problem solved. You have all my upvotes sir.
Talking about upvotes you have applied two there, but I notice that when you post you often have a single up vote, I wonder how that is happening, are you really that insecure that you must upvote your own posts with your other account, I noticed it on almost every inane post you have made, you sir are most amusing... If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space,-áand those people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local,-álight a cyno and try jumping to it.-á-á There is a structural issue with Eve, based on accounts with no link, vast reserves of ISK-áand plex, which makes it too easy to metagame the destruction of small alliances. |

Friggz
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
164
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 20:55:00 -
[34] - Quote
Not sure why I take the time to explain this again and again everytime this pops up. I guess I need some good karma every now and then.
People have been complaining about this for years. It hasn't changed. It won't until a large overhaul of mechanics.
To explain why we need to look at two things: Risk and reward.
Firstly, Risk.
You have a magical box called "Local" that tells you when to run and hide. It is 100% accurate, works instantly and is completely infallible. It costs you nothing to set up or maintain. All the work is done for you. All you have to do is press the dock button when it tells you to and pay some kind of minimal attention.
This creates complete safety for you. In other words, it removes risk.
Because of this, if someone wants to kill you, they have to go to great lengths. They have to dedicate an account to it and leave their computer on 24/7. No one wants to do this. They do this only because thanks to local it is the only effective way of killing you. Local is so strong that in order to counter it you need to dedicate an account and a computer 24/7 to do so. Let that sink in a minute.
What would happen if we removed afk cloaking? Even if you had a solution that didn't screw over normal cloaky fleets (and very few suggestions people make wouldn't) the main issue is you'd never die.
This is a problem because of the second thing we need to talk about, which is reward.
So, if you hate being killed and AFK cloakies are such a plague, why aren't you in high sec? The answer to that is you make more isk in null-sec. Why? Why do bounties pay more? Why are plexes more lucrative? Why do planets have more resources, why is all the best moon-goo there? Because it's riskier. You accept a greater level of risk in exchange for a greater level of reward.
The problem is, you want it both ways. You want the increased level of reward that comes with null-sec, but as soon as you are asked to assume the risk with it, you refuse. You demand CCP alter the game mechanics to ensure you never have to take a risk. To make sure your magical safety box continues to operate with 100% efficency.
Sorry but:
YOU DON'T GET TO HAVE IT BOTH WAYS
You either accept the increases risk in Null-sec, and with it the increased rewards, or you get out null-sec and surrender those rewards for increased safety. Those are your options. It's your sandbox, you pick. The Evolution of the Stealth Bomber, and the story of the first Black Ops Capital Kill in EvE.
https://truestories.eveonline.com/ideas/969 |

Black Canary Jnr
Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk Amarr branch. Sev3rance
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 00:46:00 -
[35] - Quote
Cloakies are fine atm, they get alot of kills everyday from moronic people who don't watch local or travel in shiny ships. Therefore they are balanced for me. Wouldn't mind a 'decloaking dessie' but i don't see how they can be balanced so they aren't just certain death on gate camps.
I'm more worried about these inty warp speed changes because the time they allow for you to not notice them is not very big at all.
Also screw everyone who rats in bubbled systems, i hope you lose your shiny stuff to inties. |

Baaldor
In Igne Morim Easily Excited
124
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 02:06:00 -
[36] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Baaldor wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Remove cloaked ships from local. Problem solved. You have all my upvotes sir. Talking about upvotes you have applied two there, but I notice that when you post you often have a single up vote, I wonder how that is happening, are you really that insecure that you must upvote your own posts with your other account, I noticed it on almost every inane post you have made, you sir are most amusing...
Burning my spy alts upvoting forum **** erry day.
|

Sean Apollo
Rokh You like a Hurricane Nomads.
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 04:01:00 -
[37] - Quote
I Must admit that this has crossed my mind. But really its part of the game. We play in a giant sandbox. What do you really expect? People are free to do anything they want anywhere. You either quit the game or you learn to play it. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4862
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 03:31:00 -
[38] - Quote
Sean Apollo wrote:I Must admit that this has crossed my mind. But really its part of the game. We play in a giant sandbox. What do you really expect? People are free to do anything they want anywhere. You either quit the game or you learn to play it. in the metagame you can change the way things work in game
or get special scorpions whatever There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Signal11th
DARKNESS.
1124
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 10:14:00 -
[39] - Quote
I get them from time to time, easy enough to do stuff without losing anything so I don't really see the problem. Powered by-áreaTh-áFilter V1.23 "All posts by this pilot are personal held views and not representitive of-áany-ácorp or alliance I am currently a member of. Like I'd give a-ásh*t anyway. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster. |

Kristoff Merkas
Industrial Mining Exploration
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.27 18:13:00 -
[40] - Quote
As a new player who joined EVE, Just recently actually. I can assure you that a large number of the people who Play EVE, do not actually feel the way that the OP assumes they should. Yes, Cloaking Campers are an issue, I have been murdered by them a few times now. Though, Leaving EVE is a childish, and perhaps grave; mistake. Yes, cloaking I do feel is a bit OP, especially for the Covert Ops ships, and the entire invisibility from other ships, is a bit OP as well. In my opinion, as a "newb" to this game, and just recently got above 1 Million SP; there is a small issue here, but not one near the size that you claim.
I believe, instead of raging, and screaming over this issue, maybe some people should assemble a group, with warp disrupters, and a few HIC's and go kill the campers. Much like "Robin Hood" and his Merry Men. But, aside from that, I do feel that the CCP, (this should be suggested to a few CSM's since many people may feel this way) should create a device, equippable to Interdiction Cruisers, that can reveal cloaked ships, say within a few hundred Kilometers. Much like a Warp Disruption Bubble.
I have read a large portion of these posts, and if anything it has taught me something. EVE is a game where the Populous can make the changes. So, united, we will succeed and divided we shall fall. Leaving the game is doing just that, quitting. Dividing ourselves, we will fall. Leaving the game, you are giving credence to the success of these "cloaky campers". If they kill you, and you quit, they are successful. If you don't like them, make it a mistake to become one. Make every cloaky camper pay their dues to society, by dropping a fleet on them, and making them pay the ultimate price, and pod them.
Thanks, and that was the rant of a noob. But hey, To all of you Oldies out there, we really respect you, atleast some of us do. o7 Semi-Official Diplomat for the Industrial Mining Exploration Corporation. (Z-TR) Mission Runner/Small Time PvP |

Chandaris
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
469
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 14:46:00 -
[41] - Quote
Maybe people keep bringing it up because there is truth to what they are saying.
Cloaking mechanics heavily favor the aggressor when coupled with hot drop mechanics (which ruined the game a long time ago IMO)
Cloak's requiring the use of fuel, capacitor, or an ability to probe them down over time if they are sat at zero or some similar idea are actually decent suggestions
cloaks should be powerful, but i shouldn't be able to cloak forever in one spot and collect intel forever. |

wagashi
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 04:32:00 -
[42] - Quote
Really?
All mechanics favor the aggressor when you ratting, because your ratting(or mining). Now matter what you want to say this whole thread is about someone attacking 'you' while 'you' are not in 'your' PVP ship. All the nerf cloaking threads are begging CCP to remove the ability of cloaked ships to attack on their terms and force the combat to begin when the residents are ready to do so. However nerf crowd still wants the local to give them perfect intel so they can avoid the invader with their PVE ship. Thats not balance that happy horse crap.
Lets point to another thing here, Jump range. Most nullseccers live in regions that completely consumed by their own alliance or alliances that blue to them. There are good chunk of these that so distant from neighboring regions that is impossible for carrier let alone a titan or black ops bridge reach. So if they're 10 dudes rolling about in black ops ships in your region and no one reports it intel well then your coalition sucks. |

Baaldor
In Igne Morim Easily Excited
166
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 19:50:00 -
[43] - Quote
Chandaris wrote:Maybe people keep bringing it up because there is truth to what they are saying.
Not really, it is folk that generally afraid of the dark and and the unknown.
Chandaris wrote:Cloaking mechanics heavily favor the aggressor when coupled with hot drop mechanics (which ruined the game a long time ago IMO)
Yes that is your opinion and puking an opinion based on your own fears, is not only fantastic, but you have just gave EvE more credibility.
What game can you play that allows other players to screw with the person with in the game and mind **** them out of game.
Chandaris wrote:Cloak's requiring the use of fuel, capacitor, or an ability to probe them down over time if they are sat at zero or some similar idea are actually decent suggestions
Fine allow the cloaker fire when cloaked. Because as you know the person can not attack nor defend.
Chandaris wrote:cloaks should be powerful, but i shouldn't be able to cloak forever in one spot and collect intel forever.
Right, when you dock, you get no local. |

Chandaris
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
476
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:04:00 -
[44] - Quote
Quote:Not really, it is folk that generally afraid of the dark and and the unknown.
It's not really the unknown is it. They're in local, they're not docked. It's fairly obvious what they are.
Quote:Yes that is your opinion and puking an opinion based on your own fears, is not only fantastic, but you have just gave EvE more credibility.
What game can you play that allows other players to screw with the person with in the game and mind **** them out of game.
TBH, Eve could use a little bit less of that. Yea yea, the harshness of lowsec, and being able to grief other players all day err day. I've always been of the firm belief that a lot of these mechanics (easy highsec ganking, afk cloaking, blob/hotdropping) cause the game to shed a lot more players than it ultimately gains. Toning down some of these mechanics would not necessarily 'undo eve'.
Quote:Fine allow the cloaker fire when cloaked. Because as you know the person can not attack nor defend.
This statement makes no gramatical sense.
Quote:Right, when you dock, you get no local.
Local should have been obliterated a long, long time ago and replaced with an actual useful d-scan mechanic. People popping through wormholes or covert cynoing in appearing in local makes no real sense, as local is supposed to be an indication of who jumped in/out via gates, reported to capsuleers from the omni-present traffic control. A change in local mechanics, and the elimination of it in some or all of sov space would drive a lot more compelling gameplay tbh, but, I'm getting pretty far off topic so I will shut up now.
|

Jacque Custeau
Knights of the Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:12:00 -
[45] - Quote
The blops hotdrops favor the attacker because it allows a whole gang to drop on one person in the blink of an eye. Every enemy ship is a potential cloaked stargate in your system. You can even d-scan while cloaked, so you do not have to show you hand until it is too late for anyone else to do anything about it.
Anyway, I don't think there should be any activity in the game where you can walk away from the screen hours at a time and be completely safe, and at no cost. Even a POS consumes fuel, and that forcefield that goes up is not free. EvE had 'safespots' and then introduced probing, and then introduced cloaking. But cloaky ships were scouts and didn't pack much punch. Things have changed, and cloaks are now the new 'safespots' that people despised so much.
Just like ratter/miner has local and intel channels and what not, the cloaker/agressor has all manner of map stats to pick his targets. He can open the in game map or dotlan and see pirate deaths in the last hour, number of ships in space, number of jumps per hour...a real treasure trove of intel.
As for ratting in cheap ships and large groups, as a method of countering the cov ops cloak, its a horrible idea that has never actually been tried by anyone who suggests it. the cov ops gang will simply receive the new intel and adjust their numbers and loadouts in seconds. I have seen 8 bombers drop on a single procurer. And why not? Fuel is cheap, bridging back and forth is easy, no risk and you get to ruin someone else's gameplay, which is the real goal here.
PLEX prices are seasonal. This time last year they were around this price and they kept climbing into the xmas shopping season before they returned to normal. I think we should be able to argue against a game mechanic on its own merits/faults without talking about it "killing eve". As for Star Citizen, I grew up on WC games and would give anything Chris Roberts put out a try. |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
685
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 16:33:00 -
[46] - Quote
Hotdrops favor the aggressor. And this is why they're a good thing.
It's a partial balance to a system that allow to lock and farm whole null sec areas and make them safer than HS. This is not due to any players skill or effort but simply due to free intel from local, mechanics that prompt massive blue conglomerates, blobbing, the lame Dominion sovreignity system and other mechanics.
Everything is geared to favor annd make trivial the defence. Hotdrops is a mere antidote to a total stagnation. Far not enough, but better thann nothing.
CCP see this stagnation is bad for the general gameplay, and the fact they're adding more covert ops ships and soon overhauling black ops should give a clue about the trend. |

Jacque Custeau
Knights of the Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.09 11:56:00 -
[47] - Quote
I don't think any discussion can occur about intel from local without mentioning the map intel. A person looking for victims can pull up development indices, pirate kills per hour, number of pilots in space...etc and all manner of information so that he knows exactly where to go to find a victim. And the local channel benefits both the attacker and the resident. The attacker does not waste time looking around in a system when he is the only one in local.
So using the local intel as justification for why afk cloaking just doesn't hold water. |

Sausage Master
Central Sausage Freight
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.09 12:13:00 -
[48] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote: The cloaky camper issue has become so bad .
I run deliveries into all sorts of places, low & nul etc. I have never encountered the cloaky camper issue before? Where is it happening? It may just be a problem in your local area?
|

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
688
|
Posted - 2013.11.09 17:14:00 -
[49] - Quote
Jacque Custeau wrote:And the local channel benefits both the attacker and the resident. The attacker does not waste time looking around in a system when he is the only one in local.
So using the local intel as justification for why afk cloaking just doesn't hold water.
Good. So would you simply removing local and this would be balanced? Both, attacker/ganker and ratter/miner benefit of it in the same way? So could be just removed and we had the same balance as now. Are you sure?
Fact is: currently is possible to lock and secure large part of null sec. Not even in HS such level of safety this is possible. And this is not due to some effort or active gameplay, patroling, scouting, intercepting and destorying enemies... is done simply due to passive and skilless mechanics based on avoiding any risk and any gameplay.
Parts of the game locked in such way are not healthy for the general EVE gameplay. This needs to be changed.
People developed and use tactics like AFK cloacking and hotdrops simply becuase is the only way to bring some risk and some action in these areas. Is still far not enough. Give them more option to be a threat ffor you and you'll see less hotdrops.
|

Jacque Custeau
Knights of the Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 14:07:00 -
[50] - Quote
Sura Sadiva wrote:Jacque Custeau wrote:And the local channel benefits both the attacker and the resident. The attacker does not waste time looking around in a system when he is the only one in local.
So using the local intel as justification for why afk cloaking just doesn't hold water. Good. So would you simply removing local and this would be balanced? Both, attacker/ganker and ratter/miner benefit of it in the same way? So could be just removed and we had the same balance as now. Are you sure?
Once again we are talking about afk cloaking, its related to hotdropping but not the same thing. And you cannot talk about local and map intel tools separately. If local channel is being used as justification for cloaking, especially afk cloaking, then remove it. But also remove the map tools. No longer will hot droppers see development indices, true sec, jumps per hour, pirates killed per hour, or any statistics regarding which would be a better place to find victims. They want to find someone, they jump in and scan. Then we can get rid of cloaking.
The afk cloaker crowd keep pointing to local, but ignore the huge amounts of intel ccp gives them in the map tool or through dotlan. Hot dropping will exist as long as there are cynos in the game, but no one should be able to cloak up and go afk and be completely safe. Safer than being in empire, safer than being in low sec. All the while pretending to be tough guys. |

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
897
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 09:03:00 -
[51] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Title says it all.
The cloaky camper issue has become so bad that there are entire constellations where most people have simply walked away. And they don't go to another constellation of nullsec, or even highsec - they have gone to War Thunder, WoW, and the Star Citizen beta.
EVE Online is being strangled by campy cloakers shutting down systems, and making it impossible to play. Add to that if you do play, you get hotdropped and killed by 5 to 10 black ops battleships, or if you have Pandemic, 2 or 3 Nyx. That would be fine, except having ganked they warp off to safes, cloak, then wait cloaked until they can get a new gank, or jump out.
There is no fight, no epic battle, just a gank then nothing more until another player undocks, gets ganked, and says screw this I'm playing a game that I can *play* not one that consists of everyone afk camping for weeks.
Solutions.
(1) Make cloaking devices require Heavy Water as fuel, which depletes at 25 per minute. Use your cloak wisely, it will run out.
(2) Make it that only Stealth Bombers can recloak while an engagement timer is active. Yes, I mean the 15 minute one. If you jump in your Nyx to gank someone, then they can scan you down and actually fight. PvP might happen, rather than gank and go.
(3) this is actually the most commonly discussed in our null alliance: we all go to Star Citizen the day it launches on the basis that the Devs have painted themselves into a gameplay corner now, such that in effect the Rogue Sneak Attack from World of Warcraft summarizes the state of 'pvp' in EVE Online, and things are simply going to go downhill from here on out for EVE. Do I ant that? No, not really. I like EVE. But I think there is a massive problem with instant alpha damage and hotdrop insta kills.
And don't get me wrong, I own two Redeemers, and mercilessly butcher people too. I just think there is neither challenge nor skill required for a lot of this game now, and the changes (1) and (2) above would improve things a lot.
And if nothing changes ... well there is always Star Citizen. Or Darkfall Unholy Wars, that has better pvp than EVE now, or at least will after the next massive balance patch. So yes CCP, shape up or watch this game wither and die.
And CSM ... do your job. The current suggestions from CCP are going down the track of increased alpha, shorter fight times. All that means is fewer players, because everyone stays in their POS / stations and logs out when you see an enemy scout, because you know the hotdrop is right behind them. With hindsight, adding instant travel was a massive mistake. But the map is so bad in EVE that it was needed ... so EVE is currently in this horrible design mess. At least the cloaking issue can be fixed by the simple and game-consistent mechanic of requiring a cloak to use fuel. That one simple change would make covert pilots need to use their brains ... and if afk all day, would lead to their deaths.
Lol - people like you will get ganked and camped no matter in which game you flee... especially the ones thinking they will find a easier life in Star citizen...(maybe in the solo-player version)
|

Ossirrus
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 08:10:00 -
[52] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Title says it all.
I completely agree Local has been OP for FAR TOO LONG. We must end afk cloaking now! Take away local listings and afk cloakers will never bother us again!!!! Those pesky at keyboard cloakers might be bad though. |

Solstice Project
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
4484
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 17:34:00 -
[53] - Quote
Wow, OP is dense as ****. lol
I'm sorry, but so much faulty logic, based on faulty assumptions which are mistaken as facts and that bias... holy ****, dense as ****! |

Dunpeal Hunter
Zervas Aeronautics The Unthinkables
18
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 15:29:00 -
[54] - Quote
I am pretty sure its been said or suggested already, but i am personaly like 90% sure that CCP will come with a module in the near future like the siphon unit, or the refit module that will make it possible to disrupt cloaking modules within a certain area.
They said themselves that the 4 modules coming out tomorrow will only be the beginning, and that they have plans to add more. |

Lenroc Elisav
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 13:40:00 -
[55] - Quote
I guess CCP point of view on the matter is made pretty obvious by the design choice of allowing covop cynos through the new Mobile Cynosural Inhibitor field. I don't know why null sec systems still have local. Make DScan pick something like "Unidentified energy source/spike/surge" and auto-repeat at 10-15 seconds interval and get rid of local in null already. Deep null miners, that watch **** while getting rich solo ganking asteroids w/o no risk, are screwing the market for the rest of us :p. |

Agondray
Avalon Templaris
11
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 16:33:00 -
[56] - Quote
Well I think ccp is tired of eve but that's just me, why else would you creat a module to do something than nerf it than make it obsolete by making a module that completely counter acts it. Tengu used to get 100kms with heavy missiles so the nerf them to not even worth using in missions. Way back when the hit a nerf on warp stabs than made the hic that is awesome but shouldn't stop something with 8 stab but does easily. They want the universe to be chaos, they advertise for new players with no real environment for them and give their support. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1455
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 03:56:00 -
[57] - Quote
AFK cloakers can't harm you because they are AFK. I don't see the problem. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

Ronny Hugo
Dark Fusion Industries Limitless Inc.
41
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 09:45:00 -
[58] - Quote
At OP, The only reason you whine about cloakies is because its blatantly obvious that you're just a bug under a boot and all your skills are just irrelevant, while it is only somewhat obvious without cloak. If you want a PVP fight, attack income sources. Then they'll turn up in their thousands. |

Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc Brave Collective
880
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 11:46:00 -
[59] - Quote
If cloakers in your system are preventing you from doing whatever you wanted to do, its because what you wanted to do was wrong in the first place.
Null sec is a harsh place where doing stuff you can only do with an empty local, like ratting in a super carrier ( ) should be the exception driven by an occasional player-opportunism, not the norm. Thus, afk cloaking is just putting back some form of balance into less-populated areas of null sec. Signature Tanking - Best Tanking. |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
783
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 20:21:00 -
[60] - Quote
Don't ruin cloaking for us wormholers because some vaginally inclined nullbears are scared of the cloaky boogeyman. No trolling please |

Alexhandr Shkarov
Dog Nation United
5
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 15:24:00 -
[61] - Quote
Sigh.
If you're so butthurt about AFK cloaky ships that you insist on beating a dead horse that will not be changed, then yea.. bugger off to Star Citizen. |

Arsala
Minmatar Mining and Manufacturing.
0
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 01:39:00 -
[62] - Quote
I have no interest in low or null sec, I don't hang with bottom feeders, But i love it when someone comes out with a concern or idea that could possible make eve better for more players and yet the "hardcore" players who sit for hours waiting for a 5 minute period of battle which is really nothing more than:
no active player skill (Added to) automated computer controlled turret fire (multiplied by) my time invested skill sets (Divided into) my ISK gear (Equals) win or loss.
and this is supposed to make you hard core.....hahaha
anyhow back on topic.... they scream and yell NO!!! your and idiot your logic is flawed....go home noob, you care-bear go to high sec.
anyway...eventually the corrosive attitude in this game will cause issues as it has in the past. Soon another "eve/WoW" will take the lead and when CCP goes to play the numbers they will have to follow the money, it is a business, and they must turn a profit. Its funny how all these "Expansions" have been geared more toward making game play more care-bear friendly and not more Yarr! Gotta kill 'em all!! play style.
anyhow Don't care, I play my way you play yours, and I promise you now the rager's will rage.
|

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
NEW ORDER DEATH DEALERS CODE.
218
|
Posted - 2014.02.06 22:20:00 -
[63] - Quote
Boo Hoo, someone is making my local chat useless. Go live in a wormhole. New player resources: http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Main_Page - General information http://www.evealtruist.com/p/know-your-enemy.html - Learn to PvP http://belligerentundesirables.com/ - Safaris, Awoxes, Ganking and Griefing-á |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2436
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 18:16:00 -
[64] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Baaldor wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Remove cloaked ships from local. Problem solved. You have all my upvotes sir. Talking about upvotes you have applied two there, but I notice that when you post you often have a single up vote, I wonder how that is happening, are you really that insecure that you must upvote your own posts with your other account, I noticed it on almost every inane post you have made, you sir are most amusing...
It's because they are making good posts. I realize this is strange to you as you haven't made one yet. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2436
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 18:17:00 -
[65] - Quote
Making good posts is detrimental to the game, I hope you enjoy dying ccp when ~vaporware product of this week~ comes out lol |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4612
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 00:05:00 -
[66] - Quote
Arsala wrote:Soon another "eve/WoW" will take the lead and when CCP goes to play the numbers they will have to follow the money, it is a business, and they must turn a profit.
You must be new here. Last time CCP tried to follow the money they went & lost a whole bunch of it & had to sack 20% of their staff to recover from that terrible mistake. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4612
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 01:40:00 -
[67] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Making good posts is detrimental to the game, I hope you enjoy dying ccp when ~vaporware product of this week~ comes out lol
EVE will finally die when Goat Simulator is released. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1671
|
Posted - 2014.02.14 05:39:00 -
[68] - Quote
Get rid of null outpost AFK'rs and I'll be happy to listen to the whines about cloaky AFK's. At least we're in space, if the client crashes or net disconnects we uncloak and sit in space for 30 seconds, able to be probed. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Ecoskii
Penal Servitude
14
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 23:23:00 -
[69] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Get rid of null outpost AFK'rs and I'll be happy to listen to the whines about cloaky AFK's. At least we're in space, if the client crashes or net disconnects we uncloak and sit in space for 30 seconds, able to be probed.
yeah right - i'll be waiting 23/7 with my porbes out and a dic on standby to catch those 30 secs - only emphasises how dumb the current position Is for that to need to happen... |

Brendan Anneto
Gladiators of Rage Fidelas Constans
21
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 18:12:00 -
[70] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Title says it all.
The cloaky camper issue has become so bad that there are entire constellations where most people have simply walked away. And they don't go to another constellation of nullsec, or even highsec - they have gone to War Thunder, WoW, and the Star Citizen beta.
Unsub?? and when you do can i have your stuff!!
Proverbs 1:26-27 |

Dalto Bane
Black Swarm Locust
75
|
Posted - 2014.04.19 10:32:00 -
[71] - Quote
I have said this every time one of these threads pop up. I'll be more than happy to share this little gem of how to deal with cloak ships in your system. Find out who's cloaky it belongs to, then use that exact same tactic on them in their system for a few days. Trust me when I tell you that 9 out of 10 times they are just as risk adverse as their victim and will back off because they are afraid the big bad cloaky monsters gonna eat them. Dalto Bane for CSM10- Getting an early start. -á-My posts are my platform
|

endgame767
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 13:52:00 -
[72] - Quote
the point is in eve there is always a counter to everything there is no counter for a cloak it should have to use a fuel to keep active it stupid that you cant probe them done either it does need to be fixed |

Jessica Duranin
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
71
|
Posted - 2014.04.26 10:28:00 -
[73] - Quote
What's with everyone beating on cloaks? Cloaks on their own are pretty well balanced. Cov OPs capable ships are relatively weak and T1 cloaks have serious penalties attached to them. In w-space you don't even know if there is a cloaky in your system but it's not a problem because that cloaky usually won't kill you. The fleet in the next system will, but you can put up scouts and see them coming.
In k-space it's the cyno that is the real problem because it effectively allows you to cloak your entire fleet without having it suffer from any of the penalties. One possible solution for this would be to put a timer on the activation of cynos after a cloak has been used or just make fitting cloaks and cynos mutually exclusive. |

Karen Galeo
Anarchist Asylum Infinite Anarchy
41
|
Posted - 2014.04.26 19:21:00 -
[74] - Quote
GOOD GOD.
If Null Sec is too dangerous for you, move to high sec. You won't have to worry about ganks, there.
Or move to wormholes. The mining is just as good, and nobody can hotdrop you. Author of the [url]http://kgaleo.blogspot.com/[/url] blog.
|

Mag's
the united SCUM.
17163
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 09:01:00 -
[75] - Quote
endgame767 wrote:the point is in eve there is always a counter to everything there is no counter for a cloak it should have to use a fuel to keep active it stupid that you cant probe them done either it does need to be fixed There are counters for the cloak. You can shoot them, decloak them at a set range and stop them recloaking when locked, or remaining at that range.
Just because the counters do not fit your requirements, does not exclude them from being there or that anything needs to be fixed.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

ViRtUoZone
0ne Percent. Odin's Call
2
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 00:46:00 -
[76] - Quote
Grace Ishukone wrote:Title says it all.
The cloaky camper issue has become so bad that there are entire constellations where most people have simply walked away. And they don't go to another constellation of nullsec, or even highsec - they have gone to War Thunder, WoW, and the Star Citizen beta.
EVE Online is being strangled by campy cloakers shutting down systems, and making it impossible to play. Add to that if you do play, you get hotdropped and killed by 5 to 10 black ops battleships, or if you have Pandemic, 2 or 3 Nyx. That would be fine, except having ganked they warp off to safes, cloak, then wait cloaked until they can get a new gank, or jump out.
There is no fight, no epic battle, just a gank then nothing more until another player undocks, gets ganked, and says screw this I'm playing a game that I can *play* not one that consists of everyone afk camping for weeks.
Solutions.
(1) Make cloaking devices require Heavy Water as fuel, which depletes at 25 per minute. Use your cloak wisely, it will run out.
(2) Make it that only Stealth Bombers can recloak while an engagement timer is active. Yes, I mean the 15 minute one. If you jump in your Nyx to gank someone, then they can scan you down and actually fight. PvP might happen, rather than gank and go.
(3) this is actually the most commonly discussed in our null alliance: we all go to Star Citizen the day it launches on the basis that the Devs have painted themselves into a gameplay corner now, such that in effect the Rogue Sneak Attack from World of Warcraft summarizes the state of 'pvp' in EVE Online, and things are simply going to go downhill from here on out for EVE. Do I ant that? No, not really. I like EVE. But I think there is a massive problem with instant alpha damage and hotdrop insta kills.
And don't get me wrong, I own two Redeemers, and mercilessly butcher people too. I just think there is neither challenge nor skill required for a lot of this game now, and the changes (1) and (2) above would improve things a lot.
And if nothing changes ... well there is always Star Citizen. Or Darkfall Unholy Wars, that has better pvp than EVE now, or at least will after the next massive balance patch. So yes CCP, shape up or watch this game wither and die.
And CSM ... do your job. The current suggestions from CCP are going down the track of increased alpha, shorter fight times. All that means is fewer players, because everyone stays in their POS / stations and logs out when you see an enemy scout, because you know the hotdrop is right behind them. With hindsight, adding instant travel was a massive mistake. But the map is so bad in EVE that it was needed ... so EVE is currently in this horrible design mess. At least the cloaking issue can be fixed by the simple and game-consistent mechanic of requiring a cloak to use fuel. That one simple change would make covert pilots need to use their brains ... and if afk all day, would lead to their deaths.
LOL 'And CSM ... do your job.' You've gotta love it when one player isn't getting what they want and suddenly all of CSM isn't doing their job! XD If you're too scared to do whatever it is in what is probably your HOME system because there's ONE 'scary weird name' in local you sir need to go somewhere else until your ********* have fully developed.
The blurred word (because that's a thing now) is another word for male genitalia. |

Tran Tuyen
Amadio Family Enterprises
24
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 23:35:00 -
[77] - Quote
Shorter OP: I'm mad when AFK cloakies make me ship spin. If CCP doesn't fix this, I'm gonna go ship spin in Star Citizen instead.
PS: can you even spin your ship in Star Citizen, or do you have to settle for just looking at it? |

Vartan Sarkisian
Reasonable People Of Sound Mind
148
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 16:33:00 -
[78] - Quote
An active cloaky camper is either eyes for a fleet/someone else or after easy kills, if you do not feed them easy kills they will go away. If they are AFK then they cannot hurt you, what you are fearing is what MAY happen, theyGÇÖll suddenly uncloak next to you and cyno in a world of hurt. But again, donGÇÖt feed them easy kills and they will go away. (generally :)) I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... Time to die. |

Dont Tasemebro
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 20:34:00 -
[79] - Quote
but when these people leave their PCs on overnight, they burn a lot of electricity, increasing CCP's carbon footprint. You have to think green, CCP. Ban afk campers, save the Earth. |

Baaldor
In Igne Morim
250
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 21:12:00 -
[80] - Quote
Vartan Sarkisian wrote:An active cloaky camper is either eyes for a fleet/someone else or after easy kills, if you do not feed them easy kills they will go away. If they are AFK then they cannot hurt you, what you are fearing is what MAY happen, theyGÇÖll suddenly uncloak next to you and cyno in a world of hurt. But again, donGÇÖt feed them easy kills and they will go away. (generally :))
Not sure why this is so hard for peeps to understand.
|

Wrent Simulus
Quantum Dynamic
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 12:09:00 -
[81] - Quote
Man... you null sec people wouldn't last two seconds mining in high sec.
People warping in and out of local, never knowing if they're going to jump you. Being in a ship that's designed to not be able to fight back...
You would be a nervous wreck just undocking in your hulk...
Also no, you can't have risk free gameplay. |

Naomi Hale
Children of New Eden
230
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 15:38:00 -
[82] - Quote
To the op - How do they attack you while cloaked, afk and apparently playing another game? That's a true skill.
As a scanner/explorer I get nervous when people talk about nerfing cloaks and 'afk' cloakers. Mainly because when I'm scanning and hacking I don't have time to reassure everyone in local that I'm not there to kill them (because my ship can't). Cloaking is the only defense explorers have, even in fleets, you lock us we're usually dead soon after.
Also until you can prove that they are afk and not simply 1) ignoring you 2) busy with other things or 3) not constantly looking at local because their fleet has lookouts, then just stop assuming they are afk. I'm Naomi Hale and this is my favourite thread on the forums. |

Jur Tissant
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
45
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 17:27:00 -
[83] - Quote
Wrent Simulus wrote:Man... you null sec people wouldn't last two seconds mining in high sec.
People warping in and out of local, never knowing if they're going to jump you. Being in a ship that's designed to not be able to fight back...
You would be a nervous wreck just undocking in your hulk...
Also no, you can't have risk free gameplay.
Except for the part where Concord will drop on them like a bag of bricks if they try anything.
|

Ahost Gceo
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
80
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 22:04:00 -
[84] - Quote
Jur Tissant wrote:Wrent Simulus wrote:Man... you null sec people wouldn't last two seconds mining in high sec.
People warping in and out of local, never knowing if they're going to jump you. Being in a ship that's designed to not be able to fight back...
You would be a nervous wreck just undocking in your hulk...
Also no, you can't have risk free gameplay. Except for the part where Concord will drop on them like a bag of bricks if they try anything. Oh noez, CONCORD dropped on my under 10 million isk destroyer! Whatever shall I do?!
Oh yeah, blap your 200+ million mining barge on my way down. If you are one of those people who fits deadspace and faction mods to tank your Hulk, I might have even made a day's worth of mining profit off you. ??? |

Wrent Simulus
Quantum Dynamic
5
|
Posted - 2014.05.11 02:41:00 -
[85] - Quote
Jur Tissant wrote:Wrent Simulus wrote:Man... you null sec people wouldn't last two seconds mining in high sec.
People warping in and out of local, never knowing if they're going to jump you. Being in a ship that's designed to not be able to fight back...
You would be a nervous wreck just undocking in your hulk...
Also no, you can't have risk free gameplay. Except for the part where Concord will drop on them like a bag of bricks if they try anything.
CONCORD is not risk, it doesn't prevent anything and it's exactly quantifiable, you know exactly the outcome of CONCORD. It just is a different version of enforcing ammo consumption.
And in before "you want to stop all high sec ganking" I think that it's a necessary part of the game |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
1194
|
Posted - 2014.05.11 07:49:00 -
[86] - Quote
Wrent Simulus wrote:CONCORD is not risk, it doesn't prevent anything and it's exactly quantifiable, you know exactly the outcome of CONCORD.
100% chance of the feds showing up to blap me means I can quantify the exact risk of losing my ship in a gank, so yes, it most certainly exists. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Wrent Simulus
Quantum Dynamic
5
|
Posted - 2014.05.11 16:56:00 -
[87] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Wrent Simulus wrote:CONCORD is not risk, it doesn't prevent anything and it's exactly quantifiable, you know exactly the outcome of CONCORD. 100% chance of the feds showing up to blap me means I can quantify the exact risk of losing my ship in a gank, so yes, it most certainly exists.
It's not risk. If it's a 100% it's a quantifiable cost.
I don't "risk" my money when I go to the store and buy something. I risk it if I go to the casino. If there were a chance that CONCORD would not show up, then blapping a miner would be a "risk", but it's 100%, therefor it's a cost. |

Cooper Gribbles
Gespenster Kompanie Circle-Of-Two
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.11 21:52:00 -
[88] - Quote
I think there is a very slight issue. I am about 3 months in to Nullsec and agree that AFK cloakies can be a pain. I also agree that using cloakies can be a very good tactic in shutting down mining, PvE, and exploration operations. I have been on the giving and recieving end of this. So, what we have is a good tactic for shutting down "carebear" operations but no real useful tactic (that I'm aware of) for stopping such tactics.
What I love about eve is there is always something that can kill something else effectively. A Ying to the Yang so to speak. While I don't think the "cloaky issue" will kill eve in the slightest, I do think there needs to be a danger, HOWEVER MINOR AND SLIGHT IT MAY BE, to a cloaky bomber sitting in a system for hours. The idea from the original post that a cloak runs off of a fuel or ammo isn't a horrible idea. PvP all day and you tend to have to run back for ammo at some point. The solution to running out of ammo or fuel is perhaps a cloaky hauler running ammo back and forth. That way a carebear operation can still be shut down, but it has to be a team effort to do so. One person with two accounts could still do it, but at a greater effort. |

Amyclas Amatin
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
253
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 23:50:00 -
[89] - Quote
I have ratted and mined ( simultaneously ) while in the presence of a cloaky scout. I'm sure wormhole people do the same all the time. Sometimes I drop the man next to me a convo to offer teamwork and mutual protection!
Cloakies in local are just more friends to play with. For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/
High-Sec has a future, But do You? Buy a Mining Permit to Secure yours today. |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
274
|
Posted - 2014.05.15 11:09:00 -
[90] - Quote
Cloaky camper is a non-issue.
The real point is that you should either:
1) be able to evade or deal with whatever pops out of that covert cyno, if and when it goes up
2) afford losing your spaceships if you cannot |

Immortal Chrono Pimpin
Vengance Inc.
76
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 16:34:00 -
[91] - Quote
Why has this not been moved to C&P yet?
This is obviously tears.
qq, Afk cloaking does not kill the game, Its all apart of the cycle of life.
If you want to make better profit in null you take the risk.
If their was no risk/reward there would be a imbalance of players in areas of space. |

Meytal
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
425
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 12:36:00 -
[92] - Quote
You guys whining about AFK cloaked players ... What would you do if CCP ever did implement the suggestion that cloaked ships no longer show up in local? Would you ever undock if you realized there could be a dozen or more cloaked ships out there just waiting to pounce?
For the clueless (OP included): Nullsec is not safe. Nullsec never was safe. Nullsec is never going to be safe. People can and will shoot you in Nullsec, and they are supposed to do this. Your "landlord" can't protect you against the random gangs, only against full-scale assaults on the system. Protect yourself, or leave.
Hisec is where you go if you want minimal, if any, chance of people shooting at you.
Asking for Nullsec to be safe only results in people laughing at you. And so they should.
|

Ecoskii
Penal Servitude
14
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 22:47:00 -
[93] - Quote
This keeps getitng posted about because the current afk mechanic is a pos - unbalanced and stops pvp & pve content. CCP have never posted on this topic for 10 years - a disgrace. There have been tens of sensible ideas that provide a way for cloaking to add content - so many wasted opportunities
Please dont post the dumb 'Someone who is afk can't harm you' or the ludicrous 'Remove local' arguements |

Samillian
Angry Mustellid Overload Everything
571
|
Posted - 2014.06.25 14:45:00 -
[94] - Quote
Ecoskii wrote:This keeps getitng posted about because the current afk mechanic is a pos - unbalanced and stops pvp & pve content. CCP have never posted on this topic for 10 years - a disgrace. There have been tens of sensible ideas that provide a way for cloaking to add content - so many wasted opportunities
Please dont post the dumb 'Someone who is afk can't harm you' or the ludicrous 'Remove local' arguements
The last comment I saw from CCP about cloaking AFK or otherwise was "working as intended". I'd post the link but it has been a long while and I'm having trouble locating it. Apologies for that.
In fact AFK cloaking seems to be doing a fairly good impression of being dead subject from CCPs side as far as I can see. I am lead to believe this by the fact that AFK cloaking threads tend to be shut down almost as quickly as they are opened as redundant and that there hasn't even been a throw away comment by a dev on the subject one way or another in years.
Perhaps if the average AFK cloaking thread wasn't someone whining about how they and their corps moved to Nullsec and suddenly they can't undock and their revenue stream is being impacted by a single individual sat in local it might gain more traction as a subject.
If people are prepared to allow someone watching Netflix or PvPing on another account to keep them bottled in station they should really take a long hard look at the type of space they moved to and why rather than crying to CCP. NBSI shall be the whole of the Law |

Saisin
State War Academy Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2014.06.25 21:26:00 -
[95] - Quote
I am in favor of doing something about afk cloaking.
My vote goes to an EMP like pos module whose effect would decloak ships system wide, friends and foes alike, and prevent them to cloak again for 2 or 3 minutes, and a deployable mobile object whose emp effect would only apply on the grid where it is deployed.
Active cloakers would then be able to warp,out and evade hunters, while those that are afk would simply get killed and podded back to their station where they can remain afk.... "surrender your ego, be free". innuendo.
solo? There is a new hope http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/2014/05/ok-now-im-betting-man.html |

Silver Dagger Kondur
Element Underground
37
|
Posted - 2014.06.25 21:33:00 -
[96] - Quote
I fell asleep at a gate & woke to the sounds of my ship being destroyed, didn't even have time to warp my pod out, lost it too. (Sleep, even at the keyboard is all the same as AFK)
And, there are combat probes that show who's where, right?
And if "they" are AFK, I warp right on past them, they can't react fast enough to point or lock me, right? (unless I warp into a bubble, I can warp past anyone, yes?) |

Iain Cariaba
In Over Our Heads
84
|
Posted - 2014.06.27 19:31:00 -
[97] - Quote
My 0.02 isk worth.
Here's your options when someone cloaky camps your system: 1. You get your own cloaky ship and go camp someone else's system. 2. Build a bait ship and have your corpmates in combat ships ready to pounce. 3. HTFU and deal with it. 4. Unsub. 5. Post on forums the same rehashed topic that's been posted repeatedly since the cloak was introduced to the game.
I suggets option 4 before option 5.
Now I'll take my change. If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong. |

Sean Parisi
Fugutive Task Force A T O N E M E N T
579
|
Posted - 2014.07.06 06:17:00 -
[98] - Quote
They will never have to decloak. They just need to gather more heavy water from your tears. |

13 nonames
Jumpbridg
6
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 06:44:00 -
[99] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:I love how their entire premise predicates on their absurd assertion that EVE is dying because of afk cloaking, and afk cloaking only. Gotta love the name dropping of Star Citizen too.
To the OP:
Get over it, and get over yourself. You are a coward. You don't belong in nullsec, wormhole space, lowsec, or any other kind of "lawless space", as these areas are frequently described.
Go back to highsec, and hide behind CONCORD, since other people scare you so much.
I am not against cloaky camping but i would like to see a counter to cloaks in general as i do think it is a bit broken like making it cost capacitor or charges like nanite paste the fuel is small but it also gives another way to weed them out and also make it so they can not log on and leave. |

Tian Toralen
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
14
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 07:50:00 -
[100] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:You have no in-game right to solo farm with your blinged out whatever.
What about having the right to go afk for an entire day, just to prevent the enemy from mining/ratting? What can the enemy do?
"Cloaked neutral! Reship to pvp! Keep warping to belts all day, maybe we catch him!" Or just sit in station. Or mine, and accept the fact that you will lose a ship. Friends protecting you? What's more boring - mining, or sitting in a pvp ship watching someone mine?
I won't renew my subscription because all EVE isk generating activities are totally boring. Other than that - yes it's a fun game. And - there are also cloaky campers, I can do nothing about, no matter the size of the fleet I am in. Cloaked neutral = dock and wait. Or, reship to pvp and wait. Or move to another system, and repeat the same stuff.
"Why don't you kill the camper? Do pvp or go to high sec!!". Well - he's cloaked... |

RoAnnon
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
4674
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 13:09:00 -
[101] - Quote
13 nonames wrote:I am not against cloaky camping but i would like to see a counter to cloaks in general as i do think it is a bit broken like making it cost capacitor or charges like nanite paste the fuel is small but it also gives another way to weed them out and also make it so they can not log on and leave.
The counter to cloaks is that a cloaked ship cannot activate any modules at all. Neither can an AFK pilot.
Every proposed "fix" to the imaginary problem of an AFK cloaker would not affect active pilots, only AFK pilots, so every single call for something to uncloak a ship is purely targeted at AFK players, who cannot defend themselves. Every call for some way to uncloak AFK cloakies is a desperate gambit to get a game mechanic that allows free kills.
TANSTAAFK So, you're a bounty hunter. No, that ain't it at all. Then what are you? I'm a bounty hunter. |

Jack Carrigan
Order of the Shadow The Revenant Order
3216
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 02:06:00 -
[102] - Quote
Reported for redundancy. "War is not measured in terms of who wins or loses, who is right or wrong.-á It is measured in terms of who survives"-á |
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
3436

|
Posted - 2014.10.19 05:06:00 -
[103] - Quote
Quote:3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.
Quote:5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive, and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote. Thread closed. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |